contract no. dcfa-504 non-process facilities program … · 2020-05-15 · contract no. dcfa-504...

CONTRACT NO. DCFA-504

NON-PROCESS FACILITIES PROGRAM MANAGER -A-E SERVICES

ADDENDUM NO. 2

APRIL 23, 2020

Proposers shall acknowledge receipt of this Addendum on Acknowledgement of Addenda as specified

under Section 12 “Additional RFP Terms and Conditions”, page 31, item 11.

This Addendum is hereby included in and made a part of the Contract Documents.

This Addendum is being provided to all Proposers.

All requirements of the original Solicitation shall remain in force except as amended by this addendum.

IMPORTANT NOTICE:

Interested Prime and Sub-Consultants should email an intent to respond to the POC

([email protected]) as soon as possible with the Proposer’s contact information to

assure that future communications and addendums are received timely.

The following corrections, changes, additions, deletions, revisions, and/or clarifications are hereby made

a part of the Contract Documents for the above referenced project. In case of conflicts between this

Addendum and previous issued Documents, this Addendum shall have precedence.

Proposers shall make the following changes to all pertinent sheets, pages, and paragraphs of the Request

for Proposal.

Addendum No. 2 consists of the following:

• Rev. A: Revised Solicitation Cover Page

• Rev. B: Section 8, Sub-section 8.2 Proposal Sections and Contents

• Rev. C: Section 8, Sub-Section 8.3 Bid Submission

• Rev. D: Section 8, Paragraph 8.7 Statement of Qualifications

• Rev. E: Section 8, Paragraph 8.8 Technical Approach

• Appendices.

mailto:[email protected]

DCFA 504 WSA Non-Process Facilities Program Manager A-E Services

Addendum 2

April 23, 2020 of 7

Rev. A: Remove SOLICITATION COVER PAGE and replace with the revised cover page

provided in appendix.

Technical Proposal Submission Date (REVISED)

The Technical proposal submission date is extended to Thursday May 14, 2020 / 2:00 PM ET.


Addendum 2

April 23, 2020 of 7

Rev. B: Delete Section 8 REQUIRED CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL, Sub-section 8.2 Proposal Sections

and Contents in its entirety and replace with the following:

8.2 Proposal Sections and Contents (REVISED)

Proposal

Sec No.

Proposal Section Name Limits

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

1 Cover and Transmittal Letter 1 page

2 Table of Contents

3 Executive Summary 5 page(s)

4 Statement of Qualifications

4.1 Organizational chart of proposed Team and Form

330-16f Section G (use form in Appendix 1)

1 page each

4.2 List of all proposed Sub-consultants, description of

their roles, and proposed percentage of the work

1 page per proposed

Subconsultant

4.3 Key Personnel Resumes

Use Standard Form 330 (Rev 8/2016) - Section E -

RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED

FOR THIS CONTRACT

Additional Resumes for non-key personnel may be

provided for up to 5 individuals utilizing the same

format

1 page for each resume

1 resume per each Key

Personnel

Maximum 5 additional

resumes for non-Key

Personnel

4.4 Firm Experiences

Use Standard Form 330 (Rev 8/2016) - SECTION F -

EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST

ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S

QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT

Minimum 3 Projects

Maximum 5 Projects

1 page per project

5 Technical Approach 14 pages

6 District of Columbia Professional Engineering License

7 Registration to do Business in D.C.

8 Good Faith Effort Checklist (use form in Appendix 3)

9 Acknowledgements and Certifications & Standard DC

Water Procurement Forms (Complete and submit all

forms in Appendix 4)

PRICE PROPOSAL

1 Labor Classification and Rates (use form in Appendix 5)

2 Audited Overhead Rates (use form in Appendix 6)

3 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Forms

(use form in Appendix 3)

4 MBE and WBE Certificates (use Form in Appendix 3)


Addendum 2

April 23, 2020 of 7

Rev. C: Revision on Section 8 REQUIRED CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL Sub-Section 8.3 Bid

Submission, as follows:

8.3 Bid Submission (REVISED)

8.3.1 Electronic Submission of Proposals and Notification of Intent to Submit Proposal as a Prime

Consultant

1. Proposals shall be submitted electronically to DC Water.

2. Firms who intend to respond as a Prime Consultant shall send an e-mail to

[email protected] no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Proposal

Due Date.

3. The email shall (1) confirm the firms’ intent to submit as a Prime Consultant, and (2) include the

Name, Title, Email Address and Telephone Number for a Primary and for a Secondary point

of contact.

4. Electronic Submission of Technical Proposals

Technical Proposal via email to [email protected]

Email size limit is 22MB

Divide files larger than 22MB into multiple files and send in separate emails.

File Name & Email Subject Line:

“DCFA-504-WSA”+“Company Name”+ “File x of y”

Example: “DCFA-504-WSA XYZ Consultants File 2 of 5”

Time stamp on last email received must be before proposal due date stated on revised cover sheet.

8.3.2 Project Specific Submission Instructions

1. Technical Proposals One (1) electronic copy of the Technical Proposal shall be sent to DC

Water.

2. Price Proposals shall be submitted electronically in a similar manner as Technical Proposals.

Price Proposals shall be submitted ONLY BY SHORTLISTED FIRMS who shall receive

separate notification and instruction.

3. Address Proposal and all Correspondence to:

Rudy Gonzalez, Contracting Officer

c/o Narcisse Atchamou

DC Water

1385 Canal Street SE, Washington, D.C. 20003




Addendum 2

April 23, 2020 of 7

Rev. D: Delete Section 8 REQUIRED CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL, paragraph 8.7 Statement of

Qualifications, item 8.7.2 in its entirety and replace with the following:

8.7 Statement of Qualifications (REVISED)

8.7.2 Key Personnel Resume

It is the responsibility of the Consultant to put forth a highly qualified team with the experience and

capabilities to undertake this Contract, and propose individuals who meet the specific qualifications

highlighted in this Section. All proposed substitutions of key personnel during the Contract duration shall

be subject to approval by DC Water. The specific qualification requirements for key positions are

provided below:

1. Project Director. The Project Director must have at least fifteen (15) years of facilities management

or architectural experience in a campus management environment.

2. Project Manager. The Project Manager must have at least five (5) years of facilities management

experience and Project Management Professional (PMP) or equivalent certification. The Project

Manager must have at least five (5) years of Project Management experience on $2 million, or more,

per year on Facilities Programs, within the last ten (10) years.

3. Program Manager. The Program Manager must have at least five (5) years of CIP Planning and

Implementation experience and Program Management Professional (PgMP) or equivalent

certification. The Program Manager must have at least five (5) years of Program Management

experience on $2 million, or more, per year on Facilities Programs, within the last ten (10) years.

Use Standard Form 330-16f, Section E to provide a one (1) page resume for each key personnel. In

addition, proposer may provide an additional maximum of five (5) resumes for other relevant non-key

personnel.


Addendum 2

April 23, 2020 of 7

Rev. E: Addition to Section 8 REQUIRED CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL, paragraph 8.8 Technical

Approach. Add 8.8.4 in its entirety:

8.8 Technical Approach (REVISED)

8.8.4 Subconsultant Requirement

Primes should select subconsultants that have technical expertise and experience that will be beneficial

to supporting the scope of this agreement. The fair share objective of this project is 28% minority

business enterprise and 4% woman business enterprise participation. Prime should describe scope of each proposed Sub, the percentage of allocated portion of work as Proposals

shall be evaluated based on the proposed percentage of work performed by MBE/WBE subcontractors, and the

proposed approach to manage all aspects of subcontracted work.

Attachments:

1- Revised Solicitation Cover Page

2- Responses to bidders’ queries (1 Page)

3- Non-Process Facilities Master Plan (36 Pages)

4- Summary of confirmation of interest Prime/Sub (1 page).

