comprehensive reporting
DESCRIPTION
Comprehensive Reporting The Comprehensive Securitization Audit Report was created in order to serve the various purposes of securitization audit – from seeking the most favorable terms in a loan modification to supporting legal action to delay or defend against foreclosure or to seek relief from unfair or unlawful practices by lenders, servicers, and related institutions. This report is different because it includes a section that discusses the contemplated profit that was to be made by the participants from securitizing a loan. The figures used in the computations are gathered from actual documents. It also states how soon the lender recovered the full amount it originally lent to the borrower instead of the 30 years it usually takes for the loan to be fully paid from the agreed monthly amortizations. The Comprehensive Audit Report was conceptualized to be what a real audit should be – independent and unbiased, with the auditor or examiner free of any interest in its outcome. It neither attempts to sensationalize its findings nor ignore the present economic ramifications of the crash of the housing market that securitization helped to unfold.TRANSCRIPT
presents
TheCOMPREHENSIVE
SECURITIZATION AUDIT REPORT
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TheCOMPREHENSIVE
SECURITIZATION AUDIT REPORT
The Comprehensive Securitization Audit Report was created in order to serve the various purposes of securitization audit – from seeking the most favorable terms in a loan modification to supporting legal action to delay or defend against foreclosure or to seek relief from unfair or unlawful practices by lenders, servicers, and related institutions.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TheCOMPREHENSIVE
SECURITIZATION AUDIT REPORT
This report is different because it includes a section that discusses the contemplated profit that was to be made by the participants from securitizing a loan. The figures used in the computations are gathered from actual documents. It also states how soon the lender recovered the full amount it originally lent to the borrower instead of the 30 years it usually takes for the loan to be fully paid from the agreed monthly amortizations.
TheCOMPREHENSIVE
SECURITIZATION AUDIT REPORT
This presentation discusses the features of the Comprehensive Securitization Audit Report. It is rendered highly credible with the use of irrefutable evidence gathered from very reliable sources supported with expert independent opinion and analyzed and presented in a highly professional manner. The examiners have no interest in the outcome of the examination.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TheCOMPREHENSIVE
SECURITIZATION AUDIT REPORT
The findings in this type of examination are factual although they are provided for informational purposes only and are not to be construed as legal advice. The borrower shall be strongly advised to consult a competent legal professional in connection with the contents of this report and its proper use.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The Documents Presented for Examination
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
This section lists the documents that are presented in the examination sorted, arranged, and labelled as exhibits. The exhibit numbers are cited throughout the report where necessary.
The usual order is as follows: Promissory Note, Security Instrument, Voluntary Liens Report or Title Report, MERS servicer inquiry screenshot, assignments, foreclosure documents, loan statements, and various correspondence.
Loan Granting, Execution of Deed, & Servicing
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
This section establishes the existence of the debt and the underlying security as agreed upon and acknowledged by the parties based on the documents that were presented, identifies the mortgaged property, and determines the terms and conditions that are relevant to the overall purpose of this examination.
Loan Granting, Execution of Deed, & Servicing
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The procedures involve a review of the promissory note and mortgage in order to verify if the note had been endorsed and if the mortgage had been recorded, to determine if MERS is a party or not and if it is, to ascertain what rights has been bestowed upon it, to identify the current servicer, and to inquire into the present status of the originating lender.
The following slides present a run-through of the typical transactions that give rise to the debt and the security.
Loan Granting, Execution of Deed, & Servicing
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
MERS
The Borrowerexecutes the Noteand the Mortgage
Borrower
to the Lender.
Note
In more than half of instances like thesethe Mortgage has a third party.
That party is MERS.
If MERS is a party it is namedas Nominee for the Lender and Mortgagee.
Lender
Mortgage
Mortgage
See section on The Role of MERS.
Loan Granting, Execution of Deed, & Servicing
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Borrower NoteMortgage
The Lender may service the loan itself
The Servicer collects the payments from the Borrower on behalf of the Lender.or may engage the
services of a Servicer.
