- comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · see profile shashi kumar indian...

33
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331704555 Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the penetration depth of L- band S-band (NISAR mission) microwave SAR signals into the ground Presentation · March 2019 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20277.12005/1 CITATIONS 0 READS 84 4 authors: Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) Project View project Persistent Scatter Interferometric Synthetic Aperture RADAR ( PsInSAR) View project Abhilash Singh Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal 7 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Ganesh Kumar Meena Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal 2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICATIONS 164 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Kumar Gaurav Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris 11 PUBLICATIONS 111 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Abhilash Singh on 13 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Upload: others

Post on 28-Sep-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331704555

Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the penetration depth of L-

band S-band (NISAR mission) microwave SAR signals into the ground

Presentation · March 2019

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20277.12005/1

CITATIONS

0READS

84

4 authors:

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) Project View project

Persistent Scatter Interferometric Synthetic Aperture RADAR ( PsInSAR) View project

Abhilash Singh

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal

7 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Ganesh Kumar Meena

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal

2 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Shashi Kumar

Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India

94 PUBLICATIONS   164 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Kumar Gaurav

Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris

11 PUBLICATIONS   111 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Abhilash Singh on 13 March 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Page 2: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the penetration depthof L-band S-band (NISAR mission) microwave SAR signals into the

ground.

Abhilash Singh1, Ganesh Kumar Meena1, Shashi Kumar2, Kumar Gaurav1

1Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesIndian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal

2Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun

Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow

09-15 March 2019Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 1 / 27

Page 3: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Outline

1 IntroductionSoil moisture and Microwave remote sensingPenetration depthPermittivity

2 ModelsRelation between soil moisture and permittivityDobson Vs. Hallikainen empirical modelDobson semi-empirical model

3 Results

4 Conclusion

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 2 / 27

Page 4: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Introduction: Soil moisture and it is important

Soil moisture is a measure of temporary storage of water contained in thesoil pores.

}Root zone: Area of interest

Root

Solid Particles Air pores

Application of soil moisture: Flood monitoring, Crop monitoring,Hydrological modelling etc.Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 3 / 27

Page 5: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Microwave remote sensing for soil moisture

higher sensitivity towards the dielectric properties of soil

ability to penetrate deep into the soil medium

weather independent

Soil

θί

θr

Nadir

(X-,C-,S-,L-band)

Incedent μ wave Backscattered

μ wave

© xmple.com

xmple.com

Waterε~80ε~(2-4) ε~(2-40)

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 4 / 27

Page 6: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Penetration depth

Power(P)

Dep

th(d

)

Transmitted μ-wave

Nor

mal

δp

P0P0/e

e=2.71 1/e=0.37 P=P0*γ*e-2jKzd

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 5 / 27

Page 7: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Penetration depth: sensitivity

Target property

δp = f (

ε=ε′−jε′′︷ ︸︸ ︷S ,C ,VWC )

Sensor property

δp = f (θi , λ)

On combining both:

δp = f (ε, λ, θi )

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 6 / 27

Page 8: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Penetration depth: sensitivity

Target property

δp = f (

ε=ε′−jε′′︷ ︸︸ ︷S ,C ,VWC )

Sensor property

δp = f (θi , λ)

On combining both:

δp = f (ε, λ, θi )

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 6 / 27

Page 9: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Penetration depth

δpSinθί

δpCosθίδp

Soil

θί

θr

Nadir

At Nadir︷ ︸︸ ︷δp =

λ ∗√ε′

2π ∗ ε′′

δ′p ≈ δp ∗ cosθi︸ ︷︷ ︸Off Nadir

Unknown : ε

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 7 / 27

Page 10: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Permittivity of material

It is a measure of how easy or difficult to form an electric field inside of amedium.

Complex permittivity (ε) isdefine as

ε = ε′ − jε′′

ε′= Dielectric constant

ε′′= Dielectric loss factor

ε′ is the measure of how muchenergy from an external electric fieldis stored in a material. ε′′ measureshow much lossy a material is to anexternal electric field. i.e. how muchenergy is lost (converted to heat) inthe material.

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 8 / 27

Page 11: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Models: soil moisture Vs. permittivity

Empirical models

Dobson empirical model

Hallikainen empirical model

Semi-empirical models

Dobson semi-empirical model

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 9 / 27

Page 12: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Models: soil moisture Vs. permittivity

Empirical models

Dobson empirical model

Hallikainen empirical model

Semi-empirical models

Dobson semi-empirical model

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 9 / 27

Page 13: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Dobson Vs. Hallikainen empirical model

Dobson model: [1.4 GHz, L & 5 GHz, C-band]

ε = a0 + (a1 + b1S + c1C )w + (a2 + b2S + c2C )w2 + (a3 + b3S + c3C )w3

Hallikainen model: [1.4, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, & 18 GHz, L, S, C, X,Ku -bands]

ε = (a0 + a1S + a2C ) + (b0 + b1S + b2C )w + (c0 + c1S + c2C )w2

where, S and C is the percentage of sand and clay respectively. w is thevolumetric water content (VWC) in [m3/m3]

