contract documents may be obtained from the mitn website ...87310170-b96f-4822... · the bidder...

155
Invitation to Bid City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359 Riverbank (garage only) The City of Lincoln Park is accepting bids for the Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359 Riverbank (garage only) located in the City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan The City of Lincoln Park is accepting bids for the Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359 Riverbank (garage only) in the City of Lincoln Park. The location of the structures may be found within the bidding documents. Bids shall be submitted on the forms provided by the City of Lincoln Park. Bids shall be submitted in a sealed envelope and have written on the face of the envelope the bidders name and the name of the project “Demolitions”. Bids must be received by 10:00 a.m. Wednesday November 29, 2017 Donna Breeding, City Clerk, City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Road Lincoln Park, Michigan 48146 Bids shall be publicly opened and read at: 10:00 a.m., (local time), Wednesday November 29, 2017 City of Lincoln Park Municipal Office Building 1355 Southfield Road Lincoln Park, Michigan 48146 Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website at www.mitn.info Any questions pertaining the Contract Documents should be forwarded to DPS Director, John Kozuh at (313) 215-4109. The City of Lincoln Park reserves the right to waive any irregularity, accept or reject any or all bids, and to accept proposals that, in the City’s opinion, are in the best interest of and to the advantage of the City of Lincoln Park. No bidder may withdraw his bid within 90 days after the date of bid opening.

Upload: phungphuc

Post on 21-May-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Invitation to Bid

City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan

Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359

Riverbank (garage only)

The City of Lincoln Park is accepting bids for the

Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933 Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359

Riverbank (garage only) located in the

City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan

The City of Lincoln Park is accepting bids for the Demolition of Structures at 762 Ford, 1933

Moran, 1520 Pagel and 1359 Riverbank (garage only) in the City of Lincoln Park. The location

of the structures may be found within the bidding documents. Bids shall be submitted on the

forms provided by the City of Lincoln Park. Bids shall be submitted in a sealed envelope and

have written on the face of the envelope the bidders name and the name of the project

“Demolitions”.

Bids must be received by 10:00 a.m. Wednesday November 29, 2017

Donna Breeding, City Clerk, City of Lincoln Park

1355 Southfield Road

Lincoln Park, Michigan 48146

Bids shall be publicly opened and read at:

10:00 a.m., (local time), Wednesday November 29, 2017

City of Lincoln Park

Municipal Office Building

1355 Southfield Road

Lincoln Park, Michigan 48146

Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website at www.mitn.info

Any questions pertaining the Contract Documents should be forwarded to DPS Director,

John Kozuh at (313) 215-4109.

The City of Lincoln Park reserves the right to waive any irregularity, accept or reject any or all

bids, and to accept proposals that, in the City’s opinion, are in the best interest of and to the

advantage of the City of Lincoln Park. No bidder may withdraw his bid within 90 days after the

date of bid opening.

Page 2: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 1 of 16

Invitation To Bid

City of Lincoln Park, Wayne County, Michigan

Demolition of Structures

762 Ford Blvd.

1933 Moran

1520 Pagel

1359 Riverbank (Garage Only)

Page 3: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 2 of 16

Table of Contents:

I. Instructions to Bidders

II. General Requirements

III. Demolition Specifications

IV. Bid Form

V. Section 3 Business Concern Statement

VI. Asbestos Report

Page 4: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 3 of 16

I. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The City of Lincoln Park reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to award the Contract to

other than the low bidder, and to waive irregularities and/or formalities. Proposals shall be based

only upon the requirements described in the Demolition Specifications and Exhibit “A” to the

demolition specifications. Suggested alternate proposals for work other than that specified may

be given consideration.

TIME FOR COMPLETION: The bidder will be required to agree, if awarded a Contract, to

complete the Work on or before the Contract completion date as stated in the Contract and no

later than 30 days from award.

All work must be completed within 30 days of the notice to proceed communication from the

City of Lincoln Park. Failure to complete the work within 30 days will result in a two hundred

dollar ($200.00) per calendar day penalty, with said penalty to be deducted from the bid price.

In the event the work is not completed to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln Park, the City

may hire a replacement contractor to complete the work. Any additional cost incurred by the City

shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Fees paid to any replacement contractor will be

deducted from amounts owned to contractor.

CONTRACTORS WITH SUBCONTRACTORS: All Contracts made by the successful

bidder with subcontractors shall be covered by the terms and conditions of the Contract. The

successful bidder shall see to it that his subcontractors are fully informed in regard to these terms

and conditions.

EXPLANATION TO BIDDERS BY ADDENDUM: Neither the City of Lincoln Park nor its

Representative will give verbal answers to inquiries regarding the specifications, or give verbal

instructions previous to award of the contract. Any verbal statements regarding same by any

person, previous to award, shall be unauthorized.

Explanations desired by bidders shall be requested of the City of Lincoln Park in writing, and if

explanations are necessary, a reply will be made in the form of an addendum, a copy of which

will be forwarded to each bidder whose work is affected. No inquiry received within five (5)

days of the date fixed as the bid date will be given consideration.

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: Addenda issued to bidders prior to date of receipt of

proposals shall become part of the Contract Documents, and proposals shall include the work

described.

INSPECTION OF THE SITE: Before submitting a proposal, each bidder shall personally

inspect the site of the proposed work to arrive at a clear understanding of the conditions under

which the Work is to be done.

The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have

satisfied himself as to the conditions of the premises, the Project Site, existing obstructions, and

any other conditions affecting the Work before deliver of his proposal.

Page 5: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 4 of 16

No allowance or extra consideration on behalf of the Contractor will subsequently be allowed by

reason or error or oversight on the part on the Contractor, or on account of interference by the

Owner, or by other contractors’ activities.

Submission of proposal implies that the bidder is conversant with all site and building conditions

under which the Work will be conducted.

TAXES: All proposals in original contract work, and for all other work thereunder, shall include

all applicable taxes, including social security, unemployment and sales or use taxes, and any other

taxes specifically levied on the work or on wages by local, city, state or federal government,

except real property taxes on the site. Proposals shall also include cost of permits and other like

payments, charges, and costs incidental to work covered by the Contract Documents.

CONTRACT: The contract shall be deemed as having been awarded when formal notice shall

have been duly served upon the intended awardee by an officer of the City of Lincoln Park duly

authorized to give such notice.

Page 6: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 5 of 16

II. General Requirements

1. USE OF PREMISES: The contractor expressly undertakes at his own expense:

A. To take every precautions against injuries to persons or damage to property,

compliance to MIOSHA rules.

B. To comply with the regulations governing the use of premises which are

occupied and to perform his Contract in such a manner as not to interrupt or

interfere with the operations of the City of Lincoln Park.

C. To store his apparatus, materials, supplies and equipment in such orderly fashion

at the site of Work as will not unduly interfere with the progress of his work or

the Work of any subcontractors.

D. To place upon the Work or any part thereof only such loads as are consistent with

the safety of that portion of the Work.

2. CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT:

A. The Contractors shall provide the services of a competent superintendent from

the beginning of the Work to the date of final completion of the Contract.

B. The Superintendent shall be at all times in charge of the work and shall be

provided with such assistance as is necessary to properly carry on the individual

items of the work.

C. The Contractors shall also provide a staff adequate to coordinate and expedite the

work properly and shall at all times maintain competent supervision of its own

work and that of its subcontractors to insure compliance with Contract

requirements.

D. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all constructions means, methods,

techniques, sequences and procedures and for coordinating all portions of the

work under the Contract.

E. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and

supervising all safety precautions and programs connected with the work.

3. CLEANING

A. The Contractor shall at all times keep the premises and the adjoining premises,

driveways and streets clean of rubbish caused by the Contractors operations and

at the completion of the work shall remove all the rubbish, all of his tools,

equipment, temporary work and surplus materials, from and about the premises,

and shall leave the work site clean and ready for use. If the Contractor does not

attend to such cleaning immediately upon request, the City of Lincoln Park may

cause such cleaning to be done by others and charge the cost of same to the

Page 7: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 6 of 16

Contractor.

B. The Contractor will be responsible for all damage from fire which originates in,

or is propagated by, accumulations of rubbish or debris.

C. All rubbish and debris shall be disposed of off the project site in an approved

sanitary landfill site. No open burning of debris or rubbish will be permitted.

The job site shall be left neat and clean at the completion of each day's

operations. Proof of disposal tickets to be provided to the City.

D. Final Clean-up. In addition to all of the above requirements, upon completion of

the Work or of an individual sections thereof, the Contractor, immediately prior

to turning over the work or completed portion thereof to the Owner, shall arrange

for the proper and complete cleaning by washing all soiled concrete walks and

driveways.

4. TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE:

A. All charges for electrical power energy used for temporary lighting and power

required for this work will be paid by the Contractor.

B. The Contractor shall provide and maintain any temporary electrical service

required for this work. At the completion of the work, all such temporary

electrical facilities shall be removed and disposed of by the Contractor.

C. Temporary service shall comply with the regulations and requirements of the

National Electrical Code and any other local rules and regulations governing

temporary electrical installation.

5. CONTRACTORS MEASUREMENTS: Before ordering material, preparing shop

drawings, or doing any work, each Contractor shall verify, at the building, all dimensions

which may affect his work. He assumes full responsibility for the accuracy of his figures.

