community health assessmentassets.thehcn.net/content/sites/dallasfortworth/grand...percent without...
TRANSCRIPT
Community Health
Assessment Grand Prairie Service
Area
Health Outcomes
Mortality
Years of Potential Life Lost
Infant Mortality
Very Low Birth Weight Births
Morbidity
Health Factors
Health Risk Behaviors
Violence and Injury Prevention
Injury Mortality
ED Visits for Injuries
High Risk Sexual Behavior HIV/STD Rates
Teen Birth Rate
Alcohol Use Liquor Store Density
Access to Clinical Care
Percent Uninsured
Physician-to-Population Ratio
Emergency Department Use
Quality of Clinical Care
Prevention Quality Indicators
Organizational Model For the
Community Health Dashboard
Demographic Profile Grand Prairie Service Area
• The population of the Grand Prairie Dallas Service
Area is much younger than the county population
with only 7.5% of the population age 65 or older,
compared to 9.3% for the county overall.
• The largest race/ethnic group in the Service Area
population is Hispanics, comprising 46.2% of the
population.
• Grand Prairie has a similar proportion of people
with a high school diploma or more (77.9%)
compared with Dallas County as a whole (77.1%).
2
43,398 773,700
37,255 564,260
82,750 1,009,548
15,575 179,552
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grand Prairie SA Dallas County
Other Non-Hispanic
Hispanic
Black Non-Hispanic
White Non-Hispanic
45,572 630,531
78,932 1,191,372
40,973 631,857
13,501 252,278
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grand Prairie SA Dallas County
65+
45-64
15-44
0-14
Age
Race/
Ethnicity
23,636 363,183
30,665 368,596
52,745 855,342
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grand Prairie SA Dallas County
More than HS
HS Diploma
Less than HS
Highest
Educational
Attainment
Source: Nielson/Claritas Pop-Facts 2013 version
Demographic Profile Grand Prairie Service Area
• The Grand Prairie Area has a slightly lower
percentage of families in poverty (13.1%) than
the Dallas County-wide rate (15.1%).
• The Service Area’s per capita income was the
sixth lowest of the 13 service areas.
• This Service Area’s percent unemployed is
ranked 5th out of the 13 service areas.
3
37,557 504,918
5,669 89,788
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grand Prairie SA Dallas County
below poverty
above poverty
Poverty
Status
(Families)
$19,560
$24,858
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
Grand Prairie SA Dallas County
PerCapitaIncome
Source: Nielson/Claritas Pop-Facts 2013 version
8.4% 9.5%
10.0% 10.9%
7.0% 8.4%
6.5% 7.5%
15.9%
11.2%
10.1% 8.9%
7.1%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Percent Unemployed in the Civilian Labor Force
Access to care
Access to Clinical Care
Percent Uninsured
Physician-to-Population Ratio
Emergency Department Use
Access to Healthcare: Percent Without
Healthcare Insurance Grand Prairie Service Area
5
10%
18% 19%
21%
18% 22%
10%
11%
43%
28%
33%
24%
19% 22%
23%
8%
15% 18%
18%
17% 19%
9% 9%
44%
27%
31%
20% 17%
31% 28%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er/
Hu
tch
/Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s 1
1
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er/
Hu
tch
/Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Percent Uninsured
2012 2006
Source: 2006 Solucient, Inc.; 2012 Truven Analytics, Inc. Denominator population data from Claritas, Inc.; Texas rate
from US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 2011
Healthy People 2020 Goal – 0% uninsured
17.9%
18.0%
17.6%
18.0%
18.4%
20.6%
20.8%
18.5%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0%
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
Percent Without Health
Insurance, Grand Prairie
Service Area
Access to Healthcare: Primary Care
Physician-to-Population Ratio Grand Prairie Service Area
6
2012 2004
38.4
21.1
21.2
13.0
23.5
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Primary Care Physician-to-
Population Ratio, per 100,000,
Grand Prairie Service Area
Source: Texas Medical Association Physician Practice Address files; denominator population data from
Claritas, Inc., except 2010 from Nielson/Claritas, Inc. Pop Facts. Mid 2010 version.
County and State source is Texas Bureau of Primary Care.
