compliance automation the regulatory reporting challenge michael thomas ceo stb systems director,...
Post on 18-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Compliance Automation
The Regulatory Reporting Challenge
Michael ThomasCEO STB Systems
Director, Lombard Risk Management plce: [email protected]
t: +44 20 7384 5007
Excellence in regulatory reporting and financial crime detection
• The effect of Basel II on reporting institutions in the UK
• The parallel introduction of Integrated Regulatory Reporting
• Reporting for Standardised banks – data and other technology requirements
• Electronic reporting
• Creating a business benefit
• Anti money laundering & financial crime
Agenda
Compliance Automation
• UK listed software company focused solely on risk and compliance solutions
• The leading UK supplier of regulatory reporting solutions with more than 140 UK customers and more than 200 worldwide
• STB-Reporter already implemented for UK, Cayman Islands, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Luxembourg, Singapore, South Africa, USA
• Experts in this field since 1993, with more business professionals than programmers
Who we are
Compliance Automation
• Branches not regulated for CAR in UK have only small regulatory changes
• Small UK registered institutions likely to have small negative impact on CAR with basic or standard approaches – some more significant changes on the regulatory reporting side
•Larger institutions performing full reappraisal of use of capital against the risk profile of their business
• Increased focus on evaluation of risk and then its proper management
• Assess if there is a regulatory need or business benefit from adoption of advanced approaches
The effect of Basel II on reporting institutions in the UK
Compliance Automation
• Business benefit of advanced approach must be significant to justify cost of implementation and should not just be a straightforward capital calculation
• Assessment of data adequacy and systems requirements for advanced approaches
• Banks implementing advanced methodologies have purchased and implemented capital computation engines already at considerable cost
• Data cleansing and reconciliation of systems essential, but lead to greater confidence in enterprise management and risk control
The effect of Basel II on reporting institutions in the UK
Compliance Automation
• Established vendors of regulatory reporting products are supporting basic and standardised approaches, so limited incremental costs involved
• FSA and Bank of England very supportive of regulatory vendors and recognise the true value of automated processes in this area
• Minimises cost of implementation of Basel II regulatory reporting effects
• Significant cost of change limited to those implementing advanced approaches based on significant business benefits
The effect of Basel II on reporting institutions in the UK
Compliance Automation
• The IRR unifies reporting across all financial industry sectors based upon authorised lines of business
• Focus on data:
The parallel introduction of Integrated Regulated Reporting
Compliance Automation
The parallel introduction of Integrated Regulated Reporting
Compliance Automation
Data not forms
Data Set
Data Item
Data Element
• FSA assessing reporting requirements to minimise demands on smaller firms
• Consistency in common data and interpretation of definitions provides greater clarity to the market and more useful comparators for the regulator and the public
• Implementation alongside Basel II reduces the cost, but does increase risk due to big bang approach, although phasing introduced to counter this
• High concentration of automated reporting processes makes change achievable at more contained cost level
The parallel introduction of Integrated Regulatory Reporting
Compliance Automation
• Basel II impacts all firms, not just those implementing advanced approaches
• New Credit Risk requirement: more granular than before with individual weighting of assets
• Market Risk mainly affecting firms with trading books, otherwise mostly unchanged
