conflicts of interest related parties … · charity • can lead to conflicts of interest or...
TRANSCRIPT
The problem…
• Charity Trustees naturally bring with them to their
position connections which can be of benefit to the
charity
• Can lead to conflicts of interest or loyalty
Why is this an issue?
• Trustees have a legal duty to act only in the best
interest of the charity
• Decisions not being made in the Charity’s best
interest
• Reputational damage
• Can be invalid or open to challenge
• Conflicts of interest are not a problem providing they
are correctly and transparently addressed
Why is this an issue?
• Charity Commission see many cases of charities
getting into difficulty because conflicts of interest
were not addressed or were handled incorrectly
• Important to have in place robust systems
Who does this apply to?
• Trustees
• Senior management
• Someone able to engage charity in significant
financial transactions
IDENTIFY
• A conflict of interest is any situation in which a
trustee’s personal interests or loyalties could, or
could be seen to, prevent the trustee from making a
decision only in the best interests of the charity.
• There is a conflict of interest where there is a
proposed transaction between the charity and a
connected person of a trustee or senior person in the
organisation. Similarly, there is a conflict of interest
where there is a benefit or a potential benefit to a
connected person
PREVENT
• Remove conflict of interest by not pursuing that
action, undertaking it differently, not appointing
trustee/trustee resignation
• Conflict of loyalty – e.g. potential new trustee who is
a trustee or is connected with another organisation
operating in the same field / competing for funds etc.
PREVENT
• Follow law/governing document in respect of
managing conflict
• In absence of governing document/legal provisions:
– require conflicted trustees to declare their interest at an
early stage and, in most cases, withdraw from relevant
meetings, discussions, decision making and votes
– consider updating their governing document to include
provisions for dealing with conflicts of interest
PREVENT
• Exceptionally, need to seek the authority of the
Commission where the conflict of interest is so acute
or extensive that following these options will not
allow the trustees to demonstrate that they have
acted in the best interests of the charity
PREVENT
• Conflicts of interest often arise because a decision
involves a potential trustee benefit.
• Trustee benefit must be properly authorised and the
trustees must follow any conditions attached to the
authority which say how the conflict of interest
should be handled (legal requirements)
RECORD
• Trustees should formally record any conflicts of
interest and how they were handled and must, if
they prepare accruals accounts, disclose any trustee
benefits in the charity’s accounts
Examples of benefits to trustees
• Sell, loan or lease charity assets to a charity trustee
• acquire, borrow or lease assets from a trustee for the charity
• Pay a trustee for carrying out their trustee role
• Pay a trustee for carrying out a separate paid post within the charity, even if that trustee has recently resigned as a trustee
• Pay a trustee for carrying out a separate paid post as a director or employee of the charity’s subsidiary trading company
• Pay a trustee, or a person or company closely connected to a trustee, for providing a service to the charity. This covers anything that would be regarded as a service and includes legal, accountancy or consultancy services through to painting or decorating the charity’s premises, or any other maintenance work
• employ a trustee’s spouse or other close relative at the charity (or at the charity’s subsidiary trading company)
• Make a grant to a service user trustee, or a service user who is a close relative of a trustee
• Allow a service user trustee to influence service provision to their exclusive advantage
Good practice
• Include provisions in governing document to deal
with conflicts of interest
• Conflicts of interest policy and register of interests
• Ensuring that meetings include an item to declare
potential conflicts at the start and have it minuted
• Transparency – public availability of register
• Pre-appointment issue for new trustees
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION
• A related party transaction is a financial transaction
between the related party and the charity. A related
party transaction involves the transfer of assets or
liabilities or the performance of services by, to or for
a related party
• As auditors we have a duty to undertake work to
identify such transactions
Donations from trustees
• Trustees may also give to the charity. Donations
which are unrestricted do not have to be separately
disclosed. However, if the trustee specified how the
funds had to be used, then this may be exerting
significant influence and so restricted donations by
trustees do have to be disclosed.
Charity Commission Guidance
• https://www.gov.uk/government/publications
/conflicts-of-interest-a-guide-for-charity-
trustees-cc29/conflicts-of-interest-a-guide-for-
charity-trustees
The Charity Commission's new regulatory approach - are you informed?
