# computational fracture mechanics anderson’s book, third ed., chap 12

Post on 21-Dec-2015

214 views

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

- Slide 1
- Computational Fracture Mechanics Andersons book, third ed., chap 12
- Slide 2
- Energy domain integral method: - Formulated by Shih et al. (1986): - Generalized definition of the J- integral (nonlinear materials, thermal strain, dynamic effects). - Relatively simple to implement numerically, very efficient. Elements of Theory Finite element (FE) code ABAQUS version 6.5 CF Shih, B. Moran and T. Nakamura, Energy release rate along a three-dimensional crack front in a thermally stressed body, International Journal of Fracture 30 (1986), pp. 79-102 ABAQUS: - suite of powerful engineering simulation programs - based on the finite element method - for simple linear analyses and most challenging nonlinear simulations
- Slide 3
- Abaqus 6.5 : creates input files (.inp) that will be processed by Abaqus standard. products associated with Abaqus: For details see the Getting Started Manual of Abaqus 6.5 can be used for producing/ importing the geometry to be analyzed. is useful to monitor/control the analysis jobs and display the results (Viewer). Abaqus Standard : general-purpose analysis product that can treat a wide range of problems. CAE : interactive, graphical environment allowing models to be created quickly. Optional capabilities (offshore structures, design sensitivity calculations) Abaqus Explicit : intended for modeling brief, transient dynamic events (impact) uses an explicit dynamic finite element formulation.
- Slide 4
- In 2D, under quasistatic conditions, J may be expressed by and, The contour surrounds the crack tip. The limit indicates that shrinks onto the crack tip. For details see the Theory Manual of Abaqus 6.5, section 2.16 n : unit outward normal to q : unit vector in the virtual crack extension direction. w : strain energy density displacement gradient tensor x 1, x 2 Cartesian system Energy Domain Integral : H : Eshelbys elastic energy-momentum tensor (for a non-linear elastic solid) : Cauchy stress tensor
- Slide 5
- With q along x 1 and the field quantities expressed in Cartesian components, i.e. The expression of J (see eq. 6.45) is recovered In indexed form, we obtain Thus, with The previous equation is not suitable for a numerical analysis of J. Transformation into a domain integral
- Slide 6
- Following Shih et al. (1986), is a sufficiently smooth weighting function in the domain A. m = -n on A includes the crack-tip region as m : outward normal on the closed contour Note that, A : the surface traction on the crack faces. with (*)
- Slide 7
- since Derivation of the integral expression 0 since (*) Noting that, = 0 = q Line integral along the closed contour enclosing the region A.
- Slide 8
- Using the divergence theorem, the contour integral is converted into the domain integral Under certain circumstances, H is divergence free, i.e. indicates the path independence of the J-integral. In the general case of thermo-mechanical loading and with body forces and crack face tractions: the J-integral is only defined by the limiting contour or Introducing then the vector, in A Using next the relationship, Contributions due to crack face tractions.
- Slide 9
- - This integral is evaluated using ring elements surrounding the crack tip. - Different contours are created: In Abaqus: First contour (1) = elements directly connected to crack-tip nodes. The second contour (2) are elements sharing nodes with the first, etc 8-node quadratic plane strain element (CPE8) 1 2 Refined mesh Contour (i) Crack nodes outside nodes inside Exception: on midside nodes (if they exist) in the outer ring of elements
- Slide 10
- J-integral in three dimensions Local orthogonal Cartesian coordinates at the point s on the crack front: Point-wise value J defined in the x 1 - x 2 plane crack front at s For a virtual crack advance (s) in the plane of a 3D crack, L : length of the crack front under consideration. : surface element on a vanishingly small tubular surface enclosing the crack front along the length L. L T
- Slide 11
- Numerical application (bi-material interface): x y Material 1 Material 2 b a 2h and h/b = 1 a = 40 mm b = 100 mm h = 100 mm SEN specimen geometry (see annex III.1): Material 1: a/b = 0.4 MPa. Remote loading: Materials properties (Youngs modulus, Poissons ratio): Plane strain conditions. E 1 = 3 GPa 1 = 0.35 Material 2:E 2 = 70 GPa 2 = 0.2
- Slide 12
- Typical mesh: Material 1= Material 2 Refined mesh around the crack tip Number of elements used: 1376 Type: CPE8 (plane strain) Material 1 Material 2
- Slide 13
- Simulation of the stress evolution (isotropic case)
- Slide 14
- Simulation of the stress evolution (bi-material)
- Slide 15
- IsotropicBi-material KIKI K II KIKI Annex III 0.7460.// Abaqus 0.7480.0.7520.072 Results: Material 1Material 2Bi-material J (N/mm) Abaqus 0.16410.00770.0837 SIF given in (*) same values on the contours 2-8 for the isotropic case (i =1,2). Ones checks that: (*)
- Slide 16
- - For an interfacial crack between two dissimilar isotropic materials (plane strain), where and Relationship between J and the SIFs for the bi-material configuration: plane strain, i = 1,2 H. Gao, M.Abbudi and D.M. Barnett, Interfacial Crack-tip fields in anisotropic elastic solids thermally stressed body, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 40 (1992), pp. 393-416 - Extracted from the Theory Manual of Abaqus 6.5, section 2.16.2. Disagreement with the results of Smelser et al. K I and K II are defined here from a complex intensity factor, such that with

Recommended

Affinis Fracture Affinis Fracture ?· Fracture and Affinis Fracture Inverse, has been developed. The…