Consequences for Eskom of the Listed Activities under Section 21 of the National

Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004

Submission to the Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs

7 May 2013

In support of

Overview

• In general, Eskom supports the Listed Activities published in terms of section 21 of the National Air Quality Management: Air Quality Act, 2004, and the proposed amendments

• Eskom is committed to reducing emissions from power generation activities, and is busy with an extensive retrofit programme to achieve emission reductions.

• However, full compliance with the Minimum Emission Standards for Listed Activities will have significant implications for energy security, the electricity tariff and resource consumption in South Africa.

• We would like to request that the Minimum Emission Standards for Listed Activities be amended.

2

In support of

Emission reduction: particulates

3

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

198

2

198

3

198

4

198

5

198

6

198

7

198

8

198

9

199

0

199

1

199

2

199

3

199

4

199

5

199

6

199

7

199

8

199

9

200

0

200

1

200

2

200

3

200

4

200

5

200

5/0

6

200

6/0

7

200

7/0

8

200

8/0

9

200

9/1

0

201

0/1

1

201

1/1

2

201

2/1

3

201

3/1

4

201

4/1

5

201

5/1

6

201

6/1

7

201

7/1

8

201

8/1

9

201

9/2

0

Re

lati

ve p

art

icu

late

em

iss

ion

s k

g/M

Wh

se

nt

ou

t

Colenso, Klip, Umgeni, Hexriver, Vaal, Vierfontein, Westbank & Wilge OUT

DUVHA IN

MATLA IN

COMPLETION OF 5 YEAR ENHANCEMENT INVESTIGATION

START DECOMMISIONING SIMUNYE

KRIEL SO3 IN

TUTUKA & LETHABO IN

CAMDEN, GROOTVLEI, KOMATI, INGAGANE, SALT RIVER OUT

MATIMBA IN

KENDAL IN

DUVHA U1-3 BAGGED

HENDRINA 6-10 BAGGED

ARNOT 1,2 & 3 UNITS BAGGED

ARNOT 4-6 BAGGED FILTERS

MAJUBA IN

KENDAL SO3 IN

DUVHA 4-6 SO3 IN

LETHABO SO3 IN

HENDRINA 1- 5 BAGGED

HENDRINA SO3 IN

MATLA SO3 IN

MATIMBA SO3 IN

KRIEL, MATLA SO3 PLANT REFURBS

Relative Particulate Emissions Roadmap

GROOTVLEI BAGGING

MEDUPI IN

TUTUKA BAGGING

KRIEL, LETHABO, MATLA BAGGING

KUSILE IN

Future

At risk due to funding constraints

In support of

Planned emission reduction: NOx and SO2

4

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Rel

ativ

e S

O2

emis

sion

s (k

g/M

WhS

O)

Year ending

Kusile FGD

Medupi FGD

Kendal FGD

Oxides of nitrogen Sulphur dioxide

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Rel

ativ

e N

Ox

emis

sion

s (k

g/M

WhS

O)

Year ending

Kriel Low NOx Burners

Medupi Low NOx Burners

Kusile Low NOx Burners

Tutuka Low NOx Burners

Majuba Low NOx Burners

Matla Low NOx Burners

In support of

Compliance with ambient air quality standards

• Particulate (ash) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from Eskom’s power stations do not result in non-compliance with ambient air quality standards

• There is only non-compliance with sulphur dioxide (SO2) standards in non-populated areas (indicated in orange below)

5

Air quality monitoring shows

compliance in Kriel town

In support of

Typical resource requirements and waste production for compliance for a 3600 MW power station

6

Capital costs: R25-28.5 billion

Water: 3-6 million m3/annum

Sorbent: >400 000 tons/annum

Operating costs:

>R300 million/annum

INPUTS OUTPUTS

Reduced SO2, NOx &

particulate emissions

Additional CO2:

~165 000 tons/annum

FGD by-product:~675 000 tons/annum

Outage requirements: Up to 150 days per unit

In support of

Recommendations

• The Minimum Emission Standards should be amended as follows:

• a grandfathering clause, allowing older plant to operate under more lenient limits, needs to be included.

• the ability to use offset projects to improve air quality in populated areas and much more effectively reduce human exposure to poor air quality

• more lenient compliance timeframes are required.

• the 48-hour period allowed for start-up in the Minimum Emission Standards needs to be increased for cold starts after long outages

7

In support of

Motivation for requested amendments

• Investing in more emission abatement technologies at Eskom power stations will not solve the air quality challenges faced in South Africa. The largest air quality problem in South Africa is poor indoor air quality in low income areas, caused by domestic coal and wood combustion. Eskom is committed to air quality offset projects that will minimise domestic combustion emissions in order to improve the quality of air in populated areas.

• The retrofits will require an increase in the electricity tariff

• The emission abatement technologies have negative environmental impacts such as resource requirements and waste products

8

In support of

Conclusion

• Eskom is committed to continued improvement in environmental performance and would like to work with Government and all stakeholders in achieving this objectives.

• Unfortunately, full compliance with the Minimum Emission Standards is not possible without severely compromising energy and water security. Should the Minimum Emission Standards not be amended, Eskom will need to be granted an exemption from compliance in many instances.

• Eskom continues with preparations for fabric filter plant retrofits to reduce particulate emissions, and with preparations for de-NOx and de-SOx retrofits at selected stations.

9

In support of 04/19/2310

Thank you