comparative education week 22 comparative sociology
TRANSCRIPT
Comparative Education
Week 22
Comparative Sociology
Recap
• Last week we considered who can be a citizen
• Previously we looked at health and welfare
• Look at how systems can perpetuate inequalities
Outline
• Role of the state in education
• Inequality in the UK
• Inequality in the US
Ideas about Education
• Education for all gradually expanded on the 20th century
• Article 28• 1. ‘States Parties recognize the right of the
child to education and with a view to achieving this right progressively and on the basis of equal opportunity….’
Ideas about Education
• Education for individual gain?
• Education to benefit society or the economy?
• Education as social justice?
• Think about these 3 ideas• Education for individual gain • Education to benefit society or the economy • Education as social justice
• How do they fit with the way you think about education, or the way you think it operates?
Development of UK Education Policy
• 1944 Education Act– Raised school leaving age to 15– Universal free education– Three types of school
• grammar, • secondary modern • technical.
– Entry decided by test (11+ exam)
1944 Education Act
• Act primarily concerned with class inequalities– Working class children same chance to gain
qualifications
• Use education to develop the workforce– Education seen as an investment in economic
growth
Gender inequalities
• Young people were educate on gendered lines for their ‘future role in life’
Continuing inequalities
• The 11+ exam did allow some working-class children into grammar schools
• But class divides persisted – Working-class secondary modern– Middle-class grammar
• Change to comprehensives
11+ Failure
• Why do you think that the 11+ continued rather than ended educational inequalities?
Equal Opportunities?
• Does equality mean treating people the same?
• Can you treat people differently in the name of equal opportunities?
Equal Opportunities?
• Fred• Parents income £50,000 pa (both lawyers) • Fred has own room with a PC • Home contains many books and toys• The family goes to visit places of interest a lot and have two
overseas holidays a year
• George• Parents income £11,000 pa (both cleaners)• George shares room with two brothers• No computer nor many books or toys• Only trips are with school, and George has never been
overseas
• If education policy treats them the same, is that fair?
UK policy
• UK education policy is now concerned with standards
• Standards are to be raised through ‘market-forces’– SATS– League tables– Closure of failing schools
Market-forces
• Middle-class parents are better able to take advantage of the education market– Economic capital
• Living or moving to ‘good’ catchment areas
– Cultural capital• Confidence and knowledge of educational system
to access ‘best’ schools
• Prioritising parental choice does not ensure equal opportunities
Middle-class advantage
• Do you think that market-forces should play a role in education?
• To what extent is the continuing advantage of the middle-classes a problem?
US Policy
• Like the UK, the US has also been concerned for many years about falling school standards
• In 2002, the ‘No Child Left Behind Act’ was made law
No Child Left Behind
• Idea of the Act is to raise standards across public schools
• No excuses for certain subgroups of students
• Many objections raised by educationalists
Working of the Act
• Each school has to test its pupils annually in Grades 3-8 with additional tests in years 10 and 12 (UK school years 4-9, 11 & 13)
• Schools and school districts must demonstrate Annual Yearly Progress towards standards
• Sanctions will apply schools fail
Objections
• As in the UK, schools and educational achievement are linked to social class
• Few extra resources to help students from poorer backgrounds achieve more
• Risk that schools/students from poorer areas will disproportionally be labelled as failing
• Children with disabilities are also counted within the figures, even though many would never be able to achieve the standards
Penalty for failure
• Failure could result in – loss of funding – changing staff – Schools being taken over (Charter schools)
• Children at failing schools can elect to go to a different school – may have to travel long distances– pressure on places will be extreme
No Child Left Behind
• Critics argue that the NCLB Act was designed to undermine the public school sector and encourage privatisation. Do you agree?
Summary
• Education policy can be seen to link to wider ideas in society
• Ideas about the way in which inequalities can be addressed change over time.
• Studies consistently show that children from poorer families are more to attend ‘worse’ schools