compilation of proposals

16
Window Painting Robot (arduino, processing, accelerometer) What I think is so enticing about this design is the wide applicability. It allows expression of ideas and creativity in normally unused spaces. The real challenge is what's the biggest glass window can you find? This also has other applications as it could clean windows, or survey the sides of buildings, draw just on floors, etc. The advantage of this design over a polargraph or other drawing method is that it is really easy to set up and draw on any size of window. Later in the 'ible you will find the processing program I wrote for this, which takes input about your window size and robot specs and lets you to draw what you would like the robot to mark on your window; with a touch of a button it turns it into arduino code that fits in the arduino program I have supplied, so it can be easily uploaded to the robot. Then you just put the robot on the wall and watch it go to work! The autonomous nature of this design makes it free of wires while also not relying on any sort of wireless connection to do its work. I did this project with scrap VEX metal and motors I had lying around, but don't be discouraged if you don't have those!!! It will work with any 3 wire motors (and others as well but may take minor changes to code) and whatever materials you have available (wood, metal, plastic, etc). DO NOT be discourage, you can do this project! I always challenge myself to build with what I have and this project cost me a total of $20 so really not an investment. Parts List 2x 3-wire Motors (I used vex 393 motors with motor controllers to make them 3-wire but any will do.) 1x 3-wire Servo (used to raise and lower the pen, I'm using a really small one. Size doesn't matter, in this case.) 1x Arduino Board (I used an uno but any should work!) 2x Neodymium magnets (I got mine from magnet4less.com and went with N42 counter- bored circular magnets 1" diam by 1/2" thick. These are the real crux of the whole project as they need to be strong enough to hold the robot against the wall. My robot weighs 2.5 pounds and these magnets keep it easily attached to windows up to 1" thick! Remember you

Upload: kate-manuel

Post on 14-Dec-2015

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

COMPILATION OF PROPOSALS FOR ELECTIVES, MICROPROCESSOR PROJECTS. ROBOTS, SENSORS, MICROPROCESSORS, ICs

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Compilation of Proposals

Window Painting Robot (arduino, processing, accelerometer)

What I think is so enticing about this design is the wide applicability. It allows expression of ideas and creativity in normally unused spaces. The real challenge is what's the biggest glass window can you find? This also has other applications as it could clean windows, or survey the sides of buildings, draw just on floors, etc.

The advantage of this design over a polargraph or other drawing method is that it is really easy to set up and draw on any size of window. Later in the 'ible you will find the processing program I wrote for this, which takes input about your window size and robot specs and lets you to draw what you would like the robot to mark on your window; with a touch of a button it turns it into arduino code that fits in the arduino program I have supplied, so it can be easily uploaded to the robot. Then you just put the robot on the wall and watch it go to work! The autonomous nature of this design makes it free of wires while also not relying on any sort of wireless connection to do its work.

I did this project with scrap VEX metal and motors I had lying around, but don't be discouraged if you don't have those!!! It will work with any 3 wire motors (and others as well but may take minor changes to code) and whatever materials you have available (wood, metal, plastic, etc). DO NOT be discourage, you can do this project! I always challenge myself to build with what I have and this project cost me a total of $20 so really not an investment. Parts List2x 3-wire Motors (I used vex 393 motors with motor controllers to make them 3-wire but any will do.)

1x 3-wire Servo (used to raise and lower the pen, I'm using a really small one. Size doesn't matter, in this case.)

1x Arduino Board (I used an uno but any should work!)

2x Neodymium magnets (I got mine from magnet4less.com and went with N42 counter-bored circular magnets 1" diam by 1/2" thick. These are the real crux of the whole project as they need to be strong enough to hold the robot against the wall. My robot weighs 2.5 pounds and these magnets keep it easily attached to windows up to 1" thick! Remember you can always add spacers if they are a little strong.)

1x Battery Pack (These are to power the arduino and drive the motors, I used the vex 7.2v pack but use whatever works for you.)

4x Wheels (You can use two but I found four to be alot more precise. Whatever they are make sure they have a rubber coating or some grippy surface.)