Lender
Servicer
The Borrower is informed of any change of the Servicer.
Securitization
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
This section determines if the subject loan has been securitized and if it was, it identifies the securitizing entity and the parties thereto, verifies if the required chains of endorsements of the note and assignments of the mortgage have been fully complied, assesses the effect of securitization on the subject loan, determines its present status as a securitized loan, and identifies the entity who has possession of the loan and security instruments.
Securitization
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The procedures involve a search of the exact securitization trust, a verification of the documents on file with the SEC that establishes its identity and existence, an identification of the participating entities, a determination of the stated size of its loan pool and certificates issued as well as the rules and procedures governing its operations and whether or not these have been implemented as far as the examined loan is concerned.
The following slides present a brief background of securitization in general, a run-through of the typical flow of transactions, and a discussion of the most common violations.
Securitization in General
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Loan POOL
Securitization involves the accumulation of loans from one or more lenders into a loan pool.
LoanLoanLoanLoanLoan
Trust organizers not only sourced loans from their own affiliates and correspondents; they also acted as warehouse lenders, buying loans from small independent lenders.
The MERS System shortcut documentation and even bypassed recording requirements thus helping to speed up the whole process.
There could be as many as 10,000 loans in one pool alone amounting to as much as $4 billion or more. Loans were sourced in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.
Thousands of trusts were established between 2001 and 2007.
Securitization in General
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The loans are used to guarantee the certificates that are sold to the investing public.
LoanLoanLoanLoanPOOL
The certificates are issued in classes corresponding to the types of loans in the pool.
The first securitizers were the GSEs Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae.
Loan
In the United States private-label securitizations are managed by trusts.
Next came private lenders which securitized loans that did not qualify for funding by the GSEs. These are called private-label securitizations.
The proceeds from the sale of the certificates are used to buy the loans from the lenders.
CERTIFICATESCERTIFICATES TRUSTPOOL
Securitization in General
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TRUST
LoanLoanLoanLoanPOOL
CERTIFICATESCERTIFICATES
Collections on the loans are used to buy back the certificates and pay for their interest over a period of time according to their scheduled redemption dates.
Class A
Class B
Class C
Class D
Class E
The certificates are issued in tranches. Each tranche has a scheduled redemption period. The first tranches are given priority over the others.
Trust Organization
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TRUST
The process of pooling loans begins with the Originator which might be the lender or the entity that acquired the loan from another lender.
The Originator sells the loan to the Seller.
DEPOSITOR
SELLER
ORIGINATOR
The Seller sells the loan to the Depositor.
The Depositor the sells the loan to the Trust.
Trust Organization
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
DEPOSITOR
SELLER
ORIGINATOR
The Trustee performs fiduciary functions for the Trust.
The Custodian keeps the assets and records of the Trust.
CUSTODIAN
TRUST SERVICER
The Servicer services the loans on behalf of the Trust.
TRUSTEE
Trust Organization
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
DEPOSITOR
SELLER
ORIGINATOR
Usually the Originator, Seller, Depositor, Servicer, and even the Custodian are affiliated companies. Only the Trustee is independent.
CUSTODIAN
TRUST SERVICER
TRUSTEE
In the Countrywide model, Countrywide Home Loans is the originator and seller, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing is the servicer, CWABS, Inc. is the depositor, and The Bank of New York is the Trustee and Custodian.
Transfer of the Loan to the Trust
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The Note is supposed to be endorsed by the Originator to the Seller,
The Mortgage is supposed to be assigned following the same route.
In most securitizations however, no such chains of endorsements and assignments take place.
by the Seller to the Depositor,and by the Depositor to the Trustee.
TRUSTEE
ORIGINATOR
SELLER
DEPOSITOR
Transfer of the Loan to the Trust
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
In most securitizations, the Note would remain unendorsed
SELLER
DEPOSITOR
or endorsed only to the Seller.
The Mortgage would also remain unassigned
TRUSTEE
ORIGINATOR MERS
If MERS is a party in the Mortgage, it would execute the assignment as nominee for the lender. This assignment is voidable.
or assigned by the Originator directly to the Trustee.
