connecting the dots: technology & coordinated …...connecting the dots: technology &...
TRANSCRIPT
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to
Enhance your PIT Ana Rausch
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Cities that Fit into Houston & ETJ Comparison
From: Knudson,LP www.knudsonlp.com
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Houstonia Feb 2016
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Coordinated Access Houston Highlights
Access Points
• 12 Hubs
• Shelters, drop-in centers, ministries
• Outreach Teams dedicated to CA
• Call-in option
Assessments
• Match to PSH or RRH
• Consent is electronic
• Vulnerability tools prioritize populations
• Navigators
• 13184 clients assessed
HMIS
• All matching
• Bed availability
• PSH & RRH Waitlist prioritization
• Referral outcomes
• 1200 to PSH
• 1003 to RRH
As of 4/12/17
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
CA Fact Sheet
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
• On January 29, 2015, there were 4,609 people experiencing homeless in Houston/Harris County – 1,950 (42%) staying in a place not meant for human habitation
– 2,659 (58%) staying in emergency shelters or transitional housing
– 14% decrease compared to 2014
– 46% decrease compared to 2011
• Increase in number in PSH – 140% since 2011
• Approximately 1 in 7 identified as chronically homeless
• Only 3 chronically homeless families identified
• 2 in 5 had substance abuse problems
• 2 in 5 had mental health issues
• 1 in 8 was a veteran
Homeless in Houston (2015 PIT)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
• Surface teams
• Specialized outreach teams
• Shelter count using HMIS
• Next day interviews to determine make-up
of population
2011-2015 PIT: Ways we counted
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Why the shift?
• August & September 2015
• 11 Houston City Council Districts
– Wanted info regarding panhandlers
• Homeless Engagement Initiative (mini PIT)
– Outreach Teams & Volunteers
– 622 Individuals Engaged
• 58 were Veterans
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Homeless Engagement Initiative
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Yes No Undefined
440
80 102
Homeless
Yes No Undefined
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Homeless Engagement Initiative
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Yes Likely No
180
98
344
Chronic
Yes Likely No
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Homeless Engagement Initiative
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
SSI/SSD, Other
Panhandling, Job
Job
Panhandling, Other
Panhandling, SSI/SSD
Other
Job
SSI/SSD
Null
Panhandling
2
4
7
13
24
24
33
64
194
253
Income
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
34
58
44
44 17
117
49
72 42 45 20
Numbers for Houston City Council Districts
Homeless Engagement Initiative
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
What we found
• Decrease in homeless numbers of 46%
since 2011 made switch more manageable
– Individuals were engaged and not just counted
• Concern about null values
– Paper forms hard to decipher & sometimes
damaged
– Took too long
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Methodology:
• Request for a 3 day count was submitted to HUD &
approved in November 2015
• Count occurred January 26-28, during the day
• Shelter count remained the same and official “night of
the count” was January 25, 2016
• No more counting from vehicles.
Changes in the 2016 PIT
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Methodology:
• New survey tool was developed
– Incorporated aspects of the Coordinated Access
assessment & the Youth Count Texas survey
– Attempts were made to interview ALL persons who
appeared to be experiencing homelessness
– Any person identified during interview as being
chronically homeless, a veteran, or youth (18-24) was
assessed for housing using CA on the spot
Changes in the 2016 PIT (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Methodology:
• Paper tool vs technology
– Decision was made to conduct survey electronically
• Previous years’ surveys hard to transcribe
• Change in methodology required interviews to move faster
• Weather could play a factor (leading to wet forms)
– Survey tool was placed on an app on tablets
• GIS location automatically recorded (reverse geocoding for
zip codes)
Changes in the 2016 PIT (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Survey Tool The Way Home Point-in-Time Survey (Youth + Adults)
Track 2: Survey completed
Has another volunteer asked you the same questions on either January 24th or 25th? (if yes then stop interview)