•Operational Risk only implied under Basel I, but now an explicit requirement requiring much new data
Reporting for Standardised banks – data and other technology requirements
Compliance Automation
• Credit Risk & Operational Risk expand the data you need to capture:
• STATIC DATA:•Flags for CR Wholesale Approach (Standard, Foundation/Advanced IRB)•Flags for Counterparty CR Approach (CEM, SM, IMM)•Flags for CR Mitigation Approach (Standard, Haircuts, FIRB/AIRB)•Flags for CR Risk Retail Approach (Standard, AIRB)•Operational Risk method used•Wider Integrated Group waiver – much wider integrated group rules
• CUSTOMER DATA•Counterparty Credit Rating for standardised approach calculation
Reporting for Standardised banks – data and other technology requirements
Compliance Automation
• LOANS•Valuation of property for LTV purposes•Provision amount•Number of days overdue on a scheduled loan payment (largest value)•Rolling Bank Loan indicator•Arrears amount•Amount written off•Impairement charge•Impairement indicator
• FACILITIES•Days exceeded
• DERIVATIVES•Sovereign referenced interest rate indicator
Reporting for Standardised banks – data and other technology requirements
Compliance Automation
• REPOS•Core Market Participant indicator•Exposure Haircut indicator relating to the security•Settlement currency•Repo Margining period•Minimum Holding period
• GUARANTEES/COLLATERAL•Guarantor’s credit rating•Currency of collateral•Collateral Indicator (definition of existing field being expanded)•Collateral margining period•Minimum holding period•Own estimate haircut amount•VaR Model Collateral amount (if VaR Approach is used)
Reporting for Standardised banks – data and other technology requirements
Compliance Automation
• OPERATIONAL RISK DATA•Basic Indicator approach – net interest income (av. last 3 years*15%)•Basic Indicator approach – net non-interest income (av. Last 3 years*15%)•Flag for Standard Approach – business line code (or Bucket)•Standard Approach – business line name (av. last 3 years*bus. line%)•Standard Approach – net interest income (av. last 3 years*bus. line%)•Standard Approach – net non-interest income (av. last 3 years*bus. line%)
Reporting for Standardised banks – data and other technology requirements
Compliance Automation
• Mandatory Electronic Reporting (MER)
• Progressive introduction by industry sector alongside new reporting requirements
• Online – key into website• Offline – key into form & upload to MER• Web upload – create XML instance & upload to MER (no keying)• Direct Communication – secure file transfer of XML to FSA
Electronic Reporting
Compliance Automation
Electronic Reporting
Compliance Automation<
?xm
l ver
sio
n=
"1.0
" en
cod
ing
="u
tf-8
" ?
>
- <
!--
Taxon
om
y C
alc
ula
tion
Lin
ks lin
kb
ase b
ased
on
XB
RL s
tan
dard
Vers
ion
2.1
. C
reate
d b
y U
Bm
atr
ix A
uto
mato
r P
rofe
ssio
nal
Ed
itio
n 6
.20
3.1
52
2.2
88
44
. C
on
tact
ww
w.u
bm
atr
ix.c
om
Soft
ware
Cop
yri
gh
t (c
) 2
00
2-2
00
4 U
niv
ers
al B
usin
ess M
atr
ix L
LC
, A
ll
Rig
hts
Reserv
ed
Pro
du
ced
on
20
04
-03
-26
02
:01
:28
-
->
- <
linkb
ase
xmln
s="h
ttp
://w
ww
.xb
rl.o
rg/2
003/
linkb
ase"
xm
lns:
xsi=
"htt
p:/
/ww
w.w
3.o
rg/2
001/
XM
LS
chem
a-in
stan
ce"
xmln
s:xl
ink=
"htt
p:/
/ww
w.w
3.o
rg/1
999/
xlin
k" x
si:s
chem
aLo
cati
on
="h
ttp
://w
ww
.xb
rl.o
rg/2
003/
linkb
ase
htt
p:/
/ww
w.x
brl
.org
/200
3/xb
rl-
linkb
ase-
2003
-12-
31.x
sd">
<
role
Ref
xlin
k:ty
pe=
"sim
ple
" xl
ink:
hre
f="f
sa-c
om
p-v
0.1.
xsd
#Ro
w_T
ota
ls"
role
UR
I="w
ww
.fsa
.go
v.u
k/xb
rl/c
om
pla
ints
/Ro
w_T
ota
ls"
/>
<
role
Ref
xlin
k:ty
pe=
"sim
ple
" xl
ink:
hre
f="f
sa-c
om
p-v
0.1.
xsd
#Co
lum
ns_
To
tals
" ro
leU
RI=
"ww
w.f
sa.g
ov.
uk/
xbrl
/co
mp
lain
ts/C
olu
mn
s_T
ota
ls"
/>
- <
calc
ula
tio
nL
ink
xlin
k:ty
pe=
"ext
end
ed"
xlin
k:ro
le=
"ww
w.f
sa.g
ov.
uk/
xbrl
/co
mp
lain
ts/C
olu
mn
s_T
ota
ls">
<
loc
xlin
k:ty
pe=
"lo
cato
r" x
link:
hre
f="f
sa-c
om
p-v
0.1.
xsd
#fsa
-co
mp
_CR
1507
" xl
ink:
lab
el=
"fsa
-co
mp
_CR
1507
" />
<lo
c xl
ink:
typ
e="l
oca
tor"
xlin
k:h
ref=
"fsa
-co
mp
-v0.
