comparing safe, kiss and nvca term sheets

6
May Be Hazardous to Your Returns

Upload: archersan

Post on 15-Apr-2017

29 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparing SAFE, KISS and NVCA Term Sheets

May Be Hazardous to Your Returns

Page 2: Comparing SAFE, KISS and NVCA Term Sheets

WARNING

Page 3: Comparing SAFE, KISS and NVCA Term Sheets

Background

Page 4: Comparing SAFE, KISS and NVCA Term Sheets

SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity)

KISS (Keep It Simple Security) NVCA Term Sheet

Created Y Combinator (Carolynn Levy, 2013) 500 Startups (Gunderson Dettmer, 2014) National Venture Capital Assoc.(When dinosaurs roamed the earth)

Structure q A promise to exchange currently invested $$ for equity at future financing ($250K minimum) or change of control or IPO

q Convertible instrument with cap and/or discount, OR Most Favored Nation without a cap or discount

q Cash returned (prorata) to all SAFE investors in event of dissolution or liquidity event

q No maturity dateq Not treated as debt obligationq Conversion at 250K equity round

q A promise to exchange currently invested $$ for equity in the event of future financing including mechanisms to protect investors if financing does not happen. Two forms exist:

q Convertible debt with cap and/or discount. 5% interest.

q Convertible equity (just like convertible debt but with no interest).

q 18 month maturityq Converts at $1M future equity roundq Mechanisms exist for conversion if no

equity round occursq $50K investors granted information

and participation rightsq Most Favored Nation

q A standard, priced equity round enumerating valuation and investor rights and protections

q Usually includes some or all of these:

q Liquidation preferencesq Dividendq Stock option poolq Future investment rights,

voting rights, Board rights, information rights

q Control provisions

Best for q Very small deals or insider bridge rounds

q Equity sellers’ market

q Very small deals or insider bridge rounds

q Equity sellers’ market

q Later/larger seed or Series A sized deals

q Equity buyers’ market

Page 5: Comparing SAFE, KISS and NVCA Term Sheets

SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity)

KISS (Keep It Simple Security) NVCA

Rationale & CompanyBenefits

q Incubator-funded companies receive too little capital for more than basic legal fees

q Low cost & fastq Defer valuation negotiationq No debt on balance sheetq Since SAFE is not a debt,

reduces insolvency risk if investment is never repaid and never converts to equity

q Incubator-funded companies receive too little capital for more than basic legal fees

q Low cost & fastq Defer valuation negotiationq Restore investor/company

balance lost with SAFE

q Comprehensive agreement with (sometimes) clear statements describing future outcomes across different contingencies and the rights of different classes of shareholders and stakeholders

q Be perceived as a more mature company

Angel Benefits

q Attract startups to Angel group

q Minimize complexity of very small deals

q Enables conversion to equity in absence of future financing

q Attracts startups while protecting Angels

q Minimize complexity of very small deals

q The way the grown up world works

q Strong investor protections including control rights

q Comprehensive, deals with most common contingencies

Page 6: Comparing SAFE, KISS and NVCA Term Sheets

SAFE (SimpleAgreement for Future

Equity)

KISS (Keep It Simple Security)

NVCA

Negatives for Angels

q Lacks investor protectionsq No liquidation preferencesq Unclear recourse if note not

repaid or converted to equityq No control provisionsq If SAFE lacks a cap, investors

may be screwed

q Stronger but still only moderate investor protections

q No liquidation preferencesq No control provisionsq If KISS lacks a cap, investors may

be screwed

q May make angel groups less competitive than organizations willing to use SAFE or KISS

Negatives for management

q As a Cap is an implied valuation, it may require negotiation

q If price at conversion < Cap, can be an implied down-round, a big negative

q Gives management false sense that they don’t really need venture lawyers quite yet

q As a Cap is an implied valuation, it may require negotiation

q If price at conversion < Cap, can be an implied down-round, a big negative

q Gives management false sense that they don’t really need venture lawyers quite yet

q Insolvency risk from maturity date—and investors can force new terms

q Weighted towards investorsq Forces valuation negotiationq More time consumingq More complicated & costlyq Management may not really

understand future impactq Can create a risk of future

insolvency–and investors can demand new terms when “Sword of Damocles” mandatory redemption date approaches