complex needs - mhdcd.unsw.edu.au · complex needs presenter : eileen baldry research team: eileen...
TRANSCRIPT
Complex needs
Presenter : Eileen Baldry Research Team: Eileen Baldry, Leanne Dowse, Melissa
Clarence, Phillip Snoyman, Devon Indig, Ruth McCausland, Han Xu, Peta MacGillivray, Julian Trofimovs
IC Syd Complex needs 11.12.12
Presentation Outline
• ‘Complex needs’ • MHDCD project findings
• Discussion • Conclusions
2
Why the development of ‘complex needs’?
• Moving beyond limited categorizations to recognise reality of lived experience
• Terms dual diagnosis & co-morbidity assume an individual is: • defined by the presence of a primary medical
diagnosis, • only two disorders or impairments exist
simultaneously • these attributes are in some way static within
each individual and do not interact
Complex needs
• People who have complex needs require high levels of health, welfare and other community based services including individuals who experience various combinations of mental illness, intellectual disability, acquired brain injury, physical disability, behavioural difficulties, homelessness, social isolation, family dysfunction, and have problematic drug and/or alcohol use (Hamilton 2010).
• Will return to the problems with this definition.
Negative synergistic interactions in the CJS
The cumulative long-term effect of moving among these different [CJS] sites is rarely explored … combined personal, social and economic costs of this re-cycling process tend not to appear in the formal calculations of cost effectiveness… [through] tracing the movement of these offenders through these regulatory agencies … less likely to see custodial and community-based sanctions as two divergent courses… better able to appreciate the collaborative and mutually reinforcing nature of these sanctions… (2003: 229)
Matthews, R. (2003) ‘ Rethinking Penal Policy: Towards a Systems Approach’ in Matthews, R. and Young, J. (eds) The New Politics of Crime and Punishment, Willan, Cullompton,
The study
! ARC Linkage study 2007-2010 ! CIs: Eileen Baldry, Leanne Dowse, Ian Webster
! PIs: Tony Butler, Simon Eyland, Jim Simpson
• Partner Organisations: Corrective Services NSW, Justice Health, NSW Police, Housing NSW, NSW Council for Intellectual Disability, Juvenile Justice NSW
! Continuing with ARC Linkage Indigenous Australians with mental health disorders and cognitive disability in the CJS
6
The Study approach ! !"#$%&'()**%+,-+"(&,#,(./*0,1"(,*&(2"31/*1!
" "#$#%&'!())*!+,-.&/!0/.1&$!23%4/5!6!7"2!2&.&/89:/!79;.<919&5!:.&.<.;/!
" =::!7.&.!:%.8,!>%#-'!" ?$/!"/,&%/!>#%!0/.1&$!@/;/.%A$!9,!"B2!0/.1&$!C2D!EF:.&.!>%#-!())G!;3%4/5H!
" C2D!7/I.%&-/,&!#>!"#%%/AJ4/!2/%49A/;!!" KL"2=@!" C2D!M#19A/!!" B34/,91/!B3;JA/!" 0#3;9,N!C2D!" =70"!" O/N.1!=9:!C2D!" C2D!0/.1&$!E-#%&.19&5P!I$.%-.QP!.:-9;;9#,;H!" "#--3,9&5!2/%49A/;!R!#3&!#>!$#-/!A.%/!" C/N#J.J,N!M3<19A!S3.%:9.,!6!T9,.,A9.1!U.,.N/%!
7
456(7"3+"38(3".,-%*,.(&,#,7"#(
Cohort ID
2,731
DCS
Police
Court
Housing
Justice Health
Child Services
Health
Disability
Legal Aid
Juvenile Justice
Cognitive Disability
• ID = >70IQ
• BID = <70- >80 IQ
• ABI = persons with brain injury that significantly affects their cognitive and social capabilities
! 1464 people in the CD cohort (All CD) ! Approx 2/3rd in the CD group experience
compounding / complex needs
9%$%3#(:(4;22,3<( ! T311!"#$#%&!CV(PWX*!! +Y!1/;;!&$.,!W)!CVZ[)!! +Y!W)\[)!CVW[X!! U/,&.1!$/.1&$!CVGZ]!! C#!:9.N,#;9;!CVXXG!! 23<;&.,A/!.<3;/!:9;#%:/%!V!*(WZ!! D#-/,!V!**^!! +,:9N/,#3;!=3;&%.19.,;!V!(]^!! _`)^!$.:!<//,!B34/,91/!B3;JA/!A19/,&;!
