color categorization and language
DESCRIPTION
Color categorization and language. Sayaka Abe. Overview. I. Language and categorization II. Prototype theory III. Color: classic studies IV. Criticisms V. Further issues. I. Language and categorization. Why linguists care about cognition? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Color categorization and language
Sayaka Abe
![Page 2: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
OverviewI. Language and categorization
II. Prototype theory
III. Color: classic studies
IV. Criticisms
V. Further issues
![Page 3: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
I. Language and categorization
Why linguists care about cognition?
Observing language allows us to see underlying coginitive patterns of human mind
![Page 4: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Q1. What kind of concepts can language encode or cannot encode?
a. Grammar (closed-class items)
Mary walked to a park.
b. Lexicon (open class items)
![Page 5: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
-ed PAST past present future
to DESTINATION
a SINGULAR, INDEFINITE (discourse)
No languages can express size, length, shape, colors, etc with closed-class items. (Talmy 2000 I)
a. Grammar (closed-class)
‘6 hours ago’
![Page 6: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
b. Lexicon (open-class)
Mary: name of a personBill, John, Kathy, etc.
walk: actionrun, sleep, study, etc.
park: place school, station, friend’s home, etc.
![Page 7: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Q2. What are universal and language(culture)-specific linguistic
meanings?
e.g. SEE (Wierzbicka)(a semantic primitive)
‘snow’ (Boaz 1911)English 1: snowEskimo 4: aput ("snow on the ground"), gana ("falling
snow"), piqsirpoq ("drifting snow"), and qimuqsuq ("snowdrift")
tense markers English – 3: present, past, future
Hopi - no tense marker
![Page 8: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Q3. Does language affects thought? Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (lingusitic determinism)
e.g. Can the speakers of a language with 12 words for ‘snow’ more readily perceive different types of snow than the speakers of a language with only 2 words?
Or thought affect language?
![Page 9: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
“Observing language”
1. Looking at the way language is structured (lexicon, grammar) by referring to grammar books, fieldwork
2. Looking at behavioral property (naming tasks by experiments, fieldwork, etc.)
![Page 10: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Naming of things as indication of cultural significance
‘ume’
‘Japanese plum’
‘some small round fruit’
![Page 11: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
II. Prototype TheoryWhy prototype theory?
Problems with necessary and sufficient conditions
Man: +ADULT, +HUMAN, +MALE Woman: +ADULT, +HUMAN, –MALE
BUTbachelor: +unmarried +male √ A single 20 year old male? 5-year-old boy? Pope
![Page 12: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
• Many words cannot be defined by a set of necessary and sufficient conditions
• Instead, it is more reasonable to think of a concept in terms of a ‘best’ (prototypical) example or ‘peripheral’ examples
![Page 13: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Which one is a typical ‘bird’?
![Page 14: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Features of the prototypical ‘bird’neither necessary nor sufficient!
1. Has feathers2. Has a beak.3. Can fly4. Lays eggs.5. Small6. Builds a nest in a tree7. Eats seeds or worms.8. Makes ‘tweet-tweet’ noises
• Note that the feature: ‘Able to be ridden’ is NOT on the list above.
![Page 15: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Structure of the category ‘bird’ (North American)
![Page 16: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Which ones are prototypical ‘chairs’?
![Page 17: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
What is prototypical may vary depending on the language, culture
or individual.
e.g. Prototypical ‘food’ in different cultures
![Page 18: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
American food
![Page 19: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Japanese tabemono ‘food’
![Page 20: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Summary
Point 1. Different languages have different ways (numbers of words) of distinguishing the objects or thoughts.(e.g. ‘snow’ example)
Point 2. Speakers of different languages have
different prototypical examples of a category.(e.g. ‘food’ to Americans and Japanese)
![Page 21: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Question
Are these true for all the categorization phenomena?
How about color?
![Page 22: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
II. ColorColor terms have been studied to explore the way humans
cross-culturally classify and group universal aspects of the physical world.
Real world:There is a continuous gradation of color from one end of
the color spectrum to the other. There are no natural breaks, no discrete categories.
Language:Languages differ in the number of colors they distinguish. Language carves up the color spectrum into discrete
categories.
![Page 23: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Berlin and Kay (1969)
1. Informants of 98 languages2. Used Munsell color chips 330 color
samples as stimuli
![Page 24: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
1. Color term inventory
Had subjects give color terms for given stimuli.
e.g. What is this called?
![Page 25: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Claim 1• There is a universal inventory of 11 basic color
categories, and all languages use either these 11 or fewer.
white, black, red, green, yellow, blue, brown, purple, pink, orange and grey
• Basic=– Single morpheme (no light brown)– Were in common use (no sage)– Did not have a limited distribution (no blond)– Were not contained within another color (no scarlet)
![Page 26: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Claim 2
• There is an implicational hierarchy of the inventory of color terms.
![Page 27: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Color term inventories• If 2 black and white
e.g. Dani (Papuan) and Burarra (Australian)
• If 3 black, white and red
Note: no languages distinguished less than two colors
![Page 28: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
• What color terms are expressed in Shona?– Black,white, red, and
yellow or green.• What color terms are
expressed in Bassa?– Black and white
White
Black
Green
Yellow
[Red] [Brown][Blue]
PurplePinkOrangeGray
![Page 30: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
2. Focal color
Which one is the best example of _____?
People across different languages more or less agree with what the prototypical example of given categories.
www.daicolor.co.jp/english/color_e/color_e01.html
![Page 31: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Claim 3
There are universal constraints, rather than relativistic effects, in the domain of color.
![Page 32: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Follow up studies (1)Heider 1972 (Rosch): A high degree of agreement on focal
colors was confirmed.- Behavioral correlates of focal colors
- Named focal colors more rapidly- The given names for focal colors are shorter
- Short-term memory task: Suggest that color memory is indeed aided by the existence of the relevant color terms in one’s language
Dani (2 color terms) and English - Long-term memory task: Dani speaker’s learned focal
color terms faster than non-focal ones.- Black was named most rapidly of all.
![Page 33: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Follow up studies (2)Kay and McDaniel (1978) Additional contributions• Proposes the category ‘grue’ in place of green
and blue.Zulu (Bantu language) does not
distinguish between green and blue“grue like the sky” “grue like the grass”
Basically supports Berlin and Kay“…basic color categories can be derived from the neural response patterns that underlie the perception of color”
![Page 34: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
What can we say about categorization of colors?
Point 1. Different languages have different ways (numbers of words) of distinguishing things in the world. Yes
Point 2. Speakers of different languages have different prototypical examples of a category. No, according to Berlin and Kay, etc.
![Page 35: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Implications of the studies above
• Sapir-Whorf hypothesis valid? not with color perception
“…in the case of color at least… it is perception that determines language.”
![Page 36: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
IV. Criticisms of Berlin and Kay Criticism (Sahlins 1976, Wierzbicka 1990, Lucy 1996, etc.):- Words are not simply labels for perceived stimuli. - The setting of B + K’s tasks, i.e. basic color terms tested
on color chips, are artificial.- That is, color terms on a given culture do not mean
Munsell chips.
What the color of is inseparable from what we call ‘color’ and is culturally more significant.
![Page 37: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Limit of “colors” in real life“It is only in comparatively recent times, and only in
technologically advanced societies, that it has been possible for a vast range of diverse colours to be applied, through industrial processing, to things. In the world of nature, things are typically associated with quite narrow segments of the colour continuum.”
e.g. blood it red, milk is white, charcoal is black, etc.“…it is not really surprising that color terms should refer,
primarily to rather restricted portions of the spectrum.” (Taylor 1989)
Equally, the cross-language stability of color focality may well have as much to do with the stability of the attributes of certain kinds of things, as with neurological processes of perception (cf. Wierzbicka 1980b)
![Page 38: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
‘Colors’ vs ‘properties of an object’?
‘pink’
or
‘the look of sakura (cherry blossoms)’
![Page 39: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
What’s ‘color’ anyway?
Wierzicka 2006 (Semantics of color: a new paradigm)
Universality of the notion of ‘color’ itself should be questioned.
![Page 40: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Burarra “color” terms
“black” and “white”
Jones and Meehan (1978)-gungaltja ‘light, brilliant and white colors’
‘highly saturated red’
-gungundja ‘other colors: dark, dull and black colours’
![Page 41: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
• Despite their use of the words ‘colour’, Jones and Meehan’s own observations show that the distinction is not based on colour at all.
Rather, ‘brightness’ and ‘lightness’
*Burarra people have no concept of ‘white’ and no concept of ‘a warm color’
![Page 42: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
“Color” can be expressed using natural language, in particular, using the terms of SEEING (which is a primitive)
- ‘X looks like Y’ mechanism - ‘high visibility’ and ‘low visibility’
![Page 43: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Hypothesis (Wierzbicka)
X is –gungaltja =a. some things are like this:b. when people see a place where these things
are, they can always see these thingsc. the sun[M] is always like thisd. fire[M] is always like thise. at some times, blood is always like thisf. X is like this
![Page 44: Color categorization and language](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051403/568160d0550346895dd005e9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
V. Further Issues
• Colors in contexts, as a group
• Warm tones vs. cooler tones
• Color with other attributes (e.g. shapes)
• Incorporatinng into a theory of subjectivity?