contract documents may be obtained from the mitn website ...87310170-b96f-4822... · the bidder...
TRANSCRIPT
Invitation to Bid
City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan
Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359
Riverbank (garage only)
The City of Lincoln Park is accepting bids for the
Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359
Riverbank (garage only) located in the
City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan
The City of Lincoln Park is accepting bids for the Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933
Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359 Riverbank (garage only) in the City of Lincoln Park. The location
of the structures may be found within the bidding documents. Bids shall be submitted on the
forms provided by the City of Lincoln Park. Bids shall be submitted in a sealed envelope and
have written on the face of the envelope the bidders name and the name of the project
“Demolitions”.
Bids must be received by 10:00 a.m. Wednesday November 29, 2017
Donna Breeding, City Clerk, City of Lincoln Park
1355 Southfield Road
Lincoln Park, Michigan 48146
Bids shall be publicly opened and read at:
10:00 a.m., (local time), Wednesday November 29, 2017
City of Lincoln Park
Municipal Office Building
1355 Southfield Road
Lincoln Park, Michigan 48146
Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website at www.mitn.info
Any questions pertaining the Contract Documents should be forwarded to DPS Director,
John Kozuh at (313) 215-4109.
The City of Lincoln Park reserves the right to waive any irregularity, accept or reject any or all
bids, and to accept proposals that, in the City’s opinion, are in the best interest of and to the
advantage of the City of Lincoln Park. No bidder may withdraw his bid within 90 days after the
date of bid opening.
Page 1 of 16
Invitation To Bid
City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan
Demolition of Structures
762 Ford Blvd.
1933 Moran
1520 Pagel
1359 Riverbank (Garage Only)
Page 2 of 16
Table of Contents:
I. Instructions to Bidders
II. General Requirements
III. Demolition Specifications
IV. Bid Form
V. Section 3 Business Concern Statement
VI. Asbestos Report
Page 3 of 16
I. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
The City of Lincoln Park reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to award the Contract to
other than the low bidder, and to waive irregularities and/or formalities. Proposals shall be based
only upon the requirements described in the Demolition Specifications and Exhibit “A” to the
demolition specifications. Suggested alternate proposals for work other than that specified may
be given consideration.
TIME FOR COMPLETION: The bidder will be required to agree, if awarded a Contract, to
complete the Work on or before the Contract completion date as stated in the Contract and no
later than 30 days from award.
All work must be completed within 30 days of the notice to proceed communication from the
City of Lincoln Park. Failure to complete the work within 30 days will result in a two hundred
dollar ($200.00) per calendar day penalty, with said penalty to be deducted from the bid price.
In the event the work is not completed to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln Park, the City
may hire a replacement contractor to complete the work. Any additional cost incurred by the City
shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Fees paid to any replacement contractor will be
deducted from amounts owned to contractor.
CONTRACTORS WITH SUBCONTRACTORS: All Contracts made by the successful
bidder with subcontractors shall be covered by the terms and conditions of the Contract. The
successful bidder shall see to it that his subcontractors are fully informed in regard to these terms
and conditions.
EXPLANATION TO BIDDERS BY ADDENDUM: Neither the City of Lincoln Park nor its
Representative will give verbal answers to inquiries regarding the specifications, or give verbal
instructions previous to award of the contract. Any verbal statements regarding same by any
person, previous to award, shall be unauthorized.
Explanations desired by bidders shall be requested of the City of Lincoln Park in writing, and if
explanations are necessary, a reply will be made in the form of an addendum, a copy of which
will be forwarded to each bidder whose work is affected. No inquiry received within five (5)
days of the date fixed as the bid date will be given consideration.
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: Addenda issued to bidders prior to date of receipt of
proposals shall become part of the Contract Documents, and proposals shall include the work
described.
INSPECTION OF THE SITE: Before submitting a proposal, each bidder shall personally
inspect the site of the proposed work to arrive at a clear understanding of the conditions under
which the Work is to be done.
The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have
satisfied himself as to the conditions of the premises, the Project Site, existing obstructions, and
any other conditions affecting the Work before deliver of his proposal.
Page 4 of 16
No allowance or extra consideration on behalf of the Contractor will subsequently be allowed by
reason or error or oversight on the part on the Contractor, or on account of interference by the
Owner, or by other contractors’ activities.
Submission of proposal implies that the bidder is conversant with all site and building conditions
under which the Work will be conducted.
TAXES: All proposals in original contract work, and for all other work thereunder, shall include
all applicable taxes, including social security, unemployment and sales or use taxes, and any other
taxes specifically levied on the work or on wages by local, city, state or federal government,
except real property taxes on the site. Proposals shall also include cost of permits and other like
payments, charges, and costs incidental to work covered by the Contract Documents.
CONTRACT: The contract shall be deemed as having been awarded when formal notice shall
have been duly served upon the intended awardee by an officer of the City of Lincoln Park duly
authorized to give such notice.
Page 5 of 16
II. General Requirements
1. USE OF PREMISES: The contractor expressly undertakes at his own expense:
A. To take every precautions against injuries to persons or damage to property,
compliance to MIOSHA rules.
B. To comply with the regulations governing the use of premises which are
occupied and to perform his Contract in such a manner as not to interrupt or
interfere with the operations of the City of Lincoln Park.
C. To store his apparatus, materials, supplies and equipment in such orderly fashion
at the site of Work as will not unduly interfere with the progress of his work or
the Work of any subcontractors.
D. To place upon the Work or any part thereof only such loads as are consistent with
the safety of that portion of the Work.
2. CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT:
A. The Contractors shall provide the services of a competent superintendent from
the beginning of the Work to the date of final completion of the Contract.
B. The Superintendent shall be at all times in charge of the work and shall be
provided with such assistance as is necessary to properly carry on the individual
items of the work.
C. The Contractors shall also provide a staff adequate to coordinate and expedite the
work properly and shall at all times maintain competent supervision of its own
work and that of its subcontractors to insure compliance with Contract
requirements.
D. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all constructions means, methods,
techniques, sequences and procedures and for coordinating all portions of the
work under the Contract.
E. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and
supervising all safety precautions and programs connected with the work.
3. CLEANING
A. The Contractor shall at all times keep the premises and the adjoining premises,
driveways and streets clean of rubbish caused by the Contractors operations and
at the completion of the work shall remove all the rubbish, all of his tools,
equipment, temporary work and surplus materials, from and about the premises,
and shall leave the work site clean and ready for use. If the Contractor does not
attend to such cleaning immediately upon request, the City of Lincoln Park may
cause such cleaning to be done by others and charge the cost of same to the
Page 6 of 16
Contractor.
B. The Contractor will be responsible for all damage from fire which originates in,
or is propagated by, accumulations of rubbish or debris.
C. All rubbish and debris shall be disposed of off the project site in an approved
sanitary landfill site. No open burning of debris or rubbish will be permitted.
The job site shall be left neat and clean at the completion of each day's
operations. Proof of disposal tickets to be provided to the City.
D. Final Clean-up. In addition to all of the above requirements, upon completion of
the Work or of an individual sections thereof, the Contractor, immediately prior
to turning over the work or completed portion thereof to the Owner, shall arrange
for the proper and complete cleaning by washing all soiled concrete walks and
driveways.
4. TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE:
A. All charges for electrical power energy used for temporary lighting and power
required for this work will be paid by the Contractor.
B. The Contractor shall provide and maintain any temporary electrical service
required for this work. At the completion of the work, all such temporary
electrical facilities shall be removed and disposed of by the Contractor.
C. Temporary service shall comply with the regulations and requirements of the
National Electrical Code and any other local rules and regulations governing
temporary electrical installation.
5. CONTRACTORS MEASUREMENTS: Before ordering material, preparing shop
drawings, or doing any work, each Contractor shall verify, at the building, all dimensions
which may affect his work. He assumes full responsibility for the accuracy of his figures.
