complexities of co-occurring disorders state agency perspective

16
Complexities of Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE June 24, 2004 Renata J. Henry, M.Ed.

Upload: nituna

Post on 21-Feb-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Complexities of Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE. June 24, 2004 Renata J. Henry, M.Ed. Mental Health Commissioners and Substance Abuse Directors would agree…. Need to improve services for people with co-occurring disorders. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Complexities of Co-occurring Disorders

STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

June 24, 2004Renata J. Henry, M.Ed.

Page 2: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Mental Health Commissioners and Substance Abuse Directors would agree…

Need to improve services for people with co-occurring disorders.

 

Definition of co-occurring has broadened to include other disabilities, physical health, and infectious disease.

 

Best approach is an integrated system both across disciplines and systems

Page 3: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Several conceptual models…

Dual-Diagnosis Capable and Dual Diagnosis Enhanced – ASAM

Dual-Diagnosis Integrated Treatment – Drake

Co-Occurring Disorders Matrix – NASADAD/NASMHPD

Page 4: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Service Coordination

Page 5: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Service CoordinationService Coordination by

Locus of Care

Page 6: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Barriers exist to truly integrated services and systems…..

Separate and uncoordinated State MH and SA systems

Little connection between providers and programs

Few staff bridges between programs Categorical funding streams Disparate insurance coverage

Page 7: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Barriers exist to truly integrated services and systems Cont…..

Differences in workforce

Limited research and evidence based practices

Lack of assessment and screening tools

Regulatory and licensing contradictions

Page 8: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

In Delaware……

Integrated administrative structure

Commitment by leadership

No wrong door approach

Moving away from silo funding toward blended funding

Minimum standard for the system is dual diagnosis capable

Page 9: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Training effort with MH and SA staff…

Interagency Program Development for Integrated Treatment Services Across Systems.

Focus on co-occurring MH, SA, and HIV MH, SA, Homeless, CJ, and HIV systems. Addresses all four quadrants with emphasis on II,

III, and IV Model includes: screening, assessment,

engagement, client readiness, phase and stage treatment, outcome measures and data collection.

Page 10: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Delaware’s System

Service Coordination by Program

Page 11: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Overcoming barriers……

Action needed at three levels:  Administration  Federal   Research

Page 12: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Administration…. 

Leadership at all levels is a necessary ingredient in the development and implementation of services

Establish the standard and sets expectations Leadership brings the players together and

initiates the dialogue. Leadership takes responsibility for dissemination

of tools and information to the field Develop methods to overcome funding and

regulatory barriers at various system levels

Page 13: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Federal……

Develop policies and methods that promote integration and collaboration.

Eliminate the funding barriers and develop a method to pay for co-occurring services.

Various agencies have to define their role in the development of a co-occurring infrastructure.

Earlier investigation of the barriers to adoption of new research.

Improve dissemination of co-occurring research Connect service researchers to state systems

Page 14: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Research: What State Directors Want to Know…. What are the most effective models for this

population? What combination of drugs, psychosocial interventions work?

 Is integrated treatment cost effective?  What client, staff factors or other variables are

associated with better outcomes from a fully integrated co-occurring team/site approach vs. lesser integrated models, e.g. consultation or collaboration?

Page 15: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

Research: What State Directors Want to Know Cont…. What EBP’s work for the majority of this population? What portion of

this specific population does an EBP work better for?

  What skill sets/competencies does staff need to have for co-occurring

services and what is the impact on client outcomes? Who should be providing what types of care?

  Are there organizational prerequisites for integrated services to be

successful? What SMHA/SSA actions create readiness to adopt co-occurring services?

  Which elements of identified EBP’s must be implemented with fidelity

to attain outcomes associated with the practices? Which can be modified without sacrificing outcomes? What should be modified with this population?

Page 16: Complexities of  Co-occurring Disorders STATE AGENCY PERSPECTIVE

In conclusion…

Treatment of co-occurring disorders is an important issue for State Directors

  States play a key role in developing, improving and

maintaining an infrastructure in which co-occurring services are provided

  Progress made, but barriers still remain: financing,

workforce, special populations, and research  Partnerships between state agencies, federal agencies,

and researchers is imperative in moving forward