39.5 49.9
23.5
49.6
223.6
106.2
131.1
67.6 44.7
41.0 41.3
142.6
8.5
83.4
69.5
23.1
66.1
38.4
54.4
120.9 112.6
71.3 59.8
40.3
55.6 57.1
134.4
9.3
79.2 68.1
0
50
100
150
200
250
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Primary Care Physicians per 100,000
Access to Healthcare: Non-
Emergent ED Utilization Grand Prairie Service Area
7
51.2
56.2
63.8
64.6
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
2009
2010
2011
2012
Rate of Non-Emergent ED
Visits, per 1,000, Grand
Prairie Service Area
61.6
77.6
64.6
94.0
53.5
108.5
49.5
55.1
154.3
102.5
94.2
73.2 68.9
82.6
20.4 19.7
23.2 33.5
17.1
38.9
15.8 17.6
53.7
36.5 31.1
19.8
29.1
34.7
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Non-Emergent ED Visits, per 1,000 Population
2012 2006
Source: DFWHC, Outpatient Data System; NYU Algorithm for determining appropriate Emergency Dept. Use;
denominator population data from Claritas, Inc.
Access to Care
Access to Clinical Care
Percent Uninsured
Physician-to-Population Ratio
Emergency Department Use
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Healthy
People 2020
Goal
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Other Service
Areas
(Quartiles)
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Past Years’
Data (CI)
N/A
N/A
– Doing better than the benchmark
– Same as/not significantly different from the benchmark
– Worse than the benchmark
Quality of care
Quality of Clinical Care
Prevention Quality
Indicators
Diabetes-Related
Cardiovascular
Acute/Infectious
Chronic Pulmonary
Healthcare Quality: Rate of Preventable
Hospitalizations, 2011
Diabetes-Related Hospitalizations Grand Prairie Service Area
10
64.1 72.9
59.4 59.9
38.5
79.6
39.1 45.5
129.7
104.6
73.3 49.0
64.8 67.9
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
Diabetes Short Term Complications, 2011
135.4 140.4
109.9
134.9
71.2
153.0 74.6
71.3
226.6 196.8
193.0
131.1 142.7
134.0
0.050.0
100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0
Diabetes Long Term Complications, 2011
9.3
20.9
14.2 15.5
7.2 15.2
5.8 6.6
35.0
20.1
29.2
12.2
21.3 15.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Uncontrolled Diabetes, 2011
19.6 18.6
15.5
24.8
5.7 14.9
6.3 7.5
36.3
19.4
25.5
8.3 12.7 15.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Lower Extremity Amputation Among Diabetics, 2011
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Health Care Information Council, unpublished data;
denominator population data from US Census American Community Survey
Healthcare Quality: Rate of Preventable
Hospitalizations, 2011
Cardiovascular Disease Hospitalizations Grand Prairie Service Area
11
199.5
330.3 282.8
204.0 179.1
240.7
181.6 190.2
495.6
328.0 304.8
211.3
339.4
263.4
0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0600.0
Congestive Heart Failure, 2011
53.3
79.4 64.7
50.6 36.5
48.1 44.1 43.2
145.7
80.1 72.6
43.4 54.7
62.4
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
Hypertension, 2011
3.3 4.4
3.5
6.7
4.4 5.7
2.6
5.4
3.3
7.7
2.8 1.8
4.3 4.6
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Angina Without Cardiac Procedure, 2011
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Health Care Information Council, unpublished data;
denominator population data from US Census American Community Survey
Healthcare Quality: Rate of Preventable
Hospitalizations, 2011
Acute/Infectious Disease Hospitalizations Grand Prairie Service Area
12
187.5
179.6 210.9
220.6
143.7
211.3
144.6 159.6
184.1 206.3
172.7
154.5
252.7
181.7
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
Bacterial Pneumonia, 2011
138.6 105.8
70.4 95.0
61.9 75.3
78.4
72.9
105.0
84.9 108.6
81.7
102.9 85.4
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
Dehydration, 2011
124.2 138.8
164.5 170.0
114.9
197.4
141.4 147.9
150.7
153.1
167.4 127.6
119.3 149.2
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
Urinary Tract Infection, 2011
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Health Care Information Council, unpublished data;
denominator population data from US Census American Community Survey
Healthcare Quality: Rate of Preventable
Hospitalizations, 2011
Chronic Pulmonary Disease Hospitalizations Grand Prairie Service Area
13
120.6 198.1
200.7 250.9
111.2 198.2
121.5
181.0
312.8 300.7
174.2 124.0
399.0
201.4
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Adults Ages 40+, 2011
7.7
34.4
11.4 9.9
11.4 11.2
8.2 10.3
29.3 18.8
11.4 4.2
7.9 13.2
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0
Adult Asthma, Adults Under Age 40, 2011
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Health Care Information Council, unpublished data;
denominator population data from US Census American Community Survey
Healthcare Quality Grand Prairie
Compared to
12 Other
Service
Areas
(Quartiles)
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Past Years’
Data (Percent
Change vs.