No allowance for additional compensation will be considered for discrepancies between
dimensions on the Drawings and actual field dimensions.
6. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY: It is not the responsibility of the City of
Lincoln Park or its representative to notify the Contractor or subcontractor(s) when to
commence, to cease, or to resume work; not in any way to superintend so as to relieve the
Contractor of responsibility or of any consequences of neglect or carelessness by him or
his subordinates. All material and labor shall be furnished at time best suited for all
Contractors and subcontractors concerned, so that the combined work of all shall be
properly and fully completed on the date fixed by the contract.
7. PROGRESS MEETINGS: When directed by the City of Lincoln Park or its
representative, meetings shall be held for the purpose of coordinating and expediting the
work. The invited contractors or subcontractors will be required to have qualified
representatives at these meetings, empowered to act in their behalf.
8. WORK SCHEDULE: Before the signing of the contract, a definite time schedule shall
be agreed upon in general by all parties concerned, and within a reasonable time after the
Contractor has been notified by the City of Lincoln Park of being awarded the contract,
Page 7 of 16
he shall submit to the owner a schedule of operations giving dates each part of branch of
Work will be started and completed. The schedule shall be made in such form as will
meet the approval of the City of Lincoln Park.
9. FIRE PREVENTION:
A. Take all precautions to eliminate possible fire hazards at the site, including but
not limited to enforcing the following requirements:
• All combustible debris shall be removed from the building and storage areas
on a daily basis, including empty paint container, oily rags, etc.
• No bitumen heating kettles allowed in the building, or within 50 feet of the
building exterior walls, except upon special arrangement with the City of
Lincoln Park's representative and with written authorization from him
designating the exact locations.
• All tarpaulin or other covers for stored materials, opening in walls, etc. shall
be flameproof.
• No Open fires on the sites.
• Avoid storage of large quantities of flammable materials at the site, as far as
possible.
• Gasoline may not be stored in any building at any stage of construction.
10. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS:
A. Code Listing: Any reference to standards of any society, institute, associations or
governmental agency which is part of the building code in effect for this project
shall comply with the edition date published in the reference edition of the
building code.
B. Non-code Listings: Any reference to standards of any society, institute,
association, or governmental agency which is not part of the building code for
this project shall be the edition in effect at the time of opening of bids, except as
otherwise specifically stated in the this project manual.
C. Project Manual Listing: Edition dates listed with reference standard in each
Section of this Project Manual are included for reference only.
11. INSPECTION AND TESTS:
A. All submittal required by the specification shall be submitted in the number listed
under an individual specification section.
Page 8 of 16
B. Each submittal shall be covered by transmittal letter in duplicate, properly
identified with the project title and number and a brief description of the item
being submitted.
12. SUBMITTAL:
A. All submittal required by the specifications shall be submitted in the number
listed under an individual specification section.
B. Each submittal shall be covered by a transmittal letter in duplicate, properly
identified with the project title and number and a brief description of the item
being submitted.
13. ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND PROCEDURES:
A. Promptly report in writing to the City of Lincoln Park's representative or its
appointee accidents which cause death, personnel injury or property damages,
arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work whether on or
adjacent to the site. Where death or serious injuries or serious damages are
caused, the accident shall be reported immediately by telephone or messenger to
the City of Lincoln Park's representative or its appointee.
B. If any claim is made by anyone against the contractor or any subcontractor on
account of any accident, promptly report the facts in writing to the City of
Lincoln Park's representative or its appointee giving full detail of the claim.
14. PROJECT SAFETY:
A. CONTRACTOR assumes full responsibility for complying with and enforcing all
rules and regulations of all Federal, State and Municipal authorities having
jurisdiction, as outline in the General Conditions, including those of any
Occupational Safety and Health Act.
B. The requirements outlined hereinafter are to be considered as minimal, and where
the requirements of any of the above authorities having jurisdiction conflict with
the requirements of this section, the maximum condition shall prevail.
C. Any items damaged due to failure to comply with these requirements shall be
corrected or replaced, to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln Park’s
Representative without cost to the City of Lincoln Park.
D. CONTRACTOR assumes full responsibility for enforcing compliance with any
protective measures indicated in specific sections of the work.
E. CONTRACTOR to provide all barricades, night lanterns, guard rails and other
safety measures at excavations and other points of danger in accordance with the
requirements of Federal, State and Municipal regulations.
15. BID BOND: A Bid Bond or Certified Check in the amount of five percent (5%) of the
bidder’s proposal will be required by the City of Lincoln Park.
Page 9 of 16
16. PERFORMANCE BOND: The following bonds shall be deliver to the City of Lincoln
Park and shall become binding upon the parties upon execution of the contract and
acceptance of the bid.
A. A performance bond satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, exercised by a
surety company authorized to do business in this state or otherwise secured in a
manner satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, in an amount equal to 100% of
the price specified.
B. A payment bond, satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, executed by a surety
company authorized to do business in this state or otherwise secured in a manner
satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, for the protection of all persons
supplying labor and materials to the contractor or its subcontractors for the
performance of the work provided for in the contract. The bond shall equal
100% of the price specified in the contract.
17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: The Contractor will be required to meet our
standard insurance requirements. Unless otherwise specified the Contractor shall, before
commencing work hereunder, procure and thereafter maintain polices of insurance
satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park with the City of Lincoln Park an additionally
named insured in the following minimum amounts with specific coverage which
includes underground, explosion, and collapse.
Property Damage $1,000,000 (each accident)
Bodily injury $ 500,000 (each person)
$1,000,000 (each accident)
Workmen's Compensation Insurance: All Liability imposed Workmen's
Compensations stature
Employer's Liability Insurance $ 100,000
Contractual Liability Insurance $ 500,000
Completed Operations Insurance $ 500,000
Owned, Hired and Non-Ownership
Vehicle Bodily Injury and Property
Damaged to the Following Limits
Bodily injury, including accidental death $500,000 (ea/person);
$1,000,000 (ea/accident)
Property damage $1,000,000 (ea/accident)
SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION
The bidder shall list below information concerning any subcontractor who will be performing
work at the Project site:
SUBCONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK AMOUNT
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL $________________________
Page 10 of 16
TIME OF COMPLETION:
The work under this Contract shall be completed within thirty (30) calendar days from the Notice
to Proceed.
SCHEDULE OF VALUES:
The undersigned will submit for approval, within twenty-four (24) hours, if requested by the City
of Lincoln Park, a schedule of values, including a list of proposed subcontractors, the amounts of
their subcontracts and the fee each subcontractor intends to apply to contract changes. The
undersigned agrees in every way to be responsible for the Work, material, equipment and supplies
furnished by each subcontractor. The fee stated in the Schedule of Values by the undersigned and
those state for each subcontractor listed above by the undersigned shall include all costs for
administration onsite supervision, taxes, permit fees, overhead and profit.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS:
The undersigned agrees to execute a contract providing that we are notified of the acceptance
within five (5) calendar days after formal notice of award.
The undersigned has carefully examined the bidding and Contract Documents, including the
Instructions to bidder, General Conditions of the Contract, Supplemental Conditions,
Specifications, and any Addend issued, and agrees to be bound by all requirements thereof in the
submission of this proposal, and in the performance of the contract if awarded to him based on
this proposal.
The undersigned bidder does hereby declare that the bidder has the legal state checked below:
_____ Individual
_____ Co-Partnership
_____ Corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of
_____ Joint business under an assumed name.
Page 11 of 16
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
The names and addresses of all persons indicated as partners in this proposal are as follows:
NAME ADDRESS
___________________________ ______________________________________
___________________________ ______________________________________
___________________________ ______________________________________
Federal I.D.__________________ DUNS # _______________________________
This proposal is submitted in the name of:
Name of Contractor
Signature
Title
Signed and seal this_______day of_________________________, 2017.