No allowance for additional compensation will be considered for discrepancies between

dimensions on the Drawings and actual field dimensions.

6. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY: It is not the responsibility of the City of

Lincoln Park or its representative to notify the Contractor or subcontractor(s) when to

commence, to cease, or to resume work; not in any way to superintend so as to relieve the

Contractor of responsibility or of any consequences of neglect or carelessness by him or

his subordinates. All material and labor shall be furnished at time best suited for all

Contractors and subcontractors concerned, so that the combined work of all shall be

properly and fully completed on the date fixed by the contract.

7. PROGRESS MEETINGS: When directed by the City of Lincoln Park or its

representative, meetings shall be held for the purpose of coordinating and expediting the

work. The invited contractors or subcontractors will be required to have qualified

representatives at these meetings, empowered to act in their behalf.

8. WORK SCHEDULE: Before the signing of the contract, a definite time schedule shall

be agreed upon in general by all parties concerned, and within a reasonable time after the

Contractor has been notified by the City of Lincoln Park of being awarded the contract,

Page 8: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 7 of 16

he shall submit to the owner a schedule of operations giving dates each part of branch of

Work will be started and completed. The schedule shall be made in such form as will

meet the approval of the City of Lincoln Park.

9. FIRE PREVENTION:

A. Take all precautions to eliminate possible fire hazards at the site, including but

not limited to enforcing the following requirements:

• All combustible debris shall be removed from the building and storage areas

on a daily basis, including empty paint container, oily rags, etc.

• No bitumen heating kettles allowed in the building, or within 50 feet of the

building exterior walls, except upon special arrangement with the City of

Lincoln Park's representative and with written authorization from him

designating the exact locations.

• All tarpaulin or other covers for stored materials, opening in walls, etc. shall

be flameproof.

• No Open fires on the sites.

• Avoid storage of large quantities of flammable materials at the site, as far as

possible.

• Gasoline may not be stored in any building at any stage of construction.

10. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS:

A. Code Listing: Any reference to standards of any society, institute, associations or

governmental agency which is part of the building code in effect for this project

shall comply with the edition date published in the reference edition of the

building code.

B. Non-code Listings: Any reference to standards of any society, institute,

association, or governmental agency which is not part of the building code for

this project shall be the edition in effect at the time of opening of bids, except as

otherwise specifically stated in the this project manual.

C. Project Manual Listing: Edition dates listed with reference standard in each

Section of this Project Manual are included for reference only.

11. INSPECTION AND TESTS:

A. All submittal required by the specification shall be submitted in the number listed

under an individual specification section.

Page 9: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 8 of 16

B. Each submittal shall be covered by transmittal letter in duplicate, properly

identified with the project title and number and a brief description of the item

being submitted.

12. SUBMITTAL:

A. All submittal required by the specifications shall be submitted in the number

listed under an individual specification section.

B. Each submittal shall be covered by a transmittal letter in duplicate, properly

identified with the project title and number and a brief description of the item

being submitted.

13. ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND PROCEDURES:

A. Promptly report in writing to the City of Lincoln Park's representative or its

appointee accidents which cause death, personnel injury or property damages,

arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work whether on or

adjacent to the site. Where death or serious injuries or serious damages are

caused, the accident shall be reported immediately by telephone or messenger to

the City of Lincoln Park's representative or its appointee.

B. If any claim is made by anyone against the contractor or any subcontractor on

account of any accident, promptly report the facts in writing to the City of

Lincoln Park's representative or its appointee giving full detail of the claim.

14. PROJECT SAFETY:

A. CONTRACTOR assumes full responsibility for complying with and enforcing all

rules and regulations of all Federal, State and Municipal authorities having

jurisdiction, as outline in the General Conditions, including those of any

Occupational Safety and Health Act.

B. The requirements outlined hereinafter are to be considered as minimal, and where

the requirements of any of the above authorities having jurisdiction conflict with

the requirements of this section, the maximum condition shall prevail.

C. Any items damaged due to failure to comply with these requirements shall be

corrected or replaced, to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln Park’s

Representative without cost to the City of Lincoln Park.

D. CONTRACTOR assumes full responsibility for enforcing compliance with any

protective measures indicated in specific sections of the work.

E. CONTRACTOR to provide all barricades, night lanterns, guard rails and other

safety measures at excavations and other points of danger in accordance with the

requirements of Federal, State and Municipal regulations.

15. BID BOND: A Bid Bond or Certified Check in the amount of five percent (5%) of the

bidder’s proposal will be required by the City of Lincoln Park.

Page 10: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 9 of 16

16. PERFORMANCE BOND: The following bonds shall be deliver to the City of Lincoln

Park and shall become binding upon the parties upon execution of the contract and

acceptance of the bid.

A. A performance bond satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, exercised by a

surety company authorized to do business in this state or otherwise secured in a

manner satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, in an amount equal to 100% of

the price specified.

B. A payment bond, satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, executed by a surety

company authorized to do business in this state or otherwise secured in a manner

satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park, for the protection of all persons

supplying labor and materials to the contractor or its subcontractors for the

performance of the work provided for in the contract. The bond shall equal

100% of the price specified in the contract.

17. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: The Contractor will be required to meet our

standard insurance requirements. Unless otherwise specified the Contractor shall, before

commencing work hereunder, procure and thereafter maintain polices of insurance

satisfactory to the City of Lincoln Park with the City of Lincoln Park an additionally

named insured in the following minimum amounts with specific coverage which

includes underground, explosion, and collapse.

Property Damage $1,000,000 (each accident)

Bodily injury $ 500,000 (each person)

$1,000,000 (each accident)

Workmen's Compensation Insurance: All Liability imposed Workmen's

Compensations stature

Employer's Liability Insurance $ 100,000

Contractual Liability Insurance $ 500,000

Completed Operations Insurance $ 500,000

Owned, Hired and Non-Ownership

Vehicle Bodily Injury and Property

Damaged to the Following Limits

Bodily injury, including accidental death $500,000 (ea/person);

$1,000,000 (ea/accident)

Property damage $1,000,000 (ea/accident)

SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION

The bidder shall list below information concerning any subcontractor who will be performing

work at the Project site:

SUBCONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK AMOUNT

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

TOTAL $________________________

Page 11: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 10 of 16

TIME OF COMPLETION:

The work under this Contract shall be completed within thirty (30) calendar days from the Notice

to Proceed.

SCHEDULE OF VALUES:

The undersigned will submit for approval, within twenty-four (24) hours, if requested by the City

of Lincoln Park, a schedule of values, including a list of proposed subcontractors, the amounts of

their subcontracts and the fee each subcontractor intends to apply to contract changes. The

undersigned agrees in every way to be responsible for the Work, material, equipment and supplies

furnished by each subcontractor. The fee stated in the Schedule of Values by the undersigned and

those state for each subcontractor listed above by the undersigned shall include all costs for

administration onsite supervision, taxes, permit fees, overhead and profit.

ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS:

The undersigned agrees to execute a contract providing that we are notified of the acceptance

within five (5) calendar days after formal notice of award.

The undersigned has carefully examined the bidding and Contract Documents, including the

Instructions to bidder, General Conditions of the Contract, Supplemental Conditions,

Specifications, and any Addend issued, and agrees to be bound by all requirements thereof in the

submission of this proposal, and in the performance of the contract if awarded to him based on

this proposal.

The undersigned bidder does hereby declare that the bidder has the legal state checked below:

_____ Individual

_____ Co-Partnership

_____ Corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of

_____ Joint business under an assumed name.

Page 12: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 11 of 16

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

The names and addresses of all persons indicated as partners in this proposal are as follows:

NAME ADDRESS

___________________________ ______________________________________

___________________________ ______________________________________

___________________________ ______________________________________

Federal I.D.__________________ DUNS # _______________________________

This proposal is submitted in the name of:

Name of Contractor

Signature

Title

Signed and seal this_______day of_________________________, 2017.

Page 13: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 12 of 16

III. DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS

1. DRAWINGS: No drawings have been prepared to accompany these specifications.

Bidders are to provide quotes to demolish all structures listed in the City of Lincoln Park.

2. SITE VISIT: Each Contractor Bidding on this project shall visit the site(s) of the work

and personally observe the conditions under which the work will be performed. Anyone

wanting an interior inspection prior to the bid date may contact DPS Supervisor

Ron Rail at (313) 215-6096.

3. WORK INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT/ Barricades: The Contractor shall

provide sufficient barricades and fencing to secure the site and prevent trespassing in the

demolition area. Signs shall be posted to alert people of the hazardous conditions.

Razing of Structures/ The Contractor shall demolish all structures at the address

indicated in the proposal form, water shall be used to eliminate residual dust (weather

permitting).

If basement exits, the floor shall be broken into small sections and removed completely.

The contractor may use a "headache" ball or mechanical methods to

achieve this end. The Contractor will be responsible for any damage to adjacent

structures caused by vibrations or transmission of shock waves due to his operations.

Prior to backfilling, all existing public utilities and sanitary sewer leads to the main

building and/or garages shall be disconnected and plugged. This work will require

inspections by the City of Lincoln Park's Building Department and/or Water Department.

Removal of Scrap/ All items shall be removed from the existing premises:

All grass shall be cut to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln Park and trees shall be cut

and stumps grounded out at least six (6) inches below grade level.

