common communication failures (and ways to avoid them!)
TRANSCRIPT
Common Communication Failures (and ways to avoid them!)
Benjamin Mitchell@benjaminm
Partner, Equal Experts
Feedback
“Your feedback to the team member was poor because:It did not focus on any positive actions and it didn’t use any examples“
Measuring Transparency
Transformation Coaches wanted to increase teams’ level of transparency
To measure their impact they stood with a clip board and secretly scored the transparency of each team member in meetings
https://vimeo.com/43256388
Top 6 Communication Failures1. Framing the problem as “the other(s)”2. Hoping that data will speak for itself3. Pushing “the one right approach” (yours)4. Trying to persuade someone by arguing with
them5. Ignoring how you or others feel – just being
rational6. Trying to make changes in one giant leap
Left Hand Right Hand Case Study
What I thought but did not sayWhat we are doing is crazy!
Use humour so I don’t offend them
Uh oh, they feel criticised. Better stop.
It looks like we’ll never really address this point now … I feel really disappointed
What was saidMe: (Joking) I think this may be the best graph I ever done [explain detail]. I thought it might be interesting to review here.Sponsor: This graph shows how well the technical team has done and how badly we have made business decisions.[all laugh]
Left Hand Right Hand Case Study
What I thought but did not sayWhat we are doing is crazy!
Use humour so I don’t offend them
Uh oh, they feel criticised. Better stop.
It looks like we’ll never really address this point now … I feel really disappointed
What was saidMe: (Joking) I think this may be the best graph I ever done [explain detail]. I thought it might be interesting to review here.Sponsor: This graph shows how well the technical team has done and how badly we have made business decisions.[all laugh]
Easing inNot sharing all relevant information Unilaterally
looking after their feelings
Untested assumption
Untested assumption
Lack of joint design
Not sharing all relevant information
ReframingIndividual FrameOne the Issues:There is one right answerI’m right, you are wrongYou don’t get itOn the People:Your are mad or badYou alone are to blameYou must change for this to work
Relational FrameOne the Issues:
We each see things the other missesTo find common ground, explore our differencesComplex, ambiguous issues can be frustratingOn the People:
We are doing doing the best we can and need each other’s helpWe are both responsible
Wasted Time Area Sum of Team Time WastedInternal 457
Desktop PC 98Development Technology 82Builds 72Process Issue 51Technical Debt 36Merging 25Team Technology 15Specifications 15
External Team 420Pricing Engine A 145Document Generation Team 81Pricing Engine B 41Single Sign On 39Pricing Engine C 33Oracle Database 24XML Data Architecture 17Pricing Engine D 10
Common Environment 56Jira 18Wiki 16
Grand Total 935
Wasted Time Sources
The Ladder of Inference
Select
Describe
Explain
Evaluate
Propose Actions
Source: Based on the work of Schwarz, Argyris & Schon, Noonan and Action Design Partners
Assumptions
Practising with the Ladder of Inference
Say what you see [at the Describe Level]
Say what you think it means.
“PEOPLE ARE ALL FOR THE TRUTH, AS LONG AS THE TRUTH IS NOT EMBARRASSING OR THREATENING”
CHRIS ARGYRIS
Avoiding Communication Failures1. Get curious: how might you be contributing to the
problem?2. Make offers and be good to work with3. Use the Ladder of Inference to ask better questions4. Use tools to create psychological safety5. Negotiate: jointly design (small) ways forward
Any questions?
Books to read• The Skilled Facilitator by Roger
Schwarz• Getting More by Stuart Diamond• Difficult Conversations by Stone,
Patton & Heen
Contact me:
twitter.com/benjaminm