10
!=>9>(4#;&<'(9%$%3#!
!"# !"$
#%&
!%'!((
!!)
!()
"((
#&!
##&
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
MH
_ID
MH
_BC
D
MH
_AO
D
ID_A
OD
BID
_AO
D ID
BID MH
PD
/AO
D
No
MH
/ID
!"#"$%&'$()*+",-&./&01)2-"313
=1-#;&!a!&$/!A#$#%&!$.;!A#-I1/b!:9.N,#;/;Q!CQK!?$/;/!N%#3I;!.%/!,#&!-3&3.115!/bA13;94/Q!!M/#I1/!8/%/!.;;9N,/:!&#!.!N%#3I!#,!I%/:#-9,.,&!I%/;/,J,N!:9.N,#;9;!E1/c!&#!%9N$&HQ!T#%!9,;&.,A/!&$/!U0d+7!N%#3I!-.5!.1;#!$.4/!.!;3<;&.,A/!.<3;/!:9;#%:/%!
**!ACSPRI Dec 2010
Pathways
12
!=>9>(4#;&<'(?&;@,-%*(!" 79.N,#;/:!N%#3I;!/4/,!1#8/%!1/4/1;!&$.,!N/,/%.1!I%9;#,/%!I#IQ!!
" ?$#;/!89&$!A#-I1/b!,//:;!$.4/!$9N$/%!%.&/;!#>!/bI31;9#,!
" ?$#;/!89&$!;#-/!>#%-!#>!"7!$.4/!&$/!8#%;&!1/4/1;!#>!/:3A.J#,Q!
" "#-I1/b!N%#3I;'!#4/%![)^!$.4/!,#!>#%-.1!e3.19fA.J#,!89&$!-.g#%9&5!1/.49,N!;A$##1!89&$#3&!A#-I1/J,N!h%*)!
School Expulsion: !=>9>(@%$%3#(@%2A,3"&(B/#$()*2,#"(=",.#$(4;3+"<(4,2A."(
Higher proportion of those in the MHDCD cohort both males (44%v 39%) and females (35%v29%) had ever been expelled from school. Much larger % reported being suspended.
C;#(%D($%2"(@,3"(• *(^!#>!&$/!A#$#%&!$.:!<//,!9,!L0"!• Z)^!#>!&$/!L0"!N%#3I!$.4/!A#-I1/b!,//:;!!• [)^!#>!&$9;!N%#3I!$.;!A#N,9J4/!9-I.9%-/,&!• D#-/,!9,!&$/!U07"7!A#$#%&!$.:!.!$9N$/%!%.&/!#>!&$/9%!#8,!I.%/,&!$.49,N!<//,!9,!L0"!&$.,!.11!#&$/%;!
• i.%19/%!I#19A/!A#,&.A&!• ?89A/!.;!-.,5!I#19A/!A#,&.A&;!• ?89A/!.;!-.,5!A3;&#:9.1!/I9;#:/;!• ?$%//!J-/;!.;!19j/15!&#!$.4/!<//,!9,A.%A/%.&/:!.;!g34/,91/!
Disability service
16
" Of those in the ID range (680) 26% ADHC clients
" Of those BID range (783) 5% ADHC clients.
" Very low rate (15%) of CD in cohort with ADHC services " Only 10/709 JJ CD group were ADHC clients " 79% of ADHC clients imprisoned prior to becoming a client
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
ADHC BID ID
Housing Assistance " Significant numbers of the complex
groups experienced homelessness and unstable housing as young people and as adults
" Significant numbers had parent(s) in public housing
" Significant numbers accommodated in refuges and other crisis accommodation.