~ END OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 ~


Addendum 2

April 23, 2020 of 7

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

RFP FOR NFPM AGREEMENT DCFA #504-WSA

i

District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water)

Non-Process Facilities Program Manager A-E Services

RFP Number: DCFA #504-WSA RFP Due Date and

Time: 14 May-2020, 2:00 PM ET Date Issued: March 24, 2020

Description: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, AGREEMENT DCFA #504-WSA

DC Water Point of Contact (POC): Revised Submission Instructions:

Name: Narcisse Atchamou Title: Category Manager, Capital Programs Email: [email protected]

Electronic Submission of Proposals as instructed on Section 8.3

Revised Timeline (Estimated)*

RFP Advertisement 24-Mar-2020

Pre-Proposal Conference 14-Apr-2020, 10:00 AM – 12:00PM Teleconference

Deadline to submit questions 17-Apr-2020

Technical Proposals Due Date 14-May-2020, 2:00:00 PM ET

Evaluation Committee Shortlists Firms Jun-2020

Interviews Jun-2020

Price Proposals Due Date for Shortlisted Firms Jul-2020

Selection Notification Aug-2020

Board Approval Sep-2020

NTP Sep-2020

*Dates may change at DC Water's Convenience


Queries Reference Description Responses

1 Can you tell me if my company or team has a “Conflict of Interest” for this solicitation? In order for DC Water to determine if your company or team has a conflict of interest, a “Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement” must be submitted

with your Technical Proposal.

Conflicts of Interest include but are not limited to (a) current contracts with DC Water which may give a company an unfair or unethical advantage in

the award of this contract (DCFA-504-WSA), (b) any past, present, or planned contractual or employment relationships with any DC Water member,

officer, or employee; and (c) any other circumstances that might be considered to create a financial interest in the contract by any DC Water member,

officer, or employee if Proposer is awarded the Contract.

DC Water cannot comment on the existence of an organizational conflict of interest without knowing more information. However, if there is the

possibility of such a present or future conflict with your team (either your firm, your joint venture partners, or your subconsultants), you are obligated

to disclose the potential or existing conflict in the Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement contained in the RFP. That Statement identifies the

potential or existing conflict and allows the proposer to fully explain how the conflict will be mitigated or eliminated. DC Water will evaluate the conflict

and the explanation, and if necessary, determine a remedy to the conflict.

2 Is a DC Professional Engineer License required to be submitted with my Proposal? A DC Professional Engineer License is required to perform the work and may be provided by the Prime Consultant or by a Sub-Consultant. Proposers

who do not currently have a DC Professional Engineer License must demonstrate in their Technical Proposal the ability to acquire a License within a

reasonable period of time after Notice of Award and prior to Contract Execution.

3 Is a DC Business License Required to be submitted with my proposal? A DC Business License is required from the Prime Consultant prior to the contract execution. Proposers who do not currently have DC Business

License must demonstrate in their Technical Proposal the ability to acquire a License within a reasonable period of time after Notice of Award and

prior to Contract Execution.

4 Do joint ventures have to be established in the District of Columbia before submitting the proposal or

it could be done at the time of award to avoid unnecessary cost and paperwork?

Joint Ventures will need to be registered in the District of Columbia no later than the contract award. Refer to Question 3.

5 My business has a DBE/CBE certification does this meet the requirements? For the purposes of the EPA fair share objectives, to be counted towards the MBE or WBE goals, a firm must have an active certification from one of

the following:

1. Any Department of Transportations, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Certification.

2. The Small Business Administration’s 8(a) Program

3. The Small Business Administration’s Small Disadvantaged Business.6 Does a certified DBE with the District of Columbia Department of Transportation meet EPA Fair

Share Objective?

This certification would count towards goal.

7 Is the Virginia Department of Small Business and Supplier Diversity’s, “Small, Women and Minority”

certification program acceptable?

The Virginia Department of Small Business and Supplier Diversity’s, “Small, Women and Minority” certification program is acceptable.

8 During Industry Day, it was communicated that DC Water is planning to contract with a small

business for this project. However, there is no mention of this in the RFP document. Does DC

Water still intend to select a small business for this contract?

DC Water does not have a set-aside component to its fairshare objectives. However, it is the expectation that meaningful MBE/WBE participation will

happen on this project. Moreover, while DC Water strongly encourages certified firms to bid and participate at all tiers on this project, non-certified

firms are eligible to bid as primes.

9 Page 12, Section 6.3.1 requires engineering personnel to be DC licensed PEs. Does this

requirement also apply to non-engineering staff such as the Program Manager, Construction

Manager, Cost Estimator, etc.?

The non-engineering staff is not required to have a Professional Engineering license.. Refer to Question No. 2

10 Contract page A-8, the salary review thresholds seem low for this type of work. Is Table 1 current? The Job Classification and Hourly Salary Review Thresholds are correct as shown. These are thresholds and not Salary Caps. Proposed salaries

above these thresholds will require DC Water's review and approval. Refer to RFP Appendix 9 - Exhibit A - General Provisions Section 6.3 A-9.

11 If a subconsultant is awarded work for this Contract (DFCA-405-WSA), would they be able to

propose and be awarded work under future design services and construction management services

contracts?

Program Manager Subconsultant may be considered for Design Consultant or Construction Manager contracts as Prime or Sub Consultants. See

response to question No 1. However, the Prime Consultant awarded this contract shall not be considered for Design or Construction Management

contracts.

12 There are multiple forms in Appendix 4 that require a notary. Due to the submission being electronic

and given the current COVID-19 situation, can the notary requirement be waived for the forms that

require them? Pages in the RFP where there are notary requirements include:

•Pg. 47: Non-Collusion Affidavit

•Pg. 50: Certification Regarding Debarment Suspension Ineligibility and Voluntary

•Pg. 51: District of Columbia-Water and Sewer Authority Certification Regarding a Drug Free

Workplace

•Pg. 52: Tax Certification Affidavit

Documents may notarized or, in lieu of a notary public, may be witnessed by a third party. Witnessed signatures must include printed full name,

address, and contact information of the person providing the witness signature.

13 DCFA 504-WSA A-E Services is for Program Management of Non-Process Facilities Capital

Program Management. The Program Manager is responsible to plan and manage the program and

will not be involved in design or stamping the drawings. Do we have to submit the proposal under

the Professional Corporation registered in DC?

While Program Management is the primary, baseline task for this agreement, there may be tasks that include design or CM work. It is necessary for

an RFP responder to have appropriately registered in DC PE and Architect on their team. This does not mean the lead has to be DC registered PE

or Architect. Does mean they need those appropriately certified team members on their team.

14 On page 19 of the RFP, under Section 8.3 Bid Submission chart, item 3 provides the delivery point

of contact as Rudy Gonzalez c/o Esther Garrett; however, on page 14, it references the point of

contact listed on the cover page of the RFP as Narcisse Atchamou. Please confirm who the correct

point of contact is and their email address if the proposal is to be submitted via email.

Narcisse Atchamou, Procurement

[email protected] / (202) 787-2185

1385 Canal Street SE, Washington D.C., 20003.

15 The published RFP states that key engineer personnel must be licensed professional engineers in

DC. Can personnel who have VA and MD PE licenses obtain DC PE license after the award or mark

the PE license as pending in the proposal?

Washington District of Columbia Professional Engineers License is required at least for one (1) key personnel. If other key personnel on your team

hold Professional Engineer Licenses in other jurisdictions, you may provide these as in your response to document your team's qualifications and

expertise. See Question No. 2.

16 Does DC Water require three references for each key staff? No reference required for Key Personnel. Use Standard Form 330 (Rev 8/2016) page 2 – Section E - Resumes of Key Personnel proposed for this

Contract. However, there are Projects reference required. Please provide maximum five (5) for each Key Personnel.

17 There is no page limit identified for item 4.2 “list of all proposal subconsultants, description of their

roles, and proposal percentage of the work”. Could you please provide page limit for item 4.2?

No page limit is required.

18 We understand that the proposal follows SF 330 format. Are we required to fill out Form 330 Part 2? Technical Proposal shall include completed standard forms as follows:

Organizational Chart of proposed Team: use Standard Form 330-16f Section G

Key Personnel Resumes: use Standard Form 330 (Rev 8/2016) page 2 – Section E - Resumes of Key Personnel proposed for this Contract.

