comparative criminal justice systems an international perspective on policing reichel / dammer and...

14
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Upload: willa-stewart

Post on 20-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Comparative Criminal Justice

Systems

AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVEON POLICING

Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Page 2: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Policing

“Policing is no longer a local community service provided by local agencies

addressing local problems.”(Dammer and Fairchild, 2006)

Page 3: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Question

How will globalization affect the way police agencies (worldwide) perform their job?

Are populations static?

In times of change, what issues

must the police be aware of?

(content, context, time)

Page 4: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

The Changing Role of Police

Multi-jurisdictional

Multi-cultural

Multi-political

Multi-technical

Page 5: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Question

In times of civil tension and

the concern for public order -

how should officer discretion

be controlled in a democratic society?

Page 6: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Types of Police Structures

Centralized

Single: Ireland, Israel, Nigeria, Poland, Saudi Arabia

Multiple Coordinated: Austria, France, England/Wales

Multiple Uncoordinated: Belgium, Italy, Spain, Switzerland

Decentralized

Single: Japan

Multiple Coordinated: Australia, Canada, Germany

Multiple Uncoordinated: Mexico, United States

Page 7: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Policing – Global Cooperation

Interpol (International Criminal Police Organization); Lyons, France.

Europol (European Police Organization); The Hague, the Netherlands.

The Amsterdam Treaty/Schengen Agreement

European Arrest Warrant (Euro-warrant)

Page 8: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Interpol Two governing bodies: the General Assembly and the

Executive Committee.

183 members, each with their own National Central Bureau (NCB) – a global conduit for communication and data sharing.

NCB’s created because of difference in police forces, languages, and legal systems.

Major role is to supply transnational crime information to national police forces.

Interpol is not based on an international treaty or convention; it is not an international police force, it does not investigate crime.

Page 9: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

NCB Responsibilities*

1. Maintain open channels to all police units in its own country.

2. Maintain connections with the NCBs of all other member countries.

3. Maintain liaison with the General Secretariat.

Page 10: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Europol Operates under a mandate for preventing and combating

“organized” criminal activities operating in several countries.

Its efforts are directed against crimes such as drug trafficking, illicit vehicle trafficking, trafficking in human beings, terrorism, and money laundering.

It has no police authority across the EU.

Its role is to facilitate the exchange of both personal and nonpersonal data among Europol liaison officers who represent the various law enforcement agencies.

Page 11: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

The Schengen Convention

13 European countries. The creation of a single external border which abolished internal border checks. A common visa program among member countries.

Exhibits coordination among police, customs, and judiciary officials in each country. Accentuates cross-border surveillance (customs), hot pursuit (police), and extraditions (judiciary).

Member countries have a common data base.

Page 12: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Euro-Warrant

An example of harmonization and approximation in the EU.

The objective is to replace lengthy extradition procedures.

Two key aspects include: Abolishment of the principle of dual criminality for 32 serious offenses; the requirement of the surrender of a country’s own nationals.

Page 13: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Questions

Do you feel that the concepts of community policing, zero-tolerance policing,

and proactive policing will have an effect on the

global community in the near future?If so, in what way?

Will heterogeneity have an affect?

Page 14: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

Civil Order Control*(Six Model Nations)

England: Depends on regular street police although little attention is paid to civil order control forces.

France: Specialized troops in both the national police and the military (not always accountable to the public).

Germany: Youngest officers do civil order control work; mature officers focus on street work.

Japan: Specialized civil order police in each prefecture.

China: Public security police with assistance from the army.

Saudi Arabia: Relies on the military to handle serious civil disorder.

* Generally, the “front line” responsibility for civil order, as for deviance control, rests with the street police.