constituents of highway runoff - archive

212
TE 66? .A3 no. FHW.A- RD- 81 -044 No. FHWA/RD-81/044 ISTITUENTS OF HIGHWAY RUNOFF Vol. III. Predictive Procedure for Determining Pollutant Characteristics in Highway Runoff February 1981 Final Report 2JJS&S* J ^rfsot ,k Document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Prepared for FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Offices of Research & Development Environmental Division Washington, D.C. 20590

Upload: others

Post on 05-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

TE66?.A3no.FHW.A-RD-81 -044

No. FHWA/RD-81/044

ISTITUENTS OF HIGHWAY RUNOFF

Vol. III. Predictive Procedure for Determining Pollutant

Characteristics in Highway Runoff

February 1981

Final Report

2JJS&S*

J^rfsot,k

Document is available to the public through

the National Technical Information Service,

Springfield, Virginia 22161

Prepared for

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

Offices of Research & Development

Environmental Division

Washington, D.C. 20590

Page 2: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

FOREWORD

This report is composed of six volumes: Volume 1documents the con-

It tuents of highway stormwater runoff and their pollut.ona effects;

Volume it contains detailed procedures for conducting a monitor mg

and analysis program for highway runoff pollutant data; Volume 111

describes a simple predictive procedure for estimating runoff quant.

t

Y

and auality from highway systems; Volume IV is the research report

discuss no re Srch approach and findings; Volume V conta.ns the com-

parers manual forP

a highway runoff data borage program and

Solume VI is an executive summary. The report will be of mterest to

planners designers and researchers involved in evaluation of h ghway

stormwater runoff contributions to nonpoint sources of water pollut.on.

Research in Water Quality Changed due to Highway Operations is included

in the Federally Coordinated Program of Highway Research and Develop-

I !/t«L * of Proiect 3E, "Reduction of Environmental Hazards to

Water ResourceslueTthe^ ghway System". Mr. Byron N. Lord is the

Project and Task Manager.

Sufficient copies of the report are being distributed to provide a

minimum of one copy to each FHWA Regional office. Division o ice and

State highway agency. Direct distribut.on .s being made to the

Di vi sion offices

.

-}oV Charles F. Scheffey

Director, Office of Research

Federal Highway Administration

NOTICE

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship. of the Department

of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The

United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or

use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the views of the

contractor, who is responsible for the accuracy of the data pre-

sented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official

views or policy of the Department of Transportation. This report

does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers,

Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein only because they are

considered essential to the object of this document.

Page 3: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Technical Report Documentation Page

1. Report No.

FHWA/RD-81/044

2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catolog No.

4. Title and Subtitle

Constituents of Highway Runoff

Volume III, Predictive Procedure for Determining

Pollution Characteristics in Highway

Runoff

5. Report Dote

February 19816. Performing Organization Code

7. Author's) Kobriger> N . p., Meinholz, T. L.,Gupta, M. K. , and Agnew, R. W.

8. Performing Organization Report No.

9. Performing Organization Name and Address

Envirex Inc., (A Rexnord Company)

Environmental Sciences Division

5103 West Beloit Road

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53214

DEPAB1TRANSPORT

10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)

~f-CPs3|3E3-01

4

1 1 .-1Contxact or Grant No.

dOT^Ffi-1 1-8600

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

Federal Highway Administration

Office of Research and Development

U.S. Department of Transportation

Washington. D.C. 20590

jnuJ3. Typejjof Report and Period Covered

^Inal Report - Volume III

February 1975 - July 1978

LIBRAR14. Sponsoring Agency Code

15. Supplementary Notes

FHWA Contract Manager: Byron N. Lord.(HRS-42)

16. Abstract

This report documents the development and application of a simple predictive

procedure (model) for determining the runoff quantity and quality from highway

systems based on the data gathered from 5 monitoring sites around the country.

Equations for 3 highway site types were developed to predict runoff volume and

pollutant wash-off coefficients for 17 water quality parameters based on total

rain, rainfall duration and dry days. Analysis indicated that pollutant accumu-

lation rates within highway systems can be best predicted using average daily

traffic values.

The titles of the volumes of this report are:

FHWA-RD-

81/042

81/04381/044

81/045

81/046

81/047

SubtitleVol. I

Vol. II

Vol. Ml

Vol. IV

Vol. V

Vol. VI

State-of-the-Art ReportProcedural Manual for Monitoring of Highway Runoff

Predictive Procedure for Determining Pollutant

Characteristics in Highway Runoff

Characteristics of Runoff from Operating Highways,

Research ReportHighway Runoff Data Storage Program and Computer

User's ManualExecutive Summary

17. Key Words

Highway runoffWater pol lution

Envi ronment

SaltingUrban storm water

Water qual i tyRunoffWater qual i tyModel ing

18. Distribution Statement

This document is available to the

public through the National Technical

Information Service, Springfield,

Virginia 22161

19. Security Classif. (of this report)

Unclassified

20. Security Classif. (of this page)

Unclassified

21. No. of Poges

205

22. Price

~orm DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized

Page 4: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

IUctl 1V1

ff5

I I Hill llhss

- I o• - *

3 • <» •-. • >wd ©»•>«- © AC

fi it i ill!

\ illii III!< i

</>f S E E J I-eI 2

3£8 ** Vrt

i i i*

Hi nllii

o •>» r »ON- -J

ill

S-88 n

S 2

~ * « * y u;ttt|2

E - - - E E

rS-yii'8;

_or»

?:.

.o•

os

« -§•J—

'

• —ft

o .•a oM

o .

o -

-8i

b. O • . ooo •

I

•1

<

«/» UII llll llll llll

u

llll llll

01

llll llll

61

llll llll

81

1

llllillll

11

llll llll

91

llll llll

91

llll llll

M

llll llll

CI

llll llll

11

llll llll

11

llll llll

01

llll llll

s

llll llll

f

llll

1

llll llllillll

9

llll llll

9

llll llll

»

llll llll

C

llll llll

I

llll llll

\

llll

MO

llll

oTIT TIT I'M ITI TIT TIT |T T|T

1 inches

s

iImu

ii

I

S g e J Ve*e1 2

III!

i - • Ip8 t Is

UII i!

« B • • • 9• e e n e *

ill Hliillilll

«ggooomdd *

«IMa.

XIM

1 I

S!a

jf!

fief* 2 2 5 » »"

£ - " E 8 8 ill ail • I

Illli ill1

Iliiiitil i»

i«n VfcVi 8£ fl* uaslW

3gz

I

1is£ in

c-'

|S

!'i?

is

t*. to

->!

la

• •s

£ 8

I I

Page 5: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table of Contents

Page number

Documentation Page i

Metric Conversion Factors ii

Tables of Contents ii"1

Tables iv

Figures vil

SECTIONS

I Introduction 1

II Predictive Procedure Development 3

III Input Requirements and Output Format 50

IV Predictive Procedure Results 61

V Receiving Water Impact 88

VI Conclusions and Recommendations 93

VII References 95

VIM Glossary 97

Append? es 99A. Rainfall - Runoff Data 99B. Washoff Variable (K

2 ) Sensitivity 115

C. Model Listing 119

D. Model Input Format 13*t

E. Model Variables and Description 136

F. Receiving Water Impact Sampling 139

G. Model Results 1^6

H. Flow, Total Rain and Dry Days Scallergram For 193

Type II Si tes

111

Page 6: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

TABLES

Number Page

1 Site characteristics, rainfall - runoff summary. k

2 Predicted Q/R ratios for various rainfall volumes. 7

3 Dry day calculations for DD and DDI using a

hypothetical rainfall record. 8

k Results of regression analyses using DD andDDI values for Type I! sites. 10

5 Correlation analysis results for rainfall -

runoff durations. 12

6 Rainfall-runoff duration equations. Ik

7 General equations relating rainfall and runoffdurations. 13

8 Example of rainfall record and monitoring dataneeded to develop Kj using Method I. 19

9 Total solids per runoff rate by rainfall cate-gory at the Milwaukee, I-792

* site, 1976. 21

10 Total solids washoff using method 2 at theMilwaukee, I -794 site, 1976, 22

11 K^ values for monitoring sites. 2k

12 Predictive procedure K, values. 25

13 Published K1values. 26

"ik Comparison of total solids accumulation rates

to site characteristics. 27

15 Regression analysis results for K-| (dependentvariable), and ADT and dustfall for (independentvariable). 27

16 K2 sensitivity at Milwaukee l-79*». 31

17 Range of K2 values for each monitoring site. 31

TV

Page 7: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

TABLES (continued)

Number Page

18 K2 values used in predictive procedure. 40

19 Constituent equations developed for Type I andType I I I sites. 41

20 Constituent equations developed for Type II sites. 42

21 Predicted constituent loads using site specificequations and average equations. 44

22 Constituent equations developed for Type II sites. 45

23 Milwaukee 1-794 calculated suspended solids andlead loadings using Type I site equations. 47

24 Milwaukee Hwy. 45 calcualted suspended solidsand lead loadings using Type II site equations. 48

25 Nashville 1-40 calculated suspended solids andlead loadings using Type II site equations. 49

26 Nonwinter rainfall summaries for a hypotheticalarea. 54

27 Model results for Milwaukee 1-794, 1976 and 1977. 62

28 Model results for Milwaukee Hwy. 45, 1976 and 1977- 28

29 Model results for Nashville I-40, 1977. 73

30 Model results for Harrisburg I -81, 1976 and 1977- 77

31 Model results for Denver I -25, 1976 and 1977. 80

32 Model results for Texas 1-45, 1977. 84

33 Summary of highway runoff quality data for all

six monitoring sites - nonwinter 1976-77. ^9

34 Yearly highway runoff loads. 88

35 Average concentrations for combined sewer, stormsewer and highway discharges. 91

Page 8: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

TABLES (continued)

Number Page

36 Annual loads for highway, municipal and urban 92runoff sources - lb/ac-yr.

Page 9: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

FIGURES

Number Page

Estimation of pollutant level after build-up. 18

Surface total solids level, Milwaukee 1-794. 20

Selected total solids accumulation rates versusaverage daily traffic. 29

Milwaukee 1-794 K2

sensitivity, 1976. 32

Milwaukee 1-794 K2

selection, 1976. 33

Milwaukee 1-794 K£

selection, 1977- 34

Milwaukee Hwy. 45 K2

selection, 1977- 35

Milwaukee Hwy. 45 selection, 1977. 36

Harrisburg K2

selection, 1976. 37

Harrisburg K2 selection, 1977. 38

Nashville K2

selection, 1977. 39

Typical paved area cross-sections. 51

Predictive procedure flow diagram. 56

Measured versus computed total solids at

Milwaukee I -794, 1976 and 1977- 65

Measured versus computed lead at Milwaukee1-794, 1976 and 1977- 66

Measured versus computed total solids at

Milwaukee Hwy. 45, 1976 and 1977. 70

Measured versus computed lead at MilwaukeeHwy. 45, 1976 and 1977- 71

Measured versus computed total solids at

Nashville 1-40, 1977. 75

Measured versus computed lead at Nashville1-40, 1977. 76

VI i

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Page 10: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

FIGURES (continued)

Number Page

20 Measured versus computed total solids atHarrisburg 1-81, 1976 and 1977. 78

21 Measured versus computed lead at Harrisburg1-81, 1976 and 1977- 79

22 Measured versus computed total solids at

Denver 1-25, 1976 and 1977. 81

23 Measured versus computed lead at Denver I -25,1976 and 1977. 32

2k Measured versus computed total solids at

Dallas I -45, 1977. 85

25 Measured versus computed lead at Dallas I -45,

1977. 86

VI 11

Page 11: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Acknowledgement is given to numerous State highway and U.S. GeologicalSurvey representatives as well as individual experts who provided assistanceduring the progress of the study and preparation of the final report. Itis not possible to name all who participated in this research study andtherefore only a few key agencies and persons are listed below.

The following State highway agencies provided technical assistance, sitesfor field investigations, traffic and maintenance data:

Colorado State Department of HighwaysLouisiana Department of Transportation and DevelopmentPennsylvania Department of TransportationTennessee Department of TransportationWisconsin Department of Transportation

District offices of the U.S. Geological Survey in Colorado, Pennsylvania,Tennessee and Wisconsin provided technical assistance in equipmentinstallation and site operation.

Review and assistance in the preparation of the final reports was providedby: Richard Howell, California Department of Transportation andRoderick Moe, Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation.

In addition to those agencies and individuals acknowledged above, sincereappreciation is expressed for the work of Frank K. Stovicek, (deceased)

,

FHWA, Office of Research who thoroughly reviewed the final report.

ix

Page 12: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive
Page 13: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

The following report describes the development of a predictiveprocedure for determining the quantity and quality of storm generatedrunoff from highway areas. The development of the procedure is basedupon the monitoring program carried out in 1976 and 1977 at sitesin Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Nashville, Tennessee;and Denver, Colorado. Complete details of the monitoring programs atthese sites can be found in Volume IV of this document series (1).

Data summaries and monitoring results related to the development of thepredictive procedure are presented in the Appendices of this report.(See Table of Contents).

PURPOSE

The purpose of the predictive procedure is to provide highway designersand other interested individuals or agencies with a simplified tool to

estimate the quantity and quality of storm generated highway runoff.The predictive procedure is comprised of a series of equations whichcan be computerized to form a math model. The procedure is made up

of four components corresponding to the following functions:

Rainfal 1- runoff

Pol 1 utant bui ldup

Pollutant wash-offConstituent loadings

The predictive procedure can be used for Environmental Impact Statements(EIS) or to determine the loadings for analysis of the pollutantdischarge effects of various design storms at a particular site. Thepredictive procedure is not meant to be an all-inclusive model whichpredicts hydrographs and concentrations versus time but rather an easyto use method of determining the total volume of runoff and totalpounds of a pollutant discharged from a highway area. The highwayarea under consideration is defined as the paved roadway and total

nonpaved area which contributes to a particular discharge point. Thestandard data available to highway designers such as average dailytraffic, site length, percent paved and curb type are used to defineeach area of investigation.

In addition to EIS applications, the procedure can also be used to

evaluate existing highway systems. Thus, the effects of increased

traffic, changes in the curb or barrier configuration or modifications

to the nonpaved area can be determined as they relate to the total

pollutant loading. Design storm analyses can also be conducted on an

existing highway drainage area using the predictive procedure. The

pollutant loadings, as predicted for these storms, can then be used to

evaluate different water quality impacts through mass balance ormodeling analyses. In this manner, the pounds of a pollutant dischargedfrom a highway drainage area can be compared to other pollutant sources

1

Page 14: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

within the area. Model use for evaluating receiving water impacts

is discussed in Section V of this report.

FORM OF THE PREDICTIVE PROCEDURE

The predictive procedure presented in the following portions of this

report will be available to the user in two separate forms. Becauseof the requirement of being easy to use, the first form of the

procedure is presented as a series of equations and tables with a

detailed step-by-step list of instructions for implementation. Theseequations require the user to select a number of coefficientscorresponding to particular site characteristics and to select a

rainfall period for analysis. Directions on the selection ofcoefficients and examples of the various applications are included.

The second form of the predictive procedure is a computerized versionfor use in long term applications which require the analysis ofextended rainfall periods. Here the procedure takes on the form ofa simulation model which performs the calculations based upon the usersupplying the appropriate input data. Again, suitable documentationis included with the model. Further descriptions of the input require-

ments for each form of the model are presented in Section III. A

listing of the computer program statements is contained in the Appendi-

ces of this report.

Page 15: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION II

PREDICTIVE PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT

The development of the functional relationships between the individualsets of data from the monitoring program comprise the framework forthe predictive procedure. The modules of the procedure represent thebuild-up of pollutants on the right-of-way surfaces, the wash-off ofthese pollutants during runoff and the determination of the dischargeloads for selected pollutant constituents. Although the pollutantbuild-up process occurs prior to the rainfall-runoff process, thelatter is discussed first in order to evaluate the length of time in

which the pollutant accumulation actually occurs and to determine theamount of material remaining on the right-of-way after the previousrainfall event. The period of buildup and washoff from previousstorms are collectively referred to as the prestorm history throughoutthis report.

RAINFALL-RUNOFF RELATIONSHIPS

The volume and duration of runoff from highway right-of-way are cal-culated within this module of the predictive procedure. The averagerunoff rate (volume of runoff per hour) is then used to remove(wash-off) a portion of the pollutants that have accumulated duringthe prestorm history. The prediction of the average runoff rate is

based upon the characteristics of the highway drainage area and therainfall volume and duration of each event under analysis.

The rainfall volume (R) for each storm and the associated runoffvolume (Q_) when expressed in the same units, provide a means of

calculating the runoff coefficient which can be written as;

runoff coefficient = volume of runoff = Q/R ratiovolume of rain

The runoff coefficient or Q/R ratio as used in this report, relates

the total volume of runoff from both the paved and nonpaved portionsof the drainage area to the amount of rain causing the runoff. Ap-pendix Tables A-1 - A-5 on pages 99- 1 1 A present the rainfall andrunoff data from the monitoring sites. Table 1 presents a summary of

the monitoring site characteristics, rainfall data, and runoff data.

These data used to develop the predictive procedure are only for

the nonwinter months, April through October. Runoff during the win-ter months, November through March, is difficult to characterize,especially in the northern climates where snowfall and frozen groundconditions are prevalent. Runoff during the winter months in theseareas is a function of snowfall, snowpack and temperature.

Page 16: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

As can be seen from Table 1, some of the Q/R ratios are greater than

1.0, which indicates that the amount of runoff from these sites is

greater than the rainfall that falls on the drainage area. Thisphenomenon is, of course, impossible unless an external source offlow is contributing to the monitoring site. The logical explanationfor these large values is likely due to the accuracy of the instru-ments used for measuring the rainfall and flow volumes. A 10 to 15

percent error is enough to affect each OVR value at the all-pavedMilwaukee 1-794 site so that the ratios are greater than 1.0. Becausethe percent error can be positive or negative for each parameter, theQ/R values which are greater than 1.0 will remain in the analysessince the effects of these values will be negligible when averagedwith the remaining data.

Table 1. Site characteristics, rainfall - runoff s umma ry

,

3 3Drainage area, Percent Average Range

Site ^acres paved Q/R Q/R

100 0.87 0.20-1.21

31 0.40 0.10-0.91

27 0.49 0.02-1.09

37 0.48 0.10-0.90

37 0.42 0.08-0.68

a. April through Octobermetric units: acres x 0,405 = hg

in. x 2.54 = cm

The site characteristic referred to as percent paved in Table 1 is

a measure of that part of the drainage area which is normally concreteor asphalt. The driving lanes and most shoulder areas, as well as

exit and entrance ramps that are part of the total drainage area areconsidered paved. Since the predictive procedure is meant to beapplied to all highway areas which may or may not have characteristicsthe same as those listed in Table 1, a general site characteristicsclassification was developed.

Mi lwaukee1-794 2.1

Mi lwaukeeHwy . 45 106.0

Harrisburg1-81 18.5

Nashvi 1 le

1-40 55.6

Denver1-25 35.3

Page 17: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

The Milwaukee 1-79** site is unique in that the elevated bridge deckthat comprises this drainage area is completely paved with impactbarriers containing each set of lanes. This type of site is charac-teristic of many urban freeway systems which have a number of bridgedecks passing over interchanges or depressed areas.

The Milwaukee Hwy kS site, the Nashville \-k0 site, and the Denver 1-25

site characterize those highway drainage areas which contain pavedroadway and shoulder areas and grassy or nonpervious side areas. Thesesites also contain mountable curbs with inlets spaced along the road-way surface. The percent of the drainage area that is paved generallyranges from 30 to kO percent.

The final type of drainage area that can be encountered is the rural,flush shoulder type of highway which is characterized by the Harris-burg l-8l site. This site has flush shoulders which receive the runofffrom the paved traffic lanes and which conveys the runoff to inletsspaced along the grassy side ditches of this rural site. Generallythis type of site has a smaller part of the drainage area that is pavedranging from 20 to 30 percent.

These general site characteristics will be classified as follows for

all remaining predictive procedure applications:

Type 1 sites: Urban, elevated bridge deck, 100 percent pavedwith impact barriers containing each set of

lanes; Milwaukee 1-79**.

Type II sites: Mountable curb with paved and nonpaveddrainaqe area; Milwaukee Hwy. k5, Nashville1-40, Denver 1-25.

Type III sites: Rural sites with flush shoulders, paved andnon-paved runoff through ditches; Harrisburq1-81.

The predictive procedure calculates the volume of runoff for a

given rainfall event using equations which were developed for eachsite type from the monitorina data at the five drainage areas listed

in Table 1. Using this table, the 1-79** site had an average Q/R ratioof 0.87 which means that for each inch (2.5** cm) of rain that fell on

that site, an average of 0.87 inches (2.2 cm) of runoff were measuredat the outlet of the drainage area. Similarly for the Nashville 1-40

site, 0.48 inches (1.22 cm) would be discharged. The differencesin these values can be accounted for by the site characteristics of

each drainage area with the \-k0 site being 37 percent paved and 1-79**

being 100 percent paved.

The range of Q/R values presented in Table 1 varies from 0.02 to 1.2.

The variation in these ratios between sites is caused by the differ-

ences in rainfall intensities and durations and most s iqni f icantly

Page 18: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

the differences in the characteristics of the drainage areas such as

percent paved and soil cover within the unpaved area. The variationsin the ratio at a particular site are related to four possiblesources:

1. Rainfall intensity and duration.2. Prestorm history.

3. Monitoring instrumentation.h. Variation in vehicular splash-off.

Two rainfalls at a particular site may have the same volume but occurover s iani f icantly longer durations which effects the amount of

runoff. For example, one inch (2.5^ cm) in 30 minutes should producemore runoff than one inch (2.5^ cm) in 5 hours due to the latterstorm having more opportunity to infiltrate the nonpervious portionsof the drainaae area.

The prestorm history relates the conditions of the drainage area priorto the storm under consideration. Thus, the 5 hour storm abovewould Droduce more runoff if it had been preceeded by a large amountof rain a day earlier than if there were no rain for an extendedperiod prior to the storm. The prestorm history is thus related to

the soil moisture conditions of the nonnaved portions of the drainaaearea and their ability to provide a base for infiltration of a part

of the potential runoff volume.

The prestorm history of the all-paved 1-79^ site has little effecton the runoff volumes. Although the surface storage or surfacewetting component can effect the volume of runoff as a function of theprestorm history, it will be considered constant for each event at

this site (Type 1) and not included in the analysis.

Another source of variation in the Q/R ratios could be attributableto the accuracv of the monitorinn instrumentation. Small rainfalland flow volumes can approach the detectable limits of the raingaugesand stage recorders used at the monitoring sites. This may causea variation of as much as 20 percent. These variations must be

regarded as implicit to the data collection effort and will be assumedto be relatively constant for the events monitored in this project.

A final source of variation in Q/R ratios may be due to variationsin vehicular splash-off. Splash-off varies with the velocity (speed)

and quantity of traffic. Generally, the traffic volume and velocityare highest during daylight hours and lowest at night. Thereforea storm occurring during daylight hours will probably produce less

runoff (more splash-off) than the same storm occurring at night. In

urban areas, traffic volume is greatest during the early morning andlate afternoon (commuter traffic) while traffic velocity is oftenlowest at the peak of the "rush-hour". A storm which occurs justprior to or immediately following peak "rush-hour" traffic wouldprobably produce less runoff (more splash-off) than the storm occurring

6

Page 19: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

at other times of the day. The effect of splash-off on Q/R ratio

is probably greatest for Type I and Type II sites.

Determination of Runoff Volumes

Tvpe I Sites - Two approaches were initially investigated for pre-

dicting the volume of runoff from the Milwaukee 1-79^ site. The

first approach used an average Q/R ratio of 0.87 (Table 1 ) as a

coefficient which when multiplied times the rainfall volume produced

the volume of runoff. Thus, an equation of the following form was

produced:

Q = 0.87 R

where Q = runoff volume

R = rainfal 1 volume

This form of the equation is similar to the rational formula approach

which predicts that a constant fraction of the rainfall is converted

into runoff for all rainfall events. The data from thissite showed

the volume of runoff to vary from storm to storm as previously

mentioned. In order to account for this variation, the runoff volumes

were correlated to the rainfall volumes using simple regression

techniques. The resulting equation, significant at the 95 percent

confidence limits, was:

Q= 0.969 R " 0.019 0)where Q_ = runoff volume (inches)

R = rainfall volume (inches)

The correlation coefficient for this equation was 0.95 with an R 2 value

of 0.91 which indicates that 91 percent of the variation in thetotal

runoff at this site can be attributed to total rain using equation 1.

Other forms of the equation using nonlinear techniques produced less

significant relationships. Equation 1 produced runoff volumes and

Q/R ratios which vary with the volume of rainfall as listed in Table 2.

This form of the equation is used in the predictive procedure for all

Type 1 sites.

Table 2. Predicted Q/R ratios for various rainfall volumes.

Rainfall - R

(inches) 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0

Predicted Runoff-Q(inches) 0.078 0.175 0.466 0.950 1.92

Q/R 0.78 0.78 0.93 0.95 0.96

metric units: in. x 2.5^ = cm

7

Page 20: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Type II Si tes - Type II sites are characterized as those sites with both

paved and non paved (pervious) areas. Because of these pervious areas,dry days are an essential parameter in evaluating the relationshipbetween rainfall and runoff volumes. Long dry periods prior to a rain-

fall will allow the non paved portions of the drainage area to absorbmore of the rainfall than conditions where rainfall has been recent

or significant enough to saturate those areas. Thus, long dry periodsgenerally reduce runoff volume and lower the runoff coefficient (Q/R

ratio)

.

Two methods of quantifying the prestorm history were attempted in thedevelopment of the predictive procedure. The first method was to

count the number of days of dry weather prior to the event underconsideration. This "dry days" (DD) value is a measure of the lengthof time prior to the event when no rain fell on the drainage area. Thesecond method measures the number of days prior to the rainfall eventin which the cumulative amount of rainfall equaled one inch (DDI).

DDI takes into consideration the amount of rain that fell in the pre-storm period as well as the amount of time that was necessary to

accumulate one inch (2.5^ cm) of rain. Other volumes of rainfall wereconsidered but the one inch value accounted for more of the large rain-storms than smaller values, while larger cumulative values resulted in

extremely large DDI values for arid sites such as Denver. The two

methods of quantifying the prestorm period may be significantly differentin their estimates.

Table 3 presents a hypothetical rainfall record to illustrate the

difference in dry day estimates using the DD and DDI methods. If the

storm prior to the storm under consideration is greater than or equal

to one inch (2.5^ cm), DD and DDI have the same value (storm on April 3).

However, if rainfall events less than one inch (2.5*t cm) occur in the

rainfall record, the two values become significantly different (storms

on April 5,7,9 and 11). The cumulative value DDI provides an estimateof the length of time that was required to accumulate one inch ofrainfall prior to the event under analysis.

Table 3- Dry day calculations for DD andDDI using a hypothetical rainfall record.

Storm Rainfal 1

,

DD, DDI,

date in. days days

April 1 1.05 — —April 3 0.30 2 2

April 5 0.45 2 k

April 7 0.20 2 6

April 9 0.50 2 8

April 11 0.10 2 6

metric units: in. x 2.5^ = cm

8

Page 21: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Regression analyses were used to evaluate both methods of charac-terizing prestorm history (DD and DDl) for each of the three Type II

sites. The results of the regression analyses using both linear andlog transformed data are presented in Table k. All correlationcoefficients (R values) for the resulting equations are significantat the 95 percent confidence level when compared to a table of criticalvalues for correlation coefficients (2). The regression analyses alsoshow that equations using DD or DDl variables for individual sitesare not significantly different in explaining the data variance forrunoff volume (R2 values differ by less than 0.0*0. This indicatesthat equations using the DD variable will predict runoff volume aswell as equations utilizing the DDl variable. Because regressionanalyses indicate no advantage in using the DD or DDl variable, theDD variable was used for the predictive procedure since it is the commonway of relating prestorm conditions.

The log form of the equation using the DD variable was used for Type II

sites, because this form of the equation explains slightly more of thedata variation (R2 values) than does the linear form (Table k) . Also,the regression coefficient of the DD variable in the linear equationfor Milwaukee Hwy. *t5 site is a small positive value (0.001). Thisequation will predict larger runoff volumes as the number of dry daysincreases, which is counter to what is commonly expected in hydrology.

The form of the predictive equation to be used for Type II sites is

a combination of the Milwaukee Hwy. k$ and Denver sites as determinedthrough a multiple regression analysis. The Nashville data were notincluded in this task because the data from that site tended to skewthe resulting equation away from the high significance levels that

were obtained in the individual correlations. The Nashville data

could be highly correlated as is shown in Table k. However, when

these data were combined with data from the other two sites in one

regression analysis, the Nashville data were different than the other

sites and the resulting equation was unacceptable. Appendix H (page

193) presents a series of scatter diagrams (Figure H-l, H-2, H-3, W-k)

plotting flow versus total rainfall and dry days to show how the

Nashville data differs from the Milwaukee Hwy. k$ and Denver sites

and how the Nashville data tends to cluster. The reason for the

variance in the Nashville data can be explained by two factors. The

storm history for this site occurs such that a dry period of five to

ten days is followed by four or five rainfall events in a short period.

This same pattern is repeated two or three times as can be seen in the

monitoring data of Appendix Table A-3 on pages 106 to 108. Another

factor is the problem of rainfall measurement which was evident in

the early portions of the monitoring program. Because of the length

of the drainage area and since there was only one raingauge at this

site in the initial phase, there were instances where flow was

measured although rainfall was not recorded on the gauge. This could

Page 22: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 4. Results of regression analyses3 usingDD and DD1 values for Type II sites.

Mi lwaukee Hwy 45

DD

Denver 1-25

linear 0. = 0.746 R + 0.001 DD - 0.199 0.88 O.78log = 0.366 RK *3 DD - 06 0.9* 0.89

DDI

Ulog = 0.413 R 1 *^ DDI -0.007 0.94 0.89linear 0_ = 0. 768 R- 0.005 DDI : _0. 099 0.91 0.82

DDlinear Q = 0.509 R - 0.002 DD - 0.026 0.91 O.83log = 0.565 R 1 ' 34 DD -0.175 .91 0.83

DDI

lii

log = 0.713 R'* z:?H DDI -0.183 .89 0.80linear Q - 0.482 R - 0.002 DDI +0.033 0.92 0.84

= 0.713 R K25A DDI -0-183 0.89

Nashville 1-40

DD

linear Q « 0.557 R - 0.01 DD + 0.022 0.92 O.85log = 0.522 rI-028 dd -0.107 0.87 0.75

DDI'

linear Q = 0.555 R - Q.003 DDI + 0.019 0.91 O.83log - 0.592 R 1 * 02 DDI -0.109 0.87 0.76

a Al 1 equations are significant at the 95 percent confidence limits

Note : Q_ = runoff (inches)

R - rainfall volume (inches)

DD = dry days to last rain

DDI = cumulative days to one inch of rain

metric units: in. x 2.54 = cm

10

Page 23: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

account for the variability in the data. Further details of themonitoring aspects of this site can be found in Volume IV of thisdocument series (1).

Using rainfall volume (R) and dry day (DD) data for Milwaukee Hwy. hSand Denver, the Type II site equation to predict runoff volume (Oj

was developed:

The Type II site equation is further explained in Section I I I of thisreport and is significant at the 95 percent confidence limits (2).

Tyep I I I Sites - The Harrisburg 1-81 site was used to characterizeType III sites. Data were investigated in the same manner as Type II

sites with the results of the DD and DDI variables being the same asType II and the log equation showing more significance when comparedto the linear equation. Using rainfall volume (R) and dry day (DD)

data for Harrisburg, the Type III site equation to predict runoffvolume (Q) was developed using regression analysis:

»- 0,8* .'••*..-•» £3 ^The Type III site equation is further explained in Section I I I of thisreport and is significant at the 95 percent confidence limits (2).

Runoff Duration

Once the total volume of runoff has been calculated using site specificequations, the duration of this runoff must be predicted to determinethe average runoff rate. A total of one inch (2.5^ cm) of runoff mayoccur at a particular site over a duration of one hour to possiblysix hours. The average intensity of one inch (2.5^ cm) per hour

should wash off more pollutant than a one-sixth of an inch (0.^2 cm)

per hour event, assuming uniform rainfall intensity. The predictiveprocedure developed in this report requires an average runoff rate

to remove pollutants from the drainage area. Ideally, discrete rates

at individual points within the runoff event should be used to remove

the pollutants, however, this methodology is too sophisticated for

the purposes of this procedure.

Data for the duration of runoff at each monitoring site are presentedin Appendix A, Tables A-l to A-5. These data were used to developan equation relating rainfall duration (RD) to runoff (flow) duration

11

Page 24: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

(FD) . Each site's data were analyzed using linear regressionanalysis to determine an equation relating the durations. Table 5presents the resulting equations for each of the five sites, a com-

bination of the Type II sites, (Milwaukee Hwy. 45, Nashville andDenver) and all sites combined.

The equations of Table 5 are all significant at the 95 percent con-fidence level (2) and give a good indication of the typical durationof runoff for a given rainfall event. The last column of the tablepresents the predicted runoff duration for a two hour rainfall. Thesedata show that the shortest runoff duration is predicted for theMilwaukee 1-794 site (Type I site), while the longest runoff durationis predicted for the Harrisburg site (Type III site). Runoff dura-tions predicted for Milwaukee Hwy 45, Nashville and Denver (Type II

sites) are very similar and fall between the predicted values forMilwaukee 1-794 and Harrisburg. This would be expected consideringthe drainage (hydraulic) characteristics for these three site

types.

Table 5. Correlation analysis results for rainfall-runoff durations.

Correlation RunoffRunoff duration coefficient duration (FD)

Si te equation R for RD = 2 hrs

Milwaukee 1-794 FD = 1.12 RD + 0.69 0.95 2.93Mi lwaukee Hwy 45 FD = 1.50 RD + 1.31 0.91 4.31

Nashville 1-40 FD = 1.33 RD + 1.60 0.89 4.26

Denver 1-25 FD = 1.16 RD + 1.72 0.90 4.04Harrisburg 1

— 3

1

FD = 1.65 RD + 6.27 0.75 8.57Hwy 45, 1-40, FD = 1.36 RD + 1.63 0.90 4.35

1-25 combined

All sites combined FD = 1.62 RD + 2.10 0.77 5.34

Note: RD = rainfall duration in hoursFD = runoff duration in hours

The determination of the average runoff rate is critical to the

accuracy of the washoff equation of the predictive procedure, there-fore further investigation of the effects of prestorm history was

undertaken. The data of the Type II and III sites was analyzed to

determine if longer runoff durations were associated with fewer dry

days. This relation was thought to occur since the pervious (non-

paved) areas would contribute more to the total runoff volume as the

number of dry days decreased. Since these areas have significantlylonger time of concentrations than paved portions of the drainage area,

possibly runoff duration would increase for equal duration rainfalls.

12

Page 25: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

The analyses were run for two separate groups of data correspondingto a certain number of dry days thought to show a significantdifference in rainfall/runoff durations. The first dry day estimatesinvestigated were those events with dry day periods equal or greaterthan 5 days and those less than 5 days. Regression analyses wererun on each set of data for each site to determine if there were largedifferences in the ratios of the flow duration-to-runoff duration.The regression equations that resulted showed very little differencebetween each of the groups of data. The next analysis was to use thedry day period of 10 days to determine if any differences resulted.Regression analyses for these data showed greater differences than the5 day estimate and the resulting equations are presented in Table 6.All equations are significant at the 95 percent limits (2).

Table 6 presents the calculated runoff duration for a two hour rain-fall. The Harrisburg site shows the longest runoff duration forthis storm. The difference in the duration for DD greater than 10

and less than 10 is more than 3 hours. The Nashville site shows the

smallest difference between the DD estimates, but this characteristicmay be a function of the raingauge problems discussed earlier. Theseequations will be used to categorize the runoff duration for the sitetypes which contain nonpaved portions of the drainage area.

Table 7 shows the results of combining the three Type II sites whilethe Type I and III sites use the individual equations for the Milwaukeel~79*» and Harrisburg sites, respectively. The equations for the twodry day groups in Table 7 are identical for Type I sites because a

completely paved drainage area was assumed to be unaffected by pre-storm history.

Table "J. General equations relating rainfalland runoff durations.

Dry days greaterthan or equal to Dry days less than

Type of site 10 days 10 days

Type I FD = 1.12 RD + 0.69 FD = 1 . 12 RD + 0.69Type II FD = 1.06 RD + 1.79 FD = 1 .27 RD + 2. 16

Type Ml FD » 1.92 RD + 4. 18 FD = 1.48 RD + 8.28

Note: FD = runoff durationRD = rainfall duration

The duration of runoff predicted with these equations is used withthe previously calculated runoff volume to produce the average

13

Page 26: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

co•pftJ

3cr<u

co

L.

3

A3

C

<0or

vO

0)

-OJO

<U ~moi x: otD <D -M »— LTV CM vO OC 4J D» • • • •— — c X o> vO CN CM(0 t/> <Dl_ — 4Jo u-

C uM- o o CMM- — *4-

o M II

c TO -—

v

3 1- Q Qor 3 LL. or

c>--C

o o>» (/)

«- 0)Q —

C l-

M- O O N14- ._ «+_OW ||

C (0^-3 L. O Oor 3 u_ or

L.WOO> -M

"D <U — O>• (D 3U O o-QUO)

vOCO

LA

CO oCM

-3-

CM

o CMvO

-3"

en00CM

• • • •

CO *- — oo

+ + + +aOT

Qor

oor

oor

COo -a-m oo

-a-• • • •

•— T"" •— «*-

ll II II ll

oLl.

QLL.

QLL.

£3LL.

cr>

LA

or

vO

II

Q

o

CM

CM

+£3or

CMC7%

OII

o

LACM

CA

LTVOCM

+a

o

oII

Q

CMO00

oo

-a-

+oor

CMCA

II

Q

U)Q) <D l_

<D •— 3-* LA IM x»3 -3- .— u V)

n > o <U LA •— ^~^ x: -a-V) 1

> CMC 1

L. CO1_ |— IE ro — <u — (0 —

TL z o 3C

i/»

(/) i_

L. 0)

(/> 3 4->

1_ o <D

3 x EoX c II

C m•— c •

O Oc •—

»

m X•— 03•M L. w<u 3 4-L. •o3o »— • *

^* (/>

M- *D •MM- M- •Mi

C Cc •— 33 njL. L. <J

II IIL.

O Q 0)

LL. or E

# #

<u•Mo

14

Page 27: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

volume of runoff per hour for a given rainfall event.

POLLUTANT ACCUMULATION EQUATION

The pollutant accumulation equation of the predictive model is asfo 1 1 ows

:

P = P + (K, x HL x T) (2)o I

Where; P = pollutant level after build-up, lb (kg)

P = initial surface pollutant load, lb (kg)

K, = pollutant accumulation rate, lb/mi-day(kg/km-day)

T =* time of accumulation, days (20 day maximum)HL = highway length, mi (km)

The pollutant accumulation equation predicts the highway surfacepollutant load (P) which accumulates during a selected time period(T) at a specified rate (K.). Surface pollutants are those whichaccumulate on the surface of all-paved sites (e.g. elevated bridgesections) and on the paved and unpaved surfaces of highway sectionswhich have right-of-way areas (e.g. gravel shoulders, grassy areas,etc.). For purposes of the predictive model, pollutant load refersto that fraction of the total highway load which is available for

wash-off.

The monitoring data from this study were "end-of-the-pipe" wash-offdata which are not a direct measure of pollutant buildup. Therefore,monitoring data could not be used to establish whether pollutantbuildup on highways is linear, exponential or some other mathematicalfunction. The pollutant accumulation equation (2) assumes that

pollutants build up linearly during the accumulation period. Thisequation is similar to that used in the Storage, Treatment, Overflow,Runoff Model (STORM) (3) which is based on a linear pollutant build-up relationship developed from a study on urban runoff in Chicago (k) .

The surface pollutant accumulation variable, Kj , is the rate at whichthe carrier pollutant, total solids, accumulates in pounds per mileper day (kg/km/day). A carrier pollutant is that pollutant whichexhibits the highest degree of association with all other pollutantsbeing considered. In many mathematical models, the predicted quantityof carrier pollutant is used to estimate the quantity of all otherpollutants being modeled. This method eliminates the need for eachpollutant to be predicted separately by the model, greatly reducing

the number of calculations required. Total solids was chosen as the

carrier pollutant for the predictive model developed in this study

because total solids showed the highest correlation with the othermonitored quality parameters when regression analyses were performed.Volume IV, of this document series, "Characteristics of Runoff From

Operating Highways Research Report", presents the results of these

15

Page 28: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

regression analyses (1). In this report the term total solids (TS)

refers to total suspended solids (TSS) plus total dissolved solids(TDS). Under the new nomenclature of Standard Methods (5), totalsolids as used in this study is defined as total residue.

Highway planners usually know in advance the length of the highway andthe design average daily traffic. For this reason, K^ , is expressedas pounds per mile - day (kg/km-day) . The unit, miles, refers tothe actual length of highway section in the contributing drainage area.This is in contrast to curb mile or lane mile, which is a multiple ofthe highway length. The highway designer then inputs to the modelthe highway length (HL) and the appropriate Ki factor. K] is sitespecific and its value may be based upon actual monitoring data, if it

exists, or its value can be estimated from average daily traffic. K,

selection based on average daily traffic is discussed at the end ofthis section.

The initial surface pollutant load (P ) is the pounds of pollutantson the surface at the beginning of the accumulation period. Theaccumulation period can be intervals within an actual rainfall record,intervals within a series of design storms, or the period prior to a

single design storm event.

If an accumulation period follows a large storm event, the initial

surface pollutant load will be considered zero (Po=0). The definitionof a large storm is based upon that used in the Stormwater ManagementModel (SWMM) for the rate of pollutant removal during a storm event

(6). For purposes of the predictive procedure, a large storm event is

defined as one with greater than one inch (2.5*1 cm) of total rainfalland having at least one hour in which the average intensity is 0.5inches per hour (1.27 cm/hr) . For such a storm, it is assumed in SWMMthat approximately 90 percent of the surface pollutants available forwash-off have been removed. For the remainder of this report, any

storm meeting the above rainfall requirements is referred as to a largestorm event.

For succeeding rainfall events in a continuous rainfall record, PQ is

the surface pollutant load remaining after wash-off from the previousrainfall event. For rainfall records which do not follow a large

storm event or for design storms, the initial surface pollutant load

must be estimated using a site specific Kj value, site length and a

specified period of build-up. An analysis of monitored wash-off data

and rainfall records during the subject study suggests that dry periodsgreater than 20 days over-estimate the surface load. The initial

surface pollutant load for a site with a K, of 80, and a site length of

5 mi les would be:

80 .

] b/ x 5 mi. x 20 days = 8,000 lbs (3,629 kg)mi -day

16

Page 29: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

However, the model user may choose any accumulation period based upon

site specific data or design criteria. For any site, a maximum accumu-

lation period is governed by wind, traffic, curb type, sweeping and

other site specific factors which limit the pollutant load within a

highway system. This analysis will assume 20 days to be the maximum.

The flow diagram of Figure 1 depicts the steps leading to an estima-

tion of the pollutant level after build-up for any period of accumu-

lation. This diagram also shows the various methods of estimating

the initial surface pollutant load, PQ .

Surface Pollutant Accumulation Variable (K^) Development

K] was developed from monitored data using one of the following

methods depending upon available data records:

Method 1. Uses a period between two large storm events in

which all of the storm events were monitored.

Assuming the two large storm events wash off

essentially all of the surface pollutants, then

the wash-off data in pounds (kilograms) from

all the monitored events should account for all

pollutants accumulated during this period.

Method 2. Uses a period between two large storm events in

which only some of the storm events were monitored.The monitored wash-off data are used to estimatepollutant wash-off for unmonitored events.Estimated and actual wash-off data should providea reasonable value for total surface pollutantsaccumulated between the two large rainfall events.

Method I is preferred for estimating K, because it is based entirelyon monitored data. The required monitoring data and a sample calcula-tion of a K^ value using Method I for the Milwaukee 1-794 site arepresented in Table 8.

The storm event on 7/30/76, 1.59 inches (4.04 cm) of rainfall, waslarge enough to wash off essentially all surface pollutants. Thepounds of total solids accumulated during this period is the sum of

all total solids monitored, ending with the 1.05 inches (2.67 cm) ofrainfall on 8/28/76 which is assumed to wash off all remaining surfacepollutants. Kj is calculated by dividing pounds of total solidswashed off by highway length in miles (kilometers) and the number ofdays during the accumulation period. Figure 2 displays this accumula-tion, wash-off relationship. The second method for developing Kj wasused for sites where runoff quality for all storm events between two

large rainfalls was not monitored, however runoff volume and durationwas available. The first step was to express all pollutant wash-offdata for monitored events in terms of runoff intensity, lbs/(in./hr)(kg/(cm/hr) ) . Runoff rates were chosen as the units for data normal i-

17

Page 30: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

INITIAL SURFACEPOLLUTANT LOAD,

b

pq

=LARGE STORM

EVENT

Pq

= K1

x 20

DAYS x HL

DESIGN STORMOR NO

LARGE STORMEVENT

Po = lb

v LEFTy

AFTER WASH-OFF

CONTINUOUSRAINFALL RECORD

POLLUTANT LEVELAFTER BUILD-UP

lb

KEY

PQ = INITIAL SURFACE POLLUTANT LOAD

P = POLLUTANT LEVEL AFTER BUILD-UPK-\ - POLLUTANT ACCUMULATION RATET = TIME OF ACCUMULATIONHL = HIGHWAY LENGTH

Figure 1. Estimation of pollutant level after build-up.

18

Page 31: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 8. Example of rainfall record and monitoring data neededto develop Kj using Method I.

Maximum intensityTotal du ring any one

rainfal Is, hour of rain fall, Total solidsDate inches in./hr monitored, lb

7/30/76 1.59 1.02 -_

8/5/76 0.05 — 14

8/13/76 0.64 — 948/25/76 0.14 — 298/28/76 1.05 0.74 135

272 lb

accumulated

Kj = 272 lb/(0.15 mi (highway length at l-794)/29 days) =

62.5 Ib/mi-day (17.6 kg/km-day)

.

metric units: in. x 2.54 = cmlb x 0.454 = kg

zation because rate of runoff is the control ing mechanism which carriespollutants within the drainage system. Monitored events with associ-ated pounds of pollutants per runoff rate, were then grouped into

three rainfall categories as listed in Table 9: 0.05 to 0.10 inches

(0.13 to 0.25 cm), 0.11 to 1.00 inches (0.28 to 2.54 cm) and greaterthan 1.00 inch (2.54 cm). Any rainfall less than 0.05 inches (0.13 cm)

is considered a trace of rain which will not produce runoff ofsufficient volume and rate to effect pollutant wash-off. An averagepounds per runoff rate from each of the three rainfall categorieswas then applied to the appropriate unmonitored rainfall event for

which runoff rate was calculated. The pounds of total solids,monitored and estimated, are then summed for the entire period. An

example of K^ development using Method 2 is presented in Table 3. As

in Method I, the assumption is used that the two large storm eventswash off essentially all of the surface pollutants. The summed poundsof total solids (monitored and estimated) should therefore account for

all pollutants accumulated during this period. Using the sum of pre-

dicted and monitored total solids wash off, (Table 10), the Kj factorcan be estimated as follows:

K] = 1400 lbs v (0.15 mi. (highway length at 1-794 x 153 days)= 62.7 lbs/mi -day (17-7 kg/km-day)

If the three rainfall categories are not used, pollutant wash-off pre-

dictions for small rainfalls, 0.05 to 0.10 inches (0.13 to 0.25 cm)

are high and pollutant wash-off predictions for large rainfalls,> 1 . 00 inch (2.54 cm), are low. The range of mean values, total solids

per runoff rate, for the three rainfall categories of Table 9 indicate

19

Page 32: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

©

12

-a-

]O

IA

Oo

tVA ©

~T

1«n

5

-a-

0)

0).*3re

*—SO a:r^CT> *^~

*«A >

UJ 4)

t-<4J o (AW "Oa ecOi < —3 o< z.

UJV)

_i w< reo

o4-»

reure«-u3

0)

3

^*3

•"! 'TlVdNIW qi *i3A3i si aovjuns

20

Page 33: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

cDl<D4->

fO

o_~roM- •

C M3•— r-».

03 CA!_ —> „-Q <u

4-1

a) .—+j c/>

roi_ -cr

CT\u- r-~n- i

O —c3 •*

1_ <v

<u1_ ^0) 3Q. 03

2CO i—T3 .—•— 21f^o <D

CO -C4-t

r—<D +J•M 01

o

cn

<u

^<D

\n +j"O 03 ^^•— s_ l_t— j:O <+- v_ CM LA cn LA fA fA CM i—

i

00 O -a-CO u-

O c -a- OO ca OO O o CA -3" CM O vO— c .

vO O CO P^ VO cn o LA LA O <NfO 3

CM -3- -a- OO -a- r-* cn|v£ O M3 CO4-> L- v. 1—o -Qh- L- —

<uQ.

-Q

C03

<D

2T

C03

SI

tf) r—D•~ •>

-Do a)10 i_ -3" 1^* LA -3- cn oo oo cn LA

o ^~ OO -3" cn CN cn CM LA CA*— +-" CA t—CD .—4-1 co oH- E

d)4->

ro»_ i_ CA <a CA r-^ CA -3- CM t— LA

-C LA ^— cn o vO CM CA -a- CMM- \ O CSI o *— o r— O fA CMM-o C O o o o o o O O OC .—3a:

MC

03L_ • la o CA -a- -a- LA o <7\ LA

c o cn CA vO — CO CA LA Op—ID o o o o o O O 1

,

4->

o1-

0) LA CO co fA LA cn cn O co+J ^ r— CN «— CM ^ fa> fA CM03 oo s \ ^. \ cn ^ \ ^a vO r-» oo oo cn r>» CO

1— •

(0 c o O4- •— »— Oc • •

.— ^ o »—<TJ >l_

O1 1

^— cn la ?—03 0) o r— •

4-> 4J • • r—o 03 o o Ah- O

Eo

I CD

LA ||

CM -3-

LA>: -a-

(/) o0)-C XoC -Q

21

Page 34: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

CM

"OoXM •

<D v£>

S r^<T\

cn ^~c•— •*

Cft <u3 M

IJ- 1ft

«+-

o-srx Cnw r>»

03 i

2 —tft »X OJ•— 0)t— j*O 3tft ro

2r— r—ro •—+j XO1- <uX

4-J

o M•— fO

0>

Xro1-

o M-•M O-o X<D (ft

»- ro

O 2— (ft

c x>o —2: —

o(ft

ro •

•M «4-

O M-•M O

I

-o X<D tfi

•m ro

O 2X (ft

(0 "os_ .—O. —

o(/)

u x

M- Co —C3

ro —+j —O ro— M-

c

rou

J*-. LTV (T\ -a- ^3- CT> LTV COCOco -a- ltv »— cn cm ca cn cm

ro

XI

3E3ooro

u)xi

I (MOOSCO OmvON'-NJ-O'-vOO'-'-MOICM-3-LTV CT> PA vDCO i- ISJ-COvOOO N LTVKT

ooeor^j-cnnr-cvjNC^j-iArNvDcMcncMMvDLA»— OCMCM»— CMOOOCOO'— OCMO«-00OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

UMflOr0 00 1AlAMOlfl-3, 4, ir\OMAOO->-m\Or- LrtCTlOOMinOvOr-O MOOMNCMOOOOOOOOO^OOO'-CDOO'—

LAOIAOO O POOO-3- rNOO OU\(VMACO r- CTl OMT\

ia\wsns.n vn\oo w^v cn cn^ oLTiUMAmvDvOvflvONN CO CO CO Cn *-

(/>

0)

ro

>X0)

"CI

L.

D.

(ft

<D

3

ro

>

0)t_

o

coE

COC

+J E cn.— O -*4-J

(ft II II

-O3 <r -a-(ft LA LT\

• -3"

X • CM •

a) 0> O4-> « Xro XI X^— •— •

3 1ft C XU (ft •— r—

oro o.O • •

i_ (ft

t/> 0) Mro > •—2 CD C

c 3E 0)

3 X (J

oo 2l_

• <Dro E

22

Page 35: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

why errors in estimating pollutant wash-off occur if only one averageis used.

The minimum runoff duration that can be used in calculating averagerunoff intensity is 0.5 hours. Short duration flows, less than 0.5hours, are often the result of small storms producing less than 0.1

inches (.25 cm) of flow. Using the high average runoff rates calcu-lated from such storms gives more weight to the pollutant wash-offability of a small storm than occurs. For this reason, all stormsused in the predictive procedure were considered to have a duration ofat least 0.5 hours, eliminating overestimates of total solids wash-offfor short duration storms. For example, a storm producing 0.05 inches(.12 cm) of runoff in 0.17 hours (10 minutes) would have an averagerunoff rate calculated using an adjusted runoff duration of 0.5 in./hras follows:

Average runoff rate = 0.05 inches of flow * 0.5 hours= 0.10 in.hr (0.25 cm/hr)

Otherwise the average rate calculated from the actual runoff duration(0.17 hr) would be 0.29 in./hr (0.73 cm/hr) and would cause a largeoverprediction of pollutant wash-off.

Comparison of predicted total solids wash-off to monitored total

solids wash-off of Table 10 shows that values comparable to estimatedtotal solids are obtained using the rainfall category breakdown andshort duration storm adjustment for wash-off of unmonitored events.

K^ factors developed from monitored data during the subject study are1 isted in Table 1 1

.

Method 1 (all events monitored) and Method 2 (all events not monitored),give comparable results at 1-79** and Hwy 45. Use of Method 2 appearsto give reasonable estimates of pollutant accumulation (K^) whenMethod 1 cannot be implemented. However, Method 2 does not providegood Kj estimates when dry periods of greater than 20 days are con-tained within the period of analysis. The factor, pounds of pollutantsper runoff rate, does not account for dry days. Using Method 2,

estimated total pounds of pollutant wash-off for an unmonitored eventwith a 0.5 in./hr (1.27 cm/hr) runoff rate and one dry day will be

the same as an unmonitored event with a 0.5 in./hr (1.27 cm/hr) runoff

intensity and forty dry days. Method 2 wi 1 1 under-predict where long

dry periods are involved.

Denver, having an arid climate, is an example of a site where Method 2

cannot be used with confidence. During the summer monitoring periodof 1976, only two large storms appeared in the rainfall record. Thisperiod was used to calculate K^ , 1 39 • 3 lb/mi-day (53 • ** kg/km-day)

.

Within this rainfall record was a 42 day dry period. K^ is probably

23

Page 36: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 11. Kj values for monitoring sites

Averagedai ly

Ki value, Ib/mi-day1 976 1977

All events Al 1 eventstraffic, All events not Al 1 events not

Site vehicles moni tored monitored monitored monitored

1-794 53,000 63-5 62.7 96.3 100.0Hwy 45 85,000 172.5 120.2 367.7 368.9Harrisburg1-81 24,000 * 270.2 * 62.8

Nashvi 1 le

1-40 88,000 J. 210.8 * 347.3Denver1-25 149,000

J.189.3

j-90.0

Kj = lb/mi -day = (0.28 kg/km-day)* - The rainfall record did not contain a period between two

large storms for which all events were monitored.

underestimated as this site has an average daily traffic almost threetimes that of 1-794 in Milwaukee. During 1977, there was only onelarge storm event in the Denver rainfall record. The calculated Kj

value of 90.0 lb/mi-day (25.4 kg/km-day), was estimated using thelargest available rainfall, 0.65 inches (1.65 cms) over a 13.5 hourduration, at the start of the analysis period. Because of the long

dry periods and lack of large storms in the rainfall record, the sitespecific Ki values for Denver were not acceptable for use in thepredictive procedure, rather, a general K^ for Type II sites was used.

Construction activity occurred near the monitoring sites at Hwy. 45(Milwaukee) and 1-40 (Nashville) in 1977. K^ values for this periodreflect this construction activity, and these values were not used

in the development of the predictive model. At Harrisburg, 1976 wasthe first year of highway use after construction and this probablyinfluenced the high K] value for this site. The Kj value appears to

reflect some residuals from highway construction, and therefore, was

not used in the development of the predictive model.