Firm Experiences: use Standard Form 330 (Rev 8/2016) page 3 – SECTION F - Example Projects which best illustrate proposed team’s qualifications

for this Contract

19 Is there a limit on the number of key staff to be provided in Section E and G or can we provide as

many staff as we need?

The required Key Personnel for this project is as follows: a) Project Director, b) Project Manager, c) Program Manager.

20 Would it be acceptable to use a 11x17 paper size instead of 8.5x11 for the organizational chart? Please follow paper size indicated in the RFP.

21 If a prime firm is a MBE do they count towards a certain percentage of the 28% MBE requirement. A certified firm can bid as a prime contractor, in which case their participation can be counted towards the goal. However, a certified prime is not

exempt from the good faith efforts requirements and must still outreach to the certified business community for its subcontracting opportunities.

22 Are firms required to submit Appendix 5 and 6 with the proposal submission. Price Proposals shall be submitted ONLY BY SHORTLISTED FIRMS who shall receive separate notification and instruction.

23 When submitting Appendix 5, can additional categories be added to the list of staff classification

categories listed on Appendix 5.

Proposals may include additional Categories. However, the Proposal must address the Categories listed on Appendix 5.

24 Page 8, Section 5.1.2 – Will the Consultant’s oversight during the design and construction phase be

in conjunction with or in lieu of DC Water staff Project Managers? Will the Consultant be responsible

for performing tasks that are inherent Government actions?

Depending on the oversight work, it may be done in conjunction with DC Water staff or it may be done in lieu of DC Water staff. Examples: The

program manager may review a pay application and make recommendation to DC Water staff for payment, but approval of the payment will be for DC

Water Staff. The program manager may review a design in lieu of DC Water staff performing the review.

25 Page 8, Section 5.1.2 – Will the Consultant’s oversight be for all projects that are on-going or

beginning at the time of the award of this contract?

Depending on work load at the time that the program management contract comes on line there may be opportunity for the program manager to

provide support for existing projects.

26 , Section 5.4.1 – Please define “critical duties” as stated. It is expected that the team being proposed by responders has expertise in non-process facilities related planning and management. For this RFP

critical duties will come up on an as needed bases and could mean duties such as representing the Facilities Department in budget planning meetings

or for example representing DC Water for permit related review or presentation to DCRA, CFA or SHPO.

27 Page 9, Section 5.4.2 – Please define how many years of experience DC Water determines to be

acceptable for a project manager to be qualified as “experienced”.

Project manager experience required is on an as needed basis. It will depend upon the project or task that could have needs that range from junior

level skills through senior level skills. For example, a junior level person with minimal project management experience ( 1 to 10 years) may be needed

for a data collection project, but senior level experience (10+ years) may be needed for interaction with permitting agencies, negotiation or facilities

management program direction.

28 Page 11, Section 5.8- Will the DC Water provided field office space be furnished, provide office

equipment ie. Computer/laptop, printers, copiers, provide access to high-speed wifi connectivity?

Yes.

29 Page 11, Section 5.8- With consideration to Covid-19 CDC guidelines and public health concerns,

will off-site work be permissible if there is no additional cost to DC Water?

Yes. COVID related social distancing will be expected and accommodated.

30 Appendix 10 and 11 mention permit expediting services. Is the Consultant to provide permit

expediting services for DC Water Non-Process Facility projects?

The proposer is not expected to have permit expeditor on their team, but they should have relative, recent experience with procurement and

management of permit expeditor services in DC.

31 Section 7.5 Evaluation Criteria section shows 10 criteria and each criteria has its own points

allocated. However, Items 5 and 7 with 10% and 20% respectively have not been assigned a section

or page limit. Please advise us regarding which sections those items should be included to secure

the points or we should use additional pages for those items. The Section 8.2 proposal sections and

contents does not list where to include them.

Refer to Solicitation Addendum no. 1, Rev. B Section 7 Instructions to Bidders, paragraph 7.5 Evaluation Criteria & Weights

Item 4: The firm’s familiarity with types of problems applicable to the Scope of Work listed above; 10%

Item 6: The firms proposed method to accomplish the work addressing the variety of technical requirements, physical locations, and stakeholders;

20% . These items are to be included in the Technical Approach of your Proposal and 2 pages each.

32 Will this contract require review of work by the AE firms during the design contracts and/or

geotechnical services?

The contract work may include review of work and geotechnical engineering services.

33 Is there a timeline for these upcoming contracts from designs and CM? Solicitations for Design Services shall be published after award of DCFA-504-WSA. Solicitations for Construction Management Services shall be

published after award of design services.

34 Can you elaborate on the 5% evaluation points, associated with the subcontracting and compliance?

Are you looking for how the MBE/WBE participation is being addressed? Or something else?

Proposals shall be evaluated based on the proposed percentage of work performed by MBE/WBE subcontractors, and the proposed approach to

manage all aspects of subcontracted work.

35 What level of design scope do you expect from your program management consultant? Typically initial concept design (15% to 30% design) but may include up to 100% design work.

36 Are there any preference points for MBE/WBE serving as prime? No.

DC Water

ADDENDUM 2: DCFA#504-WSA - 04/22/2020

Page 1 4/22/20203:01 PM

Prepared for:Warehouse and Visitor’s & Security Center

The District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority

NON-PROCESS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

By:

s e r v i ce • d e s i g n • s u cce s s

Revised - July 10, 2013Approved by DC Water Board - September 5, 2013

iNON-PROCESS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary

About DC Water 1Acknowledgements 1Background / History 2Goals and Benefits 3Methodology 4Phasing and Timeline 5

DC Water Facilities

DC Water Sites Map 6Blue Plains Water Treatment Facility 7 - 8 A. Central Maintenance Facility (CMF) 9 - 10 B. Central Operations Facility (COF) 11 - 12 C. Warehouse and Visitor’s & Security Center 13 - 14

Customer Care and Operations Facilities 15 D. Bryant Street Pump Station 16 - 17 E. Fort Reno Pump Station 18 - 19 F. Anacostia Pump Station 20 - 21 G. Leased office space 22 - 23 H. Main and O Street Campus 24 - 25

I. Main and O Street Campus - Proposed 26 - 28

Conclusion 29 - 30

Appendices I - Green Strategies and Sustainable Design 31 II - Public Transportation Accessibility 32 III - Main and O Street Campus Economic Redevelopment Schematic Site Plan 33

NON-PROCESS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

About DC Water

Acknowledgments

DC Water distributes drinking water and collects and treats wastewater for more than 600,000 residential, commercial and governmental customers in the District of Columbia. DC Water also provides wholesale wastewater treatment services for a population of 1.6 million in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland, and Fairfax and Loudoun counties in Virginia. DC Water is proud to provide these vital, safe, and high-quality services to our customers, while also protecting and enhancing our environment.

To distribute drinking water, DC Water operates more than 1,300 miles of pipes, four pumping stations, five reservoirs, four elevated water storage tanks, 36,000 valves and 9,100 public hydrants. To collect wastewater, DC Water operates 1,800 miles of sanitary and combined sewers, 22 flow-metering stations, and nine off-site wastewater pumping stations. To treat wastewater, DC Water operates the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant, the largest advanced wastewater treatment facility in the world.