2010)
– Doing better than the benchmark
– Same as/not significantly different from the benchmark
– Worse than the benchmark
Quality of
Clinical Care
Prevention Quality
Indicators
Diabetes ST Comp
Diabetes LT Comp
Uncontrolled Diabetes
Lower Extremity Amputations Among Diabetics
Congestive Heart Failure
Hypertension
Angina Without Cardiac Procedure
Bacterial Pneumonia
Dehydration
Urinary Tract Infection
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Adult Asthma
Health Risk
Behaviors
Health Risk Behaviors
Injury Prevention
Mortality
ED Use
High Risk Sexual Behavior
HIV/STD’s
Teen Birth Rate
Alcohol Use Liquor Store Density
Risk Factors: Auto Accident
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
16
Auto Accident Mortality Rate,
Age-Adjusted Death Rate per
100,000, Grand Prairie Service
Area
26.5
11.1
8.5 7.2
6.5
10.6
5.3 5.1
12.9 11.7
6.2 6.4
2.8
8.4
14.1
12.3
15.5
11.4
8.0
11.1
9.0
12.6
11.4
16.2 16.2
18.7
20.9
14.4
17.1
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 12.4
15.5
10.2
9.1
12.6
9.9
3.5
8.8
8.5
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Risk Factors: Accidental Poisoning
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
17
Accidental Poisoning Mortality
Rate, Age-Adjusted Death Rate
per 100,000, Grand Prairie
Service Area
3.4
5.9
4.2
5.7
11.4
9.9
6.8
7.9
9.0
13.2
9.2
13.5
5.7
9.1
1.3
7.5
5.5 5.9
5.1
2.3
4.5
5.9
13.2
8.6
4.3
6.1
7.8
6.4 6.6
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 11.1
5.5
4.0
3.5
6.7
1.9
2.8
2.9
4.2
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Risk Factors: Accidental Falls
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
18
Accidental Falls Mortality Rate,
Age-Adjusted Death Rate per
100,000, Grand Prairie Service
Area
13.0
9.0
4.7
5.2
8.8 9.4
6.7
7.9
3.4
4.9
4.5
3.3
6.1
6.5
0.0
6.6
4.9
8.4
6.2
9.9
2.5
7.7
3.2 3.6
4.9
6.8
8.9
6.6 6.5
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2005
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 7.0
4.9
5.2
4.3
4.7
3.5
5.5
4.7
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Risk Factors: Falls Death Rates
Among Seniors Grand Prairie Service Area
19
33.9
20.5
19.3
26.5
24.8
34.9
25.8
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Falls fatality rates, ages 65+,
per 100,000, Grand Prairie
Service Area 69.3
74.2
25.8
42.0
61.4
60.8
48.7
57.3
10.2
31.6
32.7
29.1
43.8 43.9
0.0
42.6
33.9
43.7 47.9
61.5
15.0
49.6
17.4 20.2
38.8
48.7
55.6
42.4 42.1
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Falls Deaths Age 65+
2011 2005
Healthy People 2020 Goal 45.3
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics, unpublished data; denominator population data
from US Census Bureau American Community Survey. 2005 Dallas County data from Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Multiple Cause of Death File 2005-2006. CDC WONDER On-line Database,
compiled from Multiple Cause of Death File 2005-2006Series 20 No. 2L, 2012. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10.html
on Mar 25, 2010 2:52:15 PM; 2005 Texas data from http://soupfin.tdh.state.tx.us/
Risk Factors: Rate of Injury-
Related ED Visits Grand Prairie Service Area
20
Rate of Injury-Related ED
Visits, per 1,000, Grand
Prairie Service Area
59.1
64.3
61.4
80.2
48.0
78.7
49.7
58.1
97.0
72.8
62.6
44.8
58.6
64.4
45.8
35.3
56.8
74.3
42.7
63.6
37.1 38.1
73.6
64.4
53.0
36.8
65.3
53.6
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Rate of Injury-Related ED Visits
2012 2006
56.8
53.7
46.2
50.3
52.4
61.2
61.4
0.0 25.0 50.0 75.0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: DFWHC ERF Information Quality Services Center Regional Data, 2012. Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council
Education and Research Foundation, Information and Quality Services Center, Irving, Texas. July 2013.