Transfer of the Loan to the Trust
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
These chains of endorsements and assignments are required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement of the Trust
TRUSTEE
MERS
and must also be complied within 90 days of the Trust’s closing date in order to qualify the Trust as a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit, which is exempt from tax.
ORIGINATOR
SELLER
DEPOSITOR
Transfer of the Loan to the Trust
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TRUSTEE
MERSORIGINATOR
SELLER
DEPOSITOR
More often, what we see are an endorsement of the Note by the Originator to the Sellerand an assignment of the Mortgage to the Trustee by the Originatoror by MERS.
From the diagram at left it would seem that the loan was never validly transferred to the trust at alland worse, the transactions have caused the mortgage to be separated from the note.
See section on The Chainof Title.
Profit on the Securitized Loan
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
This section determines, albeit in theoretical terms, the potential income that the securitizing entity will have derived from the securitization of the subject loan as well as the period of time it will have taken for the originating lender to recover from the securitization trust the amount it loaned to the borrower from the proceeds of the sale of the certificates.
Profit on the Securitized Loan
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
For profitability, the procedures include determining how much interest the borrower is paying on the loan, into what group the loan belongs, and the interest that the trust is paying on the certificates that are secured by the loans in that group.
For recovery, the procedures include determining when the trust started to distribute payments to its certificate holders and if all of the certificates guaranteed by the loans in that group has been sold.
The following slides present a brief demonstration of how the procedures are applied in the examination.
Profit on the Securitized Loan
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
LOANS CERTIFICATES
The Trust may pay interest at 5% p.a. on the certificates
As has been discussed, the Trust
The Trust pays Interest on the Certificates but earns more Interest on the Loans.
Thus the Trust stands to earn a Gross Income of 2% p.a.
and uses it to guarantee the issuance of Certificates.
creates a pool of Loans
but earns Interest at 7% p.a. on the Loans.
TRUST
Profit on the Securitized Loan
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
LOANS CERTIFICATES
If the Trust spends $5,000 a year for servicing, trustee fees, and other expenses, it still earns a Net Income of $5,000 a year for every $500,000 loan that has been securitized.
Given these rates, the Trust earns Interest of $35,000 a year for every $500,000 loan that has been securitized.
On the other hand, the Trust pays Interest of $25,000 a year for every $500,000 worth of Certificates, leaving a Gross Income of $10,000.
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
TRUST
Profit on the Securitized Loan
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
LOANS CERTIFICATES
$5,000
$15,000
X 3
TRUST
In the previous example, it has been estimated that the Trust stood to earn a Tax-Free Net Income of $5,000 a year for every $500,000 of loan that has been securitized.
This means that if the securitization process was repeated three times, the Trust will have earned $15,000 for every $500,000 of loans that have been securitized.
It is reported that the total loans securitized as of the end of the year 2010 is $3 trillion.
$15,000 out of $500,000 may be a small amount but it was earned without using capital.
Recovery of the Loaned Amount
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The loan is granted in Month 1,
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4
This layered timeline shows the speed and frequency in which a loan Originator can recover through the Trust the amount it loaned to the Borrower thereby making the funds available for fresh lending. The process is repeated twice more in this timeline.
MONTH 5
MONTH 9
MONTH 6
MONTH 10
MONTH 7
MONTH 11
MONTH 8
MONTH 12
and is securitized in Month 3. The certificates are sold in one month and the loaned amount
is fully recovered in Month 4.
A new Loan is granted in Month 5,
and is securitized in Month 7. The certificates are sold in one month and the loaned amount
and is securitized in Month 11. The certificates are sold in one month and the loaned amount
is fully recovered in Month 8.
A new Loan is granted in Month 9,
is fully recovered in Month 12.
Recovery of the Loaned Amount
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4
This timeline shows that during a period of one year, the whole Lending-Securitization-Recovery cycle can be repeated three times and the Lender will still be able to lend again at the start of Month 1 of the following year.