The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan is the work of many individuals who contributed their time, comments and ideas throughout the revision process, in order to best address the needs of DC Water now and in the future. Sincere thanks goes to the following people for their support and assistance: George Hawkins, Leonard Benson, Maureen Holman, Constance Schwartz, Steve Caldwell, David McLaughlin, Ernest Jolly and Charles Kiely; Paul Falkenbury, Omari Davis, Randy Morrison, Sandra Wu, and Amy McCarty.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Background/History on the Non-Process Facilities Master PlanData for this Non-Process Facilities Master Plan is based on information originally collected from 2006-2009 for the DC Water Master Facilities Plan (FINAL – April 14, 2010; hereinafter “2010 Master Facilities Plan”), and it included the following activities:

1. Tours of all non-process facilities.2. Detailed interviews of DC Water management and staff.3. Distribution, collection, and analysis of “Office Space Information Forms” questionnaires completed by each DC Water department and/ or division head.4. Field investigations and measurements of all important DC Water buildings at Blue Plains Treatment Plant, Bryant St. Pumping Station, Fort Reno Pumping Station, Main & O Street Pumping Station, 810 First St. Customer Services, and Anacostia Pumping Station.5. Analysis of available as-built architectural drawings of existing buildings and site plan drawings of existing properties, as provided by DC Water.6. Analysis of previous studies and designs for Main & O St., as prepared by Samaha Associates, P.C.

DC Water began implementing the priority recommendations from the 2010 Master Facilities Plan, which included the conversion of the warehouse storage space at the Central Maintenance Facility (CMF) into office for the Clean Rivers Project, and the construction of new central Warehouse and Visitor/Security facility. However, as work was undertaken on these projects, DC Water continued to analyze the entire organization’s space needs and developed a holistic strategy for coordinating with historic preservation and permitting authorities in order to advance DC Water facility objectives. In addition, during this time the Main Sewage Pumping Station was listed in the D.C. Inventory of Historic Sites in 2012, and subsequently designated a National Historic Landmark. Consequently it has been determined that the 2010 Master Plan was not utilizing DC Water facilities for their highest/best use and did not fully account for permitting and historic preservation challenges.

The analysis undertaken by DC Water since the completion of the 2010 Master Facilities Plan determined the current needs at the Central Operations Facility (COF) are greater than originally estimated; as the limited scope of planned expansion would not alleviate the growing space problems at Blue Plains. It also became very clear during the analysis that one of the most critical assets of DC Water is the Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant at Blue Plains, and it is extremely important to protect DC Water’s ability to meet future demands by maintaining greater space flexibility at Blue Plains.

Management has identified the following risks at Blue Plains:1. Construction projects have taken up most of the available land at Blue Plains – limited availability for future process improvements if required by permit or desired for innovation.2. Limited ability at Blue Plains to manage risks and mitigate accidents or safety problems caused by operations or natural disasters.3. No available room for expansion of non-process facilities at Blue Plains.

These projects and risks will continue to expand, resulting in the need to consolidate non-process related functions or host them off-site.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Non-Process Facilities Master Plan Goals & BenefitsThe Non-Process Facilities Master Plan should be viewed as a “living document”—something drafted with the ability to respond to change. As a result, many of the goals from the 2010 Master Facilities Plan are retained and combined with a host of new priorities to be addressed. The goals of the Non-Process Facilities Master Plan are listed below:

1. Optimize efficient use of existing DC Water land.2. Optimize efficient use of existing DC Water facilities.3. Introduce state-of-the-art material management technologies that will enhance inventory security, inventory storage and distribution, transportation, and reduce duplication and inefficiencies of human resources.4. Implement Green Strategies and Sustainable Design within DC Water infrastructure and facility planning. • Emphasizestormwatermanagementandenergyalternatives/efficiencieswhileimplementingGreenBuildingpolicies. • ReduceriskfromemergenciesandpotentialclimatechangeimpactsatDCWaterfacilitieswheneverfeasible. • StandardizefixturesandfinishesacrossDCWaterfacilities.5. Maximize flexibility throughout DC Water facilities for future treatment needs, distribution system operations, and innovative opportunities.

Revision of the master plan presents DC Water with the opportunity to both assess what has been accomplished since the release of the 2010 Master Facilities Plan as well as update the plan with consideration of the Authority’s current operational and fiscal priorities. The expected benefits from the Non-Process Facilities Master Plan are as follows:

• ComportswiththestrategicplanoftheDCWaterBoardofDirectors,BlueHorizon2020.• Reservesspace/facilitiesatBluePlainsforexpansionofwatertreatmentprocesses,allowingforsafeandefficientuseoftheplantwell into the future.• Leveragesnearly$2Mperyearfromnotleasingspacetooffsetdebtservicecosts.• ProvidesincreasedfocusonengineeringoversightandqualitycontrolatBluePlains.• Optimizesoperationalefficienciesandimproveresponsetimetocustomers.ReservespaceandfacilitiesforstrategicallyplacedWater & Sewer satellite field operations by consolidating all of Water & Sewer.• ConsolidatesAdministrativefunctionsinonelocation,withfullcontroloverbuildingdesignandoperations.• LimitsriskexposuretoBluePlains,thelargestindustrialcomplexintheDistrictofColumbia,toessentialwastewatertreatmentand engineering personnel.• Operationalsavingsexpectedfromhigherperformingfacilities,greenbuildingeffortsshouldreducebothwaterandenergy consumption in non-process facilities.• Consistencyintheleveloffixtures,finishesandfurnishingtoalldepartments,whichimprovesmoraleandthefeelingofunityamong DC Water personnel.• Expandscommutingoptions,optimizingexistingMetrotransit/busroutesbylocatingthemajorityofadministrativepersonnelina central DC location.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Background information for this Non-Process Facilities Master Plan is based on information from the original 2010 Master Facilities Plan. Additional information has been gleaned from tours of DC Water facilities and documentation of specific DC Water projects undertaken subsequent to the 2010 plan.

Many disparate factors were studied in the preparation of the Non-Process Facilities Master Plan, including:

1. Physical condition of existing buildings and sites, including potential renovation and maintenance costs. Assessments include evaluations of: a. Building envelope. b. HVAC and energy consumption. c. Security issues. d. Structural issues. e. Site space constraints. f. Interior and exterior circulation patterns, including vehicular circulation and ADA accessibility.2. Operational processes currently used by DC Water, and planned changes to these processes in the future. This includes the interrelationships of each department, and their day-to-day functions.3. Overcrowding of various departments, and planning for future growth.4. Creation of an environment that has visual appeal and community access that fits within the context of surrounding neighborhoods.5. Sustainability goals, including long-term financial and risk management implications.

Methodology


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Phasing and TimelineProject Project Year(s) Page Reference

Clean Rivers/DETS Offices at the Central Maintenance Facility (CMF Warehouse Conversion)

Completed (2011) 9

Customer Service Center Relocation (80 M Street, SE) Completed (2012) 22Warehouse and Visitor’s & Security Center Ongoing (2011-2013) 13New Administrative Headquarters Building Ongoing (2013-2016) 26Customer Business Office (810 First Street, NE) Lease space to be

maintained22

Permitting Services (1100 Fourth Street, SW) Lease space to be maintained

22

Fleet Maintenance Facility Pending 24Sewer Services Facility Pending 24, 26Bryant Street Pump Station (Central DC Satellite Ops) 2016 16Fort Reno Pump Station (Western DC Satellite Ops) 2016 18

Anacostia Pump Station (Eastern DC Satellite Ops) 2016 20CMF Consolidation 2016 9Central Operations Facility (COF) 2016 11

6

DC WATER FACILITIES


DC Water Sites

A,B,C

FH,I

G1G3

G2

D

E

Blue Plains, Central Maintenance Facility (CMF)Page 9Blue Plains, Central Operations Facility (COF)Page 11Warehouse and Visitor’s & Security CenterPage 13Bryant Street Pump StationPage 16Fort Reno Pump StationPage 18Anacostia Pump StationPage 2080 M Street, SEPage 22810 First Street, NEPage 221100 Fourth Street, SWPage 22Main and O Street Campus - Existing Site ConditionsPage 24Main and O Street Campus - ProposedPage 26

A)

B)

C)

D)

E)

F)

G1)

G2)

G3)

H)

I)

District of Columbia Aerial Map

7

DC WATER FACILITIES


DC WATER FACILITIES

Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant | Proposed Site Plan

7

1

20

19

1817

16

15

14

30

28

11

10

9

1329

21

23

22

2524

2726

8

6

12

24

3

5

Non-process Facilities

NORTH-SOUTH ROAD

PERIMETER ROAD EAST

PERIMETER ROAD NORTH

SOLI

DS

ROA

D

AER

ATIO

N R

OA

D

OPE

RATI

ON

S RO

AD

8

DC WATER FACILITIES


DC WATER FACILITIES

Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment PlantThe following projects have been undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2010 Master Facilities Plan:

• ConstructionofWarehouseandVisitor’s&SecurityCenter.• Build-outofofficespaceinCMFforCleanRiversandDETSstaff.