1x Tiny Breadboard (This is optional as you can just wire things directly to the arduino, but it help plan the paths out.)

1x Single-Axis Accelerometer (Optional but highly recommended) I'm using one that is twenty years old so really anything will do (they can be found online for cheap). Just remember for our application the lower the g rating the better, mine is +-4g so anything around there will do.

Page 2: Compilation of Proposals

Materials for the body (Use what you have!!!! Those who have a 3d printer, try making a chassis that way. I don't have access to something like that but the lighter, the better! I used some scrap metal.)

Gears (I used vex ones, these are needed to drive wheels if you are doing a four wheeled design. People with 3d printers can make their own but for those without access lego gears are a possibility if the mounts are drilled out. Be creative!)

Window Markers!

Random bits of wire/screws to hook everything up.

MEMS ACCELEROMETER BASED HEAD GESTURED CONTROLLED FIRE FIGHTING ROBOT

The main aim of this project is to develop a most secure access control system to operate a robot by using MEMS based

accelerometer with firefighting system. MEMS is a Micro Electro Mechanical Sensor which is a highly sensitive sensor and capable of

detecting the tilt. This sensor finds the tilt and makes use of the accelerometer to change the direction of the robot depending on

tilt. For example if the tilt is to the right side then the robot moves in right direction or if the tilt is to the left side then the robot

moves in left direction. Robot movement can be controlled in Forward, Reverse, Left and Right direction. This robot can be also used

to extinguish the fire.

This device is portable and this system operation is entirely driven by wireless RF technology. User can wear it to his head and can

operate it by tilting the MEMS Accelerometer sensor.

RF Communication ranges in between 30 KHz to 300 GHz. RF communication works by creating electromagnetic waves at a source

and being able to pick up those electromagnetic waves at a particular destination. These electromagnetic waves travel through the

air at near the speed of light. The wavelength of an electromagnetic signal is inversely proportional to the frequency; the higher the

frequency, the shorter the wavelength.

This project makes use of a micro controller, which is programmed, with the help of embedded C instructions. This microcontroller is

capable of communicating with transmitter and receiver modules. The MEMS based sensor detects the tilt and provides the

information to the microcontroller (on board computer) and the controller judges whether the instruction is right movement or left

movement instruction and controls the direction respectively. The controller is interfaced with two dc motors to control the

direction of the robot.

The main objectives of the project are:

1. Wireless controlling of a Robot.

2. Controlling the movement of Robot by head gestures.

3. Voice enabled control.

4. Fire fighting system.

This project provides us with the learning’s on the following aspects:

1. MEMS accelerometer.

2. Interfacing Motors with Microcontroller.

3. Interfacing MEMS with Microcontroller.

4. Embedded C programming.

5. RF technology.

Page 3: Compilation of Proposals

6. Interfacing of RF transmitter and receiver to Microcontroller.

7. 7. Voice circuit.

The major building blocks of this project are:

1. Regulated Power Supply.

2. Microcontroller.

3. MEMS Accelerometer sensor.

4. RF transmitter and receiver modules.

5. Encoder and Decoder.

6. Reset.

7. 7. Crystal oscillator.

8. 8. DC motors with drivers.

9. 9. LED indicators

Software’s used:

1. PIC-C compiler for Embedded C programming.

2. PIC kit 2 programmer for dumping code into Micro controller.

3. Express SCH for Circuit design.

Building a Maze Solving Robot – My Experiences

This year (2001), my parents have assigned me the task of doing a science fair project. After many many brainstorming ideas, I’ve finally settled on the idea of a project about maze solving robots and algorithms. I read Robot Science and Technology’s article about the C* algorithm, with just a little bit of confusion. After 3 readings I still don’t get it, so I decided I’d better start off simpler. I’ve also played around with Maze Bots, and read over their listings of algorithms. After much deliberation I finally decided on 3 different algorithms to do a project on:

This year (2001), my parents have assigned me the task of doing a science fair project. After many many brainstorming ideas, I’ve finally settled on the idea of a project about maze solving robots and algorithms. I read Robot Science and Technology’s article about the C* algorithm, with just a little bit of confusion. After 3 readings I still don’t get it, so I decided I’d better start off simpler. I’ve also played around with Maze Bots, and read over their listings of algorithms. After much deliberation I finally decided on 3 different algorithms to do a project on:

1. Random solving

2. Left/Right wall following

3. A branching search pattern where you return to the last branch after a dead end.

Random Algorithm

This is by far the simplest way of solving a maze. Mind you know, I didn’t say best or shortest or fastest, but simplest. You simply have your robot run around making a random decision to turn or not when it encounters a opening to the left or right. The onlyproblem with this, as I mentioned above, is that I will be slow, and there is a good possibility that the robot will not find the exit inthe time allotted. I.E. Your robot could wander for hours always taking the wrong turns. Needless to say, it is probably well worth it to invest some programming time into a better algorithm if you are looking for speed or accuracy.

Left/Right Algorithm

Ahhh … the amateur roboticists favorite. The whole principle behind this algorithm is that you can solve any continuous, i.e. no “islands”, maze by following either the right hand or left hand wall. This will always get you out, unless the finish is is a “island,”like the picture below.

Page 4: Compilation of Proposals

In the above maze, a robot using the left/right wall following algorithm would never reach the exit. This algorithm is just slightly

more complex to code, but it’s benefits over the random algorithm are large. Simply have your robot turn to the left (or right)

whenever it encounters a doorway. Again, the downside of this algorithm is speed. One wall may continue for a long way before

reaching the end.

Branch And Return Algorithm

Branch and return is simply a name that I made up. I’m sure there is some technical name, but for now that name will do. This

is the most complex out of the three that I have chosen for my project. The principle behind this algorithm is that by exploring each

branch of the maze you will eventually find the exit. This algorithm requires that you “remember” when you come to a branch, and

begin to record your steps from that branch. After exploring that branch and you come to a dead end, you simple follow your path

back to the original branch and take the next turn. This algorithm require much more coding, and some way of knowing your

distance and direction, like wheel encoders, or maybe a accelerometer and compass. The problem with this algorithm is that the

robot could fall into a endless loop. For instance suppose we had a maze that looked like this:

If the robot is heading from the top of the maze toward ‘a’ it then may decide to take a right and follow the corridor until it reaches

‘b’, it then might turn left and reach ‘a’ again, and then follow back to ‘b’, and never realize that it is going in a circle. One possible

way to combat this is to have the robot take a random corridor when coming to an intersection. Giving the robot a degree of

“forgetfulness”, i.e. having it forget intersections encountered long ago, could prevent it from being caught in a very long loop.

Concrete – Actual implementation

For my science fair project, I plan on running the same robot through 2 or 3 different mazes for each algorithm, and recording it’s

time. Personally, I tend to change my robots chassis every few months. The biggest reason for this is that I usually have built the

chassis out of legos, and/or tape. This makes for quick ripping apart and rebuilding. I’ve finally settled on a design that I think I’ll keep

for a while. I’ve built my latest robot chassis out of balsa wood. The main body is a 6 x 6 x 0.25 in (15 x 15 x 0.63 cm) flat

square.

Page 5: Compilation of Proposals

I’ve mounted two 4 battery packs on the back end of it, and centered two servers on either side. I secured two 6 x 3 inch balsa

pieces together with wood glue and some reinforcing pieces of wood to form the main base. For each servo I built a small box on the

bottom that just houses the box of the servo. For wheels, I’ve used two of the large lego wheels. They can be screwed very nicely to

the servo shaft, and the have a excellent grip because of the rubber treaded tires.

In the front bottom of the base I’ve mounted on of Craig Maynards BOBIRD (Brains On Board Infrared Detectors) for central obstacle

detection. At the moment I’m having a bit of trouble with the detector seeing the floor.

I also plan to place at least two more IRPD sensors on the top front for extra detection, and possible a few on the back for reverse

detection.