Both these empirical models are valid only up to a VWC of 50%

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 10 / 27

Page 14: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Dobson Vs. Hallikainen empirical model

Dobson model: [1.4 GHz, L & 5 GHz, C-band]

ε = a0 + (a1 + b1S + c1C )w + (a2 + b2S + c2C )w2 + (a3 + b3S + c3C )w3

Hallikainen model: [1.4, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, & 18 GHz, L, S, C, X,Ku -bands]

ε = (a0 + a1S + a2C ) + (b0 + b1S + b2C )w + (c0 + c1S + c2C )w2

where, S and C is the percentage of sand and clay respectively. w is thevolumetric water content (VWC) in [m3/m3]

Both these empirical models are valid only up to a VWC of 50%

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 10 / 27

Page 15: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Dobson semi-empirical model

ε′ = [1 + (ρbρs

)(εαs ) + wβ ′ε′fαw − w ]

ε′′ = [wβ ′′ε′′fαw ]

whereα = 0.65 & ρs = 2.66 g/cm3

β′ = 1.2748− 0.519S − 0.152C & β′′ = 1.33797− 0.603S − 0.166CS and C represent the fraction of sand and clay in the soil

εs = (1.01 + 0.44ρs)2 − 0.062 Its value ranges between 3 ∼ 5

ε′fw = ε

′w∞ + ε

′wo−ε

′w∞

1+(2πf τw )2

ε′′fw = 2πf τw (ε

′wo−ε

′w∞)

1+(2πf τw )2 + σeff (ρs−ρb)2πεo f (ρs w)

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 11 / 27

Page 16: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Dobson semi-empirical model

2πτw = 0.58 x 10−10 ε′wo = 80.1

εwo : static dielectric constant for water

The high frequency limit of ε′fw is denoted by εw∞ = 4.9

σeff = −1.645 + 1.939ρb − 2.25622S + 1.594C

Valid for frequencies 1.4-18 GHz .

What to do for frequencies 0.3-1.3 GHz??

. First change involves a linear correction to ε′

given by

ε′0.3−1.3GHz = 1.156ε

′ − 0.68

and second change involves in the value of effective conductivity given byσeff = 0.0467 + 0.2204ρb − 0.4111S + 0.6614C

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 12 / 27

Page 17: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Dobson semi-empirical model

2πτw = 0.58 x 10−10 ε′wo = 80.1

εwo : static dielectric constant for water

The high frequency limit of ε′fw is denoted by εw∞ = 4.9

σeff = −1.645 + 1.939ρb − 2.25622S + 1.594C

Valid for frequencies 1.4-18 GHz .

What to do for frequencies 0.3-1.3 GHz??

. First change involves a linear correction to ε′

given by

ε′0.3−1.3GHz = 1.156ε

′ − 0.68

and second change involves in the value of effective conductivity given byσeff = 0.0467 + 0.2204ρb − 0.4111S + 0.6614C

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 12 / 27

Page 18: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Dobson semi-empirical model

2πτw = 0.58 x 10−10 ε′wo = 80.1

εwo : static dielectric constant for water

The high frequency limit of ε′fw is denoted by εw∞ = 4.9

σeff = −1.645 + 1.939ρb − 2.25622S + 1.594C

Valid for frequencies 1.4-18 GHz .

What to do for frequencies 0.3-1.3 GHz??

. First change involves a linear correction to ε′

given by

ε′0.3−1.3GHz = 1.156ε

′ − 0.68

and second change involves in the value of effective conductivity given byσeff = 0.0467 + 0.2204ρb − 0.4111S + 0.6614C

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 12 / 27

Page 19: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Comparison between models

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content (%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40C

ompl

ex p

erm

itivi

tyFor S=75% and C=10%

Dobson-semiempiricalDobson-empirical,Hallikainen-empirical

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 13 / 27

Page 20: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Comparison between models

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Volumetric Water Content (%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Com

plex

per

miti

vity

TDR measurement Vs Theoretical models

Dobson-semiempiricalDobson-empiricalHallikainen-empiricalSoil-1 (Field)Soil-2 (Field)Soil-3 (Field)

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 14 / 27

Page 21: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Soil Information

Table: Physical properties of soil

Soil Soil proportion (%) Bulk densitytype Sand Silt Clay (g/cm3)

Sand 86.7 7.8 5.5 1.57

Loam 61.3 23.1 15.6 1.42

Clay 17.79 31.14 51.07 1.28

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 15 / 27

Page 22: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Result

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content in %(w)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Dep

th o

f pen

etra

tion

[mm

](Soil type: Sand) at

i= 0o (Nadir)

Dobson empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)Hallikainen empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 16 / 27

Page 23: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Result

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content in %(w)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Dep

th o

f pen

etra

tion

[mm

](Soil type: Loam) at

i= 0o (Nadir)

Dobson empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)Hallikainen empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 17 / 27

Page 24: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Result

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content in %(w)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Dep

th o

f pen

etra

tion

[mm

](Soil type: Clay) at

i= 0o (Nadir)

Dobson empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)Hallikainen empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.4 GHz)

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 18 / 27

Page 25: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Result: sensitivity to soil composition?