The cost of the demolition and removal of scrap shall incorporate the scrap value of "all"

items to be removed from the premises.

Backfilling: Backfilling of the basement (if applicable) shall be done with clean fill

material. No wood, paper, or other deleterious material or construction debris shall be

used in the backfilling. Certification of clean fill must be provided.

Backfilling shall be placed in layers and backfilled to the same density as the adjacent

soil. Mechanical tampers, or rollers shall be used for this purpose.

Rough Grading:

After the site is backfilled, the Contractor shall rough grade the site for positive drainage

without draining onto adjacent side lots.

Page 14: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 13 of 16

Clean-Up:

All materials from the demolished building shall be loaded up and removed from the site

by the Contractor as a part of this project. All such materials shall become the property

of the Contractor.

4. RESTORATION OF PAVEMENTS AND SIDEWALKS:

Sidewalks are in good condition unless otherwise noted, drop curbs at driveway

approach location shall be removed and replaced with full height curb to match

existing adjacent curb, any damage caused to street pavements, curbs, sidewalks, etc.,

by the Contractor's equipment shall be repaired or replaced to the satisfaction of the City

of Lincoln Park and/or the satisfaction of the Building Department of the City of Lincoln

Park.

5. RESTORATION OF LOTS;

After completion of all clean-up and rough grading, the Contractor shall fine grade the

disturbed areas for positive drainage and provide a minimum of three inches (3") of

topsoil, seed and mulch.

Page 15: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 14 of 16

14

IV. Bid Form Return sealed bid marked “Demolition” by Wednesday November 29, 2017

at 10:00 a.m. (local time) To: Donna Breeding, City Clerk

1355 Southfield Road

Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Contractor_______________________________________________ Date_____________

Address__________________________________________________

City______________________ State_________ Zip ______________

Telephone _____________________ Fax # _____________________

Email: ________________________ DUNS #____________________

Signature: _________________________________

Printed Name & Title _______________________________________________

Proposal: The undersigned, being cognizant of all conditions governing the work and of the

requirements of the authorities having jurisdiction, and having read the Specifications for the

Work, and visited the Project site(s), purposes to furnish all labor, and equipment for demolition

of the structures listed below on the bid form located in the City of Lincoln Park, with the

respective itemized bid amounts(s):

1. Demolition and removal of all structures, foundations, footings,

service walks, driveway, driveway approach and replace curb in approach.

2. Remove floor and footings of all structures.

3. Remove any miscellaneous posts, poles or debris.

4. Remove any and all trees, bushes, and stumps located within a five (5) foot

perimeter of the structure to be demolished.

5. Contractor responsible for all environmental notification and procedures.

6. Back fill hole with clean fill. Certification of clean fill must be provided.

7. Level yard to grade, topsoil and seed area.

8. Contractor responsible for pulling all permits with the Building Department (permit

fees are $200 per location) and contacting the City of Lincoln Park’s Water

Department prior to demolition.

Location Bid Amount

762 Ford _________________

1933 Moran _________________

1520 Pagel _________________

_________________

1359 Riverbank (Garage Only) _________________

Page 16: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 15 of 16

15

762 Ford- Removal of asbestos

Containing Material and/or mold _________________

_________________

1933 Moran- Removal of asbestos

Containing Material and/or mold _________________

1520 Pagel- Removal of asbestos

Containing material and/or mold _________________

1359 Riverbank (garage only)- Removal

Of asbestos containing material and/or mold _________________

Total Bid Amount _________________

Addenda The following addenda covering changes in the work have been received during the

bidding period. The work described in said has been included in this proposal.

Addendum No _____________________________________ Date _______________

Addendum No _____________________________________ Date ________________

Page 17: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 16 of 16

16

V. LINCOLN PARK SECTION 3 BUSINESS CONCERN STATEMENT

Business Name _______________________________________________________

Business Address______________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

Contact Person ___________________________ Title ________________________

Telephone #: (___) ____________________ Cell # (___) ______________________

The Bidder certifies that it is a Section 3 Business Concern based on:

Status as a Section 3 resident-owned enterprise (at least 51% owned by Section 3 residents:

• Provide copy of resident lease, evidence of participation in public assistance program or signed Certification for Section 3 Resident.

• Provide documentation of business ownership, such as copy of articles of incorporation, partnership agreement, list of owners/stockholders and percentage ownership of each, organization chart with names and titles.

At least 30% of their permanent, full-time employees are currently Section 3 Residents or were Section 3 Residents within the past 3 years.

• Provide complete list of all permanent, full-time employees

• Provide list of employees claiming Section 3 status

• Provide documentation of Section 3 status for all applicable employees such as PHA residential lease or signed certification of Section 3 Resident.

Commitment to subcontract 25% of the dollar award to qualified Section 3 Business Concerns. (Only applicable for Prime Contractors)

• Provide list of subcontracted Section 3 business(es) and subcontract amount.

• Provide documentation of Section 3 status for applicable businesses

The Bidder in not a Section 3 Business Concern. I hereby certify that the information provided by me to be true and correct, and understand falsification of any information could subject me to disqualification from participation and punishment under the law. ____________________________________ _________________ Owner Signature Date ____________________________________ Print Name This form must be completed and returned with bid, for bid to be considered.

Page 18: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:

1359 Riverbank Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Prepared for:

City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd

Lincoln Park, MI-48146 313-386-1817

Prepared By:

ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600

10/1/17

ETC Job #: 198706

Page 19: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) Introduction

2) Information about Asbestos Inspections

a) Sampling Procedures

b) PLM Analysis Methodology

c) Interpretation of Inspection Results

3) Regulatory Requirements

a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements

b) NESHAPs Requirements

c) Notification Requirements

d) Abatement Requirements

4) Summary and Conclusions

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

5) Inspector’s Information/Certification

Appendices

Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results

Appendix B – Site Map

Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish

Page 20: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1. Introduction

City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/1/17.

The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.

ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.

Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.

Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.

2. Information about Asbestos Inspections

a. Sampling Procedures

Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:

• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)

It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the

Page 21: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.

Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).

b. PLM Analysis Methodology

PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).

Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.

According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.

c. Interpretation of Inspection Results

A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).

A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.

Page 22: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

3. Regulatory Requirements

There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.

a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations

The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:

• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination

facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or

more).

Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.

In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.

b. NESHAP Requirements

Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:

• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor

covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)

Page 23: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:

• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable

• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.

• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.

• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.

It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.

c. Notification Requirements

When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.

If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.

If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.

For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.

In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.

d. Abatement Requirements

Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:

Page 24: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is

occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in

the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal

activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final

asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.

• Meet all other current regulations and standards.

In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:

• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)

• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report

By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.

4. Summary and Conclusions

ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.

As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.

ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not

Page 25: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.

On the following charts, please find:

• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.

Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.

Page 26: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

5. Inspector’s Information

All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.

This report reviewed and submitted by:

Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

Material # Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location

(Refer to map in Appendix B)

1 Roof Shingle Black w/ White Specks

No 440 SF Exterior Garage

2 Roof Shingle Black with Red Specks

No 440 SF Exterior Garage

3 Foundation Cement No 360 SF Interior Garage

Page 27: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDICES

Page 28: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX A

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS

Page 29: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 1 of 4

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To :

Attention :

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, MI 48174

Project Location :

John Kozuh

Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY

1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

REVISED REPORT

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198706 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614236 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/11/2017

614237 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/11/2017

614238 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/11/2017

614239 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/11/2017

614240 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/11/2017

614241 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/11/2017

614242 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/11/2017

614243 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/11/2017

614244 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/11/2017

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 30: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 2 of 4

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY

1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198706

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614236

01A90% Other10% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle (White Specks)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614236

01A88% Other12% CelluloseBlack/White/GreyBacking

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614237

01B97% Other3% CelluloseBlack/WhiteRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614237

01B95% Other5% CelluloseBlackBacking

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614238

01C98% Other2% CelluloseBlack/WhiteRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614238

01C97% Other3% CelluloseBlackBacking

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 31: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 3 of 4

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY

1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198706

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614239

02A98% Other2% CelluloseBlack/RedRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614239

02A98% Other2% CelluloseBlackBacking

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614240

02B97% Other3% CelluloseBlack/RedRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614240

02B98% Other2% CelluloseBlackBacking

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614241

02C95% Other5% CelluloseBlack/RedRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-1 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614241

02C98% Other2% CelluloseBlackBacking

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Layer-2 Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614242

03A95% Other5% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousInt Garage

Analyst: Liliane Mason

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 32: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 4 of 4

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence - Garage ONLY

1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198706

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614243

03B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousInt Garage

Analyst: Liliane Mason

None Detected614244

03C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousInt Garage

Analyst: Liliane Mason

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Analyst: Liliane Mason

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 33: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com

Page 34: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 35: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX B

SITE MAP

Page 36: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1359 Riverbank, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198706

Garage 1

N

01A 01B

01C

02A

02B

02C

03A

03B

03C

Garage

Page 37: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX C

STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF

INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH

Page 38: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 39: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 40: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:

1520 Pagel Ave Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Prepared for:

City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd

Lincoln Park, MI-48146 313-386-1817

Prepared By:

ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600

10/1/17

ETC Job #: 198705

Page 41: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) Introduction

2) Information about Asbestos Inspections

a) Sampling Procedures

b) PLM Analysis Methodology

c) Interpretation of Inspection Results

3) Regulatory Requirements

a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements

b) NESHAPs Requirements

c) Notification Requirements

d) Abatement Requirements

4) Summary and Conclusions

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

5) Inspector’s Information/Certification

Appendices

Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results

Appendix B – Site Map

Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish

Page 42: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1. Introduction

City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/1/17.