The 1976 K1value for Nashville, 210.8 lb/mi -day (59.4 kg/km-day), is

based upon the only available data for the year, the month of October.

Findings at Milwaukee 1-794 indicate little variation in accumulationrates during summer periods. At 1-794 the K] calculated using Method

for the period 6/18/76 - 7/30/76 was 64.1 Ib/mi-day (18.1 kg/km-day)

and the Ki for the period 7/31/76 - 8/28/76 was 62.5 lb/mi -day (17.6

kg/km-day). Therefore, the Nashville 1976 K-j value is probablyrepresentative of the entire summer period. The 1976 Kj value is used

24

Page 37: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

at Nashville for predictive procedures because of the constructionactivity which occurred during 1977. Based upon average daily traffic(Table 11), the 1976 Kj value at Nashville appears reasonable.

The K] values used in predictive model for nonconstruction events are1 isted in Table 12.

Table 12. Predictive procedure Kj values.

_Site lb/mi -day Value obtained by:

Milwaukee I-794 75.6 Weighted average for Kj

values (Method 1), 1976-77Milwaukee Hwy 45 172.5 1976 K] value (Method 1)

Harrisburg 1-81 62.8 1977 Ki value (Method 2)

Nashville I-40 210.8 1976 Ki value (Method 2)

metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

mi x 1 .609 = km

Wherever possible the Method I K] value is used to the exclusion of

Ki values estimated using unmonitored events (Method 2). It is felt

that the K^ values in Table 12 best represent the total solids accumu-lation within the monitored highway systems under normal maintenanceand operation.

K^ Values in the Literature

The total solids accumulation rates for streets and highways whichappeared in a literature review of water quality impacts of highway

operations and maintenance (7) are presented in Table 13«

When making comparisons of the above total solids accumulation data,

two things must be kept in mind: 1) city streets generally accumulatemore total solids because of increased sources from which total solids

may be obtained, and 2) sweeping or a combination of sweeping and

flushing usually accounts for more total solids than an analysis of

surface runoff. The K^ values developed in this report reflect total

solids available to be washed off in surface runoff.

Previously developed K^ factors (Table 12), which ranged from 62.8

lb/mi-day at the Harrisburg site to 210.8 lb/mi-day at the Nashville

site (17.7 to 59-4 kg/km-day) were derived from runoff analysis data.

These Kj factors appear comparable to the total solids accumulation

values reported in the literature (Table 13).

25

Page 38: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 13. Published K^ values

Total solidsaccumulation rate, Sol ids col lection

lb/mi -day Location techniques Ref.

1580 Chicago City Sts. Sweeping (4)

1180 11 U.S. City Sts. Combined sweepingand flushing

(8)

10.4 Seattle Highway Runoff analysis (9)

382 Washington, D.C. Vacuuming and (10)

Hwy. flushing69.4 Seattle Highway Runoff analysis (11)

26.6 Seattle Highway Runoff analysis (12)

metric units: lb x 0.W = kg

mi x 1.609 km

A total sol ids a

was calculated f

study in Dal las,

The Texas studysection at this

The total sol ids

75-6 lb/mi -day (

accumulation rat

53,000 vehiclesvehicles per day

ccumulation rate of 54.5 lb/mi-day (15.4 kg/km-day)rom runoff analysis data reported in a highway runoffTexas (13) using an average Q/R of 0.90 and Method 1.

site is characterized as Type 1. The elevated highwaysite drains slightly more than two acres (0.8 ha).

accumulation rate at the I -794 site (Milwaukee) was

21.3 kg/km-day) which appears comparable to the Texase if the differences in average daily traffic ofper day at Milwaukee are compared to the 30,000at Texas.

Kj Selection Based on Site Characteristics

A comparison of total solids accumulation values (K^)

characteristics for four of the monitoring sites is p

Table 14.

with sitepresented in

These accumulation rates represent those that are derived from "normal"highway operation and maintenance. As explained previously, Kj

factors for years which had construction activity on or near themonitoring site were not used. The rainfall record at the Denver siteprevented a reliable estimate of Kj , and therefore, those total solids

accumulation rates will not be used in the regression analyses to

develop equations relating Kj to site characteristics. The selectionof a Kj value for sites other than those listed above require some

type of relationship for the predictive procedure to calculate a site

specific Kj . Regression analyses using the data from the sites

monitored during this project were used to develop an equation to

predict Kj . The results of regression analysis using K-\ as the depen-dent variable, and average daily traffic (ADT) and dustfall as the

26

Page 39: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

independent variables are presented in Table 15.

Table 14. Comparison of total solids accumulation rates andsite characteristics.

Total sol ids Average dai lyaccumulation, traffic, Dustfal

1

,

BarrierSite lb/mi -day vehicles/day g/mVday type

Harrisburg1-81 62.8 24,000 0.06 Flush

Mi lwaukeeI -79^ 75.6 53,000 0.43 Barrier

Mi lwaukee MountableHwy 45 172.5 85,000 0.21 curb

Nashvi 1 le Mountable1-40 210.8 88,000 0.31 curb

metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

mi x 1.609 = km

Table 15. Regression analysis results for K, (dependent variable),and ADT and dustfal 1 (independent variables).

Variablerelationship

Independentvariable

Sign ofregressioncoefficient

Linear

Semi log

Log

ADT + 0.93 0.87Dustfal

1

+ 0.17 0.03

ADT, Dustfal

1

+ ,- 0.96 0.93

ADT + 0.87 0.75Dustfal

1

+ 0.41 0.17ADT, Dustfal

1

+ ,- 0.95 0.91

ADT + 0.90 0.81

Dustfal

1

+ 0.14 0.02

ADT, Dustfal

1

+ ," 0.97 0.95

Because of the small number of cases (n-4) , nothing can be said

statistically about the correlation of K, with average daily trafficand dustfal 1. The purpose of performing the regression analysis was

to provide the best equation with the available data. However, averagedaily traffic appears to show a strong relationship with K-j values

27

Page 40: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

when these two parameters are graphed (Figure 3). The computed Kj

for Dallas (13) was included as an additional point for comparison.Based upon the graph, ADT within the range of 25,000 to 90,000 vehiclesper day appears to give reasonable estimates of Kj

.

Regression analyses using the monitored dustfall data obtained duringthis study, show dustfall to be a poor estimator of K^ (low R2 values).In fact, when analyzed in combination with ADT, the regression analysesshow a negative relationship to Kj (negative regression coefficient).This means that as the dustfall increases the accumulation of total

solids decreases. This relationship is contrary to the positiverelationship which would be expected between dustfall and K^ . Theseresults are probably due to the small number of sites (n=4) whichcould be used in the regression analyses. Therefore, no equation is

used in the predictive procedure to predict Kj from dustfall alone(because of low R2 values) or in combination with ADT (because ofnegative regression coefficients).

Barrier type is difficult to quantify, but probably has some effecton total solids accumulation. With a flush shoulder on a highway,there is nothing to restrict total solids from being blown off.

Mountable curbs provide some restriction while side barriers help toretain a greater proportion of the total solids than mountable curbsor flush shoulders. Because of the limited data, an evaluation of theeffect of curb type on Ki values estimated for the study sites cannotbe made.

For those cases in which a site specific K« value is not available,the predictive procedure uses ADT to calculate the appropriate totalsolids buildup rate using the following equation;

K, = (ADT* 89

) 0.007 (3)

WASH-OFF COEFFICIENT (f<2

) DEVELOPMENT

The coefficient K£ is used in the predictive procedure to remove a

portion of the carrier pollutant from the surface of the drainage area.

The general wash-off equation that is used in the Corps of EngineersSTORM model (3) and EPA Stormwater Management Model (H) is used in

this procedure in the following form:

PD

= P (1-e" K2r

) (k)

Where: P_ = pounds (kilograms) of pollutant dischargedP = surface load at start of the runoff event

(Equation 2)

K2 = wash-off coefficientr = average runoff rate, in./hr (cm/hr)

28

Page 41: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

EQUATION OF CURVE :

ACC = ADT°-89 x 0.007

< OJ-i -a=5 I

s: —=> Eo \O -Q< —CO •>

Q ^-n— <_>

—I Oo <CO v—

'

< h-

£2

22&-

200-

175-

150-

125-

100-

75-

50-

25-

HARRISBURG

©DALLAS

MILWAUKEE-HWY. 794

MILWAUKEEHWY. 45

1 \ 1 1

1—

10,000 30,000 50,000 70,000 90,000

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) , VEHICLES/DAY

Figure 3« Selected total solids accumulation rates versusaverage daily traffic.

29

Page 42: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

The terms of Equation k were determined in the following manner. P

is the calculated pounds of the carrier pollutant, total solids, on the

surface of the drainage area from Equation 2. The average runoff rate

(r) is calculated using Equation 1 and the equation for flow duration.K2 is selected based upon the drainage area configuration (Type I, II

or III). Equation k utilizes the average runoff rate because it

showed the best correlation to discharge loads monitored at each site.

A sensitivity analysis based upon a comparison of predicted andmeasured total solids was used to develop K2 values for each site.

For a series of monitored events at a particular site, the build-upand wash-off equations (2 and k) were applied using different K2 valuesto determine the best fit for the total of all events. For the pre-liminary analysis, a range of K2 values from 1 to 20 was selectedbecause this range was thought to include the wash-off potential that

could be expected for highway sites. A K2 of 1 will remove 22 percentof the available pollutant land when r is equal to 0.25 inches perhour (0.63 cm/hr) , while a K2 of 20 removes 99 percent with the samer value.

Table 16 presents the results of applying a K2 value of 1 and 20 to

actual runoff and dry day data for the Milwaukee 1-79^ site. The K]

value used in this analysis was 63 lb/mi-day (17.2 kg/km-day) as

developed previously. This sensitivity analysis shows that a K2 valueof one washes off 777-3 lb (352.6 kb) of total solids, while a K2

value of 20 approximately doubles the pounds washed off.

Figure k shows a graph of the measured total solids discharged for

nine monitored events and the corresponding computed values during1976 at Milwaukee 1-79^ To determine the operating range of K2,

values (1, 5, 3 and 20) were selected for analysis in order to underand over predict the measured data. From the Figure, it can be seen

that the K2 values of 1 and 20 did not provide good estimates of thetotal solids washed off, while K2 values of 5 and 8 provided betterestimates. This same procedure was used for the other monitoringsites. The monitored rainfall events in which total solids weremeasured at each site were compared to predicted total solids usingK2 values that ranged from 1 to 20. Those values that were closestto the sum of the measured values were then graphically compared to

individual events as shown in Figures k to 11. The range of K2 valuesthat were selected for each site are presented in Table 17-

For purposes of the predictive procedure, a single K2 value wasrequired for each of the three site categories. The values in Table17 are generally in the range of 5-8 with the exception of Harrisburg.Based upon the comparison of individual K2 values with actual monitor-ing data, the K2 value of 6.5 was selected as representative of theMilwaukee Highway 45, Nashville and Denver sites which contain sometype of curb or barrier, structured drainage and grassy right-of-way(Type II). For the Harrisburg site a value of 12 was selected as

30

Page 43: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table; 16. K2 sensitivity at Mi lwaukee 1-794.

K2=1, K2=20,Runoff, Dry pounds pounds

Date in. days washed-off washed-off

5/10/76 0.187 5 8.1 46.1

5/15/76 0.07^ 5 6.2 37.45/28/76 0.240 13 43.3 132.8

5/30/76 0.290 2 5.0 8.7

6/13/76 0.138 14 39-3 134.46/18/76 0.213 5 60.3 55.66/24/76 0.021 6 6.4 19.56/27/76 0.027 3 8.6 27.4

7/28/76 0.093 31 54.6 280.0

7/30/76 0.341 2 167.7 70.78/5/76 0.053 6 24.4 37.28/13/76 0.107 8 51.0 77.78/25/76 0.062 12 34.6 88.38/28/76 0.225 3 114.1 63.1

9/1/76 0.091 4 42.7 32.3

9/9/76 0.124 8 61.0 75.09/9/76 0.031 10 17.1 47.2

10/5/76 0.064 16 42.9 148.5Total » — ™ — 777.3 1371.9

metric units: lb x

in. x

0.454 = kg

2.54 = cm

Table 17. Range of l<£ values for each monitoring site,

Site *2

Milwaukee 1-794

Mi lwaukee Hwy 45Harrisburg 1-81

Nashville I -40

5-85-8

4-205-8

31

Page 44: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Qill

cc-) o

r— LT5 CO 00 CM

II II < II II

CM CM UJ CM CM^ ^ i> ^ ^

III Va M 75 a

vO

CTi

>

coin

CM

crv

4)

2

3

(s6>| = pQvo * sq|)

savsanosnvioi

32

Page 45: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

QLUoc

w 5) °°ii < n

cm ai cm^ 2 ^

vl i00 »»

co

SZSZSZS200

fr

(0r-

oCO

CM

-3"

3

ZSZSZSZ5ZSZ5Z5Z5Z5ZSZSZSZ52XZ5

szszszszszszszszszszs

I I I I I I I I I I I I

CO

ooCM

in

3

(s6>| = frgfrO x sq|)

san 'sanos ~iv±o±

33

Page 46: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

CC

Din CO CO

ii < II

CN LU CM^ ^ ^

u<u

*«)

in

CM

-3-

3

5

a)

3

I I I I i i i i—r~r~

r

ooCN

OID

OO oin

(sB>) = fr9t7'0x sq|)

san 'sanosnvioi

3k

Page 47: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

aLLI

DC

Dto V) 00ii < II

CN LLI CMX. :> X.

OfHZBKKKXKSeKCK

» * *; • • *»•*•/\y\^yyyvy\yyyv^^7V^

AAAA

LOCN

00

!3DKKK2KI3Ki

iAAAAAAAA/•: :*: x >: m. :*: .*: :«

00CM

B555Ss

8oCO

oooLO

ooooooCM

(sB>| = frgfO x sqi)

savsanoswioi

V)t-2LU>LU

cc

OI-v>

vO

CT>

co

CN

LTv

2

0)

ro

2

a)L.

3

35

Page 48: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

QLUccD

lO y, 00II < II

cnUJ CM* ^ ^

S&H'y

CO

CO

o4)

HI VI

>LU

in-a-

2oc

o1-

>-

3flj

5

CO

0)u3

(s6>| = frg^o x sq|)

sai 'sanos~ivio±

36

Page 49: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

1800 —|

1600 —

1200 —

coCO_i ^CO -*

Q II

_J "*800 —

400

01 K:

= 4

MEASURED

K2= 20

5/16 10/20-21

1976 STORM EVENTS

Figure 9- Harrisburg K~ selection, 1 976

37

Page 50: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

s s-*

MEASURED

V*',>%v. K

2=20

COCO -~

CO -*

Q ii

!j'*'

o 33

°'

h- .QO =

300-

200

100-

15:?:sm Sm

knk16/6 6/9

»S

» v|i sli «in 1 , 1 Ml r

1 1i 1 1 1

6/14 6/17 ' 6/25 6/25

1977 STORM EVENTS

Figure 10. Harrisburg «2

selection, 1977

33

Page 51: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

in co co

n < ii

CN £ CM^ 2 *

IHH au

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIII!iiiinnlllll™^^

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

llllllll

minium

t—i—i—i—i—i—

r

oooCO

(s6>| = ^gt-o x sqi)

sai 'sanos ivioi

39

o

1ȣ

>

en

03

i_

Den

Page 52: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

representative of a rural, flush shouldered site which uses grassyditch conveyance for the surface runoff. A K2 value of 5.0 wasselected for the Milwaukee 1-79^ site. This value will be used forall elevated bridge decks which are completely paved. A summary ofthese values for each site type is presented in Table 18.

Table 18. K2 values used in predictive procedure.

Site type K2

Type I 5.0Type II 6.5Type I I I 12.0

The Type III site requires the highest K2 value in order to wash offlarger amounts of the pollutant load per runoff volume than othersites. The flush shoulder and the nonpaved drainage conditions whichcharacterize this site type probably account for the high value in

that more pollutant wash-off is required per event to remove thepollutant load contained within the grassy areas adjacent to the road-way. The Type I site has the lowest K2 value which indicates that it

is easier to wash off pollutants from a site which is all paved thana site which has both paved and unpaved areas (Type II and III).

The data used in the selection of these K2 values are listed in AppendixB, Tables B-1 - B-4. These tables present the predicted and measuredtotal solids values for each K2 in the selected range of values on

Table 17. It must be pointed out that the values in these tables arebased upon nonwinter conditions and that more emphasis is placed upon

nonconstruction years (1976 at Milwaukee Hwy. 45 and 1977 at Nashville).Small differences between individual total loads for each K2 value wereneglected in assigning the three site specific K2 values.

CONSTITUENT LOADINGS

The final component of the predictive procedure transforms the poundsof total solids washed off into pounds of lead, COD, suspended solidsor any other of the 16 quality constituents available in the model.

The resulting loadings may be used to evaluate the impact of thesedischarges on the receiving water or to evaluate the loads as requiredby special model application. A general approach for determining therelative impact of these loadings on the receiving water is discussedin Section V (page 88).

The prediction of heavy metals, nutrients, solids and other parametersfor individual storm events relies upon the correlation of measuredtotal solids loads to the measured loads for each of the remainingparameters. Tables 19 and 20 present the results of each of theselinear regressions in the form of an equation for predicting eachparameter as a function of the total solids load for each site. For

ko

Page 53: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 19. Constituent equations developed for Type I

and Type I I I sites.

Paramete r

Type 1

Milwaukee 1-794Type III

Harrisburg 1-40

SS s 0.53TS - 3.2* 0.32TS - 36.8*

VSS S 0.191TS + 0.2* 0.061TS-3.3*

TVS S 0.221TS + 13.3 0.32TS - 32.3*

TKN S 3.3xlO" 3 TS + 0.16 3.lxlO_3TS+ 0.55*

BOD S 0.023TS + 1.5* N/A

TOC = 0.057TS + 0.80* O.O68TS - 5.85*

COD as 0.202TS + 5.47* 0.087TS + 0.65*

TN s 1.37xl0" 3 TS + 0.12 1.83x10 TS+0.054*

TPOi, s l.OxlO" 3 TS + 3-OxlO"11

2.15xlo"3TS - 0.245

Cl~ = 0.034TS + 2.59 0.135TS + 2.6*

Pb s 5.6xlO~ 3TS - 0.02*4 4.1xlO_Zt

TS - 0.029*

Zn B-4

8.4x10 TS + 0.014 2.67xl0"4TS-0.0ll*

Fe

Cu

0.015TS + 0.59

-4 -2,2.9x10 TS+7.3xlO 4

0.014TS - 1.61*

-c "3*7.4x10 5TS+8. 78x10

Cd S 1.4x10 TS-1.4xl0~ 3 4.0xlO_5TS+0.007

Cr B-4 -3

1.6x10 TS+1.2xlO-4

2.3x10 TS-0.028

Hg S-7 -4

-7-6x10 TS+8.8x10 -5.8xlO"6TS+0.015*

Note: TS = total solids (lb)

* - Variables correlate at the 95 percent confidence level,

metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

41

Page 54: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

•it # *f*M»M^

•JC o o o•k -js -ic -a -a vo *- i— *-CO 1AU\ OON CN X X X

LA O CM O OO OfAf-SCM

1

•!« -K • -JC <K •£ • • •£ • • * ....•K NO\OlA4, 00001AOOMONJ''-

"

"

|">» . • ... . -3*

OvO 1 fCOOM IOI 1 •! 1 1 +1_ m< 3" *- .— -3" r- r-<D ca co coco co co t/> co co to

• > + +(-+ + + HI- + h- H i h- t- \- h-in • C i ca ca ca ca-3- -3- la la r«>.

(0 a> (/) V) 1 (A (/)(/) 1 1 CO I 1 00 1 1 1 1

4-1 Q CO |— 1— Of— t-H OOI— OOI— oooo•_ (-(TlfA'-VONOvO'-^'Lrtr.^Lftt-.-r-r-V) *— OvOXCMCAC>4XX<viXXcMXXXXSi-t-J, OOmcMrr*ONv004'vD(nvO— OOOlftOOON>-Oi-COONmvDOO0) _Q. 0)>- >H- CA <u

i_ OO •K «- a>M- * -a ca * * x oo vO CA CA LAO CA »- »— CM c•D oo co la-3- cm • o o o • a)0) 1 •K • -fc * • • -:; • O -K • • • «— -uQ. — K-3-OvOcA*OOLAO r»- o o o .^O * vo ro in m . +vo + «4-

<u CA • • 1 - r— - -1- I r-— -> •+ + + cU -— • LA CA CA CM \D «— COO CO o> 1— -3" CO CA coco CO (— CO CO CO I— oa> •—

1 + h- 1 + 1- h- + 1—3- I 1- 1- 1-vOd > i ca +^r ca ^r i -a- la la i 4-1

-C CO CO 1 COCO 1 1 CO 1 O CO 1 1 I O cV) V) COI— |— OH 1— COOOI— Oi— h- O O O «— a)c f(J h 4- (*\ - OO 1ft f- <- ^N<- XCAr-r- <- X uo z CO •- CM XLA4TS X X i- X lAi- X X X vO 1_

4J(0

^N-TO^OOi-OMSONNOr-N-a-vO a)

Q.ooor»»ooocA-3-ocoLAO«— vocmi-3 LAV CA

4-1 SI U)c 4-) ^0) -3-

3 •JC 1 +-» II

4-1 •fc CA -ic * O fD•— LA t— -ic CA CO r»>. CA «— -3-4-) -3- •5C -3" LA <— CMLAOX (0 LAV) CO-K CO« O. r-Or-CO 4-1-3-c • • -Cj" • C3 * CD -JC • • • • ^-v ro •

o -3* • -jjt- -ico -3- o o o cm -Q — oo a -it o \o-siCA i cm +« I— CDLAVOCO+CMOCM + CAI CM + + + + •—* L. XCMPAV40 CA »— COCM CO »— V.

• CO LA CO+ COI— CO|— COCOCOCO <n o -ao <u + + 1- + + 1—3" + 1—a- 1 1- 1- H h- o o —CM ^ i pa co -3-i -3- i -a- LA LAVO .—

3 CO CO 1 1— CO CO 1 OCOI OCOI 1 1 1 I— {/)

<u OJ CO|— h-OLAI— 1— 0«-|— O «- 1— OOOO o <u ..•— J l-NJ- ^vOPsc^r- X-3-*- ><•-»-•-•-»— (/> •— tf)

-Q ocAOxoojooxvocoxr^ojxxxx JD 4-)

<0 '£ Si-N'-OOOi-vOO(n\OOOSfACO4-1

fO —— cL. 3OOOOOOOOr»«r"xOCAcAO\OCMCA-3"

o fO4-J > o

II 1 L.4J

1_ CO a a)

4-J1- E

CD -3"

E CO CO 2 O O Q O • •

(0 coco>i<iooozQ-^-ja c <d 3-0 l- o» <DL, </>>!— 1— 0Q|— OI— 1— OQ.MU-OOOX 4-1

ro o

42

Page 55: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

example, the determination of the COD load for the Milwaukee 1-79**

site is as fol lows:

COD (lb) = 0.202 TS + 5.^7where: TS = total solids in pounds

The asterisk in Tables 19 and 20 next to some equations indicates sig-

nificance at the 95 percent confidence limits (1). This indicatesthat one can be 95 percent confident that the sample was not selectedfrom a population for which no correlation exists (i.e. that thecoorelation coefficient R is equal to zero). An equation may stillprovide good estimates even if the variables in that equation do notshow a significant correlation at the 95 percent confidence level. In

fact, an equation developed using regression techniques is the bestfit model of the data being analyzed. For this reason, all theequations developed to predict various pollutant parameters from totalsolids will be used in the predictive procedure. The asterisks wereused in Tables 19 and 20 only to indicate the relative strength ofthe correlation between the variables in each equation. However, mostof the variables did show a correlation at the 95 percent confidencelevel

.

The predictive procedure will use a separate constituent equation foreach general site type. Individual equations are required to accountfor differences between sites in drainage and solids retentioncharacteristics. Table 21 provides the calculated loading for each ofthe five monitoring sites using individual constituent equations fromTables 19 and 20 and a general site equation for Type II areas.Suspended solids, COD, lead, iron, and TPO4, are listed to evaluate theindividual loadings. A given range of total solids loads varying from

500 to 10,000 pounds is used to determine the constituent load for theabove parameters. The numerical average of the three locations com-prising Type II sites, as well as the results for a general Type II

site equation from Table 20 are also listed to provide an indicationof the accuracy of each approach. The site specific equations providezero loadings for the Milwaukee Hwy. A5 site for some parameters whenless than 500 pounds of total solids are available. The regressionequations used to develop these relationships are based upon actual

monitoring data which did not include a runoff event with less than

490 pounds of total solids. In the same manner, the TPOjj loads arenot accurate at the 2,000 to 10,000 pound load range since no actual

data points of this magnitude were available to produce the predictiveequation. To account for these differences, the average equation of

Table 22 will be used in the predictive procedure for the Type II

si tes.

The use of the general Type II site equation as compared to individual

Milwaukee, Nashville and Denver equations was checked by comparingthe general equation to the site specific equation using the t test.

The two equations did not differ at a 95 percent confidence level and

*»3

Page 56: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

V)

cO

3CT0)

0>en(D-.

0)

>(0

oc«D

to

co

3cr<U

uQ.(/)

0)

cnc(A3«/)

«D

O

C

3

4-1

1/1

Coo

(Dua.

OJ

la

I-

01 LA*J -3-

</) 5u —

_— O —— »-r Dai

0) c cO- o>• .- C -O4J *> 4) £no op— 3 O<D <T 1

l. V(1) JCc Ul

4) ID

IS Z

LA-T

2•o —<o —o x:

+0)cn C<o a>t- o0)> +<

-Cin(0Z

0)4) LA-* -T3m >•

3 2— x£

l_

0) LA> tMC 1

4) _O

41

— O>CO-C 1

in —10z

cnL.

3-O Oin -3"

l_ —u10X

4)4)_X -3-

3 CAio r-»

3 i

-E

in

-o

— inO 73m c

3— oto a4Jo1-

LA -- -3- CO\fl NCOCOf— -3- O CA— LA

CA r*.-3- CAcm vO LA.3-

— CM ca O

LA CM -- CA CO LA CO O ca\o r-*. o o o o o CM LA — vOco -3- r»» © co co r». evi TOON r^co r-» ca CO CA CM rA— -s- o — •- N* O

t- \o CM O — <M O LA-3- J- CA O — J- CM— —• CA CA CM

"DC 0\OMA O CM -3- -3- LA LA LA C^ o o o o O VO3 r». r>-co r-» -- CALA -3" CA CACO CM CA — CA — CMo - CO -3- — CM CM CA • • • • • • • • •

a. vOin

o O — CAin

CO CACOCM CA in

o — r-

i Ul o "o •— "OTJ C c c

in C 3 3 3o 3 o o o— o a. Q. a_l a.o CA — \Q vO CAvO CM O i CM — O O 1 cm i— r-. r-. 1 o LA LA LAto — "•»-».— i — r~~ o — LA — CACO O J- CA LA vO CM LA CA

CAvO CA O CM CA P>- CA o z -3" •o •- r>«. a ca < O — CM — o — caco r>» O O — CM CMLU o LU |H 0£ — CM -3- -3- 0. V—o <_> _l — CM r-zLUa.«/>3in f*. CA CM \© N rvivrv " »— CM CO O CO CA CA CA r-». la co

CA r*»v© CM CO O CA CA LA — CA CA O CO CA CA CO CM CA CACM -3- CACO i- CM -T P^ • • • • • • •

-T " O — — CO VO CM VO -3"

— CM CA9rm -3- CO SO

-3"

-3- LA l>».CACM CO O CO— CM VO •-

-iAi-ir«.\9(MU\SCM LA O CM

-- LA

O O O OO O O OLA O O O

CA CA CM CMCM NO CACO— \o

CACO LA CMCM LA -- f-»

•- LA

CA CA CA CA— CA LA CACA O LA OCO CA O CM

© © O-T

O O O OO O O OLA O O O

o o o oo o o oLA O O O

VO-T CO VO— CM-3-

O O O OO O O OLA O O O

O O O Oo o o oLA O O O

-3-

LA

dx

kk

Page 57: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 22. Constituent equations developed for Type II sites

Parameter Equation

SS 0.63TS - 188

VSS 0.152TS +13.5

TVS 0.263TS + 243

TKN 5.^6x10"3ts +1.28

BOD 3.0xlO"2TS +28.3

TOC 5.6x10"2TS + 25.2

COD 0.193TS + 275-3

TN 1.3xlO" 3TS + 0.713

TPO4 2.25x10" 3TS - 0.32

CI 0.042TS + 87

Pb 1.02x10"3tS + 0.04

Zn 5.84xlO"^TS + 0.103

Fe 1.96xl0_2TS - 5-0

Ni N/A

Cu 3.l6x10-2fTS + 0.064

Cd 4.l6x10~ 5TS + 0.021

Cr 4.3x10~5tS + 0.036

Hg 2.44x10" 6TS + 1.006x10" 6

Note: TS - total solids (lb)

metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

45

Page 58: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

are used in the model for Type II sites. Large differences in the

equations for suspended solids, especially at the Milwaukee 45 site,

presents difficulties at low total solids levels. For those events

in which the total solids load is less than 300 pounds (136 kg), thesuspended solids equation results in negative numbers or zero load.

Construction activity at this Milwaukee site during 1977 is the primaryreason for the large discrepancy between sites.

Tables 23, 24 and 25 list the calculated and measured lead, andsuspended solids values for some of the sites using the Type I site

specific and Type II general equations. These data points are deter-mined using the actual measured total solids load for determiningeach of these parameters. Later discussions in Section IV show howthe computed total solids, lead and suspended solids data using themodel compares to the corresponding measured data.

Applying the Type I site equation to Milwaukee 1-794 monitored total

solids data (Table 23) produced calculated values for suspended solidsand lead which Were comparable to measured values on an event basis.

A comparison of the sum for all events of calculated and measuredvalues shows that the Type I site equation over-predicts lead by 3

percent. Similar results were obtained for the Milwaukee Hwy. 45 site(Table 24) using the general Type II site equation. Summing the valuesfor all events showed that suspended solids and lead were over-pre-dicted by 7 and 6 percent respectively.

The Nashville data (Table 25) present a worst case example where a

general equation (Type II site) is applied to construction year data.The data show that calculated suspended solids are generally lower thanmeasured suspended solids on an event basis, especially for thoseevents which had low monitored total solids wash-off (less than 100 lb

(45 kb)). However, when calculated and measured values for suspendedsolids were summed for all events, calculated suspended solids wereonly 8 percent lower than measured. Although considerable variationbetween calculated and measured suspended solids wash-off occurredon an event basis, the general equation still provided reasonableestimates of suspended solids for the construction year. Overall pre-dicted lead values were 14 percent lower than measured values. A14 percent difference is acceptable for model prediction.

46

Page 59: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 23. Milwaukee 1-794 calculated suspended solids and

lead loadings using Type I site equations.

Total solids,lb measured

SuspendedMeasured

sol ids, lb

CalculatedLead, lb

Date Measured Calculated

6-18-76 87 62 43 0.69 0.467-23-76 45 15 21 0.14 0.237-30-76 a * -- * —8-5-76 14 2 4 0.02 0.058-13-76 94 40 47 0.85 0.508-25-76 29 10 12 0.10 0.148-28-76 135 97 63 1.00 0.739-9-76 98 36 49 0.37 0.529-19-76 28 8 12 0.11 0.136-8-77 35 21 15 0.19 0.176-10-77 12 3 3 0.03 0.046-11-77 173 69 88 0.66 0.946-17-77 119 49 60 0.61 0.646-28-77 12 4 3 * —6-28-77 62 42 30 k —6-30-77 84 39 41 0.40 0.457-3-77 27 10 25 * —7-17-77 115 21 58 * ~~

8-13-77 143 * 73 A

8-28-77 96 48 48 * —9-23-77 5 3

— * --

9-23-77 28 13 12 ft --

9-24-77 62 34 30 k --

Total 623 669 5.17 5.00

Note: * No data available.metric units: lb x 0.454 =f kg

47

Page 60: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 24. Milwaukee Hwy 45 calculated suspended solidsand lead loadings using Type II site equations.

Total solids,

lb measuredSuspended

Measuredsolids, lb

CalculatedLead , lb

Date Measured Calculated

6-18-76 5886 4306 3520 6.67 6.047-28-76 943 518 406 1.43 1.007-30-76 2371 1290 1306 2.76 2.468-5-76 470 127 108 0.20 0.528-14-76 2120 805 1148 2.04 2.208-25-76 4029 601 2350 1.56 4.158-27-76 2490 1636 1381 4.27 2.589-9-76 3498 2010 2016 4.67 3.619-19-76 1109 492 511 0.80 1.175-4-77 742 135 279 0.40 0.806-5-77 6149 3891 3686 8.40 6.316-5-77 8670 6151 5274 7.30 8.886-6-77 490 82 121 0.20 0.546-8-77 1123 428 519 0.80 1.196-11-77 3524 1402 2032 1.80 3.636-17-77 4849 2974 2867 4.60 *».99

6-27-77 3388 859 1946 2.50 3.496-30-77 3173 1416 1811 3.20 3.28

Total 29123 31281 53.60 56.84

metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

48

Page 61: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 25. Nashville 1-40 calculated suspended solids andlead loadings using Type II site equations.

Total solids,lb measured

SuspendedMeasured

solids, lb

CalculatedLead, lb

Date Measured C«alculated

4-21&22-77 1559 .922 794 2.23 1.634-22-77 1265 626 609 1.27 1.334-28-77 156 77 0.22 0.206-13-77 134 28 0.11 0.186-14-77 605 278 193 0.78 0.666-19-77 1943 1272 1036 4.73 2.026-22-77 1246 555 597 1.05 1.31

6-23-77 2944 1630 1667 4.10 3.046-24-77 1486 777 748 1.52 1.56

2.866-25-77 2767 1835 1555 4.059-5-77 427 220 < 81 0.46 0.489-6-77 78 30 0.09 0.129-13-77 170 66 0.19 0.21

9-13-77 595 135 187 0.52 0.659-14-77 368 161 44 0.42 0.429-14-77 3378 1504 1940 1.89 3.489-16-77 597 249 188 0.33 0.659-19-77 555 327 161 0.80 0.61

Total 20273 10692 9800 24.76 21.39

metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

49

Page 62: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION II I

INPUT REQUIREMENTS AND OUTPUT FORMAT

This section of the report contains the detailed listing of the pre-dictive procedure, as well as the description of the output. Recom-mendations for use of the procedure in both single event and long termapplication are included.

GENERAL INPUT REQUIREMENTS

The predictive procedure requires input data describing the highwaysystem under consideration and the rainfall record being evaluated.The procedure can be manually operated using a calculator or run on a

small computer for each application. The description that followswill concentrate on the desktop approach since the computer applicationfollows the same procedure but relies upon the computer to manipulateconstants and equations. Appendix C (page 119) lists the computerprogram and Appendix D (page 13*0 lists the step-by-step input

requi rements.

Site Description

The highway system that is to be analyzed must be defined as to its

total drainage area. Total drainage area for an existing system can

be that area comprising both paved and nonpaved surfaces whose runoffcontributes to a single storm sewer or drainage ditch discharge. Thus,the evaluation of an existing highway system may be comprised of a

series of small drainage areas within the discharge point. This typeof evaluation is important in those applications which are meant to

compare actual flow measurements with the output of the model. For

more general evaluations, the total area contained within the highwayright-of-way will be sufficient for analysis.

The length of the highway system must also be defined, ie. the actual

distance of the highway section from one end of the drainage areato the other end. This is in contrast to curb mile or lane mile,which is a multiple of highway length.

Curb Configuration

This parameter describes the general type of drainage configurationused to remove the paved area runoff from the surface of the highway.Within the development of the model, the monitoring data showed con-

siderable differences in hydraulics between sites which were found tobe related to these drainage structures. Harrisburg 1-81 is charac-terized by flush shoulder areas which disperse the paved runoff to

drainage ditches alongside the highway and then by overland flow to

the inlets of the storm sewer system. Milwaukee Hwy kS, Nashvillel-AO and Denver 1-25 have mountable curbs which channel the runoffalongside the curb to inlets of the storm sewer system. Figure 12

50

Page 63: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

CO

UJUJV 23 Oi b-J UJ

2 CO

tn -1

<fr <oCL>•

X h-

OJ

<u

(0

TJ

>

a

CM

<Ui.

3CD

51

Page 64: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

presents typical cross^sections for Harrisburg l-8l and Milwaukee Hwy

45. A more complete description of each of these sites is available

in Vol. IV, "Characteristics of Runoff From Operating Highways,Research Report", of this document series (1).

For purposes of analysis, three types of curb or drainage types areused in the predictive procedure; the flush shoulder which charac-

terizes the rural Harrisburg site, mountable curbs with inlets alongthese curbs for removal of the paved surface runoff, and the mountable

curb with impact barriers adjacent to each set of lanes as is charac-teristic of the elevated bridge deck at the Milwaukee 1-79** site.

These three configurations are used throughout the predictive procedureappl ication.

Average Daily Traffic

ADT or average daily traffic refers to that volume of vehicles whichpasses through the highway system on a per day basis. The averagevalue as used is determined over a long period of time to account for

weekday, weekend and seasonal variations. ADT is used to select the

proper accumulation rate for the runoff quality predictions. Theaverage volume of traffic is used since the build-up of pollutantsbefore a rainfall event is a result of an unknown time period to the

last storm exhibiting 100 percent wash-off. Further descriptions ofADT and pollutant accumulations have been discussed in the Kj componentdevelopment.

CONTINUOUS APPLICATIONS

The application of the predictive procedure or model can be utilizedfor single rainfall events or for a continuous simulation of annualor seasonal rainfall. The continuous mode of operation using thecomputer model will be explained first since the single event proce-dure relies upon the same data requirements.

An effective evaluation of highway runoff water quality includes thesimulation of a number of continuous rainfall events. The time periodspanned by these rainfall events depends largely on the climatic regionof the highway area. An arid climate might require several to manyyears of rainfall data to evaluate highway runoff water quality, whilea single year of continuous rainfall data might be sufficient in

humid areas, depending upon the objective of the simulations. Sincethe procedure is not meant to evaluate winter snow melts and frozenground conditions, only nonwinter periods should be evaluated. Anexample would be in the Milwaukee area where frost and snow coverconditions are possible between November and March of each year. In

areas of the country where frost and snow cover is not present, thesimulation can be used for the entire year.

52

Page 65: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Rainfall Selection

The rainfall data required for the model are total volume of rainfalland the corresponding duration for each event. The date of each eventis also required so that the days of pollutant accumulation betweenstorms can be evaluated. These data are usually available from the

local weather service, or listings of hourly rainfall may be obtainedfrom the U.S. Department of Commerce. (Address: U.S. Department ofCommerce, National Climatic Center, Federal Building, Asheville, N.C.

28801).

The selection of a period of record to be used to evaluate the waterquality affects of the highway can become quite complicated if ten or

twenty years of record are available. In order to assist the highwayengineer in selecting which period should be utilized for the simula-tion, the following suggestions are provided:

1. Analyze with the predictive procedure as many continuous,

complete periods as budget and time allow.

2. Based on a ranking of total rainfall volumes for eachperiod, average rainfall per storm and number of storms

with average intensities greater than one inch (2.54 cm)

per hour, select one or two periods of high, medium andlow rankings in each category. This provides a representa-tion of the rainfall record from which one or two periodscan be quickly analyzed.

3. The highest loadings to the receiving water may not be

associated with those periods of highest rainfall but

rather those of highest intensity after long buildup

periods. Selection of extreme periods should reflectthese criteria.

An example of the selection of one or two years of rainfall record foranalysis with the predictive procedure can be found in Table 26. Tenperiods of rainfall for a hypothetical area are listed according tototal rain, number of storms, average rain per storm and storms withaverage intensities greater than one inch per hour. According to thedata in this Table, 1969 contained the highest volume of rainfall andnumber of storm events, while 1976 contained the lowest volume of rain-

fall and lowest average rain per storm. The year 1974 contained thehighest average rainfall per storm. The average values for each ofthese columns provide an indication of typical conditions and the yearwhich most closely represents typical conditions is marked by anasterisk.

Based upon the data of Table 24, a typical and extreme year can beselected for each of the categories. The extreme year representingthe number 1 ranking in each category can be used to evaluate the most

53

Page 66: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 26. Nonwinter rai nfal 1 summaries for a

hypo thetical area.

Number ofTotal ra in, Number of Average rain events

Year (in .) events per event, in. >1 in./hr

1968 15.8 38 (5) 0.42 2

1969 16.4 (1) 48 (1) 0.34

1 970* 14.3 (5) 35 0.41 1

1971 15.9 41 0.39 3

1972 11.4 32 (10) 0.36 (5) 1

1973 12.8 39 0.33

1974 15.6 35 0.45 (1) 2

1975 11.1 38 0.29

1976 10.2 (10) 37 0.28 (10) 1

1977 16.0 37 0.43 3

Average 13.95 38 0.37 1.3

Note: (1) = extreme - high

(5) = typical

(10) = extreme - low" = typical year

metric units: in. x 2.54 = cm

significant water quality impact. The category of average volume ofrain per storm would best represent this need and, therefore, 1974 wouldbe selected. The year 1977 also might be selected for the samepurposes since it has the second highest volume of rain per storm but

also has three storms of average intensity greater than one inch. Atypical year such as 1970 and 1972 can be used to represent the entireperiod of record. Thus, if time or budget do not allow the analysisof all 10 years, then a typical year could be analyzed to provide an

indication of the annual load. For the example in Table 26, thetypical year selected would best be represented by 1970 since it has

values very close to the average values for the period of record forcategories of total rain and average volume of rain per storm. Also,there were not a large number of storms with an average intensity ofgreater than one inch per hour during 1970.

The period of rainfall selected for analysis is used to evaluate theresponse of the existing or proposed system for the total period andfor individual rainfall events within the period. Later descrip-

54

Page 67: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

tions of individual storms will require a look at the long term rain-

fall to set prestorm conditions as close to the actual prestorm surfaceload as possible.

MODEL OPERATION AND INPUT REQUIREMENTS

The detailed input data formats are listed in Appendix D (page 13*0to provide the model user with a step-by-step procedure. A moregeneral approach is discussed in this section of the report. Figure13 represents the flow diagram for the model operation.

Site Characteristics

The first requirement of the model is to specify the size and type ofsite that is to be analyzed. The site description is as follows:

Description Uni ts

1. Size of total drainage area Acres (ha)

2. ADT Vehicles per day

3. Type of siteTYPE I

- All paved, bridge or overpassType II - Paved and unpaved with curbs

and inlets along the pavedarea.

Type III - Rural sites with flushshoulders, grassy ditch con-veyance to inlets.

k. Site length, i.e., distance from one Miles (km)

end of drainage area to the other end.

Rainfal 1 Record

The rainfall record selected for analysis is input to the predictiveprocedure in the following manner:

Description Units

1. Number of rainfall events to be evalu-ated (1 to N).

2. Month, day and year of each event.

3. Rainfall for each event. Inches (cm)

k. Duration of each rainfall. Hours

5. Dry days prior to each rainfall. Days

The rainfall record relies upon the total volume of rain for each

event and the date on which the rainfall started. Thus, even though

the rainfall may extend over two days, the starting date is the

reference point. The dry day variable refers to the number of days

55

Page 68: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

1- u. —= U. (-

UJ(— U- UJ=> u. EO. O =>z z _io n oO OC >

J

Es_

ro

r u «O O UJU < 0-

or *O.DUJST O (-O <-> <c_> < Cg

IT

J

0_ < -I3:1O O 3

K </l O=> _j a 1

a. < — x3: I— —1 uio o o <

UJ < < u.I 1-03 c_> 3 I

a_ o —

1

x2: t/> _i too in o <<-> < a. 3

t/1Q(3 —1

OUl — UJ l/>

h- Z=> — < _

I

a. < u. <z x oc h-O UJ 3 OUKW H-

i k

O inUl H- \t- z u. \< < u. \— 1-0 1*-> 3 1 1O —I X<S> -J l/l J

</> < 1< 0- 2 /

a)i_

3-o<uooQ.

>

0)

Cf\

3

56

Page 69: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

prior to this event in which accumulation occurred. For example,a rainfall on Saturday, July 22th that was preceded by a rainfall

that ended on Sunday, July 16th, would have six days of accumulation.

Model Operation

The actual operation of the model or predictive procedure is as follows:

Runoff Volume - The volume of runoff in inches (cm) is determined by

the solution of one of following equations depending on site type.

Type I

0_ = 0.969 R -0.0187

'T^R^DD' ' 0858 * 0.470

Type I I I

Q = R 1 - 892 DD" -^ * 0.845

where; Q_ = runoff in inches (cm)

R = rainfall in inches (cm)

DD = dry days to last rainfall (minimum = 1 dry day)

For example, a TYPE II site having 0.25 inches (0.63 cm) of rain (R)

after 6 dry days (DD) would produce the following total runoff (Q)

:

= R1 ' 369 DD" * 0858 * 0.470

0_= (0.25K369) (6"" ' 0858

) (0.470)

Q = 0.06 inches of runoff (0.15 cm)

Runoff Rate - The duration of the rainfall event is used to determinethe length of the runoff period for that event. The followingequations (dependent on site type) describe this procedure:

TYPE I

FD = 1.12 RD + 0.69

TYPE I I

Dry days ^ 10

FD - 1.06 RD + 1.7.9

Dry days < 10

FD - 1.27 RD + 2.16

Type III

Dry days £ 10

FD = 1.92 RD + 4.18Dry days < 10

FD = 1.48 RD + 8.28

57

Page 70: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

where; FD = runoff duration in hours

RD = rainfall duration in hours

Thus for the example above, if the 0.25 inches (0.63 cm) of rainfall

lasted for 50 minutes, then the duration of runoff for TYPE II andsix dry days would be:

FD - 1.27 RD + 2.16

=3-22 hours

The average runoff rate (r) for this event would be calculated as

fo 1 1 ows

:

r = Q/FD0.06 in.

r =3.22 hr

= 0.019 in./hr (0.05 cm/hr)

Runoff Qual i ty - The next block of equations in the model is relatedto pollutant quality determinations. The first step in this processis to determine the pollutant accumulation rate for the site beingmodeled. The general equation for this variable is defined as:

Kt = (ADT ' 89) * 0.007

where; Kj = pollutant accumulation rate, lb/mi -day (kg/km-day)ADT = average daily traffic, vehicles/day

Continuing with the example application, if the site has an ADT of

30,000 vehicles per day, the Kj value that results would be:

Kj = (30,000°- 8 9) * 0.007= 67-6 lb/mi -day (19.1 kg/km-day)

The calculated Kj value is next used to predict the pounds of total

solids on the surface of the drainage area at the start of the stormevent.

P = Po + (Kj x HL x T)

where; PQ= initial surface pollutant load, lb

P = pollutant level after build-up, lb

K] - pollutant accumulation rate, lb/mi -day (kg/km-day)HL = highway length, mi (km)

T = time of accumulation, days (20 day maximum)

53

Page 71: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

The variable PQ is a function of the amount of pollutants left on thesurface after the last runoff event. In the long term program, thisloading is carried through the calculations on an interative basis by

subtracting the pounds washed off from the previous pollutant load.

The build-up rate, K^ is then used for each dry day to add to thisinitial level until the pollutant level at the storm start is deter-mined.

The initial estimation of a PQ is made easier if the first storm to

be evaluated follows a storm of average rainfall intensity greaterthan 0.5 inches (1.27 cm) per hour. This large storm is assumed to

wash-off essentially all of the available total solids load on thesurface. The succeeding dry days are then used to build up the availa-ble surface load to the start of storm conditions. Further descrip-tions of P and K-\ are included in the components description of thisreport.

Continuing with the example application, if the accumulation period is

six days, the highway length is 6.5 miles, K^ is 67.6 lb/mi-day (19.1

kg/km-day) (predicted from an ADT of 30,000 vehicles/day) and PQ is

zero (assume accumulation period started with a large storm), thepollutant level after build-up (P) would be:

P = P + (K] x HL x T)

= 0.0 + (67.6 x 6.5 x 6)= 2,636 pounds (1,196 kg) of total solids available at

the start of event number one

If a large rainfall event does not occur at the beginning of the initial

accumulation period, PQ must be estimated. One method is to evaluatelocal climatic data to determine the average number of dry days between

rainfall events. PQ can then be estimated using average number of

dry days, K] and highway length. In the example above, if a large

storm did not precede the initial accumulation period, and if the

average number of dry days between storms was determined to be four,

an estimate of P could be calculated as follows:

P = K| x HL x T= 67.6 x 6.5 x k

- 1,758 lb (797 kg)

The next step in the predictive procedure is to remove a portion of

the surface load P using the average runoff rate (r) calculatedpreviously.

The standard wash-off equation that is used in the model is:

P D= P (i- e-K2<-)

where; Pp = pollutant load discharged (total solids), lb (kg)

P = pollutant load at the storm start, lb (kg)

59

Page 72: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

I<2 = wash-off coefficientr = average runoff rate - in./hr (cm/hr)

K2 is selected based upon site characteristics as follows:

K2 = Type 1 Type I I Type I I I

5.0 6.5 12.0

Continuing with the example for a Type II site, the pounds of total

solids removed would be determined as follows based upon the valuespreviously calculated for P and r:

Pd:U3m^-(6. 5)(o.o. 9))

= 306 lb of total solids discharged (139 kg)

The surface load after the storm would be calculated as follows:

Po " P " P D~ 2,636 - 306= 2,330 lb of total solids remaining (1,057 kg)

PQ for event number two is 2,330 lb (1,057 kg). Another cycle ofcalculations can now begin.

The determination of any of the remaining 16 parameters available in

the model is based upon the equations of Tables 19 and 20. Thus, todetermine the pounds of lead for this storm, the equation is:

Pb = 1.02 x 10"3 (P D ) + 0.04= 1.02 x 10~3 (306) + 0.04= 0.35 lb of lead discharged (0. 1 6 kg)

The remaining quality parameters can be calculated using the appropriateequations.

The above example of the predictive procedure provides the methodologyfor calculating the pounds of total solids and lead for one storm event.The event under consideration may be a design storm or single rain-fall event which was monitored for flow and quality. In either case,the prestorm history for determining the surface total solids load

at the start of the storm is as important as the rainfall data. Con-tinuous records of rainfall are important in any application andshould be used to set the individual prestorm conditions.

60

Page 73: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION IV

PREDICTIVE PROCEDURE RESULTS

Previous descriptions of the ability of the predictive procedure to

match measured data have been presented for individual components.Within this portion of the report, the entire model is applied to

the sites which were used to develop the relationships of the model

as well as one site independent of this project's data. The final

portion of this section presents a discussion of the limitations of

the predictive procedure.

MODEL APPLICATIONS

The use of rainfall records from each of the five monitoring sites

within this project, as well as the data from another study at

Dallas, Texas (13) will be used to evaluate model accuracy. Thoseevents which have been monitored for various quality parameters will

be compared with the model output to determine its accuracy. Summariesof the input data and output results are listed in the Appendix G

(page 1^6) for all storms used in the continuous simulation. Input

data for each site is volume of rainfall, duration of rainfall, andnumber of dry days prior to each event. The K^ values calculated in

Section II for each site will be input to the model for all sites exceptDenver where the model will calculate Ki . The rainfall record at

the Denver site prevented a reliable estimate of K^ . Differencesbetween user supplied and calculated K] values will be discussed.

Milwaukee I-79**

The predictive procedure was run for the nonwinter rainfall events in

1976 and 1977- Each simulation was started, after a significant rain-fall event occurred which was assumed to wash off the surface pollutantload to base conditions. There are a total of 33 events used forcomparison of the predicted and monitored runoff quality. Appendix G

(pages 146 to 15*0 presents the model output data for these eventswith the rainfall volume and duration plus the K^ value determinedin Section II as the model input. The model output provides rainfalland runoff summaries, as well as surface loadings before and aftereach event

.

Table 27 lists the measured and computed quality results for total andsuspended solids, TP04, COD, lead and iron. Figures 14 and 15

graphically represent the total solids and lead comparisons. Thetotal solids data for these events shows reasonable accuracy whenthe two year total of 1862 lb (845 kg) is compared to the predictedvalue of 1640 lb (7^5 kg). Individual events within this periodhowever, show a substantial variation between predicted and monitoredvalues. For example, the first three events in 1976 show largevariations in the predicted versus monitored total solid values.

61

Page 74: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

co

cfO

sOp»»

co

-a-co

i

4)

3A3

2

O

cm

<u —-OfO

-a<u

•Mo•—TJ

-Q 0)^* L-

o.•t

-a*OQ.K_fD3•M

u<

J3•— "D

<Dm 4-1

V) o-o •—•-> T31— <D

o J_

(/) Q_

•o0)oc0)Q.(/) 03

3 3CO 4-1

o<

-a<u

J3 4-1— u„ "O

(A <U

XI L.

•— o.t—o(A

_(0•M ^—

(0

h- 34->

o<

0)*JCOQ

CO CO

o d

egop^o

p«.

o la p».»- o -a-o

-3-

r- o -a- ooo o o o LTVo

-D<U3C

Coo

r- -TCM O

i- m n m m no o o «- o o coop»»

o so coo •*> *-

O *

so p»»SO SO

-a- co p««.

co co p».co oCO CM

-a- r*. -a- o laCM i- cm »- oo

CM LAsO «-

CM o o r*. sO OO r— CO co OO a- CM o o 1—-a- »* CO CO CM SO -a- -a- CO ^™ CM

o CO oo CO o CO CM CO -a-CO CO oo •*» p*. \o LO vO -a-

la -a- oo co cm r>» «— la p-^

CO oo LA CO LA CM sO

r^ LA CO -a- -a- OO LA 00 OO LA CMoo -a- LO

CO*~ <*"* CM CO CO CM CO *~

co co cm cm -a-S i- >- vO oop-* laCM «-

p»* P^^v P*»OO 00 O CO LA OO OO *-x o r+ P»» OO 00 O Po-»— CM CO LA r— CM CM OO t— OO 1— r— T— CM CM CO CO 1—

sO P^ P^ CO OO CO CO COOOsOsOsOsOsOsOsO

-a-LA-a-

ox.a

T3 "0) «nL. 4-)—4-> C— 3Co oE —

L.4-» 4-1

o <uz s:*

+->

o

62

Page 75: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

TJCDMo•—TJ

-O 0)•— U

Q_M

-3"

O0_r-

_(D3+J

O<

jQ TJ^ o4-»

a uin •—TJ TJ•— CDr— uO a.t/>

TJa)tjcCJ —a nj

m 33 MCO U<

TJCJ

jQ Mf— o

•»•> TJ

(/> <U

TJ L.•— 0_w—o(/I

^_<tiM t—o <U

r- 34-1

O<

0)+JfOo

OO

PAO

-3" 00la la

CM CM

COoo

-3" CMvO vO

r-. cmCD \C CM so

-3"

vO

O i- «— CM i- i—

TJ0)3C

CMCA »-

.- LA

LA PA CM OO CM CO r-. r>O O -3" vO O PA OO »—

CM «- O

oo-3"

pa -3-

»- PALA

«- CM oo r«. NO PA \o CMO PA CA OO CA CM*- oo o

CA -3"

o o

CM LA O O r-. ,— CA PAO OO *— o PA i— *— Oo •-

PA PAoo oo

LA CM OCM LA VO

PA VO-3" CA

LA COCM

CMVO

CM

00

CM CMPA PA

CA O CA vOCM «- PA

CA -3" r»» vO

OO -3" —-3"

CM O CM CAPA CM «— *—

en

-3"

LA-3-

OX

TJ "<D if)

L. 4-1

o —4-> C— 3Co o

L.