1.xs
d#f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
03"
xlin
k:la
bel
="f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
03"
/>
<
calc
ula
tio
nA
rc x
link:
typ
e="a
rc"
xlin
k:ar
cro
le=
"htt
p:/
/ww
w.x
brl
.org
/200
3/ar
cro
le/s
um
mat
ion
-ite
m"
xlin
k:fr
om
="f
sa-
com
p_C
R15
07"
xlin
k:to
="f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
03"
ord
er=
"1"
wei
gh
t="1
" u
se=
"op
tio
nal
" />
<lo
c xl
ink:
typ
e="l
oca
tor"
xlin
k:h
ref=
"fsa
-co
mp
-v0.
1.xs
d#f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
17"
xlin
k:la
bel
="f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
17"
/>
<
calc
ula
tio
nA
rc x
link:
typ
e="a
rc"
xlin
k:ar
cro
le=
"htt
p:/
/ww
w.x
brl
.org
/200
3/ar
cro
le/s
um
mat
ion
-ite
m"
xlin
k:fr
om
="f
sa-
com
p_C
R15
07"
xlin
k:to
="f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
17"
ord
er=
"2"
wei
gh
t="1
" u
se=
"op
tio
nal
" />
<lo
c xl
ink:
typ
e="l
oca
tor"
xlin
k:h
ref=
"fsa
-co
mp
-v0.
1.xs
d#f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
31"
xlin
k:la
bel
="f
sa-c
om
p_C
R10
31"
/>
<
calc
ula
tio
nA
rc x
link:
typ
e="a
rc"
xlin
k:ar
cro
le=
"htt
p:/
/ww
w.x
brl
.org
/200
3/ar
cro
le/s
um
mat
ion
-ite
m"
xlin
k:fr
om
="
Electronic Output
• Automation of regulatory reporting processes:
• Ensures consistency to reporting• Introduces improved levels of control• Creates fully auditable results• Insulates operational systems from the regulatory computations• Creates a permanent on-line history• Minimises the impact of future regulatory change• Results in the creation of consolidated data model of financial and compliance data
Creating a business benefit
Compliance Automation
Compliance Automation
STB: Creating a business benefit
FXSybase
CustomersASCII/CSV
General LedgerSQL Server
Prices, Indicesetc
Rates, M2M…
DealsOracle
Accnt. BalanceAccess
STB-ReporterSTB-Super Consolidator
Any Data Sources Data acquisition & transformation Regulatory Reporting
Bank of England
Data Import
Scenario data
Reconciliations
Others..Exceptions
STB Data
Model Input
OtherApplications
Electronic
Other outputs
FSA Electronic
• Make use of consolidated data for other business purposes:
• Liquidity stress testing• Business decision support through scenario creation• Analyse historical data for trends and CRM purposes• Implement consistent head office reporting processes independently of the operational systems, which may differ in each location• Run regulatory processes daily and use regulatory data as part of risk management process• Build AML & Financial Crime database into the compliance data model•…
Creating a business benefit
Compliance Automation
• A major area of operational risk management
• Significant risk of fines, branch closure and reputational damage
• Compliance database can be used to manage financial crime risks
• Similar characteristics to regulatory applications – a need for consolidated data in a single data model with retention of history
• Important to get all relevant information drawn together in order to have a complete view on the compliance desktop
Anti money laundering & financial crime
Compliance Automation
• Cover as many areas as possible
• Customer Due Diligence
• Suspicious Activity Monitoring
• Watch List Monitoring
• Ability to perform historical investigations/searches of transactions and payments
• Link Analysis capability to find hidden relationships – vital for fraud investigations
• Centralised reporting to your local FIU
Anti money laundering & financial crime
Compliance Automation
• Good data management is key
• Ability to consolidate diverse data into a consistent view
• Complete end to end process, from source data to electronic delivery
• Auditability and proper access controls to regulatory and compliance solutions
• Full automation of processes is the only sensible way forward
The Regulatory Reporting Challenge
Compliance Automation
Compliance Automation
Thank you!
e: [email protected]: +44 20 7384 5007
Excellence in regulatory reporting and financial crime solutions