Facility Objective(s):The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan identifies the following objectives for these facilities:

1. Create space flexibility for Blue Plains wastewater treatment processes.2. Create consolidated space for DC Water engineering staff and consultants.3. Improve safety and limit risk exposure at Blue Plains to critical staff and contractors.

Proposed Modifications:The following modifications are proposed to assist DC Water in achieving these objectives:

1. Remove maximum feasible amount of trailers from Blue Plains.2. Remove Supply Building #1 and aging buildings along North-South Road.3. Remove Supply Building #2.4. Continue to consolidate and renovate the Central Maintenance Facility (CMF). 5. Renovate and reorganize the Central Operations Facility (COF).

Non

-pro

cess

Faci

litie

s

# Facility/Project # Facility/Project # Facility/Project

1 Guard House 11 Grit Chamber Building #1 21 Weighing Station

2 COF Renovations 12 Laboratory 22 Total Nitrogen Project

3 Warehouse and Visitor Security Building 13 Primary Sludge Screening & Degritting Bldg 23 Digester Project

4 IT Building 14 Chemical Building 24 Remove Supply Building #1

5 Central Maintenance Facility (CMF) projects 15 Dewatered Sludge Loading Facility 25 Future Processes

6 (Abandoned) Visitor Center 16 Solids Building 26 Remove Supply Building #2

7 Grit Chamber Building #2 17 Denitrification Control Building 27 Future Processes

8 Raw Wastewater Pump Station #2 18 Nitrification Control Building 28 Chlorination Building

9 GSLS-2 19 Lime Storage and Feed Building 29 Clean Rivers Project

10 GSLS-1 20 Nitrification Blower Building 30 Secondary Blower Building

9

DC WATER FACILITIES


A. Central Maintenance Facility (CMF) | Existing Plans# Facility/Project

1 Central Maintenacne Facililty (CMF)

Lab

Chemical Building

1

1

2

3

2

3

10

DC WATER FACILITIES


A. Central Maintenance Facility (CMF)The Central Maintenance Facility (CMF) has undergone numerous modifications through the years, including those related to the 2010 Master Facilities Plan (see below). However, much of the facility remains under or inefficiently utilized. For example, much of the first floor is composed of maintenance shops; services performed in these shops are no longer provided by the Authority. The shops simultaneously present inefficient space and an opportunity to provide space for functions that are currently located in obsolete building (specifically BP#1 and BP#2). The following modifications have been undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2010 Master Facilities Plan:

• CleanRiversoffices,reusing37,500SFofformerwarehousespace.• TechnologyInformationCenter(TIC)officespacemodernization.


1. Efficiently utilize abundance of space in CMF to house contractors at Blue Plains; thereby, freeing up the plant for expansion of water treatment processes. 2. Consolidate the remaining maintenance shop functions to provide much-needed space for the Department of Facilities.


1. Convert excess break rooms, locker rooms, and restrooms on mezzanine level to offices.2. Move DETS to the Central Operations Facility (COF).3. Reduce the total amount of shop area by combining like functions, or eliminating shops where work is now provided by third-party contractors, and removing unnecessary stored materials.4. Relocate the grounds maintenance shop from Supply Building #2 to the first floor.5. Relocate the employee uniform processing/distribution center from Supply Building #2 to the first floor and mezzanine.

11

DC WATER FACILITIES


# Facility/Project

1 Central Operations Facililty (COF)

IT Building

(Abandoned) Visitor Center

B. Central Operations Facility (COF) | Existing Site Plan

3

1

1

2

3

2

I-295 I-295

12

DC WATER FACILITIES


B. Central Operations Facility (COF)DC Water’s administration functions have outgrown their current home in the COF. Planning and design of new Administrative Headquarters building at the Main and O Street Campus is presently underway. Once complete, administrative functions, unrelated or non-critical to the plant’s functions will move to the new building. And functions that are presently forced to operate from remote or temporary facilities, will be properly housed in a modernized COF.


1. Utilize the Central Operations Facility as the operations center for Blue Plains as originally intended.2. Efficiently organize space vacated after the central administration’s move to the New Administrative Headquarters Building.


Site:1. Demolish IT Building, making space available for additional parking.

Building:1. Renovate (Interior space) office areas as follows: • GeneralManager’sOffice(1,930SF) • Procurement(5,485SF) • Entire3rdFloor(9,864SF):AGM,HumanCapitalManagement,LawOffices,OfficesofChiefofStaff • Entire4thFloor(11,943SF):BoardRoom,Finance,Payroll,RiskManagement,InternalAudit,CFO • 5thfloor–(11,943SF)DETS2. Add enlarged IT server.3. Renovate Facilities Department’s area (4,464 SF); Facilities Department to remain at the COF.4. Relocate the following programs to the modernized COF. • DETS(fromtheCMF/NitrificationBlowerBuilding) • IT(fromITBuilding) • Consultants(fromBluePlainstrailers)5. Shared space for use by Staff coming to Blue Plains from Administrative Building • GeneralManager • GeneralCounsel

• ChiefFinancialOfficer • FlexSpace–SharedCubicles

13

DC WATER FACILITIES


C. Warehouse and Visitor Security Building | Site Plan# Facility/Project

1 Warehouse and Visitor Security Building

Guardhouse and Canopy

1

1

2

2

14

DC WATER FACILITIES


C. Warehouse and Visitor Security BuildingThe DC Water Warehouse and Visitor’s & Security Center at Blue Plains consists of a one-story 20,000 SF state-of-the-art warehouse facility and a two-story 10,000 SF visitor’s center &-security building. This new facility will serve as DC Water’s primary location for receiving, processing, tracking, storage, retrieval, and distribution of parts and supplies. The visitor’s center will serve as the primary point of entry into the plant. The security offices along with the command center oversee all of DC Water’s security at the plant and throughout areas served by DC Water. Construction is estimated to be completed in fall 2013.


1. Streamline the receipt and distribution of materials.2. Improve the security of materials management.3. Energy efficiency will be incorporated into the design, reducing long-term maintenance problems and life-cycle costs.4. Remove or consolidate existing storage areas scattered among multiple DC Water facilities.


None at this time

15

DC WATER FACILITIES


Customer Care and Operations FacilitiesFacilities Objective(s):The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan identifies the following objectives for these facilities:

1. Determine the highest & best use of DC Water property throughout the distribution system to serve our customers most efficiently.2. Expand public transportation options.3. Account for facilities and assets that may have historic character and importance.


1. Create satellite operations of Water Service and Sewer Service in order to provide effective geographic coverage and improve response times. 2. Reorganize and redevelop existing DC Water sites to create a more efficient use of space. 3. Limit and reduce dependency of leased office space. 4. Assess historic properties and analyze limits of alteration and modification.

16

DC WATER FACILITIES


D. Bryant Street Pump Station | Existing Site Plan

BRYANT STREETPUMP STATION

WAREHOUSE

PIPEYARD

200 BRYANTSTREET

HOWARDUNIVERSITY

WASHINGTONMETROPOLITAN HIGH SCHOOL

DISTRIBUTIONSHOP

Bryant Street, NW

Adams Street, NW

Drive, NWMcMillian

2nd

Stre

et, N

W

17

DC WATER FACILITIES


D. Bryant Street Pump StationBryant Street is composed of multiple properties including the water pumping station, the warehouse, the distribution building, as well as the warehouses and pipe yard at 200 Bryant Street. The sites are variously underutilized and/or in disrepair. This fact, coupled with vast and varied spaces of the facility creates an excellent opportunity to develop a multifunctional facility located centrally in the District. However, there are two critical limitations—any modification or addition must consider the historic nature of the Bryant Street Pump Station as well as the facility’s location adjacent to Howard University and the Washington Metropolitan High School.


