commercial real estate appraisal and consulting … · credible value opinion of the subject...

38
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES HOUSTON 3203 Edloe Street Houston, Texas 77027 713.463.8761 DALLAS/FORT WORTH 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 13750 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.205.3622 SAN ANTONI O 7272 Wurzbach Road, Suite 1001 San Antonio, Texas 78240 210.488.1735 AUSTI N 204 Sumac Lane Cedar Park, Texas 78613 512.650.6598 WWW.NAPLLP.COM

Upload: others

Post on 25-Sep-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISALAND CONSULTING SERVICES

HOUSTON3203 Edloe Street Houston, Texas 77027 713.463.8761

DALLAS/FORT WORTH1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 13750 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.205.3622

SAN ANTONI O7272 Wurzbach Road, Suite 1001 San Antonio, Texas 78240 210.488.1735

AUSTI N204 Sumac Lane Cedar Park, Texas 78613 512.650.6598

WWW.NAPLLP.COM

Page 2: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

APPRAISAL OF

AN EVENT CENTER AND TWO EXCESS TRACTS OF LAND

LOCATED AT

3330 FM 1463 KATY, FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS 77494

DATE OF VALUE NOVEMBER 5, 2018

DATE OF REPORT NOVEMBER 9, 2018

DATE OF INSPECTION

NOVEMBER 5, 2018

PREPARED FOR

MR. TOMMY THOMAS

3330 FM 1463 KATY, TEXAS 77494

PREPARED BY

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS, LLP

HOUSTON 3203 EDLOE STREET

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (713) 463-8761

AUSTIN 204 SUMAC LANE

CEDAR PARK, TEXAS 78613 (512) 650-6598

DALLAS/FORT WORTH 1910 PACIFIC AVE., STE. 14145

DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 (214) 205-3622

SAN ANTONIO 7272 WURZBACH ROAD, SUITE 1001

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78240 (210) 488-1735

NAP LLP FILE #: 18-1602

Page 3: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

1

November 9, 2018

Mr. Tommy ThomasThe Tuscany Villa 3330 FM 1463 Katy, Texas 77494

Re: Appraisal of an event center and two tracts of excess land located at 3330 FM 1463, Katy, Fort Bend County, Texas 77494

Dear Mr. Thomas,

At your request we have appraised the above referenced property. The purpose of this appraisal is to provide an estimate of the market value of the fee simple interest of the above referenced property “As Is” (Primary Tract and Improvements) as of the date of inspection, or November 5, 2018, an estimate of the market value of the fee simple interest of the above referenced property “As Is” (Excess Tract 1) as of the date of inspection, or November 5, 2018 and an estimate of the market value of the fee simple interest of the above referenced property “As Is” (Excess Tract 2) as of the date of inspection, or November 5, 2018. The intended use of this appraisal is for disposition purposes by Mr. Tommy Thomas. We have performed appraisal services regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment.

This appraisal is provided in a Restricted Report which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2 (b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and is for the intended use stated in this report. The appraisers are not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. Mr. Tommy Thomas and National Appraisal Partners, LLP have discussed and mutually agreed to the adequacy of this report based on the investigation undertaken and the intended use.

This report is for the exclusive use of Mr. Tommy Thomas, his affiliates, designates and assignees and no other party shall have any right to rely on any service provided by National Appraisal Partners, LLP without prior written consent. The client for this appraisal is Mr. Tommy Thomas. We have retained additional information in our workfile which supports our analyses and conclusions. We limit reliance on this report to the client as it cannot be understood properly without the additional information retained in our workfile. These opinions are to be used solely for the purpose stated above and are subject to the accompanying definitions of market value and Statement of General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions.

Page 4: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Mr. Tommy Thomas November 9, 2018 Page 2

2

Our valuation was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP") of The Appraisal Foundation, and with regulations adopted by the Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, required under Title XI of the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. The scope of this appraisal involved the systematic research and analysis necessary to reach a value conclusion for the subject. The initial step was to inspect the subject property and the surrounding area. The extent of our inspection of the subject property included a complete inspection of the interior and exterior of the buildings. After analyzing the macro environment, research was conducted relevant to the valuation process, including gathering comparable land and improved sales and listings, real estate tax data and other pertinent information. We have completed the Sales Comparison Approach to value for this appraisal only. The Cost and Income Capitalization Approaches are not appropriate approaches to value the subject property given its owner-user nature and overall physical characteristics. Therefore, we have not completed the Cost and Income Capitalization Approach for this appraisal. The scope of work defined herein is adequate to derive a credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According to the Fort Bend County Appraisal District (FBCAD), the current owner of record for the subject property is Mr. Ernest Benton Thomas. Mr. Thomas acquired the subject property in 2005. The subject property has been listed for sale for approximately two years for $5,250,000 or $419.90 per square foot. Based on the analysis presented herein, the listing price is above a market level. The subject owner received two offers to purchase the portions of the subject property at $10.25 per square foot of the land area desired (front portion of the site) that did not result in any contracts for sale. Based on the analysis presented herein, the offer prices were below a market level. The subject owner has received an offer to purchase the property (Primary and Excess Tracts) for $5,250,000 or $419.90 per square foot. Based on the analysis presented herein, the offer price is above a market level. Based on our research, there have been no transactions involving the subject property over the past three years.

Page 5: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Mr. Tommy Thomas November 9, 2018 Page 3

3

Definition of Market Value The current definition of market value, as defined by the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA), effective August 24, 1990, is as follows:

The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:

1.) Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2.) Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider

their own best interests; 3.) A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4.) Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial

arrangements comparable thereto; and 5.) The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by

special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.

Page 6: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Mr. Tommy Thomas November 9, 2018 Page 4

4

Fee simple interest, as used herein, is defined by The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, as:

Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power and escheat.

Site Analysis

Location: W/S FM 1463, 994 feet south of Westridge Creek Lane

Size: Primary Tract: 6.680 acres or 290,980 square feet Excess Tract 1: 0.677 acres or 29,500 square feet Excess Tract 2: 0.643 acres or 28,000 square feet

Shape: Rectangular Frontage: Primary Tract: 54 FF – FM 1463

Excess Tract 1: 131 FF – FM 1463 Excess Tract 2: 125.29 FF – FM 1463

Topography: Level and at street grade Drainage: Appeared adequate upon inspection Access Points: One via FM 1463 Accessibility: Good Utilities Water and Sewer: Water Well and Septic System Electricity: CenterPoint Energy Natural Gas: CenterPoint Energy Zoning: None Flood Plain: Zone X (see flood plain map in Addenda) Easements/Encroachments: No adverse easements/encroachments were noted

during our inspection. Environmental Considerations: None noted upon inspection

Improvements Analysis Year Built/Renovated: 2005/2018 Building Size: 12,503 square feet Land-to-Building Ratio: 28.88 to 1.0 (based on primary tract and building

footprint) Foundation: Concrete slab Roof: Clay Tile Exterior Walls: Stucco Interior Finish: Painted sheetrock and wood paneled walls; wood,

ceramic tiled and carpet floors; painted sheetrock and wood beam ceilings with canned and hung fluorescent lighting

Restrooms: Four restrooms – adequate to serve the facility

Page 7: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Mr. Tommy Thomas November 9, 2018 Page 5

5

Doors: There are glass set in wood frame entry doors. Interior doors are wood.

Site Improvements: Concrete paving, wood fencing, wrought iron fencing, wrought iron gates, an outdoor fireplace, fountains, landscaping, stabilization, a water well and septic system and canopies

Highest and Best Use/Marketing and Exposure Time Site As If Vacant: Retail/commercial development Property As Improved: Continued use as an event center Marketing/Exposure Time: Twelve months or less

In order to apply the Sales Comparison Approach to the subject property (Primary Tract and Improvements), we first estimated the market value of the subject land (primary tract) as if vacant via the Sales Comparison Approach. We have researched and analyzed recent improved sales and listings in the greater Houston Area similar to the subject property (we also included the sale of a similar property in Austin). We contacted individuals having knowledge of the transaction details and discussed the sales to the fullest extent possible. The most pertinent sales to analyze the subject are summarized on the exhibit in the Addenda. The units of comparison adjusted for cash equivalency, rent loss, deferred maintenance and rehabilitation costs where applicable (improvements only – after removing the land values). Investors indicate that they rely on the sale price per square foot method to analyze similar properties. For the sale price per square foot method, we compared the sales to the subject property and adjusted their sale price per square foot for differences in market conditions (time), conditions of sale, location and various physical characteristics. The adjusted prices for the sales were then reconciled into a final value indication via this approach and added to the subject primary tract land value. Based on this analysis, we estimate the market value of the subject property (Primary Tract and Improvements) via the Sales Comparison Approach at $3,770,000. A Land Sales Map, a Land Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid, an Improved Sales Map and an Improved Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid are included in the Addenda. In order to apply the Sales Comparison Approach to the subject property (Excess Tract 1), we have researched and analyzed recent land sales and listings in the greater Houston Area similar to the subject property. We contacted individuals having knowledge of the transaction details and discussed the sales to the fullest extent possible. The most pertinent sales to analyze the subject are summarized on the exhibit in the Addenda. The units of comparison adjusted for cash equivalency, where applicable. Investors indicate that they rely on the sale price per square foot method to analyze similar properties. For the sale price per square foot method, we compared the sales to the subject property and adjusted their sale price per square foot for differences in market conditions (time), conditions of sale, location and various physical characteristics. The adjusted prices for the sales were then reconciled into a final value indication via this approach. Based on this analysis, we estimate the market value of the subject property (Excess Tract 1) via the Sales Comparison

Page 8: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Mr. Tommy Thomas November 9, 2018 Page 6

6

Approach at $413,000. A Land Sales Map and a Land Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid are included in the Addenda. In order to apply the Sales Comparison Approach to the subject property (Excess Tract 2), we have researched and analyzed recent land sales and listings in the greater Houston Area similar to the subject property. We contacted individuals having knowledge of the transaction details and discussed the sales to the fullest extent possible. The most pertinent sales to analyze the subject are summarized on the exhibit in the Addenda. The units of comparison adjusted for cash equivalency, where applicable. Investors indicate that they rely on the sale price per square foot method to analyze similar properties. For the sale price per square foot method, we compared the sales to the subject property and adjusted their sale price per square foot for differences in market conditions (time), conditions of sale, location and various physical characteristics. The adjusted prices for the sales were then reconciled into a final value indication via this approach. Based on this analysis, we estimate the market value of the subject property (Excess Tract 2) via the Sales Comparison Approach at $392,000. A Land Sales Map and a Land Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid are included in the Addenda. We have placed sole weight on the Sales Comparison Approach in our reconciliation. Based on the investigation described in this Restricted Report, the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property (Primary Tract and Improvements) as of the date of inspection, or November 5, 2018, is as follows:

THREE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS $3,770,000

Based on the investigation described in this Restricted Report, the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property (Excess Tract 1) as of the date of inspection, or November 5, 2018, is as follows:

FOUR HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS $413,000

Based on the investigation described in this Restricted Report, the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property (Excess Tract 2) as of the date of inspection, or November 5, 2018, is as follows:

THREE HUNDRED NINETY TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS $392,000

Page 9: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Mr. Tommy Thomas November 9, 2018 Page 7

7

We appreciate the opportunity to perform this service for Mr. Tommy Thomas.

Sincerely, NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS, LLP

Thomas A. Stark, MAI, Partner Bryan S. Miller, MAI, CCIM, Partner State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser TX-1325319-G TX-1328184-G Attachments

Page 10: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

8

CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting

conditions and assumptions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions.

I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved.

I have performed appraisal services regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment.

I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment.

My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.

The Appraisal Assignment was not based on a requested minimal valuation, a specific valuation or the approval of a loan.

My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.

My analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.

Bryan S. Miller made a personal inspection of the subject property. Thomas A. Stark and Brooke M. Carrera did not make a personal inspection of the subject property.

Brooke M. Carrera provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the people signing this certification, including research, analysis and writing the report.

The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute.

The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.

As of the date of this report, Thomas A. Stark and Bryan S. Miller have completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute.

Thomas A. Stark and Bryan S. Miller currently hold an appropriate state certification allowing the performance of real estate appraisals in connection with federally related transactions in the state in which the subject property is located.

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas A. Stark, MAI, Partner Bryan S. Miller, MAI, CCIM, Partner State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser TX-1325319-G TX-1328184-G

Page 11: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

9

STATEMENT OF GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

This appraisal report has been made with the following general assumptions and limiting conditions.

General

1. No investigation has been made of, and no responsibility is assumed for, the legal description of the property being valued or for legal matters, including title or encumbrances. Title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. The property is further assumed to be free and clear of any or all liens, easements or encumbrances unless otherwise stated.

2. Information furnished by others, upon which all or portions of this report are based, is believed to be reliable, but has not been verified in all cases. No warranty is given as to the accuracy of such information.

3. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based.

4. Full compliance with the applicable federal, state and local zoning, use, environmental and similar laws and regulations is assumed, unless otherwise stated.

5. No responsibility is taken for changes in market conditions, and no obligation is assumed to revise this report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date hereof.

6. The value estimates herein are predicated on the financial structure prevailing as of the date of this report.

7. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed.

8. The allocation, if any, in this report of the total value between components of the property applies only to the program of utilization stated in this report. The separate values for any components may not be applicable for any other purpose and must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal.

9. Areas and dimensions of the property were obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Maps or sketches, if included in this report, are only to assist the reader in visualizing the property; and no responsibility is assumed for their accuracy. No independent surveys were conducted.

10. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them.

11. No soil analysis or geological studies were ordered or made in conjunction with this report, nor was an investigation made of any water, oil, gas, coal or other subsurface mineral and use rights or conditions.

Page 12: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

10

12. Neither National Appraisal Partners LLP nor any individual signing or associated with this report shall be required by reason of this report to give further consultation, provide testimony or appear in court or at other legal proceedings unless specified arrangements therefore have been made.

13. Neither this report nor any portions thereof (including without limitation any conclusions as to value, the identity of National Appraisal Partners LLP or any individuals signing or associated with this report, or the professional associations or organizations with which they are affiliated) shall be disseminated to third parties, without the prior written consent and approval of National Appraisal Partners LLP.

14. The date of analysis on which the conclusion and opinion expressed in this report apply is set forth in the letter of transmittal. Our value opinion is based on the purchasing power of the United States' dollar as of this date.

15. We are not qualified to investigate or test for the presence of toxic materials or substances. Unless otherwise stated in this report, no hazardous material, which may or may not be present on or near the property, was observed. We have no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property; however, we are not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of potentially hazardous substances, such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, or industrial wastes, may affect the value of the property. The value conclusions herein are predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on, in, or near the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client should retain an expert in this field if further information is desired.

16. We have not attempted to measure the potential impact on value of recent enforcement of wetlands legislation. Certain areas of the subject site may be dry and developable, while others may contain reclaimable and/or non-reclaimable wetland areas. We are not qualified to make such judgments and recommend retaining an expert in this field, if desired. Our value conclusions are predicated on there being no wetlands impact.

17. We did not make any observations or interpretations on compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act. We are not experts in this field and are not qualified to make such determinations. Our value estimate is predicated upon the property owner(s) bearing no costs for compliance.

Extraordinary Assumptions (the use of which might have affected the assignment results herein):

1. There are no Extraordinary Assumptions for this appraisal.

Hypothetical Conditions (the use of which might have affected the assignment results herein):

1. There are no Hypothetical Conditions for this appraisal.

Page 13: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

ADDENDA Subject Photographs Neighborhood Map

Subject Survey Subject Plat Map

Subject Flood Map Subject Building Sketches

Ad Valorem Tax Schedule Exhibit Land Sales Map – Primary Tract

Land Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid – Primary Tract Improved Sales Map

Improved Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid Land Sales Map – Excess Tract 1

Land Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid – Excess Tract 1 Land Sales Map – Excess Tract 2

Land Sales Summary and Adjustment Grid – Excess Tract 2 Qualifications

State Certifications

Page 14: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Aerial view of the subject property

Looking south along FM 1463 with the subject property on the right

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS Subject Photos

Page 15: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Exterior view of Building 1

Interior view of Building 1

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS Subject Photos

Page 16: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Interior view of Building 1

Interior view of Building 1

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS Subject Photos

Page 17: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Exterior vies of Building 2

Interior view of Building 2

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS Subject Photos

Page 18: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Interior view of Building 2

Rear view of the subject buildings

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS Subject Photos

Page 19: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

View of Excess Tract 1

View of Excess Tract 2

NATIONAL APPRAISAL PARTNERS Subject Photos

Page 20: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Neighborhood Map

Page 21: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According
Page 22: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According
Page 23: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According
Page 24: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According
Page 25: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According
Page 26: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Property Address: 3330 FM 1463

Katy, Fort Bend County, Texas 77494

Owner: Ernest Benton Thomas

Account Number: R363856 & R339502

Land size(1): 8.000 Acs.

Bldg. size(1): 10,331 Sq.Ft.

2017 2018

Tax Assessment

Land $635,470 $1,533,310

Improvements $1,221,730 $1,250,300

Total $1,857,200 $2,783,610

Total PSF $179.77 $269.44

Tax Rates ($ per $100 of assessed value)

Jurisdiction:

Fort Bend Drainage $0.01600 $0.01900

Fort Bend County General $0.45800 $0.44500

Fort Bend County ESD 4 $0.10000 $0.10000

Katy ISD $1.51660 $1.51660

Combined tax rate: $2.09060 $2.08060

Total Tax Payments(2)

Jurisdiction:

Fort Bend Drainage $297 $529

Fort Bend County General $8,506 $12,387

Fort Bend County ESD 4 $1,857 $2,784

Katy ISD $28,166 $42,216

Total $38,826 $57,916

Total PSF $3.76 $5.61

Notes:

(1) Fort Bend County Appraisal District recorded size.(2) There are no delinquent taxes reported for the subject property.

AD VALOREM TAX SCHEDULE

Page 27: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Land Sales Map – Primary Tract

Page 28: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

MARKET DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6

LocationE/S Cane Island Parkway, 305 feet south of U.S. Highway 90

NW/S Saddlespur Lane, 700 feet northeast of Westheimer

Parkway

SE/C Katy Flewellen Road and Prairie Lane

NE/C FM 1463 and Crossover Road

E/C Roesner Road and Westheimer Parkway

W/S Pin Oak Road, 231 feet south of Roberts Road

City Katy Katy Katy Katy Katy KatyDate of Sale Oct/17 May/17 Feb/17 Jul/15 Jun/15 Jun/15Size (Ac.) 12.000 Acs. 2.566 Acs. 2.000 Acs. 3.414 Acs. 2.170 Acs. 3.131 Acs.Size (SF) 522,720 111,787 87,120 148,715 94,525 136,386Sale Price $5,016,699 $830,000 $799,000 $1,748,888 $975,039 $976,000Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. $9.60 $7.42 $9.17 $11.76 $10.32 $7.16

Proposed Development Speculation Soccer Academy Unknown Auto Repair and Commercial Speculation Hardware Store

Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. $9.60 $7.42 $9.17 $11.76 $10.32 $7.16

MULTIPLIED ADJUSTMENTSElapsed Time (Years) 1.1 years 1.5 years 1.7 years 3.3 years 3.4 years 3.4 yearsMarket Conditions/Time Adjustment 3.3% 4.5% 5.1% 9.9% 10.2% 10.2%Conditions of Sale Adjustment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Ceq. Cond/Time Adj. Price PSF $9.92 $7.75 $9.64 $12.92 $11.37 $7.89

ADDED ADJUSTMENTS

Location Adjustment 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Physical Characteristics: Size Adjustment/Sq. Ft. Basis 5% -10% -15% -5% -15% -10% Shape/Depth 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% Access/Frontage 0% 0% 0% -5% -5% 0% Corner 0% 0% -10% -10% -10% 0% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Flood Plain 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Utilities -5% 0% 0% -5% 0% -5% Zoning 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Total Adjustment 5% -10% -20% -25% -30% -15%

Adjusted Price/Sq. Ft. $10.42 $6.98 $7.71 $9.69 $7.96 $6.71

PSF METHOD Low: $6.71 INDICATED VALUE ESTIMATE

High: $10.42

Mean: $8.25 $2,327,840

Median: $7.84

$2,328,000

Notes:

Katy

6.680 Acs.290,980 SF

Event Center With Two Excess Tracts Of Land

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

--

LAND SALES SUMMARY AND ADJUSTMENT GRID - PRIMARY TRACT

$8.00 X 290,980 =

Indicated Market Value of Subject Site (Rounded):

SUBJECT

W/S FM 1463, 994 feet south of Westridge Creek Lane

Page 29: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Improved Sales Map

Page 30: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

MARKET DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Property NameEvent Center with Two Excess

Tracts of LandFormer University of Houston -

West Houston CampusJackie's Brickhouse Restaurant

1730 Jefferson Street Office Building/Events Venue

River Road Chateau19870 Cypress Church Road

Events Venue12036 Veterans Memorial Drive

Restaurant8526 Northern Street Church

Address 3330 FM 1463 4242 South Mason Road 1053 Marina Bay Drive 1730 Jefferson Street 5511 County Road 424 19870 Cypress Church Road 12036 Veterans Memorial Drive 8526 Northern Street

City Katy Katy Kemah Houston Anna Cypress Houston HoustonYear Built 2005 1990 1997 2005 2005 1998 2013 2001Year Renovated 2018 N/A 2003 N/A 2015 N/A N/A N/ANet Rentable Area 12,503 37,320 11,184 39,460 8,580 8,400 6,264 12,000 Land Area - Acres 10.00 3.66 1.44 76.00 10.00 1.54 2.00Site Square Footage 435,600 159,430 62,726 3,310,560 435,600 67,082 87,120Land-to-Building Ratio 23.27 to 1 11.67 to 1 14.24 to 1 3.20 to 1 385.85 to 1 51.86 to 1 10.71 to 1 7.26 to 1Type of Construction Brick and Concrete Block Metal Brick and Glass Wood and Metal Brick Stucco with Stone BrickOccupancy at Sale 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Sale Date -- 12/18/17 10/13/17 03/15/17 01/17/17 01/10/17 12/29/16 06/17/15Sale Price -- $6,700,000 $1,905,000 $9,000,000 $2,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000Price Per Sq. Ft. -- $179.53 $170.33 $228.08 $256.41 $142.86 $239.46 $125.00

MULTIPLIED ADJUSTMENTSElapsed Time (Years) 0.9 years 1.1 years 1.6 years 1.8 years 1.8 years 1.9 years 3.4 yearsMarket Conditions/Time Adjustment 2.7% 3.3% 4.8% 5.4% 5.4% 5.7% 10.2%Conditions of Sale Adjustment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Ceq. Cond/Time Adj. Price $6,880,900 $1,967,865 $9,432,000 $2,318,800 $1,264,800 $1,585,500 $1,653,000

Less Estimated Land Value(1) $3,920,400 $478,290 $4,704,450 $1,489,752 $326,700 $503,115 $348,480

Less Estimated Land Value PSF(1) $9.00 $3.00 $75.00 $0.45 $0.75 $7.50 $4.00 Effective Building Value (excluding land) $2,960,500 $1,489,575 $4,727,550 $829,048 $938,100 $1,082,385 $1,304,520Price PSF of Building Area Only $79.33 $133.19 $119.81 $96.63 $111.68 $172.79 $108.71 ADDED ADJUSTMENTSSize 10% 0% 15% 0% -5% -10% 0%Age/Condition 5% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0%Quality of Construction 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Occupancy 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Anchor/Tenancy 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Physical Characteristics 10% -10% 0% 0% 0% -10% 5%Total Adjustment 25% -10% 15% 0% 0% -20% 5%

Adjusted Price/Sq. Ft. $99.16 $119.87 $137.78 $96.63 $111.68 $138.23 $114.15

PSF METHOD Low: $96.63 INDICATED VALUE ESTIMATE

High: $138.23

Mean: $116.79 $1,437,845

Median: $114.15 Plus Land Value: $2,328,000

Equals: $3,765,845

$3,770,000

Indicated Market Value "As Is" Via Sales Comparison Approach (Rounded):

$115.00 X 12,503 =

IMPROVED SALES SUMMARY AND ADJUSTMENT GRID

SUBJECT

Stucco

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

6.680290,980

Page 31: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Land Sales Map – Excess Tract 1

Page 32: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

MARKET DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6

LocationE/S North Mason Road, 520 feet

south of Clay Road

E/S FM 1463, 1,512.8 feet southwest of Kingsland

Boulevard

NW/C Kingsland Boulevard and AMC Drive and SW/C Katy Mills

Circle and AMC Drive

N/S Market Place Drive, approximately 200 feet east of

Katy Mills Boulevard

NE/C FM 1463 and Crossover Road

SE/S Kingsland Boulevard, 216 feet southwest of Pin Oak Road

City Katy Katy Katy Katy Katy KatyDate of Sale Sep/17 Jul/17 Dec/16 Nov/16 Jul/15 Mar/15Size (Ac.) 0.344 Acs. 1.203 Acs. 1.318 Acs. 1.160 Acs. 3.414 Acs. 1.460 Acs.Size (SF) 15,000 52,389 57,416 50,530 148,715 63,598Sale Price $157,500 $710,399 $1,024,893 $820,000 $1,748,888 $578,741Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. $10.50 $13.56 $17.85 $16.23 $11.76 $9.10Proposed Development Unknown Retail Center Medical Unknown Auto Repair and Commercial Hotel Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. $10.50 $13.56 $17.85 $16.23 $11.76 $9.10

MULTIPLIED ADJUSTMENTSElapsed Time (Years) 1.1 years 1.3 years 1.9 years 2.0 years 3.3 years 3.6 yearsMarket Conditions/Time Adjustment 3.3% 3.9% 5.7% 6.0% 9.9% 10.8%Conditions of Sale Adjustment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Ceq. Cond/Time Adj. Price PSF $10.85 $14.09 $18.87 $17.20 $12.92 $10.08

ADDED ADJUSTMENTS

Location Adjustment 5% 0% -10% -10% 0% -10%Physical Characteristics: Size Adjustment/Sq. Ft. Basis -5% 5% 5% 5% 20% 10% Shape/Depth 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 5% Access/Frontage 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% Corner 0% 0% -10% 0% -10% 0% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Flood Plain 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Utilities -5% -5% -5% -5% -5% -5% Zoning 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Total Adjustment -5% 5% -20% -5% 5% 0%

Adjusted Price/Sq. Ft. $10.31 $14.79 $15.10 $16.34 $13.57 $10.08

PSF METHOD Low: $10.08 INDICATED VALUE ESTIMATE

High: $16.34

Mean: $13.37 $413,000

Median: $14.18

$413,000

Notes:

Houston

0.677 Acs.

----

--

29,500 SF

--

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

--

LAND SALES SUMMARY AND ADJUSTMENT GRID - EXCESS TRACT 1

$14.00 X 29,500 =

Indicated Market Value of Subject Site (Rounded):

SUBJECT

W/S FM 1463, 975 feet south of Westridge Creek Lane

Page 33: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Land Sales Map – Excess Tract 2

Page 34: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

MARKET DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6

LocationE/S North Mason Road, 520 feet

south of Clay Road

E/S FM 1463, 1,512.8 feet southwest of Kingsland

Boulevard

NW/C Kingsland Boulevard and AMC Drive and SW/C Katy Mills

Circle and AMC Drive

N/S Market Place Drive, approximately 200 feet east of

Katy Mills Boulevard

NE/C FM 1463 and Crossover Road

SE/S Kingsland Boulevard, 216 feet southwest of Pin Oak Road

City Katy Katy Katy Katy Katy KatyDate of Sale Sep/17 Jul/17 Dec/16 Nov/16 Jul/15 Mar/15Size (Ac.) 0.344 Acs. 1.203 Acs. 1.318 Acs. 1.160 Acs. 3.414 Acs. 1.460 Acs.Size (SF) 15,000 52,389 57,416 50,530 148,715 63,598Sale Price $157,500 $710,399 $1,024,893 $820,000 $1,748,888 $578,741Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. $10.50 $13.56 $17.85 $16.23 $11.76 $9.10Proposed Development Unknown Retail Center Medical Unknown Auto Repair and Commercial Hotel Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. $10.50 $13.56 $17.85 $16.23 $11.76 $9.10

MULTIPLIED ADJUSTMENTSElapsed Time (Years) 1.1 years 1.3 years 1.9 years 2.0 years 3.3 years 3.6 yearsMarket Conditions/Time Adjustment 3.3% 3.9% 5.7% 6.0% 9.9% 10.8%Conditions of Sale Adjustment 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Ceq. Cond/Time Adj. Price PSF $10.85 $14.09 $18.87 $17.20 $12.92 $10.08

ADDED ADJUSTMENTS

Location Adjustment 5% 0% -10% -10% 0% -10%Physical Characteristics: Size Adjustment/Sq. Ft. Basis -5% 5% 10% 5% 20% 10% Shape/Depth 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 5% Access/Frontage 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% Corner 0% 0% -10% 0% -10% 0% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Flood Plain 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Utilities -5% -5% -5% -5% -5% -5% Zoning 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Total Adjustment -5% 5% -15% -5% 5% 0%

Adjusted Price/Sq. Ft. $10.31 $14.79 $16.04 $16.34 $13.57 $10.08

PSF METHOD Low: $10.08 INDICATED VALUE ESTIMATE

High: $16.34

Mean: $13.52 $392,000

Median: $14.18

$392,000

Notes:

$14.00 X 28,000 =

Indicated Market Value of Subject Site (Rounded):

