complexity and development in small island developing states
DESCRIPTION
Complexity and Development in Small Island Developing States. Duncan Green Oxfam GB Singapore, April 2014. ‘I think the next century will be the century of complexity’. Professor Stephen Hawking, 2000. This is what complexity looks like. Simple v Complicated v Complex. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Complexity and Development in Small Island Developing States
Duncan Green Oxfam GB
Singapore, April 2014
‘I think the next century will be the century of complexity’Professor Stephen Hawking, 2000
This is what complexity looks like
Simple v Complicated v Complex
What’s this got to do with Planning?
Some systems are more or less linear
But many are not
And SIDS are special (see Max Everest-Phillips paper) More vulnerable to shocks
– commodity prices – climate – lower diversity– Import dependence esp food
Short on skilled specialists Premium on leadership Denser networks (internally)
“…Small island developing States (SIDS) have their own peculiar
vulnerabilities and characteristics, so that the difficulties they face in the
pursuit of sustainable development are particularly severe and complex….”
UN Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform
Planning pros and cons
For Allocating $ Building common
goals and approaches
Evaluating performance against the plan
Accountability
Against Missing new
windows of opportunity
Weakens feedback loops to outside world
Delusions of control Leads to lying
An Adaptive Approach combines planning and improvisation Plan for capacity, improvise for response Enabling Environment Sensing Responding
Enabling Environment
Equip people to experiment and respond to events– Rights– Access to Information
Political Leadership– Compelling narrative– Norms and moral messaging– Steering through shocks
Building Resilience– Tackling ‘risk dumping’ and inequality– ‘Sowing diversity’
Sensing
Fast feedback– Consultative systems– Sentinel sites and Prairie Dogs
Positive Deviance– What good stuff is already happening?
Failing forwards Results for grown-ups (counting what
counts; put more L in your MEL)
Responding
Shocks as opportunities (red button system) Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation Hybrids and best fit, not cookie cutters Venture Capitalist multiple start-ups (e.g.
via trust funds) No regrets solutions
Trial and error and Rules of Thumb, not Best Practice and Analysis Paralysis
What Kinds of People are Needed?
‘We should move from being people who know the answers to people who know what questions to ask.’– Ben Ramalingam
Embeddedness as a virtue Beyond specialists (surfers and networkers)
– Convene others (including off-island)– Crowd sourcing– Encourage experimentation, learning and
adaptation
Who else is thinking along these lines? Thinking and Working Politically coalition USAID
– ‘10 Principles for Engaging Local Systems’ DFID
– Testing complexity tools in Nigeria and DRC Harvard Kennedy School
– Developing ‘Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation’ approaches
And Oxfam? ‘How Change Happens’ = core competency Understanding the system before you
intervene (power analysis, stakeholder mapping, history)
Increased focus on influencing, innovation and knowledge
Shocks as opportunities Resilience in climate change adaptation and
humanitarian response Results agenda: counting what counts
And Oxfam?Understand the system: Power
analysis
How might Change Happen?
Intervention: Select change
strategies
Implement, evaluate and
adapt
Thanks. And please stay in touch via Twitter (@fp2p) or the blog (http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/)