contract compliance: shifting the paradigm from quantitative to qualitative analysis assistant...
TRANSCRIPT
CONTRACT COMPLIANCE: SHIFTING THE PARADIGM FROM QUANTITATIVE TO QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Assistant Commissioner Tim FlynnMinnesota Department of Human Rights
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 2
Old Paradigm
Historically, the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) has taken only a quantitative approach in determining compliance.
• MDHR reviewed construction reports and reported minority and female labor hours versus total labor hours
• MDHR reviewed Affirmative Action Plans for inclusion rates in various fields versus the latest census demographic information
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 3
Old Paradigm
• MDHR focused little time in analyzing how much time contractors were spending working with youth, schools, post-secondary schools, and training programs to create a pipeline of new employees.
• MDHR spent little time analyzing the efforts of contractors to retain and promote diverse employees.
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 4
Changing the Paradigm
If MDHR took a more qualitative approach to its compliance efforts, it would routinely gather rich data that could be analyzed by stakeholders to improve:
• employment opportunities,
• education planning, and
• workforce training planning.
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 5
Changing the Paradigm
MDHR can change the paradigm by simply enforcing current statues and communicating its intention to do so.
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 6
Minnesota Law & Good Faith Efforts
Minnesota law allows MDHR to consider Contractors’:
• Efforts in after-school programs, work-study jobs, summer jobs and summer work study programs.
• Efforts to work with community agencies, community leaders, secondary schools, technical colleges, junior colleges and colleges.
• Active participation in community events such as “job fairs” especially when they empower their representatives with the authority to make on-the-spot commitments.
(Minn. Admin. Rule 5000.3440-3480)
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 7
New Paradigm
MDHR has begun to change its focus concerning good faith efforts and focus more toward a qualitative analysis that evaluates the actions of the contractor in working with schools, training programs and community groups to create a more viable pipeline of employees.
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 8
New Paradigm: Certificate of Compliance
2013 statute change makes Certificates of Compliance good for 4 years instead of 2 years. With this change, MDHR is:
• Streamlining its review of initial Affirmative Action Plan reviews
• Initiating an in-depth review of Annual Reports:• Over time, are contractor’s effectively implementing
their plans when they hire, promote and/or terminate employees
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 9
New Paradigm: Construction Reports
Pre-Construction Good Faith Efforts Work Plan:
• Due with Pre-Construction Packet when contractor receives notice award
• Due prior to the beginning of construction work
• Detailed plan for the prime contractor and each subcontractor
• Detailed estimate of minority & female labor hours for prime contractor and each subcontractor
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 10
New Paradigm: Construction Reports
• Details the contractor’s efforts to work with:• Business & Construction Trade Councils and
Construction Trade Unions
• Community Construction Job Training Organizations
• Educational Institutions
• Philanthropic community
December 5, 2013
Minnesota Department of Human Rights 11
The Goal
• Help to create jobs and reduce unemployment through efforts that specifically target people of color and women.
• Help ensure that the construction industry is able to find sufficiently trained workers within the Minnesota labor force.
December 5, 2013