1. What is your name?
2. What is your DOB? Month: _ _ Day: _ _ Year: _ _ _ _
3. Do you identify as? a.□ Male b.□ Female c.□ Transgender: M to F d.□ Transgender: F to M e. □ None or Other f. □ Refused
4. Are you a legal US Resident?
a.□ Yes b.□ No If no then what country are you a citizen of? _____________
5. Where did you sleep on the night of Monday, January 23rd?
a. □ Street/Sidewalk b. □ Bridge/overpass c. □ Bus or train station/Airport d. □ Woods, park, or outdoor encampment e. □ Abandoned building f. □ Vehicle g. □ Refused h. □ Other _______________
i. □ Emergency shelter j. □ Hotel or motel paid for with voucher from a church or social services agency k. □ Transitional housing l. □ Domestic violence shelter/Safe haven m. □ Hotel or motel paid with own funds n. □ Staying with family or friends o. □ Couch surfing p. □ Mental health facility q. □ Substance abuse treatment center r. □ Corrections facility (including juvenile) s. □ Hospital t. □ Foster home or group home u. □ Permanent supportive housing v. □ Subsidized housing (Sec 8, VASH, etc.) w. □ Own home or apartment
If any option from 2h – v is selected, then interview stops unless it’s a youth (under 24).
6. Is the individual currently panhandling? (do not ask, observational only)
a.□ Yes b.□ No
7. What part of town do you normally sleep in? a.□ Downtown b.□ Midtown c.□ Near Northside d.□ near NRG e.□ Galleria f.□ Other g.□ Don’t know h.□ Refused
8. Where did you become homeless? a.□ Houston b.□ Pasadena c.□ Conroe d.□ Harris County (outside city limits) e.□ Fort Bend County f.□ Montgomery County g.□ None of these h.□ Don’t know i.□ Refused
9. Including today, how many times have you been in an emergency shelter and/or on the streets in the past 3 years (since January 2014)?
a. □ first time b. □ 2-3 times c.□ 4 or more times
d. □ Don’t know/Refused
10. Including today, how many months have you been in an emergency shelter and/or on the streets in the past 3 years? (since January 2014)
a. □ less than 12 months
b. □ 12 or more months
c.□ Don’t know/Refused
11A. Do you have any of the following health conditions? (check all that applies)
a. Alcohol abuse or addiction f. HIV/AIDS b. Other substance abuse g. Mental illness c. Developmental disability h. Physical disability d. Traumatic brain injury i.□ Don’t know j.□ Refused e. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
11B. Do any of these keep you from holding a job?
a.□ Yes b.□ No c.□ Don’t know d.□ Refused
Hello, my name is and I’m a volunteer with the Coalition for the Homeless. We are conducting a survey to count homeless people in order to provide better programs and services. Your participation is voluntary and your responses to questions will not be shared with anyone outside of our team. I need to read each question all the way through. Can I have about 10 minutes of your time?
Can the survey be completed? Yes (proceed with track 2) No (proceed with track 1)
Track 1: Survey not completed
Why? a.□ Client refused b.□ Not safe c.□ Not homeless/pandhandling
1. Age Range (observe) a.□ under 18 b.□ 18-24 c.□ 25-34 d. □ 35-44 e.□ 45-54 f.□ 55-60 g.□ 65+
2. Gender (observe) a.□ Male b.□ Female c.□ Transgender: M to F d.□ Transgender: F to M e. □ None or Other f. □ Refused
3. Race (observe) a.□ White b.□ Asian c.□ American Indian or Alaskan Native d.□ Black/A.A. e.□ Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander f.□ Mixed g. □ Don’t know h. □ Refused
4. Is individual currently panhandling? (observe)
a.□ Yes b.□ No
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Recruiting Volunteers
• Surveyors
– CoC Housing Providers
• MOUs implemented during NOFA
• Needed more provider participation
– All Coordinated Access Staff Members
– Specialized Outreach Teams
– Service Providers
– Veteran’s Administration
• Non-Surveyors
– Schools/Student Groups
– Faith-based community
– Public Officials
– Homeless & formerly homeless clients
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Training
• 150 surveyors
• 4 training dates
– 3 surveyor specific trainings
• tablet use
• log-ins
• practice
– 1 community volunteers
• Overview of the count
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Mapping:
• Jurisdiction was divided into 3 areas:
– Inner 610 loop (first day)
– West of the loop (second day)
– East of the loop (third day)
– Map assistance from local provider (Key Map)
– Maps in each key map square were subdivided
Days of the Count
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Days of the Count (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Staging Areas: – 4-5 each day