The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.

ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.

Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.

Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.

2. Information about Asbestos Inspections

a. Sampling Procedures

Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:

• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)

It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the

Page 43: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.

Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).

b. PLM Analysis Methodology

PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).

Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.

According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.

c. Interpretation of Inspection Results

A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).

A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.

Page 44: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

3. Regulatory Requirements

There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.

a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations

The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:

• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination

facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or

more).

Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.

In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.

b. NESHAP Requirements

Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:

• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor

covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)

Page 45: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:

• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable

• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.

• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.

• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.

It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.

c. Notification Requirements

When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.

If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.

If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.

For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.

In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.

d. Abatement Requirements

Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:

Page 46: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is

occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in

the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal

activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final

asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.

• Meet all other current regulations and standards.

In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:

• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)

• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report

By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.

4. Summary and Conclusions

ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.

As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.

ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not

Page 47: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.

On the following charts, please find:

• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.

Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.

Page 48: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

Material #

Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location

(Refer to map in Appendix B)

1 Drywall White No 2,025 SF Throughout

2 Wall Panel Tan No 780 SF FS 1,2,5

3 Linoleum White w/ Paper Back Yes 95 SF FS 4

4 12x12 P/S Tan No 145 SF FS 3,4

5 12x12 Floor Tile No 21 SF FS 4,5

6 Mastic Brown No 21 SF FS 4,5

7 Carpet Underlayment Black No 125 SF FS 1

8 Hardwood Underlayment Black No 680 SF FS 1-5

9 Window Glaze White Yes 1 Unit FS 1

10 Caulk White No 15 LF Exterior House

11 Ceiling Tile Tan No 285 SF FS 3-5

12 Ceiling Panel Tan No 320 SF FS 1,2

13 Paper Insulation White Metallic No 115 SF FS 6

14 Blown in Insulation Tan No 680 SF Throughout House Ceiling

15 Asphalt Siding Green & White No 1,250 SF Exterior House

16 Fiber Board Tan & Black No 1,250 SF Exterior House

17 Roof Shingle Red & Tan No 820 SF Exterior House

18 Roof Shingle Dark Brown & Black

No 820 SF Exterior House

Page 49: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

5. Inspector’s Information

All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.

This report reviewed and submitted by:

Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220

Page 50: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDICES

Page 51: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX A

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS

Page 52: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 1 of 12

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To :

Attention :

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, MI 48174

Project Location :

John Kozuh

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198705 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614181 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/11/2017

614182 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/11/2017

614183 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/11/2017

614184 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/11/2017

614185 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/11/2017

614186 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/11/2017

614187 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/11/2017

614188 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/11/2017

614189 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/11/2017

614190 Asbestos Analysis04A 10/11/2017

614191 Asbestos Analysis04B 10/11/2017

614192 Asbestos Analysis04C 10/11/2017

614193 Asbestos Analysis05A 10/11/2017

614194 Asbestos Analysis05B 10/11/2017

614195 Asbestos Analysis05C 10/11/2017

614196 Asbestos Analysis06A 10/11/2017

614197 Asbestos Analysis06B 10/11/2017

614198 Asbestos Analysis06C 10/11/2017

614199 Asbestos Analysis07A 10/11/2017

614200 Asbestos Analysis07B 10/11/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 53: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 2 of 12

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198705 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614201 Asbestos Analysis07C 10/11/2017

614202 Asbestos Analysis08A 10/11/2017

614203 Asbestos Analysis08B 10/11/2017

614204 Asbestos Analysis08C 10/11/2017

614205 Asbestos Analysis09A 10/11/2017

614206 Asbestos Analysis09B 10/11/2017

614207 Asbestos Analysis09C 10/11/2017

614208 Asbestos Analysis10A 10/11/2017

614209 Asbestos Analysis10B 10/11/2017

614210 Asbestos Analysis10C 10/11/2017

614211 Asbestos Analysis11A 10/11/2017

614212 Asbestos Analysis11B 10/11/2017

614213 Asbestos Analysis11C 10/11/2017

614214 Asbestos Analysis12A 10/11/2017

614215 Asbestos Analysis12B 10/11/2017

614216 Asbestos Analysis12C 10/11/2017

614217 Asbestos Analysis13A 10/11/2017

614218 Asbestos Analysis13B 10/11/2017

614219 Asbestos Analysis13C 10/11/2017

614220 Asbestos Analysis14A 10/11/2017

614221 Asbestos Analysis14B 10/11/2017

614222 Asbestos Analysis14C 10/11/2017

614223 Asbestos Analysis15A 10/11/2017

614224 Asbestos Analysis15B 10/11/2017

614225 Asbestos Analysis15C 10/11/2017

614226 Asbestos Analysis16A 10/11/2017

614227 Asbestos Analysis16B 10/11/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 54: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 3 of 12

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198705 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614228 Asbestos Analysis16C 10/11/2017

614229 Asbestos Analysis17A 10/11/2017

614230 Asbestos Analysis17B 10/11/2017

614231 Asbestos Analysis17C 10/11/2017

614232 Asbestos Analysis18A 10/11/2017

614233 Asbestos Analysis18B 10/11/2017

614234 Asbestos Analysis18C 10/11/2017

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 55: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 4 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614181

01A95% Other5% CelluloseWhiteDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614182

01B99% Other1% CelluloseWhiteDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614183

01C99% Other1% CelluloseWhiteDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614184

02A1% Other99% CelluloseTanWall Panel

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614185

02B1% Other99% CelluloseTanWall Panel

Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614186

02C2% Other98% CelluloseTanWall Panel

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 56: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 5 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

40% Chrysotile614187

03A50% Other10% CelluloseTan/BlackLinoleum

Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Layer-1 Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614187

03A100% Other GreyMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Layer-2 Analyst: Sarah Poirier

614188

03B Not Analyzed

FS4

Layer-1 Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614188

03B99% Other1% CelluloseGreyMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Layer-2 Analyst: Sarah Poirier

614189

03C Not Analyzed

FS4

Layer-1 Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614189

03C100% Other GreyMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Layer-2 Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614190

04A99% Other1% CelluloseTan12x12 Peel and Stick

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614191

04B99% Other1% CelluloseTan12x12 Peel and Stick

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 57: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 6 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614192

04C100% Other Tan12x12 Peel and Stick

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614193

05A95% Other5% CelluloseTan12x12 Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4 Undersink

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614194

05B97% Other3% CelluloseTan12x12 Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614195

05C97% Other3% CelluloseTan12x12 Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5 Closet

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614196

06A99% Other1% CelluloseBrownMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614197

06B100% Other BrownMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614198

06C100% Other BrownMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 58: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 7 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614199

07A40% Other60% CelluloseBlackCarpet Underlay

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614200

07B30% Other70% CelluloseBlackCarpet Underlay

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614201

07C30% Other70% CelluloseBlackCarpet Underlay

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614202

08A10% Other90% CelluloseBlackHardwood Underlay

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614203

08B5% Other95% CelluloseBlackHardwood Underlay

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614204

08C10% Other90% CelluloseBlackHardwood Underlay

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

3% Chrysotile614205

09A96% Other1% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 59: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 8 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

614206

09B Not Analyzed

FS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

614207

09C Not Analyzed

FS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614208

10A99% Other1% CelluloseWhiteCaulk

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614209

10B100% Other WhiteCaulk

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614210

10C100% Other WhiteCaulk

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614211

11A4% Other96% CelluloseTanCeiling Tile

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614212

11B3% Other97% CelluloseTanCeiling Tile

Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 60: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 9 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614213

11C3% Other97% CelluloseTanCeiling Tile

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614214

12A1% Other99% CelluloseTanCeiling Panel

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614215

12B1% Other99% CelluloseTanCeiling Panel

Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614216

12C2% Other98% CelluloseTanCeiling Panel

Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614217

13A50% Other50% CelluloseWhitePaper Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614218

13B55% Other45% CelluloseWhitePaper Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614219

13C50% Other50% CelluloseWhitePaper Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 61: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 10 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614220

14A10% Other90% CelluloseTanBlown-in Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614221

14B5% Other95% CelluloseTanBlown-in Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614222

14C5% Other95% CelluloseTanBlown-in Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614223

15A98% Other2% CelluloseGreen/WhiteAsphalt Siding

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614224

15B98% Other2% CelluloseGreen/WhiteAsphalt Siding

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614225

15C99% Other1% CelluloseGreen/WhiteAsphalt Siding

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614226

16A10% Other90% CelluloseTan/BlackFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 62: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 11 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614227

16B10% Other90% CelluloseTan/BlackFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614228

16C10% Other90% CelluloseTan/BlackFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614229

17A85% Other15% FiberglassRed/TanRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614230

17B90% Other10% FiberglassRed/TanRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614231

17C85% Other15% FiberglassRed/TanRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614232

18A70% Other30% CelluloseBrown/BlackRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

None Detected614233

18B60% Other40% CelluloseBrown/BlackRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 63: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 12 of 12

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198705

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614234

18C60% Other40% CelluloseBrown/BlackRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Analyst: Sarah Poirier

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 64: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 65: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 66: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 67: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 68: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX B

SITE MAP

Page 69: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1520 Pagel Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198705

1st floor

N

FS 1

FS 2

FS 3

FS 4

FS 5

FS 6

Exterior 7

01A

01B

01C

02A

02B

02C

03A 03B

03C

04A

04B

04C 05A

05B

05C

06A

06B

06C

07A

07B

07C

08A

08B

08C

09A

09B

09C

10A

10B

10C

11A

11B

11C

12A

12B

12C

13A

13B

13C

14A

14B

14C

15A

15C

16A

16B

16C

17A

17B

18A

18B

15B

17C

18C

Page 70: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX C

STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF

INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH

Page 71: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 72: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 73: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:

1933 Moran Ave. Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Prepared for:

City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd.