Page 12 of 16
III. DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS
1. DRAWINGS: No drawings have been prepared to accompany these specifications.
Bidders are to provide quotes to demolish all structures listed in the City of Lincoln Park.
2. SITE VISIT: Each Contractor Bidding on this project shall visit the site(s) of the work
and personally observe the conditions under which the work will be performed. Anyone
wanting an interior inspection prior to the bid date may contact DPS Supervisor
Ron Rail at (313) 215-6096.
3. WORK INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT/ Barricades: The Contractor shall
provide sufficient barricades and fencing to secure the site and prevent trespassing in the
demolition area. Signs shall be posted to alert people of the hazardous conditions.
Razing of Structures/ The Contractor shall demolish all structures at the address
indicated in the proposal form, water shall be used to eliminate residual dust (weather
permitting).
If basement exits, the floor shall be broken into small sections and removed completely.
The contractor may use a "headache" ball or mechanical methods to
achieve this end. The Contractor will be responsible for any damage to adjacent
structures caused by vibrations or transmission of shock waves due to his operations.
Prior to backfilling, all existing public utilities and sanitary sewer leads to the main
building and/or garages shall be disconnected and plugged. This work will require
inspections by the City of Lincoln Park's Building Department and/or Water Department.
Removal of Scrap/ All items shall be removed from the existing premises:
All grass shall be cut to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln Park and trees shall be cut
and stumps grounded out at least six (6) inches below grade level.
The cost of the demolition and removal of scrap shall incorporate the scrap value of "all"
items to be removed from the premises.
Backfilling: Backfilling of the basement (if applicable) shall be done with clean fill
material. No wood, paper, or other deleterious material or construction debris shall be
used in the backfilling. Certification of clean fill must be provided.
Backfilling shall be placed in layers and backfilled to the same density as the adjacent
soil. Mechanical tampers, or rollers shall be used for this purpose.
Rough Grading:
After the site is backfilled, the Contractor shall rough grade the site for positive drainage
without draining onto adjacent side lots.
Page 13 of 16
Clean-Up:
All materials from the demolished building shall be loaded up and removed from the site
by the Contractor as a part of this project. All such materials shall become the property
of the Contractor.
4. RESTORATION OF PAVEMENTS AND SIDEWALKS:
Sidewalks are in good condition unless otherwise noted, drop curbs at driveway
approach location shall be removed and replaced with full height curb to match
existing adjacent curb, any damage caused to street pavements, curbs, sidewalks, etc.,
by the Contractor's equipment shall be repaired or replaced to the satisfaction of the City
of Lincoln Park and/or the satisfaction of the Building Department of the City of Lincoln
Park.
5. RESTORATION OF LOTS;
After completion of all clean-up and rough grading, the Contractor shall fine grade the
disturbed areas for positive drainage and provide a minimum of three inches (3") of
topsoil, seed and mulch.
Page 14 of 16
14
IV. Bid Form Return sealed bid marked “Demolition” by Wednesday November 29, 2017
at 10:00 a.m. (local time) To: Donna Breeding, City Clerk
1355 Southfield Road
Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Contractor_______________________________________________ Date_____________
Address__________________________________________________
City______________________ State_________ Zip ______________
Telephone _____________________ Fax # _____________________
Email: ________________________ DUNS #____________________
Signature: _________________________________
Printed Name & Title _______________________________________________
Proposal: The undersigned, being cognizant of all conditions governing the work and of the
requirements of the authorities having jurisdiction, and having read the Specifications for the
Work, and visited the Project site(s), purposes to furnish all labor, and equipment for demolition
of the structures listed below on the bid form located in the City of Lincoln Park, with the
respective itemized bid amounts(s):
1. Demolition and removal of all structures, foundations, footings,
service walks, driveway, driveway approach and replace curb in approach.
2. Remove floor and footings of all structures.
3. Remove any miscellaneous posts, poles or debris.
4. Remove any and all trees, bushes, and stumps located within a five (5) foot
perimeter of the structure to be demolished.
5. Contractor responsible for all environmental notification and procedures.
6. Back fill hole with clean fill. Certification of clean fill must be provided.
7. Level yard to grade, topsoil and seed area.
8. Contractor responsible for pulling all permits with the Building Department (permit
fees are $200 per location) and contacting the City of Lincoln Park’s Water
Department prior to demolition.
Location Bid Amount
762 Ford _________________
1933 Moran _________________
1520 Pagel _________________
_________________
1359 Riverbank (Garage Only) _________________
Page 15 of 16
15
762 Ford- Removal of asbestos
Containing Material and/or mold _________________
_________________
1933 Moran- Removal of asbestos
Containing Material and/or mold _________________
1520 Pagel- Removal of asbestos
Containing material and/or mold _________________
1359 Riverbank (garage only)- Removal
Of asbestos containing material and/or mold _________________
Total Bid Amount _________________
Addenda The following addenda covering changes in the work have been received during the
bidding period. The work described in said has been included in this proposal.
Addendum No _____________________________________ Date _______________
Addendum No _____________________________________ Date ________________
Page 16 of 16
16
V. LINCOLN PARK SECTION 3 BUSINESS CONCERN STATEMENT
Business Name _______________________________________________________
Business Address______________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
Contact Person ___________________________ Title ________________________
Telephone #: (___) ____________________ Cell # (___) ______________________
The Bidder certifies that it is a Section 3 Business Concern based on:
Status as a Section 3 resident-owned enterprise (at least 51% owned by Section 3 residents:
• Provide copy of resident lease, evidence of participation in public assistance program or signed Certification for Section 3 Resident.
• Provide documentation of business ownership, such as copy of articles of incorporation, partnership agreement, list of owners/stockholders and percentage ownership of each, organization chart with names and titles.
At least 30% of their permanent, full-time employees are currently Section 3 Residents or were Section 3 Residents within the past 3 years.
• Provide complete list of all permanent, full-time employees
• Provide list of employees claiming Section 3 status
• Provide documentation of Section 3 status for all applicable employees such as PHA residential lease or signed certification of Section 3 Resident.
Commitment to subcontract 25% of the dollar award to qualified Section 3 Business Concerns. (Only applicable for Prime Contractors)
• Provide list of subcontracted Section 3 business(es) and subcontract amount.
• Provide documentation of Section 3 status for applicable businesses
The Bidder in not a Section 3 Business Concern. I hereby certify that the information provided by me to be true and correct, and understand falsification of any information could subject me to disqualification from participation and punishment under the law. ____________________________________ _________________ Owner Signature Date ____________________________________ Print Name This form must be completed and returned with bid, for bid to be considered.
NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:
1359 Riverbank Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Prepared for:
City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd
Lincoln Park, MI-48146 313-386-1817
Prepared By:
ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600
10/1/17
ETC Job #: 198706
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) Introduction
2) Information about Asbestos Inspections
a) Sampling Procedures
b) PLM Analysis Methodology
c) Interpretation of Inspection Results
3) Regulatory Requirements
a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements
b) NESHAPs Requirements
c) Notification Requirements
d) Abatement Requirements
4) Summary and Conclusions
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
5) Inspector’s Information/Certification
Appendices
Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results
Appendix B – Site Map
Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish
1. Introduction
City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/1/17.
The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.
ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.
Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.
Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.
2. Information about Asbestos Inspections
a. Sampling Procedures
Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:
• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)
It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the
analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.
Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).
b. PLM Analysis Methodology
PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).
Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.
According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.
c. Interpretation of Inspection Results
A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).
A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.
3. Regulatory Requirements
There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.
a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations
The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:
• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination
facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or
more).
Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.