17
E%./@"(9%*#,@#7(
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MH
_ID
MH
_BID
MH
_AO
D
ID_A
OD
BID
_AO
D
ID
BID
MH
PD
/AO
D
ND
Rat
e P
olic
e C
onta
cts
Avg
Pol
ice
Con
tact
s
M/#I1/!89&$!"#-I1/b!"#N,9J4/!79;.<919&5!$.:!;9N,9fA.,&15!-#%/!I#19A/!A#,&.A&;!#4/%!&$/9%!194/;P!;&.%J,N!5#3,NP!.,:!;9N,9fA.,&15!$9N$/%!%.&/;!#>!I#19A/!A#,&.A&;!I/%!5/.%!
9%*#,@#(B/#$(F;+"*/."(F;7-@"(
!29NQ!$9N$/%!%.&/!#>!</9,N!.!BB!A19/,&!>#%!A#-I#3,:9,N!"7!N%#3I;!\!</&8//,!`)^!&#!Z)^k!=<#%9N9,.1!5#3,N!I/#I1/!;9N!#4/%\%/I%/;/,&/:!!K3&!_!()^!>#%!&$#;/!89&$!,#!:9.N,#;9;!#%!U0!#,15!
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
DJJ Client DJJ Custody Sentenced
First police contact & JJ
20
• All CD complex significantly higher police contacts before JJ client
• Younger at first police contact and younger at first custody than no diagnosis group.
JJ Custodial episodes & LOS
21
CD complex significantly more JJ custodial episodes than MH & no diagnosis. All groups significantly shorter av days (largely remand) than no diagnosis groups
G..(@;7#%&<(
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Average Length of Stay (Days) Days Custody Per Year
?$#;/!89&$!A#-I#3,:9,N!:9;.<919J/;!$.4/!;$#%&/%!:3%.J#,!/.A$!J-/!9,!A3;&#:5P!&$.,!K+7P!U0!!#%!,#!:9.N,#;9;!<3&!;9-91.%!.4Q!,3-</%!#>!:.5;!I/%!5/.%!9,!A3;&#:5!E9/!-#%/!;$#%&!;&.5;HQ!
Pathways Individuals who experience these multiple and compounding
difficulties have significantly: ! higher rate and earlier contact with police ! worse education experience & levels ! lower level disability services than community counterparts ! higher housing support but also higher failed tenancies ! Very high LA provision ! low rates of Sec 32 ! higher rate of JJ contact ! higher offences, convictions, imprisonments (particularly
remand) from an earlier age than single (although these are also generally worse than non diagnosis) and non-diagnosis groups
! shorter and more frequent prison episodes ! higher continuing lifelong CJS episodes
23
Indigenous Australians
• Over-represented in all categories
• Aboriginal women experienced highest levels of compounding factors and disability
Pathways: iterative, looping, cycling, compounding
Poverty/disadvantage
Poor School Education
Lack Disability services
Mental Health Legal Aid
Police
Housing/homelessness
Courts Prison
Post-release
Breaching
Reincarceration
25
Complex Needs
• disability experiences and negative factors that are not addressed and over time compound to form ‘a complex’ or a web that grows more complicated and multifaceted;
• multiple interlocking and compounding experiences and factors that span health and social matters (Rankin & Regan 2004:i).
Individualisation
• The compounding disabilities and disadvantages are attributed primarily to the individual
• Problems individualized (she or he is responsible for the complexity); social & structural factors that created and maintained the need or dysfunction written out of the story
• From at risk to being a risk
So …
• Not simply compiling a checklist of needs. • Three dimensional web of factors, elements
and circumstances that interact simultaneously and across time. The interactions have a compounding effect (like interest on money in a bank account) in that the effect is not just the sum of the individual parts but each aspect adds to and increases the potency of each of the other effects.
Creation of complex needs
• Lack of appropriate support and services, the use of control agencies (eg police as ‘care managers’), application of ‘risk’ management for individuals experiencing multiple disadvantages together with mental and/ or cognitive impairment, compounds these multiple difficult life issues creating complex needs