colonic diverticular disease
DESCRIPTION
Colonic Diverticular DiseaseColonic Diverticular DiseaseColonic Diverticular DiseaseTRANSCRIPT
-
Please ciGastroen
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 10Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;xxx(xx):xxx---xxx
www.elsevier.es/gastroenterologia
Gastroenterologa y Hepatologa
PROGRE
Colonic diverticular disease. Treatment and prevention
Carla J.
a Digestive b Aragon Hec Universityd CIBERehd,
Received 4
KEYWODiverticuDiverticuTreatmePreventiRifaximiMesalaziProbiotic
PALABREnfermediverticuDiverticuTratamiePrevenciRifaximiMesalaziProbiotic
CorrespoE-mail ad
http://dx.d0210-5705/te this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Colonic diverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.terol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2015.03.010
Gargallo Puyueloa,b,, Federico Sopenaa,b,c,d, Angel Lanas Arbeloaa,b,c,d
Diseases Service, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spainalth Research Institute (IIS Aragn), Zaragoza, Spain
of Zaragoza, Spain Zaragoza, Spain
February 2015; accepted 11 March 2015
RDSlar disease;litis;nt;on;n;ne;s
Abstract Diverticular disease represents the most common disease affecting the colon inthe Western world. Most cases remain asymptomatic, but some others will have symptomsor develop complications. The aims of treatment in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticulardisease are to prevent complications and reduce the frequency and intensity of symptoms.Fibre, probiotics, mesalazine, rifaximin and their combinations seem to be usually an effectivetherapy. In the uncomplicated diverticulitis, outpatient management is considered the optimalapproach in the majority of patients, and oral antibiotics remain the mainstay of treatment.Admission to hospital and intravenous antibiotic are recommended only when the patient isunable to intake food orally, affected by severe comorbidity or does not improve. However,inpatient management and intravenous antibiotics are necessary in complicated diverticulitis.The role of surgery is also changing. Most diverticulitis-associated abscesses can be treated withantibiotics and/or percutaneous drainage and emergency surgery is considered only in patientswith acute peritonitis. Finally, patient related factors, and not the number of recurrences, playthe most important role in selecting recipients of elective surgery to avoid recurrences. 2015 Elsevier Espaa, S.L.U. and AEEH y AEG. All rights reserved.
AS CLAVEdadlar;litis;nto;n;na;na;os
Enfermedad diverticular clica. Tratamiento y prevencin
Resumen La enfermedad diverticular es la enfermedad clica ms frecuente en el mundoOccidental. La mayora de los pacientes permanecern asintomticos a lo largo de su vida,pero un porcentaje no despreciable presentarn sntomas o desarrollarn complicaciones. Elobjetivo del tratamiento en la enfermedad diverticular no complicada sintomtica es prevenirlas complicaciones y reducir la frecuencia e intensidad de los sntomas. La bra, los probiticos,la mesalazina, la rifaximina y sus combinaciones parecen ser terapias ecaces. En la divertic-ulitis no complicada, el manejo extrahospitalario se considera actualmente el manejo ptimo,siendo los antibiticos administrados por va oral la piedra angular del tratamiento. El ingreso
nding author.dress: [email protected] (C.J. Gargallo Puyuelo).
oi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2015.03.010 2015 Elsevier Espaa, S.L.U. and AEEH y AEG. All rights reserved.SS IN ENDOSCOPY
-
Please ciGastroen
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 102 C.J. Gargallo Puyuelo et al.