4-) 4-1

O 0>

PA oo PA PA -3- to*— CM CM CM CM 4-»^ \ \ "V. \ o

vO

CO 00«— CM

oPA

PALA »-

LA OOCM CM

CA >^ OCA «- CO »-

OO 00 CA CA CA I— \D l-» l->» OO CO OO 00 CACAsOvO4-1

o

63

Page 76: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-o<D

3C

T3Cfo

vO

i

<u

-a:

3fO

2

3

0)

o

CM

_QfO

o<DMu

-o_Q <DBB 1_

Q.ACO1_

,

fO

34->

o<

o<u4->

o•—-DV

JQ 1_"- Q-

9k

TJfU

<u-J

^—fD

3Mo<

-o0)Wo

-oJ3 <Df— u

Q.MQO<_>

j ,

fD

34->

O<

<DMfDQ

vO -3"*- oo

vOvO

OCM

O CO

CM CM

-3-

CM

-3"

cx\

CMCM

«- -3-vOCM

VO i-\0 vO

O-a-

CO CM«- CM

vO LTV-3-

CM

CO CMCM

•— r^ ooi— i— CM

O N M OOCO C"V »— t— CM

vOvOvOvO S N CO OO

fA 4 HCM CM -M^ S O<T\ a\ i—

LTV

oX-O

<U </)

U 4-1

o —*-> c— 3Co oE —

i_4-> 4-1

o <u

OJ4->

o

64

Page 77: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q nLLI HIDC Ha ->00 n< ^1X1 O^ o

Cru

-3"

2

in

its

O

D<U+J

a.EOo

1/1

1/1

!_

0)

>

X)<D1_

31/1

TO

3cn

(sB>( = f9t70 x sq|)

san 'sanos nvioi

65

Page 78: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q Qin LUcc h-=) DCO 0-

< ?LLI oI> oI*

00CN

CO

COCM

CO cr>

J2zLU

>LU

CCoI-

oc

-3-

cr>

i

CO

(0

2

-ofO

CO

ocuM3Q.EOu

in3inL.

0)

>

COu3in

«DCO

LTV

COU3

(sB>) =wo x sq|)

san aval

66

Page 79: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

The total solids comparisons of Figure 14 show five storms which

account for the majority of the differences between the predicted and

actual data. These storm events occurred on 6/18, 7/28, and 7/30/76

and 6/11 and 8/13/77- The first two dates show the model to over-

predict while the remaining dates underpredict the measured loadings.

The event which occurs on 6/8/77 represents the first nonwinter

monitored event of 1977 and thus, is subject to the initial pollutant

estimation of zero pounds preceeding this event after total washoff

from a storm of 0.54 inches (1.3 cm) in one-half hour. The first two

events of 1977 are reasonably close to the measured and reflect the

accuracy of this total washoff assumption.

The suspended solids loadings of Table 27 show the total pounds dis-

charged for monitored events to be 570 lb (259 kg) and the predictedto be 658 lb (299 kg). Suspended solids data was not collected for

events that occurred on 7/30/76 and 8/13/77- Zero predicted suspendedsolids result when the surface total solids load is less than 6 lb

(2.7 kg) as in events of 6/8 and 6/10/77-

The total phosphorus loads (TP04) listed in Table 27 show very closecorrelation with the total monitored load being 1.03 lb (0.46 kg)

versus a predicted load of 0.86 lb (0.39 kg). Small variations are

present in the individual storms. Similar trends are found for COD,

lead and iron loadings. The lead data is graphically presented in

Figure 15 where those events that show the greatest variation are

the result of the large differences in monitored and predicted total

solids. Table 27 shows the monitored totals to be 5-17 lb (2.34 kg)

and the predicted to be 4.55 lb (2.06 kg).

Mi Iwaukee Hwy. 45

The Milwaukee Hwy. 45 monitoring data contains 18 events which will

be compared to the predicted values in the following figures. A

total of 39 events were simulated during 1976 and 1977 with the

results of the model output presented in Appendix G (pages 155-162).

Table 28 presents data for total and suspended solids, lead, iron,

COD and TP0. , while Figure 16 and 17 present graphical comparisonsof total solids and lead. The 1976 simulation period uses the K^

value associated with nonconstruct ion , 172-5 lb/mi-day (48.6 kg/km-day)

,

while the 1977 simulation period (construction) requires a K1 of

367.7 lb/mi-day (103.6 kg/km-day) as determined in Section II. Usingthese K-\ values for the appropriate years, the predicted total solidsfor the two years was 63,478 lb (28,794 kg) while the measured valueswere 55,024 lb (24,981 kg). A few of the individual runoff eventswithin the simulation period show large variations, but the overallaccuracy of the model is relatively good.

67

Page 80: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

r--

ca

cCO

MOr-».

en

la-a-

x<u

fD

2

inM

in

"Oo

COCM

-aa>4->

o•—TJ

-O <Df— 1_

Q_•l

-a-oQ_h-

_fD

34-»

O<

-Q "O— <L)

4-J

•> ain •—TJ T3•— <U§— l_

O Q_in

-a<u

-ac<u t—ci- fDin 33 4->

CO o<

-o<D

JO •M-— O

ft oin 0)

"O l_•— Q_*—Oin

,__

fD+J i—O fD

I- 34-1

o<

a)*JfDQ

t- LA-3" CO

la roCM i- 00

r>. o LA MOo «-LA-a-

laMO

in o> N in ia r-CM MO OO <— CO OO

CA

ca -a- ca o •— vo ca la CM t- r-CM CM

t— vO MO CA »—

<D3C

CO

MO-3- o

vDCM CM

oo CAvOO CA o

MO-3-

CMLACM

OCM

LA LA-3"

-3"

CAO -3"

CAOO MD

LA o "- O o O CM *- o O -3" vO O O — CA — CM -a-

MO CA CALA i— OOCO r- LA

i— CA

CA O O -3".— r-«. LA »—_a- r-%. -3- ca

r- CM *—

-

r*» CO CA CA -3- vO -3- CA r^ CA LAo O vO vO r>» CM CM r^ vO -3- MDLA CA CA CM CA -3- MO -3- CA CM vO

LA r*« """ -3* CA MDCA

MO CO OO i- CACA LA CM-3- —

r-^LA«-M0OCMLA«— »- CMCMOOCA»— CACACALAOOr- COMOMOO-3-»— CO»—

•—CM CA MO

00CM-3-

CM -3" CA MOO (->. LA «—-3- CA CO -3"»- CM «-

CACM

CACM

LAMO

LA

oCM

LACACALA

ca -3- r-^ co -a- -3- f*^ -a- r>» t-OLAOOOCOOCOMOCMCAcm ca «— «— ca«— r^r^coco

CA -3" CM i— CA »—

-a- mo

CA ooCM

r^. ca voO CA -3"-3- oo -a-r-^ »- la

r-«.

CANo

MOooooLA

M0

CA-3-

CA

t- O Or-» r*». cmca -a- «—CM CM

CACMO-a-

O O0 CACA CA O-3" -3" «-CM CA i—

CM CA O-a- -3- r>*r^. »- mo

mo oo

O CA -3" CA OO CACA CM CM -3" oo r-*-3" •— LA OO CA «-

«— CA -3" CA CA

-3-

CMOLALA

OO 00»- CM

MO

oCA

-3"

LA i-LA 00CM CM

CACA *-

fD

CA

cnc

L.

3"O

to cn

i_

L- II

3O -3"

O LAo -a-

>>o4->— X>— J34-J —ofD

c in

O -m

4J CO 33»- O4J •—in l.

C 4-1

o a)o 2:fD

00 «- r- CMoCA

r«» 00 00 00 00

-3- LA LA MO

CACALAvOvOvOvOvOvOvO^O

68

Page 81: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

LA vO LAOO

CA O COvo ca o

-3-

CMCA

oCM

LA CMfA r-

CA LA«— LA T^ -3-

vO

ca r^-3" fA

O vOr- CO

o r^ o oo ca CA LA -Too -3- «"" fA *— CA r^. —vO CM -3- r— o O r— LACM r— r— LA -3- CA o LPv

CM '— ' 1

co1_

<

CMCA vD

CM1^.

LACA

CAOO

OO-3"

CAO-3--3" CA

oo oo oo oo oo oo OO oo OOLA

CACA

OO OLA

CA CMCM

OCM

ca-3-

LA\0

OO -3" o OOOO

-3- r^- CM-3"

fACA CA

CMLA

CACMca

"O

a;

CA vo vO LACM o CM CA -3-

r^ -3"

oooo o LA

CACAO

1^CA

OvO CA

ovO

r--

-a-

«- CM vO O T CA -3" CM •- o o CM O — CM r-» «- LA LAvO

<

1^.

vOCA-3"

vO OCM

-3"

OvOLA CM vo

OOO

o-3-

o-3"

oCA

oCM

OOO

oOO

ovO

oLA

OCM VO

vO — CM O CM •- -3- -3" o O oo r-» O o — -3- CM CA CALA

r-.

CA

CDC

-Q

OOO

"O

CO

o<

COo

LA vO CM vOCA r^ CA r-LA vO -3" CA

CA LA -3"

LA r-~ OO-3" oo o

LA OOOO-3"

l^~CM

CA CA CMLA -3- O-3- CM -3"

OLA r-.

CA

vO

oo ooi— CM

OCA

vO

LA «—

oo oo

oCM

LA COLA CA-3" LA

LA COCM CM

OO OO CA

CACA

1^CA

O OOVO LAi— LACM CM

1^-3"-3"

CAVO-3"

OCAOO

LA CA VOO CM CMP^ VO CA

LA COLA CACO vO

CACA r-

ro

-3"^ "v.CA LA

LA

vO

CAVO CM1^ CA«— CA

LA

vO vO

-3" vOca vOLA LA

vO CO — -— CM

vO vD vO vO

OLAvO

OCA

vO

LAOCM

CAvOoovO

x> ena) .*:

s_

L- II

O -3-

O LAO -3"

>-o+J— X>._ _a+-> .

oCO

c to4J

M CO 3

L- O+j ._in i-

c +j

O <Uo 2:CO

d)

O

69

Page 82: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

MEASURED

P5 COMPUTED

6/18 7/28 8/5 8/14 8/25 8/27

1976 STORM EVENTS

c/) g, 13000

1000

MEASURED

YA COMPUTED

5/4 6/5 6/5 6/6 6/8 6/11 6/17 6/27 6/30

1977 STORM EVENTS

Figure 16. Measured versus computed total solids atMilwaukee Hwy. k$ , 1976 and 1977.

70

Page 83: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

< sLU

in

oX

12.00

11.00

10.00

9.00

8.00

7.-00

o<LU-1

O)

II

ID

bX

6.00

5.00

J».00

.a 3.00

2.00

1.00

.00

measured

15 computed

\i K6/18 7/28

s

b Id ig

7/30 ' 8/5 ' 8/14 ' 8/25

1976 STORM EVENTS

8/27 9/9 9/19

MEASURED

N COMPUTED

5/4 6/5 6/5 .

' 6/6 ' 6/8 ' 6/11 6/17 6/27 6/30

1977 STORM EVENTS

Figure I7 Measured versus computed lead at Milwaukee Hwy. k5,

1 976 and 1 977.

71

Page 84: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Nashville I -kO

A total of 18 events at this site were used to compare the monitoredand predicted quality estimates of the model. A total of kd events

were used in the analysis. The results of the model output for Nash-

ville are presented in Appendix G (pages 163 to I69). The Nashvillesite was affected by construction during the entire 1977 monitoring

period so the K-| value of 3^7-3 lb/mi-day (37-9 kg/km-day) corresponding

to this activity was applied (Section II). A simulation for 1976 was

not performed because only four events were monitored that year.

Table 29 lists the computed and actual values for six parameters, while

Figures 18 and 19 present the total solids and lead comparisons. The

total solids measured for the 18 events totalled 20,273 lb (9204 kg)

while the computed values equalled 23,325 lb (10,580 kg). The TPO^

and COD comparisons show the greatest variation in computed and actual

data. The overall predictions for all parameters, however, are

acceptable.

Harrisburg 1-81

A total of 67 rainfall events were simulated with the predictive proce-

dure at this site with 12 of these events having been monitored for

quality parameters. The 1976 events use the K1 value associated withthe construction aspects of that year while 1977 uses the nonconstruc-tion Type III, K^ . The model output is listed in Appendix G (pages 170

to 130) while Table 30 lists computed and measured values for totaland suspended solids, lead, iron, COD and TPOij. Figures 20 and 21

present lead and total solids values in graphical form. The monitoredtotal solids for the period was 3655 lb (1659 kg) while the predictedload equalled 3689 lb (1673 kg). The remaining parameters are alsoextremely close on a total pounds basis with a few individual eventsshowing large variations. The quality comparisons were much moreaccurate than anticipated, considering the complexity of the drainageconfiguration and base flow conditions at this site.

Denver 1-25

The application of the predictive model to the Denver 1-25 site is

somewhat different because the arid climate and resulting long dryperiods complicated the calculation of a site specific K] value. Themodel calculates a K, value based on the ADT data and associated sitecharacteristics. The model output data is listed in the Appendix G

and shows the calculated K] value to equal 378.9 lb/mi-day (106.

8

kg/km-day). Table 31 lists a few selected parameters comparing the

computed and actual values. Figures 22 and 23 present a graphicalrepresentation of the total solids and lead data. The accuracy ofthe model for this site is poor for all parameters because of thedifficulties discussed in the K] components discussions. Except forsuspended solids, the model consistently overpredicts the measuredvalues totalled for those parameters.

72

Page 85: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-a-o

oo

o-3-

i

>-CU)

(DzL.

O

3

0)J-

T3O

OOCM

<D

JQID

I-

OV)

D<D

"Oc0)

DCO

co vOoo r»»

vo -a-r- CO

CO COeg o o

vo egLTV oocm r->

CO VO -3" •— CO LA O

-o<u

3C

CM •—vO •M

• cO oCO o

o-3-

co-a-

la oo r>- co r-» o CO r— -3-

CM CM LA o CO -3- o oo CM

p^ -a- CM OO -3" LA VO i—

oo

LANo

CO LA COO r- r-o «-

LA LA o oo r-» CM T— r-«. O o o LA r- CO00 -a- -a- -a- r- r«- CM ^ CM CM o T— CO <X>O vO o CO oo co •— CM OO -a- CO CM OO OO

CM vO I— OOCM CM r*» CMCO VO

OO CM LA O r«^ LA o O vOr»» r*^ LA CO f-« co CM CO vOCM CM LA vO oo CM

la «— -a- COco vo o -a->— «— LA CM

CMco

CMooNoo

>- ooo oooo -a-

oo -a-CM i—CO CM

CMCOCM

t- oo co \o la r-. •-cm o -a- la co r^ ooO OO CO OO LA -3" -3"

CM CM >— — CM

CO i— LA i— CO P-*.

-a- o vo vo co «—vO vO OO CO vO vO

«- CM —

LACMCOCOCM

CO LALA VOLA CM

VO -3" LALA CO O,- ,- vO

CO vO -3" vO-3" -3" -3" OOCO CM CO -3-i— i- CM i-

VO CMr^ -a-CM

OO O LA 00n <n vo•— LA CO

oo r-- lan o\ inCO LA LACO

CO

CMoCM

r^r^.-v

<u CM4J CM<T3 1O ^— CM

CM CM00 CO -3" CO CMCM t- »— v- CM

COCM

-3-

CMLACM

-3" -3" -^ vO vO vO vO vO vO nO

LA vO>% *-* *»s *s.CO CO CO CO

CO CO -3* -3"

^ ^Z ^Z \OO CO

vO CO

OO CO

-3-

LA-3-

OX

XI

-o ••

<U </>

i- +j

O —•M C—i 3Co oE —

l_

o o

73

Page 86: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

0)

O CM-3"

CO-3"

^ i- «*>r>«. vo o o

CMOOvO CM

-3" CMLTV vO

OvO

r-. i— ooCO OO CM

CO Oin co

-o

o.

CMCO

-3" i- -3" CMCO LTV

COCO

VOCM

co -a--3-

r^» vo co •—CM T- -3"

r-> voCM

en

voco

co

-D0)3C

COo

oo

oi

a)

>JZ

1_

o

3

1_

OOCM

CO

I-

<

0)

COc»

00O vO -3"

la-3-

coo-3- oo LTV

ooo

oooo

CMCO

ooLA

vO COO oOO CM

CM-3"

vOO

CMr^* CM o oo CO

COr^- -3"

-3-r*. vO

-3"LO o r~ -3" -3- vO

COvO oo OO

vOCM

ooco ooLA co

vOCM

-3"

coo r-r- O COo co vo LA

-3-

LAo

vOCMo

LA OO CO4 vO vO

-oa)

a.

CM CO CM CM O y- r~ CM O «-

coLA

-3"

CM

CO

CO

CO

3+J

O<

-a

4-1

o

•a<L>

l_

a.

COCM CM

CMCM ^ OO CO LA

O O CMLA

LAO vO-3"

<AO OO CMLA

CM-3"

OOOO

COCO

ooo

vO

CM *r O O o -3" — -3" — -3- O O O O O <- o o -3-

CM

OOOCOvOCMLAr^r--3-vO CO'— COvO COLAvO cocococOvOOOvO

o CO CO o-3" oo LA r^-3" LA r*. CO

QOO

f0

34->

o<

CO LA -3- CO OO •— CO LA LA i— O -3-

oo -3" vO LA r*. LA CO ^-« ^ LA ^ coLA CO T— vO CM 1^ CO -3" CM

<0Q

r»>.

CMCMI

*- CM OO CO -3" OOCM CM CM •— «— «—

Ol_*:

II

-3-

OO -3-

CM LAKo -3"

OX-Q

o ..

oo <u «/)o 1_ Woo o •—CO +J C

•— 3co OE •—

CMCM

COCM

-3-

CMLACM

vO vO vO vO vO vO vO

LA vO

OO OO

CO CO -3- -3" vO CA

S S S s s \OO OO OO OO OO CO

O 0)

+J

o

Ik

Page 87: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

^^fck^%^B»!^Bkito

S2S33S3333S•

<*

o-3-

i

a>

Vt

at

o«/>

m4-1

O

0)4-)

3O.EOuVI

3«/>

L.

0)

>

a>u

<A(0

4)

CO

3

ooo<<*

ooinCO

ooo00

ooinCM

o oo oo inCM »-

(S6>| = f9f'nxsq|)

sanosnvioi

ooin

75

Page 88: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q QLU LL!

DC

CO<LU

1-^

oi

<u

ru

TJ

<u+J3Q.eouVI3(/)

J_

0)

>T3d)l_

3</>

<D

(U

(T»

3cn

(s6>| = frgfo x sq|)

avan

76

Page 89: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 30. Model results for Harrisburg 1-81, 1976 and 1977

Total

Actualsolids, lb

PredictedSuspendedActual

sol ids, lb

PredictedTP0A, lb

Date Actual Predicted

5/16/76 189 373 20 83 0.27 0.56

7/7 227 627 86 164 0.27 1.10

7/7 1344 1427 509 420 3.13 2.87

9/10 204 287 11 55 0.19 0.37

10/20 632 312 21 63 1.97 0.43

4/24/77 337 37 56 0.22 0.00

6/6 30 18 0.6 0.01 0.00

6/9 53 38 0.4 0.004 0.00

6/14 275 201 8 27 0.07 0.19

6/17 105 63 5 0.04 0.00

6/25 92 157 19 13 0.11 0.09

6/25 167 149 31 10 0.15 0.08

Total 3655 3689 7*7 535 6.43 5.64

COD, lb Lead,

lb I ron , 1 b

5/16/76 ;V 0.04 0.12 0.62 3.62

7/7 20 55 0.06 0.23 4.06 7.17

7/7 * 26 0.61 0.56 20.86 18.37

9/10 21 26 0.06 0.09 0.52 2.41

10/20 77 28 0.35 0.10 2.11 2.15

4/24/77 29 4 0.09 0.00 1.95 0.00

6/6 2 2 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00

6/9 2 4 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00

6/14 13 18 0.06 0.05 0.14 1.20

6/17 6 6 0.03 0.00 0.11 0.00

6/25 10 14 0.03 0.04 0.61 0.59

6/25 33

2T2

13

f70

0.05

1 .40

0.03

1 .22

0.95

31.97

0.48

Total 36.59

Note: *Not monitoredMetric units : lb x 0.454 = kg

77

Page 90: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

2 2

8 S-j *.< oK- xO </>

I- £

1900-

1700

1500-

1300-

1100-

900-

700-

500'

300<

100'0'

500-

| MEASURED

!5 COMPUTED

ll 1 I i?_5/16 7/7 7/7 9/10 10/20-21

1976 STORM EVENTS

MEASURED

Va COMPUTED

6/14 6/17 6/25 6/25

1977 STORM EVENTS

Figure 20. Measured versus computed total solids atHarrisburg l-8l, 1976 and 1977.

78

Page 91: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q <*

_i ox

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

.00

I-8 •'<

i1 —

r

5/16 7/7

| MEASURED

5 COMPUTED

9/10 10/20-21

1976 STORM EVENTS

Q II

< «•LU ID_J *.

o

.09-

MEASURED

£ COMPUTED

6/14 6/17 6/256/9

1977 STORM EVENTS

6/25

Figure 21. Measured versus computed lead at Harrisburg l-8l,

1976 and 1977.

79

Page 92: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 31. Model results for Denver 1-25, 1976 and 1977.

Total

Actual

sol ids , lb

PredictedSuspendedActual

solids, lb

PredictedTP0Z,, lb

Date Actual Predicted

8/2/76 7*1 20 361 1.03 0.00

9/25 529 443 370 91 0.86 0.68

9/26 2293 1437 1652 717 3.12 2.91

V1 1/77 756 211 566 0.68 0.15

4/12 389 65 248 0.43 0.00

4/15 733 286 501 0.77 0.32

4/19 1628 512 927 134 1.55 0.83

5/7 421 732 324 273 0.45 1.33'

6/6 119 355 79 35 0.15 0.48

6/9 149 226 79 0.15 0.19

6/23 64 210 31 0.15 0.15

7/5 1823 6548 1366 3937 2.66 14.41

7/20 807 1540 445 782 0.92 3.15

7/24 235 1420 122 707 0.25 2.88

1/15 329 1113 192

7263

513

7189

0.49 2.19

Total 11016 15118 13-66 29.67

COO, lb Leac1, lb 1 ron , 1

b

8/2/76 302 279 0.63 0.06 13.72 0.00

9/25 213 361 0.72 0.49 13.81 3.68

9/26 700 553 3-53 1.51 62.32 23.16

V1 1/77 317 316 0.81 0.26 17.66 0.00

V12 179 288 0.36 0.11 9.71 0.00

V15 312 331 0.79 0.33 18.49 0.61

V19 738 374 1.69 0.56 36.61 5.03

5/7 170 4-17 0.57 0.79 10.28 9.36

6/6 50 344 0.13 0.40 3.06 1.55

6/9 120 299 0.13 0.27 2.90 0.00

6/23 40 316 0.05 0.26 1.26 0.00

7/5 590 1539 1.18 6.72 38.94 123.33

7/20 387 573 0.84 1.61 14.29 25.19

7/24 108 549 0.26 1.49 3.31 22.84

7/25 112

4133"

490

7029

0.30 1.19 6.07 16.82

Total 11.99 16\ 04 252.43 231.97

Metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

8q

Page 93: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q nLU LUcc i-D Doo 0.

< ^LU O:> o

</»

LU

>LU

cc

o00

r»t^

(O

05

c

vO

en

LACMI

0)

>ca)o

CD•M

aECo

in

Dif)

1_

(U>

(L)

1_

in

ro

CM

d)1_

3D1

o o oo o ocr\ vO c\vD NO VO

O o oo o oo r-» -3-vO CM CM

oo\o

(sB>) = frg^O * sq|)

sarios~iv±o±

81

Page 94: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

o QUl UJcc 1-

D D</) CL

< 2UJ Os o

H

LDCM

r^.

<*CM

r*

oCM

r>.

T3c

in CD

r>.

cr>

CO —CM

»CO LA

CM1

Oi

CO

>c

CO (U

COCO MH fD

Zr*. Ul 73

LO >HI

(0

0)

'o cc •aCN o cu

d> H •M

^ CO 3Os- r^

r^

Q.E

o> Olo ^ Ot-

fc

^ CO

r-

in

3in

CM a>t~ >^ a

CU1_

r- 3^ in

«tf CO

<u

COCM

.

aCM

CDLO l_CM 3O

Li.

CM

00

i—

r

Too oo

(sB>| = t7gt7'OXsq|)

QV3T

82

Page 95: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Dallas 1-45

The predictive procedure was applied to another study area independent

of the subject project. The rainfall record and monitoring data wereused as an indication of the models ability to predict pollutant loads

from a site which was not used to develop the model parameters. This

site will then serve as a verification of the model for a Type I site.

The model used the ADT of 33,000 to calculate a Kj value of 73-5lb/mi-day (20.7 kg/km-day) . The simulated rainfall record for 1977

contains 12 rainfall events with 8 events sampled for various qualityparameters. Appendix G (pages 1 89 to 192) lists the model output for

these events. Table 32 provides the monitored and predicted compari-sons while Figure 2k and 25 present total solids and lead values.

The monitored total solids load equalled 468 lb (212 kg) while the

predicted value was 627 lb (285 kg). All of the remaining computedparameters generally over-predicted except COD. These over-predictionsare related to the methods used to determine total flow volume for

this site. Because the detailed hydraulics data for this sitewas not available at the time, individual flow records were estimatedassuming 90 percent of the rainfall resulted in runoff (Q/R = 0.9).This estimation has a significant impact on events that occurred on7/21 and 8/28 where 90 percent of the total variation between predictedand monitored total solids occurs.

if the data as calculated by an average Q/R is used for evaluation,and two listed events are dropped, then the model can be consideredverified for a Type I site. As further data becomes available, theremaining site types can be similarly verified.

MODEL LIMITATIONS

The ability of this predictive procedure to represent the runoffprocess from various highway systems will be determined in futureapplications. The predictive procedure or model is a tool forevaluating the effects of increased traffic, changes in the highwayconfiguration or other design aspects on the loading of solids orother constituents to the receiving water.

Because of the complex interactions of rainfall, runoff and trafficon a highway, the predictive model has certain limitations whichmust be recognized before its use can be fully evaluated. The mostobvious limitations are as follows:

1. The model assumes the highway area to be uniformlycharacterized by the three site types that are listed.Significant variations in a site may have widely varyingresul ts .

83

Page 96: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 32. Model results for Dallas 1-45, 1977.

Total sol ids, lb Susperided solids, lb COD, lb

Date Actual Predicted Actual Predicted Actua' I Predicted

6/15/77 56 23 10 9 39 10

6/23 23 74 2 36 27 20

7/9 55 79 19 38 27 21

7/21 172 309 112 161 157 68

7/26 62 65 26 31 38 19

7/27 49 13 24 4 20 8

8/14 25 15 7 5 21 8

8/28 26 48 4 23 16 15

Total rar 52T 20? W 345 169

Lead, lb I ron , lb

6/15/77 0.07 0.10 0.44 0.93

6/23 0.10 0.39 0.30 1.70

7/9 0.06 0.42 0.21 1.77

7/21 0.56 1.71 2.79 5.23

7/26 0.17 0.34 0.98 1.56

7/27 0.13 0.05 0.61 0.78

8/14 0.05 0.06 0.16 0.81

8/28 0.04

1 .18

0.25

3.32

0.11

5.60

1.32

Total 14.10

Metric units: lb x 0.454 = kg

84

Page 97: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

CO (/>

9 i?-i

ii

o <*

_i ^< oI- XO </>

400 —

300 —

200 —

100

| MEASURED

I5 COMPUTED

6/15 6/23 7/9 7/21 7/26 7/27 8/18 8/28

1977 STORM EVENTS

Figure 2k. Measured versus computed total solids at Dallas \-k5, 1977.

85

Page 98: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

o

1.90 -

1.70 -

1.50 -

1.30 -

~ 1.10</>

0.90 -

3 0.70 -

| MEASURED

^ COMPUTED

6/15 6/23 7/9 7/21 7/26 7/27 8/18 8/28

1977 STORM EVENTS

Figure 25. Measured versus computed lead at Dallas 1-45, 1977,

86

Page 99: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

2. The predicted pounds of total solids washed off during a

rainfall event are dependent upon the model prediction ofthe surface load at the start of the storm. If the surfaceload is underestimated, the pounds discharged will be low.

3. The use of average runoff rate to remove surface pollutantsis the quickest and easiest method. Peak runoff intensitiesduring the runoff hydrograph may be more accurate, but aretoo complex for this procedure.

k. Long dry periods and overlapping storms present predictiveproblems in determining the prestorm surface load.

5. Construction activities are difficult to simulate unlessmonitoring data is available to determine K^ values.

87

Page 100: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION V

RECEIVING WATER IMPACT

The intended use of the predictive procedure eventually may involve thedetermination of the impact of highway runoff on a receiving body of

water such as a lake or stream. The complex determination of theresulting water quality is beyond the scope of this analysis, however,the relative comparison of urban runoff to highway loads can be used

to evaluate the anticipated impact.

ANNUAL HIGHWAY LOADS

In order to compare the impact of highway runoff with other pollutantsources, the data collected from the monitoring program at the five

sites has been reduced to an average pounds (kg) of pollutant per acre(ha) of contributing area per inch (cm) of runoff. This data \s

summarized in Table 33 for nonwinter conditions at all sites. Theunit lb/ac-in. of runoff allows the comparison of different types ofdrainage areas with different perviousness and runoff characteristics.Other units of this table include concentrations in mg/1 and loadingsin pounds per acre (kg/ha).

In order to generate an annual load for the monitoring sites, the

weighted average annual rainfall volume for the sites was calculated as

approximately 32.5 inches (82.5 cm), and the percent of imperviousnessas a weighted average was approximately 34 percent. Using this data,approximately 12 to 14 inches (30-36 cm) of runoff will be generatedduring the nonwinter periods of the year over these sites on an

average basis. The average drainage area size is 43.5 acres (17.6 ha).

The data of Table 33 provides the Ib/acre-in. (kg/ha-cm) of runoffcolumn so that the annual load from the highway system can be expressedas a yearly load as shown in Table 34.

Table 34.. Yearly highway runoff loads.

Pollutant loading, Pollutant loading,

Parameter lb/acre- in. runoff 1 b/acre-yr

TS 260 3,380SS 59 767B0D

55.4 70.2

Pb 0.22 2.86Fe 2.3^ 30.4COD 33 429

metric units: lb/acre x 1.12 = kg/halb/acre/in. x 0.441 = kg/ha/cm

88

Page 101: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Table 33. Summary of highway runoff quality data forall six monitoring sites - nonwinter 1976-77.

Pol lutantconcentration, Pol lutant loading, Pollutant loading,

Parameter mg/1 Ib/ac-event lb/ac- in. runoff

TS 1.1*7 51.8 260

SS 261 14.0 59

VSS 77 3.7 17

TVS 242 9.4 55

B0D5

24 0.88 5.4

TOC 41 2.1 9.3

COD 147 6.9 33

TKN 2.9 0.15 0.68

TN 1.1 0.07 0.26

TPO^ 0.8 0.05 0.18

cr 386 13.0 88

Pb 0.96 0.06 0.22

Zn 0.41 0.02 0.04

Fe 10.30 0.5 2.34

Cu 0.10 .0056 0.02

Cd 0.04 .0017 0.009

Cr 0.04 .0028 0.009

Hg 3.22 x 10"3 5-9 x 10-7 7.3 x 10- 2*

Ni 0.02 0.27 2.25

metric units: lb/ac x 1.12 = kg/ha

lb/ac-in. x 0.441 = kg/ha-cm

89

Page 102: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

The yearly loads listed above are generalized for 13 inches (33 cm) ofrunoff per year. Similar calculations can be made for any of theparameters listed in Table 33.

IMPACT EVALUATIONS

An early task of the subject project was to sample a small receivingstream (Pine River) near the Harrisburg I

— 8 1 site prior to, duringand after a rainfall event. The purpose of this effort was to quantifythe effects of the highway runoff on the stream. Samples of both theinstream quality and bottom sediment material were acquired upstreamand downstream of the highway runoff discharge point. Analysis of thesamples showed nearly uniform contamination of the bottom materialfor various parameters which were thought to be sensitive to highwayrunoff. Factors such as upstream sources of highway runoff, residual

effects from construction activities and overall contamination of thestream forced curtailment of further monitoring efforts. Appendix F

contains the results of this sampling effort. Future phases of FederalHighway Administration research will be directed toward the collectionof such data and the quantification of receiving water impacts.

Concentrations and loadings for each parameter are provided in this

section so the user of the predictive procedure can compare the magni-tude of various loads to a receiving body and then evaluate the impactof the highway. Table 33 allows for a comparison of highway loading

data to other pollutant sources affecting receiving water quality in

a number of different ways. The most common (but least accurate)method is comparison of highway runoff concentrations with urban runoff,

industrial, municipal, and nonpoint discharge concentrations.

In order to obtain a suitable average concentration which is represen-tative of the entire country, the data listed in the "Urban StormwaterManagement Technology" publication of EPA is used. This publicationlists average concentrations of stormwater for 15 cities with combinedsewer overflow (CSO) and II cities with storm sewer data. Table 35presents an average of these values for both CSO and stormwater.These values represent the average concentrations for the 11 and 15

cities presenting data.

Comparison of this data with the highway runoff data (Table 35) showthe storm sewer BOD and COD to be almost equal to highway concentra-tions. The CSO data are much higher in concentration as are thesuspended solids data for storm sewers. A simple comparison of con-centrations for these three sources to receiving water shows thehighway runoff constituents to have generally lower concentrationsfor these parameters. Comparisons such as these are inconclusive since

the sampling methods have a significant influence on the magnitude of

the concentrations. The highway data is a result of flow proportionedcomposite samples which reflect the entire discharge period. Other

90

Page 103: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

BOD5

119

COD 265

Total suspendedsol ids 408

Table 35. Average concentrations for combined sewer,storm sewer and highway discharges.

Combined Storm water (15) , Highway,Parameter sewer (15), mg/1 mg/1 mg/1

27 2k

176 147

639 261

values may be the result of discrete samples taken during the first

flush portion of the overflow which would tend to overpredict thecomposite concentration, or discrete samples taken late in the runoff

period which would tend to underpredict the composite concentration.Many other factors enter into the comparison of concentrations. For

purposes of the receiving water impact, however, the runoff concentra-tion may not effect the receiving water. The pounds of pollutantdischarged is a more significant determination. For example, if

discharge A has half the concentration of discharge B, but A has twice

the total flow of B, then both discharges release equal loads to the

receiving body. Thus, concentration alone is meaningless unless some

estimate of flow is available to determine total load and resultingconcentrations in the receiving water body.

A more meaningful representation of the impact potential of various

discharges can be determined by expressing the loads on an annual

basis. This procedure accounts for variation in rainfall, flows and

concentrations of individual events by generating the annual loading.

To overcome these discrepancies the runoff or discharge data is

normalized to the pounds per acre per year values presented previously

in Table 34. A comparison of loads can now be made which better

represents the relative impact potential of highway runoff. Data

available from the literature can then be used to compare various

pollutant sources.

An EPA report (16) entitled, "Nationwide Evaluation of Combined Sewer

Overflows and Urban Stormwater Discharges, Volume III" presents

annual loads for municipal and urban sources which are listed in

Table 36. Since ultimate BOD values were not determined in this

project, a comparison of BOD values between these data sources requires

the transformation of BOD5 highway data to ultimate BOD. The ultimate

BOD value for highway runoff in Table 36 was obtained by assuming

BODc to be 70 percent of the ultimate.

Highway runoff values are significantly lower than published urban

runoff values in all categories listed. Similarities exist between

91

Page 104: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

UltimateBOD

Suspendedsol ids COD

61 50 92

470 6690 938

15.7 186 88

Table 36. Annual loads for highway, municipal and urbanrunoff sources - lb/ac-yr.

Municipal effluent (16)

Urban runoff (16)

Highway runoff

metric units: lb/ac/yr x 1.12 = kg/ha/yr

municipal effluent and highway runoff data for ultimate BOD and COD.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented in this section has been limited to BOD, COD and

suspended solids. These parameters are the only readily availabledata on urban runoff normally published as an annual load. For

purposes of determining receiving water impacts these parameters pro-vide an indication of the impact potential of highway runoff.

Parameters such as lead or other heavy metals, which are normally not

evaluated, may be more significant for highway runoff.

The brief data comparisons of this section indicate that highwayrunoff is similar in loading per unit area for the example parametersto storm sewer discharges but much less significant than combinedsewer loads. Urban runoff loads which contain both storm and combineddischarges exhibit much more impact potential for the three parameters

92

Page 105: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION VI

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Equations were developed relating runoff volume to rainfall volumefor three highway site types as follows:

Type I - urban elevated bridge decks with 100% paved areas

0_ = 0.969 R - 0.019

Type II - urban paved and nonpaved drainage areasQ = 0.470 R 1 .369 dd -0.086

Type III - rural flush shouldered highways= 0.84'; Rl-892 nn -0.654Q = 0.845 R'-w dd

where; Q = runoff volume (inches)

R= rainfall volume (inches)DD = dry days to last storm event

2. Pollutant accumulation rates developed in this project are com-parable to other highway studies.

3. Pollutant accumulation rates are related to traffic using thefollowing equation;

Kt = 0.007 (ADT0.89)

where; K-| = pollutant accumulation rate (lb/mi-day)ADT = average daily traffic (vehicles/day)

4. Total solids showed the highest correlation with other monitoredparameters and is therefore used as the carrier pollutant in the

predictive procedure to estimate 16 other parameters.

5. The wash-off coefficient (K2) used in many surface water qualitymodels and used in this procedure can be written as:

P - P (l-e"K2 r

)

where; P = pounds washed-offPQ = pounds at start of rainfall event

K2 = wash-off coefficientr average runoff rate, in./hr

The wash-off coefficient developed for the three highway site

types used in this study are:

K£ 5.0 for urban elevated bridge decks with 100 percent

paved areas (Type I)

l<2 = 6.5 for urban paved and nonpaved drainage areas (Type II)

K2 = 12.0 for rural flush shouldered highways (Type III)

93

Page 106: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

6. The predictive model is better suited to continuous simulationsusing daily rainfall records covering periods of at least onemonth than design events, due to its inability to predict surfaceloads prior to individual events.

7. Highway runoff shows less impact potential than urban stormwateras measured by BOD and suspended solids.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Verification of the predictive procedure should be continuedusing data from other sites.

2. Measure the actual pollutant buildup on highway surfaces to

determine the relationships between site characteristics andaccumulation rates.

3. Investigate the effects of highway runoff on receiving waters in

a separate, comprehensive study.

k. Investigate the pollutant characteristics of nonpaved runoff forvarious vegetative and side-slope configurations. Additionalhydraulic information from nonpaved areas could lead to thedevelopment of a more sophisticated procedure to predict total

runoff volume in which paved and nonpaved runoff are estimatedseparately.

3k

Page 107: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION VI I

REFERENCES

1. Gupta, M. K. , Agnew, R. W., Gruber, D. A., and Kreutzberger , W.

,

"Characteristics of Runoff from Operating Highways, Research

Report", Volume IV of FHWA Contract No. DOT-FH-11-8600, with

Envirex Inc., Environmental Sciences Division, Milwaukee, Wl

,

July, 1978.

2. Rohlf, F. J., and Sokal , R. R. , "Statistical Tables", W. H. Freemanand Company, San Francisco, 1969.

3. Abbott, J., "Guidelines for Calibration and Application of theUrban Storm Water Runoff Program (STORM)", Preliminary Report:The Hydrological Engineering Center, Davis, California, March,

1976.

k. "Water Pollution Aspects of Urban Runoff", American Public WorksAssoc, FWPCA, Water Pollution Control Research Series WP-20-15,January, 1969.

5. "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater",Fourteenth Edition, APHA-AWWA-WPCF, 1975.

6. Brandstetter , A., "Assessment of Mathematical Models for Stormand Combined Sewer Management", Environmental ProtectionTechnology Series, EPA-600/2-76-175a , 1976.

7. Burgess, S., Horner, R., and Waddle, T., "Review of the Literatureon Water Quality Impacts of Highway Operations and Maintenance",A Study Prepared for the Washington State Highway DepartmentRunoff Water Quality Research Project, 1977-

8. Sartor, J. D., and Boyd, G. B. , "Water Pollution Aspects of StreetSurface Contaminants", Report to U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, 1972.

9. Sylvester, R. 0., and DeWalle, F. B., "Character and Significanceof Highway Runoff Waters", Report to Washington State HighwayCommission, 1972.

10. Shaheen, D. G., "Contribution of Urban Roadway Usage to WaterPollution", Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1975.

11. "Freeway Runoff from the I -90 Corridor", Municipal i ty ofMetropolitan Seattle, Report to Washington State Highway Commission,

1973.

12. "Water Quality Investigations Along SR 90, Phase IV, Municipalityof Metropolitan Seattle, Report to Washington State HighwayCommissions, 1973-

95

Page 108: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

13. Moe, R. D., Bullln, J. S., Polasek, J. C„ Mlculka, J. P., andLougheed , M. J., "Characteristics of Highway Runoff In Texas",Preliminary Draft Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transporta-tion, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and:

Development, 1 977

14. Hub.er, W. C, Heaney, J. P., Medina, M. A., Peltz, W. A.,

Sheikh, H., and Smith, G. F., "Storm Water Management Model

User's Manual Version II", EPA-670/2-75-017, 1975-

15. "Urban Stormwater Management and Technology: An Assessment",Lager and Smith, EPA 670/2-7^-0^0, December 197^-

16. "Nationwide Evaluation of CSO and Urban Stormwater", Manningand Sullivan, EPA 600/2-77"064c, August 1977.

96

Page 109: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

SECTION VI I I

GLOSSARY

Carrier pollutantPollutant exhibiting the highest degree of association with all

other pollutants; used in the model to estimate the quantity ofall other quality parameters.

CSOCombined sewer overflow.

Dry daysThe number of days in which less than 0.05 inches of rain fell

prior to the event under consideration.

Highway lengthThe actual length of highway section in the contributing drainagearea; this is in contrast to curb mile or lane mile, which is a

multiple of the highway length.

JiLThe variable used to represent the rate at which surface pollutantsaccumulate, expressed as pounds per mile - day.

The constant used in the wash-off equation which removed thesurface pollutant load; the wash-off coefficient.

NonpavedThat portion of the highway drainage area that is partially orcompletely pervious.

PavedThat portion of the highway drainage area composed of concreteor asphalt traffic lanes, exit ramps or shoulder areas.

Pre-stormThat period of time prior to the rainfall event under considerationwhich contains the pollutant build-up period, measured in days.

97

Page 110: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q/RRunoff (Q) to rainfall (R) ratio; relates the total volume of runofffrom both the paved and nonpaved portions of the drainage area to

the amount of rain causing the runoff.

Type I

Urban highway site, elevated bridge deck, 100 percent paved with impactbarriers containing each set of lanes.

Type i

I

Urban highway site, mountable curb with paved and nonpaved drainagearea.

Type 1 I I

Rural highway site with flush shoulders, paved and nonpaved runoffthrough ditches.

98

Page 111: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

r-» or-. u_CA* s in

O C !_"U — o 3c u. — ofO 4-> .c

vD 03

r>- 3CA o

CD

enc

<

o cZ O=3 EDC

2

oC3

X -3"— CAo r-»z i

UJ —D_Q. o< <U^

303

2

<

03 01»- c j-

C O 3- — oto *-> s:3C 03

u3TJ

CO

03

s_

o

o"

<4- tf)

4- •> <U

CO1 u3 —' C££ —

— U)-—03 •> <o

o — •*-* cI- 03

<r<noN<niAOcoiALA CM -3- CM O CM LA — CM

-3- ca — CTvcsl — ca cm caCM CA-3" CM O -J- O CA LA

CM

.q ja ja ja .aOOOOOOOOOLAOOOOCMLALA — OO LA — CM OOO00 I^CO LALACM O LAr-»LALALAO-^--a- N (T\ O r-. -3" CA LA

CMLAOCMCMCM — CA -S- O — CM CA -3" CA — O CM -3" O LA — -3"

03 to 03OOOOOOOOOOOOOOLALAI^-LAOr^LAOOrALALACACAOOOOOOOOOLAr>.r^.— CMO — CMOO— -3" O CM CM CM O — CM CMCMCACOCMOOCM-3-OLA — CA

CM VO LA CM CA CAO — LALArACM-3-LAvDCA — CM vO OO CM CA

O vO CA r^ CA — P«^LA —r^LAoooooooovooo cm

-OONNO-vO-CO \D -3" CO OO CO CACO —

r-».<r co — la o -3-

O CA LA CA — CA OUU U J3 J3

CM — -3-LAOOLACACACMr^.<r\-d-COCMr~-.CAvO — CO vJD — LAr~-»OOCMPAOLA

OOOOOOO — CMOOOOOOOOO — ooo —

(0 m id

O — LA\OOOI>-.VOI>».LALAOCAOOOOLALACACALA-3- -3-LA— \D \D CA — CAOCM CAvO — LACAOOCALAOv>D — OOOO OOOOcMCMOOOOOOOOO — OOO —

SOIASO 3" -3" OLAOOOCAOO-3-r^COO CALAOO-3" — CMCMCMCMLA— — N O^i CMCMCMCALA — CMCM

TJ<D3C

CDC

CDCD

CDC

oji_

Eo

c

<u

O)03cn Ec u

03 II

1_-3-

>> LA4J •— CMo

XEO •

s_ C.

n-CD

*

"O TJ =3

0) <1) — ••

4-J c <H CO

f0 •

> )->

»— 03 •

3 4-» "O Co -Q 0) 3

.

O 4-1

ru ra Ou <U t- •—

3 •

1_

+-> «— 4-1 4->

O 03 t/> 0)z > UJ 2:

03 -Q

(1)

4-)

o

99

Page 112: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

3c

coo

-o

cl_

o4J

cOE

CO

c

CO!_

-31

is

0)

3CO

2

I

<

-OfD

V)

c uO 3— o4J -CCOu3o

o

CO

CO 4-J

a: fo

3o

u

OO lAMJ-vO NOvOvDco — cm in o co cm co co co vO -3"

co OCM O r^ r—:r rs, r-» rs o

r-. ocm — CM CM CM — CO

ISCMCMOOOOOO— cncnmiAcocoiALA-Q -OoooooNomoNOmaoo

lAOOOLACnOCOLAvOCOCOCOCOin^•vOOOOO rrmt W\o is. CMCMO NO N O CM —

LAOOOOOOOONO O OMMUM/Mft oooocmlalaoiaooolaiaooOOJ-NMTINlAUM^rsNMLn— vO -a: CM co CM CO LA — CM O O O O — O O — O

-3-COOvOOO— NJ-O COOCMO — CO— CMCO CM -3" O in

enmmooo44en (T\oo oo en en en

O O LAco oo en

o o to o o \o —vOCOOO CT\vO 00 Cn

<t COenco

M- •> 0)

o^s-cc o" occ —

•M c C£ oO — *-" c

u

OOvOCO CTI4--4 (TlLfNO CM CM CO CO CO -3- — On CO \£> O -3* vO \DCOCOCM — OOO — CO — CMOO — OOO — O 3"

ooo — ooooo oooooooooooooo

(0CnLAOOLALAOvOCMCOCO CO CM O O CO

uMnoMniniftMOLftN- iannCMOO — — OO — O — LA

ooo — ooooo ooooooooooooo

NOps CO-3" \D o oS. CA LA CM CM CM CO CO*- Cn — "SW* S.S*, v.S.S.«v. O00O00encnen— — — — — —

PS,

*«s oo en—a- P^CM CM -3" -3- LA CM CM LA — CM CO inN — \\ — N — *«n. >x. S. v^ S. s^ \-3--3i .3-.3, .3--3, .3--3-.3' la la la la vo

100

(0

3c

oo

<u

enc

o

coE

CO

0)en

enc

Ei_4-

4->

4)enro

en Ec u

«D II

s_-3-

>- LA4-1 •

•— CMo

XEO •

L. c«4- • •—

• <D-a TJ 3Q) <0 .— • •

4-1 C CO tn(0 — > 4-1

1— CO •—3 4-> T3 cU -O C) 3r— o U(0 03 Uo 0) E •—

3 •— L.

4-1 »— 4-> 4->

o <D tf) <Uz > LU z:

CO -O

4J

o

Page 113: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

\X> vO CA -3" r-~ — 4 4-<MO- O LrtOMA^- — cm ca o— — — OvOO — — — ca

la \o r». r»- -a- oo — iN N — v£) LA <T\CO I

o -a-o o

2 wO c J-— O 3u. — o

*-> -C03!_

3

O— C£

<u </>

U- C l-

C O 3.- ._ OCO 4-) JCQ£ CO

l_

3o

t/1

CO

XJ

S_

Q

c C o3 —' Ca: —

— in— OJ « <uCO M- .—•. SZ+j c q: oO —^ c

CD —

XI XI XIOtANONMNOM LACO -3" LA OO OO LT\ N (ACM N O CMOOO CA CM — OO vO — VO t^.LA-a- CM CO CO CM -3" OO -3"

I— LA-3"

LAvO — J-NOlAWM ONO — OO O LA LA CM CM

OCALALACAOO — OOLAr^OOOLALACMCMOLALACACA-3-CM-3-CAOCMLAOCM\OOOLAr->.r^CA-^OCMCMCA-3-<sO — 4- O O (A N N O — CA — O O O O O CA LA — CM

O CA CM VO — O CA CA CA — o sin<r ocmcm-3-

r^OO-d-OOOMD-3-— Icaooocaoooo\caca i

CA O O \X> O CA caOO CM -3- CO O CA v£>

I —I CO

X! XI XI XICO-3--3-LA — ONvDMO-f — LA — CM O S-J LTiJ-vOJ-VOCMO — VO — LA P-» CA — CA O CA O O CA CMOOOOO — OOOOOOCMCMOOOOOOOOO —

O -3" LA CM — OP-^CALAr^. cm o cm \o — la i-» ca

O OCM UM/\LA|SIAJ- lf\SOOVD — -3" O O CA — — CM CM O CM

OOO — OOOOOOCMCMOOOOOOOOO

i>»^ o — ncooo o r»>.r^-3-CA caLACO — CM CM CA CAVO CMCMCMCA-3-LALAr-.CA —vO \0 vO vO vfl vO vO vO rvNNrvNNOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOO

XJ<D3c

CDc

o4->

coE

CDCD

CDc

EO!_

<4-

4-1

Oc„

<ucdCO

CD Ec U

CO II

s_

-T> LP,4-1 •

•— CNo

XEo •

!_ c.

M-OJ

XI X) 3<D <U

••

4-1 c CD L0

<n •— > 4-1— CD .—3 4-> X> cu XI CD 3

1

O +J

ra CD Oo 0) b •—

3 •— s_

+j i— 4-J 4-1

o CD CO (L>z > U_l X

1

1 CO -Q

<D4->

o

101

Page 114: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-oCD3C

CO

tj

enc

oMCoE

i

CO

3

2

I

<

-Qro

oc£>sOLi_

,^-s.

ou.>—

*

5 (/)

O c J_^ O 3u. o

*-> JZrou3TJ

.*—*.

r»^» o-.^-» V*^—

(0 \n

u- c v.

cr. o 3•-« • -— o(U 4-» -Ca:

3t>

«)>>ro

TJ

>•J_Q

o:•v.

M- i/f<4- •> (U

o ^—

»

.cc o' o3 >—

^

c0i

i— </>— <TJ^ eo

<TJ «4- *—

N

x:4-> C o: oO — *•—•* cH ro •—

u

co4->

COQ

CMCO

i cr> CACT\OOCACM<r*O-a-00OLA0A O— OLACM — CAOOO — OCM— -3--3"0 M3-3-

CM CM

fONCf\OinONLr\ONMNOOOl/\l/M«Mr\lAOsOCOvO IACO O — (MO — M- OOMNN — r». P-* LA

NM-CTiOOM^NvDOON — laca— O — OO —CM

-3-

ca

OlAOOo r-. la o LA OCM O la o o oo la O

P^ LA O O CM O oooooor--r*.olaoo co o o o u\

cMCMOooooo-a- — LAOocMO-a-cM — cr>— oo —\0CO

CM

-3"

oo

ca vo Ovo r-^co -a- — LAO LAOLACMOOPAvOr^

oco

I I CM -3-CMCM — OCMCACOOA— OOAOCAOOp—a-vovo-3- cr> cnco la r»» oo -a- -3- co -=r r-~

XJ X) -QvO-3--3-CAOLALAOOP^CMCMOLA— CMOOOCMLACMr^o i-^ — mo o— oo — ca— 0-3-0000

: ooooooooooooooooooooo

co

-a-rA

O LA LA O — 1*^ CM CACO LAfA— r^CAP^O-CT LA vO" LA OCM — O -3- — CMCMO— OO — LA CAOOO —

- OOO — OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

\ laco <r —VOCMCMCO CMvOP^.OOCACA-3-LAOOLAr^ CMCA— CM CM CM -3" -NNNN^MMSSSSS^ —"^^^^.^^^^^^W^OOOOOOCO OO OO OO CAO"\0"'»CACAC^O>»CA<7\0,»C»— — — — — —

CACA

uCDOlCOu<v

><

co4-1

Olc

coE4-1

ro

<L>

O)ro

Olc

fO1_

Eo

<uenCOenc

4-)

Eou- •

T3 73 3<D CO «—*-> C COro — >— ro

3 4-» TJU H ID— O 4->

ro ro

O CO E3 —

4J — 4->

O «U t/j

;z > lu

CD

3

ro

>

TJU4-)

ro

E

cro

+- E— o2

II

4-1

<U LA> •

CD CM

>- Xcro •

cCO —TJ3

O (/>

C 4->

c4J 3oC (J

(/) L-

<U 4-1

O <Da r:

ro jQ o

102

Page 115: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-a- la <rv cv\ i oo cm -a- i i i i j'oo moisoo mvoN-s-NssO^NNvO I \DMN I I I I N N CM \D IAOO N N (T» O UM^ —— CM — CM — LT\ CM CM VO CO CM

»— «nu

C 3o o— SZM(0i_

3T3

oooommomou\mNOo

— or

co»*- cc oCD +JC£. CO

u3o

roD

Uo

o^-*x:CCO3 >-' Ca: —

— «n— ro * <dco <+- .^x:•w c a: oo — "-* cI— CD —

1_

cr*vO

CMLTVLf\-a-f>~CMQLAr>.r>^-3- O -3" -3" — LTV Lf\ <r>

CM CO IA moooo r^ cm moCM CM CM — ONJ-mOJ-OOl J-OLT\

CO CO CO{noorNooi/\Lf\iArsNOLr\f*Mr\<MmUWOONNN-aMANOON-3-

OfONOO LALAOO N Lf\ rvrsOOOvDONNOvOSvDO— <r — o cm <r — -3-0— \o o co -a- cm — mo — co — ro — r-^m

CM CM —

LAvO N — CM — CO — LnLOCOCM-3-L/\CO— CMvO— — — COo cxv — co -a- oo o

I^ l/\M0 O I CM — CO— CM un CM I CM C7\ vO

o o o o o o o

i iioo — oooooLnovo-a- — n oni i i cm -3" co — n N J- cs cm nr^j- n

ooooooooooooo

XI XI— o in — vo o vo u-\ -r co cr* rsc^vD m — cm oo cr\ cr\ o cm ooO — OOO — SCOOPO- OCMCMOOCMOOOOCM — WOoooooo — oooooooooooooooooo

CO CD CO\DOOMAif\Lr\Mvo-a-ooovDiAvooof<KrLAu> — i^cm — o r-»O4-OO--3- mM-N\OOSv0Om-OOmmCM»\00Moooooo o — oooooo oooooooo

— o r^oo o — -a- o moo o wco rsoo o -a- looo co-3" — — — CM N CM IA- — CM CO — — CM CM rOLfMf\- CMCM — CO —.3- -a- -3- -a- -a- -a- -a- LrvurvLnLALAvOvOvo iv r^oo oo oo co oo en <n en

o0)

3c4-J

coo

enc

enCOenc

o1_

M-

4->

OC_

<uO)CO

en Ec U

CO II

1_

-3"

>- LT\4-> •

•— CNo

XEO •

<_ c.

M-CD

TD TJ 3<D CD •— • •

4-J C CD in

CD •— > 4->

CO •

3 4-1 X) c(J -O <D 3

.

o 4->

<TJ it! OO CD E •—

3 •— L.