MONTH 5
MONTH 9
MONTH 6
MONTH 10
MONTH 7
MONTH 11
MONTH 8
MONTH 12
Following the assumption on the previous slides, this is the same $500,000 being recycled over and over again. It also proves that the period it takes to securitize $500,000 to earn $15,000 per annum is one year – without the need of capital.
Securitizers like Countrywide, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, IndyMac, and Washington Mutual established well within or over 50 securitization trusts a year during the years 2001 and 2007.
Summary – Profitability & Recovery
LOANS
To summarize, the Trust creates an asset base made up of a pool of loans.
In order to pay for these loans the Trust borrows money by issuing certificates.
In short, what the Trust owns. . .
TRUST
. . . it owes.
Or it owns nothing. . . . . . and owes nothing.
CERTIFICATES
Yet the Trust stands to earn $5,000 a year for every $500,000 being securitized only oncewhile providing the Lender with another $500,000 in fresh funds for new lending within a span of four months.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Summary – Profitability & Recovery
1 $500,000 4% $20,000 $1,000,000 1% $10,000
2 $500,000 4% $40,000 $2,500,000 1% $35,000
3 $500,000 4% $60,000 $4,000,000 1% $75,000
4 $500,000 4% $80,000 $5,500,000 1% $130,000
5 $500,000 4% $100,000 $7,000,000 1% $200,000
6 $500,000 4% $120,000 $8,500,000 1% $285,000
7 $500,000 4% $140,000 $10,000,000 1% $385,000
The table below compares a non-securitized $500,000 loan (Column 2) earning a net income of 4% p.a. Its Average Daily Balance (ADB) will be steady and its yearly income (Column 4) will accumulate at a uniform rate. Column 5 is the ADB of a $500,000 loan securitized three times a year. Its assumed net income is only 1% p.a. Column 7 shows its accumulated income. Row 7 compares their accumulated net incomes at the end of the seventh year.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
MERS as Nominee
This section applies if Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) is a party in the debt and/or the security instruments. It aims to determine what authority or capacity has been granted to MERS and by whom, and if MERS did perform any act under that capacity, to determine if this act was performed in accordance with law and the terms and conditions under which they were bestowed.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
MERS as Nominee
The procedures include a review of the security instrument in order to verify if MERS is a party and if it is, to define its authority, an inquiry on the MERS website to determine if the instrument is recorded in the MERS System, and an examination of the documents that pertain to acts that were executed by MERS as a party in the security instrument in order to ascertain if these were done in accordance with the terms of the instrument and with law and its implications on the other parties involved therein.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The MERS System
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
MERS
The MERS System has numerous lending institutions as members. MERS claims to hold legal title to their mortgages.
MemberMember
A member who assigns a note to another by way of an entry into the MERS database need not assign the mortgage.
MERS claims it has the authority to assign the mortgage to the holder of the note as reflected in the MERS database.
MemberMember MemberMemberMortgageNoteMember
The MERS System
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The MERS System has numerous lending institutions as members. MERS claims to hold legal title to their mortgages.
A member who assigns a note to another by way of an entry into the MERS database need not assign the mortgage.
MERS claims it has the authority to assign the mortgage to the holder of the note as reflected in the MERS database.
MemberMember MemberMemberMortgageNote
MERS
The Role of MERS
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The Lender holds the Note.
Mortgage
MERSMERS Database
Note Member
MERS holds the Mortgage.
Instead of endorsing the Note, the Lender enters in the MERS Database that the Note has been transferred.
Upon being notified of the Note’s transferMERS transfers the Mortgage to the transferee of the Note.
Lender
The Role of MERS
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
The entry by the Lender in the MERS database
Mortgage
MERS Database
Member
MERS’ authority to assign has already been contested.
it must have a corresponding endorsement of the Note by the Lender.
Lender
is not a valid endorsement.