In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.
b. NESHAP Requirements
Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:
• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor
covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)
In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:
• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable
• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.
• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.
• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.
It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.
c. Notification Requirements
When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.
If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.
If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.
For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.
In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.
d. Abatement Requirements
Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:
• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is
occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in
the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal
activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final
asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.
• Meet all other current regulations and standards.
In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:
• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)
• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report
By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.
4. Summary and Conclusions
ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.
As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.
ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not
included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.
On the following charts, please find:
• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.
Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.
5. Inspector’s Information
All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.
This report reviewed and submitted by:
Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
Material # Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location
(Refer to map in Appendix B)
1 Roof Shingle Black w/ White Specks
No 440 SF Exterior Garage
2 Roof Shingle Black with Red Specks
No 440 SF Exterior Garage
3 Foundation Cement No 360 SF Interior Garage
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS
Page 1 of 4
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174
(734) 955-6600
Fax: (734) 955-6604
To :
Attention :
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, MI 48174
Project Location :
John Kozuh
Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY
1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
REVISED REPORT
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198706 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614236 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/11/2017
614237 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/11/2017
614238 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/11/2017
614239 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/11/2017
614240 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/11/2017
614241 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/11/2017
614242 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/11/2017
614243 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/11/2017
614244 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/11/2017
Reviewed by:
Quality Assurance Coordinator
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 2 of 4
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY
1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198706
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614236
01A90% Other10% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle (White Specks)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614236
01A88% Other12% CelluloseBlack/White/GreyBacking
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614237
01B97% Other3% CelluloseBlack/WhiteRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614237
01B95% Other5% CelluloseBlackBacking
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614238
01C98% Other2% CelluloseBlack/WhiteRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614238
01C97% Other3% CelluloseBlackBacking
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 3 of 4
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY
1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198706
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614239
02A98% Other2% CelluloseBlack/RedRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614239
02A98% Other2% CelluloseBlackBacking
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614240
02B97% Other3% CelluloseBlack/RedRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614240
02B98% Other2% CelluloseBlackBacking
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614241
02C95% Other5% CelluloseBlack/RedRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614241
02C98% Other2% CelluloseBlackBacking
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614242
03A95% Other5% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousInt Garage
Analyst: Liliane Mason
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 4 of 4
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY
1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198706
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614243
03B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousInt Garage
Analyst: Liliane Mason
None Detected614244
03C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousInt Garage
Analyst: Liliane Mason
Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory
Analyst: Liliane Mason
400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")
Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples
EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com
APPENDIX B
SITE MAP
1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198706
Garage 1
N
01A 01B
01C
02A
02B
02C
03A
03B
03C
Garage
APPENDIX C
STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF
INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH
NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:
1520 Pagel Ave Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Prepared for:
City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd
Lincoln Park, MI-48146 313-386-1817
Prepared By:
ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600
10/1/17
ETC Job #: 198705
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) Introduction
2) Information about Asbestos Inspections
a) Sampling Procedures
b) PLM Analysis Methodology
c) Interpretation of Inspection Results
3) Regulatory Requirements
a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements
b) NESHAPs Requirements
c) Notification Requirements
d) Abatement Requirements
4) Summary and Conclusions
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
5) Inspector’s Information/Certification
Appendices
Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results
Appendix B – Site Map
Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish
1. Introduction
City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/1/17.
The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.
ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.
Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.
Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.
2. Information about Asbestos Inspections
a. Sampling Procedures
Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:
• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)
It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the
analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.
Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).
b. PLM Analysis Methodology
PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).
Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.
According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.
c. Interpretation of Inspection Results
A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).
A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.
3. Regulatory Requirements
There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.
a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations
The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:
• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination
facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or
more).
Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.
In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.
b. NESHAP Requirements
Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:
• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor
covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)
In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:
• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable
• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.
• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.
• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.
It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.
c. Notification Requirements
When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.
If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.
If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.
For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.
In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.
d. Abatement Requirements
Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:
• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is
occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in
the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal
activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final
asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.
• Meet all other current regulations and standards.
In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:
• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)
• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report
By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.
4. Summary and Conclusions
ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.
As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.
ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not
included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.
On the following charts, please find:
• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.
Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
Material #
Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location
(Refer to map in Appendix B)
1 Drywall White No 2,025 SF Throughout
2 Wall Panel Tan No 780 SF FS 1,2,5
3 Linoleum White w/ Paper Back Yes 95 SF FS 4
4 12x12 P/S Tan No 145 SF FS 3,4
5 12x12 Floor Tile No 21 SF FS 4,5
6 Mastic Brown No 21 SF FS 4,5
7 Carpet Underlayment Black No 125 SF FS 1
8 Hardwood Underlayment Black No 680 SF FS 1-5
9 Window Glaze White Yes 1 Unit FS 1
10 Caulk White No 15 LF Exterior House
11 Ceiling Tile Tan No 285 SF FS 3-5
12 Ceiling Panel Tan No 320 SF FS 1,2
13 Paper Insulation White Metallic No 115 SF FS 6
14 Blown in Insulation Tan No 680 SF Throughout House Ceiling
15 Asphalt Siding Green & White No 1,250 SF Exterior House
16 Fiber Board Tan & Black No 1,250 SF Exterior House
17 Roof Shingle Red & Tan No 820 SF Exterior House
18 Roof Shingle Dark Brown & Black
No 820 SF Exterior House
5. Inspector’s Information
All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.
This report reviewed and submitted by:
Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS
Page 1 of 12
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174
(734) 955-6600
Fax: (734) 955-6604
To :
Attention :
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, MI 48174
Project Location :
John Kozuh
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198705 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614181 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/11/2017
614182 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/11/2017
614183 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/11/2017
614184 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/11/2017
614185 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/11/2017
614186 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/11/2017
614187 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/11/2017
614188 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/11/2017
614189 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/11/2017
614190 Asbestos Analysis04A 10/11/2017
614191 Asbestos Analysis04B 10/11/2017
614192 Asbestos Analysis04C 10/11/2017
614193 Asbestos Analysis05A 10/11/2017
614194 Asbestos Analysis05B 10/11/2017
614195 Asbestos Analysis05C 10/11/2017
614196 Asbestos Analysis06A 10/11/2017
614197 Asbestos Analysis06B 10/11/2017
614198 Asbestos Analysis06C 10/11/2017
614199 Asbestos Analysis07A 10/11/2017
614200 Asbestos Analysis07B 10/11/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 2 of 12
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198705 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614201 Asbestos Analysis07C 10/11/2017
614202 Asbestos Analysis08A 10/11/2017
614203 Asbestos Analysis08B 10/11/2017
614204 Asbestos Analysis08C 10/11/2017
614205 Asbestos Analysis09A 10/11/2017
614206 Asbestos Analysis09B 10/11/2017
614207 Asbestos Analysis09C 10/11/2017
614208 Asbestos Analysis10A 10/11/2017
614209 Asbestos Analysis10B 10/11/2017
614210 Asbestos Analysis10C 10/11/2017
614211 Asbestos Analysis11A 10/11/2017
614212 Asbestos Analysis11B 10/11/2017
614213 Asbestos Analysis11C 10/11/2017
614214 Asbestos Analysis12A 10/11/2017
614215 Asbestos Analysis12B 10/11/2017
614216 Asbestos Analysis12C 10/11/2017