•M #—

.

+j MO CO in <u2 > LU z:

I CO XI

CD4J

o

103

Page 116: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-o<u3C

Coo

CA

T3C(0

\Dr-.CA

034->

fO

TJ

Cs_

O

cOE

to

c

LA-3"

>5

<u

3

2

CM

<0)

01

I UO C 3— o oU_ ~ -C

4-1

HJ1_

3o

Q— CCi— —'in

c 3O O._ _c4-1

i_

3•o

>•1-Q

cc"-^

o>

«+- * <U

C O1 O3 —' C

— CO •> fl)

4J C C£ OO — <~' C

I— ro —

ca r*^ o o r-«— MAO M vo r^ooco lamd la o cm cnr^-a- ooco ors<nOMJ^oo-d-wON-a-p^Nirwoooowo (^-t

r»» — CM — cm — CM ca O — CM

O LA LA Lf\ Oo r>. r^ cm o OOOmUMftinO-NNOONmOOOIflOONSNSOvDCM-UMAvDOOOOOo la ca la o cocavo-3-la-3-cacalao\o-3-cm— cor^cAMDCO cm — — — —

CO LA O LA COLrtN lAMA LALACOOLAOOLALAI^CMCALAOCMOOCM

CMI^OOCMLAOCMCM — CACACMLA-3-LALA-3;

VO CA CM O -TCM — MD LA CM O -3" -3" CA 3-OCAOOvDMDOCACM

vD CO — CM -3" — CM MD — CACAr^l^O — -3" O — CMCAsDOCA

LACAOOO OOOSO(*MS|sO-a-OOOvOOir\U\lftM-CA — CMCMCA -3" CO CA-3- — — — CM — CMCMCA CMCALACAOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

CA CM 3"

-3" O O O — LrtNPvOO N — CA CA O — <T LA CMCMCAOOOOOOOOCMCMOO — CMCMCM

OOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

O LA LA LAvO-3" — O O -3"

CMCM CAOLAM3CO LOMnMvOOrs — O O —VD-3- — CM — O— OOOCOLA— CMMDM3-3-r^

OOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

vD

LA CM CM CM CA \ O — -3" C>. M3 — C>» P^. O\ \ ^ \ \ CM-3-CMCMCMCM-3-CMCA— LALA — OO CMCAOOOOO \ss\sssss\s\ss\sss— -3--3--3"-3--3--3-LALALAMD\0MDv0\0\0v0v0v0

T3

3C

CoO

-3"

LA

CM

X

in

c3

104

Page 117: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

oj

3C

en

•acOJ

Cn

OJ

OJ

TJ

CnCi_

o4J

coE

Oc3V-

I

031-

in-4"

OJ

3(0

5

<N

<OJ

x>oj

*— t/>

i_

3 C 3o o o— — JZU. 4-1

OJu3

o— oc^— *—

'

(/)

CD i_ in cm r^oo CT*H- C 3 N-JvDO vOC O o • • • •

•— o— .c CM — vO O -3"

(D +-> _oC ru

l_

3•D

in

>Aro

-a

u

«4- W*4- 0)

C & O3 ^-* CC£ —

— in— OJ <Doj M- --n jz*-> c cn oO —^ c1—03 —

L.

o

J3 UJ3Hv£> CM CM mvDOOOO Wm — oo m

cn

mm — o

-O jQ XI JQcn r-»vo cmo o vo -*

o o o o

o moo inm cm cm -3-

o o cm —

mvO — —\ ^ v» ^r^ r»» r^» r>»

o

o

m-3"

O

enOJ

><

4-1

cnc

o

ojcnOJcnc

OJ1_

EO

3

OJ>

D<U4-1

0J

E4J 4JO tn

OJcn0Jcnc

0)-O 3a) —c OJ

. — >-o 0J

OJ 4-> -O4-» Xt OJ

OJ O 4->— OJ

3 OJ EO 3 •-— i— 4-J

oj oj mC_» > LU

c0J

JZ•M E— o2

II

4-J

ca-ll) m> •

<D CM

>* Xc

a)

TJ3

Uc

0) 4->

o <u

4-1

o

0J -Q O

105

Page 118: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

f-«.

<a oto

•ac03

§c u3— o O

iu — SZ

<a

4JIDu3•a

<0

<0*4-

cCOu

o-3-

I

>JZ(/>

0)

i

<co

JQCO

CO

"O

en O— oec p. %M^ (0

o4-»

<D J-»4- C 3C O o•— —

J=

coE

f0 4-»

CC COu3

u_ •D

\D O -3- -d"la cm vo ca

OO — N-* LAIA-* Lf\OCO— O 00 -3" O \D CA CA CM OOO I I

ca cm ca — CMCM

CA r-*O Lf\ CA\D

\D CACO CACM —

OO CM LA 00

ca — la

fO CO

r^-o la r-* cm ocx) r»«. la r^ ca <r <a cm stno\oocm — <nino — n— oovo— -Jnocmutv

CON.vDvO - N-* *- fON O CA-3" LAvO LA

to

CO

•D

uo

M- CO

u- • co0--».CC O O3'*-' CDC —

•—CO » ()

•m c or oo — >* cI- <o

4)4-1

COO

mooo inCO LA LA CM

LAOO-JOOO-OOSCOOONNNinONOominLftj-ino- oo =r r^ la

LA CA CAOO — r*«. CA-3- — OOO — CMOO OOO

CA LA CM — or^o O -3" LA CM — O LA —

s£> CA vO vOCM — OO CA

OO CM OCM CM VD CA SO CA CA ^T — LA I

00 CA O CMLAvO CM CM

CO CO CO CO CO— — -3" CA LA f»» LA — LALALACALACAvOLAOr"».-3- — CMCM 3-CA OCM — CMCACMOOOOOO — OCMOOOOOO OO — OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOO — CA OO LACA— r^»0 — O— vO CM CM LA LA CAOOLALAO — CM CA-3" CTk-3" CM CM — O CAOOOOO— O OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

VO -3-

r^. cm CMcmio ca la o r>» -a-NNNM \ I — CM CA -3" -3" CO CMCA

***. ^ »»>. \ — CMfA-a-CMCMCMCMCMCMCALAvOr--r^.OOOO ^.^^^v.. — \ *^v *>* ^x \ >v. \ \ \ *>-* >«*— -3--3--a--3--3--sr-3--a--3--S|-LALALALALA\OvO

T3<D

3C

4-J

coo

Eo

-3-

LA

CM

X

• <aT> 3CO r— ••

+J CO in

(TJ > 4->

•— •—3 TJ cO CO 3w— 4-»

CO CO Oo E •—

•— l_*-> 4-> 4-J

o2L LU

CO

CO4->

O

106

Page 119: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

»— tf)

O C 3— o ou. — s:

*j(0u3D

O— or— »— (/>

(D »-U- C 3COO._ _ .c(D 4-»

C£ fO

is pa la la oo oo oLTV — vO Lf\ CA r^. LA

COo I — MvDOO inr^o NOO - OO CO -3* CM —I -C^CMO\DNOlf\ff\0-\Dlf\vON

J- — eg — vO — cm cm Lf\ cm -3" — rois — ca ca cm — cm —

NJ-NOl/MAONvON- f^OOOOOO NOU\J- NON 1A41 ISJT^m-josno^vo o\ooo ooo — laiscavoiacacmca — ca

ISLACM-3-CMCMCACMCACM — O CO CM -3" vO CM — vO — CM CM CM CM CM -3"

3

i-Q

4- in

O—vJCco>o3 s-" CCC —

— in— flj * Q)

c cc oO —>-" C

I— co —l_

4->

N- (*MM N oooN4-oorsir»oo NOir\rslf\NNmj- J-NJ- ISvO -3" OO -3" -3" O O — Mtn-NOtnONvOfM-J-OOMWCTXn-— oa la cm o cm OlAOv0O-mOO4OO o

O LA CA _ __ CA — CO -M-(T»(»\m-ONO-OONN

NN1ANOMOOvO ca ca\o co unco is

Ooo

rsMD

o o la ca o la ois <rv CO vD -a- OO \0

rs ca cm ca caLAvO sO vO CM

u m m ro

cocMCMts-a-\o-^isoo-4-Lrv-a-cMrscr»vocr>cMOcAPAis--so—-cmOCM-3--3-CM-3-OOOOOOCMOOOOOOOOCACMoooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CM CA — vDOvD IftOOmMvO-J1 O O NMin^ IA41 P^vOvOvO N— vO CM IS CACO O 3-OCMOO O CA O LA-3" — CM — -3"

O O

ISIS

ooooooooo — ooooooooooooo

-3- ca cm ca -3- la \o o w<r Lnoo <n oo-3--a-vOvoisisisCMCMCMCMCMCA— CMCMCMCMCMIS — -3- LA

O I vO vO vO vDvO vOsD N is is fs is. rsfsooco CO OO OO OO OO OO OO OO CA CA

0)3C

cOO

-3-

in

CM

•o 3<u c=— ••

4J m (/>

<TJ > •w

3 -o cO

4-)3

(0 «> Oo e *—

•— i_4-1 4-) 4J

O trt <l>2 LU r

1

1 <D

<U*->

107

Page 120: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

3C

CA

oc

\D

CA

!_

O

cOE

ro

c

L.

o-3-

I

>

CAI

<

Xi

CO LA -3" M4-<T \D— CO CM 3" -3- LTVPACA

LA-3" CM CM VO — —

*— W)

c1c3r- o o

<0

3

Q— CC-— (/>

J_

C 3coo.- — jz

CC (0

u3T3

(0

>to

4- W

c o* o

— *u •> unj «4- .—» si+-> c a: oo ~^-' cI— CD

1_

CO OlSCTiJ- mmLA O SO 00 PA CO -3"

ca\0

CM -3" LA CM CM -3- -3"

CMLA

r>» CM CO CA r»^ LA CA LA— CA LA PA — P"^ OO CA

o o -a- — ca o cm CM

CA

— NO- O N (*> CM

OOOCMMNN— CM -3" <T CO -3" CMoo-3-

— PA LA O VOo o cm — r^ o — oCM

<L)

2

o o o o o o o

O LA PA PA CM CA O CM— — LA CM CA — vO -3"

OOOOOOO O

VO Q)^^"^^^^^ >CA CA CA CA CA CA CA <C

<u3—fO

>

o0)4->

<D

E+JIrt

OJ

c<D

-C •

+J E— o2

II

+JC -3"

<D LA> •

a) cm

>* Xc(0 •

c• <D —

<u a3 3f^ «— • •

to U t/>

> C -U•— *—

-

X) c•<l> M 3+J O(U C OE•—

(fl L.+j 0) -MVI O 0)LU Q S

TO -Q

4-1

o

108

Page 121: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

- — sz ca r^ o o — o o ca cavO

od:«vQU.

#.

.*—

s

ou_X—

^

Ifl

2 uO c =3

o ou.

4->

J_

3

Q

si

F— q:»— ^-^* </»

03 L.*- c 3C o O•— •— _cfO 4->

ccu

•o

>•CD

o

DC

u- U)

M- •> a>

o ^—N. .cc & o3 ^—^ cq:

— (/)

r— nj •> V<u *4- X—

*

j:+j c q: oo .— •*—•' ch-

4)uo

oo r»-o — LA — O OO CM CO -3- O ^- IAN- CM OO LA CM<TiOOoo-3, -3- 4, iAoo m cmcacm — cAO"\cMr^

N — J- vD W\0 CM CM — — vO CM t-x —

LrtCOCO (MIANCONNOOONONoocnNOMftOMTuninvoLn cmlacmlaoolacmlaca cm CA r*» la cm ca-3-

— si vo ca ca cm ca -a- -3- -a- — -a- cm ca cm r—;r — CM vO

OlAintMOOM-JOOOOOOSN-if OfOOOUMAOOO la r^P^LALALACMCMLAVOVONNCMJ-WNoo la cm— vocaoooca

— cm ca — o \o o — o — i — ca -a- co n -a- co-a- — i — —

vO vO CA-3" — CMCMCACMLAvOvOLA N4- roiTiN N O M

O \0 LA vO CM LA — CAvO CM CA CACOr-v.cMOOooooocMor^.o VD4- NLft^TO- CMOO — CA O O O —ooooooooooooo oooooooo

r^NLnMNOUMAwoin-ino -a- CM O CM CM <T O <novoif\ON MmCM — -3" vO CM — — CA

— oooooooooo — o oooooooo

N o\D r«» cmr^ <o ^ i^ CA-3-LAOOOACALALAvOvON — CM LA CA -it CO— CM — — — N N N (MS — — — — l*"* — CM LAW^ ^^ ^"^"^^ ^^ ^s. O ^^'-x^^^Woococacacacacacacacacaca — j- j-^- j- umaiavd

-u<D3C•—4->

co •

o (/>

X** 4-1

c<U><u

4-1

f—0)

E2OcV)

-acro

2Ocw

"DCO

>—o>c

•—

J_

<u-Qo4-)

oo•

l- Eo ou-

II

cO -3"— LA4-J •

CO CM4->— XQ.

•— •

o c<u —

• l_

"O Q.a • •

j-> 14- V)

<o O 4->

f— •—3 L- CU 0) 3r— "OCO c oo •—- •«

«U L.4-1 E +J

O V CDz QC 21

+->

o

109

Page 122: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

<U

3C4-1

COo

-Dc(13

en

ro

enc

QU.

Bc^— o ou. — _cM

roj_

3

Q— or— '— </>

M- C 3COO._ _ _C(TJ +JC£ ro

l_

3o

0J1_

LTV

CM

>c

o

-3-

I

<

ro

OOvOvDCMvDvD — LAra oocMcOLnoorv\cMi^-3--3- vo

LA ON LfNCM —

CNOOCM-^-OOr^-OLTVLTVCOO-JOOOvOONM CAO

— ct-a- — vO 0""V CM P-. -3" LTV

irwo-3- r-^oo NtvroinCM vO OO — LA vO — MN OOO — NONN ca

in

ro

>^

o

—cy

«+- «n<4- « 0)O—

>

;

J=c cy o3 —' Ca: —

•— roro+->

oc cc

ro

-3-

cAcr>LrvcMLf\-j- — r->«

LTVCMLAOCMLnCMOLA CMCM N MM M(^ — cr\ — <r

cMCMi-x.— r-* — -3- o^ laOOOOOOCMOOOooooooooo

oo <r>OLntr\04- ocaOOcmo — vor^cacaCM

O O O O o o o o

*»*. OO M O -3" LTV —\£) <J\ — CM L/\ CM CM CM C"\

vovovovo r^. r-» r»* r-. co

CM

c3

en (J

ro U

><•t-l

OJ

2:

110

Page 123: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

fO

-o

ooI

en

LAI

<

03

J-

r^. <*~

N

r^ Q<r> U.

s lrt

Tl c l_

c — o 303

u. — O4-* -C

vO 03

r^ uca 3

T3

03 to

c L-

C O 3.- ._ OfO +-> -Ca: ro

i_

3

03

en

3J3(/)

s_

l_<+- in

031M- » <U

O ^-CCO'U3 *-" C0£ .-

— to— ro « <U05 M- ^-s -C*-> C OC OO — *— C— OJ —

U

CD

or-*ooooLnoocvjoo\ocr\— vor^vooovors>.-fl--d-oo oo <r\o nn cm rv o<rooN OvD-3- NvO LAvD fs

rrij- j- r^o- n is. — CM CM -3" \D CA co cri<r-*\D n <r»rs —

OOOOOOOLAOOOOOrAOOOOOOLAOOLALALAOOOLACMOOOOO — LALAOLALAOr^LAOVO O CACO VO — <r>-a-rs.rACV4CMCACA-fl-Ors.lACACS|-d-CO-3--a- — CM — CM CM CA — —

OLACMOOLALAOLALAOCACAOLAOOOr>.LAOCMLAOCMCAOLACMCMLA— fs-LACACAOrsLALALA— l-sLA-TCM

LA CM -3* LA — O — CM — CACMOO fA — MOJ O ON N

-3-CA — vOOLACMCMLACACA-3- —CM — —

Is. CM -3" — CALAO(ACA-a--3-CA-3-VO CM O O CM LA LA O —

CM r 3--a-oo —

(NISO-TOMV-LAOCMCMCM — LA O CA CA-3"

CA CO

C^M vD LA — OCA — OLA-3-O — CA -3" ps LA OO LA vO CMOOOOOO — OOCM-TCAOOO OOSO-40OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO — o

CA CA CM LACM LA vO CACA — |s» CO CA CA LA Is. — LA CA CA LACA O -3" -3" CA vO CA — OO OO vO — O — vO vO CM LA CM — -3" LA O— OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO — OO — o

is.

-3" CMI I

r- LA — vO CO O LA CACA-3- CM CMCMCM

CACM

I

lAvO NO^O — OO— N CM N OrxNIvoOCA-3--3- LALALALALALALAvovovovOvOvOvovo rs rs rs. is, rs.

T30)

3c

EO

II

-3-

LA•

CM

. OJ X-0 30)

4-J 03 C03 > •—

3 -OO OJ ••

>— *-> to

03 03 4-1

O E •—•— cM +-> 3

O if)

1

LU Oi-

+J

1 03 3:

<3J

4->

111

Page 124: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

<u3CMCOu

fO

D1C

ooI

ens_

-O

i

<

-QfD

occ

ou.

A^—s.ou.>»*

3 «/)

O C V-*-» O 3u. — O

4-» JZ<0u3-o

,—

.

o#— OCTP«M ^—*CO in<4- c s-

C O 3•— — Oro 4-1 -Ca: <U

i.

3o

V)>•ro

TJ

>-1_Q

a:*vo"

M- inu- • a)O --s .cc o» o3 — cOC

r— (A— ro « Q)

ro *4- -—» .c•-» c a: oO — —' c1- ro •—

u

a>*jfOQ

cor»»cnvor»>.oocnoISNN-vOOOinONM ocoomoooom nnoomONco mo en enco oo LTvO

— cv^cor^^r-3- m co m-a- urv-a-m-a- — m — co — oo — -d-

ooooooooooooooooounooooooOOUMf\OUMf\Oir\OUMniAir\UMAl^NOOOUMAO-a- <r» la — — CM CM CO — M-a'-JN-

irv in rv r^. o o cm o ir\ mo ONOOOOinNUMninuMnNN\OvDlAO<r\ONNOin-LnOOON\DNNNNNCM CM — O — MO N-Mf\- N OvflO — - (*MArsMoO O

CM

CM-J-OvONOvOOON--* vO LT\- f^vO - MO

IV lAt^ [>. 4" ? OO J"— co—3-cM-a-uTkO— -3" -a- co ONN mf/\a>eo -o4-vON-m-3-OONN03N-a-

CM-inmrNUM«siA-ir(<r»f<MsvDr>.oocr»ooNiA-NincMO — O CM OO — O M(M Lf\- CO — OOO — CMOO

"^C oooooooooooooooooooooooo

so f^fJMSf^cnxo m m vo 00-3- mo o-3--a-O-a-CMLnv0C0CMCM-3-LTVCMC0-3-00OvDCM — -3" "— CO CM CM Ooooooooooooooo oooooooo

vOrv

vO

O — UO LO — CO OO tn MJ-lAOlfttsOvONOO-N— ---NNNNvOCOCTl------NNNMrOSS*W*v»W»xWWWWWWWWO orNisrsisNNSNcooocooococo rri en en en <r» <r> en en

aCD

3C

CD

enci_

o

cOE

ro

CDenroenc•—roi_

EOi_

M-

MOC„

CDcnro •

cn Ec O•—ro II

i_-3-

>LTV4-> •— CMU

XEO •

J- c• n_ —

• <u13 3 -o<D t— 0) ••

+J fO C 10

<U > — 4-»

t— ro —3 "D +-» cO CD XI 3r— 4->

fO ro uo E CD —

•— 3 V.

M *-> •— +Jo 10 ro CD

ro -Q

CD4->

o

112

Page 125: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

<D

3c

CO

c

coe

03

C

coi_

oo

Cnl_

in

co

LA

<

-Qf0

c »-

O 3— o+j .ccoi_

D

O— a:

coor:

o^cnooovo — MNN CM (nvOOO — P*~ CMO CA P»> I 4 ClvO MS

I O O vO — CON CMAISOO-j- oo ca -3- vo

— CM — CM — N N CM 3" CM CM LA LA CO CACM

CM LA -3"

CM

oooooooooooolaolaoCD CO <0

CM LT\ON OM*M*M^IAON-3- r-- o — cm oo oo co r-^ la — o o

LTV O o -a- r->o oo —-3--3-0 — -3- ca o — — ocsioo-jvorocMco mooco —=r vo vo

CM CM <T CA — CMCM — OA — —

1/1

>HCO

-o

o

o"

4- </)

<+- « <U

ceo3 —' Ccc

r— CO «

CO <4- ^—

s

4J c cco — --

'

I— CO

u

LAOOLAOOOLACMLALAr^LAOLACM

OCMO-3--3"LALAOOLA-3-LACAOOCMf^.LAO

oa-3- o oCM CO O O IAUMA

fVCM CM

rriO-J IACO CANCn 0\v04-ON00NOv0OOvD\D4 — O

O T — CM M- LA IA4--VOO- — CM — VD CM — PA LA CA CA— CM

ca ca r^ ca — mm-*-* CA vO O LAMOOvD

O OO OMO r-» CM

NcM o-rsCM CM CM CO O J" NLACO vDOO

CA CA CM CA — LA CM LAOOO LA CA !-«. 3" LA

CO CO CDLA -3" CO I

aD N LA CM CA CM CM CA vO LACOCAOOOCMOO — OOOO — OOOOO-d-OOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

r-. caoo \o 00 inowoOOO [-» CA CA-T LAOO

CMOOCMOCMCALALACAOLA — OO CA CMJ-CM4-CMNOOCMOMCM T CA OO CA CA

OOOCA— OOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

VO CM

^ o -a- la o r».

CM MNCO CM N CM M S CA CA -3" LA Is-. OO MO -d" l*-» O•v^^v^n^^v^v^v^ N\ONCMCMNCMNN4" — MO CA CMOOOOOOOO SNSSNSSSN — V. \ — *v v^ v^

<r-3--3--3--a--3--3--3--3-LALA\OM0M0vOvO

3C

cnc

uO

coE

0)

cnCO

cnc

EO

cnCO

cn Ec o

CO II

1_-3"

>-LA4-J— CMO

XEO •

L. C

"?, =>~°

<D _<i>

o c> — +J

•- CO —3

, -a +j c

Ik+J °

f0 CO (JO e 0) —— 3 1-

O {/y ro <U

031/1

CD

O

CD -Q

113

Page 126: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

o co— CMvOOCA

130)3C+JCoo

CO

(0

enc

O

coE

CO

OLl.

r- o

co

3-o

Q— C£

Cfl V)M- C L.

c: O 3— — oco <- j;DC CO

L.

3•o

>Hco

T3

Q

O LTVLA |^

LA r^.

LACM

CA CAvOv£>

LTV Oen

CA

co

eni_

3XI(/)

1_

J_

CO

LAI

<

JQCO

a: r>» cm CA\ —a--a-

o» • •

O -—* .cc O u

•— CO •>

*> c oco —w

co

— LA

d d

-a- vo\D CA

d d

coCM

0)

enc

oMCoE

CO

<Den •

co <den dc —— roCO >L.

"OE <DO +-»

L- fO<+- EM 4-1

O ui

c a>

- c<U <T3

enro -c •

en +j ec — o— 2CO II

J- 4->

C -3"

>« <D LA+J > .— 0) CM

c

COLA

Or*. 0)

r»* en<u \ co4-1 LA LA L.

CO CM CM 0)O W >v£> vo <

• 4- Cj>

<U T33 T3 3.— 0) —CO C U> — C 4->

CO —

-

T> 4J4) X) 4J•MOOCO

E <U•— 3

in

c3

c o

4J — 4) 4-1

l/l ID O ULD>0 Z

CO -O o

0)+J

o

114

Page 127: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

(0<DOcCOuCO

Li-

lt-•—o

oo

II

CMm

%o

-Q cr— a)

• uIS " cors yfi vi-

ca T5 ct-

T-— •— •—r— Q

"O o>- c (/)

r- ro

> vD ro LA— is 4-> •

1- CA o lOMM m— +Jco IIz » T3LU -3" 0J CNCO oa 4-J ^

is 3CO *->. i CL

CM — EX ^. Oo o %z uj •_ oUJ _l > cOL oq •— <L)

Q- < M V-

< — •— 0)

cc 10 M-< c U-> <u •—

d OLu-

Lu CMo ^:cCO LA< •

31

II

CQ cs

0)r^-Q03

r-

Monitored

total

ate

solids,

lb

Q

LA CM LA « 3-CO CA LA vOvD NIAN N CT\ PACM

I -— T— I | |

CT\ CO LA - i- vO N - CM fA CO CM \D fA OCM CA-S* vO fA LA fA\D fA fA f- fA— I I II

CM fAis LACM --

CM Is^-lAOfsvOr^-tLf\i- OnisCO NvO Lf\i— CM CM «—

OOOOISNN0O0O OMlrtCOLrt-r i- t-CM — CT\O O

rs rs

LA -- fA CM vO CM O ISCNlkoNIAMCM CM Lft fA CM CMI i— «- I I I If—

I I

ca vo caco rsoco fA en rs\o vo oa «—CM CAfALACA-a- fAVO fA fA -- CM--II I II

O -T^0 fACM --

NvOvOvOOO -• lAi- OvOCT»CMfAvi5COfA\OLA-- .- CM »-

LA

OvO\00«—tT\CMvO-a*-T\OOt— IS --

-tTOOvD CACACM LA fs \0 -if _T -3"fA CX>— CMrs is

>-00 N LftlSvD <- cnisOOCM--CMCM-3---CA--

I *— -- I II I

I

oCA

orsrsLArscr*LAfAO>>LA--\o laoofA fA fA<f CM -JT -3-VO-TCACM

t— I I II|-r ca

OO fAfsOArsLAvOOALAvO S-31 MvO rsj- LAJ-r- -- CM «—

CA

oLALAvO-T CAfACA-T-3-OO IA i— CA -3"

fAOO LAfAfACM\Or->.LA-3- LALAO CAfA -Trs rs

IS LA CA -3" <T CA LA OO OO |OACO -=T LA t— OA CM fACACMf-"

fA i-

LACMfACACMCM-TISLAfAsOLAOOCM(*\r- fsi- —\OCO CM . 3" CT» CMvO

fA CMrs \oCA OO

<fl

vovovo vovovo vo ro r^» r^. r*- r— r-*. r^ rs is rs rs rs rs roNNrsvDNNSvD IS +J ISNNNNISISMSMMSMSWSWSWSNS O IS S. S. S. S. S» S, IS S. S. S. S. S. S. O —COCO OSMLf\OON<T\ 4J SO-- NCOOO OSNMCO CM^J" *J CO— CMfALA— CMCM0A---O. OOi—i— »-CMCMfAfA--«— CMCMCMCMJ- -M^^-^^^^^ — -• S.s,s,s.s.s.S.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.3 o

vD vfl vO vO vO vO \D fNISCOCO CA ffMT> t/) I—\0 NNCOCOCOCO CA CA CO

CO•M

115

Page 128: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

1^

oa

-ac(U

vO

la-3-

>M>

c0)

V)

CM

CMI

-QCO

c\

vOLACAPAOCMCMt— -3"

Mf^vD LftO OvO i- CMO^1 ON i-ss,. i

* #> •» •* ma<r — -3" r- «- ,-

I I I

OCOONONfMNfALAP*.-3-.— CMCMLAOOPA00«4NOmtMmi-

cooo

*cm oco\o m p>.co -a*Opa*— CA-3--3-CM»— -3-

CMCM CA PA «— vO -3" LA CMI

LA PA CM .— CM

CO vOo CA^ T»* •l

CM CM*""

1

CM vO «— PA-3" CM

3"ooPACM

VO--OCON-VOON-3- oo co co p«*oo r»» p*» «—CA PA LA CO CAOO CM CO -3"

«- CM CM S »— LA

vo oy- CMCM CM

3*3- MD

4J LA

MlvO

a

aEOt_5

CN

CA CM -3" — vO CM OO -3" LA PAN fANvOvfl <M a\r- J-Nr-vDN^- CAvO *- CM

-3" «-I

PA!

la la r^. — caco ca la pa4" •- U\ O 4- ^- lAin N

I vflf-41 i-vD lf\LT\N

PA PAI I

I

CM i- CMI I

OO LACA LASo -3-

ca ooi i

r^»LALAcrv-3- p»»co -3- -3*

u\rs<r>o LAOOOOO ovoocacmcai— «— pa*—«— CM LA PA -3- CM i-

PAP>.No

CM

P*«-3" Nf-4 ^OOO PA VOoo vo cm ca p-» p»* o pa -3-

r^r^oooo caco -3* co -3-

en *- cm p>» »— la

vo cao p^.oo -3-

y— PAMr vo

+J

o -a

-o •

L- -Oo —*-> I—- oC ifl

o

lao ca ca-3- *— co -3- op>. co -3- r*» v£> -3- p^.covo-3"P»»cacmcmcm-3-i—

•* | A A #i » ft

-3- CM i- *- t- —I I

*- pao«— vo co oo -3- ca•— CM CM CA LA CO vO — -3"-3* p^pa»— oo p*. ca pa o

CACM

PA

«— 00-3-00C0OOV0-3-0A PANOO MACACO •- nNvD P-«.»- NOO fOr- | 3" \D i— CO LA

I

CM i- CMI I

LA CM

.- r- LA CM PA CM «—

OCMNO

CA

«— r*.-3- CO LA -3" CA CM SCM PA-3--3* CM-3" LA LA -3"

vOCALACOCAP^CMP^PAr-.. o CM P^ i- LA

p>.

CA

PA

OALA*

LA

vOPA*-OOCAOCOCAco -3- p*» s cm cm ca ca oOO OAPA-3" «— O -3- -3" r—

LA CM CM -3" CM PA

OA

CMOAOOPA-3-OAOO pa|0O -3"-3- -3- P*»CACMCM-3-C0P'».O CMN>-v0 4- r- LftoO n»- >- O

VOOO y— PA -3" PA PA CMPA

LALA

vOvO vO vOvOvO vO(UP>. N P^vO r^.P^px.vO r^ -m

oooo ON-a- i^nncti w•— CM PA LA »— CM CM CA »— -QS 'N. *«s» «^ ^. \ v.. v, ^s. 3vO MSCOCOCOCO CA CA O

p>. r*. r>- r>. rop^pv.p*%p>.p^p^p^p>.p*» *jNNNSNSSSS O —^"vV. — \f SNOW fD-3* LA LA vO CO •— — CM PA .O +J

LAsOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOcO H-

(U

-a<ol. ena j*

II

"O -3"

<U LA

o •M Oc xoE -Q

II

«u ..

U V)

c *->

a) .-u ca> 3

oi_

E

Oz

116

Page 129: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

en

ooi

>.cin

V)

c

V)

(M

CA

CQ

%Uc<ul_

<DM-<+-

a

co

II

C\s<£

«&

-G uf- c

a>n i_

to a)

TJ M-•— *4-

^— •—o Qin

,

as4-1 LTV

o •

+J vD

TJ II

<uM C\3 ^Q.EOo%oc<u1-

<u4-M-

Q

LA

II

C\*£

CD

Mo -a4J —T3 «<D inJ- "OO —+j

— OC (/)

os:

0)M(D

rf

Q

vo-3-oocr\ooo<r\Lr\r-\o crwocAr-*— cmcacmco<siocr>cr»rACA(rvi— r^oocsjT-vD — crvt—

o

so r-*. cm i n Nrsors«t-^-irio\o o i oi i i •> * * *. i i * i •— t— <— CM .— t- ,-

I II I

la>— -3-cala«— lacala«— vo-3-cacm crwoor*-*J--*^DM>-COOO-3-|NC^<-OCOvO NOO <- IACM LA CA CM CA «— CACO IXC^vO lA^DvO CT> N \D LA

CAOLA

CM CM CM <— i— CM r~ CM r-

CMLACMOCACOCALA-3-CMOCACAvOI--|-"»CMCMcoco r-~oo «— r^\o ca ca r»» la r- r>.o cr\ *— <r voMN- I CA I VDCTWO — 0-d"<TOLAO I O

I I •> •> «. I I •» I •. «

I II I

— OCO-T N -- CA CT» CM LA P^ •— CA «— LAi— (JINcaco cm — ca cm o <r la ca r^. ca-4- ovovo ca «—CO-3- CA CM CM O CA CACO LA-3" -3" vO vO CA CA V0 vO

CM CM <— CM «— CM

CAI

CACM

CMLAoCA

I

LACM

CACM

o — vo <r c^cooovo caco la p>»co cm ca— ca cmLAvocMLA-3--d-r-^vor-*r>-.o<r\cMcAr-»vOvocMco— i ca^ -ctcalacacaca-^calaca i r-

i •> •> i i i i

i i

CA -3" CM CO CO m-Tco rvCAN U\CO N<- PnvO Noococo la ca cm rsoco ca r«- ca cm .3- — vo r^LA-3- cm — cm r^ r>» ca en i^- ca <r la la en <r vo vo

•t * * ^ n * r> «s »r- ,— CM -— «— CM «— CM '

CALAvO-^-LACAvO-TvOr-^l—COOLACOCO I^.LAlavo lacao-3--3--3-covo cm r-^ r-^ cn\o r^ en laLACM — — v£> CA CM CA -tf

-|->» -3" «— LA CA CA LA LA

— «— CM i— CM CA

r^>*.

i «-s \ \ \ ^ ^ \w pv. r^.^ \ s ^ \ \— CMCO CA<T CA CM CA-3- LA^^^CACA-y-^vD CACMCMCM — •— — CMCMCMCM LA vO «— *— i— «— t— r-

^-<j-^j-vdvOvdvOvovOvd CAcr»<r>cT4<r>cr\cr>cr>

<rcn^~M

CM1 T3

a)MO

T3a)

r^ L- O)a. j£

9\ i ll

CMCM -a -3-

<l) LAL. J"o •+J oC Xoe -o

^—II

CAr^ <u ••

CM O U)* ' C 4Jo <u —CM u c

<U 34-4- Oa s-

4->

. a)

ro E

c— . ,

«TJ <D+J •MO oh- z

117

Page 130: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

isisen

CCO

vOisCA

o-3-

I

l_

3-Qtn

i_i_

fDX

%\

c\

is fA la .3-

oo cncofA cm la

i i

-a- isIcmlaooKo

en fA la cm »— la cm£> i — cm o I

I

CAis

V)

c0)

(A

CM

-fl-

ea

<D

<DM3ojEO

CM

vo o oo oo irskois cm la la-3-|laLAmrs rA-3-ko

oo isoo rs-3- ncdoLA CM LA CO 00 envo oo

CM »- r- 00

-3- O fA rr\ O00 O 00 00 CM•— -3- i i car i

ofA-3"

O CM LA-3" CM LTV0OOp--N4-vo^fA I

SOenfA

oocaLA

fA

-3-

fAI

fA is rs is cmrs CM CM 00 t-<^vo<r cm en

soCMOfA

rsOO CO — fA IS CA fA

CM i— >— <o

enoovo

-3- -— — cnoolcnLA O VO I laila

oa vo fAlLn' r i

-3" -3" or* vO OO «— CMN M ncTirscg CAfA ,-_

CM

rs cm

LAOO Lf\M^MM Oi- IS«— LA O CM CM

CM

laLA

fA

fA vo -3- en is »- la•- — IS CM IS rs oo

LAooCM

o-3"-3-

fA

MO -Q

0) </)

O •-+J .—- oo

CA IS -3- <r CM00 CM -3" O fA«— cm m cm vo

voCALA

CM

fS O CA LA LA CM ISfA CA LA IS O CAvOf^ Mr- ,-

CA LALA LAO \o

— fA

^ —^° ~ vO IS (0IS VO VO IS S. 4JSNNSO

O

VO S. S. O CM 4Jr-NNr.\JJ7>ws o 3LA IS fs LA »— tO

r*> rs is is is (ors rs rs is rs is is +j

^r* ^^^s^^ O-3-*vVj-3-rsLALA4JCMvOCA— — CM CM .Q^^.^W.^SS.3-3-vOvOvOvOvOvO </)

Mo

a<u4Jo

• •*»

•aCOua OI

.*ii

IIo<U -3"

i_ LAO -3-

M ••— oCo XE

JQII —CD

o ..

c V)

<u wu MM

a) Ci

3

O Oi_

•M• a>

to E

# #

<u

o

118

Page 131: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

c r o c o c <' coccocoocr <- n r »j if >o h- cec^M<'^wo o o c; o c c c r c — — — ~ — —c c o c c r o cc r-<-coc"or>c c c r* c c c r r c c c c c o rC r- C f O O r o o c ccc-'" c* r>c c c- o c c c ececcc-occo c c c c c r ccceccC'Oc

e o- c- o o n cj o,

~ •- « — <\» fS.' r- |\jcr<^ccoo<-coccorcooc-ccoacocc ocrcoc-cc c o c c rcc

ot <•

4- o t o o e © o c- tr c. c r«rtr\<r-«cffc~ t*t r. •* v- *.

oorooc c ccoooc-eecoeceocococccocc-r-occfeooccecocc c c c c c c

p* a" ff C — M^ 4 If i > <occccorooccc'ccooccr. cccoccoec. r rcoccc

- — * » r

ozo —I-x co

a _i

a. lua. Q< o

c c* L

u_ a —

7 a K-x a «c *\i

u ^ ku. u7 UJ— c— c

O X'

ID a -f- - * —— tr u. X.

T — z *

*- C ¥- Z 2*

Cl~

u.- » 3c v X c:c u »- l;

c - z— *— < l. aZ c£> CJ .J u.— L_ c

-» UJ3 U. *^ H-

c — U* U. Z-3 lu a a •-

A. K D

LL

> e o t_ c e: — c • C *rt

*a cc »couc— LU </*• <e-- l: *N. U.

•- w — Ow^K«-C a —* CLVOecrez — l f a— x > — o — •.**«- 1 v > a.•" cc ^ *- * a, — er c 1 — c u.

c -j»c-»u/c*r Z c H- u.<— C — t C > r — c C u- D o— »O.OI-Of.-C » — K u UJ c»-— * o - — »wC — K C a U X< c — — — — — o — c <«JCaco-oroc — c -> X V,X — CVCLJCEC.— c « uc t " — * — c-. & — — c x > tr. Xo.l*<->— — *- «-eco c u LL' *T h-* i <\ - z r u. ~ • c e \r> c— u" *: — h* c u c— r •- Z ^> tr oc * » c * — u. r- o - — < z u.(_.^- — (_— w^._(_,«-fX. a. « >. a.— co — ozc*-— oei H- ^> IT * Xw o c — i*- u a z — r xc-- — —

. l^ — • at — — C U. — * < LT X> «. _ %r. •* — t-tj — c C -1 — a< — — • r o cac * c >* X z fNJ

c r :: — c c •(„• — - c C U. t" ^c * •ot*— *— — trc a r ir> — If

• — — c •"- — CO »c UJ c < z c *N— cc— — — cc c*- — y z lu c < a nCrco— ct:c;— — o — - — o f tL o Z X r*c— — U.C - — w — cc o z # u_ — ft •- u a I

— — — c— — *-vo — c < — a. > «A u u- *n— c — X — oz>e- — x- o. r Z K- z c <r£' <: > t^> O L>— h-^-X1 » Lu C Ui Lj o <>

— U. •JC-<tt*L- C U. H * C U V* a. \

*r> — q.^-wO' »*eo <a •J 4/1 >" a nT

o — O • U.tt — — •<"* » Uj LL a X — U. c- . o — - u • r. O — «— K O ^ C O e. y. _j ^ ^— — — r o • — rec- •a t o • cce— co*- c— — C i- r\j 0l LL Ot 13 u. C <^

(VCZ— — CO — ^ — — * C C tr Lb< OV CL

«u.

kL'MlLBfCHw^k^ Uj >* • Q J c Z^C_-U- C — > > O. Z C C- LL. « > X L-

i-ac a.zcc»c- v. X • a 7" <•> X z u IC c c

j_ „ — *.— c — c c * *J C z c— c — — o c c c c > _j u- 2 LL -v o c c

™ o ' cccc— c — rr 2 v. L U. > cc c — or— — — — U O. > > II H H.- — w — — — c — -a >C w LL u. - Ll. K X • IT r\ N. Hv w 7 «. - ir c li T. »- a. C • O c C x CM ^ 7 U. i

Z fS X'OCfWL_t_ u. < r* K ff r« c s. ^ < «.) Xu. (C >- a. I c c ar a y o r u • <\» V v. a. V

Cl U. Q f v v » k X SX f LJ v. V a C a Q

C X LL. X* V >». "^ • »- t~ K I-

— rs. rn *• lt> *c i

— ^ — »C < C xC C C c cC r-j » — .

» — W — cITK »-— *- LL <• HC X H- T« ft — a »:u- O C C Li

a u> y u. ao —

L. U C C C ' <- U(_'UU

rs. #»*

r OC CC C

r» tr c co c o —c o c rc o o r-

119

Page 132: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

— ro •-er —«-« r\J

IT K

c r

c a X _, CL 1

z C_ D ^ m fc K

V LL 3; X X C/) Lfl

< C CO U, U. XJ C C

U- r c ^ c ^ ^**M C

XCM „

V* ir

*m «M CM IV cv := cr.

0_z>

a. ^ aLA c

V. X*-

1

c c Cc ^

LLL_ / \ c"

XUi if 1

z^u. U- u. u. a > X > i^ X > U cc

1

O a.«

(- * C CMC-

C

2a

XX

It II Z v. X Cc -1 M a > W.

c < LL <I c X r.(M U- > a. _j >c 1

2: »- <r LL X X 1

c a.* CM v u a O

at -J W"? IS J- X a.

a XT. CM e U C Xl- cr C e O. X) EC X u- X Pv

cr c c C X £ L-2: V u_ LL LL 4- LL

a c a r- - K cr X C 2 >0. L_' -) c > O L_' U CL < X -J- 1K <r L.' u; >- K LL LL U- X

1

h- c > u 1 -J X (MC UJ a. U LL X IT C*5

c Bl u. u. c V V A ir U" < > V LL er

X cr > e L^ e fc- eX 4 <. Cl z O O LL < UJ c < L_ _? X- L_ -5 c *: CV a CL L. 0. ef Q. LO C 2? c_ CM

l_" i: a r^ !* r- >- > a LL X X Li X2 L- a (_ > K C h- <r H c U-i

IL <: u. c X i/i X LL (•- i/»

*- *- C LL L. C LL £ <I 7 <: X u- * 1V U UJ f. >V. LL < Li. C! e C c ^> <r a'UJ cr U 1 a c C c c cr. LT. t/» VI V- ^ < *c •0

S <_• h- C u. a C<r X c «" •v f rv > X X X

< c c -J f- ^ < (Mi f E X z X V V X <r lT CM CM

c a c V CM «\i c c u. C. X V.

c UJ UJ O O O IT <M J" * u. t- t- («>r C > ?r V u. U. ll (M V) O CM X < Q

c *~ fv

J* ' < I "~ ** "V r» '" C ^ c

crcc

cr «: X u. 1 1

-r c CL a >C O <: r- >f it ^ a 2 C -

5 cIT- - X * X X > > * 1- h- UJ -c cr

u <: cv fM tv fM Cs. l- O <r <r LL C IL; c u c X > ke y •» •4" «f »~ C 2" ^ t- - 1- *- K 1" LL X < > X V X<r at * a UJ C a or c c et ar rr rs CM r-j CM

UJ c a c V *-. V. *M. u. LL U_ or c (/) •- c c C c. c a CJ C c_

a

c

* u_ftl m c in *C

2IfCM

- ^ u. LL <I LL

CV

i

OO

c 3Oc 1

cc u.

if

- - r^ f*i * IT -C N cs C

— zc —

z — —m C <\-

— o c

ip. mc — —— c e

- -1 '_' „ u- _

oc c- r* •*— — rj cmo c c c000c

cm -r -f cr. c o—ics- irtfif. i/jhcffrcm r cm rv' cm r-

. ir. fn r n c« r 1*1 c r .foccoc 00c occr-oocc00000 ceo ooccrocoozzzzz zzz zzzzzzzz1/1 </ v. L/i i/i i/<i/>ir i/)i/*iAc/:t/ii/itf>cn

^NC"*r *» «*

o c oo o c

120

Page 133: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

eoc-cooocc;r-eecccoococc-oec&o©cccjocccec-oocooc'Ooc>©cocc-ccc.'CCCCCCCC - -, --"" - "'' --ft"^M^'>'^^^NNM^''C'ir,!n''>(r.<'"^'-* <* ^•*T<, *f^, »»-*, *3'l/' IT. tf» If tf IT IT

© © c © © c c:c c. o c c c © c o © c o c o © © e o o © o o © © c e © c c c ©©ceooooocoo.coc.ee© © © © © c © o © © © t. ©» e © © c C ccccncr©©oo©. r>oo©©C'©ce©c©ooce©ocec o © ©C' c © c c c o © c c © c © o © c o c c c © e © c o © © © o o c* c c © © o c © c o r © e o © c o o c o c c c o© <- r reeocooceccocccc'ccocccccoocccccceccocooeoocooeeeoec

» • « # a41 W * * *V « » ft ** ft ft * ft

© — .? c <\i er

' C *- U-s a. C I. u- r 3;

) - c. © V. &.CJ >

: — < <: e£ c- u. C -

o. — I-r *nJ > > Z)2<UJ; « c *

* # ft ft

« # ft ** ft * *ft ft ft ft

w ft it *>

or a c a c cc

D => 2 =• 3 3C C C C COa C o a o. a.

ft ft ft *

tl I' H M 11 11

—. C£ —

.- v —

[I C © C— C ~- «v

U- u I

< L. 2 ~jr - ^3 Z 10 *0i-- 5 3 aJC'i-l/t •

' < < > ft

o -j c_ <r —C •-

— • 3 CL

* cU. *J 1—

U. IT U.II f" k— *X O U' w >>>>>>•_ ^ >— ft 3Z a. \L c c c. c ©

— • • • c c ca. rs;

'

\s- r- © O C • • •

u. — * — 1 — c- cC v. -

a 1/) -* Z < U. U LL LL U li_

u > O c <S O -i -» —— a.— u c K

u. *-r* f 1

a fir :CC 1

— cv c.1- > Ct

3 < 3sr c e.•• ©

II 11 c

IAU1CC1i.*> 3 O 5*

< w 3 '

<• U. Dit > if. 1

— r jic < <

U- C U HZ u> IX. ©CNtt K

© M ftCM — ft

C •o © •C V *

— U UJ III

— c a f-© > > >© - h- K

##•«•• — •- — *

* w « — • c. a —**_*- — w— — 2: — ~ r: — c r ©c©©ce— *- •- •- — — •-_* — c — c. ccc ©c*-•-< — w *T *. u. ^. ©xxxxxx

-< — r-zo: zzoz> — z**>z *- — a *-u.»-u^H-^.ir© cc.c©o— < • <i< «U.C*T< 'ZZZZZZc (- c a 1- u_ oclu. <«*i*i«r<rC — ft C U & 3 o • • • • • •

. — • —JT 1 6. u. C 9" • — <NJ r. * (V fta— y— i-o*—. — ti •— h— >*-coco©a©— c— en*-— u.u-u.u.i^u-

11 r c - 11 r - r x^- • • • • • •.— »-r'— -« — — C**< < It* iLlLOik' U!*-u-C*-'— u-»^ — y r a a a c.a a.

:— k. z*^u.u- — D>>>>>>'ZC.C M £CU*N* Ct> *- *- 1— — I—.— tr *- u. •- a 1* ft&#a.*-te-*-*-»-*-^** ll<i— u. • S • *- •— ^-—— — «•a. u. C. cao-C-R ©ft l, u u. u. u. u. u.

tx-Ca.cc — a-** #•-»«•-•-«•—•-

*r C C <• z 11 ^ aiC_ " -1 — Z H' H* "- I'

' < U i.

r> u. — © - 1

C C. <: c — 1

u a a x *-

*»««•-(* « • u 1

ft ft ft * u.

a f

VI ©o- ©^ «

— «»- Z

V> C P-- < —^ — sc

II II

cu. — —c — •-

> c; h-

u ~ ~ **- —CCO £• c- —

a © v c t

y z z u.' •- 1

c — •- s: —w - — • •- 1

^ ^ *- — 1

U W O (J u (_) O O i-> i- O W (.' u u w u u. u i_-

r- a

o o© ©

^ ir- ir trcoco©coor- cc c © — n * tr <£ <tir ir ir < o ,- ^ i c i©cc©c©c ©©c© t © r» © c> O C © C

zzrzrzzzrzi/i i/* «r w 1/: w w i/i 1/1 ia

c *v ^f *c <r o cv>

h r ^ r- k a. ec© © o © © o cor o © © © oX z z z z z z»/l V> V !•" V» t/» V

* <c o © —«c ac c-o o © © ©o c o c c

121

Page 134: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

oecoooecoct,c_c.ooc_occ.ococt- coco ooc c-ooeccoeeccoeeeccowoccou-iru--*cciC<-M:»cwj^-^s£^r'^f-rw ^-f« r-r-^er©:era.or-ectcerec. c-o c c o ecc-c^ce rococo o coo —_ ~ — __. _^___ — _ — _ ,_ — _— __ — — „ _._„.______-—. — „— — — — — ^\. p^ M (\i <v Cv <-^ f\i <v i"\, rvcocccoococcccccooccccoecococoecccocccceecoccooocccocccc r-*->rcocca<~cecceooeocco'rcoCocccerccccrccccccc.cococccc©eccoccof c cr c o c- o c- e o o c c e c c e © o o o c c c c c c c c c er.crccccooeoocroc©ooc c- cccecccc-ooc ococc cc.c©oocrco rc'ooc©coc©c<"cc©occece©©o

c Zuj Cv. c

c h» »f in,

c ** * o — —i^ <- C C f* C C P* — ccoc

C > X u~ _ C — C"— — X + —i r* — v^~ cr — — <t— . -. *«r i- — C -a. z: — (M — ku- «r *- • 2- ;eCr t- w" >- li <- > c e. I'-

ll _l «r . »l 3— C C- — ~ —— — > a a*~ * — c r— * — x X2 « > — _jL « C. IL Ca * y — q.

it <: ~

LL f\ Pv P>

C X ^ 3H

— <N r-

c r* c*

_j LL L LL

l_ P.. C-\r. > > >

z —c ~

-ecu.rs • co — xL-* «* */!

LL » Q.— Li.

zlzL> *r. a, —— 5: a

Z < a -I— k- ou.d ii a.

C -> ~ HQ. C —

e *- <•

u u. —* C —

— # I <

r- c — o -• o i > C <v. C OOCCO

* c

cC C uj

a zx 3 u.

k c c

x c aLL u >Z _» »-

a a i

. o — »- r* «n •"

• p* c (M c r\i l-

; if

.

- \ C C C> c o o o c c

. «._ — — — -» — -*,. cc_ — *-_ v — <— ww— O ^ ^,L-y.L. Wl_-L.!_ll (NIJC2Cu-CCCCCCcc *r a. e.:icn = xrxrr:mii/><ri^i/i i/* i/i v (/* c * #3-i^333jt3iSS »-OCa:se.aet,aa&,Q. c oc ceo

* ••**«*** ooco*ccc**ec*r»c o e:or-co*ea©<\i~~- — c r*

r^_>TL->cifOcc 'M'tro— Cf^oc — ooe »w —rvcoeeccocc u- • •• • c z; e cc •occcceoc •——w— wwww — w — — CL-U |l

II II |l II II II I' II II M P- £.

t U Cx i rJ 3: unet

CCOceoCCOo o oc *r or. ire.£ C <*

(MOOCCO

o »» Si .^<-o>^CCC»-to > H- H- CC K- U

.czuzc a vwi^i/ircw, a^u-utJuCL.tot^>^c

o i- >h i-e

t_J L. W l_- O w w U w L.' W O ^ W> w w LJ I

CO-ffcooooc

r- er —ceoo c —c o c o o

IT C C — — — — — — — — — — P^P^P^PsjPs.PgP.«VPNl^lP'

cccr eococccccoooocecooocnrrzr'zzzzr'2r'zzr22rrzzz2p rzi' l* ^ /. /. it L*. ifi i^ / 1/^ v. i/ t^»i/,!*/^»/»i/li/^i/lir'V^i/-. l/»

122

Page 135: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

* if . O" - « i** auutfxsr c\ - *. u u ix

"ifinririfif-if. »-•--*•!tr coectccecircoirtr trtrirtr iri<e r- r~ r- »* r* r-ec^-ccecocccccca.'**• • • • • • «n •r»p»r»r*'*Nrk

:

t (« fft m « f. fr • r*i • • • • • • (

!**• f (n m mm i»i r i" i

« « «**««•»;ODCcercce c <

* • • • • • • *» •«» ^* ^^ ^ -» i

• c»- f* i*. r» f- r- • **. • • • • • • . «

r- r» r* *» r>- k •* r- f»- i

' M O C II* O C C I c o — e o c_. I * I- U. U U U L U U I U> u. u. u.

Cu.CCCCCCu.Cu.i-wu-a.uu~z c oe o cr a a a c c. c o c c c c c -j-<r~— — — — — u.— a a. a c a ttafCCC-CO

ccico&uccCucxxrr.xrxr-xxi/1 v. w to ir> c* vt %r sr. i/> tr

a a. e caaccLC-Q-c.

reortoeonxsc«r c cc*ecoeo-_c-ooo*rr>r*jorc— «t *tf

C <" — rv cj — (..• c O O CJ

C^-OCCCOC*' CJ c

u. u y u. uC t- c c < CI I X Xi^ V. I/? \r. t/» trt X X X 3a a a CI o C* u # «o c e n o cc c c c o oo c r c- o <~

r o r r oc er

.£ N c rr c, CT.

P (--> r* c c C

U_ — L.U.U.U.U-U.U-c u. c c a c c y cxcxxxxxxxa 7- a a. a. a- o a _a

eooer-c^rc-ct — c-»c^c c c «v»* <v v o c «* c o cC C f*\ c- c -» o © co © — e o c ooo

b\»< C C C O C C ()

I- »cot-oco • G >» fi h ll ii o -acoceccooccceococ— * —t_cc. ©c*o©ccc©©c oecrh- — — — — *-**—•

Z«firirirtfifir^(rjc-: c * ^ <j c - • —••—«-

•—• tf.

c^'J-c^%r-*cu'j-u"u-uu' tfiru-uv. f2u-_ c >_; v* «r -J" J- v* *.* c -r c Z to c kj u. o u.

a *

cc©oc-;©©©r©o oeccccor-eccrccoor'r— ^u^r, c»-'c *-c — — —•-*——• — k • • • • • • u;C«, ^>yC'CC'ZO.Jt ZLDC c - u w u. u U l_ —

it ii ii u n n !< n n'

« ii ii it h h ii n » ii it it

LL < |l It i< ii ii n n l> II ii h n n m ti u O '

-u^—. — — «-—— »/:

, m m » •« *- —.—.— c^- —•"•-— — —»••— ^•~-*—» — —•"- u—•»—'——•— — — — ^»--*.».--.Kj^a; u _,c»/*._._.w_.«^»-»-—.K«— —• — <—'——•—.•—«»—•—•—•*-•— •"—•^ — u*w"?*CcC— C— — — — — — — in Q N Ii, U U >C-jc*—:u-X-C:a -.^^rccC—• c—— — —•—•-— - *^»/'>^ccc?*c._io. -u.rce»—•—• — — — — —

cock*rfuwi;uCfc'>c>>—^CCCSrr- jszil^c e C */>>H^cCH-OK»-wo.*>j_.owi:e uu.i_u-u.u-u.

trs*'i*'f>*> ifif»r, tf »f .i/

1 it if if ir *—< f\l «** ^ If

o «o * •*; <c

*N « c c -* tsi m *t \T\ <£ h C - CMT N C-r^ p» « cr «r <r a

coerccocc cori^i/n/»i/»wi/nrv*i/»wi/' u*

c-corococcecoccc^c2r^re?_:3'r72:r, 7'rr-'xi/ii/ivn/n/M^(/iwmin/iirviw/i«^

e c r e cZ 7. Z 7 T

r-ocecoccooo2 ~ -- r ?• z 7. y: z t. z\r %r */> i/> %s> iS> %r. is. wii/*u-i

o c o c c o cz z z r z t z\f %r «*» *s. v*> i/: trt

123

Page 136: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

o o c c o o o o c © c coocccocoooocir. j'Nctrr-Nri^if £ p* ec o* o — r\ r". c it * ^ c:i.^,«c<*iNf- p* r- p- r» r- p- p- r- caaeccxcrcc(n r\: rv tv i\j r> im r\. rv cv pnj pv.- r. f\!f\:(MCv.A;f\iru(NicviA rvo c o i

r c o a <^ o cocccccoc © o o r

cc r-c©cc©OGC

(M K (V CV C\! (S; (N f\ir\,r\ifN»Psjrsjr\if\jfM(> .

o o c c c o c c * oocc occc^ooocococoococooooocooccoocooooocco o

I o o o oO — (\! fc- e c c

1 K (M N C© © o eo o o oc c © coccc

r o © © © © © ©ti^«h o- c © —rv r. rv rv f* rv r^ <^ o o o c o r ioccc o c o i

r c o c o c c '

o c c o o o o <

c C © © © C © <

(Nj f, tf V <£ P" CO O O O f o oo o o o © c oo c o o o c oc c c © © © co c o o c c o

1 1-. fi ir r, r (ft ci ioooooooooto © O © © © © C © iOCCCr CCCC<cocoococc*ceo

r\ rvi Pvsv\p. • • — j

cm rv, <\> (\ ;

If U* lT L-- I

o ou ©

© *— X

~ w <-•

© o o »c c IT

Aa. e *v »/?UUC (Aa c u- • >

o o o o• • • • *ooooccco cooc*

C O O C O O C O C II it (i (:

H II M H II n ii no — — — — *£ *- — •-

-. •- — — — ~ — — — lAtAvJCa— — v-> G— «-. — ^.^- — ww — */-, ;> o a l' u 'j. r^cCi/tszu>dC>^Ki-a H ttiLi/<>c a^o nu.uuccilicu<cC3t-H-p-acirctecc- l_ a c_ c: o.