For processing power I’m going to use a OOPic, and possible a Basic Stamp 2. The OOPic’s high level programming language makes it

much easier than the Basic Stamp’s dumbed down language. For distance ranging (if I ever wanted to turn it into a firefighter) I will

either mount a Sharp GPDU12 on a servo in the bots middle, for rotational ranging, or stationary at the front of the bot, for frontal

ranging. Most likely I’ll also mount a breadboard on the bot for easy prototyping (and in my case permanent circuits!). Basically, my

whole chassis is held together by Elmer’s and wood screws. Next month, I hope to be able to talk a bit about the code and hardware

for navigating the maze.

Page 6: Compilation of Proposals

Path Remembering Robot

Project Developed by:-

Piyush Arora, Shubham Aggarwal , B.Tech E.C.E. 3rd year, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar

Description:-

This robot is used to trace the different paths. Firstly, the drive the robot on the path to be traced manually. This path is then saved

in the microcontroller using counts. Then the same path can be traced automatically by the robot in trace mode. There are three

different modes in this robot.

1.Save path mode:- This mode is used to save the path.

2.Do not save mode:- In this mode, the path is not saved in controller.

3.Trace mode:- In this mode, the robot will trace the path saved in the controller.

Components Used:-

AVR Development Board, Switches, Connecting Wires

Applications:-

This robot can be used whenever there is a need to drive the robot on the same path more than once.

The robot can trace path more quickly because it does not save the stop command.

This robot can be used in robot races.

This robot can be used in the tough tracks also. First, you can drive manually then it will trace the path faster.

Metal Detector Robotic Vehicle

he project is designed to develop a robotic vehicle that can sense metals ahead of it on its path similar to sensing land mines. The

robot is controlled by a remote using RF technology.

It consists of a metal detector circuit interfaced to the control unit that alarms the user behind it about a suspected land mine

ahead. An 8051 series of microcontroller is used for the desired operation.

At the transmitting end using push buttons, commands are sent to the receiver to control the movement of the robot either to move

forward, backward and left or right etc. At the receiving end two motors are interfaced to the microcontroller where they are used

for the movement of the vehicle.

The RF transmitter acts as a RF remote control that has the advantage of adequate range (up to 200 meters) with proper antenna,

while the receiver decodes before feeding it to another microcontroller to drive DC motors via motor driver IC for necessary work.

A metal detector circuit is mounted on the robot body and its operation is carried out automatically on sensing a any metal

underneath. As soon as the robot senses this metal it generates an alarm sound. This is to alert the operator of a possible metal (eg:

land mine) ahead on its path.

Further the project can be enhanced by mounting a wireless camera on the robot so that the operator can control the movement of

the robot remotely by watching it on a screen.

Page 7: Compilation of Proposals

RF Controlled Robotic Vehicle with Laser Beam Arrangement

The project is designed to control a robotic vehicle by using a RF technology for remote operation. A low power laser light is

interfaced for demonstrating the possibilities of destroying a distant object by its beam. An 8051 series of microcontroller is used for

the desired operation.

Page 8: Compilation of Proposals

At the transmitting end using push buttons, commands are sent to the receiver to control the movement of the robot either to move

forward, backward and left or right etc. At the receiving end two motors are interfaced to the microcontroller where they are used

for the movement of the vehicle.

The RF transmitter acts as a RF remote control that has the advantage of adequate range (up to 200 meters) with proper antenna,

while the receiver decodes before feeding it to another microcontroller to drive DC motors via motor driver IC for necessary work.

A laser pen is mounted on the robot body and its operation is carried out from the microcontroller output through appropriate

signal from the transmitting end. The laser light used is just for demonstration purpose and not a powerful one.

Further the project can be enhanced using DTMF technology. Using this technology we can control the robotic vehicle by using cell

phone. This technology has an advantage over long communication range as compared to RF technology.

Page 9: Compilation of Proposals

War Field Spying Robot with Night Vision Wireless Camera

The project is designed to develop a robotic vehicle using RF technology for remote operation attached with wireless camera for

monitoring purpose. The robot along with camera can wirelessly transmit real time video with night vision capabilities. This is kind

of robot can be helpful for spying purpose in war fields. An 8051 series of microcontroller is used for the desired operation.