Denominator population data from Claritas, Inc.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 73.3
Risk Factors: Suicide
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
21
Suicide Mortality Rate, Age-
Adjusted Death Rate per 100,000,
Grand Prairie Service Area 15.4 15.3
8.5
7.2
13.4
11.3
10.6
6.9
2.5
7.6
4.2
13.7
10.8
9.3 8.3
6.5
9.7 11.0
14.1
5.7
15.1
7.0 7.1 7.7
5.3
6.7
8.6
9.5 10.6
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 10.2
9.7
7.6
2.8
8.1
3.2
5.5
5.9
8.5
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Risk Factors: Homicide
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
22
Homicide Mortality Rate, Age-
Adjusted Death Rate per 100,000,
Grand Prairie Service Area
1.4
14.7
6.2
4.7
2.7
5.1
3.8
2.9
16.5
12.6 11.1
3.9
2.6
6.7 7.0 8.6 9.3
6.3 7.1 6.2
2.8
4.5
40.4
14.7
20.0
7.2
4.9
11.3
6.1
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 5.5
9.3
8.4
2.6
5.2
5.9
3.3
1.1
6.7
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Risk Factors: High Risk Sexual Behavior, Sexually
Transmitted Disease Incidence Rates, 2011 Grand Prairie Service Area
23
644.3 853.0
471.3
587.5
451.5
558.3 342.1
254.2
1,422.4
810.6 773.4
950.5
493.7 648.3
417.4
-
500.0
1,000.0
1,500.0
2,000.0
Chlamydia Incidence per 100,000
215.2
273.5
108.0 121.0
141.7
163.5
83.2 76.8
546.1
267.6
197.0
292.4
128.7
198.0
115.7
- 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0
Gonorrhea Incidence per 100,000
7.8 5.4 4.1
2.9 4.1
6.5 4.3
3.1
15.3
6.4 9.1
14.5
1.5
6.6 6.6
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Primary & Secondary Syphilis Incidence per 100,000
23.5 25.1
11.7 17.4
40.4 31.9
26.5 16.5
62.3
29.1 30.3
92.1
23.9 34.8
17.5
-
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
New HIV Incidence per 100,000
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of STD/HIV, unpublished data; denominator population data from Claritas, Inc.; Dallas
County and Texas Rates are from http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/hivstd/reports/STD2011.pdf and http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/hivstd/reports/HIV2011.pdf
Risk Factors: High Risk Sexual
Behavior, Teen Birth Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
24
Teen Births, Rate Per 1,000 Girls
Ages 15-17, Grand Prairie
Service Area
18.1 16.5
22.1
38.7
15.9
34.3
15.9
13.7
47.3
40.4
45.8
32.5
29.5
30.3
20.1
24.3
36.5
57.5
31.4
44.4
19.0 16.6
67.8
47.6
62.7
55.1
35.7
42.0
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Teen Birth Rate
2011 2005
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data
Nielson/Claritas mid 2011 Pop Facts
36.5
40.6
32.9
30.3
32.3
24.9
22.1
0.0 25.0 50.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Healthy People 2020 Goal 36.2
Risk Factors: Liquor Store
Density, 2011 Grand Prairie Service Area
25
1.3 2.4
1.8
6.3
12.3 8.9
8.8
3.1
20.8
5.9 3.8
33.4
4.2
9.0 6.9
2.8
0.0 2.0
0.0
14.7
8.9 8.7
4.0
14.2
10.4
1.9
48.6
0.0
9.3 7.1
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Liquor Stores Per 100,000, 2011
Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 County Business Patterns; denominator population data from US Census Bureau; 2007 from US Census
Bureau, 2007 Economic Census; denominator population data from Claritas, Inc.; Dallas County and State of Texas data from US Census
Bureau, NIACS annual business estimates
7.2
7.4
6.9
7.1
7.0
6.9
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011
Liquor Store Density, Stores per
100,000, State of Texas
2011 2007
Health Risk Behaviors
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Healthy
People
2020 Goal
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Other Service
Areas
(Quartiles)
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Past
Years’
Data (CI)
– Doing better than the benchmark
– Same as/not significantly different from the benchmark
– Worse than the benchmark
Health Risk
Behaviors
Injury Prevention
Motor Vehicle Crash Death Rate
Accidental Poisoning Death Rate
Accidental Falls Death Rate
Senior Falls Death Rate
Suicide Death Rate
Homicide Death Rate
Emergency Department Injury Visits
Health Risk Behaviors
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Healthy
People
2020 Goal
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Other Service
Areas
(Quartiles)
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Past
Years’ Data
(CI)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
– Doing better than the benchmark
– Same as/not significantly different from the benchmark
– Worse than the benchmark
Health Risk
Behaviors
High Risk Sexual
Behavior
Teen Birth Rate
Chlamydia Incidence Rate
Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
Syphilis Incidence Rate
HIV Incidence Rate
Alcohol Use
Liquor Store Density
Health Outcomes
Mortality
Heart Disease
Cancer
Cerebrovascular Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Diabetes Mellitus
Years of Potential Life
Lost
Infant Mortality
Low Birth Weight Births
Communicable Disease Morbidity
Aseptic Meningitis
Cryptosporidiosis
Pertussis
Salmonellosis
Health Outcomes
Health Outcomes: Heart Disease
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
29
Heart Disease Mortality Rate, Age-
Adjusted Death Rate per 100,000,
Grand Prairie Service Area
227.4
220.8
139.2
187.9
150.4
194.0
142.2 144.3
244.9
216.6
192.8
139.0
222.2
179.1