«»».#.* in «. >.i>crcov>4 + + *cooocoooo • • • •_!• • • • • • • «co©©<zzu-u.ooooooooc: • • • #»-<»- ^ x• • • • • • • •t-u.'Liu.CaZZtr

_j _; _i _. — -j — • • • • C c a: t• • • • — — — ~ t^ - i- k t-

^.«~ — — — — »- — — — — —.»."*|l H H B IU

_ _ _ — — _ _ — _ i^ !/ i_> c 'r?ViUCi^CZUa-Ofcr, >Ca=>ZZU-u>Z

Ki'h-ceceee.ccffie: a z z t/i p-

u.HLwu.ii.Lu.u.tim.^ti L" a. C£ C O

v» %r. — i- » X tr L» ^ — c <5 tr. »

> *N. U u < >I I 1/1 Z" l_> XK K u.* rv X c D 3 <X < <

c c rs« o X _j _jer a ©• -X <c r V o IT. X rr o t/i T A

1 L_ u. a: (PI > c H -£ tn > v:c < C <•. t^ C ia

3 K ^c ^C n f^ c ^r 2 z Vrv c c z* > a - 3 z: ts c

t~ LL L- u C or a z C3 X c u* l' X

«? O c X ^ C o a o Cu. D CL. p^. e

1 3: c 2: c fM <• —i c c <fv X u~ o o or -i X

i£ i' c IL 1/1 •f <• «3 u. c c f-in IT IT. IT 21 X C O Lt K If Z

X. if IT C c t* * X 2 c C u.5- c - o c o u. V. >

c ^v UJ U. m X 2o o (\! 2 a tr 4> (N D r^ r- a. K c K a

tf o C 4 e m <cm f n 1— c«- a X u m f X11 2: rv -o i: V. < z IT

-c * c 3 c £ < 3 < -c •0

r- a L C U. i' C C t— c C cU L_ <r u. u c: u. C c r (J u; U- <r t- c u < u. <:

j Q o. y X 3 h- T yCl fN. C cr CE a

a. c (_ c c; C u. LL u. a C C U. cr a CL c a. Ps s U ^

3 u- c *" " "" 3 _ (Ni

i- ^*" W "" " ^ u. — X

rsj

X X I> I-- J u.

-K*»(TKc-r-ifS^.«if f- a- C c —aO-ffaaOCCOO— — — — — — fv r\;«-——— —•PMPv.^.r^irvrN.psjfM fMrMfvfjfMccoccccocooco cooco<v rs. f^' rsj cm ps. rs. rv **• o pnrsir\jr\:<\j PMP\,PMrjr\ji\jfNjccoc cooococzzzz zrrzzzz*Si *S> <S> iS: %/) ts: if* tsi iS" ist tst

h- i c — r* >*po m m *r J- *pv. fy (V pnj M p\i

o o o c o o

iT<£h CJ ^ -* -*

f\. rv. cv. ps.coco

124

Page 137: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

:•> v ^- i. —

r- t/» •—' 5" Irt x•• — c: -j-

A • - —LJ X * •C*K |

I- » OC -

—- X »

I

u. x a *

o on

a c

-- a a x

-ex •

.-*<-. - •

! ML »- fs* tt«

. (- — — — u-; z • a. - •>

T" -* * x xU »- K — C

,£—>%.- * .

— c* •-

A - X -\r < •£ \

ci c • •o - • —e • ar

v x »/. —* * _1 x

o o — —

k »- r* — o

: 1/1 ~-• tC »> -j x

Of- ~ —

; Z • -*

3D <, « — — »- K-

I -— "l

— —. r ,r-i „r

II 12H C C,

Z iT O U3 * — —C — —u O l. u

t- r» — x • >

^ » — it e: i

3 •*> u* — u.o — > t- »ic; ll h < x ;— t- * y *x

'

— — aa. or C

- » * i

b- x • •i z r. -j —

> • u *IL O 7 X

, — . u. • rsj

i o - er. * *r» >. u x —fi\ V DO- -

: * \g » i•

• ^ — . . •

C *- I

L»• •— <— C i

a a c — u

m C C C

! ti. U. UJ ** Cz e

n z ;

1*1 »*» -* »l_J Li. ,

2: oe

— — U- Z Z

I Ik < X I*" *- t- ^ u c *• — a • _i >, o. C "v - *r

^t rvi fn

• li i

I »-- Z

C C C ~ <_> I r. c; c — *:u. C7*"L't'i

C — — — — CL — CL '

. er C

— I I-

> e. •—is> _i x a- o. - o-. — o

— — CM f- «T

• c> — <£ II

-"» < 2 — ^II C N UJ X

*- 3— U~ ... g N- — 3 —a l u - n* 3 •- o a — ~

t oc r o^* *- — « p. « ^o c O <• — — •• I

• • • w ^ (.» t* I

IU.U.U- — cz • • — ;

• • c -j: » C- + * r*i

i h- k h r*. ^ o *- H f izrz * — *-uzz •>ID*— II D^rs-cC- J>- ZCC — l

I C lb b z • ii.U il;

c

oz -oU-U.X UCL.ii.0t_)

'•• — S — u ~ •- x —

cr o — <^ it- ^•

At Kj ^. i\i cvi r*i

c r e o o a

a c -- i*. in «c

m «c «c <c *o -c

r\i tfv f*; <M r. <N.

o o C c o r*

^ a c — <** tr CKorC'NjmJT*<^-^^ r* f* f- c er. «?<nj r\. ^- f\ f\. <\. m rv Pw r\. r.- mc c o c c c occocc

acceccDcc cocrcrcooocooo oooccoZ Z Z Z 2 Z z z z r z z

v» ia *r. i/> <fl »/)

J 25

Page 138: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

PI

*» c o o e c c c o o r c o «> e o o ej- r"f'pht'ftr'a> «r6?ttcK-tt ,<r«t«c«

p CCcooeoco. coorroeca crrcror-cerec. ceSrccoco cc-rcococcoccc

c -j - •u N. • X*- c -j *r

x **. •

V • x •r* X . |

* X •»• •£ C

ATr> E X

J*' ** • c -

< u.

c -

V X . —• — V *

x - -«.

. • » . |

K • X - •T. A <\. _l —u_ y • v «> =>. O -n. — a at x i• I IK • <M s-C e- • • srk « s. x — ««u;<. — —* v s . i - i,

c ir — —n t- — —» r- > *_. . f < e*<: nCy— — -»- eeUUJ2 .• t- ~ — —t e c — —li-cc

< v »v « . r-

O- — . _i to <c

u. u. u. — a j»c o o c u' 3• • • <t e cx r s- —iig 6 1 £ = .a 2— — — f-e-Si-a: c zcu. u. u a u C k- - - I - ,_ v.

— e —

Z — IL

Siu. u

or coo — — -...»- t-^ f f Cl w |Vt #T f> f*> fToccor ccccc %/•

z z z 2 r 2*222 £,1/1 »/ f< i* |/» W) IT, </> V iVl w>

O — —

126

Page 139: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

> I M

c <

I ftZ u.

« <rc <

&3

K 3

Z Ur •-

Ui <B Ki X.

•• r»- t- a:<-oft O UC -I VIe u.- —OCXo• V* u.O U St

C •'

T «•> »K C _Juj —

-

•-

ft IT JC

a "a L- |3C "»

U — •»

U ft *C CI I

o •»

v» ir ->

I cUl f I

-I < —« J

w - c« - V- ui "

ia I — — — > yW I ^ * W. U< <— I w — u- _i u.

»• I ft > <if- l <<« r-— t J i- c *e I u I —I. I u> a *• t- c*• i iiv^Sb:U I T Z. — -i •-« j — <e — _« i < u c c r« ft C ft ft

U I X C -i VUK*u. I < C o — a- I •- 7 U. t- U-

— i c u > r </.

M I F2<»a

C C I

ft- X ',

— I> sr ft

z

J 27

Page 140: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

c a. »- s:. u > t

c i- t *-

C < t V

u.u. uc — »-

p. •» — c < .* *- metric Mfcirttcocif. o-ffi^c *•< ere < o c o c — irpe.pc.-xf'rr *r ^ r * a ir, h c •* o ee r* — cr - v» cr c m r. it cr ^ — rier«f*r»-C'et<— c * ^»rw c r* -* — C ft*

I rrcr**1 — c-c-^-c^^-etrw. cr»cc^.*'.^^-**c a a c — ^.misfci/^-^cr— < „r *~ *" •• CI»«-MMf«ir<("M<»iroffC!(re«r' * f* is. *j r> ir — c rrt-*^^ec---ifi,'iC-

j<- — n m c *• ir* c c — ft * <l -t ** * ** -• -* ^^•-<ro<v*v** — -< •• ~

I

mt h i^ o> or m a iriv^r^ft;* ft* ctv.if\o-«c «•*!»••-«? »c r- c *c*4<&<?*c«r*?-- c- c * * C it r, ft fyI iririfiifCa"C- N\c^"-ccc^ifif>^^^\rh r;ft.#r>,f*crf«.ftft:c«r«*'*»ftft.*ifft *c .- cI • • • • •

i ccMfff-'vjifffM'--'h ifs'rccf'err r- <c <a t* c it- c it. r» * <» cr ir. if* iv <c ft * c — c <r <\

I»r r\»riv.ir~*©*ya h *x er ec © ft. © — cr if iv. c * »* r* a © p c ec ir. if if r < t* cirirtr^c<Ci* f

l r c^ff^^'<l^^Wv*l/^<c^^lflf1 -J(^l^^ cr. ~* o (?• * fM a if *i>»*"c-*er. !/ s < e s» ^ h ir if if

Ift.ftf^rifs r'»frr*i*>*j,*'*j-»tr. r\>f|Tiftjft** — — =- — — — r^ ft. r» t\, c\, =- r\ <v — — <\ f- <">j ^j r*. f

I

I

c-*<^fvU*N 1ch »c p- c>t^ n \* ^ c r P1 <R r* 9 -• a c © © —* f* %c »- ft © ft. ft: — cr f is. ft. e *?

l r ir r m w ^ c c -^ifrMs'^e- c ir **•• rr *ir Ch r ^ (« \ir c r * n c c ft ft * a ?• «c .# in;

t • ••#•• •

I © f**ir*»*tftft»-»*mcccc(Njft.-<**©e©'*, 'tft©u' *o p* * if »r \* p< ir * ir m c c r. *f — \r m. enr cI

^— •-irccc«fecio^(^orecccoerirr><sfnr, i*.»rccccr<if»if^r'<c»»ir^^*rO'j:frrr'

i C tf* «* it ir «c if ©ccisjr. r-.ifi<c*L©©^«r,?irr-ft © p* — ft *» ft s*MNCNCMf»r or r~ r if •» «»t f\i ft, r- t* r> fft^^rv!«j-*r^'(^fsjf\,p''ft.rv1

»- — — -- — — r, r^ rv. rs. —• cm —• — »• <v. ft; ft. ft; ftv

I

I

©*cr*ero'ccir.4'ftj-««tfft n r ^ r ^ o cr ft "-e^egft^Cfftft:-- ft; m ft «<*-«? cvftiftcccrir .»**«—

i -•©ftoccmc^^-ifcr-if^eft -Nirc'«oirwrc^\*itifCT(ti'r*cr»f'rirv«cif<i©air«i,fciftcr*r*rif-ftfti<?ft-.*a. ft r ,- c c f croTM"ik -*-^rCTP'-ir-4*, i'*"'e'

1 ircr^h-cu^cr^ir^-mh-o*— ccr*TN^»---*f> fviif»(T, o«rfMrjCif'*tfr<Pvu*. ccr*u c o- — a- —I-C -Itm 4C " IT *« *» If• ft.' ^ ft -*W0h «t^-'l»»NK*-NffClf f« »* C »T ft"

l— «- — —ro c -c — — w < rt u-.

u. S t

u. > c i ^ ff n wcce »t ft tr or r, - -- r -$ ft c c » * in m <f u" c c < ir o © © #\. ft © ft, © ^ i\i ft: ft o •* »r ft »fC ft- X i c< CO * - «* co *r *c — < — cr © <, © c- ir ft ft; ©©<*<-*©*»** --rvec^ec a ir. ce cr <m «r < ic

r»-v i-i r ft « ir c *f e * O c -1 c < i* <o rvj. * ft. © © *»i ** — oft-c^-^ri^-cr". -* — cmtcf-<**p f

DtAw i © c © e © c — -* — © e © ft. ft © © * © »v ft. © o *- © n — o © © © .- r rv --*-•*©©©©©©©©o2 a i ©co©©c©o©©©c©c©©c cc —©oc©c©©©©rcc©©©©cr crcr c*co• U. X t ••• •

u.*-c i oecooeeeeeoc©ccr*ceC'C©©coccc©ec©cccc©c©creeoec

o ©c rc cru ©

lb t ceoecjcopi-^enc © © cr o rv c o <v c r c ivKrcNOC oeonir. ocotwcpceel. ^*r | is; a ^ ee<r c r r c -vt ^^ *r cccft.*-*—'i^irr- f m n* ^r* crt^c cri\'eca.*oi*— crer^airC<e> i c<ro>r<^crc<£(ro'r r-cr-.tir^^'r'C-ersJCf*: ^ ivic ^ c m a r ^ lp«^'C^-»fc^ --r <c<eo<cZa^l ....#...— z> c I

rrir^irc -*irtr--cetc i i — ^ ^-^^.— ^*

pCmcc.-CC —^^-ftiCC ©ft,CT -*C r- f. pm cr ^ ir- <r c *^ l" it m ir er

l-i^ t ft'ccft^creEftjcft'ft**'^^^ — ftcvci^r*^ — rftCC>ocercft-if^c, cefNirh inf'i©«c«-ftr»U IL | CM If ft* !*• IP © ft! C ^ © © •* CS. If. < CT CC © p* »ft C © f* f. C © C «L- -* ** ** V « ^ IT •**

tf*- If © IT Ift <, «C IT ©CX I ©CC—©©Mrv^*0©©ft;mCf-TC;ft*'«'C'© — Oft: — O ©©©-*© ft' —• if — N © © © © © © © CZUI ..t»» • « •3i I C©OC.©C©©©C©C©©©©©©© — ©C©©©C'©©©CCOC©©©©CC©e©©C©a — I

If! *A

X Z

a ac cu. u.

£5

It. u.

* tr. | ^cc^^l^cu, fPnl^ ClflOCf^l^ONl^ll^f.^^cc^, Olr«, ec^cocOlf^l^« ir\ir»r\?<a I a^tflM^1r•-Mrffro^^plf^^^^^^^N^l^4<^^. cffO^^ClP-tf•ccc, ^'*^^^^f^^— a=l • •

a c i I — — — . »w

I

_; I

< v I

U \Li |

— oCL —

cccccce~cc-ooccccc— cc — ocececcoc cocooe-' — ccceoeco

< 1

C 1

C 1

E 1

« 1

*- IU 1

* tr. i

u r i

> 3 tu? 1

-- n ri ^ ir * p* cpc^NnijWNif'ho'o © -- ftf i^ •* it. * h- cco, ©»-ft;mj-tf»*ft. are©--iv,fv+if

128

Page 141: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

PC< rv C cr *e c^ n r C iT fv j- e

ifi C (s; f^ si f. ^- C %r ITr u — u* C- f^ — er x *r

C r\t * |T.~ t* ~. --C •= Ik

C K- I-

IT f. */"-

cc m n. u- ,$ r- r- <r

i •

1 «sj cv <, r\ — ct~-o

I if ^ c ^ .^ r. i" it( eg cm _ ,- — ~ ^- _-

(

I

ccir rv i- r^^ccI ** p c c «t (* ffV)

I M (Mf Oc c — s: * cur *£/ c <V r* ira: u.- > & L" y IT. C. fv CS H- U. CJ fv <M —O u- a -fi, »1 t w .

«; r- <r cr it f o irL_u. u o r- cvj -C C — Cc_ — »- »^ — rv. f ^ C — ecZ T U. m u- pn C IT c cr

d r u IT *t rv; C c C -J

a uu. ^ - IT fV tv -*

> c (M m c r*j — r <. -J- — U.t- I v* rs «C C rv; <r o, — to u.»- *-*

. c~. m f, c fM u~ c -J- u. — u.\r \r o %) -- m rv. c I V*

c or nc o o cZ X —— *.- COO f c «-" c c o c

u. i c c o c c c- c> eu. *- */>

| cra'a-ffcrcCJ < a I rcoofCC»Li- c =>Z2 ^ C I IT IT IT IT <*" IT U If

a e X l — - —

L? X I O-Cr-f-c-C-^rv,Z l» I

r z i eoc. ccoc-ctt — I

ki* I irociTCooirIT < a. I r\i 4^ v r- it o w rv•-C.3DC1 I — — -• —

«: tri

<"* a r- ry rr» *j- ir- cct- u. Irx ooci^ — ece— u |

« z I

a. — I

i" I • •>>|e«-*?—r\,f.~ir

tt «l I —c c I

or |x-vO.£.c>rc*r,c

I

< I r>mh (r c v> it cC i rv; rv r< r**

I

c I<~ o c- r e r- c-c

» I^__^^_

a a nu- u." o

t: d. a u-

c tr

t- c_ c «« — — I-* »- »- o13 < « l^>. -J -J —

•-ct: -ic z r- cC tt &

_j 5 C •:

c c c c

I

z c.U.1 I> su. z

129

Page 142: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

— a cthiin *< <t* f\. «£ C G .- p%. r*. if tr e ^ p. *% «r — < *o er r f* o--CMf-t-c>rc * rs. <, pm if* c r — it p* — p- *\.— c u p- p ht k a* C *r — if p cr f rs. <£ if cr *• cr pi c acre C if C w* ifi i*i i* ff- p> pi «r e ry; r>- p* -< p ecencr*'jrp.—C fNi *N: *\: c*j <" f er- 1.1 — <** c if rv. cv e ?•»-•- a. o — c c p- a r*. — C cr •-* cr if• r (/ c >w c r* - er. *t<-e. c -r ** *c or p-

*\. p> »r — .i- w p> *rCf"Ps— a *£*• r r\: p- cc -p* *c f c* p"» *v t** ** p* cc jr. —* c a, it c p* p* ^ O e. «* f* P- if if #n <t p*; »^ *p ^ Cfiif cr P*. iv pr ^ cccr\^m\CNCirr-*-NMfff ^ p\; ^ nn- r\ — r- x <r u- r- f. pi p- if — — C ~ PC~ — «C P- — ** ,y i/s pj ^ P*,

sf (« r cr •- ir c « p"^ *o c\i rv *•—*.» ^ p* p> »r if m «c o *r U" rj u\ t/ p< pt- if r\» pj c * cr p> o <o ift c r r if mt <r (t c ^c pp r *f c w «s <r ^ •* m ip p- * r. f.

p- it ^ c h iriPs'p-rco^i^ffC^ft * pi a- e cca^sc^crcfvc^^^*ro Cf»p^scu-cp\*<cp »0 <*- p»j oc *c <f c ir l- c *c i.- c c a c r p- pir^ircMRk'SPrarir, if cc «y p- if cr

c < o — — rfs.pt.p^oc'<-'r, »r -*•-*? c- rvee c cc — -'Occc--cp».-*p^ — •rcc-cceocco^^-tr^'C

in ir c*r .-. pv p** p-tr*CPx:< c r, if -j ccf p**tifpcip^ecp>cr * p* c cc ff ^ipn*r(_— c nTo-cc cr, *c p- pi p. *ru* it k C C rv p^ * — if — l- p- p-. rv ^ p**p» p- ^ p r^c p- <*. <. p </ if it- c — r* — c«r a c it r C' xt-^i; rN«rpi c cc — y oimrN

<r <r p- — c e if a. i* c coc--*c*c<Cfvc, cccc^ecP"C, r r/-"-<"'r*ifC'CCiPC>^o:rc-<NC arc*

c p- p- err- if* «t c< c c c oc^-p r^ccfiMPMC^-c-cc^Tfp^'^ctf c p- c c> e c b r n ^ o— C < C ^f*C* C CP — P. C a^C — <c— if* *V *-IPC NC- •- — P*1 * C!*Pl^

pv ec — c cnp* -t crpcf im p*t c c* p- c-cn t*, crpico, «ccc»- *n ir. *r •*- %» »r c ——• cc *r p» aif.ee u* c — c op •jcd c -* cr ui * Nocff^-tccif «o p*> i* -* c p^ p*i C-

cr*.cciftfcorp>jccc.cop*\p' •& •£ r ooercocc»«^^pjc^c«— o^CP-*eifCi **c«f»rpicce, p**' <c eo *r cr p cr- c p *•* cr o e cccer p.

1 p•p^*ClfC'Ce^c.£e^^cci ^, *£***** ceir. p*. ©fecop^ce* cu »r ^- obc %• p -* (p c or p*j -^ — on p> »- -a p » c if u* ** ~* o »*: c «c

—=

rv — r\. r*, ^ — vi- ** INi 1*1 P* If

p p> p> o- IT c p>- cr C p- r*i cr r*. c c ** c PU nO c PVJ <M M P •r — M e **• p. p> Ml a o- «? »r p- u* cc

* er ifi r a P u- T r* p p> er ^ 0^ p- P- J O r» PM cr c* f vt p- «J PI if er -j- a PV »fp> w (x <*. *u f»*j p» V «* >^ PN] >T fNi r%, u> (f <c *J p- P» ^ c- PNi u P'

**' c r ^ «C pg c «T ** c c c p. 6" o- c ^ C e> c p- C c p. c — c P* •*." cr c If f ^ c p- p^ »r p- o c O IT If p* r* *o

T c if c if o- O o- if* c e o •c w cr p*' „

.

era r- c- o ^ o %t PI t> c c v. CC *o Ifl *r *r *r p*. * C If C P- a. pi o c _ *6 *£ p~ «1" * rr\ •j pn p^ »» •C p- p^, <-r* »r p*i "" "~ — *~ PJ <N •* f" CM rs.- p^ PV- "- — —

'

— '- pj w —

cr p- p r rv e L" <t p^ oc P* *r .. cr if —. o* »> c if a *t C . C ro <C P. _^ w ^ if 0" ff cpi p ^ -f r*j C r^ vt sf er -r cr o P p*\ a- ^,

if- c P. c 0- p. p.' cc a g" if <e> * L" <" r c < pi •J- c r r» r- pfi Pi c c c p- c c ** c p* p-. nC cr c c: Pu »a i- p o -* * If o c e cc cr *M C* C -* p- ^ ^

C o pi >r C rv r. * r'. c o c C: a. P* en O P. o »» p^l o o ^5- c p- •c ft Ki o j- ^. r-. ^ p- «c ^ C pi o p-. c <r •r *n c o _ «r PC If Pv—' P" * rsj if if c pi CO «S cr If ^ p *" " c

— cc- <r n £ <• if — p* er cif* — r^ i** or* o ^ i*> — cr o** -if p <»*%f^ p.i»fO —'ir c r, pp *c— c crpi er «r if •- *c if o c*o pvjitpIf- ^ C- P*JCS]< CP'^.C*^ —' C7- fA op- P-IT fP*C*P1f*>P" p-ec pi*o«»*

oca-p.*crcif'r C'rcifNrp*erp-o»cc cr»<cif, »cccc<c^)op**o'*»f*--«ccoccpifcrcpj*«c<rocc «c -* in c «c — p ooci"CNrrcirtcoiffntpecCB'NC'CiM«if'"CcccoNooo<«»''irc

<f ir r> ecp-er cc>c--c•^*c iap* pgrMCC*«-tr-* pgpw o^m^r— mm -4 —I -* (r,^*^(\,». ********** *m

c_*p>p- stp-*t c if ec if »- if r.- pj vo cm C'j-rprp- «v "• r^crxco a: pj rvto ^ ^^-pv--«r --if* *» *- «•• cc* #^c>*p-p> r>C r*p^*K

ocpsi-i-crc-p- c cp c c o a- rv f- c^ccccoccsrcocc^ ccc iircrcoccccccciprirtcccc*fp*.pncp»p- * c co'*'-'f»s ^---o*<»coe%jc«-«»*cocifi«soop'-»»«yj'ecccifiAOCC-«'*' «rvcctcp-cpi er er «v #p -* * -- r- ** crrp-p-LM <f oif t*<f

— psj — (-v. <N. c- — ** -• p^# & m *i*

c I *rifififiPL*ifif o^.cccvC'CP p p- P- h> p p-p«r aevcecetrr/p/o cccccoetrececc

or |

»- U: )

IT c. |»p*Jn*r^r*c^*^^-.^p•*^f*^eff'f'-^w*lf-»fPre> e-Nr*lft*^cffCp•^t^n*^f^^cDeP•-u-5. i

—. — .-M..--. — — — — rj f\* cm im is« tM p.. rypjrg»rti»ipipip-mp*fA pi fn*<t«?*«r*«r«f-<r<riptfi

> = I

130

Page 143: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Iet c

_j icr —

N. ) c ^j o f f- er c — KfCirccs' e p* »l p- •— c c. if ps

Iif e p- «y o <* ^ o- r <j c < - cirrh ^rrwt/

c* — if p- if — o er c ? *? iv f- eir<-i"^r<co ** p- c or

- C C~ •» r *f c >c <" Pv c *c f> — if * t p c < C f*

r (Mir ire ^Ccriruci/'rc-'itc^'i. e r

if ir »? c r ^ e etr* »C*- £"*(*• ~-f\,C— TCr'P <£>-•? IT *?

' C *f If O C C C C C — — — —' — O «" — r- — ?«•.-. — -. — — if i c c o r co

I * c

*/i • •

cr j — ~

\ p* pv a p- if o rv ^ «o e * iv r r- c - e cr rv. c ** a er r* Pirccc«r-.^Mr-^ff «c e ir id j c cl c\» rr p- o c ». ,j p- i

I NCa c - —'irifro, »*<£phrff'Bi coxtfif>ccf\.p, *r<.cp*. c-^c^cfp-cirf-irt/cctf^^ttc*— rv^-ii— f\. p.' f- tr —r^cc c "«• — cp b < *r w ~> <v .t. c c rv — ^ * p\ pg — i\,f* f\if\.*c«c.L" rs, pj c *v — f». «v r-j c o a u* "-i m

a i ccr. c- c t- — ^- — coc — — or nc" f«r cc cccrc o o o c ~ c e- iv c c c. c- c o c c- c — c

_. * -r

v. <N erC •

y if\ c* •*

n ir— Ko m

Ip- .r p- er — a — er —

<

ir <c C -* *T- is it

I•- p- a u ^f-r c «*" v* if- .j- if r\ n —

.

i-* p- j c nit ir p- *r p* n a i* c a « h —

I— if o -s c f- r jf1 c r c w C if

r — if* if c e »j . ^- rf ~ — c cr r er — ir ir r-

_ — cr. ^ ff — -jirc^u"CK j- — pirc^rs^— -tc p ^ * a c .i, ir c c f p-

<r a if c if. p r- c if ir er. ifS-ITsfPl»i-if -CC

IT. KCNNOCC X cr *«>

rr if. cr p- if i~ «* r *? «c ^r^ — — c «? r ,c o ir c r-

pg * rv C C ^ if IM %0 — ^

< c ^ a c

I <m *r p^. *o o p- ir-'O^-^rcci''. cifrcc <\v*»-«, rco'ocr»^«^ *' c •- if r- ire-<r\.rs.c-*'k irKrC* cc

ifr, ,$,— <», p- c »* f •» c •-''Cc^-c c rv. *c r\; p" ccr^'if ^rcrc--f* CojC *t(m*lc oc * ir N* - r r. »t »r if w c c if —

> cr

I •^trer— « f. ^.rgfrr- iff- c ~- — tr if rv (ncp- t;; p- — c ^ »r •»* p* rv. x if — * n <(' «r c i c. •«» rv p*. o if> t- * ** rv f» cro

I *» c — f- Pg f r-

I-< -> ff fM If

P- C (M **» if . *J- C C^"-TOC03"rr. r^iT'CfC if-if if\ i

'--fS.py ifrv.' -* •*• i— — ^r— if. active-if cvr\,c~*-«r*.X<C* o *f

I r» C *f C ^Oi*^ <r »f O — O ir r. er L" — c — if r r-.w * * fi cf if> x CCifI i* er rr. •? •i^.-* r r nC r. r- (M^ X if if C f* wf-«K rif'CC* IV.' is: ** **

—I <L «. «T u y»r-«> — — u- c — uiu »x * M. a H.u.-r*«tr-u-*i««*f\ »* u**.-*'<|Or**r-Of. COIACC'C'CK. M" cc- c<TO COCO ^r-rif*uu-f\.ift,-^rMrr-p-cr if- »TPjC O O ff if'f

c it <». c if a or- c -- rv <

I ir r * r * i

It ^ * cr f-

I c c ec if m r> cif cerfMP^c (V' c C1 c — ir -* OC^^^ONCir. x c. rP f» is. if iv ^ ^rv crv<— r\»- C<— r.> if if c \r o <* er o- — — ir -j x* r\i c-oa ^ a — ^ ^' cxoroifp- oc %fCe (socerc— cc p c mt e »v < r .<(> r- c^ o ^ N * C O C'p e ^- «v *r

cc oiv mIM O

><c

IT o

r1

o o— -

I <m iv cr, or i^<f a r- p* rjp>;if.cc ^^rjvjif^o cxiff- J^ o •* o? if. r- f. r> it ^- n c «r ^ »• «o < c n ff e ^ ir - h c c «"

ccmifi^iC^n^Cf'C'ircc^ nimi* o, rv-*'p"Oif^r.«-'^err».ifirprvr'^CiNiCC^ifer. v* ec c \* ^ o--teriMX(N.L^ir »if if c r r. op-o^oo«o*fh-o«r«jecf^— rs.^r-C'C. ec^-oecprarvrh-fn c> p c C P h •* iMCPr*^(\ieCr*tf^«»— OXfviMO xrsixec^ifr.f^ivwrn(rfnxifcerr-^r^crpvifv:Oh ift^rcr-c it cc *tn h p-xr* - ^. c O1 r r nlf\«pr 1 fv*Olf^'(N.— —'f-cr-C^r^sTO— — oif^^^rNjf^i^cr^^^^^^rrof^^PV— x*ffvier--—'--'*t7v »-crf-nir, r'%ts*i', 'f i0t<oc' rci»if»nf< w « oc *r — r*-. »» a «— ^<*)ifsj-^if.fs.*,r\.pric ^ -r - im m r, * iv s* (Ma <mr^r^d ^-CC C.'INJO ^"^-< r* mif, inj •— *n •- —* p-M*-'N>^^-*Wfsi

r* -^ IM <V —

«

<M —•< M (T N ff * f. ff MT * pi If C ».* L". * N N -• C C (7 *t -- If. lfif\lfifC*»-- ifCCP^C"— P-rv;'J''*CCrr-(M(7>rM--lfeC%Jc— ^oif^-f^e>fcr»t,if—• r» c r\iC— rvi*fif. *vr in C rf. <f cr O c—'MrccCirif-j^ccrcmC cr - c c^* n r.irr*^»r ecrv.-cr(vpnej*MC'<'--cpr*'m f*-' — «-'«*"r''wif*ro'^-fnp-) (Mrr'. r*r- ^co u" < >£ <rj c pv <\' m x c o — vr iO «

> j^•^^-^^^^•r^^^^^*p•^•^-^^'^^^»^-^^^^ ^^-r-^^.p-^.^-^^^p*^p-^^p•^^•^r-^^-r*r-^**

I ir— h ,f r r i.' f - ir-Cf- CO — cf. p-p- f^ CDC -if. ir-f'r C> '0ffvT^*lfOif-h C^p- O C — M«mr ffOv* ifC N — — — <ni <\. ro — — — — f^. ^v (% .-^w*—ipgrvipvcv "-«--*-«-fjfvjMrni cmpv^

C I *iMf.if»ririfir<*o<oc<*r ^^^^^^^^^^'^^(^c:aeffftt•cfa•c'fffo ercrocoooccc oT I — — _____ — — „

I a I

I CMf*"i ZCC | i4Nm^|A4^(0PO^Mn«in4hCPC^Nin*riAiCr>V(>O»*tS!K\^ir<h(Ctl'CMN(ri^tfi<CNC<rZ ec 1 Mr.u.r I irif> z>

131

Page 144: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Ctrra »c c f r *$ «\« m c **

a u> «t rv nip. a c *• * i*. « kc o r*, ~- c\j c —• — — c c — rv — — — —

f» <• f * «f. IT IT- rx> rv, o:

c — c Cf-cocccco-' — c

« «l 6; C< MV C f' • .1 n C if P^ereicrKh-^co c c ec if- *j

rvr\.crif*~-f;— cn a rv.- or. c k— — c r. c c r c c r

* fs N r r- or ^ir -c N *.' f*. e a.

C r- rv if (• V* if

c o r r c c c r

s I occccecceocc coc ceecoeooeccooc c ceec cocorercoeccoceeece

*- j »ft — o m er »o -cr^fv tf r- ^ c — r»k. ) »- f». or if- <cc m o >f• ir «r it «0

v I c c c c o c — •* •- e< c a f\< «\i c- r. r

«

<c o * c — e> o ifNcrvj — c < cm c cr «* if- »f eciff- fS. r-f«. fu— MC-ic, ^<-- ^- r- (\j is, —~* r c f c o o o c o c c c c — c *n. c c> c c c o c o r c c

to v' r . r u **

<• i* i- — < vc ^ c c c r.

o c c. c c c c ccc ccccr cccccc r c. recce c c r. o c o o c r- c r. c cceccoccrcc r r

e f o o a r* n*. r*. n r c c </»r ir orc^c ir *; n. ec- C * ir ^» * — tr *c -- ir ** r- r* e f*. r*

^cr-r-f* N*rtr c: < o ir> <o or: <— rv c r h if r»— ce«iCr^crc ir «v c ** Mr>« r- c ^ r-

f- if rv o if* f. c c if (r p. * .re f*» flir*^^ rve.erptriPif-^i>- r- c- c «c * c c r* rv <. r-cc^.rsnor<Njrorcov*fv— — i\crjccc e c c o r- o c — •- c r« — — — — r. ccccccro — — c- c c c c

cccecccoe coccecor-cocce cec cccocccc. ccr rceccrcoccrcrcor. o

t •

| IN*

oc«f-x*»r crif. -* «« or a f* *r. ec «e m o *. or r» »c»cock*vco-nn r- •*»£« < «\. r* o- or e —*-ivi\in recer or r*. c »r *» rv if. rv .- r «•* -* rv m •* i»i — n r <c-< ** w r - c IPC f>c i»coc^ocmvih ccc^^^cifCMfC ceo — occoc— rr — nc#c cc c c eeeecc * r c c r

coccccroccrccccocccce c ccoccccoC'OC-cccooeccccccc c c r oc c c

c I • A Ca V. E

(— IL

| <c «? isi tr •£ fit ir. rv «v ir ~ *? r. if. *»r. cc<c*orNCr\^>^rf*pf«>i*Chc or. f^c^ccr-rvoc^N^e«C'»tce'fc 'fc, o«CirNC itkh — * f».'**fn — ff*fi^eNCircvirr.coirNorcr*r.rf. c^'^-^cr*—• e* — * c? r %*

| v o u <t< u> h. lt — r\, u - — f i u r r\ — (\ r^ i. 1 u. ,j ^ *, u — *. u. — u- vi, u. i — •— rf* r f i u -j- — u b; «j <ti <d c « b 4 f* o nI «»— — ^r.:*crr^rvN<— r^irr*uo — c^r^<;f^irir*ccPcru''Crc;e i h if * r o * ^ r c w * cr n ^ it c c s* s*l • •.•••••••j or n - cr ** c cr a c - c ^ •a-troc cr^a r c ^ ^ ire i" «f it f c^ er a" c ir. t* v- t* ctn cnccn o.c ir ^ -- rr. «*» i*

4 w»

| ^ p<n ^^r(M-* - -< is. *\ — — m —

cri ift#s,cr«jrri*»Crt'oro'^^c<v;ifCC7'Nffc <Nif ncn r ^if --^-coaec^N t n \ « c c * r. r\. o r\j a %c a. c r. r* '" <t

cifMC-^evc^^fs.f«^c-Crf <M--ifN c «*«ci*<»>c^irC*(C<rr,> «*<*. n ^*-nn <Cv*cNf. n »r —• f^ < »r> ir ir r*cocro^ON 0-eccc c it r,* *- — ^ n sors.rve ctTOfvCC r. *? m c c <v> *- c «• r- c--»i c if if - o r* p- it <. c <f c <. y- ir y - r- c cc -r a. v- — -l< ^ lf^^o•o:(r•:(^^^ c «cr- c <r f> - it h ^-n cccn r^*rirfs.or-c «c — ir

•4 M —• P* —

i

— -« — 1M

cms mf^C1 #wmpoep if c o COO rr. — cc -- r o oCCC> M <•" IM fNJ -* C «-< 0" r: 1*1 — ^^l«l if- K C'^'^Cf'iN!* rof? iriftsfi ^errvtf^ c^ ^ a^-c ^m —• c c ^ -#ccp^ONC^, H^coco^''C^ nciM^cc'^Cf^fvoocfsjO'. r^«h ^>n cc-

; — p*o^»-^rco*s; — oo^-o»-c cccc

ir- r1 <r ^ ^ n,* a <\ — -- r>_ ^ ^ r er c

C-- — CCCN >tf in» r- C I\ !•".

-ccoocccccocc cr»r. cc-ccoocoeeccc

OPOif,— oc n nee ^fwevNN *r»r a <vn«it c >eor — c * it. < ' c* **; rv- ccac

•-«-» — NNfSJ* «—»- cc r. N If ^IM»rfS, If C -* N IA J--*' NCIPM C Kr * c p< ^ a; m r cooocooocc Kr*»ror*\.

O O O O O C — — OCOOHfCCNC — fMOOCCC'OCCCCOO-*0 — CNOC C OCOCCOfviCinCOC c

*rirv\iririru-4r«<o^o>o«c«c^«N n r-NN»».r.Ntk h'N r»-i crorececerocC'O'Crc O'crcrccocccccrcc

i- lb {

U. ZI

U 7 |

132

Page 145: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

I c f- ir — «c ~- n o l~. tr. ir. w r* r~ i^ t* * cc c in n k>c -/> er> r\ c r - if a- ^-ccrrc\?-^r:«:ccca -r — r- rv er — —i— r* <*• c c ec if — c if c « c - -f r- Cf^ ir c r* if. -c c ^coc-o- orxjcvccrvr-ccr-- — ^>rtcr*ij'^— <? \r *• *s tr

—ii c-rrr »f<o<''p^rn^Nif.C'if»''if'C»,'C(^ — r •* — * — i\, m *r o «c c if K (\ — r*> — cmiff-c-tf-^-cnv.— im c — <\ .-- —*v I CC— O O r. O O C ccr (\OC0rs 0r»'OOlf'C0C_,'O.r>Or*--0OCr-C«-r*COriCrCCC^:*'OC C CC C> C"01s i ocoacocooocooococoeooccccococacccooocococccoaoccocccc

i

l

i

<

t o* cm (v IV f- ccferTeropcf r- <f»<ii""«crf\j«y^-^f\io — (*"> (\i —< a (Njcnf*' r -* -t <r in - f- •- o c\j ^ — r- a. o it >r » -- cr

^

I c—* — rv'-^or^r^iMcr^o** •* — -^ «c." o f^* *t o o — c f\i-*~- — c— r^~-f*»r\ ^Hip«n^r>--.F-cC'j — t*- — — — •—

t ccoccooccc-ccc cc occcooccooooccocoocoococor- c c c cccr>ccrccW I•••••••••#••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,»•••••••••••••

x I rccccoccccocccoocoocccococoo coococooeccoocecoccorccoo

tp^a «^o«^o , ^(« > ^ jrircairK^^crcf' rifirhv-irrrr. — ccir*-xr(M — —•ifi^r, p-r\.cc^*cc , crj-cr,-C're *• c <j — — «r, if^cccccccu- cc ^ ir i* x)-«Sii-«fvii'f*.^ci; >rc v- »- if. ^ (•• m m ^ m r- c «£' f* r-ecr\.fi'^c;v*rrs.f^— c m t? -< r c c o o *r rv o c> orcr\.ocr-cocooon.- coooor.r»cc-*c— ooor-^ooocccor-coco*-ccc c c c o c or. ccr c o c c cc cocooccocccoooccoccccccc

f\jK(rcih>-Mrfi"- — (" f f\. *r ^ n -«ir**C'0'crfMNj--*-.f— cc^r-f- -j- -- o cr h- Chu-iccf'rr^-r'MfCf'j^-^r^rv.'— ir-co- — — — cc er r>j^--in»-oc---(»\n.-----^-iM»'<rf, C-----'-'-----«'.,*v <r ^-r- *vooooc<~occocecoco~oc--ecocccoccoooccoooocccoooce-oc— ccococcocrcccccccccococcococoococ ccccocoococcccc c <* o o c c c o <~

»& c —* coir *co»r<c ir #v r. cnj ^ *i^Ci^- c. »\» n> oi oi -• o <*. i

ceo-* — o — — — oocfv — c»* <c c — r «n *r «c cc —* .$ if«» tg-r o «t— — a- — r- a ^--o^oocccoococooc — occ

lf\rg CC C * —* f-CCO If * IV «*" CO Ou •— <*- ^ rv m f\. !•

o o c- o c ocoooocccccc o o o o o o occocooocoocccooccocoococccoocoocooocccooco

injccc r^crir <*; »* «0 4> ^ o c- —' CO" f if •- - « ic c nm in c n >j h- <r

Cm" 1 rsi^O- oc -no- — O O ino oo m ir c r if CO — *? ir *}• r- reCOCOOO^- — OCCCfMNOCNO- r^rC OCCCC O O OOC— C •- C f ' CO c r ec©co*voi*-ccc ccc oooococcccoccoccoc-coooocooccccooooccocc ococcceccoco

I c-^-0" if i*\ o m(t c if^ if- -j* r*- ^ o if in. in f- <\* ir. o CO «£ ff m n m it

I c^r- cc %r- t* *\j f*1 c r* <v ^er *0 o-m r* »o r* iv k o r«* r«- r- r* r- .r c c —

j if ~- ,— f^oc com^'-j-cc — — c \T\ *r *c <£ r- c r* <e <c — cr ^ m <r ^ — cI © c o * cc o — in — coc<\j(<ocrr-occrcc»NjCif<*v cccrv.^o'MO'--^-tcrccc-ccccoc^cc(*> — ccccI

••*•••Icoc\iotfc oecf*eccoC'm«D^*eroh r*ccoo<v--'occ— ifcr- cif^T'TOCcccoc cc-r m- no- —

^ cc r- r- o* O fsjf^cccrvj .-•«".

cr — — (fffC sCOcnifC r> *•

© o •- * c o u cc ccc •*•** 0,£00 — « ©Cr-c r*\ o- o r •- m. » ^c r:ir n- i\i--ivji— fsrs, r»rs,^-o— if. if. c r-if r-o*— *OOf> <NiOC>j'*vjO«Tr'OOCCfMfViCC o — u" a. r- cr (f

i ccoi^ — o^o irnccMMH-io cucooc-rscococj-ci

< | ifH^^ffcm(r»'if*p' C'C-* crrrp*r-Ncro--if\f—r'r^c^cceO'f^«j, <fOif'*cj'Noc-l

C ( sfirififtru*u-ifoo^*<.o^^rfc p'^^f*^-^^r^^rk ',*crcrcfcrcrccccccccrccocrcccorcc

> 3 I

CCCO—'fsir^O'if'C^ <r c O — i

^. (M f\." <m <m f\j (\. pn <*»(»• f1 f mr*\(*~

133

Page 146: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Q OL_X— I-Q =>z o_

lu zQ- —< -I

LUOO

-D (U

«J E— flj

l- c>

Co+J

Qj

v.

u</>

0)a

10

cO EJ- 3«D —O O

O

-a <uU J3m E<_) 3

c

a.>-

toLUa:o<

31t-O a<

<u

3C

Coo

J2 1_ ._+-> (D 4-1 4-» u-U> a o .— M-

• c c u- flj

•D </> <D </) •— a) UC I_ (/) F— a) <4- in 4-*

ro <U <D f— •— ^—

x

•—• -a i— >> o >-

2>•

c </> f— •— <D •— M «D F^3 J3 3 E 2 JZ ^-V o <u .— s:l_ L. JZ <u tf) 1 JZ HJ 3

• 3 JZ J3 Ol > -o •— 4-J o za) _* O v> !_ •— "»»• c E o-Q o 3 -C 3 • ^ a) n

a) JZ JZ O o o -a JD CDO -o 4-1 • (/)

— 4-1 Q. <u F— • <D —mm

4-> •— aj 3 +J (D •— s—

^

E **** E 1_i_ 2 <u i— o 3 tn 3 f0 <D F—

«n o i_' **- c 4-) o V) a) 1_ > •^4J T3 ra u »4- f0 (fl 4-1 C7) «D 4->

c (U 0) JZ •k (0 O o (D CD O C<u o> > o M <•—** F^ u 1_ a> 3> T3 0J <u •— • V) <L> o (1) Q. c<u i— a. > 2 ,—> 0) JZ •— «/) l_ a. .— U\

L. c fC en »— 4-1 M- T3 (0 3 O) (rt

F— -O. 3 Q. </) <U •— <4- •— -o C 3 -aF— <u u E 4-» flj F^ tn F^ •— c<D T3 o C 4-1 O *>—

»

3 L. o -o •— F— T> (0«4- a) c o •— (D .O 4-» (/) c 3 Cl <U

C > ro (/>*—<* <D 3 JZt E 4J -3"

.— • «0 trt 4-1 (/> >- F— o 05 3<TJ (U Q.X 4-> f— <D •— <U f— (D O. w» in D. (/)

l_ M a) Q) <D 4J «/) f— •— +-> •a E a•— •— > >— 1_ •— •— »D o o •— E O i_

l+- «/> F— <D c 3 I/) M- E "O +J 1_ F^ O o OJ

o < a. •— a: O <u o L. ou- <4- a) 0) F— N UJ v+- <u

L. O 1 i i O JZ c C7) (D ja 4-J

0) 4-1 <D to • •^ C F^ C fOJ3 V F— eg co <TJ O) f— 1- ^—

>

4-1 2 <D 2 F— <u

E a. 0) C <u >» •— O 4-1 O F—

Q.3 >- L. <u J_ > fD C c o c .— VZ t- < —1 O < T3 — .^ 1- js: 2 ££

oCO

oI

-3"

<o<SI

o o o o o •ii

1 1

CO -a- Lf\

_ ^— r- T^ KCM CA -4-

-it

a•"A

o o O o o ^»

• • • • • ji(

o o o o o.JJ

CO

13^

Page 147: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

fO E— roL- C

O >- CCZ < <— Q LU— >-

-a

3C

Coo

I-Q <x 2— oO L-zUJ <a. h-o- << o

<uIf)

en roo oo oCM r^

* CM <i>• » .e

QO

cT3 E1- 3<0 —O O

O

c

>

u\

c

>

<0

c

TO

1_

ro

(U>-

3o

(J (A

-Q

>.ro

E

0)(A

o4->

01

CCD

</>

<ua

IT\

i i

a a)v. .£>

<0 EO 3C

2>-<QO

<cc

Oec

c0)>0)

E

o

-a-CM

— o>CD •

i_ —

-Cuc

i- o <^

oi

roV*-

C

0)oc(/)

V)>»

vt>• >-

O "O

*+- o

1_

VjQE3

oegi

ini_

3o

ro ia»- cm3 •

oI

IA U\ LTVOO

oo

cm

Oo

lf\

135

Page 148: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

APPENDIX E

MODEL VARIABLES AND DESCRIPTION

VARIABLE LIST AND DESCRIPTIONVariable

name Description

ACRES Area of siite in acres.

ADT Average daily traffic.

BBOD Value for BOD5 (mg/1)

BOD Value for BOD5 (pounds)

BCD Value for Cadmium (mg/1)

BCL Value for Chlorides (mg/1)

BCOD Value for COD (mg/1)

BCR Value for Chromium (mg/1)

BCU Value for Copper (mg/1)

BFE Value for Iron (mg/1)

BPB Value for Lead (mg/1)

BSS Value for Suspended Solids (mg/1)

BTKN Value for total KJELDAHL Nitrogen (mg/1)

BTN Value for total N02 + NO3 (mg/1)

BTOC Value for Total Organic Carbon (mg/1)

BTPO Value for Total Phosphorus (mg/1)

BTVS Value for Total Volatile Solids (mg/1)

BVSS Value for Volatile Suspended Solids (mg/1)

BZN Value for Zinc (mg/1)

CD Value for Cadmium (pounds)

CL Value for Chlorides (pounds)

COD Value for COD (pounds)

CR Value for Chromium (pounds)

CU Value for Copper

DDAYS Dry Days

FE Value for Iron (pounds)

ITYPE

I MOI DAY

I YEAR

Type of site (Value of 1, 2 or 3)

Month of rainfall eventDay of rainfall eventYear of rainfall event

continued

136

Page 149: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Variablename

APPENDIX E

MODEL VARIABLES AND DESCRIPTION (continued)

VARIABLE LIST AND DESCRIPTION

Description

Kl IN

Kl

K2

User supplied K^ (pounds of total solids/mile-day)Accumulation rate, (pounds of total solids/mile-day)Washoff constant depending upon I TYPE

LENGTHNUM

Length of site in milesNumber of rainfall events to be analyzed

PB

PENIT

PINITPOLBUP

PWSHOF

Value for Lead (pounds)

Initial total solids load or remainder fromprevious washoff

Initial total solids load

Total solids buildup from the equation P=PQ +

(Kj x HLxT)

Total solids washoff

R

RAINRDURATREMA

ROFFCFROFFIN

Average runoff rateRainfall in inches

Rainfall duration in hours

Total solids remaining (total solids buildup -

total solids washoff)Runoff in cubic feetRunoff in inches

SS Suspended solids (pounds)

TITLETKNTNTOCTOTRANTPOTPWSHF

TRUNCFTRUNINTVS

Title of simulation (user input)

Total KJELDAHL Nitrogen (pounds)

Total Nitrogen (pounds)

Total Organic Carbon (pounds)

Total rainfall (inches) for the entire record

Total Phosphorus (pounds)

Total solids washed off (pounds) for the entire

recordTotal runoff (cubic feet) for the entire record

Total runoff (inches) for the entire record

Total Volatile Solids (pounds)

continued

137

Page 150: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

APPENDIX E

MODEL VARIABLES AND DESCRIPTION (continued)

VARIABLE LIST AND DESCRIPTIONVariable

name Description

VSS Volatile Suspended Solids (pounds)

XDD Dry day value used to calculate total runoff

XYD Dry day value used to calculate pollutant build-up

Y1 Runoff Duration (hours)

ZN Value for Zinc (pounds)

138

Page 151: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

APPENDIX F

RECEIVING WATER IMPACT SAMPLING

PURPOSE

The sampling effort carried out at the Harrisburg 1-81 site receivingstream (Pine River) was intended to provide a preliminary overview ofthe existing instream conditions before and after a runoff event. Theresults of this sampling effort provide direction for the receivingmodel and data needs for future sampling efforts.

Sampling of the receiving stream on July 1, 1976 included a prestormand poststorm effort at the same locations to quantify changes in

biological, chemical or physical stream characteristics. Locationsof the sampling points are approximately 50 ft (15.2 m) upstream ofwhere the highway runoff channel entered the stream and 150 ft (45.7rn) downstream. Runoff from the highway discharges to the streamthrough an unlined channel and appeared to be completely mixed by thetime it reached the downstream sampling site.

Prestorm (dry weather) samples were taken approximately two hoursbefore the start of the July 7th rainfall which produced 0.49 inches(1.24 cm) of rain in 30 minutes. Four days of dry weather preceededthis storm, insuring no highway runoff loads were contributed to thestream during the prestorm monitoring. The flow within the streamduring this sampling interval was 0.2 cfs (0.006 m3/sec) as comparedto a high of 9-0 cfs (0.25 m3/sec) during the wet weather sampling.

RESULTS

Samples of the stream and bottom materials were acquired on a grabsample basis during the prestorm period in order to determine theeffects of the single discharge point of highway runoff. Sedimentsamples were taken at upstream and downstream locations to determineif highway runoff altered the chemical or physical properties ofbottom sediments at the downstream location as compared to upstream.Table F1 presents the bulk analyses for these sediment samples. Dryweather samples show little difference between upstream and downstreamlocations. Wet weather samples show more significant variation betweenlocations for certain parameters. Comparison of the analyses for the

upstream site between dry and wet weather shows significant changefor oils, total phosphorous and COD. Iron concentrations were high

at all locations, however, iron is a regular component of surfacewater in that area.

The general conclusion regarding sediment analysis is: no significantimpact at this sampling site can be determined. Long term build-upof metals or oils and grease on the downstream portions have not

been seen nor can any impact be related to the small volume of highway

runoff present.

139

Page 152: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

in>«

fD

cfo

3-O

C0)

^E

D<U

in

i_

<U4-»

fO

3CnC

o<uJ_

enL.

3-QW1_!_

fO

EfD

<L)

u4->

V)l_ C0) 2-C O4-i QfO

<u

2M<u

3 EfD

(1)

l_

4-1

(/)

Q.=>

E03

a)i_

4->

Wl_ C<D 2-C O4-1 ofO

(1)

2>»i_

a EfD

<L>

1_4-*

Wa=)

fOua>+J(1)

EfDl_

fD

a.

<5^> eve-3- vOvO r-»»

OCA

CALA

-3-

r»«»

CM

ooCM

CM

ooLA

CA•3-

vOvO

-3"

la-3"

vOCA

ola

-3-

vOOoLA

OOCM

caco CO CMLA VO OO

LA

LA CM vD —

r^. -3"

-a- cm

«— CA

oLALA

-3"

CAOOCO

CM

OOLA

CA

ca CM-3"

CAfA

CMLACA

<*9 <3*>

-3* COCO O

OCALA

COCA

OO

fA fA

OO-3-

CACA

COCA

vOCA

COCM

-a-CACO

</)

-o

_O inCO 3

o<u 1_~- o

</> •— JZ-o 4J a.•— <D 01*— p*- o <u

o O .c E l/l

CO > o. 3J_

0)

cr— ^ ^ 'e 0) fO

fD fD V) <D c o o Q. en -o4-1 4-1 ^« 4-1 O o c 1_ a. c fD

o o •— o L> •— -C O fD <DK t- o 1- o — M o o s: _J

int_

a)4-1

<D

EfOufO

Q.

cnc

fD

Ea)

a>

sz2.

