columbia county board of adjustment july 23, 2015 …€¦ · panel 0467c of the federal emergency...
TRANSCRIPT
COLUMBIA COUNTY
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
July 23, 2015 MEETING AGENDA COLUMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX
372 WEST DUVAL STREET, LAKE CITY, FLORIDA
7:00 P.M.
Pledge to U.S. Flag
Invocation
Public Comments
Public Hearings
V 0301 – A request by Tana Espenship Norris for a Variance from Section 4.4.7 “Minimum Yard
Requirements” of the County’s Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”) to allow for a
twelve (12) foot south side setback for all structures and a six (6) foot south side
setback for the existing mechanical equipment. The subject property is Lot 8, Unit 3 of
“Three Rivers Estates” and contains ±0.38 acres (Tax Parcel Number 00591-000).
Staff Matters
Adoption of the June 18, 2015 meeting minutes.
NOTE: All persons are advised that if they decide to appeal any decision made at the above referenced public
hearings, they may need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, they may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based.
District No.1- Ronald Williams
District No.2 - Rusty DePratter
District No.3 - Bucky Nash
District No.4 - Everett Phillips
District No.5 - Scarlet P. Frisina
Board of Adjustment Hearing Date: July 23, 2015
Quasi-Judicial Hearing
SUBJECT: V 0302 - A request for a Variance from Section 4.4.7 of the
County’s Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”) to allow for a twelve (12) foot south side setback for all structures and a six (6) foot
south side setback for the existing mechanical equipment on an
approximate 0.38 acre subject property.
APPLICANT/AGENT: Tana Espenship Norris
Tana Espenship Norris PROPERTY
OWNER(S):
Lot 8, Unit 3 of “Three Rivers Estates” - North of Single Family LOCATION: Residential; South of Single Family Residential; East of the Santa Fe
River; West of SW Iowa Drive; Columbia County, Florida.
00591-000 PARCEL ID
NUMBER(S):
±0.38 acres ACREAGE:
Environmentally Sensitive Area (“ESA”) EXISTING FLUM
Environmentally Sensitive Area - 2 (“ESA-2”) EXISTING ZONING
Brandon M. Stubbs PROJECT PLANNER:
BOARD MEETS THE FIRST THURSDAY AT 5:30 P.M.
AND THIRD THURSDAY AT 5:30 P.M.
P.O. BOX 1529 ⧩ LAKE CITY, FLORIDA 32056-1529 ⧩ PHONE: (386) 755-4100
SUMMARY
The proposed variance would allow for a deviation in the required minimum yard setback along the
south side of the subject property. The side setback requirement for the ESA-2 Zone District is 25 feet.
Lots within the Three Rivers Estates are typically very narrow and cannot accommodate side setbacks
of 25 feet. The existing legal nonconforming single family dwelling is approximately twelve (12) feet
from the south property boundary. On March 20, 2014, a permit was issued by the Columbia County
Building and Zoning Department for a deck. A portion of the permitted deck was allowed to be built
within the 25 foot setback on the south side; however, only up to the existing south side of the existing
single family dwelling. Further, there is existing mechanical equipment (air conditioner) that is located
within the required setback. The applicant is requesting a retroactive variance for the legal
nonconforming single family residence, the deck that was permitted by the Building and Zoning
Department, and the existing mechanical equipment. The variance would allow for a twelve (12) side
setback on the south side of the subject property for all structures and a six (6) foot side setback on the
south side for the existing mechanical equipment. The subject property currently contains one single
family residence.
Map 1. Proposed Official Zoning Atlas with Subject Property
The Environmentally Sensitive Area ("ESA") Zone District is described as follows in Section 4.4.1 of the Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”):
“The "ESA" environmentally sensitive area category includes three zone districts: ESA-1, 2, 3. Lands in
these districts are considered in need of special planning and treatment regarding land development
regulation. These are not preservation districts, but land uses permitted within these districts are to
provide mitigating measures to protect the natural functions of areas which are limited to the planning
and treatment of land development within the 100-year floodplain of the Ichetucknee Springs State Park,
Page 2 of 11
O'Leno State Park, Osceola National Forest, Pinhook Swamp, Suwannee River Corridor, Santa Fe River
Corridor and Ichetucknee Trace, as designated within the Federal Emergency Management [Agency] flood
insurance rate map for the county, as amended. These regulations prohibit intensive residential, intensive
recreational and intensive agricultural uses and prohibit industrial and commercial development within
the 100-year floodplain of the areas designated as environmentally sensitive areas.”
ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON
Zoning District: Environmentally Sensitive Area - 2
("ESA - 2")
Max. Gross Density: One (1) Dwelling Unit per Ten (10) Acres
Minimum Lot Area 10 Acres
Floor Area Ratio: 0.20
Typical Uses*: Non-Intensive Agriculture, Single-Family Dwellings, Mobile Homes,
Homes of six or fewer residents which otherwise meet the definition of
a “Community Residential Facility”, Public Resource-Based Recreation
Facilities, and Churches and other Houses of Worship
SURROUNDING USES
North of the subject property are Single Family Residences; south of the subject property are Single
Family Residences; west of the subject property is the Santa Fe River; and east of the subject property is
SW Iowa Drive.
The existing uses, Future Land Use Map (“FLUM”) Designations, and zone districts of the surrounding
area are identified in Table 1. Map 2 provides an overview of the vicinity of the subject property.
Table 1. Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Existing Use(s) FLUM Designation(s) Zoning District(s)
North Single Family Residences Environmentally
Sensitive Area
Environmentally
Sensitive Area - 2
(“ESA-2”)
South Single Family Residences Environmentally
Sensitive Area
Environmentally
Sensitive Area - 2
(“ESA-2”)
East SW Iowa Drive Environmentally
Sensitive Area
Environmentally
Sensitive Area - 2
(“ESA-2”)
West Santa Fe River N/A N/A
Page 3 of 11
Map 2. Vicinity Map
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The applicant proposes a zoning designation that is consistent with the proposed underlying Future Land
Use Map (“FLUM”) Designation. Below is a chart of the existing FLUM Designation and the existing zoning
designation consistent with said proposed FLUM Designation.
Table 2. Zoning Consistency with Underlying Future Land Use Map Designation
FLUM Designation Zoning Designation Consistent
Environmentally Sensitive
Area
Environmentally Sensitive Area – 2
(“ESA-2”)
The following Comprehensive Plan Elements have Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) that support the
proposed Site Specific Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas:
• Future Land Use Element
• Transportation Element
• Housing Element
• Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage,
Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge Element
Page 4 of 11
Map 3. Proposed Future Land Use Map Designation
Staff has reviewed the application for a Site Specific Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas for
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and finds the application consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) therein.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
Wetlands
According to Illustration A-VI of the Comprehensive Plan, entitled Wetlands Areas, which is based upon
the National Wetlands Inventory, dated 1987, and the National Wetlands Reconnaissance Survey, dated
1981, there are no wetlands located on the subject property.
Evaluation: Even though the National Wetland Inventory does not indicate any wetlands on the subject
property, the subject property is located along the Santa Fe River and could potentially have wetlands
located on the subject property; however, the Land Development Regulations has buffer requirements
from all wetland areas. Give the preceding information, there are no issues related to wetland protection.
Page 5 of 11
Map 4. Wetlands Map
Soil Survey
Each soil type found on the subject property is identified below. The hydrologic soil group is an indicator
of potential soil limitations. The hydrologic soil group, as defined for each specific soil, refers to a group
of soils which have been categorized according to their runoff-producing characteristics. These
hydrologic groups are defined by the Soil Survey of Columbia County, Florida, dated October 1984. The
chief consideration with respect to runoff potential is the capacity of each soil to permit infiltration (the
slope and kind of plant cover are not considered, but are separate factors in predicting runoff). There are
four hydrologic groups: A, B, C, and D. “Group A” soils have a higher infiltration rate when thoroughly wet
and therefore have a lower runoff potential. “Group D” soils have very lower infiltration rates and
therefore a higher runoff potential.
There is one (1) soil type found on the subject property:
1) Chiefland-Pedro Variant Complex, occasionally flooded soils are comprised of nearly level to sloping
soils that are within 3 miles of rivers and creeks interspersed with numerous sinkholes. The
Chiefland-Pedro Variant soil complex is comprised of 41 percent Chiefland soils and 39 percent Pedro
Variant soils. These soils are in areas so small or so intermingled that it was not practical to map
them separately. Chiefland-Pedro Variant complex have severe limitations for building site
development and for septic tank absorption fields.
Page 6 of 11
Evaluation: The soil type on the subject property is Chiefland-Pedro Variant Complex. Chiefland-Pedro
Variant Complex poses severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields and building site development.
Given the site is already developed, there are no issues related to soil suitability.
Map 5. Soils Map
Flood Potential
Panel 0467C of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
Series, dated February 4, 2009, indicates that the subject property is in Flood Zone "AE" (areas where a
base flood elevation is determined) and has a Base Flood Elevation of 34 feet.
Evaluation: Even though the subject property is located in Flood Zone "AE", the structure exists and is
elevated; therefore, there is no concern of flood on the subject property.
Page 7 of 11
Map 6. FEMA FIRM Map (Flood Map)
Stream to Sink
According to the Stream to Sink Watersheds, prepared by the Suwannee River Water Management District
and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, dated June 2, 2001, the subject property is not located
within a stream to sink area.
Evaluation: Given the subject property is not located in a Stream to Sink Watershed, there is no concern
related to Stream to Sink Watersheds.
Minerals
According to Illustration A-VII of the Comprehensive Plan, entitled Minerals, which is based upon Natural
Resources, prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2012, the subject property
is within an area known to contain Clayey Sand.
Evaluation: There are no issues related to minerals.
Historic Resources
According to Illustration A-II of the Comprehensive Plan, entitled Historic Resources, which is based upon
the Florida Division of Historical Resources, Master Site File, dated 2013, there are no known historic
resources located on the subject property.
Page 8 of 11
Evaluation: There are no issues related to historic Resources.
Aquifer Vulnerability
According to the Columbia County Floridan Aquifer System Protection Zone Map, prepared by the Advance
GeoSpacial Inc., dated September 29, 2009, the subject property is located in a more vulnerable area.
Evaluation: While the subject property is located in a more vulnerable area, there is no issue related to
aquifer vulnerability.
Vegetative Communities/Wildlife
According to Illustration V-I of the Data and Analysis Report, entitled Vegetative Communities, the subject
property is located within a non-vegetative community.
Evaluation: There is no known wildlife habitats associated with a non-vegetative community; therefore,
there is no issue related to vegetative communities or wildlife.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Section 12.3.1.2 of the Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”) establishes standards with which all
Variance applications must be found in compliance with. Staff’s evaluation of the application’s compliance
with the applicable standards of Section 12.3.1.2 of the LDRs is provided below.
1) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the
same zoning district.
Evaluation and Findings: The subject property is located in a platted subdivision which
was approved by the Board of County Commissioner on May 20, 1976 and does not meet the
current density requirements. The subject property is located in an Environmentally
Sensitive Area (“ESA”) Zone District which has 25 foot side setbacks. The subject property is
very narrow as is very common with the lots in Three Rivers Estates. This tends to lead to
structures being well within the require building setbacks. The existing dwelling is located
approximately 12 feet from the side property boundary on the south. A deck was permitted
on March 20, 2014 and constructed in accordance with the approved permit. The deck did
not protrude into the southerly side setback any further than the existing single family
dwelling. Further, there is existing mechanical equipment (air conditioning unit) located in
the southerly side setback. As the property owner, I’m requesting a retroactive variance
from the southerly side setback from 25 feet to 12 feet for the existing single family
residence and the permitted deck addition, and a retroactive variance from the southerly
side setback from 25 feet to 6 feet for the existing mechanical equipment (air conditioner).
Given the structures are existing, permitted structures and equipment, there are special
conditions and circumstances which exist that are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same
zoning district.
Page 9 of 11
2) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
Evaluation and Findings: There are no special conditions and circumstances that do not
result from the actions of the applicant. The existing deck was permitted through the
Columbia County Building and Zoning Department.
3) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by these Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”) to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the same Zoning District.
Evaluation and Findings: The granting of the variance requested will not confer on the
applicant a special privilege that is denied by these LDRs to other lands or structures in the
same Zoning District. Many of the lot within Three Rivers Estates have been granted
variances for the same or similar reason as the variance requested. It is not possible for the
narrow lots within the Three River Estates to meet the setback requirements of the ESA Zone
District.
4) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDRs would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the
LDRs and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
Evaluation and Findings: The literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDRs would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the LDRs and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on
the applicant. The subject property would not be able to be built upon if the literal
interpretation of the provisions of the LDRs were applied; therefore, creating an unnecessary
and undue hardship.
5) The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building, or structure.
Evaluation and Findings: The proposed variance, if approved, would be the minimum
variance allowed given that the single family residence, deck, and mechanical equipment are
already in existence. The variance requested is to allow the existing structures to be covered
via the variance, not for the purpose of allowing construction closer to the property line.
6) The grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the
LDRs, and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
Evaluation and Findings: As previously mentioned, many of the lots in the Three Rivers
Estates have similar setback variances as the one being requested. These variances have not
been injurious or detrimental to public welfare. Likewise, the granting of the proposed
variance will not be injurious or detrimental to the public welfare. Given the information
above, it is anticipated that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of the LDRs, and that such variance will not be injurious to the area
involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Page 10 of 11
7) Limitations on subsequent written petition for a variance. No written petition by an owner of
real property for a variance for a particular parcel of property, or part thereof, shall be filed
with the Land Development Regulation Administrator until the expiration of 12 calendar
months from the date of denial of a written petition for a variance for such property, or part
thereof, unless the board of adjustment specially waives said waiting period based upon a
consideration of the following factors:
a. The new written petition constituting a proposed variance different from the one
proposed in the denied written petition.
b. Failure to waive said 12-month waiting period constitutes a hardship to the applicant
resulting from mistake, inadvertence, or newly discovered matters of consideration.
Evaluation and Findings: No application for a variance has been made in respect to the
subject property within the past twelve (12) months.
PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT
Given the applicant is not proposing any additional Recreational Vehicle sites in association with the
campground; there are no impacts to Public Facilities.
Page 11 of 11
RESOLUTION NO. BA V 0302
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF COLUMBIA COUNTY,
FLORIDA, GRANTING A VARIANCE AS AUTHORIZED UNDER SECTION 3.2 OF
THE COLUMBIA COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS AMENDED;
PROVIDING FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS
OF SECTION 4.4.7 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS
AMENDED, TO ALLOW FOR A TWELVE (12) FOOT SOUTH SIDE SETBACK FOR
ALL STRUCTURES AND A SIX (6) FOOT SOUTH SIDE SETBACK FOR THE
EXISTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON CERTAIN LANDS WITHIN THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA; REPEALING ALL
RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Columbia County Land Development Regulations, as amended, hereinafter
referred to as the Land Development Regulations, empowers the Board of Adjustment of Columbia
County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the Board of Adjustment, to grant or to deny variances as
authorized under Section 3.2 of the Land Development Regulations;
WHEREAS, a petition for a variance, as described below, has been filed with the County;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Land Development Regulations, the Board of Adjustment, held
the required public hearing, with public notice having been provided, on said petition for a
variance, as described below, and reviewed and considered all comments received during said
public hearing, including the Concurrency Management Assessment concerning said petition for a
variance, as described below;
WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment, has found that they are empowered under Section 3.2
of the Land Development Regulations to grant or to deny said petition for a variance, as described
below;
WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment, has determined and found that the granting of said
petition for a variance, as described below, would promote the public health, safety, morals, order,
comfort, convenience, appearance, prosperity or general welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment has determined and found that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure,
or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or
buildings in the same zoning district;
b. Such special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant;
c. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant a special privilege
that is denied by the Land Development Regulations to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district;
d. Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Land Development Regulations would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same
zoning district under the terms of the Land Development Regulations and would work
unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant;
e. The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable
use of the land, building or structure; and
Page 1 of 2
f. Granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the
Land Development Regulations, and such variance will not be injurious to the area
involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF COLUMBIA
COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1. Pursuant to a petition, V 0302, by Tana Espenship Norris, owner, to request a variance be
granted from the minimum yard requirements of Section 4.4.7 of the Land Development Regulations
to allow for a 12 foot south side setback for all structures and a 6 foot south side setback for the
existing mechanical equipment. The variance has been filed in accordance with a site plan dated
April 15, 2008 and submitted as part of a petition filed June 22, 2015, to be located on property
described, as follows:
Lot 8, Unit 3 of “Three Rivers Estates,” a subdivision according to the plat thereof
recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 30 of the Public Records of Columbia County, Florida.
Containing 0.38 acres, more or less.
Section 2. All resolutions or portions of resolutions in conflict with this resolution are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 3. Pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Land Development Regulations, the effective date of this
resolution, BA V 0302, shall be 31 days after adoption, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to Section
12.1.1(1) of the Land Development Regulations. No development orders, development permits or
land uses dependent on this resolution may be issued or commence before it has become effective.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED, in special session with a quorum present and voting,
by the Board of Adjustment this 23rd day of July 2015.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF
Attest: COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
Brandon M. Stubbs, Secretary to the Robert F. Jordan, Chairman Board of Adjustment
Page 2 of 2
___ __
FOR PLANNING USE ONLV Application# v_o_3_02_______Columbia County Application Fee $7SO.OO Receipt No.._NI_A___________ Filing Date June 22. 201sGateway to Florida Completeness Date _J_une_2_l._2_0_1s_____
Variance Application A. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. Project Name: Tana Espenship Norris 2. Address ofSubject Property: 960 SW Iowa Drive. Ft. White. Fl 32038 3. Parcel ID Number(s):_00_5_9_1-00_0______________________ 4. Future Land Use Map Designation: Environmentally Sensllive Area ("ESA") 5. Zoning Designation: Environmen!ally Sensitive Area ("ESA") 6. Acreage:_0_.3_8_A_c_re_s______________________________
7. Existing Use of Property:_S_in""g_le_F_a_m_ily__D_w_el_lin'""g'-------------------8. Proposed use of Property:_S_ing_le_F_a_m_ily D_w_el_ing--'-------------------9. Section ofthe Land Development Regulations ("LDRs") for which a Variance is requested
(Provide a Detailed Description): Seclion 4.4.7 'Minimum Yatd Requiremenlli• -The required Sid& s.etbaek ro, all
slruclurn wllnln ~ ESA Zoning District I• 25 root: however. l~o tota ..11t11n the 'Tluee Rivers Estates are too narrow to aecommodale a
2S faot setback. The fu11aiing slrnqte fomUy residence is epprow:im•tely '12 feet tram lhe southerly property boundary. On Man:.h 20. 2014,
a AffllYI w;r:; t»IM co §?'PiDd ao IJdfifoq aorcn AP9dlon Rf thP &JCRIO$[PD lies Wllb(O b 25 fogt !iJdt MtlbiCk A CIURidivt ~Dane, I& being requested since .1 building permit was lssut:!d for the porch expansion and the porch was constructed In 3ccord3nce with the approved building ptmniLThe variance requested is lo .allow for a 12' side setback on the south side for the existing deck, and a 6' side setback on the south side for the existing mechanical equipment (AIC Unit).
B. A~~LA~~t'l:l'n\f'!f.fl!lJ(ATIO\ Owner (title holder} o Agent 2. Name ofApplicant(s): Tana Espenship Norris Title:.__________
Company name (ifapplicable):____________________ Mailing Address:_96_0_SW_l_ow_a_D_riv_e______________________ City: Fe. While State: Fl Zip:._3_20_3_8_____ Telephone:_( 386) 623-9024 Fax:_{_) Email: [email protected]
PLEASE NOTE: Florida bas a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from government officials regarding government business Is subject to public records requests. Your e-mail address and communications may be subject to public disclosure.
3. If the applicant is agent for the property owner•. Property Owner Name (title holder):____________________
Mailing Address=----------------------------City:___________State:_________ Zip:________ Telephone:_(_) Fax:_(_),_____Email:_________
PLEASE NOTE: Florida bas a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from government officials regarding government business Is subject to public records requests. Your e-mail address and comnmnications may be subject to public disclosure. *Must provide an executed Property Owner Affidavit Form authorizing the agent to act on behalfofthe property owner.
C. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Is there any additional contract for the sale of. or options to purchase. the subject property?
Ifyes, list the names of all parties involved: __________________ lf yes, is the contract/option contingent or absolute: o Contingent oAbsolute
2. Has a previous application been made on all or part of the subject property: Future Land Use Map Amendment: oYes !!No------Future Land Use Map Amendment Application No. CPA_____________ Rezoning Amendment: oYes ~No _________ Rezoning Amendment Application No. Z.___________________ Site Specific Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning): o Yes ~No ___ Site Specific Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning) Application No. z.____ Variance: DYes ___________ ~No ______________ Variance Application No. V________________________ Special Exception: uYes ---------Special Exception Application No. SE____________________
D. ATTACHMENT /SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Analysis of Section 12.3.1.2 of the Land Development Regulations ("LDRsw): a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure,
or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district.
b. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these tand development regulations to other lands. buildings. or structures in the same zoning district
d. Literal interpretation of the provisions of these land development regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the tenns of these land development and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant
e. The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure.
f. The grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of these land development regulations, and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
g. Limitations on subsequent written petition for a variance. No written petition by an owner of real property for a variance for a particular parcel of property, or part thereof, shall be filed with the land development regulation administrator until the expiration of 12 calendar months from the date of denial of a written petition for a variance for such property, or part thereof, unless the board of adjustment specially waives said waiting period based upon a consideration of the following factors:
Columbia County- Building and Zoning Department P.O. Box 1529, Lake City, Fl 32056-1529 + (386) 758-1008
Page Z ofS
i. The new written petition constituting a proposed variance different from the one proposed in the denied written petition.
ii. Failure to waive said 12-month waiting period constitutes a hardship to the applicant resulting from mistake, inadvertence, or newly discovered matters of consideration.
2. Vicinity Map - Indicating general location of the site, abutting streets, existing utilities, complete legal description of the property in question, and adjacent land use.
3. Site Plan - Including, but not limited to the following: a. Name, location, owner, and designer ofthe proposed development. b. Present zoning for subject site. c. Location of the site in relation to surrounding properties. including the means of ingress
and egress to such properties and any screening or buffers on such properties. d. Date, north arrow, and graphic scale not less than one inch equal to 50 feet. e. Area and dimensions ofsite (Survey). f. Location of all property lines. existing right-of-way approaches, sidewalks, curbs, and
gutters. g. Access to utilities and points of utility hook-up. h. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed parking areas and loading areas. i. Location, size, and design of proposed landscaped areas (including existing trees and
required landscaped buffer areas}. j. Location and size of any lakes, ponds, canals, orother waters and waterways. k. Structures and major features fully dimensioned including setbacks, distances between
structures. floor area, width of driveways, parking spaces, property or lot lines, and percent of property covered by structures.
I. Location of trash receptacles. m. For multiple-family, hotel, motel, and mobile home park site plans:
i. Tabulation ofgross acreage. ii. Tabulation ofdensity. iii. Number of dwelling units proposed. iv. Location and percent of total open space and recreation areas. v. Percent oflot covered by buildings.
vi. Floor area of dwelling units. vii. Number of proposed parking spaces.
viii. Street layout. ix. Layout of mobile home stands (for mobile home parks only).
Columbia County - Building and Zoning Department P.O. Box 1529, Lake City, Fl 32056-1S29 + (3B6) 758-1008
Page3 ofS
4. Stormwater Management Plan-Including the following: a. Existing contours at one foot intervals based on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Datum. b. Proposed finished elevation of each building site and first floor level. c. Existing and proposed stormwater management facilities with size and grades. d. Proposed orderly disposal ofsurface water runoff. e. Centerline elevations along adjacent streets. f. Water management district surface water management permit
5. Legal Description with Tax Parcel Number.
6. Proof ofOwnership (i.e. deed).
7. Agent Authorization Form (signed and notarized).
8. Proof of Payment of Taxes (can be obtained online via the Columbia County Tax Collector's Office).
9. Fee. The application fee for a Variance Application is $7SO. No application shall be accepted or processed until the required application fee has been paid.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
The Board ofAdjustment shall have the power to authorize, upon appeal, such variance from the terms of the Land Development Regulations as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions. a literal enforcement ofthe provisions ofthese land development regulations will result in unnecessary and undue hardship.
In granting any variance to the provisions ofArticle 4 ofthese land development regulations, the Board ofAdjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with such regulations. including but not limited to, reasonable time limits within which the action for which variance is requested shall be begun or completed, or both. Violation ofsuch conditions and safeguards. when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of these land development regulations.
Under no circumstances shall the Board ofAdjustment grant a variance to permit a use not permitted under the terms ofthe Land Development Regulations in the Zoning District involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms ofthe Land Development Regulations in the Zoning District No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same Zoning District and no permitted use of lands, structures, or buildings in other Zoning Districts shall be considered grounds ror the authorization ofa variance.
Columbia County - Building and Zoning Department P.O. Box 1529, Lake City, Fl 32056·1529 • {386) 758·1008
Page4 ofS
The Board ofAdjustment requires that the applicant or representative be present at the public hearing to address and answer any questions the Board may have during the public hearing. The application may be continued to future dates if the applicant or representative is not present at the hearing.
fourteen (14) copies ofa site plan must accompany an application for a Variance.
The Columbia County Land Development Regulations require that a sign must be posted on the property ten (10) days prior to the Board to Adjustment hearing date. Once a sign has been posted, it is the property owner's responsibility to notify the Planning and Zoning Department if the sign has been moved, removed from the property, torn down, defaced or otherwise disturbed so the property can be reposted. If the property is not properly posted until all public hearings before the Board ofAdjustment are completed, the Board reserves the right to continue such public hearing until such time as the property can be property posted for the required period oftime.
There is a thirty {30) day appeal period after the date of the decision. No additional permitting will be issued until that thirty (30) day period has expired.
I (we) hereby certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true and correct to the best ofmy (our) knowledge and belief.
APPLICANT ACKNOWELDGES THAT THE APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, OTHERWISE THE REQUEST MAYBE CONTINUED TO A FUTURE HEARING DATE.
Applicant/Agent Name (Type or Print)
Applicant/Agent Signature Date
Columbia County- Building and Zoning Department P.O. Box 1529, Lake City. Fl 32056-1529 + (386) 758-1008
Page 5 ofS
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED ~tGR\!S TERRY KcDAVID orf\C\P,l ·. POST 01-'FICE BOX 1328 LAKE CITY, FL 32056-1328 97-13762 RETURN TOJ
TERRY McOAVID POST OFFICE BOX 1328 LAKE CITY, FL 32056-132a 97-481 Grantee 11 s.s. No.~~~~~~
Grantee 12 S.S. No.
Property Appraiear•sParcel Identification No. 7-4s-
WAIIRAll'l'Y DBBD
Recording Fee $ /IJ, !i"boocuma~,,n-,.,:r~R(COkCS t1f c:n,...,r;;;;
1997 SEP 24 PM 2, 56
.: .;,'·,
'- /I --
THIS INDENTURE, made this ~ day of September, 1997,
BETWEEN o. P. DAUGHTRY, III, unmarried, whose post office address
is Route 13! Box 1054, Lake City, Florida 32055, of the County of
Columbia, State of Florida, granter*, and GUERRY BSPENSBIP anC his
wife, TANA ESPENSBIP, whose post office address is Route 13, Box
632, Lake City, Florida 32055, of the County of Columbia, State of
Florida, grantee•.
WITHBSSETB: that said grantor, for and in consideration of
the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable
considerations to said granter in hand paid by said grantee, the
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and
sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever,
the following described land, situate, lying and being in Columbia
County, Florida, to-wit:
Lot 8, Unit 3 of THREE RIVERS ESTATES, a subdivision according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, page 30 of the public records of ColUllbia County,Florida.
SUBJECT TO: Restrictions, easeaents and outstanding ai.neral rights of record, if any, and. taxes for the current year ..
and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land,
and will defend the same against the lawful cla.i.Jas of all peraona
whoasoever.
••Granter• and •grantee• are used for singular or plural, u context requires.
IH lil:TliESS Wlll!REOF, grantor has hereunto set grantor•s hand
and seal the day and year first above written. .1/Document,,y Stamp 3 fiS.tJO lntangit!!e Tall :-e=-P. DeWm Cason Clelil of C By•$et D.C.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: , ~46 PG0582
d(d(j;t7~ A ~cr-1Eeo~,(Fust w1l!ness) o.~ GIITJ(, Tu
DeEtte F, BrownPrinted Name
(~Sit~f!ixJ./1&I, i sa C, Ogburn
Printed Name
STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLUMBIA
The foregoing instrument waa acknowledged before me thia ~ti day of September, 1997, by o. P. DAUGHTRY, III, unmarried, who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath.
My Commission Expires: Notary Pubric Printed, typed, or stamped name:
2
Tax Parcel Number 00591-000
Legal Description:
Lot 8, Unit 3 of “Three Rivers Estates,” a subdivision according to the plat therefore recorded in Plat
Book 4, Page 30 of the Public Record of Columbia County, Florida.
6/22/2015 D_SearchResults
http://g2.columbia.floridapa.com/GIS/D_SearchResults.asp 1/2
Columbia County Property Appraiser 2014 Tax Year updated: 5/1/2015
Parcel: 00000000591000 << Next Lower Parcel Next Higher Parcel >>
Tax Collector Tax Estimator Property Card
Parcel List Generator
Interactive GIS Map Print
Owner & Property Info Search Result: 1 of 1
Owner's Name ESPENSHIP TANA
C/O L C CHRISTIAN ACADEMY Mailing 3035 SW PINEMOUNT RD Address LAKE CITY, FL 32024
Site Address 960 SW IOWA DR
Use Desc. (code) SINGLE FAM (000100)
Tax District 3 (County) Neighborhood 100000
Land Area 0.380 ACRES Market Area 02
NOTE: This description is not to be used as the Legal Description Description for this parcel in any legal transaction. LOT 8 UNIT 3 THREE RIVERS ESTATES ORB 292606, 787186, 8181047, 846581, 9771968.
Property & Assessment Values
2014 Certified Values 2015 Working Values
Mkt Land Value cnt: (0) $40,000.00 Ag Land Value cnt: (1) $0.00 NOTE:
2015 Working Values are NOT certified values and therefore are Building Value cnt: (1) $51,120.00 subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem XFOB Value cnt: (4) $5,126.00 assessment purposes.
Total Appraised Value $96,246.00 Just Value $96,246.00 Class Value $0.00 Assessed Value $67,888.00 Exempt Value (code: HX H3) $42,888.00
Cnty: $25,000
Show Working Values
Total Taxable Value Other: $25,000 | Schl: $42,888
Sales History Show Similar Sales within 1/2 mile
Sale Date OR Book/Page OR Code Vacant / Improved Qualified Sale Sale RCode Sale Price
9/16/1997 846/581 WD I Q $55,000.00
3/1/1996 818/1047 WD I Q $66,000.00
3/1/1994 787/186 WD I Q $66,000.00
Building Characteristics
Bldg Item Bldg Desc Year Blt Ext. Walls Heated S.F. Actual S.F. Bldg Value
1 SINGLE FAM (000100) 1981 AVERAGE (05) 1440 3976 $61,452.00
Note: All S.F. calculations are based on exterior building dimensions.
Extra Features & Out Buildings
Code Desc Year Blt Value Units Dims Condition (% Good) 0296 SHED METAL 0 $500.00 0000001.000 0 x 0 x 0 (000.00)
0190 FPLC PF 0 $1,200.00 0000001.000 0 x 0 x 0 (000.00)
0166 CONC,PAVMT 1993 $828.00 0000552.000 12 x 46 x 0 (000.00)
0084 DOCKRIVER 1981 $2,598.00 0000448.000 0 x 0 x 0 (000.00)
Land Breakdown
6/22/2015 D_SearchResults
http://g2.columbia.floridapa.com/GIS/D_SearchResults.asp 2/2
Lnd Code Desc Units Adjustments Eff Rate Lnd Value
000132 SFR RIVER (MKT) 100 FF (0000000.000AC) 1.00/1.00/1.00/1.00 $400.00 $40,000.00
Columbia County Property Appraiser updated: 5/1/2015
1 of 1
DISCLAIMER This information was derived from data which was compiled by the Columbia County Property Appraiser Office solely for the governmental purpose of property assessment. This information should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of the ownership of property or market value. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the accuracy of the data herein, it's use, or it's interpretation. Although it is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file in the Property Appraiser's office. The assessed values are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem assessment purposes.
6/22/2015 Columbia County Tax Collector
http://flcolumbiataxcollector.governmax.com/collectmax/tab_collect_mvptaxV5.65.asp?PrintView=True&r_nm=tab%5Freport&t_wc=%7Cparcelid%3D116%… 1/2
Columbia County Tax Collector generated on 6/22/2015 10:09:16 AM EDT
Tax Record
Total Millage 16.5231 Total Taxes $540.65
Total Assessments $376.32
Last Update: 6/18/2015 6:00:03 PM EDT
Ad Valorem Taxes and NonAd Valorem Assessments The information contained herein does not constitute a title search and should not be relied on as such.
Account Number Tax Type Tax Year R00591000 REAL ESTATE 2014
Mailing AddressESPENSHIP TANA C/O L C CHRISTIAN ACADEMY3035 SW PINEMOUNT RD LAKE CITY FL 32024
Property Address960 IOWA SW FT WHITE
GEO Number 00000000591000
Exempt Amount Taxable Value See Below See Below
Exemption Detail Millage Code Escrow Code H3 17888
HX 25000
003
Legal Description (click for full description)000000 0100/0100 LOT 8 UNIT 3 THREE RIVERS ESTATES ORB 292606, 787186, 8181047, 846581, 9771968.
Ad Valorem Taxes
Taxing Authority Rate Assessed Value
ExemptionAmount
Taxable Value
Taxes Levied
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 8.0150 67,888 42,888 $25,000 $200.38 COLUMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
DISCRETIONARY 0.7480 67,888 25,000 $42,888 $32.08 LOCAL 4.8840 67,888 25,000 $42,888 $209.46 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1.5000 67,888 25,000 $42,888 $64.33 SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MGT DIST 0.4141 67,888 42,888 $25,000 $10.35 LAKE SHORE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY 0.9620 67,888 42,888 $25,000 $24.05
NonAd Valorem Assessments Code Levying Authority Amount FFIR FIRE ASSESSMENTS $183.32 GGAR SOLID WASTE ANNUAL $193.00
Taxes & Assessments $916.97
6/22/2015 Columbia County Tax Collector
http://flcolumbiataxcollector.governmax.com/collectmax/tab_collect_mvptaxV5.65.asp?PrintView=True&r_nm=tab%5Freport&t_wc=%7Cparcelid%3D116%… 2/2
If Paid By Amount Due $0.00
Date Paid Transaction Receipt Item Amount Paid
11/24/2014 PAYMENT 1200647.0001 2014 $880.29
Prior Years Payment History
Prior Year Taxes Due
NO DELINQUENT TAXES
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
RICK SCOIT GOVCRNOR
CA RLOS LOl'EZ-CANTl:RA 1308 MARTINEZ CENTER LT. GOVl:RNOR
' - ·- -. - .. -- .. -- --- - -·- - - ·-- --
2600 BLAlRSTONE ROAD
T ALL,\HASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2400 HERSCHEL T. VINYARD JR
SECRETARY
SELF CERTIFICATION FOR A STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN UPLANDS SERVING
LESS THAN 10 ACRES OF TOTAL PROJECT AREA AND LESS THAN 2 ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES
Owner(s)/Permittee(s): Tana Espenship File No: 0324761001EG File Name: DECK ADDITION Site Address: 960 SW Iowa Dr
Lake City FL - 32024 County: Columbia Latitude: 30° 6' 2.5019" Longitude: -82° 42' 57.877" Total Project Area: 0.42 Total Impervious Surface Area: 0.03 Approximate Date of Commencement 03 10 2014 of Construction:
Registered Florida Professional: David Winsberg License No.: 68463 Company: Winsberg, Inc.
Date: March 04, 2014
David Winsberg certified through the Department's Enterprise Self-Service Application portal that the project described above was designed by the above-named Florida registered professional to meet the following requirements:
l. The total project area involves less than IO acres and less than 2 acres of impervious surface; 2. No activities will impact wetlands or other surface waters; 3. No activities are conducted in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters; 4. Drainage facihties will not include pipes having diameters greater than 24 inches, or the hydraulic
equivalent, and will not use pumps in any manner; 5. The project is not part ofa larger common plan, development, or sale; and 6. The project does not:
1. Cause adverse water quantity or flooding impacts to receiving water and adjacent lands; 2. Cause adverse impacts to existing surface water storage and conveyance capabilities; 3. Cause a violation of state water quality standards; or
4. Cause an adverse impact to the maintenance of surface or ground water levels or surface water flows established pursuant to s. 373.042 or a work of the district established pursuant to s. 373.086, F.S.
This certification was submitted within approximately 30 days after initiation ofconstruction of the above project. As such, construction, alteration, and maintenance of the stormwater management system serving this project is authorized in accordance with s. 403.814( 12), F.S., and that there is a rebuttable presumption that the discharge from such system will comply with state water quality standards when the stonnwater management system for this project is designed, operated, and maintained in accordance with applicable rules adopted pursuant to part IV of chapter 373, F.S.
Applicants are advised to contact the applicable water management district for requirements that must be followed to properly abandon any existing water wells that need to be removed because they are located where construction is occurring.
1n accordance with s. 373.416(2), F.S., if ownership of the property or the stonnwater management system is sold or transferred to another party, continued operation of the system is authorized only if notice is provided to the Department within 30 days of the sale or transfer.
This notice can be submitted to: FDEP Northeast District 8800 Baymeadows Way West Jacksonville 32256
This certification was submitted along with the following electronic documents:
If you have submitted this certification as a Florida Registered Professional, you may wish to sign and seal this certification, and return a copy to the Department, in accordance with your professional practice act requirements under Florida Statutes.
I, Davjd Wjnsherg, License No. nMfil, do hereby certify that the above information is true and accurate, based upon my knowledge, information and belief. In the space below, affix signature, date, seal, company name, address and certificate ofauthorization (if applicable).
This sealed certification may be submitted to the Department, either electronically (as an attachment in Adobe PDF or other secure, digital format) at [email protected], or as a hardcopy, at the postal address below:
Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection Office ofSubmerged Lands and Environmental Resources 2600 Blair Stone Road MS 2500 Tallahassee FL 32399-2400
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Section 12.3.1.2 of the Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”) establishes standards with which
all Variance applications must be found in compliance with. Staff’s evaluation of the application’s
compliance with the applicable standards of Section 12.3.1.2 of the LDRs is provided below.
1) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in
the same zoning district.
Evaluation and Findings: The subject property is located in a platted subdivision which
was approved by the Board of County Commissioner on May 20, 1976 and does not meet
the current density requirements. The subject property is located in an Environmentally
Sensitive Area (“ESA”) Zone District which has 25 foot side setbacks. The subject
property is very narrow as is very common with the lots in Three Rivers Estates. This
tends to lead to structures being well within the require building setbacks. The existing
dwelling is located approximately 12 feet from the side property boundary on the south.
A deck was permitted on March 20, 2014 and constructed in accordance with the
approved permit. The deck did not protrude into the southerly side setback any further
than the existing single family dwelling. Further, there is existing mechanical equipment
(air conditioning unit) located in the southerly side setback. As the property owner, I’m
requesting a retroactive variance from the southerly side setback from 25 feet to 12 feet
for the existing single family residence and the permitted deck addition, and a retroactive
variance from the southerly side setback from 25 feet to 6 feet for the existing mechanical
equipment (air conditioner).
Given the structures are existing, permitted structures and equipment, there are special
conditions and circumstances which exist that are peculiar to the land, structure, or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in
the same zoning district.
2) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
Evaluation and Findings: There are no special conditions and circumstances that do not
result from the actions of the applicant. The existing deck was permitted through the
Columbia County Building and Zoning Department.
3) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that
is denied by these Land Development Regulations (“LDRs”) to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the same Zoning District.
Evaluation and Findings: The granting of the variance requested will not confer on the
applicant a special privilege that is denied by these LDRs to other lands or structures in
the same Zoning District. Many of the lot within Three Rivers Estates have been granted
variances for the same or similar reason as the variance requested. It is not possible for
the narrow lots within the Three River Estates to meet the setback requirements of the
ESA Zone District.
Page 1 of 2
4) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDRs would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the
LDRs and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
Evaluation and Findings: The literal interpretation of the provisions of the LDRs would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the LDRs and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on
the applicant. The subject property would not be able to be built upon if the literal
interpretation of the provisions of the LDRs were applied; therefore, creating an
unnecessary and undue hardship.
5) The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use
of the land, building, or structure.
Evaluation and Findings: The proposed variance, if approved, would be the minimum
variance allowed given that the single family residence, deck, and mechanical equipment
are already in existence. The variance requested is to allow the existing structures to be
covered via the variance, not for the purpose of allowing construction closer to the
property line.
6) The grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the
LDRs, and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
Evaluation and Findings: As previously mentioned, many of the lots in the Three Rivers
Estates have similar setback variances as the one being requested. These variances have
not been injurious or detrimental to public welfare. Likewise, the granting of the
proposed variance will not be injurious or detrimental to the public welfare. Given the
information above, it is anticipated that the granting of the variance will be in harmony
with the general intent and purpose of the LDRs, and that such variance will not be
injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
7) Limitations on subsequent written petition for a variance. No written petition by an
owner of real property for a variance for a particular parcel of property, or part thereof,
shall be filed with the Land Development Regulation Administrator until the expiration of
12 calendar months from the date of denial of a written petition for a variance for such
property, or part thereof, unless the board of adjustment specially waives said waiting
period based upon a consideration of the following factors:
a. The new written petition constituting a proposed variance different from
the one proposed in the denied written petition.
b. Failure to waive said 12-month waiting period constitutes a hardship to
the applicant resulting from mistake, inadvertence, or newly discovered
matters of consideration.
Evaluation and Findings: No application for a variance has been made in respect to the
subject property within the past twelve (12) months.
Page 2 of 2
' '
'}7JJ. 1_
.[7.• . A ~ • ·•
...
';·'
: ~·' • . rt- 4 •
.: ,<·. ! :
-· ......
"\
' " '
•
·,... r ..\ ... ,-:
..... _, • I ~ 'f • •••
;, ... ., .. "'
DESCRIPnON: Lor B. UNIT .J OF 7HRE£ RIVE:RS ESTATES~ A SUBDMSJON ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PACE JO. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
BOUNDARY SURVEY IN SECTION _.J.6__,
TO WNSHIP_ _fi__SOUTH, RANG[_J_5__£AST.
COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLA.
LOT 17-A
N LOT 9 NOT A PART.NOT
A PART.
S.89'45'W. 193'( P)S.88'4.J'52•£. 181. 10 ' FIELD
SUFN£YOR'S NOT'ES: 1. BOUNDARY 8ASED ON >.IONUU£HTATION F"OUND IN ACCORDA.NC£ WTTH TH£
RCT'RAC£MDIT OF TH£ ORIGINAL. SURV£Y FOR SAID PLAT OF RECORD. 2. BEARINGS BASED ON PLAT OF RECORD USING MONUMENTS FOUNDI ON THE SOUTH UN£ OF SAJO LOT 8. J . THIS PARCEL IS IN ZONE ~ /.ND IS SU8J(CT TO Fl.OODING AS PfRI
I FZ.000 INSURANCE RATE w.P. DATm JANUARY 6, t988,I COUMlfNITY PANEi. NO. 120070 0255 8.
4 , NO £AS£M£NT FDR UTTUTY AND/OR DRAINAGE IS SHOWN ON THIS LOT IN RECORDS IN TH£ POSS£SSJON OF THIS OFFICE.
LOr 18 5. TH£ IMPROV(IJOITS. IF ANY, INDICATED ON THIS SU~ DRAWING ~£LOT 8 I I NOT AS LOCATED ON £lilT£ OF FID.D SURVEY AS SHOWN HEREON. A PART. 6. IF THF:Y EXIST. NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS AND/OR UTTU7T£SCONTAJNS I I W£RE LOCATE:O FOR THIS SURVcY EXC[Pr AS SHOWN HEREON.O. 42 Acres. ± DISTANCE FROM I I 7. "NOT VALJO WITHOur THE SIGNATURE ,I.NO TH£ ORICIHAL RAIS£0 SW
OF A Fl.OR/DA. UC£NS£0 SURVEYOR AND w.PPER. •SEPnc TANK TO .... ~ I~ I 8. CLOSURE OF' f'1£LD SURV£Y JS 1/8,67J.WELL IS 118.8' ±. 9. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOur TH[ BENEFIT OF AN ABSrRACr~ I ~ OR Tm.£ POUCY. THEREFORE [XC£PTION IS MAO£ HEREON REGARDING~:~ I f I EASDl[NTS, RfSERVA noNS. RfSTRICTIONS, /.ND/OR nri.c CONFl.JCTS
.~~ I ~ ,' OF RECORD, IF ANY. NOT PROVIDED BY THE CUENT OR HIS .ACENTS. 10. C£RT1FIEO TO:~ I ~ TANA fSPENSHIP NORRIS ~ ~/ COLUNBIA. BANK.... I £
I ~,o I I I SYMBOL L£G£NO
O.R.I. OFF'ICIAI. RECORD INSTRUMENT • CONCRF:T£ IIOMJUENT FOUND c CONCRF:Tf JJONUJIDiT SET, LS 4708 49':t(F) !O '° l I
I I ".. c.u.I., ... ,. C.IL S.89"45'00-W. • IRON PIN OR PIP[ F'OUNOf\ I I NO ID.NO JO. S.89'~S'W. o .5/B• IRON ROO SCT. LS 4108
SCf.lTH LMC or LOr AS -x-~ FENCE !IOM.AJD(1'ED ND OCQ.A(1) ltOO!lOI . \ I ,' - r- nECTRIC UTlLRY UN[ (oY£RHt:.AD)FtNa UIC OiD5
a$' N~ 1.9 ' W. OF CM. - UC£ - UNO!PCROUND EUCTRIC SE/MC£lltQf" f"OIC£ COltN£R , • , • "" I I -cw- CAB/.£ TV UN£ (OVU?Hf.AD) MARK D. DUREN ANDSOt.mt.. I.2' lt!S1' OT CU. LOT 19 - o- CHAIN LINK FTNC£
LOT 7 \ NOT -•- WOOD£N F!NC£ ASSOCIATES, INC. CNP CORRUCAT£0 ME'fAI. PIP£A PART. RCP R£Jl'IF"DRC£D CONCRCT£ PfP£NOT \ LS tAND SUR'VD"OR 120 NW BURK AVE. STE. 103A PART. LB UCOISCD 8USJN£SS LAKE CITY, FLA 32055
OR8 OF'F1CIAL RECORD BOOK (.386) 758-9831 OFFICEPRJI P£RJ,1,W£:NT R£FERDICE l,l()NUl,IENT£XT'RA A88R£VATION: PCP P!RMANcNT CONTROL POINT (386) 758-8010 FAX (F) FID.D, AS IN tl£LD 9 UTIUTY POLE MWURfMFNI}. R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY(0) DE[[), AS IN 7)ffD NO 10. ND IDENTT/'1CAnONDIMENSION?. Fl.A. 0.0. T. Fl.A. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATTON(P) Pt.Ar, AS IN -PLAT f CENTcRUNEDIJIF:NS/ONj.SIGNED:~~ C.M. CONCR£T£ J,JONUJl£NT(f?) RECORD. AS IN "RECORD I.R. IRON RODMARK D. DUREN, LS 4708 Dl1J£NSl()N I· J.P. lRON PIPE
W0#__{)8_J.B2_____
BOUNDARY SURVEY DESCRtPnON: IN SECTION _ _.16:__, LOT 8. UNIT J OF 7HRE£ RIV[RS £STA1cS". A SUBDMSION TOWNSHIP_ _6__SOUTH, ACCORDING TO TH£ PLAT THEREOF R£CORD£0 IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE JO. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLUMBIA RANG[_l.S,__EAST.COUNrY, FLORIDA. ·NO·~0. COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLA.
LOT 11-ALOT 9 NOT
A Pl.RT. NOT A PART. .\_()- -= ·-i· ..,, ........ -,o, ,p\',rP (/,
S.89'4S'W. 19.J'( P) I;'S.88'4.J's2·£. 181. 10' FIELD I I wooaot
SURVE:'YOR'S NOTfS:I I F'OICC c>£ ,, OIDS , . N.. I. BOUNDARY 8AS£D ON UONUIIENTAOON F'OUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH T1-/£:: a.•·w. or cw. RCTRACDl£NT OF TH[ OR!CINAI.. SURVE:Y F'OR SAID Pu.T OF RECORO. 2. 8£MJNCS BAScO ON PU.T OF RECORD USING JIONUIIDITS F"OUNO
OW THE SOUTH UN[ OF SAID LOT 8. J. THIS PARCa. IS IN ZONE ~ AND IS SU8J£CT TO Fl.000/NC AS Pt"'R
Fl.OCO INSURANC£ RAT[ UAP, 0,l,T£D JANUARY 6, 1988,~ CONIIIJNl'fY PANEl. NO. 120070 0255 8 . IWSC'D fRAJJ[ 4 . NO £ASEJ,,1£NT roR UT1UTY ANO/OR ORAINAC£ IS SHOWN ON THIS LOTSHED IN RECORDS IN rH£ POSSESSION OF THIS OF'T1C£.Lor 1a 5. TH£ fJIPROVDIENTS, IF Al('(. INDICATUJ OW T>-1/S SURVEY DffAwtNC ARE:LOT 8 I I NOT AS LOCATfO ON JJATE: OF 1'1£1.D SURVE:Y AS SHOWN HE:RfON. A PART. 6. IF TH[Y EXIST. NO UNOERCROUND [NCROACHAl£NTS AND/OR ununrsCONTAINS I I 1t!M LOCATW F'OR THIS SURVEY D(C(PT AS SHOWN HEREON.0. 42 Acres, J: DISTANCE FROM I I 7. •NOT VAUD wnHOUT TH£ SIGNATURE ANO 11f£ OR/CINA/. RNS!O SW
OF .4 Fl.OR/DA UCE:NS!D SURVFYOR ,WO /.IAPPER. •SEPTIC TANK TO 8. CLOSURf OF Fl!LD SURVEY IS l/8,67J.~, I ~ I Well IS 118.8' ± . ; I~ 9. THtS SURVEY WAS PR£PAA£0 Wl1HO<IT TH[ 8Dl£t1T or AH ABSTRACT
OR T7Tt.£ POt.lCY. THE:R!FORE D(C(PTION IS MAD( H£R£0N R!CAROINC,*' ' I i I &S£11E:NTS. R£S£RVAT10NS. RE'S'fRICTIONS, ANO/OR mu: COWFI.JCTS OF RECORD, IF ANY. NOT PROYtD£0 BY TH[ CLIENT OR HIS AGENTS.f~ 1 i / 10. C£RTIF1£D TO:
TANA [SP[NSHIP NORRIS t; I i I COLUJJBIA BANK ; I. I
I ~ I I I SYMBOL LfGENO
O.R.I. omctAL R£CORD INSTRU1J£NTI I • Cl)NCR£:T£ /JIONVIJ!NT F'OIJND .f9 'r{F) !Cl oc, 4 • C.IJ . o CONCRITE JIONI.JJl£NT S£T. LS " 708 149.86' Fl£l.O I I... ' • IRON PIN OR PtP! FOUND NO ID.TSO'{P) +j -12' I o 5ft" IRON ROD SET. LS 47Da
-x- lflR(' FFNCE l'OOD()t F£NCC UN£ DID$ \ I / - c- D.ECTmc UTIUTY UH£ (04/£.RHDD)o..,· N.. 1..1· II', or CM. - UC£ - UHOl'RCROUNO EUCTRIC SE/MC£1111'1(" roa COR10t , . , • r l I - av- CA8t.£ TV UN£ (<M:RHEAD) MARK D. DUREN ANDSDUrH. 1.2 · lll!ST or c:w.+/ - 6' LOT 19 - •- CJWN LINK FENCE
LOT 7 \ NOT ASSOCIATES, INC.-•- 'MX)()£N rrNCC (' CJIP CORRUCATCD UF:TAI. PtP£A PART.NOT RCP R£JNFORCED CONCRCTE PiPf
LS I.ANO SURVEYOR 1 20 NW BURK AVE. STE. 1OJA PART. \ LB UCCNSCD 8USIHESS LAKE CITY, FlA J2055ORB OF'F1CIAJ. RECORO 800K (386) 758-98.31 OFFICEPR/J PCRIIAM:NT R£FER!NC£ IIONUIJ!NT
aT1V, A88R£VAT10N: PCP P£RI.IAN£NT C0WTR0t. POINT (.386) 758-8010 FAX (f) nao. AS IN ";}[LO e UTILITY POI.£ nno SURVEY Q.\tr NS rL.212rL_U!ISURnt!Nt). R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY ~TtDAA~~~4~1004"""'!'==:--~~0 1 ,_, JO IO (0) 0££D, AS IN 7>££0 NO 10. NO ID£JmF1CAnoN fOR---161:J,4~
GRAPHIC SCALE {)Ql£HS/Olv ?. F1.A D.O. T. Fl.A DEPT. OF TRANSPORTAT10N(P) ~T. AS IN i>U.T F'IO.D ~ACE [Q 11 f C!NTcRLIN£bl1J£NSJOH?, WWN BY V. DUBDi/A DYALSIGNED:~..Lf?~ C.AI. CONCR£T£ MOHUJ/CNT(R) RECORD, AS IN "'RECORD LR. IRON RODMARK D. OUREN, LS 4708 OIJl£NSION?. W0# _ _ {)8_JB2 ____ _
LP. IRON PIP£
THE lAKE CITY REPORTER Legal Copy As PublishedLake City, Columbia County, Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNTY OF COLUMBIA, CONCERNING A VARIANCE AS PROVIDED FOR IN TIIE COLUM-BIA COUNTY LAND DEVELOP-Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Todd Wi 1 son MENT REGULATIONS BY THE BOARD OF ADJUST-who on oath says that he is Publisher of the Lake City Reporter, a newspaper published at MENT OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to the Colum-bia County Land Development Reg-ulations, as amended, hereinafter re-
~~-~'.~·--~~'.~:.b'..~t:.:i;;fu~--~·.:.~.,:~:;z.4J:~.~~:-~-~~-~-~~~·:..~i~=-~.: m the matter of ........~~:l)Jtf.p........ ..1~........~ .. ..................... ferred to as the Land Development
Regulations, as amended, objections, ...... " ........""............. " ...........""." ...".... .. ....""..." ..............."."........ " ..-~- .." ........... recommendations and comments concerning the variance, as described below, will be heard by the Board of Adjustment of Columbia County,Florida, at a public hearing on July23, 2015, at 7:00 p.rn., or as soon thereafter as the matters can be heard, in the School Board Adminis-trative Complex located at 312 West Duval Street, Lake City, Florida. V 0302, a petition by Tana Espen-ship Norris, owner, to reques~ ~ var-itlnce--be graoteEI from the mmnnum yard requirements of Section 4.4.7 of the Land l!levelepment Regulations to allow for a 12 foot soqth side set-back for all structures and a 6 footAffiant further says that The Lake City Reporter is a newspaper published at Lake south side setback for the existing mechanical equipment. The varianceCity in said Columbia County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been has been filed in accordance with a
continuously published in said Columbia County, Florida, and has been entered as second site plan dated April 15, 2008 and submitted as part of a petition filed class mail matter at the post office in Lake City, in said Columbia County, Florida, for a Jutte 22, 2015, to be located on prop-erty described, as follows:period of one year next preceding the· first publication of the attached copy of advertise- Lot 8 Unit 3 of "Three Rivers Es-
ment: and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor pro ised any person, firm or tates/ a subdivision according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Bqok 4,corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund the ng t Page 30 of the Public Records of Co-lumbia County, Florida. advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Containing 0.38 acres, more or less. The public hearing may be continued to one or more future dates. Any in-
---- terested party shall be advised that the date, time and place of any con-tinuation of the public hearing shall be announced during the public hear-ing and that no further notice con-cerning the matter will be publish~unless said continuation exceeds six
Notary Public · calendar weeks from the date of the above referenced public hearing. At the aforementioned public hear-ing, all interested parties may appear to be heard with respect to the var-iance. Copies of the variance are available for public inspection at the Office. of the County Planner, County Admin-istrative Offices located at 135 Northeast Hernando Avenue, Lake City, Florida, during regular business hours. All persons are advised that if theydecide to appeal any decision made at the above referenced public hear-ing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such pur-pose, they may ne~ to ensure.that.a verbatim record of the proceedings IS made which record includes the tes-timo~y and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. . In accordance with the Amencans with Disabilities Act, persons need-ing a special accommodation or an interpreter to participate ~ the pro-ceeding should contact Lisa K. B. Roberts, at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the hearing. Ms. Rob-em may be contacted by telephone at (386)758-1005 or by TelCCOl!l1IlU-nication Device for Deaf at (386)758-2139.
10740384 July 10, 2015
{;T~~
PUBLIC NOTICE: ~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to the Columbia County Land Development Regulations, as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Land Development Regulations, as amended, objections, recommendations and comments concerning the variance, as described below, will be heard by the Board ofAdjustment of Columbia County, Florida, at a public hearing on July 23, 2015, at 7;00 p.m.. or as soon thereafter as the matters can be heard, in the School Board Administrative Complex located at 372 West Duval Street, Lake City, Florida.
V 0302, a petition by Tana Espenship Norris, owner, to request a variance be granted from the minimum yard requirements of Section 4.4.7 of the Land Development Regulations to allow for a 12 foot south side setback for all structures and a 6 foot south side setback for the existing mechanical equipment. The variance has been filed in accordance with a site plan dated April 15, 2008 and submitted as part ofa petition filed June 22, 2015, to be located on property described, as follows:
Lot 8, Unit 3 of "Three Rivers Estates," a subdivision according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 30 of the Public Records of Columbia County, Florida. Containing 0.38 acres, more or less.
At the aforementioned public hearing, all interested parties may appear to be heard with respect to the variance.
Copies of the variance are available for public inspection at the Office of the County Planner, County Administrative Offices located at 135 Northeast Hernando Avenue, Lake City, Florida, during regular business hours.
All persons are advised that if they decide to appeal any decision made at the above referenced public hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing a special accommodation or an interpreter to participate in the proceeding should contact Lisa K. 8. Roberts, at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the hearing. Ms. Roberts may be contacted by telephone at (386)758-1005 or by Telecommunication Device for Deaf at (386)758-2139.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT BRANDON M. STUBBS, COUNTY PLANNER AT
(386) 754-7119
