comparison of oh in geos-chem and gmi/aura4 · 2017. 1. 24. · geos-chem v8-01-01 and gmi...
TRANSCRIPT
Comparison of OH in GEOS-Chem and GMI/Aura4
Jennifer Logan, Jingqiu Mao, Junhua Liu, Inna Megretskaia
HarvardBryan Duncan
NASA
GEOS-Chem V8-01-01 and GMI Combo/aura4 runBoth simulations used:• GEOS-4 met fields for 2005• Similar anthro. emissions• Same biomass burning emissions• Same MEGAN base rates – I think• Different lightning NOx scheme• Similar ozone columns (often within 5%)But:• Mean 0H is ~25% different, with GMI lower
OH dependence on precursors:
OH = ( 2k2[O1D][H2O] + [HO2] {k6[O3] + k7[NO]} + 2J9 [H2O2] )----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( k3[CO] + k4[CH4] )
GMI(=JPL2006):O1D+N2: 2.15e-11exp(110/T) the sameO1D+O2: 3.3e-11exp(55/T)O1D+H2O: 1.63e-11exp(60/T)
GEOS-CHEM(v8-01-01):O1D+N2: 2.14e-11exp(110/T) the sameO1D+O2: 3.2e-11exp(70/T)O1D+H2O: 1.45e-11exp(89/T)
GMI: FAST-Jx
GEOS-Chem (v8-01-01):FAST-J from 1999.
GEOS-Chem (v8-02-01):FAST-JX 2008 input≈GMI input for J valuefor O(1D)
Difference in O(1D) + O2 is 2-3.5%, but O(1D) + N2 is the same so <0.7% diff. in O(1D) + N2, O2. At most 2% difference in O(1D) + H2O.
This doesn’t account for the differences we see in OH.
220 240 260 280 3003.95
4
4.05
4.1
4.15
4.2
4.25
4.3
4.35
4.4x 10-11
Temperature(K)
220 240 260 280 3001.95
2
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25x 10-11
Temperature(K)
GMI(O1D+O2)GC(O1D+O2)
GMI(O1D+H2O)GC(O1D+H2O)
Rates for O(1D) quenching.
OH zonal mean, July 2005
1.2
1.4 1.6
Ratio: G-Chem/GMIMean = 1.24
GEOS-Chem GMI/Aura4
V8-01-01
Mean OH = 1.26 x 106
(1000-300 hPa)Mean OH = 1.02 x 106
(1000-300 hPa)
J value (O3 + hv -> O(1D) + O2) July 2005
Column within 5%
Ozone column used for J-value calc.
1.21.1
1.0
GEOS-Chem GMI/Aura4
Updated input to Fast-J so ≈the same as in GMI
Column within 5%
Ozone column used for J-value calc.
1.21.1
1.0
Input updated to Fast-JX 2008
Why differences? Treatment of clouds? Aerosols? Test with clear sky calc.
Makes the problem worse
NOx July 2005GEOS-Chem GMI/Aura4
1.1
1.51.8 2.5 GEOS-Chem/GMI
LNOx = 0.76 Tg(0.33 Tg, 24N-32S) LNOx = 0.49 Tg
(0.31 Tg, 24N-32S)
OH ratio has a strong dependence on NOx
1.2
1.4 1.6
1.21.1
1.0
1.1
1.51.8 2.5
OH ratio
CO ratioJ value ratio
NOx ratio
0.90.95 0.85
July 2005
Ratio plots for Oct. 2005 (not much LNOx in extratropics)
Column within 5%
OH NOx
J value
Merged ozone data set used for GEOS-Chem
New versions of GEOS-Chem
Mean OH in benchmark runs:
V7-04-13: 12.1 x 105
V8-01-04: 11.1 x 105
V8-02-01: 11.8 x 105
JPL-2006, new FAST-J input,new emissions
Old rates and FAST-J input
GEOS-5.1.0 GEOS-5
GEOS-4
Last benchmark on GEOS-4,old emissions
GEOS-5 runs used latest emissions, MEGAN rates, difference is chemistry update
Summary, GMI vs. GEOS-Chem
• Need to resolve difference in J value for O(1D) production, as both models use the same method – FAST-J
• Compare clear sky calc. to see if cloud treatment is the cause
• Compare with zero aerosols• Do both within each model• Clearly, lightning NOx also drives much of
the difference