1. Utilize vast and varied spaces at Bryant Street for DC Water’s various Customer Care and Operations requirements. 2. Develop satellite facility for central District of Columbia.3. Simultaneously maintain the Bryant Street Pump Station’s historic character and DC Water’s expanding critical functions


1. Renovate and reorganize first floor of the Pumping Station.2. Renovate and reorganize spaces to accommodate the following functions: • LabforWaterQualitydivisionfromFortReno. • WaterandSewerInvestigationandRepairsatellitecrewsservingcentralDC. • Satellitewarehousefacilitiesandmeterstorage.5. Improve HVAC/Energy Design within the pump station (all floors) to include better efficiency and redundancies for emergency situations.6. Repair roof parking ramp to Warehouse/Meter Services Building.7. Evaluate 200 Bryant Street for potential use(s).

18

DC WATER FACILITIES


E. Fort Reno Pump Station | Existing Site Plan

PUMPSTATION

ABANDONED PUMP HOUSE & WATER TOWER

WATER TOWER

REMOVE TRAILOR

DEMOLISH BUILDING

DEMOLISH ABANDONED PUMP STATION

NEW VEGETATIVE ROOF

Donaldson Place, NWDerussey Street, NW

WATER-SEWER SERVICES SATELLITE

FACILITY

19

DC WATER FACILITIES


E. Fort Reno Pump StationThe Fort Reno site is a seven acre industrial campus, with a collection of buildings in various states of adaptive reuse, disrepair, and/or abandon. Thus, while existing conditions pose a maintenance burden, the site itself provides an opportunity to efficiently house the functions as proposed in development of a western DC satellite crew site. Establishment will consist of new construction, renovation, and strategic demolition in concert with the site’s historic character. Facility Objective(s):The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan identifies the following objectives for these facilities:

1. Develop satellite facility for western District of Columbia.2. Assess and analyze the extent of historic preservation required on the site.


1. Construct a building for a Satellite Office serving western DC. 2. Demolish existing office building.3. Demolish abandoned pump station.4. Remove temporary trailer.5. “Mothball” abandoned pump house and water tower as well as any structures requiring preservation on site.6. Add vegetative roof atop the reservoir.

20

DC WATER FACILITIES


F. Anacostia Pump Station | Existing Site Plan

PUMP STATION

ABANDONEDPUMP STATION

DPW PROPERTY

MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL YARD

R Street, SE, NW

Alley

18th

Str

eet,

SE, N

W

Minnesota Avenue, SE,

19th

Str

eet,

SE, N

W

WATER-SEWER SERVICES SATELLITE

FACILITY

21

DC WATER FACILITIES


F. Anacostia Pump StationThe Anacostia site is home to a new pumping station as well as an abandoned, historically relevant pump station. Dating from 1912, the abandoned pump station has accumulated multiple additions since its original construction. These additions lack historical value and will be demolished, both to lessen DC Water’s maintenance burden and create space for a new Water-Sewer Services satellite facility. A new structure will be built because renovated space in the abandoned pump station would not satisfy the requirements of the satellite facility.


1. Develop satellite facility for eastern District of Columbia.2. Access and analyze the extent of historic preservation required on the site.


1. Construct a building for a Satellite Facility serving eastern DC. 2. “Mothball” historically relevant abandoned pump station.3. Demolish abandoned pumping station additions.

22

DC WATER FACILITIES


G. Leased Office Space | Location PlanF1) 80 M Street, SE - Customer ServiceF2) 810 First Street, NW? - Customer ServiceF3) Fourth Street, SW - Permitting

G1G3

G2

23

DC WATER FACILITIES


G. Leased Office Space | Summary of Recommendations DC Water currently leases three offices scattered across the District of Columbia; (for locations, see previous page).While costly, these spaces serve their given function, and can serve as the public “face” of the authority. The new Administrative Headquarters Building will also serve as the public “face” of the authority and eliminates the need for a portion of the leased space. Its design includes provisions for the Customer Service Center and Customer Business Office. Permitting Services will remain at 1100 Fourth Street in order to foster collaboration with DCRA’s permitting services while providing “one-stop” permit services for DC residents and developers. Future leased space allocation is as follows:

G1) 80 M Street, SE - Customer Service Center Moves to New New Administrative HeadquartersG2) 810 First Street, NE - Customer Business Office Moves to New New Administrative HeadquartersG3) 1100 Fourth Street, SW - Permit Services Remains in current location

The following modifications have been undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2010 Master Facilities Plan:• RelocationoftheCustomerServicesDepartmentfrom810FirstStreetto80MStreet.

Facility Objective(s):The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan identifies the following objectives for eliminating a large portion of the current leased space:

1. Save operating money annually by not leasing space.2. Provide public accessibility by locating the offices near public transportation and related District services.


1. Relocate Customer Service Center from leased space to the New Administrative Headquarters Building.2. Relocate Customer Business Office from leased space to the New Administrative Headquarters Building.3. Maintain leased office space for Permitting Services adjacent to DCRA’s permitting services.

24

DC WATER FACILITIES


H. Main and O Street Campus | Existing Site Conditions# Facility/Project

1 Main Pump Station

O Street Pump Station

Sewer Services Modular Office

Fleet Building

Sewer Services Buildings

Welding Building

Building E (To be demolished)

Building F

Boat Building

Radio Shed

Trailer

Material Bins

Clean Rivers Project

1

1

2

3

13

1211

5

5

4

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

4

6 9

78 10

2

3

N Place, SE Cana

l Str

eet,

SE

1st S

tree

t, SE

25

DC WATER FACILITIES


H. Main and O Street Campus | Existing Site ConditionsThe existing Main and O Street Campus (Main and O) is currently home to Sewer Services, Maintenance Services, and Fleet Management. Myriad personnel and vehicles are housed in a collection of buildings in varying states of repair and usefulness. Some buildings such as the Main Pump Station and O Street Pump Station are integral components of DC Water’s operations, while others store materials or are otherwise underutilized. DC Water is faced with the challenge of how to use this valuable, centrally located site more efficiently. Additionally, the Main Pump Station is a National Historic Landmark. Whatever change occurs must respect its historical character.

The following modifications have been undertaken as part of the implementation of the 2010 Master Facilities Plan:• RelocationofSewerServices’officepersonnelinsitepreparationfortheCleanRiversexcavation.• Extensivesiteanalysis.• Accessandanalyzetheextentofhistoricpreservationrequiredonthesite.


1. Utilize vast and varied spaces at Main & O for DC Water’s various Customer Care and Operations requirements. 2. Access and analyze the extent of historic preservation required on the site.


1. Maintain function and accessibility of the of Main Pump Station and O Street Pump Station.

26

DC WATER FACILITIES


I. Main and O Street Campus | Proposed Site Plan# Facility/Project

1 Main Pump Station

Administrative Headquarters Building atop O Street Pump Station

Sewer Services Garage

Sewer Services Building 1

Sewer Services Building 2

Material Bins

Salt Hoppers

Boat Building

Unused boat slip, filled

1

1

3

4

5

5

4

6

7

8

9

9

8

2

2

6

7

3

Cana

l Str

eet,

SE

N Place, SE

1st S

tree

t, SE

SEWER SERVICESPARKING

27

DC WATER FACILITIES


I. Main and O Street Campus | Proposed Site PlanMain and O is undergoing a significant reorganization stemming from two projects—the construction of a new Administrative Headquarters Building and potential restructuring of Fleet Management. A new Administrative Building is planned to be built atop the O Street Pump Station. The new building, serving as the public “face” of DC Water, hosts administrative functions and non-essential plant personnel from Blue Plains as well as select functions from Main and O. Its construction is a significant step towards DC Water’s goal of preserving space at Blue Plains for the expansion of wastewater treatment processes, allowing for safe and efficient use of the plant well into the future.

