comparison of permeability test methods to...
TRANSCRIPT
Comparison of permeability test methods
to characterize on-site rainwater infiltration
July. 4. 2017
Jooho Chung, Miyajawa Hiroshi, Mooyoung Han
Seoul National University
1
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Materials & Methods
3. Results & Discussion
4. Conclusion
2
1. Introduction
(1) Background
(2) Low Impact Development (LID) Facilities
(3) Infiltration Facility Installation Procedure
(5) Objectives
3
(4) Necessity of proper Hydraulic conductivity
Drought
1) Introduction
(1) Background
Heat island phenomena Urban flooding
4
Low Impact Development
Heavy Rain
Heavy Rain
Retention
Runoff reduction
River runoff Reduction
Rain-Harvesting facility
Infiltration facility
Reservoir
Retention
Retention
Infiltration Retention
[LID- Sponge city]
• A project to solve the country's flooding problems.
• To overcome urban floods and droughts and
encourage the securing of water resources.
(2) Low Impact Development (LID) Facilities
5
吸
排
滞
用
蓄
Sponge city concept
infiltration
净
cleaning harvesting
using discharging
saving
1. Soil characteristic measurement 2. Infiltration facility design 3. Infiltration facility construction
Hydraulic conductivity, K
1) Introduction
(3) Infiltration Facility Installation Procedure
7
(4) Necessity of proper Hydraulic conductivity
Efficiency & Affordability
Hydraulic conductivity, K
Overestimated A lack of facility installation
Underestimated Excessive installation of facilities
Possibility of Flood
Economic waste
1) Introduction
(4) Objectives
Determination of
applicable permeability test
for infiltration of rainwater
Identification of rainwater
infiltration characteristics
9
2. Materials and methods
(1) On-site Infiltration characteristics of rainwater
(2) Hydraulic Conductivity methods
10
PERCOLATION
INFILTRATION from saturated pond
RUN OFF
Soil zone UNSATURATED
Ground water zone SATURATED
Capillary fringe
0
50
100
150
Monthly Precification(mm)
2. Vertical Infiltration
Rainwater infiltration during
rainfall is due to gravity and
infiltrates vertically.
3. Different flow velocity
and direction
Evaporation
Run off, Percolation,
Infiltration, Storage.
4. Three phase
①Air
②Soil Particle
③Water
1. Unsaturated Soil
Surface zone of soil is
unsaturated zone and remain as
unsaturated soil even in the event
of rainfall.
5. Influence of Previous rainfall
2) Materials and methods
(1) On-site Infiltration characteristics of rainwater
11
2) Materials and methods
(2) Hydraulic Conductivity methods
[ Typical methods used to measure the permeability of soil ]
TSB
Ring Infiltrometer
ETC
(based on Darcy’s law)
K
Disc Permeameter
Comparison of permeability tests with rainwater characteristics.
12
1.TSB Method
scale standpipe
seal casing
Borehole extension L
Smear zone
H H
TBM step1 TBM step2
2. Ring infiltrometer 3. ETC (Darcy’s Law)
surface
Diameter 20cm
Auger hole
Filter(gravel) Filter (sand)
• Fully saturated soil
• Kv, Kh
• Measure the water level
based on falling head
method.
• Fully saturated soil
• Kv, Kh
• Measure the constant
water level changing
in Inner ring
• Fully saturated soil,
horizontal flow
• Kh
(2) Hydraulic Conductivity methods
13
4. Disk Permeameter
z2
• Unsaturated permeability
• Measures decreasing water level in mariotte bottle
occurred by small negative pressure at ponding on soil
surface.
Disk with membrane
Tube A
Tube B
Bubble
tower
Mariotte
bottle
Relatively low-permeability soil
Relatively high-permeability soil
Z1
Z2
(2) Hydraulic Conductivity methods
14
3. Results and discussion
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity comparison
(2) Hydraulic Conductivity Test Methods Comparison
15
3) Results and Discussion
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity comparison
Site Soil
Condition Type Depth
In-situ Clay (USCS) 40m • Steady water flow
• Same water ponding
1. Two Stage Borehole test / Double-ring Infiltrometer
Hydraulic Conductivity (K) [×E-10 cm/s]
TSB test Double-ring Infiltrometer
2.1 < 33
In TSB method, Hydraulic conductivity is underestimated
by excavation surface disturbance.