Lincoln Park, MI 48146 313-386-1817

Prepared By:

ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600

10/1/2017

ETC Job #: 198704

Page 74: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) Introduction

2) Information about Asbestos Inspections

a) Sampling Procedures

b) PLM Analysis Methodology

c) Interpretation of Inspection Results

3) Regulatory Requirements

a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements

b) NESHAPs Requirements

c) Notification Requirements

d) Abatement Requirements

4) Summary and Conclusions

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

5) Inspector’s Information/Certification

Appendices

Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results

Appendix B – Site Map

Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish

Page 75: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1. Introduction

City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/1/2017.

The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.

ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.

Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.

Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.

2. Information about Asbestos Inspections

a. Sampling Procedures

Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:

• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)

It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the

Page 76: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.

Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).

b. PLM Analysis Methodology

PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).

Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.

According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.

c. Interpretation of Inspection Results

A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).

A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.

Page 77: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

3. Regulatory Requirements

There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.

a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations

The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:

• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination

facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or

more).

Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.

In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.

b. NESHAP Requirements

Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:

• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor

covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)

Page 78: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:

• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable

• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.

• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.

• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.

It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.

c. Notification Requirements

When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.

If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.

If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.

For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.

In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.

d. Abatement Requirements

Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:

Page 79: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is

occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in

the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal

activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final

asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.

• Meet all other current regulations and standards.

In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:

• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)

• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report

By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.

4. Summary and Conclusions

ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.

As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.

ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not

Page 80: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.

On the following charts, please find:

• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.

Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.

Page 81: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

Material # Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location

(Refer to map in Appendix B)

1 Pipe Wrap, white Yes 28 LF Rooms 10 & 12

2 Drywall with Mud & Tape, white No 2980 SF Throughout House

3 Floor Tile, 9X9, with paper backing, tan with glitter

No 145 SF Rooms 6 & 7

4 Floor Tile, 9X9, tan with glitter

Yes 680 SF Rooms 10 & 12

5 Mastic, black No 680 SF Rooms 10 & 12

6 Floor Tile, 12X12, brown flower pattern

No 185 SF Rooms 6, 7 & 9

7 Peel N’ Stick, 12X12, beige/tan No 50 SF Rooms 5 & 10

8 Peel N’ Stick, 12X12, wood grain

No 265 SF Rooms 2-4

9 Floor Underlay, black No 45 SF Room 5

10 House Wrap, black No 1900 SF Ext. House

11 Chimney Mortar, grey No 20 SF Rooms 8 & 11

12 Wire Insulation, black No 320 LF Throughout House

13 Foundation Cement, grey No 828 SF Basement

14 Stack Cement, white Yes 5 SF Room 12

15 Paper Stack Insulation, white Yes 5 LF Room 12

16 Window Glaze, white Yes 10 Units All Windows/ First Floor

17 Window Glaze, yellow No 5 Units All Windows-Basement

18 Ext. Caulk, white Yes 200 LF Ext. House

19 Attic Insulation, brown No 828 SF Attic

20 Transite Siding, white Yes 1900 SF Ext. House

21 Fiberboard , black/tan No 640 SF Ext. Garage

22 House Wrap, tan/silver No 1900 SF Ext. House

23 Vapor Barrier, tan No 828 SF Throughout 1st floor

24 Roof Shingles, grey No 1400 SF Ext. House/ Ext. Garage

25 Ice Shield, black No 1400 SF Ext. House/ Ext. Garage

26 Rood Shingle, black/grey No 900 SF Ext. House

Page 82: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

5. Inspector’s Information

All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.

This report reviewed and submitted by:

Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220

Page 83: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDICES

Page 84: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX A

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS

Page 85: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 1 of 19

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To :

Attention :

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, MI 48174

Project Location :

John Kozuh

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

REVISED REPORT

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198704 ETC Job :

10/12/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614245 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/12/2017

614246 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/12/2017

614247 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/12/2017

614248 Asbestos Analysis15A 10/12/2017

614249 Asbestos Analysis15B 10/12/2017

614250 Asbestos Analysis15C 10/12/2017

614251 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/12/2017

614252 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/12/2017

614253 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/12/2017

614254 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/12/2017

614255 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/12/2017

614256 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/12/2017

614257 Asbestos Analysis04A 10/12/2017

614258 Asbestos Analysis04B 10/12/2017

614259 Asbestos Analysis04C 10/12/2017

614260 Asbestos Analysis05A 10/12/2017

614261 Asbestos Analysis05B 10/12/2017

614262 Asbestos Analysis05C 10/12/2017

614263 Asbestos Analysis06A 10/12/2017

614264 Asbestos Analysis06B 10/12/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 86: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 2 of 19

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198704 ETC Job :

10/12/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614265 Asbestos Analysis06C 10/12/2017

614266 Asbestos Analysis07A 10/12/2017

614267 Asbestos Analysis07B 10/12/2017

614268 Asbestos Analysis07C 10/12/2017

614269 Asbestos Analysis08A 10/12/2017

614270 Asbestos Analysis08B 10/12/2017

614271 Asbestos Analysis08C 10/12/2017

614272 Asbestos Analysis09A 10/12/2017

614273 Asbestos Analysis09B 10/12/2017

614274 Asbestos Analysis09C 10/12/2017

614275 Asbestos Analysis10A 10/12/2017

614276 Asbestos Analysis10B 10/12/2017

614277 Asbestos Analysis10C 10/12/2017

614278 Asbestos Analysis11A 10/12/2017

614279 Asbestos Analysis11B 10/12/2017

614280 Asbestos Analysis11C 10/12/2017

614281 Asbestos Analysis12A 10/12/2017

614282 Asbestos Analysis12B 10/12/2017

614283 Asbestos Analysis12C 10/12/2017

614284 Asbestos Analysis13A 10/12/2017

614285 Asbestos Analysis13B 10/12/2017

614286 Asbestos Analysis13C 10/12/2017

614287 Asbestos Analysis14A 10/12/2017

614288 Asbestos Analysis14B 10/12/2017

614289 Asbestos Analysis14C 10/12/2017

614290 Asbestos Analysis16A 10/12/2017

614291 Asbestos Analysis16B 10/12/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 87: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 3 of 19

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198704 ETC Job :

10/12/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614292 Asbestos Analysis16C 10/12/2017

614293 Asbestos Analysis17A 10/12/2017

614294 Asbestos Analysis17B 10/12/2017

614295 Asbestos Analysis17C 10/12/2017

614296 Asbestos Analysis18A 10/12/2017

614297 Asbestos Analysis18B 10/12/2017

614298 Asbestos Analysis18C 10/12/2017

614299 Asbestos Analysis19A 10/12/2017

614300 Asbestos Analysis19B 10/12/2017

614301 Asbestos Analysis19C 10/12/2017

614302 Asbestos Analysis20A 10/12/2017

614303 Asbestos Analysis20B 10/12/2017

614304 Asbestos Analysis20C 10/12/2017

614305 Asbestos Analysis21A 10/12/2017

614306 Asbestos Analysis21B 10/12/2017

614307 Asbestos Analysis21C 10/12/2017

614308 Asbestos Analysis22A 10/12/2017

614309 Asbestos Analysis22B 10/12/2017

614310 Asbestos Analysis22C 10/12/2017

614311 Asbestos Analysis23A 10/12/2017

614312 Asbestos Analysis23B 10/12/2017

614313 Asbestos Analysis23C 10/12/2017

614314 Asbestos Analysis24A 10/12/2017

614315 Asbestos Analysis24B 10/12/2017

614316 Asbestos Analysis24C 10/12/2017

614317 Asbestos Analysis25A 10/12/2017

614318 Asbestos Analysis25B 10/12/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 88: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 4 of 19

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198704 ETC Job :

10/12/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614319 Asbestos Analysis25C 10/12/2017

614320 Asbestos Analysis26A 10/12/2017

614321 Asbestos Analysis26B 10/12/2017

614322 Asbestos Analysis26C 10/12/2017

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 89: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 5 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

40% Chrysotile614245

01A10% Other50% CelluloseWhitePipe Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614246

01B Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614247

01C Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

65% Chrysotile614248

15A 35% CelluloseWhitePaper Stack Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614249

15B Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614250

15C Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 90: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 6 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614251

02A80% Other20% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614251

02A90% Other10% Other fibrousGrey/TanMud

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614251

02A35% Other65% CelluloseTanTape

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614252

02B85% Other15% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614252

02B85% Other5% Cellulose

10% Other fibrous

Grey/WhiteMud

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614252

02B45% Other55% CelluloseGreyTape

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 91: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 7 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614253