– Coalition staff
– Centrally located in each divided area as a meeting place
– Maps, tablets, supplies distributed
Teams:
• Approximately 56 teams each day
– 4 people per team
Days of the Count (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Driver:
• Drive teams safely around the map area assigned & find parking
(community volunteers)
• Also walked the assigned area with the other team members
Navigator:
• Used the map(s) to help the driver navigate around the assigned
search areas
• Kept track of and marked those areas on the map which have been
searched (community volunteers)
Spotter: • Looked for homeless persons on the streets
• Could also be a surveyor
Days of the Count (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Surveyor: • Completed the survey form on the tablets (service provider)
• Some teams had more than one depending on location
Coordinated Access Assessor:
• Some teams had a Coordinated Access trained Assessor
• These Assessors were placed on teams going to known hot spots
• Assessors conducted housing assessments with targeted
populations:
– Veterans
– Chronically homeless (based on survey responses)
– Youth ages 18-24
Days of the Count (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
• Assessments were observed online in real time
• Each staging area was observed separately
• App had option to complete entire assessment
or observe only (not safe or client refused)
• Exact longitude & latitude was captured for each
survey
• Results (reports) were shown immediately
• No transcribing from paper needed
New Technology
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Technology (cont.)
Data can be used to identify “hot spots”
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Technology (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Technology (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
New Technology (cont.)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
• 3,626 persons experiencing homeless were counted
1,050 (29%) staying place not meant for human habitation
2,576 (71%) staying in emergency shelters, transitional housing, or
safe haven that evening.
• Expanded definition* - 5,726 individuals
• 2016 PIT count represents:
21% decrease compared to 2015
58% decrease compared to 2011
• Increase in number in permanent housing
161% since 2011
• Significant percent have mental health and/or substance
abuse issues *Expanded definition includes unsheltered, those in ES, TH, safe haven and those in jail who were homeless
before incarceration (Catherine L. Troisi, Ph.D., UTHealth School of Public Health)
Results
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Sheltered
Unsheltered
Total 8,538
Total 7,356
Total 6,359
Total 5,351
Total 4,609
Total 3,626
Results (cont.)
(Catherine L. Troisi, Ph.D., UTHealth School of Public Health)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Sheltered Harris Co, 2513
Sheltered, Ft. Bend Co, 63
Unsheltered Ft. Bend Co, 4
Unsheltered Harris Co, 1046
2016 PIT – Geographic area
(Catherine L. Troisi, Ph.D., UTHealth School of Public Health)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
18-24 years 6%
25-34 years 13%
35-44 years 24%
45-54 years 30%
>55 years 27%
<18 years 0%
(Catherine L. Troisi, Ph.D., UTHealth School of Public Health)
Age Group (Unsheltered)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Sheltered
Unsheltered
Total population
* only those in ES or unsheltere * Adults only
Subpopulations 2016
(Catherine L. Troisi, Ph.D., UTHealth School of Public Health)
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
• On 25 January 2016, there were 3,626 people
experiencing homelessness in Houston/Harris County.
• ~1 in 5 identified as chronically homeless
• No unsheltered and 2 sheltered chronically homeless
families identified
• ~1 in 3 had substance abuse problems
• ~2 in 7 had mental health issues
• ~1 in 6 was a veteran; lower than expected
Houston 2016 PIT
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Connecting the Dots: Technology &
Coordinated Assessment to Enhance your PIT
Ana Rausch
Thank You!!
The Coalition for the Homeless leads in the development, advocacy, and coordination of community strategies to
prevent and end homelessness.
The Way Home is the collaborative model to prevent and end homelessness in Houston, Harris, Fort Bend, &
Montgomery Counties. For more information visit www.thewayhomehouston.org
Ana Rausch 832-531-6005