614217 Asbestos Analysis13A 10/11/2017
614218 Asbestos Analysis13B 10/11/2017
614219 Asbestos Analysis13C 10/11/2017
614220 Asbestos Analysis14A 10/11/2017
614221 Asbestos Analysis14B 10/11/2017
614222 Asbestos Analysis14C 10/11/2017
614223 Asbestos Analysis15A 10/11/2017
614224 Asbestos Analysis15B 10/11/2017
614225 Asbestos Analysis15C 10/11/2017
614226 Asbestos Analysis16A 10/11/2017
614227 Asbestos Analysis16B 10/11/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 3 of 12
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198705 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614228 Asbestos Analysis16C 10/11/2017
614229 Asbestos Analysis17A 10/11/2017
614230 Asbestos Analysis17B 10/11/2017
614231 Asbestos Analysis17C 10/11/2017
614232 Asbestos Analysis18A 10/11/2017
614233 Asbestos Analysis18B 10/11/2017
614234 Asbestos Analysis18C 10/11/2017
Reviewed by:
Quality Assurance Coordinator
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 4 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614181
01A95% Other5% CelluloseWhiteDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614182
01B99% Other1% CelluloseWhiteDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614183
01C99% Other1% CelluloseWhiteDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614184
02A1% Other99% CelluloseTanWall Panel
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614185
02B1% Other99% CelluloseTanWall Panel
Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614186
02C2% Other98% CelluloseTanWall Panel
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 5 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
40% Chrysotile614187
03A50% Other10% CelluloseTan/BlackLinoleum
Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Layer-1 Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614187
03A100% Other GreyMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Layer-2 Analyst: Sarah Poirier
614188
03B Not Analyzed
FS4
Layer-1 Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614188
03B99% Other1% CelluloseGreyMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Layer-2 Analyst: Sarah Poirier
614189
03C Not Analyzed
FS4
Layer-1 Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614189
03C100% Other GreyMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Layer-2 Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614190
04A99% Other1% CelluloseTan12x12 Peel and Stick
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614191
04B99% Other1% CelluloseTan12x12 Peel and Stick
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 6 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614192
04C100% Other Tan12x12 Peel and Stick
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614193
05A95% Other5% CelluloseTan12x12 Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4 Undersink
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614194
05B97% Other3% CelluloseTan12x12 Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614195
05C97% Other3% CelluloseTan12x12 Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5 Closet
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614196
06A99% Other1% CelluloseBrownMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614197
06B100% Other BrownMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614198
06C100% Other BrownMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 7 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614199
07A40% Other60% CelluloseBlackCarpet Underlay
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614200
07B30% Other70% CelluloseBlackCarpet Underlay
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614201
07C30% Other70% CelluloseBlackCarpet Underlay
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614202
08A10% Other90% CelluloseBlackHardwood Underlay
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614203
08B5% Other95% CelluloseBlackHardwood Underlay
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614204
08C10% Other90% CelluloseBlackHardwood Underlay
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
3% Chrysotile614205
09A96% Other1% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 8 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
614206
09B Not Analyzed
FS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
614207
09C Not Analyzed
FS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614208
10A99% Other1% CelluloseWhiteCaulk
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614209
10B100% Other WhiteCaulk
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614210
10C100% Other WhiteCaulk
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614211
11A4% Other96% CelluloseTanCeiling Tile
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614212
11B3% Other97% CelluloseTanCeiling Tile
Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 9 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614213
11C3% Other97% CelluloseTanCeiling Tile
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614214
12A1% Other99% CelluloseTanCeiling Panel
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614215
12B1% Other99% CelluloseTanCeiling Panel
Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614216
12C2% Other98% CelluloseTanCeiling Panel
Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614217
13A50% Other50% CelluloseWhitePaper Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614218
13B55% Other45% CelluloseWhitePaper Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614219
13C50% Other50% CelluloseWhitePaper Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 10 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614220
14A10% Other90% CelluloseTanBlown-in Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614221
14B5% Other95% CelluloseTanBlown-in Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614222
14C5% Other95% CelluloseTanBlown-in Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614223
15A98% Other2% CelluloseGreen/WhiteAsphalt Siding
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614224
15B98% Other2% CelluloseGreen/WhiteAsphalt Siding
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614225
15C99% Other1% CelluloseGreen/WhiteAsphalt Siding
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614226
16A10% Other90% CelluloseTan/BlackFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 11 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614227
16B10% Other90% CelluloseTan/BlackFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614228
16C10% Other90% CelluloseTan/BlackFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614229
17A85% Other15% FiberglassRed/TanRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614230
17B90% Other10% FiberglassRed/TanRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614231
17C85% Other15% FiberglassRed/TanRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614232
18A70% Other30% CelluloseBrown/BlackRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
None Detected614233
18B60% Other40% CelluloseBrown/BlackRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 12 of 12
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198705
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614234
18C60% Other40% CelluloseBrown/BlackRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory
Analyst: Sarah Poirier
400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")
Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples
EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
APPENDIX B
SITE MAP
1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198705
1st floor
N
FS 1
FS 2
FS 3
FS 4
FS 5
FS 6
Exterior 7
01A
01B
01C
02A
02B
02C
03A 03B
03C
04A
04B
04C 05A
05B
05C
06A
06B
06C
07A
07B
07C
08A
08B
08C
09A
09B
09C
10A
10B
10C
11A
11B
11C
12A
12B
12C
13A
13B
13C
14A
14B
14C
15A
15C
16A
16B
16C
17A
17B
18A
18B
15B
17C
18C
APPENDIX C
STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF
INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH
NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:
1933 Moran Ave. Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Prepared for:
City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd.
Lincoln Park, MI 48146 313-386-1817
Prepared By:
ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600
10/1/2017
ETC Job #: 198704
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) Introduction
2) Information about Asbestos Inspections
a) Sampling Procedures
b) PLM Analysis Methodology
c) Interpretation of Inspection Results
3) Regulatory Requirements
a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements
b) NESHAPs Requirements
c) Notification Requirements
d) Abatement Requirements
4) Summary and Conclusions
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
5) Inspector’s Information/Certification
Appendices
Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results
Appendix B – Site Map
Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish
1. Introduction
City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/1/2017.
The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.
ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.
Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.
Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.
2. Information about Asbestos Inspections
a. Sampling Procedures
Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:
• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)
It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the
analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.
Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).
b. PLM Analysis Methodology
PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).
Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.
According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.
c. Interpretation of Inspection Results
A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).
A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.
3. Regulatory Requirements
There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.
a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations
The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:
• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination
facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or
more).
Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.
In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.
b. NESHAP Requirements
Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:
• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor
covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)
In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:
• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable
• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.
• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.
• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.
It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.
c. Notification Requirements
When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.
If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.
If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.
For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.
In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.
d. Abatement Requirements
Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:
• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is
occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in
the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal
activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final
asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.
• Meet all other current regulations and standards.
In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:
• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)
• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report
By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.
4. Summary and Conclusions
ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.
As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.
ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not
included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.
On the following charts, please find:
• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.
Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
Material # Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location
(Refer to map in Appendix B)
1 Pipe Wrap, white Yes 28 LF Rooms 10 & 12
2 Drywall with Mud & Tape, white No 2980 SF Throughout House
3 Floor Tile, 9X9, with paper backing, tan with glitter
No 145 SF Rooms 6 & 7
4 Floor Tile, 9X9, tan with glitter
Yes 680 SF Rooms 10 & 12
5 Mastic, black No 680 SF Rooms 10 & 12
6 Floor Tile, 12X12, brown flower pattern
No 185 SF Rooms 6, 7 & 9
7 Peel N’ Stick, 12X12, beige/tan No 50 SF Rooms 5 & 10
8 Peel N’ Stick, 12X12, wood grain
No 265 SF Rooms 2-4
9 Floor Underlay, black No 45 SF Room 5
10 House Wrap, black No 1900 SF Ext. House
11 Chimney Mortar, grey No 20 SF Rooms 8 & 11
12 Wire Insulation, black No 320 LF Throughout House
13 Foundation Cement, grey No 828 SF Basement
14 Stack Cement, white Yes 5 SF Room 12
15 Paper Stack Insulation, white Yes 5 LF Room 12
16 Window Glaze, white Yes 10 Units All Windows/ First Floor
17 Window Glaze, yellow No 5 Units All Windows-Basement
18 Ext. Caulk, white Yes 200 LF Ext. House
19 Attic Insulation, brown No 828 SF Attic
20 Transite Siding, white Yes 1900 SF Ext. House
21 Fiberboard , black/tan No 640 SF Ext. Garage
22 House Wrap, tan/silver No 1900 SF Ext. House
23 Vapor Barrier, tan No 828 SF Throughout 1st floor
24 Roof Shingles, grey No 1400 SF Ext. House/ Ext. Garage
25 Ice Shield, black No 1400 SF Ext. House/ Ext. Garage
26 Rood Shingle, black/grey No 900 SF Ext. House
5. Inspector’s Information
All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.