138.1
191.8
218.1
198.6
164.6
197.0
149.4
174.4
323.2
252.9 240.8
188.3
285.9
229.2
224.5
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey
Healthy People 2020 Goal 100.8
218.1
195.9
193.5
155.7
156.5
132.4
145.1
139.2
0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Health Outcomes: Cancer
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
30
Cancer Mortality Rate, Age-
Adjusted Death Rate per 100,000,
Grand Prairie Service Area
212.3 213.2
132.7
187.7
140.9
158.5
133.9
150.2
214.4
191.7
206.5
135.7
205.0
168.8 173.0
229.6
165.9
202.4
148.6
145.8
147.9
141.9
253.1
182.7
176.7
151.6
186.8 187.6
181.4
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey
Healthy People 2020 Goal 160.6
165.9
179.5
131.2
138.3
129.6
114.8
129.8
132.7
0.0 100.0 200.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Health Outcomes: Cerebrovascular
Disease Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
31
Cerebrovascular Disease
Mortality Rate, Age-Adjusted
Death Rate per 100,000, Grand
Prairie Service Area
60.6
37.1
30.5
44.0
44.5 44.0
44.5
33.7
52.9
44.3
48.1
44.5
32.9
43.2
80.5
64.1 66.1
62.8
48.2
57.7
46.0 43.5
80.5
58.8
65.0
43.8
87.7
63.0
56.2
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey
Healthy People 2020 Goal 33.8
66.1
36.1
57.9
32.0
45.7
33.6
37.3
30.5
0.0 25.0 50.0 75.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Health Outcomes: Chronic Obstructive
Pulmonary Disease Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
32
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary
Disease Mortality Rate, Age-
Adjusted Death Rate per 100,000,
Grand Prairie Service Area
61.2
52.2
34.9
49.8
29.9
44.0
33.4
36.3 36.1
48.4
33.6 34.0
89.9
39.9
58.9
33.6
47.2
36.4
27.2
41.6
35.2 31.2
27.9
44.6
30.0 26.9
72.6
38.9 41.7
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey
NOTE: No Healthy People 2020 goal
matches this metric.
47.2
25.9
26.1
38.6
38.2
28.7
33.5
34.9
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Health Outcomes: Diabetes
Mortality Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
33
Diabetes Mellitus Mortality Rate,
Age-Adjusted Death Rate per
100,000, Grand Prairie Service Area
32.3
24.8
16.7 18.7
12.9
20.6
13.0 13.1
40.5
26.1
32.6
13.4
29.8
20.9
37.0
23.5
19.0 16.8
10.9
18.4
17.8
12.6
36.6
26.2
32.4
16.3
32.7
22.9
29.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Te
xa
s
Age-Adjusted Deaths per 100,000
2011 2004
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics; denominator population data from US
Census American Community Survey
19.0
24.6
24.8
24.3
11.6
8.6
13.6
16.7
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
NOTE: No Healthy People 2020 goal
matches this metric.
Health Outcomes: Birth Outcomes,
Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Births Grand Prairie Service Area
34
Very Low Birth Weight Rate, Percent
of Births Below 1500 Grams at Birth,
Grand Prairie Service Area
2.1%
2.2%
1.9%
1.6%
1.1%
1.7%
1.8%
1.6%
2.4%
1.8%
1.5%
1.7%
2.2%
1.7%
2.4%
2.4%
1.8%
1.5%
1.7%
1.8%
1.2%
1.3%
2.4%
1.5%
1.7%
1.1%
1.3%
1.6% 1.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
Cedar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lanc
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Dalla
s
Oute
r N
E
South
Dalla
s
SE
Dalla
s
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hutc
h S
eag
Dalla
s C
ounty
Texas
Cedar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lanc
Gra
nd
Pra
irie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Dalla
s
Oute
r N
E
South
Dalla
s
SE
Dalla
s
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hutc
h S
eag
Dalla
s C
ounty
Texas
Teen Birth Rate
Healthy People 2020 Goal 1.4%
2011 2005
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics
1.8%
2.4%
1.6%
1.6%
1.9%
1.5%
1.9%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Health Outcomes: Birth Outcomes,
Infant Mortality Rate Grand Prairie Service Area
35
Infant Mortality Rate, Deaths
per 1,000 Live Births, Grand
Prairie Service Area
8.5
6.4
11.5
5.7
4.9
6.1 6.4
5.8
12.9
7.2 7.3
8.3 7.6
7.4 7.6
6.4 7.0
6.4
7.9
7.2
8.6
5.0 5.0
11.2
6.7
8.4
3.2
3.9
7.1
6.5
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
Cedar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lanc
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Dalla
s
Oute
r N
E
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Dalla
s
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
ons C
orr
Wilm
er
Hutc
h S
eag
Dalla
s C
ounty
Texas (
2010
)
Cedar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lanc
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Dalla
s
Oute
r N
E
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
ons C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ounty
Texas
Infant Mortality Rate
Healthy People 2020 Goal 6.0
2011 2005
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics
6.4
9.4
8.0
6.0
6.4
11.0
11.5
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Health Outcomes: Years of Potential
Life Lost, All Causes Grand Prairie Service Area
36
5,733
5,163
6,150
4,713
4,324
4,389
5,350
0 2,500 5,000 7,500
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Years of Potential Life Lost
Rate*, per 100,000, Grand
Prairie Service Area
*Years of Potential Life Lost
Rate is defined as the rate of
deaths under age 75 per 100,000
population under age 75.
6,791
9,500
5,350
6,548
4,648
6,744
5,005
4,626
11,770
8,161
7,455
5,700
6,539
6,851
6,169
8,271
5,733
6,625
5,075
6,921
3,960
4,862
13,958
9,149
8,806
5,518
7,509 7,443
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Years of Potential Life Lost Rate per 100,000*
2011 2005
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Bureau of Vital Statistics;
Denominator population data from Claritas, Inc.
Health Outcomes: Estimated Diabetes Prevalence
Rates (Diagnosed and Undiagnosed) Grand Prairie Service Area
37
11.3%
12.6% 11.8% 11.7%
8.9%
11.6%
8.8% 9.2%
16.9%
13.2%
14.8%
12.2% 11.6% 11.8%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Ce
da
r H
ill
DeS
oto
Lanc
Gra
nd
Pra
irie
Irvin
g
No
rth
Dalla
s
NE
Da
llas
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
Sou
th D
alla
s
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
ons C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Da
llas C
oun
ty
Diabetes Prevalence, percent
Source: US Diabetes Index, National Minority Quality Forum and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012; based on NHANES
population prevalence estimates, 2010. Denominator population data 2010 from Nielson/Claritas, Inc. Pop Facts. Mid 2010 version
Health Outcomes: Reportable
Communicable Disease Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
38
20.91
14.08
9.52
4.37
2.38
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Aseptic Meningitis Incidence
Rate, per 100,000, Grand
Prairie Service Area
2009 2005
10.59
14.74
2.38
5.81
8.97
11.30 11.12
7.01
16.84
15.76
13.24
6.28 7.81
10.49
30.10
29.45
20.91
15.31 15.40
16.33
15.51
7.96
43.35
21.72
38.12
11.85
12.36
22.01
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Aseptic Meningitis Incidence, per 100,000
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Infectious Disease Control Unit, unpublished data; denominator population
data from Claritas, Inc.; 2005 Dallas County data from Dallas County Health and Human Services web site:
http://www.dallascounty.org/department/hhservices/services/communicable/documents/ReportableConditions2003-07Annual.pdf;
2005 Dallas County denominator population data from American Community Survey.
Health Outcomes: Reportable
Communicable Disease Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
39
1.61
0.70
0.68
13.10
1.19
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Cryptosporidiosis Incidence
Rate, per 100,000, Grand
Prairie Service Area
2009 2005
1.32
1.13 1.19
0.73
1.17
1.46
1.33
0.39
2.59
0.55
0.47
1.14
0.00
1.06
0.00 0.00
1.61
0.73
0.39
1.09
1.83
0.42
0.00
0.56 0.50
0.59
0.00
0.79
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Cryptosporidiosis Incidence, per 100,000
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Infectious Disease Control Unit, unpublished data; denominator population
data from Claritas, Inc.; 2005 Dallas County data from Dallas County Health and Human Services web site:
http://www.dallascounty.org/department/hhservices/services/communicable/documents/ReportableConditions2003-07Annual.pdf;
2005 Dallas County denominator population data from American Community Survey.
Health Outcomes: Reportable
Communicable Disease Rates
Grand Prairie Service Area
40
7.24
2.11
7.48
4.99
11.29
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Pertussis Incidence Rate, per
100,000, Grand Prairie Service
Area
2009 2005
5.30
4.54
11.29
10.17
6.63
6.20 5.78
6.23 6.48
7.19
8.98
5.14
3.12
6.94
4.30
6.40
7.24 7.29
7.50
7.26
5.93
12.15
6.37
10.44
12.87
11.85
5.30
9.40
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
Nort
h D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Da
llas
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Pertussis Incidence, per 100,000
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Infectious Disease Control Unit, unpublished data; denominator population data
from Claritas, Inc.; 2005 Dallas County data from Dallas County Health and Human Services web site:
http://www.dallascounty.org/department/hhservices/services/communicable/documents/ReportableConditions2003-07Annual.pdf;
2005 Dallas County denominator population data from American Community Survey.
Health Outcomes: Reportable
Communicable Disease Rates Grand Prairie Service Area
41
9.65
6.33
12.24
9.98
5.94
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Salmonellosis Incidence Rate,
per 100,000, Grand Prairie
Service Area
2009 2005
11.92
11.34
5.94
15.98
10.14
9.48 9.34
11.68
12.95
11.33
10.87
11.41
6.24
11.27
4.30
11.52
9.65 9.48
5.13
6.53
7.76
9.22
6.37
7.62 8.42
8.89 8.83
8.56
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Ced
ar
Hill
DeS
oto
Lan
c
Gra
nd P
rair
ie
Irvin
g
No
rth D
alla
s
NE
Dalla
s
NW
Da
llas
Ou
ter
NE
So
uth
Da
llas
SE
Da
llas
SW
Dalla
s
Ste
mm
on
s C
orr
Wilm
er
Hu
tch
Se
ag
Dalla
s C
ou
nty
Salmonellosis Incidence, per 100,000
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services, Infectious Disease Control Unit, unpublished data; denominator population
data from Claritas, Inc.; 2005 Dallas County data from Dallas County Health and Human Services web site:
http://www.dallascounty.org/department/hhservices/services/communicable/documents/ReportableConditions2003-07Annual.pdf;
2005 Dallas County denominator population data from American Community Survey.
Healthy People 2020 Goal 11.4
Health Outcomes
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Healthy
People 2020
Goal
Grand Prairie
Compared to
Other
Service
Areas
(Quartiles)
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Past
Years’ Data
(CI)
N/A
N/A
– Doing better than the benchmark
– Same as/not significantly different from the benchmark
– Worse than the benchmark
Health Outcomes
Mortality
Heart Disease Death Rate
Cancer Death Rate
Cerebrovascular Disease Death Rate
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Death Rate
Diabetes Death Rate
Health Outcomes
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Healthy
People
2020 Goal
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Other
Service
Areas
(Quartiles)
Grand
Prairie
Compared
to Past
Years’
Data (CI)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
– Doing better than the benchmark
– Same as/not significantly different from the benchmark
– Worse than the benchmark
Health Outcomes
Infant Mortality Rate
Very Low Birth Weight Birth Rate
Years of Potential Life Lost Rate
Communicable Disease Morbidity
Aseptic Meningitis Incidence Rate
Cryptosporidiosis Incidence Rate
Pertussis Incidence Rate
Salmonellosis Incidence Rate
Health Outcomes
Mortality
Years of Potential Life Lost
Infant Mortality
Very Low Birth Weight Births
Morbidity
Health Factors
Health Risk Behaviors
Violence and Injury Prevention
Injury Mortality
ED Visits for Injuries
High Risk Sexual Behavior HIV/STD Rates
Teen Birth Rate
Alcohol Use Liquor Store Density
Access to Clinical Care
Percent Uninsured
Physician-to-Population Ratio
Emergency Department Use
Quality of Clinical Care
Prevention Quality Indicators
Summary – Model With
Stoplight Pie Charts,
Grand Prairie Service Area
Deviations from the Dallas County mean
Outer Northeast
Northwest Dallas
North Dallas
Irving
Northeast Dallas
Grand Prairie
Wilmer Hutchins Seagoville
Stemmons Corridor
Cedar Hill
Southwest Dallas
DeSoto Lancaster
Southeast Dallas
South Dallas
Mortality VLBW High Risk Sexual BehaviorSocioeconomic YPLL MorbidityAccess to Clinical Care Infant Mortality Violence and InjuryPreventable Hospitalizations
Percent Difference from the Dallas County Average
More Unfavorable More Favorable
NOTE: All data are from the years
2009-2012, years available varies
by topic.
Each vertical line
represents 100%
difference from the
Dallas County average.
Methods of calculating deviations from the
Dallas County mean for the preceding chart
• Mortality. For each service area and for Dallas County, add the 2011 age-adjusted death rates per 100,000 for the five leading causes of death, to
get a single number. Calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas County total, from -infinity to +infinity. That deviation is
the mortality deviation for the chart. Because heart disease and cancer predominate, this tends to over-weight these two causes compared to the
other three (stroke, COPD and diabetes).
• Years of potential life lost. Using the Years of Potential Life Lost Rate per 100,000, calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the
Dallas County YPLL rate, from -infinity to +infinity. That deviation is the YPLL deviation for the chart.
• Infant Mortality. Using the Infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births, calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas County
infant mortality rate, from -infinity to +infinity. That deviation is the infant mortality deviation for the chart.
• Very Low Birth Weight. Using the Very Low Birth Weight rate per 1,000 live births, calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the
Dallas County VLBW rate, from -infinity to +infinity. That deviation is the VLBW deviation for the chart.
• Morbidity. For each service area and for Dallas County, add the 2009 incidence rates per 100,000 for the four reportable diseases (aseptic
meningitis, cryptosporidiosis, pertussis, salmonellosis), to get a single number. Calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the
Dallas County total, from -infinity to +infinity. That deviation is the morbidity deviation for the chart. Meningitis and salmonellosis are more
common, so this tends to over-weight them, although all are fairly rare in a population sense.
• Violence and Injury. Three steps:
For each service area and for Dallas County, add the 2011 age-adjusted death rates for the injury-related causes of death (motor vehicle crashes, poisoning, falls, suicide and homicide)
and the age-specific seniors falls death rate (all of which are in units of deaths per 100,000), to get a single number. Calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas
County total, from -infinity to +infinity.
Then using the rate per 100,000 of ED visits for injuries, calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas County rate, from -infinity to +infinity.
Calculate the arithmetic mean of these two percent deviations. That is the Violence and Injury deviation for the chart. This might over-weight ED visits somewhat, but it is qualitatively
different from mortality.
• High Risk Sexual Behavior. Three steps:
For each service area and for Dallas County, add the 2011 incidence rates for three non-HIV STDs (Chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis), to get a single number in
units of cases per 100,000. Calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas County total, from -infinity to +infinity.
Then using the rate of new HIV diagnoses per 100,000, calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas County rate, from -infinity to +infinity.
Then using the rate of births to girls 15-17, per population of girls 15-17, calculate for each service area the percent deviation from the Dallas County rate, from -
infinity to +infinity.
Calculate the arithmetic mean of these three percent deviations. That is the High Risk Sexual Behavior deviation for the chart. This might under-weight syphilis
somewhat. Each category is given an the equal statistical weight (STDs, HIV and teen births), since they are qualitatively quite different we probably can’t resolve
that to everyone’s satisfaction.
• Access to Clinical Care. For each service area and for Dallas County, add the 2011 percent of people without health insurance and
rate of non-emergent ED user per 1000 population, then subtract the rate of primary care physicians per 100,000 population (since
higher is better for this measure), to get a single number. Calculate for each service area the percent deviation of this total from
the Dallas County total, from -infinity to +infinity. That deviation is the access to care deviation for the chart. Although these three
measures are in different units, the values were in the range of 5-130 (in different units), such that the contributions of each of the
three measures to the total was approximately equal.
• Quality of Clinical Care. There are 12 preventable hospitalization discharge rates for each service area, age-adjusted in units of
discharges per 100,000. Some are more common, such as bacterial pneumonia (in the range of 100-400 discharges per 100,000),
while some are more rare (around 5-10 per 100,000). So for each service area and for Dallas County, for each discharge category
calculate the percent deviation from the Dallas County rate. Calculate the arithmetic average of these 12 deviations, that deviation
is the quality of care deviation for the chart.
• Socioeconomic indicators. There are four socioeconomic indicators—percent age 65 or older, percent age birth to 14, percent of
adults age 25+ without a high school diploma, percent of the population below the federal poverty limit. For each service area and
for Dallas County, for each of these four indicators calculate the percent deviation from the Dallas County rate. Calculate the
arithmetic average of these four deviations, that deviation is the socioeconomic deviation for the chart.
47
Methods of calculating deviations from the
Dallas County mean for the preceding chart
Notes:
• Age Adjusted Death Rates: Death rates that control for the effects in
population age distributions. The centers for Disease Control and Prevention
established the standard population weights for direct age adjustments. The
need for age adjustment becomes particularly important when cause-specific
mortality is of interest. Unadjusted rates for chronic diseases (cardiovascular
diseases, cancers, or chronic lower respiratory diseases) may appear to be
higher for older populations when compared to a younger population. With
age-adjustment those differences may be reduced or even reversed. A
mechanism for adjusting the age structure differences is needed to determine
if there really are mortality differences between two populations. By applying
age-specific mortality rates to a standard population, direct standardization
controls for differences in population composition. Mortality trends can be
more accurately compared along geographic, temporal, or race/ethnicity lines,
etc. In short, standardization lets us look at what the death rate would be in
one population if that population had the same age structure as the standard
population. Beginning with 1999 events, the United States year 2000
population is used as the standard for age-adjusting.