4->

Ca)oi_

<DaV)fO

T><u4->

J_

oa.<u •

i_ inaU •_i_ i—fO o

in

in1_ >»a) s_

4-> TJ0)

E cv-

fO OI_

fO cnQ. J*

"V.Ul cnTJ E,_ <D

o u.

CO fD

]k0

Page 153: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

At the same time the sediment samples were obtained, instream sampleswere taken to determine if immediate impacts could be quantified. Dry

weather grab samples were taken to provide background concentrations.During the runoff period of the July 7th storm, grab samples were againtaken at the same locations. Similar samples were also taken afterthe surface runoff and high in-stream flows had subsided. These sampleswere used to determine possible decrease of in-stream concentrationsafter the runoff had subsided. Table F-2 shows the analysis resultsfor these grab samples. Again, little variation is encountered betweensites or samples except for the noticeable increase in BOD after the

storm. The relatively low concentrations of BOD and the increase in

concentrations upstream of the discharge, however, negate furtherinvestigation as to the source or impact of this load.

Table F-3 presents the results of the in-stream samples taken during

the dry and wet weather monitoring periods. Also included are compo-site sample results from the highway runoff on July 7th. On a simpleconcentration basis, the relative quality between upstream and down-

stream locations is consistent. Mass balance analysis of wet weatherdata, however, is required in order to determine the relative magni-

tude of the loads in the system.

Mass balance analysis using the wet weather data was calculated withstage measurements at a downstream gage and the highway runoff values.

Although detailed (multiple sample) composites of the stream flow were

not taken, the following mass loadings using the rough composites will

provide some insight into the relative contribution of the highway

runoff.

1. Highway runoff flow data 7/7/76- duration of overflow 150 minutes- average flow 1.13 cfs (0.032 m3/sec)- total flow to river 10,145 ft3 (287-3 m3)

2. Downstream receiving streamflow

- duration of sampling 150 minutes- average stage reading 2.165 feet (0.660 m)

- average flow 7.25 cfs (0.205 m3/sec)- total flow 65,235 ft3 (1,847.5 m3)

3. Upstream receiving streamflow

- assume downstream flow - highway = upstream- 65,235 - 10,145 = 55,090 ft3 (1,560.1 m2)

Using Table F-3, the kilogram loadings of Table F-4 are, derived by

multiplying total flow times composite quality (wet weather values).

Columns 1, 2 and 3 of Table F-4 present the measured kilograms of each

parameter from the instream and highway runoff composites. Column 4 is

141

Page 154: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

ElL.I

4-> CO LA fD fDin CM • C c+-> r>. P^01

OQ_

EOJ0)«- EMS- p^ CO fD fD1/) O CM • C cC 4-> |->. vO2 coO

E!_

CO r— -3- O O• M . CM #

in r-^ r->. d -3"

4-J i_

fD a.2CHc•— |e> [ i_•—

4-> vOen CM

^o fD

0)L. (n

Or^. <r

01 a.1_

3-Q EW fD•— <D E1_

1_L. 1_ vO4J O

OCM

CA fO

cfD

fD in +j rs» r>^3: a. to

ID

CM1

Li.E

-a<u

ECDO -3"4-1 . CM

vD CM vO

3 a)r^. d fr\ O

fD !_i+-

h- Q.

in

s_

<L>

Q.

in

+-I r— O 1 __ , ,

in

— s O 1 \ \c en=3 E

enE

enl=L

ro|

fD

CfD

OC

i_a)

II

CD+ja)

34-1

fD Q_

fD

CE 1_ OfD <u 1_ #-

fD ELA O

4_la. <D X .C O21— Q. CO O

142

Page 155: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

in

0)

Q.EfD

W

EfD

o1_

Mt/)

c

eni_

3

in

i_i_

fD

i

fD

EfD

<UU4->

Wc2OQ

1_

a>jr+j >>fD fO

<u 25 .c

C71+J •—(U n:5

EfD

<Dl_

MV)

a=>

EfD

(1)

!_

M1_ in

<d c.c 2»-> OfD Q<U

2>»i_ EQ fD

<u1_

+Jin

aZD

^»CDE«s

u<uM<D

Efo1_

fD

Q-

cmo(M

CMCOCS

COco co o r->. r-^ CM CO r- ,_ T— -3- -3" laCM -3- CM o o o *~" o co CO 3" «~

o O o o o o oV

*- o *~

vD co r^CO la COr— co

CM O-3" i-

OOO Od

-3-

\0

CO «—O i-coO p^ la r^

LA P-* «—\0

O r-

la CO ooCO CM

COCO

vD ,_ vD CM CO co r^. ,_ -3" oo vO LOCM • O O • o o o CO LA O ,—

• o • • -3" • o • • •

O V o o o o dV

*""" o

oo «-CM CO

-3"

LO VO -3" t— -3- CM r~. r— CO , vO , -3-

O 1 O O • o o o co o vO• o • • «> • • o • • •

o V o o o oV

*"" o o

CM LA M3O-3- «-

-3" t-O• Oo v

IAO CMO

-3" .-O O CO »-

o o. oo o

V

COCO

«- CO vOo \o

oV

-a<D in

in oc

3o

_ 0)

a.L.

oO in •— in j:co a

05

3CO

a.in

"U ^— i— O<U o o tn <u in .c E fD

-a CO > "O 1— D D_ -—v E 3 >«c •— •— •— -3" l_ 3 •— l_

a) i— r— t— M ^ — O 0) •— E 3a fD fD o fD O fD Q- -a u Q. c E O Oin +J •M CO r— CO M y— fD c Q. O TJ i_ l_

3 O o o O 0) .— o i_ fD jC <u

CO f- H- > 1- _l M o — O o 2:

CT)

i_

fD

mCMoz z

I I

CO CO o3C O O

143

Page 156: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

C <U CO p*» CA -d"—s O Ol<o o c ca ^ -a- r^ 1—

i

—' I- <D en I™

\D LA CA<D -C 1 1 1 1

a. u

0)

o• c *

V) <D^N r-* OO CA -3- vOa> ^n 1. M ^~ -a- • LA • •

c LA Q) 1 JO <r ^ vO • 00 O•— —'u- -a- — 1 CA O ^—-o 14_ t 1 1

<o •—o Q~~

i-

<DjC•M *^^(D cm<U ^•^ ^-^

2 *- >>JQ*— (D —

4J E 2<u ^ flj -C « CO r-* CA vO en r^»2 -J" <U CTITD 1— CO • T— • •

«—' J- — (0 -a- CO vO • CO ^—

L. +j J= o a la r— v— vO<D (/) — ^—+-> Q. tf)

ro => 32

Q.Olc

>•— E0) (Do 0)<D !_ •> m r-. LA PA 1—l_ n+J'o CM en • r^ • •

CA w <0 -Q 00 T— CO • r^ r—•o -"CO — •V en >— CA vOc 2 — ?—<U O>»<0

2en >-•— (0 •> T— r^ v£> LA vO t—X r-s 2 -d • CM 00 \D O • O)nx (o ja \D CM • CM • O .*^010- 00 00 • -3" t—

-a- JCO II

Li- LA-3-

CU

E O2> <D •> p^ CA OO vO«J <u -a CM »— • en • • X\- <-n L- (0 -Q CA !— OO 00 -3- <—

r- +J O — A -3- • T— LA JO*»— cn — *— ai

a.rs

Mi_ Ca) 3Ma) -a- OE CO <-> •—<U CO CO CO 0. <a l_1_ to 1- > H LL. 1- M(D a)D_ E

144

Page 157: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

the sum of columns 1 and 2 which should be approximately equal to the

downstream load of column 3 if the system is relatively free of otherwithdrawals or loads. Column 5 is the difference between columns k

and 5 while column 6 is the percent change.

The results presented in Table F-k indicate an extremely wide variationin loads. Suspended and volatile solids loads indicate either a largeamount of scour within the stream or lateral inflows while t°tal solids

indicates settling or outflows between sampling points. Only TOCshows a fairly reasonable consistency. The monitoring sites werechecked to insure no other in-flows or branches in the stream occurred.The only conclusion to be drawn from the data is that the upstreamloads are all less than the downstream loads. However, the highwayrunoff contribution alone is not of sufficient magnitude to evenapproach a reasonable "mass balance". Other types of monitoringincluding benthos description were attempted but the results were alsoinconclusive.

145

Page 158: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

(voooirt

COh-

<-3 —I=>X CO— llI

O CCzUJ —IO. UJQ. Q< o

UJ OCC z33OK

UJ oa •-0.1-I VI

i a

zz«t «a i->- 3

UJ VIt- t~ z< —acc O 1-1D JHa. uj —><>o •UHU• VI UJOUliu: J3

KVZ CM— JJa m

KUII30 mO — -T<J CC -Ooa •

a -s-

VI]C ^r »•UJ VI •

— I UlxlLJHI- 1 t><V) I -KIZ-— I II-OXCC • UJ 2 —UJ I O O >- t- o>- I <- J3UIO I Z X •-._) —< I •- < -J _<cc i < u. a o a< i cc o a ax i o UJ 3*J I XO JU!_!•-<<UJ t «I O CC — CC»- • H- Z UJ h- UJ— i au > z v>VI I I- J < •- 3

zoUJ ZX —-ZCC —a xa. ccUl UJOl-

o. u o-• x

>- r a

146

Page 159: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

I i/l u.> 1 u.. 3 O

-J • OkIrt l/l

¥- U.•a O

O a:Z Ul3 l-O u.a «

> uuj Oa: I-

_i i

3 I

</> I

ui I

OTJ I

I

>- I*- •

mmI- •

Z I

ooooooo o

O —I-2(DUJ

oc uu.

OKIZ ~^3 1/1 l/>

OEZU• uu I

UJ t- U> z z

U. I— l/l

O < cr

z a 23 =1 OKOI

o zZ o3 Z

nut»a i/>

Sou. u.

< z

>* >cc <O O

r*-o*-N(niMOOHO'Nff'(n^inco#^io

_ ~ _ r,j -. ~. _ m

o^iTH^iM^ioo^mmir^N irt ^ <o ii> r* <v «««moniN(\j»«m»jrtNo«< tf rt <\* tr coOmnOxMOOOMOOOON^xO^

ff" ^ <o c

ooooooooooooooooooo

oooooooooooooooooooCO <Ni cr O O f*- tf> CU oj -• OO CD <M CD O <J *M -^ ry

—• -*o *\i -r *• m — o m ./! o^* * « # m o»f> o

MflNfljifiirioO-'AJ 0(TMN>>0>t|>NC

ooooooooo — oooooo o o —

-*#\j«\imm«M©o«M*©*'«»r»-*m«»« o * n"»

ooooooooo — oooo*-^ooo»-«

•£»00'0-00'0*>-0'0^)0'000-0-0>0-0

o *r* co o r»a3<rr-co0tnir«(^>*rico-"0'0x tr>

trvi^ir^tTi-o-o-o-or-r- cud a>o<oa 9>00

uuu2 1 —— U CD» Z 3

a a atUl Ul o

Z O. 0. UJo o

3 « « •/»

X -I _l —— 3 3 Oi/> r zM M V)

z —-15'JJ-or z z o3 — — i/>

o oc or3 3-J

< u. u. OU. Uk u_ >-zoo— Z Z u.1 3 30at oi oc

III

_> -I -JO5 * *5r- i- - 3o oooi- i- i- a

147

Page 160: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-J • Nomr^OirNNiSCO^nin u~> a- £> « it* od

01 •••••••*••••••••• O I

r i

© *3 CO P- P"» P- OO'^'NiOM^OO^COOir<r o^f^-HiTtfsi*' — m^o* •« m •-« co s <r c»p» in fi*i cr *rr>irvr«"*-«rsjio-Hrf\ino*<s«j^(J»**1*1 * o i^ o f** •Gt*~+ir\t*\o*r*t&^i*4ir\f<)r-

iMOHifi-oaOMOOi^ OI^OhOhQ

• »* ^* r*» * o rg -e• «0 m CV <M CD 4T if*

_j i -O m rg r~. o O Oxi •*-+& if* m (*•

o j ••••••X I 000000-4

ooooooooooooooooooo V •

CD I

-J •

*Tcoov moov r,"iir>©r*-o-i",i « «i i^g u- « cc co_ -- eg —. <nj ry ,-«,-( m m <-• -^ t\i rsjc^.-trsi — moooooooooooo ooooooo

i co * o* «* tr> m *I I rg in •-• (vj o <X N

I o o ~< o « — o1/11 ••••••CD I OOOOOOO

_j • *r«^o^mcD*p*-%Of\*csimr,'-p'-ce»-'eC'0*"*tf»\ i mr-mrnir\p»»ga.orsi©rsi«rotnp**ir»*©o,»

o« • •••••••• •••••x • r\jcoirt^^-(f\cocr>co<0(Nj(rtOcgcoo«-cDf^i

• cotrt*, o«-orsjoos P-<r0> o»*cr> m p4 « A

^fvrsjrwm^rvjiMfMrocoArtOCDOirt cocoC>JO^* (D<0NOOC*HO4)m9> *«mcr-eo^rgmo^irtwootrtNOtrtcoo^o m

*0D^'C'\ff1 ff1 NfrtNO>O >T C" iT* f- c- CD #0"» cor^u^^O^f^rammP^M trt m m cm o co <-•

ocoiMf-tonm^-o^noo co it* «- eg co o* r\to—«*— <Nirsjmco(MCD(Njgomo<N(«coii^ 0*- p»

r*r-o^<rococo<ru^ofsjcr CO C <0«0 O rsi.TmOtrOh^MNO^J -o J- r-* a W> — CD_< —• —, «- wif-w •cm m »*

~«p-0k »\jg5~*pncnoto**©r'» mAiNaNQ^CCMsJ-CCOJ-(\CDN'C -O ^0 If O IT lO 1

coOwo^J<rP*ox fMc*>»rfn^<*(T>-^'^f*\m^

I CM O 0*00 <

I CO CO © *- iO <

_l • in o- o -o O I

x i •« tr* *• «n i

r i <- o (m o in ,

< i

uj i o m tr« tr tr*

j I r* •*• P* eg COv i orw<oomi/i i • • • • •

CD • O O OO O

ir« mO -rp-O

m^ONMsmNNom <rcocDtf*grr»r»cD0«NO« ^N^MftHN -r r» <\j <D —• O O -»

-*0-**rcg~*rniT\pgCr'P» *3 co g3 eg #• cr OP-*^tf*l?>(\jai<D'MCLOC* «a COtTtlTtCO IT* Ogo eg ift 0* ** —• omcoo-xr-ocr^oj- -OO*tr>*Ma>»co«r*'mr*tf>,r«-^*-m*ow3m«©*

-m m ^ cm ** eg

iTi^rfiOCD >rf >0'O fc*©>TO CD >-• O N rsj i\ -4

fO'Oin»HOf*'iO'rifta OiA^ff, NO'fi'*' p*«^HCC-'N-«IiUi^J'v' go co ct* gr m a"* o^

P* P- o o *• o o*gr m m o m m o

CD •

\ p» s o* •- m m rg o* mi^ •CNcoNff1 co0"Oifttf\P*»P*-O^^C^^COgr^\f^r^f*fno,,,mfgocDcr o ini^trtN cDr-»fn*\iP>ip'*(r»(«rt

a- * cp * ^* m p- p» <oo«*cr>oocom o^omit- —» -« a O <*g cDJ-r-mOX>u~i'N(iri<M^-Oy~ipfc tf\C7s ryjO<>«J<»'—»pnioox tfvp»'P*><rcoP~ pa q-

_ rn r- —4 p^ co .f* eg co ^* »* «-• 4r«'9s m<<p m <-«

i cr o -o m o c o• toOinocOMO

t m*4>rM^p*m

I OP**-«*i «**gro-^*, PMw3Psioeo^P*if»**ji coo«^oirtom«'«'^-omrMMON4ririOO*n»» coomco«r*coP*mr-O^Pto tr*ift^o^)0,''0oi p4m<MrtcoN^N(raDin^NOcooa)«Nr •••• •••••••••

• mp»OfNjif»o,*o*pnp-irp-coiMO^)ift#

-* oi tr\ p- o irt4rmf*>iCM£>coirtfM*rMOki

p^moo«Opncop>itO*-imirtrg(r\Ofnm<*o<r<ri-ycO'-"fi<MCDO© m eg m o* eg i

v. i ©o****ot cDtr*o-», r,»r*fPtPgpg**minO • mmir*r*-*'OwD«, cDO#pnco-ePtf\00

^ »h AI ooooooo

oDO»P"^oai ffc #ir\**oo* cdocmcoa>irtmoo^PK-oirtcook CO OO0*p«*o

o i

a •— o *- 1 r- o in » o> O rg« o V • ^^IMOOI**"*KN O 1 o o -» o — — o

(E I <-N. m

i

ooooooo

CC • <0<0<0<0<0<0>0

o i m ti> irt m ^) -o <£l^> ^ f*r i ^|7

S OQ (DCO^^ ^O O I «MIMK«<<«

« • a iHull . I- uj I

UJXI ««»^^»^r^,^^^^« UJXI> = I > 3 I

UJ Z I uj Z I

«cgm*-ifi*r*uj0^o^f>J' i -J- <r* -o r^ © si— uj i

z m •

uj x •

> 3 •

148

Page 161: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

m tooor- con o o<>* I ooooooooooooooooooo

X. I NOONhOhOOOOO Al I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

* I <ar^)i**Oifv«N<NJi\i

/ • o — ~ oooo —v> « ••••••••CD I OOOOOOOO

CT <Nj —• <E O e —* *Ti -O JNOMNlTi^OCDaOO^COtO^}mr-ifi^ < » O O <-• •"••-tOOofMOOOOngOOO'NiO o O o <J I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO• ••• V V*l * •••••••*•••••••«•••oooo aii ooooooooooooooooooo

• r\im*tr*»ni\*m©«-ttf^Gomi o* *r-o»ri(^tr» — omooo

—i j u^#n'wu*4or-os '«"0'»*-«f-x. *>o*Ch~<^*-f**^>^r-o*o

MD ftciOC' o«^r^^©^•'OC0C^ m.»oftf*-o** <*%{*» co n s o^r^r^r— ^-o^f^f*- c^ipo oOOoO«-»0<,>**rNO*oOmoOO«-<-«OOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO

f i ^Hr-ooo<^mcD>Nim(NjOIfl I •••••••••••tf) • OOoOOOOOOOOo-I I

' I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO(St I • ••••••••••••••*•cd i ooooooooooooooooooo

tn^cjfy'Or^t^tf'xOtnO^-r\ior^co«-»a>o*M'Or*-m's»fl-co*'Ocooi '*fiitir»o4 ffi

l 1rr"(ft 1oO(fl"<NO'J, *oOiONfl3ff, N(D—it •orgr^or-ir»'N*«r*u^*0'»-,3"-^if\irvf^omN. oooooorsiro^-»om-^o^ooooo

/\0 I • •••••••••••••••••XX

i

ooooooooooooooooooo

i (nooNm^cD*tPa)<fN

I *••••••••••*rmMMnm* * f- *• « .a- cr>

oc • *o*^trna,, <M(^tf\<vi^^'*- fn<Nj*N)-oo'sJCO(nI I OOi\JOHftjOO(MnoO««<MHHOmt_> • ooooooooooooooooooovw • •••••••••••••

CD I ooooooooooooooooooo

& -* a* at >r \r iroocomcoNOONi-NN O^O 00s

— o o —> o o ~ oooooO f

r

^)»-»ir>NO(*ff, (*«lf>(\lO'^^'0'», '^(^^ CDCT*M MflOM'fNONMD «© o O o <\) -O "S"

mO"^ m a> o* ry <n o* •» -o

O^oOOOOoOOOo000000000000

H*rtOiM*H*^HOOtMNJCD>OHO(ft4'0«N<\^'Nj'(0'NJaDOv NN-OCO'MlArj

0<->rMONrgOOrgmOO—4<-*(M*^o<-*rn

o i or-r^-cocDcococco^a^cro

i

«ai OioajO'^tD*N©Oif<irOl ^^rvjClH^HiMryrgi^

Ol tf\U">iT\tf-»-OO'£«Gr*f*"C0C0a)C0CC<7v x Q> O

£ ao • «0<rOH(MH)jin£ n^co o-

> 3 •

Zoo i •-•c»jft^j-if\,op-ajo'', o«-"«'\i'r*'j- *r»'*}f— coo**

349

Page 162: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

« • U« a.

3O<1-Z

IL a oIL o u

UJ ODC Z i- UJ3 3 z VIo ce UJ «UJ Z UJo > 0. _JO 4 O a.a. x _la x UJ -i

is > UJUJ m UJ o> x o a

z- z uU "" irt

Z mO (/> u zUJ u a <v -a — < ma. >~ UJ u^ ui «i no o zi •* UJ «

a. IT o z zZ UJ a. zO f UJ trt 3m o *- Z ae1- < < O ic>

« HE «cu Z <M1- « O -J l/» — •*>

a z a UJ ae mo w a to 3 QC UJ 1

a a 3omi/i i- <_> *- UJ <jmZ Z v> UJ •j « o« « O UJ X O CO I

a t- K X 3 o »i- 3 a < mx«

-1 Z m I Z »IL -1 KO -J IDI/t 1

o o UJ _>< -«a. am CO _Jh aau

z o ce ZZUJ Z a <j oZ x > m X»- z co >- z a« M z< z o «a a UJUJ UJ a ILo t- o »*

— wqco jo« »u uj t-

l/V I w MM > ww • 4£ILUJ<M | UJ — U. ,J U.>- i a >- <</> • <<li2-m | 2 I- Oxat • uj I —UJ I O O > I" oV- I 4XJ3UJU I Z Z M _|M< I — < _l _la i < u. o o a< • oc o a. a.x • o UJ 3o i x is -J«/>

i _i »- < «uj • < o oc mqct- • K2UJH U— t O UJ > Z l/>

<* I I- _J « m 3

150

Page 163: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

UJ I

a. t

l

>- l

t~ l

— I

*- i

o ooooo•o o

v> in

X X

•a <u. u-

a. so

i- ror ex

V) < oO I- I-Ztnw3o t- u.a -i o

g or «- XZu>QC3 1-bjO

o. < a. u->

U- uo •- -2 CD UJDD«JOIUIL

U. >- OO >- XZ «• V3 Vt ulKZlU

ZI33 3oHOI

O Xz o3 Zat •-

»- vtZ < or

•« 30sax

U- tuZ X— o« zat -*

o«9>(n<or<NMOM^ot<o«rMi<i^o##(M«ir4Nook mMn«(k OOMeomiro*-r'00(^o*'Njrsi*-t-«o'<or*mmmff'*MO'0<*tr^o*ox iM«flO

««^oo«n9040«i'iO'9f^NiAno^nn«o^400toOMOOnil(lHHftj»09, nNOOiMOHOOOAOOO'4000HOO'4Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

OOJ-OO^OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO(VOAOIb N«ff'Ot IAN<OMIOUV^HO(VOIfIIM,>^N(M^OniNhOl ff>

4l>ti^HO#ni>t0lM<CH»4H-4HH«^M(riNn'4AO0«N4OON

»0(^«MOD«r-oaO'H<oaDOOO<or^«-«9k ^tf>^Oft-oo^aooirno^«ruO-*ir\©tr<r»fnow>omoom**-«rupyo'M«***ooo*©*,gru©p*^.

OO-^OOOOOO^'MOOOOOOOOO — OOO-"OOO0OOOO

«N#OOnniNOH^MOOOOO^^HNNlvOOO(D#Ntf\OON

00 — 000000<*g<VOOOOO©000 — ooo-<oooooooo

ifiNH«NonmnHOMn«HHHomiN«n«o«ha#nM^ON

lf> * o to

"""15

— UJ</> UJUJ ~ U.xviUIUUZ X —-us— Z 3M Oo —

a a ofuujOz a a. ujo o- 2 z or- a a «

- 3 30Mil•- M 4«

o v> i/) oZ ••— O O _lor z z o3- — «1B or or3 3 _iJO o «

J -« u. u. ou. u. u. >-

zoo— z z u.

< 3 30or or a:

JJJO« « « zt- »- - 3oo oo

*0 -£»•£> -O £> -o coaDGOaDODcoaoo3or)aoaoaooN o> o> os o>> ox Q>ox

153

Page 164: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

£

#oooo<i-i(DNOO'firo, ominAoinO(DiDtf\ctmcO'HQN^HH^r»u^00OCDr~O<%ic0OrnOiri0s -J-ii~>s0-3"-J- fr*^~^T0, OCDr-f^rsjr\(CD0s kfv

^i^h (Moo«o-«ap-o «-«o m to <\i r*- ry r- c MTfNji^jrt^t^iai^^r*I OOOm*-i<MOOo*f,*r-0-*0©'

£ • ^^a)OOif>oo^*noo^o-ff»-^

CD •

-J I

ooooooooooooooocooooooooooooooooo CO • ooooooooooooooo

mioNtf^NCif^^ON^NjPO * *« <«*. co oj <v om«r. ^^NNtDtriocMtcm in s •£> j- ^- co *tH(\*tf NrnoOtM *o, ^-r«notfM*> «OHir\Mtmivi•>* C* «* *o •-•* «i o^t Noirx.-^ <o — eg © m -« co. ru •-• m •»

i mos o*cri <M*o,,o<-or*'©«Nim.

_j i r*-cir\Ajocco*r»ryfsj^cr.

f t r»eccooo*oo-^*o*>i^ccmf^coor*-if>'#-^^«-«r*-CT*oc»jr-o^«iMfnr*i^-• #o*^<ltf*^^ corvirtcomr-mc*t'0<©cor»tf\«-«eo*<ocoOfV'#r*-ot ^m

•* mr*-«NJir»*v*vxoco*omrs(«» co m o* co eo*vo>i *'ir\p,-irir-m <»i *-»<Nj CC CO ^ iT-l^'S) o o "^

in I

** i

trt •v- •

-J •

< •

Z •

— •

-J

3 •

O •

-J I

V •

O I

coc^<rrsifrt^(Njo^o^rvi-^^cOFte OA Nrgi^-4<-«tn^^r>cOc04>(Vf\irsio^'-i

^^•^ cro cof" <Tt o* t- o tr» h * o* win <^* rwt***^>*'corwfnc7,'0^ m co iC •-«

^r*in©NTOO^*ox ^os Oo^r\iov rnfNjcrxT*fnm(?>^«43Cocowf>ig5*<>c?%

oj ec *•-«© <m r*- oo^mruo^mor^o^mm *os 'C«MOO«^mr,to ^^o o © *

I r* r* m \f\ cvi o <m co (A m

-j i u-\ o- *r> co r»s. • co p- to m tf\

o i • • • • •

£ • o o «r\ <j> ©• ^ r* <M o

«<i -« ^- r- crO O O -3" if\

~ © s tn r»

r- inCD ajCr« <Mm m

o oC* o

On qs

o co I

HO'f mac o

«NJ ITOn *3CD -O fSI (Ni

•* 00m ITm cc t

(HMinmNnNNOOm^Hin

tf"NAJO*^0N c\|CT'f"» K <*aC0NT<Mr**f*0> f*"ONC0tf\f^r*>IMt*-<-<0N^^-*'«MN««C- J ffi J'- -<NMftC0N(NJrtO>N*N^(h* <>iO^ O1 O * OCDl/\0N-»<-i©OaD (Mr^lOf^O^OOtCaH^H^lMir^OONOOlPtfC^OOmiDCOOO O0x <SI«l*»OO«VOf^rgr*r*-0s 43 CO <\J *3 tT» fA OJ

OOOOco«<C Ni-tHO^^ff-OiftCO-tir* ^ON0,>u^ ** * © if* ,»• —• CO rvJ r^-

f^^-j'O'f^^r*- mpjco inc>H ^-o*oo«xcocoM<l>cO'Of\if-r'-

Kioo4>eo ^mm^ ^o^<o<MiocorNj<ommoN«*-«ocor,>-<-i^4)«vrNr•^mf\j*m«ftOif» «0^fl0rgorgOff>Ofk-mrN'iO0N*0#C0*»-OOC0'*

OOoo-*rg*f>j(-«*OiAr*>0^'O«'< ,^M'S'infriOOjO(71 j'cnOH

i <octfiotooH(ncoOin <

j i rN-mofsioo—tO^cocooN-

Ol s ccfNjiT»«NJ<M-a-'0^"srir*'

« tn CO

i ojao^'^co^'ioa)^ <rNO*Hirt(h• ^>tr\m*off*^©©mmr*r-r-p,j

4/11 •••••••••••••

Ol OO'UO^DO-Of^r-XI "***

05COCDC0COCGCOCOiDcDcOcCO,'O'Cro,'C>Ov thOv a i o<oooo«<oi

zco i <^f>iin#^*^coo^O-^',J<^xr»o-or-»X)0,,'Or^rgfn*tOJ)fN-iDo^O'-«<^tf\

ujZ I

Z co • -*csif\>»'»n^r*coov O«-"« rsi',>NTtn

J 52

Page 165: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

x i o<r'NJcgir><r«©m»*'ir»Qx G''r»<\io»f*-u^o i •••••••••••••••••X I NN»4MinOHN9>0#ONHMOmO

_j • (OO'COO^NinffnmM^^^rMMocDism^cMnr-iOtsco^OinO^r11

n. t «^om^^^r\jco**o<r»iA*3»f*#tf"*-*<-«co«-«f*j^u"*»-'',%fgt^O'>Jtr»**»*01 • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••£ • O ~ © O -< OOOOOOO-* —»000000000-HO-»OOOOfNj-^0

1 a3r»«^r-in«irtirtwtna><M<i<%^oo^O<>mtf%a)rNj*co9>irttri"4irtr»>^1 t h»« ^co m« iAmmi/>Hip^fgNmm«fg«©fgrgNa>tfMnNNmmip «< 1 000000000*^00000000000000000000000

i/» •CD I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

• r-comeCf'tPfncD-emr-^i-*-*^^

v 1 org«-'irr*0'0-^totrO<NiC'Orsjo01 ••••••••••••••••

1 mu"\<©.ca*fricr, *«,vj*-cor»r*-«r-m

•H CD-I •

V I

O I

X •

O* (T-hMj-rvjjJr^ffi *ON^f»a«-OiN^«lfiCiT-t © <r eg fi") f^ CD *

oom^)*-ip*r»r"r-r-o*'Or-r-»^'r^*"(r>r*-^^^cj<D^-m^-or»f0i-«a>000^Hr-OO0<N»O0«fS(r>g(M—.^hoOOOO — "NiO-O — — ^OCDtrO

l©Org0x 0*-*4rmf-OOmoC,'-*«-«<0-* J •

|Oj#r»C0l*-—•Or»*cgO«NJ<M**tr**>CDgj> V I

lOI9>^C4'ONa}lSM>JO<OOOt>OinN CD •

O CO -J" -D CO IT* — ~- —

1

^f\jr«-i«CDCC^—'—<m<rOf^<T'Of,,-U^CDCOr-%00OOH#(Mrtrg«*H^O(\lOO*00000*000*NNOmOHM(T)OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

1 Noocr-iri^unrt'i^^MN-Off-irrgt-j 1 ^m«oo«*oNa, o, (Off'»iflif»fl>x • f^r*><^mi\nrmg»ir»o*M»a>r»»-»cgrg,01 ••

1 i\ffi"« -H^ •if>jov ^<r^mmt-»tf\r*t

^or\(O^0'0^«r'- ^-fMjcDui^^o-ot*! ,tO©*rtO^Nccico'y/i<r*4'0'ri,,'(09NKMM0DMSrk>mom9>r^(0^#^0^(honi^^N(MrH^^OOs aj>-i«^) C-^rv^i r.cDj-(nod> >o*^n'i'-'C, iD<r(\ri-^fNirn«o

rsj cr —. ,-. _< —» og 00 rsjoon%<rtf\f>jr^fM mtou-^o'M'O'j-'^-yos-^•* ^h eg rg ~* rs> ~* (\j

tT>—<lT*<NJfNJr-P^<NJ«C-<fMC0iM-O^-<rvj-J-.

V CO •

-J •

HO-'-rtaiff'mmNifirtOlOHCM^iMONM-rON'OmN'-ff'O-OO-'r,*«-«CD<M*»<>c^tf**r,-M'***-«^3'*'^»roc^i-t0>s <Ni«'rgog3Otr>g3f*'»f»*or-r-oo*'^CDcg*wrf\4wOfno*'0,4 rM*>J<,goocDcomo^o**r^^oooj«'m'0

• *-ocrinrir^o^N<M/\N-oi o cr co

o < r»f^«-«o<oeoirto<N>cD«o<-t04'f^4, <ocosi ••

1 ^^^MO^no^l^•-•^f^ig^rt^as ^^^or-»^*^"• r* m •« ** r*" cm m n* «o -* m <nj «-• * i*>

1 g3P*r-<Nf'*eD<ocDtni^»-tOO*'O0*«N**)w3«-io,v *>mo*eDO^ r- o o p» •-« mI f\(--co>or-*^-'^^0-^j-ccr*-(\isOJ''-'0--»--)mo>*ocD^iNia-i*r^o<Ni1 irMn<oo(i)«'#<oo#o«o>oaD^«'ON«<oco4'iP<oo<04rin9, a>>oo>4 1oO <NJ O <*> m^-i^^HOrgilMriNmOOMHp-< M f«- -) <\j <M rsj (^ *-• CO O —

I • •••••••*••••••••••••••••••••••••OOOO—iOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO — 0000-*— o

I >oa)^MOu>mfgciJ>0-i)^fs'0'0-yo1 c-a^-0^jDf^>r-cor»*-yiDr*co—i(7>o>Oco

• if\cfoofft<M',*Otf\irrh-^«>iOx ^coo^oJ3',*f*"(N»moo«<>rgjm*mootMOx• oomeo«Ti^ir*f>*rg]^)Oif>0<-«r*^<voooa)«-ii-i^^coirin-Hr»*NrgiAin• 000000000^00000000000 000000000000mi • •••••••••••••••••••••••«•••••••

03 I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

rsi o r* to m m «*^•t — —• <M <\i <m

Ol -O -C ,0 O <G £> -

»- u* I

uj Z •

C£ I

2 co — <n m * a. H}r*coa-o^rsjm^if>of^cccro^<Mf^-3'if»or«-co^o-*f\jmml I rtM«Hrt^«^rt«ft*NNPgNNOJNWIMinmmm> 3 t

UJ X •

153

Page 166: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

j i o m ^hhhia p4 m **^s-*nj ^- o <- r\i^r*j^»f»»-^u\«-i-*X I OOOO— OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO^hOOOO — '-Oo ••••••••••••.••••••••••••

^ H I ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo£ I

3 I•- •

r •

O « O ^# «(M<N rg <0 O O ~* -- © O =-* O O £> © c — frj^r*< I 0~*©0©©Org O O — O O -- O O — OOOOOOO©(_> I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\/ l/> I •••*>••«••••••••••*•• ••••••••••••

CD I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-J •

I

I

_j 1 fNjfsjfNjo-pg.j-^tnC' ^oco», r**irvcoo'NJ'M'^^»rvff'*fV'T^^-o(*,*inf*'0*'X. I 0*-*0 0<J-000<-<OOOr\j<MMO~*00«-*OOOrijOfriO~<~OtrimO© I • * • •

/^£ • OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQC I

ui I

a •

a •

O I O0--N--p-0O^ O — ©©iMOO©OOf\*©00«M-*-*©rgOO»-»^*V I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

t/l « •• •••••• • «••••••••••••••••>•••• •ffi

I

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

rgco*M*'Mff, Oifveoir* ^(yi *(r»coa,-r"io^-^o)CT^a' — o*^ f\j i*» *-•.*(**,

O**^m.rf*»''O*»''»'(**i^^*»*Ot>ff'^*^»«*0*r<D<Vtf'»*ff*fl0'>0'NI«**.O'**tfv't?'<\irsi<^^^rg^rnrsir^oi^^^(JOir>f*K <Nl(Ni<7k (>im^a4 (N|(\l<r^Of*%r^a3fNi0^-00<N*000^000~«<\iOOOOOOO©©-*©csloO-*Om^OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

ryf\ir«'tnff'r,*CT»tf\iA©'--<0mfn<r'#''»rijfsjfsj-«'ft>*, *n-»'00»^*'\-»ir«^«-»000-«OOOOOrN,0 — OO—OOOOO-'OOO-' — ~ O — OOO-*000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

OiTN-OO^Ki^i

1 om(romo«•-*O9> J^^•4^o(0(^JKt48>4)^>fl(^NNl^(r)^O^N^1 r-^-in f ^1* * f»-,o<}N©r»*mif*^o©cDO', CDfNjflD','»**>'»T>iP'"'COC'©o> ^,, *OP*"

i/ii ••••••••••••••••••••••••••>••••CC I 0©~H-«-«--^OOr^O^OO^OO©©0-«0©©^^-"0-^00^-«

oo^o-o-o-oor- r*-T- r» r- r» ao <d cocD<oaiA<osoaiiS(>ot 9t o<o«9'(M7t

J 5h

Page 167: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

G ~ O O «Mo o ^— o —

u *-O 4a x

UIUat -"Q.I-

z z« <DC >-»- 3

I- z« za a

1U tf\wo •UI 4ocozUI v»l->-Z< — oSOU

_ll/*

a ui —o «0*-ui

OuxK13

— <oat m

a uj i

3 o mo •-ua«o a> i

o *«i * —X »UI */» t

_l « -"ai _iooua X zIlUO— X> z a.z

X —. — Ofo O JO<«UUhX fl 1 1

—•»«-> uO 1 4CILU41 UI— U. -1 u.

1- 1K»<UI «n i -J « Ot Z —UI •*

i 3 >- O Xx. at i UI X —3 UI 1 o o >- - o« »- i < M j 3 uiz U 1 Z X — _J —-1 < i — 4JJ

a. i •4 U. O O 0.z < I at o a a.

X 1 O ui 3U 1

1

x o j t/>

UI 1 •« o at — atK 1 t-ziut-mO UI > Z VI

V) 1 -_! •« —

3

t- </>

155

Page 168: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

\A OO uuZ X3 l/> LLO < LLa 3 a

t- Ia a

i v* < o1 o t- H-1 z V» t/>

1 31 o t- LLi a < o

*/»

=>*/> oa oc — ZZ UJ > OC3 1- LU Oc u. OC »-a. < a. i/y

u.u. uc — -z £ LU3 =3 LUDC O LL

© ©o oo o

W1 trt

X X

a au. u.

UL *- w>O «X Ofz a 3z> z> aoc a x

O XZ 'J3 Z

z < oc— OC 3*x 3 oa a x

Z X— o« z

> >-

(X <c o

*1 CG

> 3uj Z

©^•to-x^'-"^"^ o Nino o)4 coooo o* •-• o -o -• o 0" (\i-*ty>^-«rsi.fn«-«i7*-i <M-i rsj»f» (^ -r * <%j — •O

itncdooo^nno* to in ** m o* <^m o^

mo* Ofr»©oo*MririrO(Ni«-»Mwoc-'C^f"Cf'M'.* o mom in oi^ con©o©-*^»o*^m ocfMcoo^r-t-iO^co©MP^tfM^j-OOfVODinO'O iC fsj IN t*\

* ^ o in id ^ ^ ko**^<o^(0^iro4.— — ir> lp r- c- o ^O^OOrvif^o^o^O"'^*

m ao m m *>j * «« m r- — or-— c m N«mNiT^ro^cC. «^£T CO*m* (N; O O iT OC (D • -O *Ni^-f-iP(D mC-^^^ODm »ir © 0*©Ofymr-ox ^a''rvisjiNor*-0(N»-^oDm*H*\»f"- o co «n* © mmj-m^mnj

tTirsmmmtM^r'-aD m oo ^ <v -a* .© .* ui mm^-TO^'Oto-ou^'* a* r»- m # a* —«©*? coeor-ocgipCNOP'* <n» -* —• m m tr *r m *nj

ooo oooo©ooooooooo©©oo o©o©oooo©ooooo©

00OO*OClOO^Mi'imif\«mOOOrg-^O^f^iO^r^omrsj^ciMrory OD — 0*0''

«*\if% o rvi © r* p» r- co rsji*ict*ox co**,*ifv©©

ei co f* m r» f» # i-nor\j%3-o<%i-o.j- co p** r*

C0-*rr»0x f*'l<NI<Nir'-©f»-C0C0C0'\l'irO0*^'<nj r» co © m hi -« r» m oonc c coo1 (Msoir>HONNooi^oooomoNoiPoooooooooooooooooo

O —• O © 00 -

(V —«

#OOOIA<-* *\j *o o h« -

o ~ oooooo— o oo o o o o o —

mmmN4'ifia<-*Nooff'Hm + iDO<o

©mcoomcor-coo tpir>«a, i/\ac^^os O>'tn

if»iAir*tf'OiOO^r*'a;GDODcDODOx ox ^o

f\t m © mo ir o p*j

C* m ^ fSJ

O Offs ^9. ^.

m m

O LU uZ X ~~ O CO— Z 3

a oc ocLU LU I

z a a 1

Jht-U3 < 4»X _l _l —— => 3 Oirt z x

•-« N- W»O LO LO Oz —— 00-1K Z Z O3 - — L-lOKKD3 J-j a o <_j 1-

< U.U.OLL LL LL I—

z 00— Z Z u.« o 3 a

jjja« < < z

o 00 a-»-- a.

156-

Page 169: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

—J I 0**mtf\ifvu*\<»'*r,fc «"«f»*f\tf*mtf*tf*r»0X • tf*.ut4rcMOa><Ocoo**<r«, r*NOOOOr-O I •••••• •

onH^^i^^ivjcraioo^O'NiMoirico_j t mif*mf^tf\^©tf\JO'»'Cocr>—if^-O'TOflD

Ol ••- ••••X —tOOrnOom^OOJ-—«<NJO^OOO

I ^0«AN^OOU>I <Omir»fM.»fMCM#m

x. i *MO«-»r*-»M'-«r,»f^cMOl • ••••••••x

ooooooooo

r»«Q©mmoeocoif>o*n co <fiooo>o« • ococMCMjjr,»m©f*>*^fn<nf'-^r*\.cotf"»' • ^•o*if*f^*3'a, »*ocor*»if*if*ttf\ir>**.», omi ••••••••••••••••m i OcM<-«©mfM©mco©o»-«.»-*><MmcMO

• to oi if* eni m ~

o ir» m**ir* r»©O f-m tn oc

cM»fMr-ocor»»r«-if*co**eocM

lO-OCt O O CM

CM CM

if* ^# 43 <0if\ o -o

nod rvj* on O in *- CO cm cm «

o %oo*'CM-*o*o*'f,»f,»<o

<DO«r^(Oir*0D(M«-m'4(M(Nt

*>CM<CM tf\ «

ir— ao co — cr^-cr-o-s-r-r-mo

i cMorfc tnmooo*m*ft#r-mg3ccr,»»-«

i r-m*-«o©r-«g3rM~*cg.»*HCC^'mir#i m m o -^ «-• o m >o <- r^o^r^^-iiroo^

i "-<(n*(Oif<^irN*tf>«^wo*»* * <m co

l «-ifMr»m©mom<NtnOOmmomc0c0i ocoif*Of,-o©fl"*fr>^-«o»n'',-co«'*ico©

I if.j-r^jrriO-^0-- —

i in (Njm c>«»^o<-<*_i I C C M if if"- J". f^ CDv i ^o^'Ommr-—i»ro» •••••••••X I OOOOOOOOO

a i

•a «

lu l^.^'tf'OO©*-''©**_* I rsjmO«(NjmrguMT

tit I •••••••••si o^**or\i^©fy*>

vi o>oo<4)iAN#4)MAon«^oo^'Ol •••••••••••••••••rn*-imc<Mr\*, mr-r»cor-coor'*otnr>»f

• *>mrMeooffc mr-m«-«f»commtf\f—

' • «0«NHO#«9>NONHMsm<riv» I ••CD I ir*r*(h<t lf<oco<r^iv<r)iroirnf.'-« <

• — -» m cm mo -»**>cMm^<

I Omiftf*-U1fMfMOm>-tOm<\j<0»i">mf,I (T<Nj<-t«'iMi)rg(0(S<-<0<SO<00<rr

v i f***ir*>,oorMfp*f*>m.tf-oco*fn.0cO'.Ol ••«•••••••••x i -*-.of-com*-*oocD©fM~-«'CD'*-cM«

hi •-• <-* <M *-»

I tr>*NNOff1 C0O«C0NI^NP«NC, Nlfi' • cococMr*-o©cMco*-corM«-*«-«*MOiM©m

mi ••••••••••••••••••cd i omco*-«oco4ri^*oofMcooomcDr»-rMj * cMOOf^rncr''^fr**orn(^r**o,'tooir*flO^*

i --> . --•n —• w — j-

i ^p».f*»ocfvjfMr»flO*i aj®M ^NaJOf* f*I .#COC-OD'Mtf*OP*'»

tDtf.-« - iT> — OiAO• ir>ocomcoao~*<r^irO rsj o r*g rsj <%i cr rsi

i -^ * m

I Cd^MNN^O Oi ino^QNO^^Oi ocM-c^m^o.*-*-©

i I ^ m (VI a Mfi ^ Nm

i <or* o — <o o irt cd rg ^ m m coJ I co-3- ao oc <£<*- rg m cd r- r*- o a-VI fsieo cm o co o r*- cm cm m r>- *ooi ©mor-oor-cMOO^co-ocoor^mXI ••- ••• oin©o-*mor-cMO©o-*r-**omir\l WO1 co irt ©oo «iroos-(rl ^^ >o <m cm r- cm m *-• cm cm

i o o cm o f- ©_j » o •-• r* in *o coVI O O O CM O CMOl <-« m in m f» ©

©©•"•CMOOO^-^COOOCOO*fMiT-rMf'-cCfM—'fM'— —'00CD

<VJ»>«<^IX)<t<M<Oa)ll)m<DN

a- 0-Om-*0'-* ,OCM'tf'm'©i»-t ,r m<nn «mp ^* m ^* cm ^*

cm ~+

or* oo ~* <c co_J I CM«-i NN00-« If*VI »f* © O-*-© -O moi ©«-t*©r-*3<Mi*\©XI •

I ©oooooo<m-*

1 I OO CM CD m £> m <*> f- *M © CO fl' • •* f*» mo oco omcMmo^>cM

• oomomoooo©oco<o*^^»M©V»| ••••••••••••••••••CD I Of-r*-©CM<0©00©OcMOOflD*l*-tf\-J i COO o in —i co —' o in o ~- o -o

• ^4 »^m »*fM-**

) I 4> CO «-« CM O' I »f» CO If* © •» IH

• c— •» «o u> r- ov> i ••••••CD • O O -© -^ O ao-j • mommcor"

—t **OH»«<vn^moa)4)ir^irtO0> iri0srMCD'fir

I <* -G CO O O CO Oi o© co ©*•- * r-I OOtOOlMfO^H

CO I Olv)HO*rtO*ft

o i irtir\mm<o-o«r^f*»cococococooooo oi ifttniAm^wsor^-r-atcocococooooo oi (.nin^^-ooor-c**

Z Hi I MN(f\«ir*OMX)0, OM(MlTt«-tri4}','<&

> 3 I

uj Z •

Z COui X> 3uj Z

-^ f\jff»^ ip ^ n a» t>o ^' im * io< i

»- UJ I

uj X I

> => I

uj Z •

157

Page 170: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

i fffinf sr>if\^m i4«rfiMr»£«a«*<AorM<*i**<o*»a»*\i t rnc««mni« vtooo—ooooo— — ooooooox« ••oooooooo as i oooooooodoo ooooooo

/\ i 5 i

O I —IX t XIv a <m — -o o- in a> * r- — u i ooeo«ooxmeoa««Onon

via »•••••••• vn i • •••••••••••••••••a i sco«NO-e# e

oooooooooooooooooo_ii -ii

a •

i •

i f- — o- «c « « m o i en«cnN»cesN*«mo«r ini ronneMnxn tir»-©<Mf'^f-o»««M«».«Of»*i»-

j i r*Q*m<er»i/\ir\0*O ji m^em-ooMn-tfi^^^m^MnN I llVt) t)>f>* i0 M # H> Nl»"00*»»«*»m""<»i«>""«"'«a»«"«""x a -^oo — o-oooo AX I oooooooooooooooooo

I oc I

A I w •

e i at« i 0. a

iu i m«neM»n«« O aemmn»«eooo'emtf>«r>fnr>mF-_j ) ^^M^niMh'Oc u i e> 04o>MtiNNinmo««'S<OM*4#v i NxONnntnO v io*-mOf-«i~F-o~-« —noA<a«xma .......•• via • «..••••••••••••••» > oo""w« — m -»c- a a oooooooo-<ooo-"-"OoomJ • _i a

I I

I •

I — « O <M -O O «C <v O I »00««i««IO«>«0«<«»N«^ i nnOMMN(iv>4 -J * (AO^r»rvp4#oi>ittiMf^N#MmNVI N««#r^«ff>*4N VI O0O~OO~tQO<M(M00000O0AO I ••••••••• AO I ••••••••••••••••••

V>X I «nhMCI>««« XX I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOiu i rf«»<v«MMv a i'O I tf) * •> I— I XIm • o i

O i »«\o»«Mfi4»N oc lOiMf-.'^r-^in*^ — f-oooo-mm_i i«o-^off-r»»tf\o x i«c«-»iMO»i>jo»«»r-i"-«>o»mamX i h«o«sco««rg o i o o o o — — o -i <m o O o — <^o — o «iUVt I • •••••••• VVt I • •••••••••••••••••vaiir>iMr-«-fMor-mr- asa oooooooooooooooooo

ajii>0'p*~i^«emr» .j •

• -«CM NX— n •

• i

1 1 o- o (ftin mo «me>m»« o_1 1 * "•** Ntp^O -J 1 <•»»• « M oo> «ivc«ncnV. I m M^g>m<Mxij «s • 40 0* r* # CO (I" — O O KNt» 1 O a o-xoof»o-om«oor i'

i 000<MO-<00—> a o — m o <f\ » o o» so o i

••

i•

AZO«

a

1

I

a

M

• O «Mtll<MMni>- 1 om « rfi « o> -r *• 0* >^ -x f»i trv avr>o <M « « <M V i m <n • a -o o COdcnmN•

(A 1

• I

-oe«HmoxN I OOiA©-«»o«ir>oo«0'Or»i-..o*oo<nomr>OK><MOomtf\r>e>M«o

_J 1 *4 -i • •x m m f* m -* x(i^N#«m

oc • <oo««««««««««««««««

o i mtfMf>tf%«<04>'*-i>-aa3c«BO»o>o»o

ac •

>-UJ I

z a • o •utl»<> 3 Iuj Z I

OC I

I" 111 IW a • Mi^m«u,t<ork a</<OM(Mm«tn4>r*a<Ei i „...»...».«.».«.«> 3 I

158

Page 171: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

> Of- «-

a. >-

I V»I —I <XZlUOl-_ u

at I

zz

55aat

a a zte-

at v*

« — okouo _j </>

a. w-ac S3

O UIK«x5o •«

z mik o Ju* —i-.vox

u aono

— -»•£U JO<«UUI>-

Ml UM|L Jlk<* I « « « z —— i a •- o xat i ux —W • o o >- •- o>- « « — _i 3wui z I — -i ~

I _» _»

'ItI O -I v>

U I 4OK>0I w-I OUI>Z«l •»«I1-J<»S t/»

oc • «8' £

ooat Ia. u

159

Page 172: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

l/> I

O I«- I-I •O Im i

< i

¥- •

O I

IA OO UIz xo «a u.a. x o

»- roca:

i/> « oo --zvin

o on — £Zlu>Ko u. a t-0> < O. l/>

z a ui3 3 Uior uu.

u. 3U. >-QO »- Xz ~^3V1IAKZU• UI X

ui t— o> z z

oooooo

mmmmxx

u. v»U. UIO X

Z < Or.