02C80% Other20% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614253

02C97% Other3% CelluloseGreyMud

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614253

02C40% Other60% CelluloseGreyTape

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614254

03A97% Other3% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glitter)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614254

03A91% Other9% CelluloseBlack/TanMastic/Glue

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614255

03B97% Other3% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glitter)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS7

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614255

03B90% Other10% CelluloseBlack/TanMastic/Glue

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS7

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 92: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 8 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614256

03C96% Other4% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glitter)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS7

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614256

03C90% Other10% CelluloseBlack/TanMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS7

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

2% Chrysotile614257

04A95% Other3% CelluloseTan9x9 Floor Tile (Glutter)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614258

04B Not Analyzed

FS11

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614259

04C Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614260

05A94% Other6% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614261

05B93% Other7% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS11

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 93: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 9 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614262

05C90% Other10% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614263

06A98% Other2% CelluloseBrown12x12 Floor Tile (Flower)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614264

06B99% Other1% CelluloseBrown12x12 Floor Tile (Flower)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS7

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614265

06C100% Other Brown12x12 Floor Tile (Flower)

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614266

07A98% Other2% CelluloseBeige/Tan12x12 Peel/Stick

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

PC None Detected614266

07A92% Other8% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 94: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 10 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614267

07B99% Other1% CelluloseBeige/TanLinoleum

Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

PC None Detected614267

07B98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic

Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614268

07C99% Other1% CelluloseBeige/TanLinoleum

Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614268

07C98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614269

08A99% Other1% CelluloseWood Grain12x12 Peel/Stick

Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614269

08A99% Other1% CelluloseGrey/BlackMastic

Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 95: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 11 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614270

08B98% Other2% CelluloseTan/Orange12x12 Peel/Stick

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614270

08B98% Other2% CelluloseGrey/BlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614271

08C97% Other3% CelluloseTan/Orange12x12 Peel/Stick

Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614271

08C99% Other1% CelluloseGreyMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS4

Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614272

09A90% Other10% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614273

09B90% Other10% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614274

09C85% Other15% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment

Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 96: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 12 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614275

10A25% Other75% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614276

10B30% Other70% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614277

10C20% Other80% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614278

11A99% Other1% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614279

11B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614280

11C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614281

12A85% Other15% CelluloseBlackWire Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 97: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 13 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614282

12B80% Other20% CelluloseBlackWire Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614283

12C75% Other25% CelluloseBlackWire Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614284

13A100% Other GreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614285

13B100% Other GreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS11

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614286

13C99% Other1% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

2% Chrysotile614287

14A96% Other2% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614288

14B Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 98: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 14 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

614289

14C Not Analyzed

FS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

2% Chrysotile614290

16A96% Other2% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614291

16B Not Analyzed

FS3

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614292

16C Not Analyzed

FS5

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614293

17A94% Other6% CelluloseYellowWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614294

17B98% Other2% CelluloseYellowWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614295

17C99% Other1% CelluloseYellowWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS12

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 99: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 15 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

4% Chrysotile614296

18A96% Other WhiteExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614297

18B Not Analyzed

Ext House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614298

18C Not Analyzed

Ext House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614299

19A2% Other98% CelluloseBrownAttic Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614300

19B5% Other95% CelluloseBrownAttic Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614301

19C5% Other95% CelluloseBrownAttic Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: OJ Ivey

12% Chrysotile614302

20A83% Other5% CelluloseGreyTransite Siding

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 100: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 16 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

614303

20B Not Analyzed

Ext House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

614304

20C Not Analyzed

Ext House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614305

21A10% Other90% CelluloseBlack/TanFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614306

21B15% Other85% CelluloseBlack/TanFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614307

21C20% Other80% CelluloseBlack/TanFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614308

22A10% Other90% CelluloseTan/SilverHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614309

22B5% Other95% CelluloseTan/SilverHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 101: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 17 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614310

22C2% Other98% CelluloseTan/SilverHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614311

23A3% Other97% CelluloseTanVapor Barrier

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614312

23B2% Other98% CelluloseTanVapor Barrier

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614313

23C10% Other90% CelluloseTanVapor Barrier

Fibrous

HomogenousFS7

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614314

24A85% Other15% Mineral woolGreyRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614315

24B90% Other10% Mineral woolGreyRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614316

24C85% Other15% Mineral woolGreyRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 102: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 18 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614317

25A3% Other97% CelluloseBlackIce Shield

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614318

25B5% Other95% CelluloseBlackIce Shield

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614319

25C5% Other95% CelluloseBlackIce Shield

Fibrous

HomogenousExt Garage

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614320

26A94% Other6% Mineral woolBlack/GreyRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614321

26B95% Other5% FiberglassBlack/GreyRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

None Detected614322

26C90% Other10% Mineral woolBlack/GreyRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: OJ Ivey

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Analyst: OJ Ivey

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 103: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 19 of 19

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

1933 Moran Ave, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198704

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/01/2017

10/12/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 104: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com

Page 105: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 106: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 107: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 108: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 109: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 110: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX B

SITE MAP

Page 111: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

CL

1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198704

House Exterior 14

N

FS 1

FS 2 FS 3

FS 4 FS 5 FS 6

FS 7

FS 8

02A

02B

02C 03A

03B

03C 06A 06B

06C

07A

08A 08B

08C

09ABC

10A

10B

10C

11ABC

16A 16B

16C

18A

18B

18C

19A

19B

19C

20A

20B

20C

22A

22B

22C

23A

23B

23C

24A

24B 25A

25B 26A

26B

26C

CL

CL

CL

CL

1st floor

FS 9

Page 112: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198704

FS 10

FS 11

FS 12

01A

01B

01C

04A

04B

04C

05A

05B

05C

07B

07C

12A

12B

12C

13A

13B

13C 14ABC

15ABC

17A

17B

17C

FS 9

Basement

N

Page 113: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1933 Moran Ave., Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198704

21A

21B

21C

24C

25C

Garage

Garage 13

N

Page 114: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX C

STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF

INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH

Page 115: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 116: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 117: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

NESHAP RENOVATION / DEMOLITION INSPECTION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:

762 Ford Blvd. Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Prepared for:

City of Lincoln Park 1355 Southfield Rd.

Lincoln Park, MI 48146 313-386-1817

Prepared By:

ETC - Environmental Services 38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174 (734) 955-6600

10/01/2017

ETC Job #: 198703

Page 118: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) Introduction

2) Information about Asbestos Inspections

a) Sampling Procedures

b) PLM Analysis Methodology

c) Interpretation of Inspection Results

3) Regulatory Requirements

a) MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Requirements

b) NESHAPs Requirements

c) Notification Requirements

d) Abatement Requirements

4) Summary and Conclusions

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

5) Inspector’s Information/Certification

Appendices

Appendix A - Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Results

Appendix B – Site Map

Appendix C - State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate or Demolish

Page 119: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

1. Introduction

City of Lincoln Park contracted ETC - Environmental Services (ETC) to perform a renovation / demolition inspection of the building located at 762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146. This inspection was conducted on 10/01/2017.

The EPA under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) asbestos rule requires that prior to the start of a renovation and/or demolition project, the building must be inspected for asbestos containing materials (ACM’s). The purpose of this inspection was to determine the presence and quantity of friable or potentially friable ACM’s. Depending on the ACM found and the condition that it is in, removal of the material may be necessary before demolition work is to begin. Prior to the start of a demolition project, it is necessary that friable or potentially friable ACM’s be removed.

ETC's certified inspector, Alan Hill, conducted the ACBM Inspection and identified materials suspected of containing asbestos. Alan Hill’s State of Michigan Asbestos Building Inspector’s certification number is A-50220.

Wherever potential asbestos materials were found, data was collected and recorded regarding quantities and observed conditions of the suspect material. As required by the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), three (3) samples of each type of material were taken in different locations to determine actual asbestos content.

Included along with this report are copies of the bulk sample results, a site map showing sample locations and a copy of the State of Michigan Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish. This information will be necessary for the asbestos abatement contractor selected to perform asbestos abatement activities in the house. ETC has included its information on the second page.

2. Information about Asbestos Inspections

a. Sampling Procedures

Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were randomly collected within each building area. The materials sampled were broken down into distinct homogenous (similar) materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:

• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.) • Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system etc.) • Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)

It is important to note that some companies are only taking one sample of select non-friable materials. While this procedure is allowed under the NESHAPs regulation, the OSHA standard suggests a minimum of three samples of each homogeneous material. This is a better approach due the potential errors in the

Page 120: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

analytical method used. To provide the most accurate information possible and be sure of our results, ETC chooses to take three samples of each sampled material.

Additionally, some inspection companies have taken to assuming that materials contain asbestos rather than paying for the time and expenses of sampling them. This is not if the clients best interest. If materials are being assumed to contain asbestos, the client must treat them as asbestos containing even if they are not. This can lead to significantly increased costs for the building owner. In general, ETC only assumes materials to be asbestos when sampling them will ruin their integrity (i.e. fire doors) or when they are too dangerous to sample (i.e. live electrical lines).

b. PLM Analysis Methodology

PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).

Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.