MERSMERS
If at all the MERS assignment is to be considered valid
Note
See section on The Chain of Title
Robo-Signing
This section attempts to establish prima facie evidence that the persons who are signing on behalf of the entities who have executed acts involving the loan and security, the witnesses to their signing, as well as the notaries public before whom the instruments have been sworn to, have been involved in robo-signing or surrogate signing.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Robo-Signing
The procedures include a search for information on the signor’s reported involvement with robo-signing, the various purported capacities under which he/she is acting, and a comparison of his/her signature with available specimens. The current status of the notary public is also verified.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Robo-Signing
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Our main source for information on robo-signers is the Massachusetts Southern Essex Registry of Deeds.
Other sources include
ProTitleUSA
Timothy M Candless
A X Smith Law Home Preservation Network
Foreclosure Hamlet
No Foreclosure
Darrick Services
Free Foreclosure Lawyer & many more.
The statuses of notaries are verified with 123Notary.
Robo-Signing
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Our sources of specimens are WhatSignature.com and our own RS Database which we started compiling from actual examined documents in the year 2012.
A sample of our signature verification presentation runs as follows:
This is the signature of Bryan J. Bly on the subject assignment.
This is the signature of Bryan J. Bly on another assignment which he signed as Vice-President of CitiMortgage, Inc. on September 27, 2010 (from the Examiners’ RS Database; Bly B 01).
Chain of Title
This section aims to identify any breaks in the chain of title or instances wherein the security instrument has been separated from the debt instrument in relation to or as the result of the securitization of the loan, the capacity or lack thereof, of MERS to perform certain acts, and the nullity of the documents that have been signed by forgers or robo-signers or surrogate signers.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Chain of Title
The procedures involve the identification of the original parties in the loan and the security instruments and in the endorsements, the securitization, the assignments, and the substitutions of trustees and the comparison between the required transactions and the complied, and the matching of each assignment with a corresponding endorsement.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Chain of Title
A sample of a sequence of transactions runs as follows:
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Seq. No. Date Debt Instrument Security Instrument
1 May 10, 2007 Loan GrantingJames S. Johnson, BorrowerUnion Federal Mortgage Corp.Originating Lender
Execution of DeedJames S. Johnson, BorrowerUnion Federal Mortgage Corp.Originating LenderMERS, Nominee & Mortgagee
Transactions in light boxes are actual documented transactions. Those in dark boxes are the transactions required in securitization.
Continued
2 June 22, 2007 Endorsement, SecuritizationUnion Federal Mortgage Corp.as Originating Lender, EndorserCountrywide Home Loans, Inc. as Seller, Endorsee
Assignment, SecuritizationUnion Federal Mortgage Corp.as Originating Lender, AssignorCountrywide Home Loans, Inc. as Seller, Assignee
Chain of Title
A sample of a sequence of transactions runs as follows:
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Seq. No. Date Debt Instrument Security Instrument
3 June 22, 2007 Endorsement, SecuritizationCountrywide Home Loans, Inc. as Seller, EndorserCWABS, Inc. as Depositor Endorsee
Assignment, SecuritizationCountrywide Home Loans, Inc. as Seller, EndorserCWABS, Inc. as DepositorEndorsee
Transactions in light boxes are actual documented transactions. Those in dark boxes are the transactions required in securitization.
Continued
4 June 22, 2007 Endorsement, SecuritizationCWABS, Inc. as Depositor EndorserThe Bank of New York as Trustee Endorsee
Assignment, SecuritizationCWABS, Inc. as Depositor AssignorThe Bank of New York as Trustee Assignee
Chain of Title
A sample of a sequence of transactions runs as follows:
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Seq. No. Date Debt Instrument Security Instrument
5 Aug 29, 2011 Assignment of MortgageMERS as Nominee, AssignorThe Bank of New York as TrusteeAssignee
Transactions in light boxes are actual documented transactions. Those in dark boxes are the transactions required in securitization.
Continued
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
DEPOSITOR
SELLER
The foregoing sequence of transactions is analyzed and explained as follows:
TRUSTEE
Chain of Title
LENDER
1
2
3
4
MERS
1 The Note should have been endorsed by the Lender to the Seller, by the Seller to the Depositor, and by the Depositor to the Trustee.