-0t3< 3OC O X

Z <CUI X> 3

l\jOtf\tf>'-*€0f*p-OOIM0^I^C*-Om*'<Mm'O*

o» ~ €m r* *h tf% •-• ^ * m

M(om«9Hi«>Moio(Mi^os09>Oin9i^o#mNf»fli»*a)***iMiftmMOeOrt(yMno*

©m«, or--«r-»*'tf'0'*m*r>'^(rto*ioiM(*N'*

^«OfMOx r*-^irvr^<oir^^Q?o^'r<Mcomr->r

u>**»**4 ~« cm Q imcd !» -e o m <Min o

f*-tf%OMif*^- ,o^^f*oo*x^'ir»iftiM^^a5f-»rN

irvo^<o*y^^o^4r^mtf\iMaDGOu%«^irt*H4r<o<o*-4~OOOOOO©O*a>OO«MI^-*tf>-*-«-0e*OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O— oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

u>o,t mir(a3o«xfMm«-4iri«uMiM>-of>j<oo^oiA

comaor- Mitn<0(MMMiMtonNNin mm r» co

i^eo(M(MO^a>-ooa)mfno-rr^oocDr<j^fMfMifininnonoHON*4N^*<o-*4A'On0•"•00000000<»»<MOOlM«M"»«M©0-<r-

o* m *m w«i<n>o oCOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

iPNo* * m •««•« o »*> o o *o ^o o r> nm^-oo

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIM—•

iM<o-*i*»*nr^i^o»-«<r©-*'Mmoommc*>-*o

UUJUZ X —"USD— Z3

a. ocaUIUII

Z Q.Q. I

3«« »>X -J-> —•330

» OO _<Or: HZ O3~.»</>OKK3 = J

-IOO <_J h-< U.U.OU. u. u. h-zoo»z z u.< 3 30ct a at

aooo

lfitf*i^O"0 0*0»0>0-0'0>CP,"f*-r*'*^

160

Page 173: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

g3«, u**^gr, rgC*©cg~*r~Oir\OP»©C*-», -**r»'<»

-*<\J.f\imtf»^*m^r-m.-«.3-rgu-taO P» Pg 0* Pg gr ^o -o o *\io*^x*r,»pgoop,-p-pggD»\JC0u~>g3cD©

— -* >£> grPgPg^P-uDOOO^OtftmP^tfiPg©* Or- a> gp «*<*"iO r»J'»'g"*<,gu"'a)*^tf*u"»p-^-«©cpo>, p**

r\jP-OU'>C7,'0,'PgOs ^P'"''-*CO«CD««PgpncD -O rg

0^-t-fn-i©c01 »HmiTi^ior'g _ _^ _ «-. o O

I f\i o o_j * u> -o a*\ I OlAN(J | • • •

I I © o o

cr— <-HCD<Dcrvj-ooon-ir--*-ooo^iaj(^cr—<

coior*fn<Dr,»*'0'Off»tft'*'Oeorsj(r « -o o- ao u~*

ov «-»r»-cg<DiriPr>frigj-tf*<o«-«oor'-pg oohmt copnop«-ir»pn©o**©cor-cDif*gro,'Q>*g3pi"><r oCDg3P^»-«<Dr',-pgpgP',-*»'©cCG*grPnOP'*iftcjG-00

j i r- ^ o' I •-• if* <r\

1/1 • • . •

at i o o o

rja'tfmNMNNiriO(D-0'-, 0'T'riO-C'C ff<-TlT>^<HCD'a'(D<MOONir"Ov N^^<OCDlDl^O^4»r»ft%^tov '0 ,-^oor,fc <r <»- c^ o c- p- tr co •* gr in co.

a>-oo, -3"vTcrrr>oco-oir>CT% cE'0-ir'r- jj ^* m <r *f»

«, «\j-a"PggpPA#mPAg3(7'f\j»**'rsjp«jrPtgp«

p»pgj,opp>p,fc u'>gr,yjr^ir>p-oc7*t>pg p- ~* f— p- pgrgj^p*vppt*\igrp^<*^gpcopngr*o**p*- oocoh

f\l ppi pg —• j- —i

o •

3C l

flO-^PggrO^gaPgififiiOcg —'.—iO-0~a-o-.T^O—•

omf*- g3 o* p»j p~ O pg p^i g^ r- a, « p*- py tf» a> p- p- ~*

rgO—<OOlC(C-« f* CD « P- -« 0" ^ cc <o CO m CD 0>

0*u?»o*if»'Oof,-fT>-or*0'M'Oiru"irnor-oco *.-I fsj — <M

r"tmpnoP-'9''0> 'D ^»*m^n gjp-pgPsjcDP-cDtf*m —. **-> c-p-pgpgp-pgr-cDmr^.o-o—igrifiP^P*- i*-»

Ofym^^Ncof* t*i o* p» r»* p^ © gp ^>OOOir -*O ** O g> <"g gr g*«Mif\tf>.a>^rAOPgPMtf*0s CDP\JmtfmmfVTKNm* —«if\gP«-COP,-g3Pr»»f»tf»OG?>

pg cm « —

«n

pg O* P»

if* m ©o x .«

^ •

0«rf(NOuMfi^mMOi-iOincOOOi'iO9'OOf> O* r* l? injOido tf t7, g3O(7y -,,*g0*-tg3ifi'*C>'

»T»0©gpP*tf\pgcO*^P^ODeo»-«0,,*-*lf» ,-"«','*f-OPr*

OM-OCDO-iOvrO'O^lfiCD-'iM^O-. ,0 O CD f-i-m ** m j cd o o o* ifiOo^tDPA-^m^r— p-pg

CDOiT>g3iT\sOCDfnO"lf>lP> — O^-C (D r- CO <nj — lO .-nj

rg r\i od o- •-«<r*f»oif»**o g^p«gr~*fnp'^g^os »•*

0g<lgg>gpO^0*CD<«*^*Oir*r0g30*'CDC0C*OO-*(ONflCDrflON^rfiFHirirfiiNjcOircOO^f*^^i-««g-(\j*j'0«, i^'NiN<Dr*OONHrtO'^frl

o o p- (vj^cr- mop— cdp-op-ui ^ -» cm a, o ro

O O © O* gp(f*.OOgpPA^-tf\4fiU'i—iCC^mif\0 -*•-* p- gr- u"vgpp-~HOg3P»pnu*igrpnogrifitrir— pg«

_ m •-! m <-• -«

IA <P gp CD pm P- if» **- pm N>OCOOrA O c** O gr O gj CD

^O-r'NtfNl^M^O'jHNNO CDm o O C IT

<\Jc, Oini-<Os '0^)<D'*Mf<^OOr-0»r»00'NJ«n <oif< gr pa gj gr <r g3 p* eo p* p~ co ^Nmo***^

if*o »*gp-<pn.-»»-«(DPM

# a- a.CD -O tf>

_l r\j ^ m"X. ir> ifi eg

/\ oon a. aj p- *r*

eg *m ajQCL

o a; CC COp» tf,

X j-

o */>

V CD CM -o -o

-J a- -i o

0(0^ gr(7'fvig3'-'if*OcOCDOtAC0t\j-^ir\00P» O CM ir*grP*-O**«pg^-«PMO ,-, ~*P"-g3CD0v Omm* tf»sO—•cDcrrg<rir.n-iO^--Hf*-'^f%;co

©gOP-iftOiT^fMiOOu^cnp-gjcnOPM© cd m r«- c*t

ONO'04 OMMOOCO*#0>hM OiftOOOrgco p*- <a- m^ocOorMr-^^moOiPig-fNOaj mm»*(ftrk-gr, r-rgm(7-rrtirt<t'iifim*4

• o*o^g3>»"if*o>0'^oO'<», **>'Oav gD>*, '», gr'»"if»_J I *(NJOO>'^<,MA<D<DMOCDCOJ3IMOO,, rA^l^'^N.I fl*OCD^OlfiOCOOrt*0*i^*'», OflC,

01 a1 —•f^ooop«-c*''w gr— —•(ficr* — mccorgmcoX

i a-*'ri^ir.ooiN-T-^>ii\i«'M«o, -oo-oo» i if\mtf««»'»f*r,»g3'*"gpr,-»^cn*Njtf»mf,gmif*'^I I — f\j — <M _

r i • • •

• © *H O

m tf» m «MC«MOOr>og'-or»pgN*<oif.Or- r- r- ©oinaxDi-tr-^coooNcor-om

©g3ma;©0'^tf>ov '-<i,,-»r«0'»-tr-0'-*tf»'»-—i<M

OtDCNCNOtD j-i^irgr^ir-o-CDOmOOO Omom otfigpOog^p-PMPsJjp-gagp-^grcoPVJf>* m PMt>pgpngpg3gpopgp**aG0*o

if» r^ -< m CD —i

N0ir<<ococ0(&4'0 mgjJCNicr if»C7*corfc ©tf*rgrvj

—* m cr ooo^OiOMNOOir ^itn^om-'Onjcj, HO>«NHO'O^Hmir\Nj o rAin^r»in cdm-ff-fl-fnfT»ifi(nmtf\rgeDtf**f»^gificDOr-r-g3'M

if\ o^ o

>• • r-r*-r»r*'r-r-r»r-r-f,-r'-» >. | f^ rs.(^-r-p-r-r--r-f*-r^r-r*-r^f*-r^i r» r* r» r- r»oc • r* p- r*

^ -. o I

tu"tirtg9<04)4>g)gdg3 0g9r'»r»r»-r* o i * »*

a. i»- uJ •

> 3 •

UJ Z •

a i

r— uj i I— UJ I

ZCU • <-• rg mUJ i •

>=> •

UJ2 •

161

Page 174: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

i <0<r4)f\ioorgf*»<\jr»a)4)trii*io^«'F*>

_i I ONh- f\iii\*-r»o»r-*fM*oi,-*ooOl • •••••••••••••••••X 000(M~«NO**«*00OO000OO

1

OiAmfHinirin(0inoNinN«inm#tftNO©ooo-*o<n~^© — -*©oooo©ooor ooooooooooooooooooooo

t/> • ••••••••••••••••••A I OOOoOOtTNOO»»#-iifiO-«N VIZ) •

00 •

J

(sj i/\ #nNinmmirNHtf\ o # <^j a- -r <o conoOOOOOOOOO^tnOOofAOruOO^oooooooooooooooooooooo

• r»ootAr,*©«o»ou'\*Mo^*mo.rcro

i tf\f"-cf, ox f,-*'^*^os »Air*tf'»ffc cof*otAom*«4>(*\(rt«-tf\tf>«o<a'*H-^aoo<tf'f,b <o n otf>

OOONH*-fw^OO«000« OO AX • ooooooooooooooooooooo

o*, *^o****jox '**o>'*'.» ^ o tr\ ir tr *** m#Ne#««o>HO>oom(Mr«N(o^00OOO»M0-«NN-<lA«-*m

> i o<c©r-c»oa3«o*-©#r-r-©.*-(Do©*o«\t• o«m cm —io m o —• m*« co «** ci o- -*1 o f- m ** 4 o

t/ii *•••••••••••••••••••co • ooooooooo^^ooocsjo — oo^-o

vAO I

X X I

3 f» in j^oNNff'irini^a^-Tirin'i.r cd •# m*>j^a)^- '0*>i4Atf>#f,*o^m'>j"\ -T lA <fi o sj- O <J 0<NJ fflffl-iHtfH^H

- *5* o r- -a- O o«M «*

aN^«f-^''0,, f»**««**'MofMO,*'»ooo*r x

CO I

-J •

«>j oj * r* r- 4<O^Ok O)<o^<rO<,M^'^ot ok <t>^or- ^4>aor»tf\o4>if\Oin<rmra-^«^ o <m oOOOOoomrwirtOooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

*\i s© o o — o <MrgCr^Oir*eootf»cr»o**- o <n ©<r <o u*t it* <r *»tf\in<oiAirr-r» cn^^MT'O^aOOOOOO 000*iTOO-m^NO-<-OOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

-J I

O I

p-creo or»>omor*'tf><ocr*J^»CF>-*or»>*

<N) «o ia m#>«ONN«<o«r>*4«N«cDmON^«O*>rNNO<r(D(ra'«NO«U>0N

tfMT*ruO'irff, 00NtrffO''iffltf\#O« of- ^goO^OOOoOT'O^'Sj-O^r^^C*'0* * rg AOlPNNOhOh>0)A«i'N9>"4<09-00 ^^moAO* Hffl»<^K9>0>#(p

o <M

o i *«-tr>trvir\oo-£<o<{>04)4)<or»r»r»r'>- o • ***«r«inirtirt<o<6'0<{><o<6'0^)4>r,»^»f>»f||»

cc i

zaoi «, irv<or<-(uoH oofMP*t«(A^f>*<DOk O*> 3 I

Ul Z •

z ol i o «m <n

> 3 I

Ui Z I

*u%<or»QOcr'Oo<Mfn*tf>.or»c0crOo

J 62

Page 175: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

lf>-0 Of-

UiOOf Z33OK111

U>-O-aOf 30. X

UIO0f~at-

— <J t- »-z>-« < — o« oc Of ou»-

«

a -J «/>

a X 0. UJ ~ou of cd 3a o •f>t- Oh- 111

z z • 1/>UJ* < OUIlfot k- Of 3 3*- 3 O «

-1 z m 3U. -1 M O-loo UJ -.—a KIIM

H-z oUIZX — >-»- z - aor

*i oa. of UJ

Z »M— oof rx

Of in3tfn|_> — 4-

Utt «O CO Io »•

in * -<X »UVI IJ < «03 -IOO UlOf X Za o o— x» z a

— — ofO JO<«L»tUK

O I «lu.ui<~ I |U — U. -I u.

mi < < a z -*— I JI-QHa i uj i —111 I O O J- >- ot- I 4- J3UO I Z X — -J —« • -> « _l _lOf I < u. o oo.4 i ko a.

a

x i a uj 3U I XO JUII _J t- < <

Ul < O 0E — OfI- I t- Z UJ •- UJmi oui > z min • i— _i < »- 3

163

Page 176: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

1/1 oO UJz x3VIILO < ILQ. I OA I

</>

O I - Imi of of-j • </> -a oat o - h-vt i z </» */»

< 3_l » O I- u.< i a. < ot- i

o I

t- « (AV • 3

V) oOKxIz id > a3KUjOOlLOd-a. < a. <s>

u. uo -«t-2 CD UJ3 3 UlOf o u.

</> 1

»- 1

-1 I

3 1l/» •

Ul 1a •

•> t

H- 1 oom 1 oot- 1 ooZ 1 m m< 1

3 • »»«a i *

U. 3u. >- oO <- XZ — V3 </> WtZlll• UJ X

UJ (- O> z z

IL H- t/l

O -a Ofz a 33 3 ODC O X

UJ UJ--

mmx x

o xz u3 Za "*

*- l/l

z < Ofa 3

4 3 OKOI-J-J«l t/1

u. UJz Xo« zOf

1/1

>- >•

Of «»

o o

^r»^^«u>a^irtr*co^i<Ncoin^^^rtco^^cof^iP^<^^^^<c-^<NJCoo<D^coo^'NJ^«^> u>^o

cDo«, Mcowavr»«f^^«ao, ^Oi!^<T'CCTCOi^^tfOv vOOif'r-^»H^iN m j- <\i r* u"* co a> a: co <—< ir

•>4«N(Oin'4<-iMr^r>>«r*or^inmcDcor,>N<ONiNCO«9t (coisoN^^}(sja)<'iOtfsocO'4NGDN<o

m(^mo^mO(DN^gt^^brt^J^OMl^JM|r\l^to'^l<oo6of<^^l^Jl^•-•4'a)^^Olf^l<^o(^^, <oo^l

MmtfKiH«ri<D"«oco*HNOCNOir«n'v^eo oi^mOO a>^r*i-i<rp*©**^<*v*fM'»'^r*i«%fvi*-^^ir\^-Off-0)^-r*-o—iimc J3f«- i/i ^h rri -1 N u^ j fvjr».<*>f»'i^#tf\cD*r»r-<,»i'M<,OCffc <MC0eOC0C0**Ox ^'

tr>^-—iO—<OOOO-«-rOOOm^>OmG0OO(-r,OOO^OOOOOtr«OO'TO<^O^OOfJ-«.T-^oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

oO(omo«AJM<oommmHnonmo(MOot inoirioeomHh«m«0'(MC9'0«a)N90<ft

oif\^f» ^-o^N^>ori*^o^i^m(Nj-Of,*^0'X) «-irt^trm«-o«o«' -3- o <\i cd cd <n co o r*> m cr co ir< «(*-fflrsjfsjm*r«jfN*»n*\jrgm^'^^aOif»<M-»'r»'^i fMdj <ncc m m om'^^'Nimmmmmmrymr-mtom

«m«NV««(MONIMHO<-<(VJ^inN9>(DO^nOO"<lON H m<MO(nOO «mN«\HNmO'4l^«m-Hoooooooo^ooorNjtrtmornoo^ooo^ooooo*o^^ooo^oo**o<a-oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

•ooommoono oo<HNifiuMgoN"^^omo<oo'< moo*oo^-*o-^^oo*-*^o

ooooooooooooooo^ooooooooo-«ooooooooooooooooooo

i*-o»-i-^o«-*f»fy—• «-• o m HQiAi(tHf4MHin*4 rt-*^m**a»mrt-*o*>J o^oonn .-• r» o ~< © ry

l/MfilAl^lTi^'0-0'50000'01 ' CO CD CO CO CO CO CO C£ CO CD CO 0^ <? 0^ ff* 0^ C^ CT1

J 64

Page 177: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

3 v* u. 1 MO < IL »

(LIO 1

/\ 1

t/> (

O 1 t- x i o— ( Of QC 1

_J 1 t/i < Q • CO

a < o »- 1- 1 1*-

*/» i z *« v> • irv

i i - 3 • r-_) i O I- u_ 1

< i i a. < O i

»- i i

O 1 i r-t- ! i in • «\l

V 1 i 3 •

(/i o » <M4}0«oa w x. i O ** m o <vZ UJ > QC 1 *3H ILlO 1 <o m tf\ r-c>o u_ a. h- • M -£l ~->

a < a. «/» •

CO *u, • • oU. O 1 ^>

o *-•- 1 (TZffilU 1 a)3 3 UJ i (Ni

ae uu. i -9

H H N N

ec i

u. 3 I t-u. > O * •T -. ujO h- I 1

i o- «/1 UJ

z — >. I I <o UI^U.3 V»</» 1 i m X VIQ£ Z UJ i O UUiU• UJ I 1 Z I ~

UJ •- <-> ' I o — O CD

> Z Z i— Z 3

< MM |i-. (jo — —

ou. ' 1

•* — o au_ t- Wl i i m or o oO < a i i r- UJ ~. «z a 3i i • a ct a.

3 3 o i m uj uj oKOI > z a a uuo o•-22a

U. V> i <«\ t- o o «X

U» UJ i -• < « — xO X I *M JHt-Oz o D< 4W3 z 1 O r _i _> —Q£ M 1 -DOO

*n r X1- </» i m o <si tn c

Z < oc 1 CD z «-— a- 3 1 • •— O O -1«* 3 O 1 N KZZOCt o x • 3 — — >s>

O DC QL3 3 -J

J • _i o o <-J 1 O _j t-

<i m • -o <a u. u_ aU. UJ 1 • ll u- a. <—

Z X • o ZOO•- w 1 ~ Z Z U.

< z t «i 3 3 Qa — a a ot

«/> « • _J -J _J o> >- i m * < < zQL < i *- t- t- 3O O o o oo

*~ *- i- a

*- UJ I

Z IC I OUJ X I 4-> 3 •

165

Page 178: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

^rvj«CN^c0«03(Ciri rt -'<Da'-J01 '\lO'-'(i,iaifi'nj>0'0O5, J-r>jinOJ0'^'-'O->0ff,O^J)r'ifv

• o *_j • cr -a\ i g> r»

* --3 *«• m «a-<*>4-00'* »o t/t • •

o •

r i

«®ifiMT. fl-fflfvjaccc^tfirvjir'NT-o-ocDc -a- or*-coou-iO(MOJ^-^)^,rr--coOfn(r -co tf o n ^ to

4> o<o9t i^N«(hfn(Dff>rk cr^NOi^<)4>inHO^cooot '^'r<0'ff^<rtcD^iB(NjMi*>9tr^i-t>oO'0'-iio

*o *n

r\j if

a a>• •

a ©•4IM

fsj rg(SI o

ffi^M-O-^iT-O^ON-. o ^ * (D#mONNN W*IT •» c0Ox tT»fMir»O,k ir»O'''*»*Pto '*C>-«r*-.*rgcr'O*fNJ

l^O'tnOiOO'^n « O iT)-<0 OaimirtiOUMn^r^<HO^N(CiriN>rMOCO C7'f*-C7, OOf*-CDC0f*'irgOf>jg3«o*tf\fl0«-«00'r,» o c> ff- # —i i*- © g> r- eg tr. <?• * j> j- w o^ c oa-r-o^gs^ctOfMoargr*- &*q*oop-&o*

«> rg m <? m —> <M rg tf\ h o ion h m HiMHrn^fs]

1 ^c»0* «M

-J -* in"s. O CO<-3 • •

s: CO 0*<

i

eg 1M

if. ift

CO Oo —

*

<s> • •

m **tv-j m «\

• vf. ^ *r ?" o o iT> m *-« OM4)(Mir <* co if u> m tr* m 43 «-i.-tf\jf--ir.mir.aDc,j-o<rOtj->-j i ^ tr» r» tr«<c mr»m >r m^imo «m m •-« r- o « irt go f-or^coo^gj^r-^xmotfir-s i mo« f»- # o* ^ * h- i/\ co * r* »• m o (no^^c r» ir\i-«i\icD*-tco*».-*y(CDirtng^oi rg^«o<N*eoo coo,'*ooooir»C'*Ni<ooopgop-oou%ir*rneoo^O'^^u-»<oif*^-rgif*r-'Orgmg3Cl •

I (M^^OCNinO r*»rgOOOOoiT»U*»O(rOO*O*O^4'*«-«*Olf»OOmOP-^'^0^^OOg>^rO• •«« go i** (M m ir\ o^iOffi if. rr ir> o ^ co o* gs m if* «-» aa * r**.«-tfr\mO'-»'to oofim^-r«*>»*• «m •« »* cm t -o fnrgrg<n«-< * •* en »* *m »m CD * r^^r fNj<-«o*xiPr*,iir\*,gfnm

J l <MNs» i cor-

r • • •I CO TI -* *M

ao *-* « f^o*sj m-«M :-j o^ co o if* ^« co co m * -» co fn (MsnonoiMMoo^i^ch© CD iT» CO «-* <** r- & -T r- P— 1T> »£' *-• CO •—> -0 cr <-* CO 0"* -• CD r- 0^ -O O^ *"* ~i M O O" f* C^ -

<

rg«OON(DNONOUNOOON9>(DU\i-iOOOOOO0, Onin4OlSONN4>U\NNNCD<rM^NO

o — o <? —« & m ^ o eo-j-m*"-* »h if* co *t tf> © o <m tf»g>-*f\j*r»<M«cg^c>"-«rrt

O •-" —.CO C O O m CC 00 —: O mn # CDS N I^^MO^MNCO»* ^ »h -• rg oj —i -h .-.

• ir> uTt in IT* ifi -c o g}g34>g>>cg>g>i 1 QD 00 CO CD CC GO CO CO 00 CO CO s O* CT1 O^- s s 9s C^

Zai • H«Mm#ui^rta iOff, o^Nm*tf\*p*ooiJ*o ^Hpgfn#m<of*- x»cro-^'Mfn*trig>r»cCC7'0»-*rgf\ -r ir> -o

> 3 I

tu Z I

Z U3 • -^J

> 3 •

OJZ I

166

Page 179: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

« K-ir-j—oo—«-*»«% o r- r» r«- r— #N^#N4Nf>min#N4)M#'eD^«nirtMn ^» eo ** r*- o <r <r> <e o o_j I r-OffO'H 'riO'<NiO' O*M^f»*C>»0x '^COC^U^fMC7*^^C^35^O^rsj^r^f^tf»OA*CJ**'tnCM0D-*0x tf>

O I •••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••• •••••••X. • CMm*^^*CDm^rNlC>*lft^OO^Or^tA"«CM»«COO*tArMiriO«*Oi"4-*fMi-4fMCMtf,t«-*-«rMOfNJ~*

V I <MCMOC0tf^tAf*tc0OCMO • ••••*•••••Z I ooooo© — -*o —

o^»ai*wNOO*i/\(ra*ok *Ntti«ira)*-MOf,'«oo-oommff'm^a-rnntfa'iiajHIM0-NMN9>M«0t O9>OCl<tNfi^NON(r#O#>«Mr|N O-CC'ID- |^ «n 1 m m N 0-> r- tf> COW)| • •••••••••CD • —OOOOOOOOO-J I

*rgmr*ojir»<*»"-*m«)eoiA»H^*mooo'M<v<*»<o»*tf»^o-«tr(^«'^i^*rcDa>«' * cr ip m o ** -* ©

o-i/'^asoiMf'-cm'O «iM**«*4>co<MCDO<rr*c&iftf*-iri<o<0 (9#o>«ip«o cm u*> <-. ,£> r- r-t co m cr ~•-4 <-4 «M *-t mm C*1 .- ^h |^m ft ^ «h «W W mm mm

Ntsjmi?-^0'f-«J'<iO-Mf*OM(*Mfi>00'»-Otfr- -C cm r* -O CO U"- #HO^<0^lta ONN(0U^^O<04O«£irtftr*-C04N*)m<D<NJ **miTiN-ONOinf* (^MNtMOlA I*- CM <T r*. CT <T f- —

t « <\j — rg a « C- f*

-«^>o«*v-3-'M»s--«otf» -o •< if* ^> -« o» mc\i*om«M©o»* m<rmrj^i^a»r^O'f*-*omoc» ** ** co ^^«ociin«-j'Noa Nm^iriirin(0ON(0*4fiNN#f orsiN^ooo^'no^m^O4 co o c*i o <ommm<tinminm«^m(n<oio^^tPNniAmm en o m m ca c«,toc«to»Afn*cn^mf*ttfN* t>Au\

• cm r» ^ ©i o m cr <m

< i m o * ~i « m cr o

<M O *

O -y (

• C*\ CM0* *"

. mm ff-

i cm r*

oo ©»*©©-*<m»-**

i i o- © r- -o

' I c> tr\ <r cmiv» i • • • •

CD • mm O O O oo

CO *0* *#• CM

O O

£> *Ma- <c

CO I

-J I

rsicor^o cMf^<Ocotf\f»c«»ftmo^ <OHi«>(eom -o cm ** cm o »*- co co o o r» tr« * r» ifi © en co cm tf\ *c •-1*4^<— 0^co-rf^u^^O**<rO^O*u^cr — ^0-^^O^aD03-^u^O-^coa, ^-ir''Nir<^r-j-0'NiON^O«'4<HOOOs ^U\^lrtNOtAOlO'^(D'40'>iOra'0<rOs n<n09mcO -j- ,rs -y O cr C if* m -* CDHtfMnHNmffiAinO) oDO-'iOO'OOCD-'COCO-ff'ro^lOsOr-CD'^-^^O'rno^CT'^r^' mo NmCD^N««miimmd ^c^^* o*f-«»<ort*i*>oi *>r*'<o©»f\©f''»cM*) ip^M^-o^irfMNm- -o o s -o m

«-• »* m «* *« tr\ mm mm cm »* * C> ** CM ** cm * <*\ mm mm r%t ** *m mm

^oi^*«^mu^^<©^©^©^c^**u%f^^*cMCM«Mr-ocM©^Aj^<M©r-^*~otr>o-0''*'e'>Mrm®NrtmtDM'HO'Ng}«ntf^^^<r*oo-H*iTiiri^ ^ini^-r^oscD-^o O o co co m Nrgo f*nio^in^iAtk o>«^^^n<-*mo)ir«inoK tf>cD4}#N0^4>cocD«'(\icco^fNj^<ccoo^coNtf'orK©r^^w^***^^r^^eocD*cM*f*c>*4niPco^#*o^or»*r^(^n^^iAmcM^*c»f^»*^

mm -* —4 mm mm mm CM CM CM mm ** mm mm mm

I C*t CD h- O I

I O O i*» J- f

_J • r» O — rn 1

N, m * H% — «

/\ O • • • • •V» Z • «mNO>i<jj » fi -c o r- .

o fNi m <

QC •

O • <r & -r (M *

j 1 — r- o cr «

u V» I • • • •v cd 1 * r- if» if» 1

-J I <D O O O <

> m Ai> 0* r-u% cm

» m 4>- -*o• « CD

) m CD• CD <T

O* mmCM O•* CD

m -o

CM -O

|r^OOC^m0^^0^<>Orsl^O'NJ*^cA0^CMmC>(MC04>cX>w>gr^^^«O^iA^^CN'CD^fMCDCD^Om1 o#tf^Of-ocA^^irtox cDif»jr»<j'»*-^r,-cDOift* ftfOiPmNOM^oni^o^oONOajAininco1 a-ooMMnHiNjHir (D^DicivXfHAjQirfniA^omo^m^ ^coco-^r«-w*'*cocroo o^>co<r«*1 NO*f*tf\^#mBt^«n^*tftmrna)OinMeon*p^o»mi-i*oco*rtco<Ninm#4*r»mf^NN1 ^N^irooch04CDCO#c04)^rte irOtt^r>i4^#rACA (C^niONC>r^a}'H>^oor,,>0'>iiCNCO1 f-min o o O' "-< n ir oirt^M^Ai^HOf^^xMrvcoNUMsa) ir\ra-cM^<rrnr^ tr\cA*f*-cMrnr*~4CDfNj1*4 »-i f\) — mm m ^^ -^ |«\*4«-CM^^*^rnr'> mm mm

1 o^ommocooo~4<M

I 00*<OOOnhh\

caimp * ^iootrtiA^<M«, cncD^irt<o«'0<o*^cor-mn-cr> ^ •*r*iMco<9-<^tomrnc>cMr>-*i>i*<#mcDrMr^*tr^^mmr"f\ico*P"09iAr^cD^*w-^ou\fA»f*cDr^O^*^*r^^^comir>Otf»mfM^*cD

t m <o « )C\ r* -< » ^ « »-

trtlCD! mooooooooo

O 1 &&&&ir>iriif\\ri\T,&>G&&&&&&&r^^r~r-t^^r^&a}<x>&&GCD&<£<x><D&-&o-9*9'&&fr

2 CD 1 m<r^NO^co<ro — *Mm>r^^^a^^o^rg<^<r^or*<D^o«^m^a^or^<oc>o — (M<n#ino> 3 •

uj Z •

ZcO •— 'Mmj-»r*r^a;0,, O> 3 •

167

Page 180: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

CC iT- CD CT •* CO O rt * (DlB^ -o o o* *** o gjo^mr^^ocJ'OcoC'r^mr* ^> n<^o irt cr

O O O o o O -. rg — - o »Sl ~ — O O O O

r I O — — OCGOOO^o OMO^O-"-0-NONOOOOO-<- -.OOOOO ATI OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

-I •

00'^i^CD0gr0c***Mtf\*nof\l«-o©f'yr'-^i0*\j00<E^CDo^0»r-(*tg3c0ffc *

mOOO*< **o©-*OOoOO©im©©000*>JO<VJoOOOoOOoOoOo> I^OOOOOOOOOOOOO — —•—

o

'VI 1 ••••••••••*•••••••cc 000000000000000000

r,«f^oo«'^fto (*%Ot Os >a-o pN'CCtflDu^*^tf>r*'ir»ior*'^'<D«ff, ^*f^oi^*^oO'Of*CT, '00«r*m Is- — o >o <r <r r»- i*%coii>o,, C'r*cNiOif»oO'»i *ViPfc <ri<^eof*'fw o^'^C"0<N''>»' f^ ,o

c- m <si j^- —co-a-^Oir—» —• o © gj o ^- *"y

j- f^ a- ~ cr *d ir» r- f^ o <*\ * o <x (^ j- o &•

*^-HmLT>fNjrsir»-oii^r*c- — -o -x rsj o *-i <%i

JC I mhh-00 000 0-O^ONO-N«M^OimhOOO'-'*N''0-OhO AZ • OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

1 1 m<D©N»-o©oi K^«?f-^«'^o^^r-N(DN*ifl(\i©ir<r'0'^iM'\**<MOI I (r-*|f\<*»OOf\i©O^OJ3«**©*CCM<^f»"l©oo'Oo (ntf\«OOo'0^a«r»<\j,»-^0'*

(/> I ••••••••••••••••••••*••••••• •

IS oOOOfNimfgOooOoOOOmOOOOO-a* ©moOO©<\j©ooorgOo

) I - C lA«c CC -^CD^-.-Mf^^r^omrriO^' I g3<M*\|ofsj.-ioooi»g-OOooP*<7',©mw I • •••••••••••••*•••CD t OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

o I ~*

^JO**io^-**'^<D*»r>Oi r*off'^if<Of^^>or^'^^o«ritn'>jp*o^)i-«^ff'©m<or>jogrog9mf^m^9*g3mrvjfNioor'<-ooif\r>--cg<o*rr'--f*\c>o<D.rv^»fNrg3ifv<r»^«^#m^r*o*^*Oi^Otf»^0'*''Nifnofr*ftov ^rj^'mirtrfc or^of*-^^^«NO^r'^auMiiocoi-tN^iXiOC'^-tMcrm okrsr-LOcD<-gmo>3-f,^o.-v,(-g.j-os

^*r>f'\otr\(lg4'OfriOQD9t Of1^r^«, OOt <NtOO<r (><J(Drk*0<>JU^rrvrgo<oOfrt9k rfNo «* o o* * in* o r» * * wmo O NH(\j>4^(n ,-, —.

Vffl I

-J I

(M^(M^iA9'ri'M(ONOir\(D«-<o>^niS9, o^<rirot ^i^HncD^(ONOt omi^

Ok ^ITOk MO<IDN<9> CDtO^<9i 0»O00'**r»O<Da)-*^''^f*-O*'f\J^*r*'^*^ -O fO «•

tf\ ffc^O' p* o d <m iri coo1 ^c1 o o m O oo-coffi Ni/»o^oa, o-«irN co o in

1 o^^(^r*-romomr\jm»r(AiOoif\®j • rg*«ior-r*'COor-in<D^-',"-0'tf, miNJ'\j*"s. OOooO©«N(*loo0^cgoOOOO

X.Z • OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO3 »MX I

oc 1 r-r*-tr\mmo»*\mo^ooiri^m-*©m1 1 o^ii%«, tf\ir»tf\<p'ir»ifvo.T<x<rrg,or\ir«»O I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVWI ••••••••••••••••••

CD • OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

-I I

oj t*- co tf\ 0* £ o ir F*'i,,»tf>g3f'»©«Nj»*-<M«, fHf,fc '*»«M#<M<Na)*o*^g3om(D

mof-oftoo^oom^mog^moom ^ pg ^ gj r- NOfflN(\Jc^O(OW^c^<MI ryOO— «Oo — OO^o — o — •-— og^-i^r<M«0'vJ— 0--omr-im--fNO oo

1 (0 mm •* © o o o ^ r* » m f» »1 coc i^-mtn cr o ir> co *r >x «— .*

1 m o m ^* * moo ^ *o * f» f»I Om'MOrsi^-^OO^J-OO—i^h<t — <M

1 r-cgr*-oiri<Mooir\^o©o<NJor*-eoo

CD •

-I t

lDO'-^MMOmrgOMM^<M\N'T^N^fVOO^>T-fHirMN«M(CCft '-ntooo«> o«'orf>oomcoof-oooooo'0'0(*\oootrOom^'«> om

OMft «0*^ N(fl(> j- m £ o n£) ~> (*- m <*» ^ i*>*Mf*» mhmoo1

O $ I*- O -O J" 000(D«^OOh«OM4

O tC*OiG<C'G*CO-0<G*C>t C0IDa)lSCC<SOC0lD(0(0IMM>^0> 0' s o ff * * j j*i^ mmmm <oo <o<o^4^

1- m 1

2 is 1 ~*t>*tr\*ir\<or-<oo*Q~+tvt*tya-ir- g^r— u>ov Oor\if«\»'4r».©r»-coo*oorNjmgrmg3

> 3 •

*~ UJ •

ZOj I o<Mi^»m«0^C0ff'0ocyi> 3 I

UJ i t

\-# m -o **- tc

168

Page 181: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-J I

a>Ofw *^flOtfv*fvo^^^*'0'0^ir»>-'"'^'-"«-«<^ir>*ocotnr»«\j*M»n

OM«->Om0M0«^O«^0^OO0 O O O *-« -« O OOOOooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo

ooooooo*-ooooo«o-»oo oo«hoooo<->oooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooo

HomMno » o * * *© •-• r*- p- c\i ir* -»• *nj ir\tO<omNi^mmooHN(NtmiC0'O'4<MDnMnira}M(Dtf co^cto — ^-oi/io—t

oo©o«©~*ooooo~o~©ooooooo©o©oo

-I •

aj'0MC«, i00*«'ifi(r^if»o#ff'O#ooo^*, Noa'Ooifit*\ O ** m •-« *nj ^cNj*-».-tf\ii«*--«*»i-*oir»'"«oj.-ia>c\jcNjir*m<x>c\nr»

oooooo o-»ooooo — © —oooooo©oo©oo

r**«MO*, 0'MiO'nir*Om^-*, p^O'jrif»'»"<Ni<0(0'*" p^o*^^tf\^^*, mfMA*inf*(«fMor«-<of,-CT'Off,'«-*'^a>f,-p,"U^O'>i(DOO^O <** fsj O »ft O mONNH(\j*o*00«O^ONHOOO«0oooooo oooooooooooooooooooooo

-J *

o »*» * o <* 4r*^, oir»iom*<»'-**, *',-oir> oirjiftooNm^o•-» O © »* O O 0«~"00000«\lO<-t^©00<-'0©-^©-*0»*oooooooooo OOOOOOOOO OOOOO OOOO

I ^ *-»* O <D <D © CO <*"» IT CO r-.^J'(*^^--'0-T-J'^*tOOffs

j i tr if\co o om^ cd inm*' i\jtr*meo(7'fn'Otc*Mm*Miri**V. i *> o-> o m <o 4- N ^ o <o N (rvirt<-*O(Nirh-o<0<T^<D<Njrsj(Do i *OMnOHO^^ff, fl^*oooNNm#OM*i*ireo-<(hXI • •••

I ioOOiro^O«-«',*"-*flDOf***Or^mfg<0if»O00OO^-ffc (*»ff>

/\ I •-« -+ —

.

(*» « <\i -* OJ^fg^l^^lZ •a •

m io *40* <-• u> to go cd -» o* ir» ^m»oi^'-iMOiA^oi ov '-i^V IP- 'O'O * hOON N^N oa*OP-^^-*<NiC^f*-0^f^O

l (MO<"*rvO^or*-o>-trt0, o*(*tf^o<&aO'^r,iB,MU^^)i^'*io*'Mtf>Pa-

vii •••••••••••••••••*••••••••••ID I oOOOO»f\0»f***'^«**0*©00©rfc ^*f'',»'>J«^*f'", >0<'"l -«r*-!0-J • <M <M <4> P* tf% «M * (M #-t ,»> (\|

I

i

< i tfto(^0f\^ir\a)0,, p*on,\*», *'0or*^p**'«f»orom^^o<r

oi ^4)rk'NNh-i^ita N(Dcoco([;cDa3(0(ucoco(D70k ^cr(^0'Ok (r

QC I

H- Ul •

> => IuZ I

169

Page 182: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

ill c-1 asIII

PC >z •

o in -• o«

3e zu. oc eIL o o

UIOa. z ^ UI33 z VIO0£ 111 4111 X 111O V a. -1o« o a.0£ 3 _ia x ui -io > UIiii — UI o>i O o

XEz uo — v>

X l#No« u XUIU ec (M *•0C~ « m0.1- UI ir> 191 « VI o z1 — UI «Ia ac az z

Z uj at za»- UI V* 3— o — 1- Z OC— « < — o VI< OC oc oo

OJt/lz ~- « — <o

OCX a. ui OC **l

O u KOI OC UI I

a. a 30 mi/>»- UI- UI o — *z z »wi UJ u OC «« « o ui * OO 1

oe*- OC 3 3 o *>-3 o < WK«

-1 z m X X *U. -1 XO -1 UI «A Ioo UI — -l« —a oc ip x 03 -J

»- OOulzu a xzUIZ cooZ — * •- X»-z a> vz a.0C"» z« X a <O.OC UI

>« I

CI I— I

— — OCo _i o— — — >o

- i a >- <— •

oc I

UI I

OC I

•a I

X I

< < a z —3 »- O X

UIX —O O >- 1- o4-J3IUZ X — J —— < _l _l< a. o o a.ec o a, ao ui 3IUJW-II- « << u oc — ac*-2ujkujOlll>ZM>- -l< — 3

170

Page 183: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

D Uiz x3 l/> U.O « u.a x o

10 •o • >- z— • pc a-J • i/> « oO I C 1- >-

t/1 I ZMW• 3

-it D >- U-< i a. « o•- i

o •^ i \nv • 3

v» Oat*, —iz UJ > «3I-UIOo u. a i-a. a a. o

u. oO — l-

CC L> IL

ooooooNO

U.U.

U. 3u. * aO »- Xz «-«»

otzu

IL H- *»o « aZI33 3 OBE O X

O Xz <->

3 Z

z < a— a 3« 30a. o x

ff-^(\iNtf(ffi^o«NoiftOff'a)mcrtNN r\j*'«ntn-<o»«\i'*o****^a>o»*»»-*tfn****io»,<

mo>r«jr»cr>fNjis\o>ftfm*«»*r»iPtfmooom<Dr>J*i4>^moirtO^^^-*Qifii^<M4>fwh»4D»«C0N«M\(tffgirHe#o>^N«an9>NOHCtfiNnio>*r>>^oa)os^iriro<OAcir^^«0'Onift

Oir«-(ni^otnoa)r>jm(ntrk<o<ooo«'a)«'(Ar^r-or><->N*-i^«<sirsjor»a)(viriAvmmtf\««

o«OP-a3O>ao»ri**j**^^'r>.cD-0, i<i*o»fft f*, »«os *<M^^mf*<M**oj'vp*«om*<Mfgr»a3a3tf\*<v»*«*OP-<o*Njmo*«»*trtor»tf\«'0'^<-i«Mme-^>tfNrtmo«, fNj«4>ir*oa>comm^oi*\«Oir«o*<*t<o

-«m««m <r 9- ~ um«i*«\n -r r- FiN»r»**#<npgi»i'0»*h^om m »* « * m

^o»^mooo><rr»ir\a>m-*»«o>^r'-oo9> <*'ift<*^ir*^o-*mo>oO'Mr-0t<MO4>'>JfMp*9>>**fM*

OOOOOO—«—• -"©OO'M'VOOo-O^'MOO —»e><^-«©OOO-«O'M-«>0 — •yooooooooooooooooooooooooooo^ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

OOOOOOOOO^CDOOOOorvJOONOOOrMAJOOftJOOOOOrwOOOOOfMOOOOO

000'4 DONN'*OOONAOO«ON(rOOH ONriOOOO.'*ON**IAf*!k.QO OOOOOOO000000000000000000**0000000000000000000000000

^KVMO'^N^nfMOO^HmMAMOoiwNoiMOMmoNiMfflAHNo^o^Mntfthnso

000OOO0O000OO0OO»OO"0O0OOOOOOOOO0OO<»««O00000OO

»M *4*4*4NNN •* « -« »* <M *M «M

r*^-r»r*r»^f"f*^-^o><oa>B a>«(

J71

Page 184: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

3IAU, —.i-iO < ij_

Q. 2 OA. 1

t/1 1 commin^^-r^eoO 1 *- X «>00«NNOl/\*- 1 tt Ct-J I *rt < o MNOM -CO-nOO l O - - (\j — sD r- mN* r*O 1

1

Z »/> (/»

3ifiO^r-mfit^nn

-J 1 OK- u.•« 1 a < o*- 1

o • oomcvjf-^^ff'Ot- 1 irt ocrfl?' o fs* o* <^V 1 3

*/> o MO1 ir ^ o^o cdn * * «-• >©o a — 3: rgOir>-oa-iNirnir> O r- oo if\

z ui > a U"v (f\ ifi <0 ONO3t-tuO C\J«\| PN ^H ^ ~- — O fNj # mO U. QC i- m « * oa ^ a. *rt

or- & (Mr (n-oi^ X\ -H

ik CD1L.U or-ft*iOoi *'*0'o — »- hHojm* © ~- co2 ffi uj «"!Uir«"iNOm~-, CT'CO3 D IU (^ -J- rg o O O ^~

OCUIL 4- p4 ITt «N( «M »^

• IU IUJ >- O» z z

U. t- I/I

O < CCZ CC Z>3 3 aa. a i

o zz u=1 z

-«3«=> aHOI

O fM «© W C4 fM

OOOMOOOOoooooooo

ooooooooO^eoSCOOGOCOeooo-o.or-.o-o.o

to ajuj ~ u_

I 1/1uuoZ I —-uffl— z z>

o — —a•" o oKDOUj — ~a. ac at

fOu*vtf\trsmtr*tr»tf> UJ UJ oz a a ujo O-zza

iOCD»^«>J^>'^«-«*M *- O O «*©f-.-i.£)00'-*<M < — — XOOCNif^^OmM Jf-t-O

3 < < </»ooomoooo X _J _J~— 3 DOV» x X~ .- 1/1

iroom ooom O l/l */»o«\j tn ir\ r» it Otf^fM z —

"-> O O -Jm o .r w> go a> n cr oc z zo^ « — VI

o a qcD D-»

-J o o <r-c^tD^OCOifi^-o -J h-OflD^-0''r»>3'irico < u. u. o

U. U. u. t-oooei — ©oo z o a- z z u.« DOqc a: oc

irt

_J -J _J oo^*^MnHift < < < 2^»- ^-Do oooH- »- H- Q.

G •& O O O O ^ ^

m-m r- eo O <r m oIM OJ r* «r»

oooooooo

J 72

Page 185: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

o •

X I

^o»if»mf*otoo^*#^iPP-c>mpyotPeoPto eDmc7i ajCD^o>u>^^tf*mmo^Nm^cor^O^<\l^rsjOP-O^ii^^r^OJ^^^C00*^^C0Cr — O^r^CO^-^OCT' «^ifiMO'^OOD^ rt (D'J-CCOj' * •£> <£> P-

OOOH«ONNNOOO(n«>NN»ON*OOOOHH 0000»*0*J<-*m-* «-0000©000©rn-*t^—0

-J •

O I

it ifi ocd »«rgm r- tr< ^i »nj ^ o m in -j o-on N^irNom&Na: o r- o co o -* tn <m^- o — s « CD (D cooMnN * tf\ tf co c o <nj r-<o-*ir*<~"tfNr»mf\j * m •© r*» r- .© r» ryo r- o o f* <c tf* tr\ q* ~* t<\ -* o <© o oir^tno eoec^*«», iric»'NJ*'m o* m »* to cc m ro <njO^r-^OOtncomooo fMc^xoN^OOOOfcsNOOff- — —.m.3-.£)ir>o^aou^or--c>cDOo — <m o <x> o

ONNOeoo-iT'toooc'1 #o«mo«^OONO(MO'*HOHCi>OHO<oinrM<roino r-©o, ©ocDO<NJ<MO^^'flO' & r- &• o o ** rg o co o »-i o # •• tf**M»-ifw o'MO'-»"* ^* m * of-cotr*

r\j cd mi O1 ON m %3- CO f* CO <\) m O s P- 0* © P" ms>(*\0^<00 4>4 m u~v <r -d- .»• ^ O* »*h to ^r* <o ir> cd in o «•? co <r co -o -* 00 ir* r- <\ie7i 0^eo#<-«oeoiP o m m >r a* m m c^OfMC0ini^O(0NIDOOOmN<»'6^OOlDOO«Om>0«lMOtf'(h^O«ON'0^O«O««^OOONN^OOc, <D^COO^-<^^OOOO^CD^f^0^ij^OOa50 0CD*00 0«O^OCCOO^^mOfriOOO^JOOr*rgj'r-0

to <r r- — rn o con^h o eg r- ** — cr r- p- eo ir\ m ~ *-« o £> o -ot-4 <M •* <M <M <<r — ^ H N Kt Pft If*

r~ r» f» co mo**n co o p- m co »m oeo •-» on <oo rgcg-*r»j3-*-^©m eg r- •-• co o c> »• m u\ co« co <oo ^on 4) -4 m co r*N f* »* co m o« p- p- j-o-NiNjcoffO *^j * r- m if\ r»» co .r co <\j y*fi o^ fNi —i o -on r- m eg o p~ r- o*o ir» o o n<t mcgoegmu-to^or"* *m woo ir f\( ^ u><^oor-OMO«Ni (DOOM<b cooov ooo^-oo«Mo»-<os r»^'OOfninrnp-i-ttf> m f>- of-w* r- co o o to «-» rg eg o

co r* f* o ~* <si o *f\ v *\t to i*\ & -*eo \r> »< o *h (j-—iriff>'£io-j'C>^ o eg ^* »* m m o* «x ** omiNjNN * O <M CO »• eg m *" tf\ *0 O CO *» CO CO O*- H f» ffi O » IP t> M H <J» * *M *"g CD C* l/MTO*OOiTi-J-OO-O^J-OOrsjOmfMCr-— 0«TNOO*OWmOCOOCCNOf«NO^*inO*OCO C0(\JOO«^ NN--«

I ^ 00- * rj-o o iT« —• "i co cr 10 —• o f» o r- o * m ^* 00 —« u"» p- o-J 8 r- O *3- M 00 —« u-i -a- o m <o—• tJ> com o >o mnom o 0<0 OOiON>>»• in <v o* eg eg *> o p~ o o m •-• o* en © r- r»u\ m c m m en p» co en o -» oO I OOC0<MOOOtf»mOOO»f\#mC0f-O'O0x OOoO»n 10OOOC0OOmomfsj.-iOOOOa«»AOOOfNjeDOOOII ••••••••••••• • ••••••••••••••••• •••••*•••«> •••*•••••

I OO«MOOOHNOOOmONOOOC0C0OOinOQOOOOC0NO«NC0inHOOOOONOOOO«^9O1 *mN co r- co 000*40 r-*> 10 en eg eg oohct h eg eg o<om^1 ^-^ ~-» —• *-» en H -ieg ^ —. hi-- ^ -*

<-n 1

CO •

-J •

or*>r* >o r- o oirvcotr»*-< m eg eg 00 o in © * m en p- cm^ nco*o»>o con egj to * <» »* eg *-• to «-«if\ * f-m c* o> en o # p- t» 00 en m o r»

O O(NiOcCOr-0x C0OOOc0<Njr»'0x «rO0<k O OOOO^rOOO©P* O O cy >0 iO CT- o* o o © o co cooookmm^cooO O^MitONro^OOO^1 »-* iri f- —i o rn O OO^OH^OOOlOiM O O *r\ & # ^OOOOUMfiOOO^Nffl^O

co <f r- o <n co co n m -h o — r-^^ cr r- r- r* in j- O it (T -O

01 <ri(Mnininininin<o«<04)<o«^<0' COCOCOCOCOCOOCM>a'0, 0" o o o o o o 000

j. oj • HNm^in«r*cock o^NA«ir^^iscA OHNn^in«P'CDCK OMNi'i4i u>'ON<DCi'O^N(n>rtn<tfP' ooOhu£ 1 H<N«H^^H«P<iH(Ni(\jiNi(v(NNNfMN(Mrtmom<n(nrtrtmm**********UMf»>3 • .

373

Page 186: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

I o oI CD ©

X • o •#

O I • • mOOOOOOi-t^—t -h —iOO«-«0^m^^-*— .-»«"> i o o o o o o

i r^ftjo*r*^ON^o^*N^flO^(O^NONCocoN(^irt*ooco^Nrgi/>#^<)a3^co*eoa3rg(nf>-(r'00'Tf*, if»

w I • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••CD I 000000^^-HOOO^^OO<MO^rgOOOOOOOOOOOO^O^O<NJOOOOOOOOO"OmOOO

•"•r-eoo*- o r» o o m -» ir.yirtfwcO''-«*N^'NtP-P'-mco»-tcO'*-o,> -^<-•«a^mo*tf^or*«••-^^•tf^mmc^^*^f^^Aco«'•»• -o»» P«- *r O Pvif\tf"\<\l<rP*-f\lO'0,'©C0^ r^^Pw ©CTiJ^0x ^rvjPA^^0> ^m^0^C0Om0x 0*mr*rnrA^4F-»©-J, pn45 co t^ o r*-

F.iri?* or*o jMd oo*cooif*<M f- f- »* u*» «r a- n*«4)c o (\o cr if* © ui r- r- m u>ma;ir>NN<ONO o^otTi r* o •• *r

a* P"\ C O <\i iT> *Si if U~> CD -ii(^C1 0"C, ^00'J'J £ O ^ m (0 c ^ O MB lA i\ 'C^nm<f<On«'fl>NiO 'OI\JC>^hM|**, r*j*ocP"Ox ou"*^cOmfNjO,'ir»0'0 m co o *\i ,0 r- <-infs((n(\jm*o**ir'Tm*(n«, ^c*»r**r>j^fnfg eg eg *•*

•N CM *-4*H «

h- I f^ lA m j-hi^ n o^*o«-«c^ HC91 <-*o *3 rg *3 <m m co <\i tf» ^- co *o -* f- o, rgff, *N^ ^o 0>0ir * nmm* *k> moom-'OHiMOHinnoN nN tf^^-o^'^e>^f^^^cD^*(D^-'^o<r'0^'^^^J^lr^^*'0*^l^tomO'•^*'^i<^^o^^»^*^*<^l*>'* HI

NO-Tfr # o m co * o —« o co ** co if» « o« ^ ir»mp*f\j.^«Dmox u"» -o oom ^ p* r* «-»# mt— & (f\ •& ^* ^ CM © O <NJ P* f\J * -O tf\lf*C7*0 NCOHmOlfiOO^I *NJ imi*- *h p* o* o «• o p»a: r\j j- o u~» p» *f\ ^n ^* c>> © ^* O co * -tcsjoo ocof»'O^CT>irfl-(<i p* co o -o ^3 a: ,* o cd j©p-of-oo^otnooowacorsim iO«ff, ooo, oo»-«NO(J, oif. ryiAc?1 ^^ c\ o Noi^cwooN^oo-irn

t f\J —• O 4>

V) I • •

\r\ & -* tr\ * f- m ocon n o r\io o <r«-«ir\«-« oo^ w «omoi^ * m m 0* r» ry in ry .-. #CO r- * CO N ^ eg O rvj^Nf^ O^h <\J if\ \f\ (*} if\ Q-a~CDOt ~+r*if\-&, 'V f\j OQ I «-CC**f*\fNOx

OC0C0l/\NO'0« |OOOOlf'NOOcO<D'VlOOtOi-i(r(rOO'gir»C0(,iJ<lW^'r>NONO<ViN*OOO f^Cf, I^N^

-J • * #x. i co mU I (TO

CO Op\i m

f\»tMC0C0mOCDf^Pfc <vjryiACD*^PNJ^*C^OO^P**P»©«^C0ir»rnmmrnmr^£0Wi^*'0*^if(rO^OOftj^Nr^^N*r*O^*rt'^^c0Nu^irr^O*0*NO0K ^c0JC0O^^(JN *ccft(ONirin^ifi^opnmvop^co^ooomP^o^^cop^^PM^P^o^Offl^wacornc^tNjr^moo^©-oon^^(0'\«o!E rnvrim(Ary»^ft^co',^'Oif*ocoP**'*<Nico'M'NO^*m'#, ox r,-otf\o c^nnncn^^ch^cin

*"ioci'fNHOiriN0, '"^H*o«HCDoj'0«N(*^0,''a"^"-^(Mf^<^jp rg*" eg co <M

^^<^0*^i0x >O'1^0N *^0x >Ofl<^C'»^^ p,'r«'HC0^ x -a*'-«u>iAir*tr*f^'**^»AO<D'*'O^^rfc (M^^>», (D p» f\j s «m »« if\ CO *o^#oiri^*4, c^nco^^^r*oNO^rg>TinrgOino^^coc^co^NiP©oo^**'rc>c*wO(DiHac> lrN(n»p P» -* iT COPy0v P^PI"iO*\JO «3-*-Cs 'rl'^ ,N'-'*-« (*^'*>^*lA'*'Of*"f^'r*<M'*^^"rfc'^^0> <f* i£^'£C>(NjrsjirO'0 O •« * O C71 CD

^* m in p* ^^iT'r^ooO'Ommo m m tn ^-« ^ co -r -* m p- co "• -o *o ia « * tf>

rn »* m *-tco Ofsi*o —t -* p- mm <\i ~* m *h —m 1-4 <m pg

>- i p^ r*. r- i

0" U^ tf"^ U"> J"v tP ^ U~> -£> >0 -O <0 >0 •£> £ -O ' CO CD CO CC CD GO s x ff'ff'C>0*0x x OOOOOOOOO

> O • > 3 IUJ 2 • uj 2 •

J 74

Page 187: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

O I

a: •

© o^ r\j * # •# r* a- r«~i m cd o —• m co tt ^nsw « ^imo^no oh *mtc m o> .© oj r*> m »-- eo o© iTi rg C** OIM^ m * f\J CI Of* O O fNJ J- cc —i CD <^Je0COCOmr•f«"^C^0*, *T 0* CO m <* if\ ON OfHO^ SGO m © <N f- m CO O ^ N li^lP N f*^ m OOtfNtD fM(NiCO»f'H©"-«Ox r"- CO rs* CD O f*1 CT N M m m .» tf\OON^NO" »-«<-«©0"-"»Mi-t«-«—i--iO.-tOO©00000©0 — — 0.-«-«<-« — O0©0©000000©00000

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

O m cr -© •* m r\j it n *0-4^ O O rn o — o *) u> SO'IMh o> ONO1 ©* .# m m CO h d> <d (M f4M(\ «—• *\i co ifv *o t m o if' in -j u^ o m r*- *\j r- m m h fv(j>«*it>^*'H-< hOi\mh r- -o r^ f» •-* o m00©000-*HHOo©r\)ca©omO*HmOO©00©000© 00<->OrvjO<^>000000000 rgO^OOOO

oooooooooooooooooooooooooocoooooooooooooooooooooooooo

O I

z *

cr r- o o cr r- m m m o o o *) « in co o -x o if^nooa, *ifi«-'^ •-* m 4> «-« t/> j- r- o O «nj ooj o- r- m r* * m co o o- m o co »-< rg a-o^Mfi r^r-toooo^meoo m nq«« nihhnonnp- m *m o ir wo o it co a * * o* m co f- * * pge&coi^tniriiri^r* f— a- o* o © <* f- rg o ^-OONM*lONN(MOOO<riMHH(MONOOOOOOO 000«"''-'C'fM'— —'-'-'OOOOOO 000«->-«00000

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CD -* -r * ff* m h mo^NiO CO <© m © * CO m OOCNriJOO'NN **• <0<OtP «• f\l P» 0^ CD © «**»\irgf*- (Ticoo co r- ^ *3 * <\j m <\i ,-1 f<* ^* ,-« <\im.-»m*-r-cc*3f-« »« eg c\j •-« ocr iro-oc^oooHOONMHOoonmoomo Niroooo>^ooooO"ONHino«ooooooooo« o -o o o © o

oo oooooooooooooooo oooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

O*Nif«oc0ir(MNifir-*(fiirmif»£io .© *- c*> m r- oom^onh* o a- m o oOmoiow««**on <m o O -* r» <m coo<ooo><oiso^iDNOirifnHH«N * m —» m .© -fr cr- p» o m a* -* mM©©m^coco.£irvjgj)i\i«-«.#cooHCO — '#, CJ»fvj'*'1 , lf>0(0'00N i-»'Ni(fVHCM?, mf\jHpgr«' oiD-3-0-OiT\—i £ CO ^ C> CO (00^-4 m N mflUTi tf HCMDOIDOOirtO^r* -cm

to «, a"Oc>*Nr»*fM4'NNr>jOk (M»ic inrs*o«^r^coo^^r*co(^r^if\^«r-'0or*''-«r\i*coc>0'*'0'vjtf»o-^f** -r # co «* cc.

c nihO1 * o^ cooHOifi« ooco-a c>(^fnorginntfi*ioc7, or-(cco>Otf>f*, ir>f*<&r»ci)r"(DNN(cir «• — m m m mrvj^^-)r-iXifT>fM^-,^^.tM(Nj —• •• m «-•

*/» tCD I

-J I

m m fsj o* * m^O'niDir^ -o r\j m © 0* f*- r*Nifir*0(*'0-»tft«-t^coeoa)or*cN»>ja)OOortNO'M©'0(OOD'X(^PMBOin<MOH(NiOk CH(MmmO<llrirviH|f\NO, H4}n<-<({)^|fiOCD CN*nN*HNNi)*ONNMOHm .© lf> »T «"> © GOo cm? o * mmd o (> QiMMfw 'H Hh^f\Mr,icncoOfMOOffi«-ifia' , rg^ff, dr»o»H-0(rir(riHC>mmifi*«0«0O -c

-I i r-

o i mE I

-o m co mm© Nmnoco m cr» o o>oo m -* cc <-• o co <* — m m«noo* **f*s o o> rvi ^- in» <\i .-« c** «-« o* Mm h *•-*<*» m r*» o» m o m r*> ff* o * co <N »•« —• mm r\j o m m 4) •» co <m 10 ^ o o * e> — o o n *-• o* s •* * «r o »-• m «-• m co oOOmorsJOM^MOOOOMOf*'mOM^OOOOrnMOOO<NI00OHOr*-<)P**OOOO'-»HOOOf*»*tfNjmO*vm

• O © © — -< O^ — —t © o O M —joo-*o— oooooooo©oooo—ooooooooooooooo©o©oo

go i mV I inI o

V) t •co i m-J I m CO I

nor* moo -o m <m f- f»» -*•* a* rg r- h hh ^ t* r- cv * hh eo NNrf* r* o*m m 0* -o o o ho> oino o co cnj go o o * m mo^^t^m *•* <m cmtn o co

oooifiNO-v'COOoc^O'-'NhOHicoo oo^rooooo^oo — ccommoooooooOo o m m * o m mOO00OO—H0OO0<-i»-*OOcsiO*-<rj00OO0OOO0O0O<-<0*-t0M00O0O0000<^0m0O0O

r mm m in mm m <o o « *ooo«f COCOCOCOCOCOO,'C>CMM?ff- oooooooooooo

n i m ujii

175

Page 188: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

io«r^irMo^r»OtfMroOMm^NNcD(ooi^Nn^«a)N<oo«4m««<HOcoo<ONin«N'00«09>4''4roNa)p<M-j i <^^m*ommmmiNimommm*mom^r*^^o^^f^*0^mmmrNj«m«*mmr*«--#*'Oc\i^«>j©»*nj»*.-*V I OO~*OO<N*OOO0>mrMOOOOO<MOOm<0OOO0OO-4OOOOOOOOOmOOOOO'0m0OOOOOOo •••••• • •••*••• •••••• •••••• • ••••.•••AX • ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

X •

3 Imm I

X f

O I ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooovw |. ...•..•••..••....•..*...•.......*•.••••.••. ••.....•.s

i

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000-J I

I yy^-iO'Ocor-oos »?-o4rs)m-oxr-'S'Ov cD«cocop- -a- in r* a * s cr o^ **mcrffiO^NON^»iMT'-iN r* -j- j- Hi <r a- o1 ift «M«^a>«*mr*^m0*cDmao^^<DOa>r»>mmmr-^mcDm<\i«4comr*-«<>J <-> — m £ r* r- <n o o o o j- © g- Of>j cr

j 1 r^r^o^^^^m^^tcsffimco^mr^^MrNj^rsjcDrsj^^m^c^m^m^mmm^mf^oor^r^tt^mmof^^^NV I •^0<^0'-rnOOOO*5-<NiOOOOO(NtOCr-CDOOOOOOwCOOOOOOOO-iJ'0^aoor^>TOOOOOOO01 • •,••••••'••••••••••••••••'••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

/NX 1 ooooooooo^oooooooooooooooooooooooooo 000000 00000000000a 1

Uf I

a 1

a 1O 1 *^fw co^r^^r*mfl0^^mmrym^^^m^<^<^<Ofvj#^f*^r*^o> ^t^*^©er^©f^m(^^^o©f*.*m<Nimof''*V • ©000OOO0O0O0O0OO<-OQ«OOOOOO00O0OOO0000OO0OO000O00«-'O©O0

• *c o «=• 00m >o<r *^ir r»m o cor- © ~* o * * cd -a- m <s* ©a o-> r^<o1 o m <n nnn ^tfi ouMD >o s -• o co m *o co ~+ *s- in 0* o> o m c <\> .a- 00

_i * •"•©<>* m «\» m •* m o f*- * aj * .0 »•-* -* © ^» f^ co ^ r- o-* c-# oim rymV • 000^-*0~*~->OOOf\j-«00~0-*0©OOOOOOOQOOO~'OOao©0©000©00©000000AO I • •••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•'•••••••••• ••••«

xx

1

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003 I*- •XO I

ql • (\j eo o ftfflir m ~. o o ^ <t o •* off* mm ••mcoo mm iton« r- co

X 1 o in m im * <r oo-Ma ~> o O mo o & <m m p> m m 00 -* -r *n <r m «mU I 000000~««-«0000<M<VtOOAtO~4mOOOOOOOOOOOO**0*~<0 NOOOOOOOOONOmOOOO

• o ^* <* mm© —• m o^ m -< m* r» r-o m *m <mn imi/> o ^ ^ o cy» m p* mm-j 1 or-f*- co * h- ai m © r* ai co -o <r*sj m^> r*- m f- o in f» i- ^^*^o o* **vt ir» »*** mocr co m <t <r 00 •* ^» m <o ^> f^a^f-^O"© »* go »• m co * -* -cOl OOO«CCO'-ir«OOOM^Oa)NOQOOOiNOinmOOOi\'nO(N<?'--aiOOOOC'0, OOO^(tim»«OO?'XI* •

1 ©o<MOr-o<r>r-coo o m co * <rcoor,-m©ooonj—«©o©*itnor»-tf-m^-r 00000 oooo*nhmC" —

<

a 1 ~+Z •

o •

oc • .