Comparison of four methods to assess Hydraulic conductivity
C.Benson et al. (1997) 16
1571%
2. Double-ring Infiltrometer / Disk Permeameter
Double-ring and tension infiltrometer measurements Of hydraulic conductivity and mobile soil regions
John M. Köhne et al.(2011)
Hydraulic Conductivity (K) [×E-4 cm/s]
Double ring Infiltrometer Disk Permeameter
2.3 > 0.17
Pressure losses across thin sand layer is the reason.
Site Soil Condition
Type Depth
Dummerstorf.
Germany Sandy loam
( WRB classifications) 50mm
• Annual precipitation: 65mm
• Annual temperature: 8.2 C
• Steady water flow
• Same water ponding
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity comparison
17
1352%
3. Two stage borehole method/ Disk Permeameter
Report of on-site infiltration methods in Chiba ken
Miyajaki takeshi.(2005)
Hydraulic Conductivity (K) [×E-3 cm/s]
Two Stage Borehole Disk Permeameter
1.17 < 8.36
In TSB method, Hydraulic conductivity is underestimated
by excavation surface disturbance.
Site Soil Condition
Type Depth
Chiba.Japan Sandy soil mixed
with clay( USCS) 30mm
• Annual precipitation: 139mm
• Annual temperature: 17.5 C
• Same water ponding
(1) Hydraulic Conductivity comparison
18
714%
[Hydraulic conductivity Comparison]
19
Hydraulic conductivity(cm/s)
Methods Clay
(a) Benson, et al (1997)
Sandy loam
(b) Rostock (2005)
Sandy soil mixed with
clay
(c) 宮澤 博 (2012)
Ring
infiltrometer 3.3E-09 2.3E-02 -
Difference 1571% 1352% 714%
TSB 2.1E-10 - 1.17E-03
Disk
permeameter - 1.7E-03 8.36E-03
Remarks
• TSB
Risk of soil disturbance
Underestimated hydraulic
conductivity
• Ring Infiltrometer
Difficulty to apply a wide
range of soil characteristics
Overestimated hydraulic
conductivity
• TSB
Risk of soil disturbance
Underestimated hydraulic
conductivity
PERCOLATION
INFILTRATION from saturated pond
RUN OFF
Soil zone UNSATURATED
Ground water zone SATURATED
Capillary fringe 2. Vertical Infiltration
3. Different flow velocity and direction
4. Three phase
1. Unsaturated Soil
5. Influence of Previous rainfall
2) Materials and methods
(1) On-site Infiltration characteristics of rainwater
20
6. on-site infiltration
Vertical
infiltration
Unsaturated
soil
Different flow
velocity and
direction
Three
phase
Influence of
Precious
rainfall
Remarks
ETC
(Darcy’s law) X X X X X
• Cam measure only horizontal
flow
• In-situ experiments fail to
detect site characteristics
TSB ○ X X X X • Assuming saturated soil
• Possible disturbance during
construction.
Ring
infiltrometer ○ X X ○ X • Assuming saturated soil
Disk
permeameter ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
21
The most reliable measurement method in the on-site hydraulic conductivity evaluation is
the disk permeameter
(2) Hydraulic Conductivity Test Methods Comparison
22
Infiltration rate Runoff rate
Infiltration velocity measurement using Disk Permeameter gives
approximately similar result compare to the modeling data
(P.Nyman,2014)
[ Disk Permeameter’s reliable data ]
Comparison of rainfall infiltration to Creek in eastern. P.Nyman, et al. (2014)
4. Conclusion
23
4) Conclusion
• Rainwater infiltration is gaining much attention to improve the water
circulation status in LID or Spongy city projects around the world.
• However, Rainwater infiltration into the soil is unique area, unlike general
infiltration.
1. vertical infiltration 2. Unsaturated soil 3. characteristic of on-site soil
• The proper determination of rainwater permeability in soil is essential in
the design.
• Until now, the permeability test was either an in-site test or did not take
into account the infiltration characteristics of rainwater during the on-site
test.
Among several existing permeability test methods,
the most accurate method is found to be Disk permeameter method.
24
25
What about your country?
what do you think?
Thank you
26
[ Future study ]
1. Determination of proper hydraulic conductivity with soil characteristics of the
Korea and China
27
2. Suggestion of the standards of infiltration facility design
3. Prediction of infiltration facility performance
• Maximize the facility performance & Reduction of Flood effect
Storage
StorageInfiltarion
Infiltarion