A restructured Fleet Management operation may not be housed at Main and O, allowing more efficient use of DC Water’s valuable property adjacent to the Administrative Headquarters Building. Sewer Services remains on-site, collocated with the Maintenance Group, utilizing the vacated space, which is ideal—it is centrally located, containing the required four acres of surface lots and a 36,000 SF building for Sewer Services and the Maintenance Group’s parking, material storage, and administrative needs.

The functions housed in Sewer Services’ modular offices are relocated to the new Administrative Headquarters Building.


1. Develop New Administrative Headquarters Building atop the O Street Pumping Station.2. Access and analyze the extent of historic preservation required on the site.3. Analyze the potential impacts and adaptions that may be necessary to combat climate change and increased hazardous weather events.

28

DC WATER FACILITIES


The new Administrative Headquarters Building will host the following departments:

I. Main and O Street Campus

Department/Division Current LocationHuman Capital Management COFFacilities (Mailroom & Copy Center only) COFProcurement COFSecretary to the Board + Board of Directors COFOffice of the General Manager COFInternal Audit COFGeneral Counsel COFExternal Affairs COFFinance & Budget + Risk Management COFInformation Technology IT Building & COFCustomer Care and Operations (Water and Sewer Planning and Engineering)

Bryant Street, Main & O Street

Customer Service Department and Command Center 80 M Street


1. Maintain function and accessibility of the Main Pump Station and O Street Pump Station.2. Analyze the operational structure and future space requirements of Fleet Maintenance3. Build New Administrative Headquarters Building atop O Street Pump Station, including a lobby area with educational & historical highlights of DC Water operations4. Fill existing, unused boat slip and improve the condition of the protective seawall5. Reinforce underground structures as necessary.6. Utilize unused or underutilized space within the Main Pump Station, accommodating the following programs: • Firehydrantrepairgroup • Leadreplacementpersonnel7. Maintain/accommodate the following functions at the Main and O Campus: • Boatcrew8. Relocate administrative and non-process functions from Blue Plains (see table below).

CONCLUSION

29NON-PROCESS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

DC Water plays an integral role in the function of our nation’s capital—the authority collects and treats water for more than 600,000 DC customers and provides waste water services to another 1.6 million across both Maryland and Virginia. DC Water is proud to provide these vital, safe, and high-quality services to our customers, while also protecting and enhancing our environment.

The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan goals reflect DC Water’s continued commitment to being a “World-Class Utility”—the safest, most sustainable, and efficient water utility in the world.

1. Optimize efficient use of existing DC Water land.2. Optimize efficient use of existing DC Water facilities.3. Introduce state-of-the-art material management technologies that will enhance inventory security, inventory storage and distribution, transportation, and reduce duplication and inefficiencies of human resources.4. Implement green strategies and sustainable design within DC Water infrastructure and facility planning. • Emphasizestormwatermanagementandenergyalternatives/efficiencieswhileimplementingGreenBuildingpolicies. • ReduceriskfromemergenciesandpotentialclimatechangeimpactsatDCWaterfacilitieswheneverfeasible. • StandardizefixturesandfinishesacrossDCWaterfacilities.5. Maximize flexibility throughout DC Water facilities for future treatment needs, distribution system operations, and innovative opportunities.

CONCLUSION


DC Water’s Non-Process Facilities Master Plan also reflects a strong commitment to implementing the goals of Blue Horizon 2020, including but not limited to the following areas:

GOAL4 Enhancecustomer/stakeholderconfidence,communications,andperception: The Administrative Headquarters being centrally located greatly increases opportunities for DC Water to communicate and interact with our customers and the community.GOAL5 Assurefinancialsustainabilityandintegrity: Leveragesupto$2Mperyearfromrenttosupportdebtservice,whilefreeingupvitalspaceatBluePlainstosupportfuture treatment processes, which ensures greater financial integrity in the long-term.GOAL6 Assuresafetyandsecurity: Highlights the facilities that are publically accessible and safe for visitors, thus allowing DC Water to concentrate security resources on critical needs and infrastructure.GOAL8 Optimallymanageinfrastructure: Represents a major forward step by standardizing non-process facilities, thus eliminating a number of facilities maintenance challenges and reducing energy costs.GOAL9 Enhanceoperatingexcellencethroughinnovation,sustainability,andadoptionofbestpractices: Long-term sustainability and adoption of facilities best practices will directly enhance operating excellence.

The facility-specific objectives and proposed modifications herein prescribe the means to achieve DC Water’s goals. The Non-Process Facilities Master Plan presents DC Water with a creative, logical, and efficacious plan for the future. However, like all plans, this master plan is subject to the influence of the un-planned. In response, the Non-Process Facilities Master Plan should be used as a “living document”—something with the ability to respond to change in the environment, technology, economy, or demographics. Acknowledging this, the Non-Process Facilities Master Plan’s final “proposed modification” is that it be reviewed and updated every five (5) years in order to maintain its vitality and relevance.

APPENDIX


II

All design and construction activities associated with the Non-Process Facilities Master Plan implementation shall embrace sustainable design concepts through an integrated approach. Some of the elements to be addressed are:

1. Incorporation of USGBC LEED green building or equivalent rating systems. All new buildings shall be built to a minimum of LEED Silver specifications, with an emphasis on stormwater management and energy alternatives/efficiencies. 2. Reduction of risk from emergencies and potential climate change impacts at DC Water facilities whenever feasible3. Standardize fixtures, finishes and furnishings across DC Water facilities4. Mechanical and electrical alternatives incorporating energy conserving devices and systems.5. Natural environments instead of built amenities.6. Natural lighting and ventilation where cost effective.7. Natural vegetation instead of newly introduced vegetation.8. Selection of building materials as a means to complete the loop of recycling materials and reducing waste through re-use.9. Specification of renewable materials in lieu of harvested natural resources.10. Specification of local materials and thus eliminating additional delay, cost, and pollution associated with shipping. 11. Recycling of demolished paving and other demolition materials.12. Reduction of air pollution inside and outside buildings by specifying the volatile organic compound (VOC) limits and excluding harmful refrigerants such as HCFCs.13. Reduction of water consumption by specifying low flow fixtures and other water saving devices.14. Reduction of light pollution by selecting light fixtures with full cutoff to prevent up light and trespass beyond the project area.15. Facility commissioning mindful of the interdependence of building systems, functional testing, and adjusting and balancing requirements for the total project. 16. Long term maintenance and service programs to reduce energy and operating costs.

Green Strategies and Sustainable Design

APPENDIX


II II

Public Transportation Accessibility

DC Water Sites Rail BusNearest Metro

StationDistance*

(Miles)Metro Line Nearest Bus Stop Distance*

(Miles)Route Number

A-C Blue Plains Facilities5000 Overlook Avenue, SW

Anacostia 4.1 GREEN Overlook Ave. &Shepherd Pkwy, SW(Naval Research Lab)Blue Plains (A5 only)

0.25 A4, A5

C Bryant Street Pumping Station301 Bryant Street, NW

Shaw-Howard U

0.70 GREENYELLOW

Bryant St, NW & 2nd Street, NW

0.03 G2

D Fort Reno Pumping Station3900 Donaldson Place, NW

Tenleytown-AU

0.60 RED Wisconsin Ave, NW & Ellicott St, NW

0.11 31, 32, 36, 37, N2

E Anacostia Pumping Station1801 Minnesota Ave, SE

Anacostia 1.20 GREEN Minnesota Ave, SE &18th Street, SE

0.04 B2, U2

G1 80 M Street Customer Service80 M Street, SE

Navy Yard-Ballpark

0.11 GREEN 1st Street, SE & M Street, SE

0.03 PP6, V7, V8, V9

G2 810 First Street Customer Service810 First Street, NE

Union Station 0.20 RED N. Capitol St, NW & H Street, NW

0.16 80, 96, D4, D8, D3, X1, X2, X9

G3 Fourth Street - Permit Operations1100 Fourth Street, SW

Waterfront 0.03 GREEN 4th Street, SW & M Street, SW

0.03 74

H,I Main and O Street Campus125 O Street, SE

Navy Yard-Ballpark

0.35 GREEN 1st Street, SE & M Street, SE

0.29 P6, V7, V8, V9

Updated June 2013

APPENDIX


Main and O Street Campus Economic Redevelopment | Schematic Site Plan

GATE AND GUARDHOUSE

PROPOSEDTHEATER BUILDINGN PLACE, SE

2ND

STR

EE

T S

E

CA

NA

L S

TRE

ET

SE

(Priv

ate

RO

W)