We can observe different penetration depth for different soil type andDobson semi-empirical estimated penetration depth varies a lot with soiltexture followed by Hallikainen empirical and least variation in Dobsonempirical estimated penetration depth. [For w = 0%]

Dobson empirical model

ε = a0 + (a1 + b1S + c1C )w+(a2 + b2S + c2C )w2

+(a3 + b3S + c3C )w3

Hallikainen empirical model

ε = (a0 + a1S + a2C )+(b0 + b1S + b2C )w+(c0 + c1S + c2C )w2

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 19 / 27

Page 26: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Estimation of penetration depth of NISAR sensors

NISAR PARAMETERS

Parameters NISAR Hallikainen Dobson semi-empirical

L-Band 1.25 GHz 1.4 GHz 1.25 GHzS-Band 3.22 GHz 4 GHz 3.22 GHzIncidence 33o − 47o – –

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 20 / 27

Page 27: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Estimation of penetration depth of NISAR sensors

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content in %(w)

0

50

100

150

Dep

th o

f pen

etra

tion

[mm

](Soil type: Sand) at Off Nadir

Dobson Semi-empirical for S Band (3.22 GHz) @ 33o

Dobson Semi-empirical for S Band (3.22 GHz) @ 47o

Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.25 GHz) @ 33o

Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.25 GHz) @ 47o

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 21 / 27

Page 28: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Estimation of penetration depth of NISAR sensors

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content in %(w)

0

50

100

150

Dep

th o

f pen

etra

tion

[mm

](Soil type: Loam) at Off Nadir

Dobson Semi-empirical for S Band (3.22 GHz) @ 33o

Dobson Semi-empirical for S Band (3.22 GHz) @ 47o

Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.25 GHz) @ 33o

Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.25 GHz) @ 47o

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 22 / 27

Page 29: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Estimation of penetration depth of NISAR sensors

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Volumetric Water Content in %(w)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Dep

th o

f pen

etra

tion

[mm

](Soil type: Clay) at Off Nadir

Dobson Semi-empirical for S Band (3.22 GHz) @ 33o

Dobson Semi-empirical for S Band (3.22 GHz) @ 47o

Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.25 GHz) @ 33o

Dobson Semi-empirical for L Band (1.25 GHz) @ 47o

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 23 / 27

Page 30: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Conclusion

This study will give us approximate depth at which one should collectthe in-situ measurements.

All the models (Dobson empirical, Hallikainen empirical and Dobsonsemi-empirical models) are inconsistent, they yield differentpenetration depth for same set of parameters.

Dobson semi-empirical estimated penetration depth varies a lot withsoil texture followed by Hallikainen empirical and least variation inDobson empirical estimated penetration depth.

The penetration depth decreases significantly for first 10% increase inthe soil moisture content, however, further increase in the soilmoisture has a reduced effect on penetration depth.

The penetration depth of the SAR signals decreases with increase inthe soil moisture content, incident angle and frequency.

The depth of penetration is more in L-band SAR signals as comparedto the S-band SAR signals.

Empirical models are site specific and valid for discrete sets of freq.Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 24 / 27

Page 31: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the NASA-ISRO Synthetic ApertureRadar (NISAR) mission through grant Hyd-01.

We would like to acknowledge IISER Bhopal and IIRSDehradun for all the necessary institutional support.

AS would like to thank to Department of Science andTechnology, Govt. of India for providing research fellowship asDST-INSPIRE fellow.

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 25 / 27

Page 32: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

References

A Falk (2018)

NASA-ISRO SAR mission science users handbook

Hallikainen, M. T., Ulaby, F. T., Dobson, M. C., El-Rayes, M. A. and Wu, L.-K.(1985)

Microwave dielectric behavior of wet soil- part 1: Empirical models andexperimental observations.

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (1) pp. 2534.

Dobson, M. C., Kouyate, F. and Ulaby, F. T. (1984)

A reexamination of soil textural effects on microwave emission and backscattering

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (6) pp. 530536.

Singh, Abhilash, Meena, Ganesh Kumar, Kumar, Shashi, Gaurav, Kumar (2018)

Analysis of the effect of incidence angle and moisture content on the penetrationdepth of l- and s-band sar signals into the ground surface.

doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-197-2018

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 26 / 27

Page 33: - Comparison of dielectric models and evaluation of the ... · SEE PROFILE Shashi Kumar Indian Instit ute of Remote Sensing (IIRS), Dehradun, India 94 PUBLICA TIONS164 CITA SEE PROFILE

https://in.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/68987-penetration-depth-evaluation-at-l-and-s-band-sar-signalsThank you for your kind attention !

Abhilash Singh ([email protected]) ( Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, ISRO, Dehradun Presented by: Abhilash Singh, DST-INSPIRE Fellow )URSI Asia Pacific-Radio Science Conference 09-15 March 2019 27 / 27View publication statsView publication stats