According to NESHAP requirements any bulk sample that has asbestos content above 0% but below 10% should be point counted for final determination of percentage. Please note, the contract DID NOT include point counting as defined in NESHAP. Should City of Lincoln Park wish to have this additional analysis conducted, ETC can send any samples in this range for point counting. However, this will require additional charges for analysis. Therefore, for any samples in the range above 0% but below 10% these results can only be considered estimates.

c. Interpretation of Inspection Results

A material is considered by OSHA, the EPA and the State of Michigan to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogenous material has asbestos fibers present in a concentration greater than one percent (>1 %).

A summary of the materials sampled, asbestos content, quantities and locations can be found on the Chart A in Section 4.0 – Summary and Conclusions.

Page 121: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

3. Regulatory Requirements

There are two main regulations that affect renovation / demolition of residential homes and asbestos materials. The MIOSHA asbestos construction standard has requirements to protect the workers performing the renovation / demolition while the EPA – NESHAPs regulation has requirements that protect the general public and environment.

a. MIOSHA Construction Asbestos Regulations

The MIOSHA standard establishes a permissible exposure limit (PEL) average over an 8 hour day. This means that this is the maximum level of asbestos that workers and/or employees can be exposed to without respirator protection and protective clothing. Should air sampling during renovation or demolition activities be at or near the PEL the employer will have to:

• Notify Workers • Worker Training • Post Danger Signs • Establish periodic air monitoring regulated areas, and decontamination

facilities • Provide respiratory protection and personnel protective clothing • Employee Respiration Monitoring • Record keeping • Medical Surveillance (if employee will be exposed 30 days per year or

more).

Until recently, only schools were federally mandated to conduct asbestos inspections of their buildings. However, with the passage of new MIOSHA regulations, all building owners (in this case City of Lincoln Park) is now required to notify all renovation / demolition workers of presence, location and quantity of all asbestos containing building materials within the building.

In most cases, it is more practical to have an asbestos contractor removal the ACM from the building prior to renovation / demolition than have the renovation / demolition contractor comply with all these requirements.

b. NESHAP Requirements

Prior to beginning a renovation or demolition project, NESHAP (enforced in Michigan by the Department of Environmental Quality – MDEQ) requires a full inspection of the following materials to determine their asbestos content:

• Friable Materials • Category 1 – Non-friable Materials (Packings, gaskets, resilient floor

covering, and asphalt roofing products) • Category II – Non-friable Materials (All other non-friable materials)

Page 122: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

In general, MDEQ requires any identified asbestos materials to be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities that would dislodge, disturb or otherwise affect these materials. There is an exception that if a licensed supervisor will state in writing that the material will not become friable during the renovation / demolition process it may be left in the building. However, be very careful with this exemption. MDEQ has stated that they believe that the only materials that MIGHT qualify for this exemption would be roofing felt and asphalt roofing materials. In order to use even this small exemption, the following would be required from the demolition contractor:

• A licensed asbestos abatement supervisor will sign that the material will not become friable

• The supervisor will have to be on-site during all renovation or demolition to insure that material stays intact.

• If MDEQ reviews that site and finds the material crumbled or disturbed both the contractor and building owner may be cited up to $27500 per day.

• The waste generated from the activity must be taken to an asbestos dump and they must be informed that the waste is mixed asbestos waste.

It is obviously very expensive and difficult to try and leave ACM within and area / building during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, ETC recommends that all ACM be removed. This is why ETC does not assume materials to be ACM.

c. Notification Requirements

When performing abatement work within the State of Michigan, notification requirements depend on the quantity of materials and the friability of the material being removed.

If removing friable material above >160 square feet and / or 260 linear feet, the contractor must provide a ten working day notification to Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and a ten calendar day notification to Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) – Asbestos Program. If only non-friable materials are being removed, MDEQ does not want a notification.

If removing above >15 square feet but < 160 square feet, or > 10 linear feet but < 260 linear feet the contractor only needs to notify the LARA as stated above.

For removals of < 15 square feet or < 10 linear feet, no notification is required.

In conjunction with any notification to LARA, the contractor must pay a 1% fee for the project. This fee is to reflect 1% of the total abatement contract amount.

d. Abatement Requirements

Any company hired to remove identified ACM must insure that all asbestos companies, supervisors, workers are be licensed by the LARA. Additionally, these companies must insure that:

Page 123: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

• The State of Michigan must be notified of the work in advance • An asbestos supervisor must be on-site at all times when work is

occurring • All work must be completed within regulated work areas • All work must be completed utilizing asbestos work practices defined in

the MIOSHA regulations • Have on-site personnel sampling conducted during the removal

activities • The contractor must request and pass (below 0.05 f/cc) a final

asbestos clearance performed by a neutral third party prior to dismantling and leaving the site.

• Meet all other current regulations and standards.

In addition to these requirements, ETC strongly recommends that City of Lincoln Park insure that they receive the following documents from the contractor prior to making final payment:

• Written / signed documentation from the supervisor if any asbestos materials are to be left in place during renovation or demolition (Not recommended)

• Copy of the asbestos abatement notification • Copy of the personnel monitoring during the work • Copy of the final asbestos clearance report

By requiring these documents, City of Lincoln Park will substantially reduce their liability should something occur during the asbestos removal at this site.

4. Summary and Conclusions

ETC has endeavored to identify potential asbestos containing materials (ACM) that were accessible (without destructive testing) at the time of the inspection, other potential ACM may be buried or inaccessible at the time of the initial survey.

As has been evidenced on numerous other demolition and renovation projects, when tearing out or demolishing existing building surfaces, it is very common to encounter other building materials that were not accessible during the initial testing for ACM or lead / cadmium painted surfaces. It is therefore incumbent on City of Lincoln Park or their selected construction / renovation contractor to refer to the chart of sampled materials consistently during the renovation process. If materials are encountered during this process that are not clearly identifiable on the initial survey chart, ETC should be called to test and verify the asbestos / lead / cadmium content of these items.

ETC cannot be held responsible for materials encountered after the initial survey is completed unless we are contacted and given the opportunity to test and verify the material content. The costs associated with this additional testing are not

Page 124: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

included within the scope of this project and will incur additional charges for the additional sampling and analysis.

On the following charts, please find:

• Chart A - Is a summary of the materials that were sampled. Materials that test positive for asbestos have been bolded to make identification easier. If additional materials are encountered that were not previously identified, the contractor is responsible to contact ETC and have these materials tested. These additional sampling costs are not included in the scope of work or price for this survey.

Quantities that are listed are estimates only; in general, listed quantities represent only what was visible during testing. It is likely that where ACM has been identified throughout specific floors, similar materials and quantities exist on other like floors. It is the contractors’/client’s responsibility to verify all amounts of asbestos identified during any bid process, or during future renovation and/or demolition activities. Materials that are identical in both relative location and physical description to already tested materials listed in this report should always be assumed to be ACM.

Page 125: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Chart A – Materials Sampled and Asbestos Content

Material #

Material Description Asbestos Quantity Location

(Refer to map in Appendix B)

1 Plaster Over Drywall, White No 4,350 SF Throughout

2 Duct Wrap, White YES 655 SF Basement

3 Wire Insulation, White w/ Green Specs

No 20 LF FS 3

4 Blow-In Insulation, White No 1,092 SF Throughout

5 Chimney Mortar, Gray No 15 SF FS 2

6 Stack Cement, White No 5 SF FS 9

7 Window Glazing, White YES 7 Units All Windows

8 Foundation Cement, Gray No 800 SF Throughout Basement

9 Floor Underlayment, Black No 750 SF FS 1,2,3,4,12,13

10 Floor Tile, 9x9, Brown YES 88 SF FS 8 & 11

11 Mastic, Black No 88 SF FS 8 & 11

12 Linoleum, Green Cobble No 125 SF FS 6 & 8

13 Mastic, Tan No 125 SF FS 6 & 8

14 12x12, Peel & Stick, Gray Lattice No 125 SF FS 6

15 Floor Tile, 9x9, Green No 115 SF FS 6

16 Linoleum, Black w/ Multi-Color No 95 SF FS 2

17 Transite Siding, Gray YES 1,400 SF Exterior House

18 House Wrap, Black No 1,400 SF Exterior House

19 Fiberboard, Brown No 1,400 SF Exterior House

20 Roof Shingles, Black No 1,250 SF Exterior House

Page 126: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

5. Inspector’s Information

All inspection work was completed by a Michigan certified asbestos abatement inspector as detailed below.