O STREET, SE

TRUCKACCESS

GATE

GATE

FILL EXIST BOAT SLIP

SETBACK LINE

PROPERTY LINE

TRUCK RESTRICTION ZONE

PROPOSED LOADING DOCK LOCATION

PROPOSED NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

UNDERGROUND PIPING

TRUCK TURNING RADIUS

PROPOSED RELOCATED TRANSFORMERS

PROPOSED TRUCK ACCESS

TRUCK RESTRICTION

ZONE

CA

NA

L S

TRE

ET,

SE

POTENTIAL BRIDGING

Legend

The following illustration represents Forest City Washington’s 1st Stage and 2nd Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Related Map Amendment, which was submitted to the Office of Zoning in March, 2013. Maximizing redevelopment potential along the Anacostia waterfront will depend on the appropriate relocation of D.C. Water’s operations and facilities, at no cost to DC Water ratepayers, as well as market conditions.

IIIIII

www.samaha-arch.com

s e r v i c e • d e s i g n • s u c c e s s

The District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority www.dcwater.com

Date: April 22, 2020

Serial

Number

Consultants /

Sub-Consultants

RFI

Confirmation of

interest in the

Program Manager

scope

RFP

Confirmation

to Participate

as a

PRIME

RFP

Confirmation

to Participate

as a

SUB

Confirmation Date Focal Point for this Solicitation

1Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson,

Inc.X X

February 12, 2020

March 25th 2020

March 13th 2020

Gail Prunier, email: [email protected], telephone: 410-316-

2380, and Denise Little, email: [email protected], telephone: 443-

662-4367

2McKissack McKissack

of Washington IncX X April 3rd 2020

Alina Alekseyev

Phone# 202.347.1446 - D 202.220.0114

[email protected]

3 Wave Civil X April 4th 2020

Sri Appana

Phone# 571-730-7569

[email protected]

4 Aecom X X April 3rd 2020

Tammy Koukoulis

Phone# +1-863-258-9971

[email protected]

5 Bryant X April 3rd 2020

Gary Moore

Phone# 301.276.4014 / 302.841.2354

[email protected]

6 Hayat Kelil-Brown X April 3rd 2020

Hayat KELIL-BROWN

Phone# (C) 202-494-1699 (O) | 202-856-7863

[email protected]

7 EXP X X

April 7th 2020

April 15th 2020

Alp Keceli

Phone# +1.202.572.2629 m +1.240.486.1119

[email protected]

Amir Ahmadzadeh - Phone# 202.567.5607

[email protected]

8 Sheladia Assosciates X X April 7th 2020

Mugdha Pimprikar Tipnis

Phone# (T) - (301) 590-3939

(D) - (301) 670-5365 - (C) - (404) 422-4442

[email protected]

9 WSP X X April 8th 2020

Anwer Hasan

Phone# Cell - 443-324-1287

Direct- 667-401-5290

[email protected]

10 TCT Cost Consultants, LLC X X April 8th 2020

Nina Manguiri

Phone# office 202-315-8944 ext. 305

direct 202.470.5034 m 202.431.7907

[email protected]

11 Gannett Fleming X April 8th 2020

Don Miller

Phone# 717-461-0779

[email protected]

12 ATCS Capital Infrastructure X X April 7th 2020

Pedro Capestany

Phone# 202-853-9500 | F: 202-506-6124 |

C: 703-626-5470 / 202-309-6195

[email protected]

13 CUBE ROOT CORPORATION X April 9th 2020

Kathryn Petrie

Phone# M: 412-585-0044

[email protected]

14 BVF Engineering, Inc. X April 9th 2020

Mo Faraj

Phone# (443) 917-2044 -F (443) 917-2096

[email protected]

15 Belstar, Inc. X April 9th 2020

Carolyn Jarrells

Phone# Office: (703) 645-0280

Direct: (804) 335-0080 - Mobile: (804) 437-0536

[email protected]

16 EBA X X April 9th 2020

Megan Disney

Phone# 443.739.6291

[email protected]

17Dulles Geotechnical and

Material Testing Services, Inc. X April 10th 2020

Tariq B. Hamid

Phone# Office: 703.488.9953

Cell: 703.999.3207

[email protected]

18

Global Engineering Solutions

(GES)

of Washington DC

X April 9th 2020

Suren Gosine

Phone #202.550.4091

[email protected]

19 SZ PM Consultants, Inc. X X April 10th 2020

Suli Wang

Phone# 703-678-8622

[email protected]

20 Bakka Group, LLC X X April 10th 2020

Essam Elmesiry

Phone# Cell : 571-234-2102 - 703-334-7142

[email protected]

21 McMillen Jacobs Associates X April 10th 2020

Alper Ucak

Phone# 703.999.4247

[email protected]

22 Delon Hampton A. (DHA) X X April 15th 2020

Jacquelyn R. Glover

Phone# D: 202.461.2161 | C: 202.688.9700

[email protected]

23 Interagency Inc. X X April 15th 2020

John Li

Phone# 240-988-9369

[email protected]

24 Savin Engineers, P.C. X April 15th 2020

Susan Charbonneau

Phone# 914.769.3200 x3242

[email protected]

25 CUBE ROOT CORPORATION X April 14th 2020

Kathryn Petrie

Phone# M 412-585-0044

[email protected]

26 ARCHVIA X April 14th 2020

Daniel S. Cutrona

Phone# M 703-599-5160

[email protected]

27 Sigma Associates, Inc. X X April 14th 2020

Cody Oswalt

Phone# 916-813-8011

[email protected]

28 Schnabel Engineering DC X April 14th 2020

Mary Anderson

Phone# O 202.677.4120 / D 202.677.4123 / C 240.882.4711

[email protected]

29 ZTigerS Consult X April 14th 2020

Mezmur Beyene

Phone# +1 301 500 0854 - C +1 240 338 7978

[email protected]

30 JDOS International X April 14th 2020

Janice Vieira

Phone# O: 202-726-8650 - C: 202-352-8650

[email protected]

31 CDM Smith X X April 14th 2020

Sogol B. Gremi

Phone# T: 703-691-6466 - C: 617-733-8073

[email protected]

32 Kim Engineering X April 14th 2020

Chris Ley

Phone# Office: (240) 542-4238 Cell: (703) 798-7276

[email protected]

33 Michael Baker International X April 14th 2020

Jenny Bowers

Phone# O 571-357-6024 | Direct 703-397-4878

[email protected]

34GeoConcepts Engineering, Inc.,

Terracon Consultants, Inc.X April 14th 2020

Yeates, Allison K

Phone# 703-726-8030

[email protected]>

35 Samaha Associates X X April 16th 2020

Randy A. Morrison

Phone# 703.691.3311

[email protected]

36DMY ENGINEERING

CONSULTANTS INCX April 20th 2020

Wamiq Hamid

Phone# tel: (703) 665-0586; cell: (703) 999-2337

[email protected]

RESPONDED TO RFI

1 Alpha Corporation X

2 Gordon X

3 Hill International Inc X

4 KCI Technologies, Inc. X

5 Mott MacDonald X

6 Nova Consulting X

7 Petoskeygroup DC X

8 PL-associate X

9 Prime Engineering X

10 The ElocenGroup LLC X

11Whitman Requardt and

Associates X

12 Shrewsberry & Associates, LLC X

TOTAL 27 8 29

DC WATER PROJECT - DCFA 504-WSA

NON-PROCESS FACILITIES PROGRAM MANAGER -A-E SERVICES

SUMMARY FROM RESPONSES - CONFIRMATION OF INTEREST





















mailto:[email protected]# 703.691.3311