This report reviewed and submitted by:
Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS
Page 1 of 19
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174
(734) 955-6600
Fax: (734) 955-6604
To :
Attention :
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, MI 48174
Project Location :
John Kozuh
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
REVISED REPORT
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198704 ETC Job :
10/12/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614245 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/12/2017
614246 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/12/2017
614247 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/12/2017
614248 Asbestos Analysis15A 10/12/2017
614249 Asbestos Analysis15B 10/12/2017
614250 Asbestos Analysis15C 10/12/2017
614251 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/12/2017
614252 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/12/2017
614253 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/12/2017
614254 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/12/2017
614255 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/12/2017
614256 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/12/2017
614257 Asbestos Analysis04A 10/12/2017
614258 Asbestos Analysis04B 10/12/2017
614259 Asbestos Analysis04C 10/12/2017
614260 Asbestos Analysis05A 10/12/2017
614261 Asbestos Analysis05B 10/12/2017
614262 Asbestos Analysis05C 10/12/2017
614263 Asbestos Analysis06A 10/12/2017
614264 Asbestos Analysis06B 10/12/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 2 of 19
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198704 ETC Job :
10/12/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614265 Asbestos Analysis06C 10/12/2017
614266 Asbestos Analysis07A 10/12/2017
614267 Asbestos Analysis07B 10/12/2017
614268 Asbestos Analysis07C 10/12/2017
614269 Asbestos Analysis08A 10/12/2017
614270 Asbestos Analysis08B 10/12/2017
614271 Asbestos Analysis08C 10/12/2017
614272 Asbestos Analysis09A 10/12/2017
614273 Asbestos Analysis09B 10/12/2017
614274 Asbestos Analysis09C 10/12/2017
614275 Asbestos Analysis10A 10/12/2017
614276 Asbestos Analysis10B 10/12/2017
614277 Asbestos Analysis10C 10/12/2017
614278 Asbestos Analysis11A 10/12/2017
614279 Asbestos Analysis11B 10/12/2017
614280 Asbestos Analysis11C 10/12/2017
614281 Asbestos Analysis12A 10/12/2017
614282 Asbestos Analysis12B 10/12/2017
614283 Asbestos Analysis12C 10/12/2017
614284 Asbestos Analysis13A 10/12/2017
614285 Asbestos Analysis13B 10/12/2017
614286 Asbestos Analysis13C 10/12/2017
614287 Asbestos Analysis14A 10/12/2017
614288 Asbestos Analysis14B 10/12/2017
614289 Asbestos Analysis14C 10/12/2017
614290 Asbestos Analysis16A 10/12/2017
614291 Asbestos Analysis16B 10/12/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 3 of 19
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198704 ETC Job :
10/12/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614292 Asbestos Analysis16C 10/12/2017
614293 Asbestos Analysis17A 10/12/2017
614294 Asbestos Analysis17B 10/12/2017
614295 Asbestos Analysis17C 10/12/2017
614296 Asbestos Analysis18A 10/12/2017
614297 Asbestos Analysis18B 10/12/2017
614298 Asbestos Analysis18C 10/12/2017
614299 Asbestos Analysis19A 10/12/2017
614300 Asbestos Analysis19B 10/12/2017
614301 Asbestos Analysis19C 10/12/2017
614302 Asbestos Analysis20A 10/12/2017
614303 Asbestos Analysis20B 10/12/2017
614304 Asbestos Analysis20C 10/12/2017
614305 Asbestos Analysis21A 10/12/2017
614306 Asbestos Analysis21B 10/12/2017
614307 Asbestos Analysis21C 10/12/2017
614308 Asbestos Analysis22A 10/12/2017
614309 Asbestos Analysis22B 10/12/2017
614310 Asbestos Analysis22C 10/12/2017
614311 Asbestos Analysis23A 10/12/2017
614312 Asbestos Analysis23B 10/12/2017
614313 Asbestos Analysis23C 10/12/2017
614314 Asbestos Analysis24A 10/12/2017
614315 Asbestos Analysis24B 10/12/2017
614316 Asbestos Analysis24C 10/12/2017
614317 Asbestos Analysis25A 10/12/2017
614318 Asbestos Analysis25B 10/12/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 4 of 19
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198704 ETC Job :
10/12/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614319 Asbestos Analysis25C 10/12/2017
614320 Asbestos Analysis26A 10/12/2017
614321 Asbestos Analysis26B 10/12/2017
614322 Asbestos Analysis26C 10/12/2017
Reviewed by:
Quality Assurance Coordinator
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 5 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
40% Chrysotile614245
01A10% Other50% CelluloseWhitePipe Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614246
01B Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614247
01C Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
65% Chrysotile614248
15A 35% CelluloseWhitePaper Stack Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614249
15B Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614250
15C Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 6 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614251
02A80% Other20% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614251
02A90% Other10% Other fibrousGrey/TanMud
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614251
02A35% Other65% CelluloseTanTape
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614252
02B85% Other15% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614252
02B85% Other5% Cellulose
10% Other fibrous
Grey/WhiteMud
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614252
02B45% Other55% CelluloseGreyTape
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 7 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614253
02C80% Other20% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614253
02C97% Other3% CelluloseGreyMud
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614253
02C40% Other60% CelluloseGreyTape
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614254
03A97% Other3% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glitter)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614254
03A91% Other9% CelluloseBlack/TanMastic/Glue
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614255
03B97% Other3% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glitter)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS7
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614255
03B90% Other10% CelluloseBlack/TanMastic/Glue
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS7
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 8 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614256
03C96% Other4% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glitter)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS7
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614256
03C90% Other10% CelluloseBlack/TanMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS7
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
2% Chrysotile614257
04A95% Other3% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glutter)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614258
04B Not Analyzed
FS11
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614259
04C Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614260
05A94% Other6% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614261
05B93% Other7% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS11
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 9 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614262
05C90% Other10% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614263
06A98% Other2% CelluloseBrown12x12 Floor Tile (Flower)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614264
06B99% Other1% CelluloseBrown12x12 Floor Tile (Flower)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS7
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614265
06C100% Other Brown12x12 Floor Tile (Flower)
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614266
07A98% Other2% CelluloseBeige/Tan12x12 Peel/Stick
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
PC None Detected614266
07A92% Other8% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 10 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614267
07B99% Other1% CelluloseBeige/TanLinoleum
Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
PC None Detected614267
07B98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic
Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614268
07C99% Other1% CelluloseBeige/TanLinoleum
Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614268
07C98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614269
08A99% Other1% CelluloseWood Grain12x12 Peel/Stick
Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614269
08A99% Other1% CelluloseGrey/BlackMastic
Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 11 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614270
08B98% Other2% CelluloseTan/Orange12x12 Peel/Stick
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614270
08B98% Other2% CelluloseGrey/BlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614271
08C97% Other3% CelluloseTan/Orange12x12 Peel/Stick
Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614271
08C99% Other1% CelluloseGreyMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS4
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614272
09A90% Other10% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614273
09B90% Other10% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614274
09C85% Other15% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment
Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 12 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614275
10A25% Other75% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614276
10B30% Other70% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614277
10C20% Other80% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614278
11A99% Other1% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614279
11B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614280
11C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614281
12A85% Other15% CelluloseBlackWire Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 13 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614282
12B80% Other20% CelluloseBlackWire Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614283
12C75% Other25% CelluloseBlackWire Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614284
13A100% Other GreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614285
13B100% Other GreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS11
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614286