<— o co r- r- o o <n* m co ff» fM •* m r- r» * m<r co © —» in ~» # <\*m <\» — rsj •*

v 1 «>•*** m cr> •£> © m in o r^r- r*- f%* « m «\i r- f\i -« © »* mm 0" m -4 m r-*\t• © O ~- ^O^OinOOOOO<rmoOOO«moO^-0 H^OOO^OO'J^O'S'mOOOONNOOO^ mCDf*-On-iCD

a. 1 ««««««^«««c<o««,«««o<o««4)««o«<o<o««««««««««««<o««^««««««c«c

CDtCCOCDCDCDC7'OOa'Cr'0'OC7" 0000 OOOOOO

•JC I

»-i*i 1•

>3 •

UiZ •

J76

Page 189: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

UJ o« z§2o <or 3O. X

— w oru JO< — O UJ t-— — — »o< LU.UJ-J

O l/> o *• XUJ u or ^ h-Ct "» < mO. 1- uj ir> o1 V> tflO » z1 •« UJ <• a or o z zZ Ul or ~ zo t- uj </> 3. o >- - z or>- « < — o tna on OtOU z <v»- < OJI/> ~ •«or x a. uu — or fno u IOI or uj i

a o » 3 omm i- Ut-UJ o — c-

z z • t/> ul oor -oa < oujjr O 03 1

at t- or 3 3 o»H- 3 o < v» * —

_l zmz X »U. _l X O —

1

UJ Ul •o o UJ —t *-. —1 < -1

a at m x CD J>- a c uiz u or x zUl Z a uor — >- — X1- z (JO > z ao- — z< X o <Q. a. UJ

>— •

or •

uj •

or )

< •

X I

U I

Ul I

O O J- «- o<-JDUZ X — _J«-— <JJa u. o o aor o a a.o uj 3x o -i </»

•a o or — ori- z UJ I- ujOm>2w>i- _J< — 3

177

Page 190: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

VI oo2 X3 VI u.O < u.a x aA

VIo t-i** a a.-1 vi «« oo a t- i-VI z

3VI VI

_l O -U.< a •a Ot-o1- VIV 3

1/ OO a. — XZ in > acJ UJ oC LL oc *-a <

IL

o. V)

U. uo •— t-2 CC UJ33Ua uu.

-I I

3 IVI l

< (

3 •

O I

o oo oooCO o

» •

UJ UJt~ -VI VI

VI v>

X X

U. V oonZ — V3 VI VIKZU• UJ X

UJ t- o> zza — —

O <a atZ 0£ 33 30a. o x

I- VIZ <oc— Ot 3< 30or a x

a <o o

Z u-U> X> 3Ul Z

r\j — m ru *(M*Hinoooin*

/joixOff'iiimiMnNMrnh*to*mtfi«nmmipmHr»a)

G*ODcor~o>*4~«F»f>jocoaDf*ia>

mO*-*tfi~*r»>OfMOU"infNJu"iw

o0t-'O'«'Or^c>j^rNj(r\*v\(M«timoooooooo-»oo -••-«oooooooooooooooo oooooooooooo

oooooooo oooonN

u-i4> m<MO'i/iaD<*iir*u,iocooao

fMC«-i'^j<v^tfio,*vi<M»-«o^<MCD'**crt tfiO«-i<v**'Jjk <*ii/i<rruftj•j~>000-'000<\IOO~-«oooooooooooooo

««(0IMOOO4O«hOhO

ooNmtfMno>fi^a}(fiN^4>fM*0DCgOI*lnj*«*l«D*li«l*>*l

OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

#-*r*»*c>j»*omf«itfi««>*fiifiO

#-*'>T-»-<J'4-tf\>0'0-0'000'0

f^Nn^i^4jr>>a}0t o>HNffi «*

r»co

VI UJUl ~ u.

X VIU UJUZ X —-OB— Z 3— oo — —

a. aceui uj o

zao.uio o— 22a>- o o <a — — XJ I- »- U3 < 4 VIX -1-1 ~— 3 30VI X XM M VIO VI VIOZ ""— O O _lor z z a3 - — i/>

QOCK3 3 -J

_jo a <_J I-4ILU.Ou. a. u. t-z OO— z z u.«t 33 Oor or or

VI_l -J -i o« < « 2I- I- 1- 3OO O O*- »- 1- a.

178

Page 191: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

i ONff'OOfNjnOMOiON^njI ^O«o,c0l'***f"*»*c0'<>iP«^O"

_j • •-•f»i*»mr-»-i*«-.ipo»*(Otpi».

o i • ••••••••»••••X i oOH««-mMn»nnHH

r»i

i /ni z• »*f-ttpm«-r»^incoojip.e^<o h-

VII ...... ........ID I OOOOOOOOO—iOO-.-.-J •

I irMin«^#o<D9'^BM#« i

ji ^MMrn^anfuriff'Ofn -i 1

\ I 0«m*N^ BO i'J^O'Oi V I © oOl • •••••••••••«• o I ••£lOOOOr-00-«©0000© I « o o

imo^oomoo^vh^aiii v too1/11 • ••••••«•»•••• VII ••COlOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CO I O O

o oo o. . • .

o oo oo oo©

o o o ooo o ooo

r oo oo oo

• 9<ooo

CO — »o moiooo

oooooooo

I** o» IP-* Nl\r O IPooooooooo — ooo«-

• iiiMmBb#Miiirm«a«oI .-*%r~OOr~l^-rr~01'mmO*f*-j i o*tf\<eirv<Of*im4>ccr»r»<MiNj»4

VI IP*«M(nMf-jO«fflOCOOl ..............CI «MOMMJ-ml^« CVIMI^

oooooo

oo o o ooo o o o

O IT. «,IP >C OlUN « «

o oo o o o• •*•••o oo o o o

CD I OOOOOOOOO<NOOC0tf>

^|IINC*'OIIMMOMP#^^'* UJ I

I MUMI<f-»n-C"--I^N« V I ooooooool/ll • ••••••••••••• |/|l ••••••••Ol fl-m(vo*iMPimi50<#ifl CO! OOOOOOOO o o o o o o

rt^o*MN i o m -* i o#i*i#iM#in9>a)00*ifitf\4I -r CO •£ O* 9> • I A (M^ I MMMN^MfOO^VOtO

J I Ol O O- O Ol J I * f* CO J I (PinNr-QMIfl^DIMM^DMsiOooooooooAitfiNttn n.ioo©oooooOooooio. >»ioifict>ojao40>^».«m»40-<rOl •••••••••••••• Ol • ••••••••••••• AO I ••••••••••••••XI OOOOOOOOOO^im«j--«^ XI OOOOOOOOOQOOrS VI X I ^«C*«^r*^^-.ONO* #

• "• -* l uj l -* im ip -. tp *o * mip <o -r *k l /\ i o i mII W I — 1

I o • a •

I ~o — -a- eo <v i- • —' ^^ o i # ^mfinHm^^^a^A*i • ^ «o ip ,0 o v • o -«0'_jir-*'-c*.c»ov*f-o*'r©r'-<-.o»*

• oooooooo©c»iP9'oico i ooooooooooooqn x inox ii>rk-r*tf\«'0>^r»oo^f<.VI I *•.........••• W I • ••.•••»•••••• UVI I ..............CGI OOOOOOOOOCOOOOIP SI OOOOOOOOOr-O©** VOI *«IN«l««in*NB<«Nn«l_l I JI JI P|.«-I010l

-J IV IO I

r i

-« OIM» •"• I*

© O O OO O O O O 010 O 01 m t

OOOOOOOOOC0OOIP-*ol cm 01 r\

l i- 4 imI o » m

CO K> 0-m o* CO— O CO0- © IP

« •» *m © c*oi ip *\

r» C* 4 *» IM -O OIP M •* ©

O IP CO CD

OOOOOOOOO-TOOmc*o©©ooooo©o-©om© c

oi «

1 *• **•

r-

«%*-<or* vd it* m « tf\ o 4>

m

• isooo<nNmN«Na}9>oilk

Ol o oo oo oo o o»»o o •» «XI ..............

I o oo oo o o o o oo o o o

I I" OKt i co O* **

I © o ooo o o o © — o o o oVII ••••••••••••••CO I oooooooooooooo_l I

Of>- 1 f^ r- r» r- r- r- ^ r- r» r- •> r*- r* r- >- r- fs>r-r^f^r>r-r-p» r* ^ r* r~ t*

oc> r- i^r-r^r-r-r^r^i^r^ror- p»f«»

< 1O 1

1O I

T 1

r-eg

* -T

~ —• (%j rvj <m<oo£

o

* -* «r *- * * in *o

«-4 <-t nj im r\i

<o * ya iO 4 *oo£

rg ru rw <M ••^ IX*WIV

CC | a a»- UJZ> 3

<-* ^m*(noN«DOi O<-« N^#uj r>3

.-« <M l«\ lit O r- CO 0*OMlMrt# »-ujZ COUJ £> 3

<-< Ntnyrif^^ar^ujo^o -* f%* m *

179

Page 192: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

j I o**pgmO»*i'-u«4>*H«><#> r*jfM>. • ooooooooooooooo t • •••••••••••••

A I I oooooooooooooo

z •

«I 1 O O O O OO O O O -» — -i -> -»O I OO © O OOO O OO O OO o\f ^» t ••••••••••••••

a> I oooooooooooooo

• «r>jrMOv 'OCOf<\OF*«-«-CG<rr»I lAtfNOf-o.TCO^-o.^iriCr'COCO

XI 0OOO*-*00«-)00000OO I ••••»•••••••••

AX: I OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

O I o-lo .-1 0"»0»"> OfMooV I O O O O OO O OO OOO

(/I I ••••••••••••cc i ooooooooo ooo

oooo

AO oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CD CO >0— oooooooooooooooo

oooooooooooooo

Ol OOOOOOOOOfvjOO• ooooooooo — oo

0* <s

o tn

o •

— •

I OOOOOOOOOiMOOlCO I OOOOOOOOOoOOl-I I

u. i r»f-i»r»r-r»r-r"r"r»r-r>-r-i->-i i»r-f^i-i-f-r-r»r»f-f~r.f.r.

l

< i «^<cirt^eo^'Oa'tf'r>OtfNtf\Ol NNMM —• —• <N <N* *MI

o i »*«-**»iri'0«<D<i-o*'Cr I

ic i •

KWIZ co • -•'Sjmfl-^^f»(Sao^fyf*i#Ui X I OX.. MO> r> •

180

Page 193: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

UIOO oo

oc z33OKUJU >-

o«DC X0. X

O V> O "-• XUIU QC OJOC "" < mai- lu irt oi </> vt a • z• « UJ <i of oc o z zZUl a — Zo«- UJ «/1 3— o >->-Z OC•- < <i ~ o tn4 at a: oo Z IMt- < 0_l</> — oa X a. uj ~ oc moo OC CO 3 oc UJ •

a. o 3OT0*/»- UHtU l_> ~- <T

z z • VIUJ uoc <o< < OU1C O CO 1

a t- OC 3 3 o j-

>- 3 O < "i>:-«_l Z m 3 x «•

U. —

1

X o_j UJl/> |oo LU —' -o -1 «I "O. oc in r CD _1

t- OO UJz o OC X zUJ Z a. u oX •- • > — x>- z CD >- z aa *- z< X a <a. oc UJ

in i

*-

*< I

Of I

UJ •

*- •

<_> •

< I

oc •

< •

X •

O -JO<S-UUJI-— — — > o< £ u. Ut <UJ-U. JU-cx >- << «Cl ZhX »- O *

UJ I *-

4" J3UJZ X •- -1 ~*- < -I -J< u_ o o acld a. a.Q uj 3IO Ji^J H- < <t< O at «-• OCK 2 UJKWow>zw»- -J < «~ 3

181

Page 194: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

/\ I

V> •

o Ix I

_p Io I

vi •

I

-J I

< I

I- I

o I

t- i

V I

Z X3 v> u.o < u.0. 3 O

v> « oO t- l-Z VI VI

VI |

UJ I

Ot 1

>• 1

H- 1 oo•" • "" o»- 1 •r OZ 1 i»i in< ( • •

3 • — -c

»/» vi

XX

V) oQOG <-• £Z UJ > QC

u. <->

Z m uj

oeuu.

u_ >- aoi- IZ M VVZUJ• UJ XtUHU> Z Z

UL I- *S>

O < Cth a =)

o z> oa a x

LL v">

UL UJa xz u3 Z

z * a*- oc d« Z> OQC O X

> >QC <a o

z a>UJ X.> D

<M fNJ -^ -y IN* rg -r C- —

i

0> ff* « <C ^Jf^-^^inomoVHOoo>corsfa>Ox r>u%r^iNtCT'

r*ipf-a;eo»*ir>tno«*io

r- (\i co <— r- s m^N0i £ r»

OircooiAO^rsiOh-o^r-tfvCO fl fft> rr> -O ff> >ON O* CI

O a* O r» CO rg OCDUMSJ^ JhOhOhOhOhO^Ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

rnvricr-or-coo^-tf-corsiaj

«*ooooooo**oiriooooooooooo oo

f*r*<roi*tcoiri»n©© or*Noo^oomm<ONSi^

NinmN o in irc» o ^ h to

oooooooooooo

«r -*

*d o £> o o^o-o-^^-o-o^o

iNtm* m > cr> 0* «> tr >o <© r*

CD CT s fr O^CT'CT'CT'ff'O'O'O

•-tl^»m*'^^»o^,•a^c^ o —i o*

o oi _! 0-<M co mm <o o

0> mCD COIV m

UUJUZ X —— O CO— 23

"" Ooa«- Q oo: o ouj — —a. ds

UJ UJ I

z a. a i

-II- h. o3 < « VIr -j -i »— 3 3 OVI z I— -• VIO VI V) Qz ««— O O -1a z z o3 — — VIQKX3 3 _JJO O 1

-1 *•« u. u. ou. u. LL t~zoo

VIj -i -j o•a « •« 2*- l- »- 3o o o o

182

Page 195: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

I r*i at •* r- —« CO -O if. rg ir> o rrt

I —• ifv Pg -o

-Ji ja^c*»» I © O if. ifO I • • • •

x i oin*#

o —in 4)

o oP- o

— If.

O CO

p» oin ene> inm co

(t^MM Np4NO^

i o a* <?• r- t*\ r»

_j i o — — o — <^

O I ••••••r i o - — - — ^

e> * o r»* if* p* p* p» oa*\ p» m # — p*

* if* en cm c\t p»

OOONOO

I — — *NJ — * «N

x i o — — — — enb» iAX I oooooo

aj i*i rM if\ ir -« —i m p.|sj^ r-m«Nrg*^f>. ,o o o — O"

i o m f*- -o

NOOff1

I/* I • • • •

co • o — — o

rf\ enm a

— o

-r iTm enO O

O m «

CO C7> 1

IN P» I

— — — O csi O

— I iTf* N CO M »V l — eg rg rg m —

«

V) I •••••** I OOOOOO-I I

(ft «#

o o

rst Oen —o o

# p-o —

• N«ftJffl»-#• Mm (*» N * N• ooooooI ••••••t oooooo

i h-if-o* — in — iniNtNmr'-r*

i eNgrg3tnm*OPgmeo*o»ni * in o o a>

_J I ~ O <M if CDN. i r- m o ii o*

m enif mo o— 0*.

— to <o m r»•O cd -3- -r —m p- m m —

i ^crtooflDf*o- — o if. e\j

— O — if. O I

gD O * to r- •

O p- * if. <f* <

i <0P*0N P*p»Ogrmmgrmmi — — mop*p»in — enp-*- —1 rg if. p-» -a- e?- —i it r» m h « rj| — ^, ^ * sT — A.

oQV

o*n— oenmoco©g3enp*g3a- cr —. o r- rg p- m en in cn —in m ^if.^-oif.r-r^-c—.rr.— — — * * —

• N^049«^ IT NNmQ.*1 — sf>if>>Ofvjm-«-0— if*01 CM O m —<CO<MO>r^irsif.CD'N*f ••••••••••• 1/1

cco-crfsj^ — u-> co -« g^ — —rg rr\ tr\ —. m rr> O *• O g- CD —~HOrnoo»NCD— CQJ-g-. P*

o~ — — -"— ooo — oo Ar • ooooom

i co co nood ai « o h» o mI ^ m m rg *n ot

— CO o «•O fM ^ ^ fn rn ia

cc eg rwocoiroH") rO rg if. rg

•0^-N(NOOiTC»00-0

oooooooo o o -

o

i i ono-it *i • r* * «• *m •*

U"l I ••••••CD I oo o o o o

O^CO^O-J-fMNiONNNOtf*HrlOlO'N^* *lTOlNO*r-<#r**rgr*0D#o»f*P-

X *«mr-Bw*iDir»»mo

I o O — CO

I m C N^_j i r- r- p- o^n, • w m o o*

'i«^Nir i

rg on- O

r- eo— (NJ

* lf«

<o r-

o *nCD rg<o o

CO £>

ia r*

I 000<(D«lA- tftCOlOCOOi c^^om^inocM*- o o«i ^r-ir.sor-.-. — ^-if.crO'A

I M — M — -

I

i r*» r* cm rfi co «I -r * *<v*

* -0 CD w O" lf«

P- rg a* * t*\ o— IN -r •*3

I og O -O iNi

_i I m eg O —' ONNfg• OO o o

ITOCOOKN01 O -O r» rg CD ^

m COco m^ CD

If. 4> I

O r- i

o (O I

I — pg 9- m/ I — if. o *•

i en o o <mV> I • • • •

i o t^ o mji fw m * m

— IM o m i

co co <

x O <

• moc-ivgroOiNf-m — «\*

• fn(Oomo<r — — ogfgr —i com — inoif*o«««mm

i r- p* r* *

o o

f* cy

m mo o

B

I

OOOOOO

O I OOOOgfOOOOOXII ooooooooino

m oin o

i m o m *m-I I iMO *MN» I rg O If* —O • *vi cr* m *XI • • • •

i m m r» *n t

/\ i rg p» m *0 <

co o i

o m •

o m

«

o o t

jgrenmo i m co <m — mpgr* miiM-om ji lAirtm* o»pg— <vj cm p- co m s»i co-oo r*mm p-•COmgrtP OlO— — *-OOo-if.-oo>00»•••• XIicomoo io— — o<mooooooo> en co — * a •

•a- — * I

I o o o o — ©

I 0000*00000to i •••••••••••cd i oooomooo —

o

-j i — o

** Vp* or* o

l ifi — m oI o* rg en coI CO P- <M O

»rt i • • • •

CD I CO m 49 enj i eg en en en

m m i

m tn *

g> — •

©co .

I o to c' If. — .

p* m * <orn r» to inOrMNor-OMi\<i 0e>0

o CO f-p» en p*INAI4

OOOOOOOOO ONO— V

CO I oo o oen o* o

QC I 0-£<0«g}g3g3«g3«*9g3>. | r"p-p-r-p-p-f-r*r*-r-p^t*-

< • rMmgrm(0O^mmOg9rik

i ----- — rg rg cm rg

01 COlTOeXMTtrCMTCM^O

CC I «^>o«o««o««««>- i r"P-r"r»p-r*p»p*p^r,»r*p»

i

< i cgen«incoooinmog?p»Ol ^h_«,~.-.^.-^(MfsirgiMI

Ol JOC*e/ocA C*OC*0, e>Cf,X I -4

•* I Nm# inOiT

O I COO 9- t> o c

QC I

— uj I

Zoj I — Nen*if> O r^cooonrguj x I

> 3 •

UJ Z I

h- UJ I

O — <M ZiA I - eMmgrmgjP*ejoej»0 — e\(

— — — UJXI «^i —> 3 I

Zcoi — fMen^ingvr^cOtTO- eMuj £ I — —

> 3 I

uj Z •

Z CDuj X> 3uj Z

• im m «r rf» <o

183

Page 196: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

3

!*• r* CD O* 4} l*t

i <o «m <o o co tn

• O O O rr, ,-,•••••• o o © o o ©

• r%* •* f> * -4 -o

I O O O o o o• I •*••••

I o o © © o o

CD IT* -* m « <oI O O O O O <0J I * <n <^ *»•-, ^

O I •••••A£ I O © ©-1 © ©

CD I O O O O O O

i o m * 4)• <r cd »* <m

-J I HI OUXNJVI o —• o *>

/v O i • • • •£ X • O OOO

o oCM O*OJ CDo ^

OC I .(*» f*« |f» oX t # -a- tr\ t*\

«-> I o ©o oV VI I • • • •CD I O O O O

CD ~.

o oO O

-J » ir> r-

*m © * o m ©o o m © to o

© o m O m ©

QC • O 4> -© -O •© *£>

>- i r*- r»- n- r- r*- r-

O • OOx Ox Ov C7k O

2 (i) • r»<xicro»*rM

184

Page 197: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

iroooom o oo o

o «at xa z

o v> O •* XUJ o a ru *-K -" « ma. •- UJ tf» oi m l/l Q • zt — UJ«i a a oz zz Ul or ~

io - UJ w— <j t- f z ati- « « — o m< or or O o z w•- « — «a X 0. UJ — or i*\ou a id X or uu •

a o • 3omvii^ OI-IU 0""»z z •W UJ uot*< < OUI1C OdiOf K- at 31 3 o «•

t- 3 a < ifl km_l z m x x *•

U. -) X O _1 UJ VI «

o o UJ — — -I* —a auM m _iOO UJ

Z (9 Of x zUJ z a ooX — >- — x- z <s >- z a.a — z« X o <a. <x UJUJ uj a u.O t- o •*<

<-» — aeu -JO

V) I w ~ — >0— | UJ w .j_ _j u.

— i n h- a *a i uj i -*UJ • o o >- ^- of- I <•-• J3UJW I Z X ~ _l ~* i — < -J _ioc • < u. o a a.< i a o a a.x i o uj 3<-> I X O -J i^

I -J t- * <uj • < o oc — aH- • •- Z uj h- ujMl O uj > 2 i/i

»/» | - _i < — D

185

Page 198: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

v> oO UJz xo < u.o. xo^ 1

v> 1

01 1- r— • aa_l 1 m<DOl O I- H-VI I ZVtvl

• 3_) I O I- u.< • a < oh- 1

o t

V I

VI

o o— o<r O

v» OZu>Ko u. a h-a. < o. vi

O — •-Z EDUJ

o t- :

2 —•3 VI l

or z 1

u. *- v>o < aeZK33 3 Ok a x

VI v»

v> v>

X X

U. V)UL UJO X

H- VIZ <Qf— 0£ 3« 3 O

< VIU. UJZ X—« zoc ~

VI>- >•

a <o o

otft<o**ojmcom«, <6e>JO^-oom

O -1 MM

HHOOi^OA^O0'lP9tf4IMN

oujoa><rmincM**tnoo«-9>rijr'»<M~-rgr\irg u^.£>COOa>CfO — *Oa>r~

pgOm.»-»Mcu<oeocg.oiri.efn .3- o o—tu^OOOO-OOOr- CO CO (£ <\l rg o OO^»«*l^0s s -»•^-0, t\j o A r\t rg «^ a)

-fgaD^^N^«-Hfvir 00 <n <nj —

i

** -* *M «* ITIC4HH

^!4l<IHS>gr*tfl^^fQOF(H4/ir»crr-f-v*co©i*lif\***^f\i«-*>ogj**>hOHN^Oh-OOOOONNINoooooooooooo-«ooo0000000000000000

**—OOIf*l*\O»**r^^»g3mo*>0*moo**»-«ifiO''S*iN^com^<Njo,*jr*tf%f>jinw7*Og3<-«9'<rfNjf>-mtf>o<ocD

u^ — o a-in cvco in

in-a'cccorgtNjrM'OrMgriripg-crr^mr

4O(0HHNinAiroi*ir>ou\tfioON«KI«MM9'hh#OOIO^O(OO—'(-gooOOOOOO^— OO0000000000000000

»v-*»omooom©-*'MOcgr»MM

000000000000—000

— •^(ti^cof-^CD^Hio^inojtf**"^

X viUUIUz X —-U(D— Z 3

•- <_>

oo-00Of o oUJ — —a K oc

»zzct- o o <« — — X

— 3 30vi x rmmUIOtfll/lGZ "— O O _lK Z Z O3 — — VIo or a3 3_l

_l O O "»

_J (-« u. u. ou. u. u. t-Z o o— z z u.< 3 3 aaas

v>jjja4 < < z(->->- 3OOOO1- >- >- a.

4>#^>rmirin'Ooo4>

— fMC\^iri*j^'CDo>i o«-«',,gi** jr in gj

186

Page 199: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

_l I MO'OO-'ff'fflrjOitim^N^OCDV, I iTH4>Nir|OO(0Ha)OSOir(0Mo i • ••••*•••••••»••

i r»trtOy.aoir\eocroomr-trt,r*'0• O<C00^<#O>9'O<#-«r*iO'Otrt-*9*

\ ) e0*or»»*'O—»*, oc7»OfMir\c0'nt>O I ••• ••••••• o • *• ..*•••

*- • ©««Mrf\o*-co»*»r-Jjmo''©©> tf*o

»o t ••••••••••••••••_i • m

i o>f-om<o»*ina)r<iomo*fMf>»«>**

CD 00«4MHHMf«i4iMMO(rNNN-J t

* ICM^r-OmOtf^O — rtO*XNIS) I • ••••••••••••CD ( OOOOOOOOOOOOm

•• CD IMo to *o « If*

NO(hm cm «o* <o CM

IM (T» m*O <6 CM

* — CM

<M 0- sj-

4. IP ~<O * -*cm m o

o * *rMinco

<Cfncvr*<OiM0DcDOm•^a **ir *o i** o •* o

f» © cm ** r* o #qohOtCM-crOOOctmO*CM <M CM « IT*

-^•O* ©IT -h OM-Oir«<ccDfMfMir«4^trt'«cr <o <m ir* * moomcD

I 00 OCDi cr >o —• «m cm en

i*» «*» enr*. m mm * en

O >6<nO0} O ** win«*<n<ncn<MO<A<6tf>

-J

oj:

m co lf\0« OCOM IT o<CMnt> <O en N-(fi(fiN*M>j(omotro© cc o- nmM»\^^*ooa)oiP*cd<njO<njI"-co—rwv —nr ^ co r- »* co

«r»cMCMCMO> ^a\omo<o^cni^' 4>*m *-t«MCM IM CM •-• tf»

CD-1

O -O O f\i rr\ CO O-'ON-^OM-^f- O(AOOcd •oiMf-'^tf\coif»fMCDm»Mco0" CDtft O-OOO-Or-o-^^CMn^-

i o> i<\<M«MOHiro««co'r)co_j * o«coO(nciO<Mr«4iONv • cnoeM«n^«M*»*in»»^f»<Do I •••••••••••••x • ooooiMcMcn^mcM^***

• cM^mir^m^)a>*cMipcMr»i/i • • •••••••••••to* oooooooooooo-o

Of^iMOCM^^moof* in n\ r» *- <*«

Ot #^r»a}0<ro^cr^ON<c«o>(J'corMm^or^mcootfvOioni^tDVMncoo<<rt<or>ci)o<cooocNH(>i

** mtnto*MifMn(MtocM*-<mfM

•ao^tutco^^cDrntfto^cn•O if.

A • •*n^ NOi^MIMB t> (ft KOM

IMCMfH rt ft(N O^ «

I f* CO O* *+ O ^O lO — O tf <N !*

I^M^ONlO -0 *fi « ^> O f»iiftf^<D'crc*-mr»f^iftOif***• CD C0<O<Diftr'*tnCMCD>-*CStf\

i ten m^-m i^^Nr-ff" a>' «-> co *r -c co — «oo^«oin> cnino^«co'*»mrto

C^OCTM^ArAO^IM-ON^lPmNii\#aiM©r*eMn*ot> * p* tf\ m r*

mm«<-i* irttrtor^^fMifiCor^ocM-TftJiPO-N-O 0*-£i# O * O -T <M CO

*« »**• O CMIM ^

»- I r- tTt f* r\jr*ifico^m*-rsjr»-«r*fi<

i m -, —

***o*>in**<oo* * o> f- o <r r- *- tft <-> co tr o co o

t o ^ *f> r*. o ^ o m»iM#-II co — co — ->• -r •# c-o^oV t Nrt««NN -O * CO CO OO I OOON(0#N<ONOOO#^NIAX • •••••

• OooiMfm^moo^OHeoo• f* * -£» O tf> C* —« OCMCM^f• CO -* O -T »M <r OUX^O

-J c ca-K-^ooinN. B C0<M<cr~4CMr»CMOo i M^cM^ocnmoDirtXI ••••••••

i oco-*miT'^->m —» iirtcDmcMiOfMinr-t I #• *-" «N OJ

<0 CM I

m o <

** m i

• tft o 4

i~* en*

cm m i

I.p4 «

I CM HCOONnOOfiNff1 )

ji cn * ff>m©^- -.Oir«(fi<vi im r**Ocy^»J''ro,'OmiO I N ON#Ntf>NOO#«>lO<x

I 0000 + MfiM#Hrg<vi

it* « »r» r» -o o o * cm cm

O00cniis>ir(0ir«o*40i0ivttommr»-cMomm mcoo*^w cm -i rn —i o* c» r*- in

» locootft'croirto' iiMtncBtrtf^-^^co

cyti ••• •••••co » 4-o<omoeo<oc*t_j i mmm*ifvm*io

—«0^>^r*rfsO^» fr- l<cr f^onV^QffxOfi^-crr«--^(Njo<-"0 v itn iMmiMtTt«4>r-CDiAirt<OOO^NtnO N i MO">cmcrO«N«^cO<-i<

• MJ ••••••••••••(D iIM^ * f «J O -^ CO • oooo—«o-^-^oooo-i*l«*rtNNN^ -JO

> i (^r-P-r-i^-i^r-r^h-r-r-r-r^r-r-r- ^ i r.r-h-r.i^f^i^r-f^f^r-Kp-r-r-r^ >. | f- f«- f»- r» p- t*- r^ I

O I *#*'*if*tfitft^^^)Oj)f>-r-r-^- ttpo^>oo4)r-r>r^rw Ol C^tf^lftlPtOOO^CJOf'

at •

2 co i ^Nn*moNuj £ I

> 3 •

UJZ •

(DOO**Nin# IOO

187

Page 200: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

i p* « «\t i for"r»(\io>«Mfv*NO#o, o*r»«rMfl_j i p» oj -a- _j i **(sjrsii^oir>No*N*r-irOff'\ I OMO S ( 0"«OOHrgrg 0*»0 N •-• if, O O ^ OOl ••• O • • •••*•••••••••••El o -*-* /\3C I oooooooooooooooo

— I <Nj <M f*\

v i o e> r-w i • • •

•-• I

r i

o i oooooooooooowoooVtrtl •••«••••••••••••

CD I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I 0" <\| -«

J i (C in >\V. | o o* >oo • • • •

• m O CD ^ CD £ >-1 ^ r^ (\j O *• iT> <Nj tj-i J"•

•,, ^-o<M'NjCT>r-a-cD«-ir*oo*>Jf'>iA

01 • •••••••••••••••.a: i oooooo~«o~«^o<noooo

^ i *• a) f-v I o <T -i

(A I • • •CD I *<^^-J I

V • •-•0-*r'g<\t«-"««'»jr<'>«-<-*r<i»~»«-«if»ir*i

trt t •••••*•••••••••CD I OOOOOOOOOOOOfMOOO

I m o mI ,y ii^ 1*1

J I WONV. I tf> *> —

/SOI • • •w> E I cy cm *nuj i ocrco

_j i o-*^-moo,, f^o*mot-<r*coo<M—»vi ONOo^<vmo*i'i'*cooo^^

/NO I •;••••••••••••••rz:i oooooooooooooooo

— i

oc •O I tfinn_j t a) u"« oX i -O O r-

u w i • • •ViB I ~* VJ **%

i iAOx eocD^i-»*MfM«-t'OeDtr><D'Mrw '*'

• «-m-a-ir\i0u^'O^(f\#if»*'^OCT'C0> i oooooooooooooooor »/> I • •••••••••*••••„•cd i oooooooooooooooo

I -• CD —

i

I -0 -o -rI NNNI -4 P-OI * • •I f\i m m

<njiT # CO r** tA 0^ O €7*©oO*en —i ,0 (%j CD -i CT O -ST IT* * »*

o o u-» r- o^ cr r- N*oNO^oaN

•a- r- co— CD —

• I •£ rg <£ ^ O lO<M <M N-OON' I Ofiir m n com * meomca

• 0000<r*f~ff'r«NO'0*\*Om-H(DCDCO 3 •••••••••••••••CC I O O O iT> C" —« O •

• r- r- r- r- r* r» i p»- p» r» r» r* r» r-

o i p» r» p* •T^trii^^^^^-o^r^r-r^r1

4 CO I J^£u-Z I -i ~t ~> 3 I

uj Z •

Z'eo i ^togm-*x(-cPta coo^o-^'Njp'>«'»r\«o

> D I

188

Page 201: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

<M O O © ©

a zSacuiu>>-o «ee za x

UJ oguvi

I in —o v> >J "" XUIU a nj i-OC ~ « ma - Ui tn o1 vi vio • z1 •> u<t ac ao z zzui ac » zo>- UJ VI 3*>o i-t- Z ac- < «•" o in< a Of O O Z <M»- « o_> VI — oOC X a uj — a. mOU OC SD 3 a ui i

a O » D o m/>- Ut- UI o — •2 Z * VI UJ u a o«« OutK O IS 1

ae»- KI3 o «l-O O « V> K _

_i zm z X -ru. _< «o_i UJ VI |oo UJ ** «- _J « —a Bin x ao —i- OO uj

z oUJ Z 0. o oX — > « X»- z a V Z 0.Of -> z

— WQ;O JO<«OU(h

1/1 1 Iw M — > UU 1 1 4 £ U. UJ <—

1 1 UJ -* U_ _J u.1-

1 i a> *t*-»

1 I •* < QC Z~—•

I I 2i-Qs:at i 1 UJ X —UJ 1 1 o o >• »- oh- i 1 <" j JiuO 1 i Z X — -J~< i 1

—1 «« -J -J

a: i i < u. o o a.< i i ac o a. a.r I

i a uj 3O ! 1 X O _J <S>

I t -J t- < <UJ 1 i < o at —

' crt- 1 i i-z ail- ujM | i Oiu >Zi/<</> 1 t- -J 4 ~ Z)

a aUI UJo I-

189

Page 202: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

3«m.o -a li.

a. 3 o^ im I

O i >- I— I OCX_l I </l < oO I O 1- t-i/> • zvtvt

s k- iu ao u. a i-

<o o u.a o u. ft- v>•r o o « ain o z at 3

3 3 Om »« 0C O Xi»

U. 1/1

u. uO X

• • izoe -»

IU vu»- 1-

i- ««1/1 i/l Z < OE

"• a 3t/i t/i « 3 O

ae a xXX»- 1-

_ik ae _io o < VIUL U. U. IU

Z Xae ae •- ooo 4 z

r-*©fwtA»*imf»«nr»>oo^'^ (M m Hftj«4

• 01i/ie>

p*i <-i CO GO O -* **OfV**»*

o«o«o«in«ons«4^OBrflHmNc* co -o ir» *(DON MOflffi^OC^^irO*• ••••••••••••ooooooooooooe

C0fMOr>J«, <r4-O<0<MCJ><0rMno* eocA mcA MO^ <amoe- ©f* o ^ o -» co *** <\i co co co

_oo — -i<n-« — — <r ooo

o-«im>o»»0'»o-»*««mo>NaNAmNOM^mHOCONNO^nil'IIMlO O O O —> — ©oo — o oo

— oooo^o — omooo

000-.-.-1000-1000

l«4IMIAMU>nf NMO«

• cu go co co eo co 00

>4{MA«l^«MOO> © »* OJ C*1

X VIuuuZ X —MUD— Z 3— uo — —

a. ae oeiu iuo

ZC.O.Uo o— z z ae>- a o <« — — x_) 1- t-u3 < «l/lX -1-1 —— 3 DO1/1 X X

«"»"l/>01/11/10z «--COJae z z o3 - — tna ae ae3 3-J

-1 o o -a

_i >-< u. u. OU. u. U. h-too— Z ZUl«s 3 SOoe oe oe

190

Page 203: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

Ot • •••••*••••••X • ^#CIN00Nm40NH«

I —* .*> (M « 0^ (C (O-J • o -^ <© <o r- o o\ I 00 -O tA O <^ fM >T

* c- M O r*\ o>c*> <-v> o» «*

*M*- ^T *\» h tr\

X I OlMl-"«00-«ff"'lo.«-»«M-• co <£> at - o*r-iM.-*m — .©

OOIMOOOO-"—OOOOV I

O IAt •

<t\ jj r-

o- if mO O —

CO I OOO—lOOOOOOOOO <D I oooooooooooooi-ir-cOK-JjiMgriMC**— it. im rf\oooimooooo — oooooooooooooooo

O I IMff- O« I O Oxu I o ooVWt I • • •

a i o o o

• Hi-0 o » •• r- r» m ru co

-j • o » ** o <r

«n cui

O •» r

> <M IM• r» en* CC IMt CO UN

o*285

X • r- o co o- o .

< cr> it. •* m un <

. i mo**> i •»

t

I f*- *M O l*N O <

' i NN«ie«im>s <e «o <o <

t/i i • • • • •

CO I £0 ff- o ^ I* *

_) I —<M m CO <M

) cor-* co f*

<o«

J IT <0n0 C

» u\ m

— r-f>. —

<M «M

O 4>l«r <m •

CM -ooooo

• e>N»NO>NOC9 4>tfV*7NO-J i «Mmc0fnmr-*T Ffc «f^r*f* — ff*V I mc-^-OK-.-tf^.c.riMUNiM.*19 I •••••••••••••X i nocnnNXcvo<o«x

I ^om"l««ir#tfO*ff• im r- -. Hi^in •* •*

i irok o, ***o**r*co»-'0^I -c aj <M r- r- m — y*> -r .0 0* <M u*.

I omm9>IAON«NO«ON

-r© — «— r~JjWNiM— -#i*-©

iOO— mo— — oi

i i ff o<o, ck ^MO>me«Hs ^i i o»-"0<»i»o>if>eo»ri»r<""*

i/ii .............COl ooooooooooooo

I IE f- fl-IC - OJ I m o «>. i o «g •»

O I • • •

At I o o o

3 I •» im mJ I O <M «M/ I o o oml • • •

CD I OO O

• i/N-oceomo-oo-o-erx-xM0>om««>Mnf on«xg• r-oifiinr-r-h-^rmo—ip-tf%000*08)9>hX«MON«• 4r<r>««9CMmiricoo*3>rMir><o

I xin —i — <m «

• «r<Oino«roiMiMrMCr'ir'*-«*n«'O0t O0l NN'MSir>Nr"irt

Ml .............co » ##irO'MNi,'nh>mfl>«<c

• t**o^-o-«>oa'^^r*-'Oco<wi <o-"-r'*>oi*»-««Vff»m*vj<^«^i oocr«x)r*ooo'0-'U^'N*o -J• -^«>iojo-«m«^«>'»0^*Ot*»r* x.

»A O• — cr.n-eix*Nisor-ii>~rn'--«r w* Xi ot^r***. «^ O flD «-• fs* •—• UJ

ol ct• r-o^'"'i>'MfiNr-«tti7--^ o• c-cNrnffMflj^/iv/fsjm^ -1• ooM*-*i^os 'CV'r»'Ot^m X

u v*> (Sjt/>^00^'-H'M-^U^f^r.—.1^*1 V (C

I .*oi*icDOCrr*tr>«dcD<c>«n4)i KjcoK.^\.*f—^r.**icriw>iocoI INN«ls*tfiO'- im i*N I*- O —

r>N — iM—r-OaDO-Or^'MCOiM

i oan• «r> mp>

_l I IM IP. u%V I O ~ *

> o • • • •L X I O O O

< OOOI PIMIAM

i m m *n •o * im »

i nj>n« «»>*»-.eo-p--Ji xr*r-moox o-«mmr.iri^VI fM«rcr^<rf\icofMrrtoiw«r»<M'oi e^Mit^flmtfNtf^^ONX

I «»«»«lf\0««-"»O>CO«M• * in r- -. un *• o -r 0* -r coI * eg CN HA4 -4 im

• Oi^O^««OClOX^O• OffiMff#UMT-0^*Oif»I N(M^*^-IM«3* — #N^I K.PH-C0CO47K.COQ0rri4>—inc]

—it o i*» C** un r» ff un i

V I IM f-o O — -> l"N I

OI **CD«<6**OmiI ocoI r> Oi O -0

• OOlMOOOOO —OOOO

I o»«_l I «• m Oo » c5 r»

i ii\nf«o«i-o«on«4i ii\*o«'C>'H-«Ktrfi<-o'a)N• •*<rr-«ifi — *i>«ob*M I .............

as I e«ieo-m'-#«-«io«

• mo--OK-iM — no- — — f~*ri •v.»o-»^e»'co«rcoo*r».»| 0*4rtOO>M^B)tftm4««

lfl# 0*0*1^M r- r» o «o oo m o

m <o

OOoo

UN —oo

IM O<m te\— oo o

cocoo »oo

~ I x*(V • "Iff. <3

I ff. #JI«VI I • • •CO I o — —_l I

> • t*- p. r- r» r* f* i

2 1 ifimc>«*ffc '*#a)OiMN(oI — IM IM IM IM — — IM IM IM IM

o«»-r~r-r~<ccococoaDeOco

I

« I (IKIO'MONxc.itOIMNCO • M <M IM IM fM — — (M IM IM fw

s:• tf>4>r»rter»r".coco0apcoao<D

•- uj I

X at I -«ivm*KiH5i»ooo>o«iMiiimil _, — __.In i ""«Mi»i«r.r>»8*-e00'O»"i<Mi"iUJ X • -.«.«.«> 3 I

uj Z I

>- aj

uj X I •»« ""•"> 3 •

uj Z I

191

Page 204: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

I 004NQ>«>«0 <0

I oooooooooo« oooooooooo

*oooo»«»»o ooooooooooooooooooooo

X* «-©o~mmooo-tOi ••••••••••

/v X I oooooooooo

oo«, 'Nu">r,*>oir«'im

oooooooooo• •••••••••oooooooooo

I w — * J «• •»

.J I ff^OOffiNXI OOOOMNAO t ••••••

XXI oooooo3 I

«• I

X IO I

a. • -" <m m r- j- -oX I n«ooo«U I o o o o oovw t •••••SI oooooo

-I I

o o

~ 0>rg OO O

<M ftl

IN -<O -«

eg o-oooo

• « in in o .

j I co cp* in r- tVI m m eo co <u • oj s « -<<X

I ON-OI

i IN COI » —> r» ga

• I XCIOIPi in ir\ r~ -*

«ii • • • •CO I iPhOh

<D 0* i

o -«

Oi ^^^•cocoocococo<o

a •hw I

2 <B I 4rtft*9r'-«oe>0**<Nmmil — — -> —> 3 I

UIZ I

192

Page 205: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

APPENDIX H

FLOW, TOTAL RAIN AND DRY DAYS SCALLERGRAM FOR TYPE II SITES

Scatter plots are presented in this appendix to:

1. Show the tendency of the Nashville dry day and rainfall

data to cluster.

2. Show why the Nashville data tended to skew the Type II

equation for predicting runoff volume with total rain anddry days since the last storm event.

The scatter plots in this appendix (Figures H-l to H-k) present all

log transformed data using log scales on both the X-axis and Y-axis.Data points on each graph are represented by the letter "A" for

single data points and by the letter "B" if two values fall on the

same data point. These scatter plots were produced using thescatter plot option of the Statistical Analysis System Program (SAS)

during regression analyses of monitored data.

Figure H-1 shows the scatter plot of Nashville dry day and flow data.

The data form two distinct clusters. One cluster forms around the

X-axis and represents the numerous data points for rainfall eventswhich occur after no dry days. The second cluster which appears in

the center of the plot represents rainfall events occurring after a

dry day period. This scatter plot shows the atypical rainfall patternof Nashville as compared to the Milwaukee and Denver sites. At

Nashville a dry period consisting of 5 to 17 dry days was normallyfollowed by a rain period lasting 3 to 6 days. Data collected at theMilwaukee and Denver sites did not consistently exhibit theseextended rainfall periods.

Figure H-2 which plots the Nashville rain and flow data shows a strongrelationship between these two parameters. Figure H-3 also displays a

strong relationship when these same two parameters are plotted for

the combined Milwaukee Hwy. 45 and Denver data. However, when thedata from all three sites is plotted (Figure H-k) , the strong relation-ship observed on the previous two plots is lost due to a skewingof the data to the lower portion of the scatter.

The scatter plot analyses explain, at least partially, why thesignificance of a Type II equation predicting runoff volume from total

rainfall and dry days decreased when the Nashville data was combinedwith the Milwaukee Hwy. k$ and Denver data.

193

Page 206: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

• a— s

<0

-o

5O

c(D

>.(D

-o

>•l_

-o

o-3-

I

0)

oQ.

i_

O

CO

J3<s on. ax*- ,a « >- w ii-2ou _i « i/> >- i « — z

19^

Page 207: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

2O

T3Cro

c03

f04-1

o

OI

*/> •—>

in

o

MO

CMI

J_

en

O O O u. t- O t- ' X « — Z » — 2 hJJIUH

195

Page 208: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

< <

< <r

LACMI

1_

a)>c

o-oc<0

LTV-3"

a:

i

<D

M O

- § o

ocTO

I a — 2 » — z -zuiujm

2O

4-*

O

uCO

COI

a:

<uj_

3

196

Page 209: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

-acfU

in-3-

<t B <l

< <

< < <4 • <

< <

<l «I

sa:

Z3

2

oI

01

roz<ux: •

4-> i/i

OJS_ 4-1

O -—M- in

C LA•— CnJ

ra 1

i_ —, i_

ro <D4-J >

c4-> Q)Q•acru

2O

oQ.

4->

4-1

f0

OCO

-3"

1

ZJ

D1

1 « — 2 » -" Z xiJIallA

197*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1981 726-524/1384 1-3

Page 210: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

o"t o fFJ

•n -n C 33) -i 3 :n >2 3 rf X ->

3 o -* i-1- — V)

5 o >-h n- 1

-1 — O •

n \ CD > J>11

3) 3 -£* 0J2 — r+

§2 m 33?-n »o o •

_ >-h

O OD nnO i

IT -u— o

i-"'

^Q^r

2.

1

jj -C^

1 1

CO1

OO7*

n>70 m

Page 211: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

FEDERALLY COORDINATED PROGRAM (FCP) OF HIGHWAYRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The Offices of Research and Development (R&D) of

the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are

responsible for a broad program of staff and contract

research and development and a Federal-aid

program, conducted by or through the State highway

transportation agencies, that includes the Highway

Planning and Research (HP&R) program and the

National Cooperative Highway Research Program

(NCHRP) managed by the Transportation Research

Board. The FCP is a carefully selected group of proj-

ects that uses research and development resources to

obtain timely solutions to urgent national highway

engineering problems.*

The diagonal double stripe on the cover of this report

represents a highway and is color-coded to identify

the FCP category that the report falls under. A red

stripe is used for category 1, dark blue for category 2,

light blue for category 3, brown for category 4, gray

for category 5, green for categories 6 and 7, and an

orange stripe identifies category 0.

FCP Category Descriptions

1. Improved Highway Design and Operation

for Safety

Safety R&D addresses problems associated with

the responsibilities of the FHWA under the

Highway Safety Act and includes investigation of

appropriate design standards, roadside hardware,

signing, and physical and scientific data for the

formulation of improved safety regulations.

2. Reduction of Traffic Congestion, andImproved Operational Efficiency

Traffic R&D is concerned with increasing the

operational efficiency of existing highways by

advancing technology, by improving designs for

existing as well as new facilities, and by balancing

the demand-capacity relationship through traffic

management techniques such as bus and carpool

preferential treatment, motorist information, and

rerouting of traffic.

3. Environmental Considerations in HighwayDesign, Location, Construction, and Opera-

tion

Environmental R&D is directed toward identify-

ing and evaluating highway elements that affect

• The complete seven-volume official statement of the FCP is available from

the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. 22161. Single

copies of the introductory volume are available without charge from Program

Analysis (HRD-3), Offices of Research and Development, Federal Highway

Administration, Washington, D.C. 20590.

the quality of the human environment. The goals

are reduction of adverse highway and traffic

impacts, and protection and enhancement of the

environment.

4. Improved Materials Utilization andDurability

Materials R&D is concerned with expanding the

knowledge and technology of materials properties,

using available natural materials, improving struc-

tural foundation materials, recycling highway

materials, converting industrial wastes into useful

highway products, developing extender or

substitute materials for those in short supply, and

developing more rapid and reliable testing

procedures. The goals are lower highway con-

struction costs and extended maintenance-free

operation.

5. Improved Design to Reduce Costs, Extend

Life Expectancy, and Insure Structural

Safety

Structural R&D is concerned with furthering the

latest technological advances in structural and

hydraulic designs, fabrication processes, and

construction techniques to provide safe, efficient

highways at reasonable costs.

6. Improved Technology for HighwayConstruction

This category is concerned with the research,

development, and implementation of highway

construction technology to increase productivity,

reduce energy consumption, conserve dwindling

resources, and reduce costs while improving the

quality and methods of construction.

7. Improved Technology for HighwayMaintenance

This category addresses problems in preserving

the Nation's highways and includes activities in

physical maintenance, traffic services, manage-

ment, and equipment. The goal is to maximize

operational efficiency and safety to the traveling

public while conserving resources.

0. Other New Studies

This category, not included in the seven-volume

official statement of the FCP, is concerned with

HP&R and NCHRP studies not specifically related

to FCP projects. These studies involve R&Dsupport of other FHWA program office research.

Page 212: Constituents of highway runoff - Archive

DDDS7Dfl