28,000 SF------

--

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

LAND SALES SUMMARY AND ADJUSTMENT GRID - EXCESS TRACT 2

SUBJECT

W/S FM 1463, 1,160 feet south of Westridge Creek Lane

Houston--

0.643 Acs.

Page 35: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Thomas A. Stark, MAI

Partner

Mr. Stark is a Partner in National Appraisal Partners, LLP. He focuses primarily on commercial real estate appraisals. Key clients include financial institutions, accounting firms, attorneys, corporations, developers, government entities and private investors. Experience Mr. Stark has been actively engaged in the real estate appraisal industry since 1988. In 1994, Mr. Stark joined the Houston Real Estate Valuation and Consulting Group of Arthur Andersen. After being promoted to Senior Manager, he transferred to Dallas to lead the Real Estate Valuation and Consulting Group for the Firm’s Southwest Market Circle. In 2002, Mr. Stark co-founded National Appraisal Partners, LLP, a real estate appraisal and consulting firm. His experience includes appraisal, appraisal review, due diligence, and consulting engagements for various property types including office buildings, retail properties, industrial facilities, apartment complexes, gasoline stations/convenience stores, hotels, day care centers and many special-use properties. Mr. Stark began his real estate career in Palm Beach County, Florida. Affiliations/Advisory Boards Mr. Stark holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute. He is the Past President of the Houston Chapter of the Appraisal Institute and has served on the Houston Chapter Board of Directors. He has served as a Regional Representative for the Houston Chapter, and has served on numerous national committees and boards including Public Relations, Communications, Public Affairs, Long-Range Planning, AI Holdings, the National Nominating Committee, the Appraisal Institute Relief Foundation and the Appraisal Institute Education Trust. He served two years on the National Board of Directors for the Appraisal Institute as the Chair and Vice Chair of Region VIII, which includes Texas and New Mexico. He is a board member of the Houston Chapter for 2016. Mr. Stark is the past editor of the Regional Real Estate News, a publication of the Appraisal Institute. He has served on the Real Estate Valuation Services Advisory Board for Wachovia Bank. Mr. Stark is a State of Texas and Louisiana Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. He has also completed the course and passed the exam for the Appraisal Institute course “Fundamentals of Separating Real, Personal Property and Intangible Business Assets”. Education Mr. Stark holds a Bachelors of Science in Real Estate from Florida State University. Personal Mr. Stark is from West Palm Beach, Florida and has resided in the Houston area since 1993.

Page 36: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According

Bryan S. Miller, MAI, CCIM

Partner

Mr. Miller is a partner in National Appraisal Partners, LLP. He focuses on commercial real estate valuation and consulting projects. His clients include financial institutions, law firms, accounting firms, pension funds, asset managers, corporations, individuals and developers. Experience Mr. Miller has been active in the valuation of commercial real estate since 1995. Mr. Miller joined Arthur Andersen’s Houston Real Estate Valuation and Consulting Group in 1997 and was promoted to manager in 1999. Mr. Miller co-founded National Appraisal Partners, LLP, an appraisal and consulting firm in 2002. His experience includes valuation and consulting for: retail, office, apartments, industrial buildings, subdivisions, auto dealerships, healthcare facilities, hotels/motels, tax credit properties, vacant land, ranches, mixed use developments, conservation easements and special purpose properties. In addition to valuation services, Bryan has performed a wide range of consulting services from feasibility analyses to portfolio disposition. His engagements have been a result of annual reporting, lending, estates and purchase price allocation. Affiliations/Advisory Boards Mr. Miller holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute. Mr. Miller was a board member and regional representative of the Houston Chapter of the Appraisal Institute for several years. He was the 2008 Treasurer/Secretary and the 2009 Vice President of the Houston Chapter. He served as the 2010 President of the Houston Chapter. He also served as a committee member on the National University Relations Subcommittee for the Appraisal Institute. Mr. Miller is a CCIM. He was a committee member in 2012 and 2013 for the CCIM Houston Real Estate Forecast Competition. He was the 2013 CCIM Houston Chapter Vice President. He was the Partner’s Committee Chair in 2013, 2014 and 2015. Mr. Miller is a State of Texas Certified General Real Estate Appraiser.

Education Mr. Miller holds a Masters and a Bachelors degree from the University of Texas at Austin. Personal Mr. Miller is a native Houstonian.

Page 37: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According
Page 38: COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING … · credible value opinion of the subject property. This Restricted Report is the written result of our findings and analysis. According