conjugacy in thompson’s group jim belk (joint with francesco matucci)

57
Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Conjugacy inThompson’s Group

Jim Belk

(joint with Francesco Matucci)

Page 2: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Thompson’s Group

Thompson’s Group .

2

½

1

(¼,½)

(½,¾)

Piecewise-linear homeomorphisms of .

if and only if:

1. The slopes of are powers of 2, and

2. The breakpoints of have dyadic rational coordinates.

Page 3: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Thompson’s Group .

2

½

1

(¼,½)

(½,¾) if and only if:

1. The slopes of are powers of 2, and

2. The breakpoints of have dyadic rational coordinates.

10 ½

¼

0 1½ ¾

Page 4: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 5: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 6: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 7: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 8: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 9: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 10: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

Page 11: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Another Example

In general, a dyadic subdivision is any subdivision of obtained by repeatedly cutting intervals in half.

Every element of maps linearly between the intervals of two dyadic subdivisions.

Page 12: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 13: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand DiagramsWe represent elements of using strand diagrams:

10 ½

¼

0 1½ ¾

Page 14: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A strand diagram takes a number (expressed in binary) as input, and outputs .

Page 15: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A strand diagram takes a number (expressed in binary) as input, and outputs .

Page 16: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A strand diagram takes a number (expressed in binary) as input, and outputs .

Page 17: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A strand diagram takes a number (expressed in binary) as input, and outputs .

Page 18: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A strand diagram takes a number (expressed in binary) as input, and outputs .

Page 19: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A strand diagram takes a number (expressed in binary) as input, and outputs .

Page 20: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Every vertex (other than the top and the bottom) is either a split or a merge:

split merge

Page 21: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A split removes the first digit of a binary expansion:

merge

Page 22: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

A merge inserts a new digit:

Page 23: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

10 ½

¼

0 1½ ¾

Page 24: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

10 ½

¼

0 1½ ¾

Page 25: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

10 ½

¼

0 1½ ¾

Page 26: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

10 ½

¼

0 1½ ¾

Page 27: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 28: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 29: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 30: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 31: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 32: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 33: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Strand Diagrams

Page 34: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Reduction

Type I

Type II

These two moves are called

reductions.

Neither affects the corresponding

piecewise-linear function.

Page 35: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Reduction

Type I

Type II

These two moves are called

reductions.

Neither affects the corresponding

piecewise-linear function.

Page 36: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Reduction

Type I

Type II

These two moves are called

reductions.

Neither affects the corresponding

piecewise-linear function.

Page 37: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Reduction

Type I

Type II

These two moves are called

reductions.

Neither affects the corresponding

piecewise-linear function.

Page 38: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Reduction

Type I

Type II

These two moves are called

reductions.

Neither affects the corresponding

piecewise-linear function.

Page 39: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Reduction

Type I

Type II

A strand diagram is reduced

if it is not subject to any

reductions.

Theorem. There is a one-to-one

correspondence:

reducedstrand

diagrams

elements of

Page 40: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

MultiplicationWe can multiply two strand diagrams concatenating them:

Page 41: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

MultiplicationUsually the result will not be reduced.

Page 42: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

MultiplicationUsually the result will not be reduced.

Page 43: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

MultiplicationUsually the result will not be reduced.

Page 44: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Conjugacy

Page 45: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Conjugacy Problem

A solution to the conjugacy problem in is an algorithm which

decides whether given elements are conjugate:

Let be any group.

Classical Algorithm Problems:

• Word Problem

• Conjugacy Problem

• Isomorphism Problem

Page 46: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Free GroupHere’s a solution to the conjugacy problem in the free group .

Suppose we are given a reduced word:

To find the conjugacy class, make the word into a circle and reduce:

Page 47: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Free Group

To find the conjugacy class, make the word into a circle and reduce:

Two elements of are conjugate if and only if they have the

same reduced circle.

Page 48: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 49: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 50: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 51: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 52: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 53: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 54: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 55: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

The Solution for The idea is to wrap the strand diagram around in a circle:

We call this an annular strand diagram.

Page 56: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Main ResultTheorem. Two elements of are conjugate if and only if they

have the same reduced annular strand diagram.

Page 57: Conjugacy in Thompson’s Group Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)

Main ResultTheorem (B and Matucci). Two elements of are conjugate if

and only if they have the same reduced annular strand diagram.

Hopcroft and Wong (1974): You can determine whether two

planar graphs are isomorphic in linear time.

Corollary. The conjugacy problem in has a linear-time solution.

By analyzing the structure of the annular strand diagram, one can

get a complete description of the dynamics of an element of .