This report reviewed and submitted by:

Alan Hill State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Building Inspector State of Michigan Card #: A-50220

Page 127: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDICES

Page 128: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX A

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULT FORMS

Page 129: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 1 of 14

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive, Suite 200 Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To :

Attention :

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Romulus, MI 48174

Project Location :

John Kozuh

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198703 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614110 Asbestos Analysis01A 10/11/2017

614111 Asbestos Analysis01B 10/11/2017

614112 Asbestos Analysis01C 10/11/2017

614113 Asbestos Analysis01D 10/11/2017

614114 Asbestos Analysis01E 10/11/2017

614115 Asbestos Analysis02A 10/11/2017

614116 Asbestos Analysis02B 10/11/2017

614117 Asbestos Analysis02C 10/11/2017

614118 Asbestos Analysis03A 10/11/2017

614119 Asbestos Analysis03B 10/11/2017

614120 Asbestos Analysis03C 10/11/2017

614121 Asbestos Analysis04A 10/11/2017

614122 Asbestos Analysis04B 10/11/2017

614123 Asbestos Analysis04C 10/11/2017

614124 Asbestos Analysis05A 10/11/2017

614125 Asbestos Analysis05B 10/11/2017

614126 Asbestos Analysis05C 10/11/2017

614127 Asbestos Analysis06A 10/11/2017

614128 Asbestos Analysis06B 10/11/2017

614129 Asbestos Analysis06C 10/11/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 130: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 2 of 14

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198703 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614130 Asbestos Analysis07A 10/11/2017

614131 Asbestos Analysis07B 10/11/2017

614132 Asbestos Analysis07C 10/11/2017

614133 Asbestos Analysis08A 10/11/2017

614134 Asbestos Analysis08B 10/11/2017

614135 Asbestos Analysis08C 10/11/2017

614136 Asbestos Analysis09A 10/11/2017

614137 Asbestos Analysis09B 10/11/2017

614138 Asbestos Analysis09C 10/11/2017

614139 Asbestos Analysis10A 10/11/2017

614140 Asbestos Analysis10B 10/11/2017

614141 Asbestos Analysis10C 10/11/2017

614142 Asbestos Analysis11A 10/11/2017

614143 Asbestos Analysis11B 10/11/2017

614144 Asbestos Analysis11C 10/11/2017

614145 Asbestos Analysis12A 10/11/2017

614146 Asbestos Analysis12B 10/11/2017

614147 Asbestos Analysis12C 10/11/2017

614148 Asbestos Analysis13A 10/11/2017

614149 Asbestos Analysis13B 10/11/2017

614150 Asbestos Analysis13C 10/11/2017

614151 Asbestos Analysis14A 10/11/2017

614152 Asbestos Analysis14B 10/11/2017

614153 Asbestos Analysis14C 10/11/2017

614154 Asbestos Analysis15A 10/11/2017

614155 Asbestos Analysis15B 10/11/2017

614156 Asbestos Analysis15C 10/11/2017

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 131: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 3 of 14

Login # Sample ID Work Requested Completed

198703 ETC Job :

10/11/2017Report Date :

Client Project : 20014199

614157 Asbestos Analysis16A 10/11/2017

614158 Asbestos Analysis16B 10/11/2017

614159 Asbestos Analysis16C 10/11/2017

614160 Asbestos Analysis17A 10/11/2017

614161 Asbestos Analysis17B 10/11/2017

614162 Asbestos Analysis17C 10/11/2017

614163 Asbestos Analysis18A 10/11/2017

614164 Asbestos Analysis18B 10/11/2017

614165 Asbestos Analysis18C 10/11/2017

614166 Asbestos Analysis19A 10/11/2017

614167 Asbestos Analysis19B 10/11/2017

614168 Asbestos Analysis19C 10/11/2017

614169 Asbestos Analysis20A 10/11/2017

614170 Asbestos Analysis20B 10/11/2017

614171 Asbestos Analysis20C 10/11/2017

Reviewed by:

Quality Assurance Coordinator

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product

certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged,

confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended

recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 132: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 4 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614110

01A98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614110

01A97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteSkim

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614110

01A95% Other5% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614111

01B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614111

01B97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteSkim

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614111

01B95% Other5% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 133: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 5 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614112

01C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614112

01C98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteSkim

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614112

01C97% Other3% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS5

Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614113

01D98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614113

01D97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteSkim

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614113

01D97% Other3% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 134: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 6 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614114

01E98% Other2% CelluloseGreyPlaster

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS13

Layer-1 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614114

01E98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteSkim

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS13

Layer-2 Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614114

01E95% Other5% CelluloseGreyDrywall

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS13

Layer-3 Analyst: Scott Larabell

25% Chrysotile614115

02A60% Other15% CelluloseWhiteDuct Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

614116

02B Not Analyzed

FS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

614117

02C Not Analyzed

FS10

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614118

03A20% Other80% CelluloseWhiteWire Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 135: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 7 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614119

03B25% Other75% CelluloseWhiteWire Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614120

03C25% Other75% CelluloseWhiteWire Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614121

04A28% Other2% Cellulose

50% Mineral wool

20% Fiberglass

WhiteBlown Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614122

04B17% Other3% Cellulose

60% Mineral wool

20% Fiberglass

WhiteBlown Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS1

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614123

04C8% Other2% Cellulose

75% Mineral wool

15% Fiberglass

WhiteBlown Insulation

Fibrous

HomogenousFS13

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614124

05A98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614125

05B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 136: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 8 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614126

05C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyChimney Mortar

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614127

06A98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614128

06B98% Other2% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614129

06C97% Other3% CelluloseWhiteStack Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

2% Chrysotile614130

07A95% Other3% CelluloseWhiteWindow Glaze

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

614131

07B Not Analyzed

FS1

Analyst: Scott Larabell

614132

07C Not Analyzed

FS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 137: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 9 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614133

08A98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614134

08B98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS9

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614135

08C98% Other2% CelluloseGreyFoundation Cement

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS10

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614136

09A20% Other80% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment

Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614137

09B25% Other75% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment

Fibrous

HomogenousFS3

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614138

09C25% Other75% CelluloseBlackFloor Underlayment

Fibrous

HomogenousFS13

Analyst: Scott Larabell

2% Chrysotile614139

10A96% Other2% CelluloseBrown9x9 Floor Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS11

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 138: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 10 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

614140

10B Not Analyzed

FS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

614141

10C Not Analyzed

FS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614142

11A97% Other3% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS11

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614143

11B98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614144

11C98% Other2% CelluloseBlackMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614145

12A98% Other2% CelluloseGreen CobbleLinoleum

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614146

12B97% Other3% CelluloseGreen CobbleLinoleum

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 139: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 11 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614147

12C97% Other3% CelluloseGreen CobbleLinoleum

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614148

13A98% Other2% CelluloseTanMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614149

13B98% Other2% CelluloseTanMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614150

13C98% Other2% CelluloseTanMastic

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS8

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614151

14A97% Other3% CelluloseGrey12x12 Peel/Stick

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614152

14B98% Other2% CelluloseGrey12x12 Peel/Stick

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614153

14C98% Other2% CelluloseGrey12x12 Peel/Stick

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 140: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 12 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614154

15A97% Other3% CelluloseGreen9x9 Floor Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614155

15B97% Other3% CelluloseGreen9x9 Floor Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614156

15C97% Other3% CelluloseGreen9x9 Floor Tile

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS6

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614157

16A40% Other60% CelluloseBlack/Multi-ColorLinoleum

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614158

16B35% Other65% CelluloseBlack/Multi-ColorLinoleum

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614159

16C40% Other60% CelluloseBlack/Multi-ColorLinoleum

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousFS2

Analyst: Scott Larabell

25% Chrysotile614160

17A60% Other15% CelluloseGreyTransite Siding

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 141: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 13 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

614161

17B Not Analyzed

Ext House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

614162

17C Not Analyzed

Ext House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614163

18A20% Other80% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614164

18B40% Other60% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614165

18C35% Other65% CelluloseBlackHouse Wrap

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614166

19A20% Other80% CelluloseBrownFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614167

19B25% Other75% CelluloseBrownFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 142: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

Page 14 of 14

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Romulus,MI 48174

Environmental Testing And Consulting Inc.

38900 Huron River Drive

Vacant Residence

762 Ford Blvd, Lincoln Park, MI 48146

ETC Job :

Client Project :

198703

20014199

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.38900 Huron River Drive,

Suite 200, Romulus, Michigan 48174,

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

10/06/2017

10/11/2017

10/06/2017

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Date Analyzed :

None Detected614168

19C25% Other75% CelluloseBrownFiber Board

Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614169

20A95% Other5% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614170

20B97% Other3% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

None Detected614171

20C95% Other5% CelluloseBlackRoof Shingle

Non-Fibrous

HomogenousExt House

Analyst: Scott Larabell

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Analyst: Scott Larabell

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL,

Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or

resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission

electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the

responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is

considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are

related to only to samples that were tested.

Page 143: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com

Page 144: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 145: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 146: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 147: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 148: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 149: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX B

SITE MAP

Page 150: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

01D

CL

762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198703

FS 1 FS 2

FS 3

FS 4

FS 5

FS 6

01A

01B

01C

03ABC

04A

04B

05ABC

07A

07B 07C

09A

09B

12AB

13AB

14ABC

15ABC

16ABC

17A

17B

17C

18A

18B

18C

19A

19B

19C

20A

20B

20C

FS 7 FS 8

1st floor

N

Page 151: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

01E

762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198703

2nd floor

FS 12

FS 13

04C

09C

FS 7

N

Page 152: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

762 Ford Blvd., Lincoln Park, MI 48146

Please Note: This is a rough floor plan

only. All items, (doorways, Windows,

etc.) may not be included in this illus-

tration. Also, room and component

sizes are not drawn to scale.

City of Lincoln Park

198703

FS 9

FS 10

FS 11

02A

02B

02C

06A

06B

06C

08A

08B

08C

10AB

10C

11AB

11C

12C 13C

FS 8

Basement

N

Page 153: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied

APPENDIX C

STATE OF MICHIGAN NOTIFICATION OF

INTENT TO REMOVE/DEMOLISH

Page 154: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied
Page 155: Contract Documents may be obtained from the MITN website ...87310170-B96F-4822... · The bidder shall be held to have compared the premises with the specifications and to have satisfied