13C99% Other1% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
2% Chrysotile614287
14A96% Other2% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614288
14B Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 14 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
614289
14C Not Analyzed
FS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
2% Chrysotile614290
16A96% Other2% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614291
16B Not Analyzed
FS3
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614292
16C Not Analyzed
FS5
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614293
17A94% Other6% CelluloseYellowWindow Glaze
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614294
17B98% Other2% CelluloseYellowWindow Glaze
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614295
17C99% Other1% CelluloseYellowWindow Glaze
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS12
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 15 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
4% Chrysotile614296
18A96% Other WhiteExterior Caulk
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614297
18B Not Analyzed
Ext House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614298
18C Not Analyzed
Ext House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614299
19A2% Other98% CelluloseBrownAttic Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614300
19B5% Other95% CelluloseBrownAttic Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614301
19C5% Other95% CelluloseBrownAttic Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: OJ Ivey
12% Chrysotile614302
20A83% Other5% CelluloseGreyTransite Siding
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 16 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
614303
20B Not Analyzed
Ext House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
614304
20C Not Analyzed
Ext House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614305
21A10% Other90% CelluloseBlack/TanFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614306
21B15% Other85% CelluloseBlack/TanFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614307
21C20% Other80% CelluloseBlack/TanFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614308
22A10% Other90% CelluloseTan/SilverHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614309
22B5% Other95% CelluloseTan/SilverHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 17 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614310
22C2% Other98% CelluloseTan/SilverHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614311
23A3% Other97% CelluloseTanVapor Barrier
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614312
23B2% Other98% CelluloseTanVapor Barrier
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614313
23C10% Other90% CelluloseTanVapor Barrier
Fibrous
HomogenousFS7
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614314
24A85% Other15% Mineral woolGreyRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614315
24B90% Other10% Mineral woolGreyRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614316
24C85% Other15% Mineral woolGreyRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 18 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614317
25A3% Other97% CelluloseBlackIce Shield
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614318
25B5% Other95% CelluloseBlackIce Shield
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614319
25C5% Other95% CelluloseBlackIce Shield
Fibrous
HomogenousExt Garage
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614320
26A94% Other6% Mineral woolBlack/GreyRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614321
26B95% Other5% FiberglassBlack/GreyRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
None Detected614322
26C90% Other10% Mineral woolBlack/GreyRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: OJ Ivey
Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory
Analyst: OJ Ivey
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 19 of 19
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198704
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/01/2017
10/12/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")
Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples
EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com
APPENDIX B
SITE MAP
CL
1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198704
House Exterior 14
N
FS 1
FS 2 FS 3
FS 4 FS 5 FS 6
FS 7
FS 8
02A
02B
02C 03A
03B
03C 06A 06B
06C
07A
08A 08B
08C
09ABC
10A
10B
10C
11ABC
16A 16B
16C
18A
18B
18C
19A
19B
19C
20A
20B
20C
22A
22B
22C
23A
23B
23C
24A
24B 25A
25B 26A
26B
26C
CL
CL
CL
CL
1st floor
FS 9
1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198704
FS 10
FS 11
FS 12
01A
01B
01C
04A
04B
04C
05A
05B
05C
07B
07C
12A
12B
12C
13A
13B
13C 14ABC
15ABC
17A
17B
17C
FS 9
Basement
N
1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198704
21A
21B
21C
24C
25C
Garage
Garage 13
N
APPENDIX C
STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF
INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH
NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:
762 Ford Blvd. Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Prepared for:
City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd.
Lincoln Park, MI 48146 313-386-1817
Prepared By:
ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600
10/01/2017
ETC Job #: 198703
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) Introduction
2) Information about Asbestos Inspections
a) Sampling Procedures
b) PLM Analysis Methodology
c) Interpretation of Inspection Results
3) Regulatory Requirements
a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements
b) NESHAPs Requirements
c) Notification Requirements
d) Abatement Requirements
4) Summary and Conclusions
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
5) Inspector’s Information/Certification
Appendices
Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results
Appendix B – Site Map
Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish
1. Introduction
City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/01/2017.
The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.
ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.
Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.
Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.
2. Information about Asbestos Inspections
a. Sampling Procedures
Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:
• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)
It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the
analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.
Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).
b. PLM Analysis Methodology
PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).
Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.
According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.
c. Interpretation of Inspection Results
A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).
A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.
3. Regulatory Requirements
There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.
a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations
The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:
• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination
facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or
more).
Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.
In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.
b. NESHAP Requirements
Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:
• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor
covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)
In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:
• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable
• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.
• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.
• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.
It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.
c. Notification Requirements
When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.
If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.
If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.
For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.
In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.
d. Abatement Requirements
Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:
• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is
occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in
the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal
activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final
asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.
• Meet all other current regulations and standards.
In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:
• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)
• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report
By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.
4. Summary and Conclusions
ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.
As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.
ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not
included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.
On the following charts, please find:
• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.
Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.
Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content
Material #
Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location
(Refer to map in Appendix B)
1 Plaster Over Drywall, White No 4,350 SF Throughout
2 Duct Wrap, White YES 655 SF Basement
3 Wire Insulation, White w/ Green Specs
No 20 LF FS 3
4 Blow-In Insulation, White No 1,092 SF Throughout
5 Chimney Mortar, Gray No 15 SF FS 2
6 Stack Cement, White No 5 SF FS 9
7 Window Glazing, White YES 7 Units All Windows
8 Foundation Cement, Gray No 800 SF Throughout Basement
9 Floor Underlayment, Black No 750 SF FS 1,2,3,4,12,13
10 Floor Tile, 9x9, Brown YES 88 SF FS 8 & 11
11 Mastic, Black No 88 SF FS 8 & 11
12 Linoleum, Green Cobble No 125 SF FS 6 & 8
13 Mastic, Tan No 125 SF FS 6 & 8
14 12x12, Peel & Stick, Gray Lattice No 125 SF FS 6
15 Floor Tile, 9x9, Green No 115 SF FS 6
16 Linoleum, Black w/ Multi-Color No 95 SF FS 2
17 Transite Siding, Gray YES 1,400 SF Exterior House
18 House Wrap, Black No 1,400 SF Exterior House
19 Fiberboard, Brown No 1,400 SF Exterior House
20 Roof Shingles, Black No 1,250 SF Exterior House
5. Inspector’s Information
All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.