At the transmitting end using push buttons, commands are sent to the receiver to control the movement of the robot either to move

forward, backward and left or right etc. At the receiving end two motors are interfaced to the microcontroller where they are used

for the movement of the vehicle.

The RF transmitter acts as a RF remote control that has the advantage of adequate range (up to 200 meters) with proper antenna,

while the receiver decodes before feeding it to another microcontroller to drive DC motors via motor driver IC for necessary work. A

wireless camera is mounted on the robot body for spying purpose even in complete darkness by using infrared lighting.

Further the project can be enhanced using DTMF technology. Using this technology we can control the robotic vehicle by using cell

phone. This technology has an advantage over long communication range as compared to RF technology.

Page 10: Compilation of Proposals

Fire Fighting Robotic Vehicle

The project is designed to develop a fire fighting robot using RF technology for remote operation. The robotic vehicle is loaded with

water tanker and a pump which is controlled over wireless communication to throw water. An 8051 series of microcontroller is used

for the desired operation.

At the transmitting end using push buttons, commands are sent to the receiver to control the movement of the robot either to move

forward, backward and left or right etc. At the receiving end three motors are interfaced to the microcontroller where two of them

are used for the movement of the vehicle and the remaining one to position the arm of the robot.

The RF transmitter acts as a RF remote control that has the advantage of adequate range (up to 200 meters) with proper antenna,

while the receiver decodes before feeding it to another microcontroller to drive DC motors via motor driver IC for necessary work.

Page 11: Compilation of Proposals

A water tank along with water pump is mounted on the robot body and its operation is carried out from the microcontroller output

through appropriate signal from the transmitting end. The whole operation is controlled by an 8051 series microcontroller. A motor

driver IC is interfaced to the microcontroller through which the controller drives the motors.

Further the project can be enhanced by interfacing it with a wireless camera so that the person controlling it can view operation of

the robot remotely on a screen.

Page 12: Compilation of Proposals

IR Controlled Robotic Vehicle

The project is designed to control a robotic vehicle using a standard TV remote . IR sensor is interfaced to the control unit on the

robot for sensing the IR signals transmitted by the remote. This data is conveyed to the control unit which moves the robot as

desired.

An 8051 series microcontroller is used in this project as control device.

Transmitting end uses a TV remote through which IR commands are transmitted. At the receiver end, these commands are used for

controlling the robot in all directions such as forward, backward and left or right etc. At the receiving end the movement is achieved

by two motors that are interfaced to the microcontroller.

RC5 based coded data sent from the TV remote is received by an IR receiver interfaced to the microcontroller. The program on the

microcontroller refers to the RC5 code to generate respective output based on the input data to operate the motors through a

motor driver IC.

The motors are interfaced to the control unit through motor driver IC. Further the project can be enhanced by DTMF technology.

With this technology we can control the robotic vehicle by a cell phone. This technology has an advantage over long communication

range as compared to line of sight communication in IR technology

Page 13: Compilation of Proposals

Voice Controlled Robotic Vehicle with Long Distance Speech Recognition

The project is designed to control a robotic vehicle by voice commands for remote operation. An 8051 series of microcontroller is

used together with a speech recognition module for the desired operation.

At the transmitting end using push buttons or voice commands are sent by RF to the receiver to control the movement of the robot

either to move forward, backward and left or right etc. At the receiving end two motors are interfaced to the microcontroller where

they are used for the movement of the vehicle.

The RF transmitter can take either switch press or voice commands which are converted to encoded digital data for the advantage of

adequate range (up to 200 meters) from the robot. The receiver decodes the data before feeding it to another microcontroller to

drive DC motors via motor driver IC for necessary work.

Further the project can be enhanced using DTMF technology. Using this technology we can control the robotic vehicle by using cell

phone. This technology has an advantage over long communication range as compared to RF technology.

Page 14: Compilation of Proposals