Steve LawHead of Investigations TeamCharity Commission for England and Wales
Charity seminar
HW Fisher & Company
11 November 2014
The Charity Commission
The independent regulator of charities in England and Wales
Five statutory objectives (s14 CA 2011)
• The compliance objective – promoting compliance by charity trustees with their legal obligations
Commission’s functions (s15 (1)(3) CA 2011)
• Identifying and investigating apparent misconduct or mismanagement in the administration of charities
• taking remedial or protective action
Facts about charity
164,000 – registered charities
4,968 – new registrations in 2013-14
3.4 million – regular volunteers
1m – charity trustees
940,000 – charity workers
> £64bn – annual income of registered charities
£106bn – long term investments held by charities
Upholding public trust in charity
Commission’s work to uphold public trust • our strategic approach
• how we are improving already
• plans for the months ahead
Charities’ role in promoting public trust • what the public expects of you
• what we expect of you
Context for charity regulation
Changing public expectations of charity• Demands for greater accountability
• Evidence of public giving charities less ‘benefit of doubt’
• Media focus on charities (e.g. pay, investments)
Increased external scrutiny of Commission• National Audit Office review of Commission’s work
• Public Accounts Committee hearings
• Debates in Parliament
Significant cuts to Commission funding• CC budget 2013-14 - £21.4m
• CC budget 2007-8 - £31.7m
• = c. 50% real terms cut since 2007
New £8m funding• To invest in technology and frontline operations
Our new strategic approach
One of our most important statutory objectives is to increase public trust and confidence in charities.
“by concentrating on promoting compliance by charity trustees with their legal obligations,
by enhancing the rigour with which we hold
charities accountable, and by ensuring that we
uphold the definition of charity under charity
law” (Statement of regulatory approach, Commission’s Annual report and
accounts 2013/2014)
Robust regulation in action
• 64 – charities placed under inquiry
(15 in 2012-13)
• 540 – use of legal powers in investigative work
(216 in 2012-13)
• Regulatory alerts – e.g. recent alert on reporting
serious incidents.
More proactive approach
Operations / registrations
• New operations monitoring team
• 318 referrals, including 89 from registrations (between October 2013 & April 2014)
Accounts monitoring
• Casework related and themed accounts reviews
• 1,664 sets of accounts reviewed
Smarter, more focused guidance
• Clearer focus on expectations of trustees
• E.g. new Conflicts of Interest guidance
Greater transparency
Greater openness about statutory inquiries
• announcing inquiries when its in the public interest
• marking open inquiries against charities’ online entry
Reports of operational cases
New online charity search tool
• more information about charities
• easier to access from mobile devices
What we need to do now…
Risk • Better use of data
• Targeting work where it makes greatest impact
• Supporting increasingly proactive approach to case work
Digitisation • Digitising front-end services
• Streamlining low risk customer-facing services = recognising
charities are our customers
Structure • Recruiting 5-strong senior management team
• Skills and talent management agenda
Show integrity
Have trustees:
• acted within their powers?
• acted in good faith and only in interests of charity?
• adequately informed themselves?
• taken into account all relevant factors, disregarded
irrelevant factors?
• managed conflicts of interest?
• made decisions within range of decisions that
reasonable trustee body would make?
Be accountable
It is important that charities provide the public with information about how they spend their money
How accountable are charities?
86% charities filed annual returns on time
86% charities filed annual accounts on time
99% of sector income accounted for
= over all compliance is high… but:
58 charities have been subject to double
defaulters class inquiry
£47m of charitable funds now accounted for
Report serious incidents
1,280 serious incidents reported in 2013-14
> 580 reports so far this year
= huge underreporting by charities
Serious incidents include:
• fraud, theft, significant loss
• abuse of beneficiaries
• financial links to banned group
• Investigation by another regulator
= actual or suspected
Mismanagement in the Administration of a Charity
Practical Examples of when an Interim
Manager had been appointed and the actions
that might be taken
BRIAN JOHNSON
� Busy people with good intentions and good causes
� Rapid growth and the need for time and skills resource
� Resource deficiency leading to shortcuts
� Leading to:
– governance failings;
– risk management short-comings;
– Late filing of statutory documents; and
– Value for money reduction.
Mismanagement in the Administration of a Charity
36
Mismanagement in the Administration of a Charity
� Practical examples of governance failings
– charity acting outside of its constitution;
– proper meetings not being held;
– conflicts of interests;
• Trading subsidiaries
– acting reasonably;
– trustee remuneration; and
– Statutory documents not being
filed on time.
37
Mismanagement in the Administration of a Charity
� Practical examples of risk management failings
– Entering into agreements without professional advice;
– Failing to keep a risk register;
– Controls, cash and fraud;
– Brand management;
– Trading and losses;
– Ensuring proper security is in place;
– Restricted funds;
– Insuring activities properly; and
– Ensuring the charity is meeting its
objects.
38
Mismanagement in the Administration of a Charity
� Examples of when value for monetary considerations have
been neglected:
– Not tendering properly;
– Not reviewing on-going contracts;
– Tax and corporate structures;
– Effective advertising and brand maintenance;
– All costs incurred are in pursuance of the
charity’s objects; and
– Capital expenditure and infrastructure
programs are kept under control.
39
Mismanagement in the Administration of a Charity
� Professional advice;
– Auditors;
– Corporate structures and SPVs;
– Tax;
– Legal support;
• Employment;
• Health & Safety;
• Environment;
• Contractual and fundraising; and
– Charity Commission guidance
40