This report reviewed and submitted by:
Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS
Page 1 of 14
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174
(734) 955-6600
Fax: (734) 955-6604
To :
Attention :
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Romulus, MI 48174
Project Location :
John Kozuh
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198703 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614110 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/11/2017
614111 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/11/2017
614112 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/11/2017
614113 Asbestos Analysis01D 10/11/2017
614114 Asbestos Analysis01E 10/11/2017
614115 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/11/2017
614116 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/11/2017
614117 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/11/2017
614118 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/11/2017
614119 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/11/2017
614120 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/11/2017
614121 Asbestos Analysis04A 10/11/2017
614122 Asbestos Analysis04B 10/11/2017
614123 Asbestos Analysis04C 10/11/2017
614124 Asbestos Analysis05A 10/11/2017
614125 Asbestos Analysis05B 10/11/2017
614126 Asbestos Analysis05C 10/11/2017
614127 Asbestos Analysis06A 10/11/2017
614128 Asbestos Analysis06B 10/11/2017
614129 Asbestos Analysis06C 10/11/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 2 of 14
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198703 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614130 Asbestos Analysis07A 10/11/2017
614131 Asbestos Analysis07B 10/11/2017
614132 Asbestos Analysis07C 10/11/2017
614133 Asbestos Analysis08A 10/11/2017
614134 Asbestos Analysis08B 10/11/2017
614135 Asbestos Analysis08C 10/11/2017
614136 Asbestos Analysis09A 10/11/2017
614137 Asbestos Analysis09B 10/11/2017
614138 Asbestos Analysis09C 10/11/2017
614139 Asbestos Analysis10A 10/11/2017
614140 Asbestos Analysis10B 10/11/2017
614141 Asbestos Analysis10C 10/11/2017
614142 Asbestos Analysis11A 10/11/2017
614143 Asbestos Analysis11B 10/11/2017
614144 Asbestos Analysis11C 10/11/2017
614145 Asbestos Analysis12A 10/11/2017
614146 Asbestos Analysis12B 10/11/2017
614147 Asbestos Analysis12C 10/11/2017
614148 Asbestos Analysis13A 10/11/2017
614149 Asbestos Analysis13B 10/11/2017
614150 Asbestos Analysis13C 10/11/2017
614151 Asbestos Analysis14A 10/11/2017
614152 Asbestos Analysis14B 10/11/2017
614153 Asbestos Analysis14C 10/11/2017
614154 Asbestos Analysis15A 10/11/2017
614155 Asbestos Analysis15B 10/11/2017
614156 Asbestos Analysis15C 10/11/2017
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 3 of 14
Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed
198703 ETC Job :
10/11/2017Report Date :
Client Project : 20014199
614157 Asbestos Analysis16A 10/11/2017
614158 Asbestos Analysis16B 10/11/2017
614159 Asbestos Analysis16C 10/11/2017
614160 Asbestos Analysis17A 10/11/2017
614161 Asbestos Analysis17B 10/11/2017
614162 Asbestos Analysis17C 10/11/2017
614163 Asbestos Analysis18A 10/11/2017
614164 Asbestos Analysis18B 10/11/2017
614165 Asbestos Analysis18C 10/11/2017
614166 Asbestos Analysis19A 10/11/2017
614167 Asbestos Analysis19B 10/11/2017
614168 Asbestos Analysis19C 10/11/2017
614169 Asbestos Analysis20A 10/11/2017
614170 Asbestos Analysis20B 10/11/2017
614171 Asbestos Analysis20C 10/11/2017
Reviewed by:
Quality Assurance Coordinator
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended
recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.
Page 4 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614110
01A98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614110
01A97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteSkim
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614110
01A95% Other5% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614111
01B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614111
01B97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteSkim
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614111
01B95% Other5% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 5 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614112
01C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614112
01C98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteSkim
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614112
01C97% Other3% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS5
Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614113
01D98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614113
01D97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteSkim
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614113
01D97% Other3% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 6 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614114
01E98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS13
Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614114
01E98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteSkim
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS13
Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614114
01E95% Other5% CelluloseGreyDrywall
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS13
Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell
25% Chrysotile614115
02A60% Other15% CelluloseWhiteDuct Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
614116
02B Not Analyzed
FS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
614117
02C Not Analyzed
FS10
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614118
03A20% Other80% CelluloseWhiteWire Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 7 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614119
03B25% Other75% CelluloseWhiteWire Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614120
03C25% Other75% CelluloseWhiteWire Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614121
04A28% Other2% Cellulose
50% Mineral wool
20% Fiberglass
WhiteBlown Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614122
04B17% Other3% Cellulose
60% Mineral wool
20% Fiberglass
WhiteBlown Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS1
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614123
04C8% Other2% Cellulose
75% Mineral wool
15% Fiberglass
WhiteBlown Insulation
Fibrous
HomogenousFS13
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614124
05A98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614125
05B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 8 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614126
05C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614127
06A98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614128
06B98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614129
06C97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
2% Chrysotile614130
07A95% Other3% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
614131
07B Not Analyzed
FS1
Analyst: Scott Larabell
614132
07C Not Analyzed
FS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 9 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614133
08A98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614134
08B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS9
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614135
08C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS10
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614136
09A20% Other80% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment
Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614137
09B25% Other75% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment
Fibrous
HomogenousFS3
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614138
09C25% Other75% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment
Fibrous
HomogenousFS13
Analyst: Scott Larabell
2% Chrysotile614139
10A96% Other2% CelluloseBrown9x9 Floor Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS11
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 10 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
614140
10B Not Analyzed
FS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
614141
10C Not Analyzed
FS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614142
11A97% Other3% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS11
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614143
11B98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614144
11C98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614145
12A98% Other2% CelluloseGreen CobbleLinoleum
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614146
12B97% Other3% CelluloseGreen CobbleLinoleum
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 11 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614147
12C97% Other3% CelluloseGreen CobbleLinoleum
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614148
13A98% Other2% CelluloseTanMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614149
13B98% Other2% CelluloseTanMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614150
13C98% Other2% CelluloseTanMastic
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS8
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614151
14A97% Other3% CelluloseGrey12x12 Peel/Stick
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614152
14B98% Other2% CelluloseGrey12x12 Peel/Stick
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614153
14C98% Other2% CelluloseGrey12x12 Peel/Stick
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 12 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614154
15A97% Other3% CelluloseGreen9x9 Floor Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614155
15B97% Other3% CelluloseGreen9x9 Floor Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614156
15C97% Other3% CelluloseGreen9x9 Floor Tile
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS6
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614157
16A40% Other60% CelluloseBlack/Multi-ColorLinoleum
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614158
16B35% Other65% CelluloseBlack/Multi-ColorLinoleum
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614159
16C40% Other60% CelluloseBlack/Multi-ColorLinoleum
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousFS2
Analyst: Scott Larabell
25% Chrysotile614160
17A60% Other15% CelluloseGreyTransite Siding
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 13 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
614161
17B Not Analyzed
Ext House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
614162
17C Not Analyzed
Ext House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614163
18A20% Other80% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614164
18B40% Other60% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614165
18C35% Other65% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614166
19A20% Other80% CelluloseBrownFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614167
19B25% Other75% CelluloseBrownFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
Page 14 of 14
Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :
To :
Romulus,MI 48174
Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.
38900 Huron River Drive
Vacant Residence
762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146
ETC Job :
Client Project :
198703
20014199
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,
Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos
10/06/2017
10/11/2017
10/06/2017
Date Collected :
Date Received :
Date Analyzed :
None Detected614168
19C25% Other75% CelluloseBrownFiber Board
Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614169
20A95% Other5% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614170
20B97% Other3% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
None Detected614171
20C95% Other5% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle
Non-Fibrous
HomogenousExt House
Analyst: Scott Larabell
Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory
Analyst: Scott Larabell
400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")
Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples
Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples
EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,
Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or
resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the
responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any
PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is
considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are
related to only to samples that were tested.
PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com
APPENDIX B
SITE MAP
01D
CL
762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198703
FS 1 FS 2
FS 3
FS 4
FS 5
FS 6
01A
01B
01C
03ABC
04A
04B
05ABC
07A
07B 07C
09A
09B
12AB
13AB
14ABC
15ABC
16ABC
17A
17B
17C
18A
18B
18C
19A
19B
19C
20A
20B
20C
FS 7 FS 8
1st floor
N
01E
762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198703
2nd floor
FS 12
FS 13
04C
09C
FS 7
N
762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146
Please Note: This is a rough floor plan
only. All items, (doorways, Windows,
etc.) may not be included in this illus-
tration. Also, room and component
sizes are not drawn to scale.
City of Lincoln Park
198703
FS 9
FS 10
FS 11
02A
02B
02C
06A
06B
06C
08A
08B
08C
10AB
10C
11AB
11C
12C 13C
FS 8
Basement
N
APPENDIX C
STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF
INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH