common core connections

15
Elizabeth Moeller ECI 545: Theory and Research in Literacy Common Core Connections

Upload: rhett

Post on 22-Feb-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Common Core Connections. Elizabeth Moeller ECI 545: Theory and Research in Literacy. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Common Core Connections

Elizabeth MoellerECI 545: Theory and Research in Literacy

Common Core Connections

Page 2: Common Core Connections

“There are a number of fantastic texts that are worth the work required to

understand them. It’s just that teachers should know why these

texts are complex, if they are appropriate for students in the

classroom, and how they might best be taught.”

Fisher, Frey, and Lapp, 2012, p.50

Introduction

Page 3: Common Core Connections

Background InformationLocation

Coopers Elementary SchoolNash County Public SchoolsHome of the Bulldogs!

Grade LevelSecond

Student GroupMixed AbilityWhy?

I wanted to expose each student, regardless of ability, to the complex texts and the rigorous text dependent questions.

Page 4: Common Core Connections

Common Core ConnectionsInstructional Focus and Standards Addressed

Two – Tiered Lesson RI.2.4: Determine the meaning of

words and phrases in a text relevant to a grade 2 topic or subject area.

RI.2.5: Know and use various text features to locate key facts or information in a text efficiently.

Main Objective RI.2.6: Identify the main purpose of a

text, including what the author wants to answer, explain, or describe.

Culminating Activity SL.2.2: Recount or describe key ideas

or details from a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media.

Page 5: Common Core Connections

Literacy Theories

Literacy Theorie

s

Social Constructivi

sm

Reader Response

TheorySchema Theory

Social ConstructivismScaffolding

Schema TheoryTuning

Reader Response TheoryEfferent

Responses

Page 6: Common Core Connections

Text Complexity ProgressionFirst Text

Giant Pandas by Kira Freed

Lexile Level: 601 - 650Developmental Reading

Assessment Level: 28Note: Perfect Fit!

Qualitative Reflection Considerate Text

Coherent Text Appropriate for Audience

Second TextGiant Pandas by Gail

Gibbons

Lexile Level: 860Developmental Reading

Assessment Level: 38Note: Stretch Band

Qualitative Reflection Increase in Complexity

Sentence Structure Considerate Text

Page 7: Common Core Connections

Pre – Assessment StrategiesAdmit Slip

What do you know about giant pandas?

Anticipation GuideTrue or False?

KWL Plus What I Know What I Want to Learn What I Learned What I Thought I Knew

{Misconceptions}

Page 8: Common Core Connections

Examples of ScaffoldingBefore Reading

Making PredictionsIntroduce Vocabulary

TermsContent Specific

During ReadingShow Me the

Evidence!Importance of

Rereading and Reflecting on Thinking

Page 9: Common Core Connections

Scaffolding Video

Page 10: Common Core Connections

Text Based Questioning: ExamplesGiant Pandas, by Gail Gibbons

1. What is the author’s purpose for using a map? What do the colors show?

2. Why did the author use the word “poor” to describe the giant pandas eyesight?

3. Compare and contrast a bark and a squeal. When might a panda bark?

Giant Pandas, by Kira Freed

1. Describe what makes a panda “easily recognizable” in the wild.

2. What is the author’s purpose for writing the section titled “Food and Feeding?”

3. Describe the signs that giant pandas use to mark their territory.

Page 11: Common Core Connections

Text Based Questioning Video

Page 12: Common Core Connections

Evidence of LearningLesson One

3, 2, 1Lesson Two

Tree Map: Can, Have, AreCulminating Activity

VoiceThreadEach student had the

opportunity to demonstrate their understanding of the Author’s Purpose by reflecting on a section of text.

“I know that the author wanted to explain _____ because _____.”

Page 13: Common Core Connections

1. Building knowledge through content – rich nonfiction. Students were able to actively construct knowledge while reading

the text and refine, or tune, their schema.2. Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence

from text, both literary and informational. Students were able to answer text dependent questions with

specific evidence from the text. 3. Regular practice with complex text and its academic

language. The two texts that I selected for the lesson increased in complexity. The first text was easier for my students to interact with and

understand, due to the author’s use of text features. The second text was much more difficult for my students because

the author did not use text features, and the sentence structure was much more complex.

Reflection: The Three Shifts

Page 14: Common Core Connections

Close Reading In the future, I would not read the entire text with the students,

but a small section of text. This would allow for a close reading of the text, which would

increase the students ability to answer text dependent questions. Text

Because I used a trade book for the second read aloud, each student did not have a copy.

In the future, I will make a copy of a portion of the text for each student. This way, each student can annotate the text to help them better understand the meaning.

Author’s Purpose Instead of waiting until the culminating activity for my students to

demonstrate their understanding of the Author’s Purpose, I will assess the objective throughout. Graphic Organizer Post – It’s

What would I change for future implementation?

Page 15: Common Core Connections

Questions?

Suggestion

s?

Audience Feedback