2 In fact, however, the Note was not endorsed. Thus, the A-B-C-D sequence of endorsements was not complied at all.
3 MERS’ authority to assign the Mortgage as Nominee for the Lender is questionable. It may also have engaged the services of robo-signers is executing the assignment.
4 MERS did in fact, assign the Mortgage to the Trustee. Thus, the A-B-C-D sequence of assignments has been cut short to A-D.
The Mortgage should have been assigned in the same sequence. These chains may also be referred to as the A-B-C-D sequence.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
DEPOSITOR
SELLER
TRUSTEE
Chain of Title
LENDER
MERS
Based on the documents presented
and if the MERS assignment is rendered valid, then
the Mortgage has been separated from the Note.
and if the MERS assignment is rendered null and void, then
it appears that the loan was never transferred to the Trust at all.
MERS
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
DEPOSITOR
SELLER
TRUSTEE
Chain of Title
LENDER
MERS
Thus, whether or not the MERS assignment is valid, there is still no full compliance of the required chains of endorsements and assignments. This means that:
o The trust could not foreclose because it is not in possession of the Note and Mortgage or if it is, it does not have the documents to support the transfers.
o The trust would not qualify as a REMIC therefore its net income would not be tax exempt.
o The trust is not bankruptcy remote and is not a holder is due course.
Foreclosure
This section arranges the loan and security and foreclosure transactions in sequence, identifies the foreclosing party, and ascertains if this party has the authority to initiate the foreclosure based on the documents presented.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Foreclosure
The procedure centers on the flaws in the chain of title that may have arisen as a result of the failure to fully comply with the chains of endorsements and assignments required in securitization, the capacity of MERS to execute assignments, and evidence of robo-signing on the pertinent documents.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Foreclosure
The securitization trust Trustee, or any party initiating the foreclosure will have to prove that it has in its possession the Note and the Mortgage.
In the case of the Trustee, these instruments will have come to its possession through the A-B-C-D chains of endorsements and assignments and it must be able to show the documents evidencing their full and timely compliance.
It must be noted that a Note can be transferred only by endorsement and a Mortgage by assignment. All such transfers are bound by the higher legal principle that the Note always follows the Mortgage.
Note
Mortgage
TRUSTEE
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Foreclosure
Thus, particularly in the case of MERS, its assignment may be rendered valid only if the lender endorsed the Note to the same entity as the MERS assignee.
By concluding that the Trustee is not the proper party to initiate the foreclosure, it thus becomes necessary to identify who this party is.
Going back to the chain of title, the Note has not been endorsed. Therefore, regardless of who the holder of the Mortgage is by assignment, it is not the real party in interest.
Note
Mortgage
TRUSTEE
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
Foreclosure
The Mortgage may have been separated from the Note but the Note remains secured and the holder of the Mortgage cannot enforce its rights upon it without the Note.
Thus, in the instant case, the real party in interest is still the originating lender. This has to be admitted without prejudice to the evidence that the loan has been securitized.
The evidence for securitization, however, does not grant rights to the Trustee to initiate the foreclosure.
Mortgage
Note
TRUSTEE
Conclusion
The Comprehensive Audit Report was conceptualized to be what a real audit should be – independent and unbiased, with the auditor or examiner free of any interest in its outcome. It neither attempts to sensationalize its findings nor ignore the present economic ramifications of the crash of the housing market that securitization helped to unfold.
The examiners are aware that the homeowner has a purpose for engaging their services. As in any business environment, they are working under certain constraints with limited resources. These limitations may hamper them from getting to the bottom of things, but however these may affect their work, the examiners are only bound to make conclusions that are supported by facts and evidence.
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
TheCOMPREHENSIVE
SECURITIZATION AUDIT REPORT
www.mortgageauditsonline.com
a
Mortgage Audits Online, Inc.presentation
Created by Alan Petralba Copyright 2014