hospitalario solo ser necesario en pacientes con intolerancia oral, comorbilidad grave oausencia de mejora. Sin embargo, el manejo intrahospitalario es preciso en las diverticuli-tis complicadas. La mayora de los abscesos podrn ser tratados con antibiticos y/o drenajepercutneo, reservando la ciruga urgente para pacientes con peritonitis aguda. La indicacin deciruga electiva para prevencin de recurrencias debe ser indidualizada y no basarse nicamente
diver y AE
Introduc
Diverticulamon diseasThe prevalthe past cof changesover all phlence increadults youn80 years ofdiverticulitber from sodiameter, bprimarily in90% of patithe rest of
There abe used incolon in thticulosis omay be sycolonic divtion of thto complicdiverticulitof the devthe divertiticular dise
Studies that a larg80%) will rthe 15---20%eventually ular diseashave an etalization athe majoribleeding.2--
Physiopa
A colonic dcosa, correpenetrate anisms of however it
d to genein thg. 1s hyp
precientminaat ar
narrowthforato deertic
wason thventsitioly ch
and ioloch aing.1
reasity,
assoUDDce tondiusc
nic, ory-t anould-gra
ecal c lowary
altend inen el nmero de episodios previos de 2015 Elsevier Espaa, S.L.U. y AEEH
tion
r disease of the colon represents the most com-e affecting the large bowel in the Western world.ence of diverticular disease has increased overentury throughout the world, probably because
in lifestyle, such as smoking, overweight, andysical inactivity and low bre diet. The preva-ases with age, ranging from approximately 5% inger than 40 years of age to 50---70% among those
age or older; 80% of patients who present withis are 50 or older. Diverticula can present in num-litary to hundreds, they are typically 5---10 mm inut can exceed 2 cm in size. Diverticulosis occurs
the sigmoid and descending colon in more thanents, but may be prevalent in varying degrees in
the colon.1
re several diverticular-related terms that will this review. The presence of diverticula in thee absence of overt inammation is called diver-r uncomplicated diverticular disease (UDD). Itmptomatic or asymptomatic. The term acuteerticulitis (ACD) is used to describe inamma-e diverticula, which may or may not progressations (complicated ACD). There is also chronicis, because of recurrent diverticulitis or becauseelopment of a segmental colitis associated withcula. Summarily, the clinical spectrum of diver-ase is wide.on the natural history of the disease point oute majority of patients with diverticula (aboutemain asymptomatic throughout their life. Of
who develop symptoms, approximately 1/4 willhave an episode of symptomatic painful divertic-e without inammation, and up to 10---25% willpisode of ACD. About 1---2% will require hospi-nd 0.5% surgery. Diverticula are responsible for
ty (24---42%) of episodes of lower gastrointestinal-4
relatebiota, result See Fifamouexcessinsufintralutrude in theovergrto pertried ting divof UDDBased to preand porecentintakeepidemesis suemergan incinactiv
Theease (evidenbe a cneuroma chroa sensopmenora cfor lowthe fachronisic primThese phy, ate this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Colonic dterol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.201
thology and symptom development
iverticulum is a herniation of mucosa and submu-sponding to a weak point where the vasa rectithe tunica muscularis. The pathogenetic mech-diverticular disease are still poorly understood,
is generally recognized that these are probably
nally, to sAs we m
ticulosis recomplicatiwe focus ondepend on foration, tbodys abilticulitis.G. Todos los derechos reservados.
complex interactions among diet, colonic micro-tic factors, colonic motility and structure thateir formation of colonic diverticula over time.5
. In 1971, Painter and Burkitt published theirothesis that diverticular disease was caused by
ssure in the colon due to segmentation based on intake of dietary bre. In response to increasedl pressure, outpouchings may develop and pro-eas of potential weakness.6 Stasis or obstructionow necked diverticulum may lead to bacterial
and local tissue ischaemia ultimately leadingion.7 Since then, numerous observational studiesmonstrate the possible effect of bre on prevent-ular disease. Most of them concluded that the risk
inversely associated with dietary bre intake.8---10
ese evidences, a high bre diet is recommended diverticular disease in most current guidelinesn papers.11---15 However, this hypothesis has beenallenged since: (1) the inverse association of brediverticulosis has been questioned in some recentgical studies16,17 and (2) new pathogenic hypoth-s the neuropathic and myopathic hypothesis are8---22 Other factors that have been associated withed risk of diverticular disease include physicalconstipation, obesity, and smoking.23---27
ciation between uncomplicated diverticular dis-) and symptoms is uncertain. There is someo suggest that painful diverticular disease maytion related to inammation and its effects onular function in the colon.22---28 The presence oflow-grade intestinal inammation would inducemotor dysfunction, leading to symptom devel-d/or persistence. Changes in intestinal micro
be one of the putative mechanisms responsiblede inammation. Bacterial overgrowth aided bystasis inside the diverticula could contribute to-grade inammation that sensitizes both intrin-
efferent and extrinsic primary afferent neurons.rations could lead to smooth muscle hypertro-creased sensitivity to abdominal distension, andiverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.5.03.010
ymptom development.3,22 See Fig. 1.entioned above, most people with colonic diver-main asymptomatic, but eventually can developons as ACD or diverticula bleeding. In this article
ACD. The clinical manifestation of this event willa number of factors, including the size of the per-he level of extracolonic contamination, and theity to contain this contamination.29,30
-
Please ciGastroen
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 10Colonic diverticular disease 3
Geneticpredisposition Colonic motility
sis
EnvironmentalinfluencesDiet, microbiota Natural degenerationAltered receptor
sensitivity
Figure 1 latedcolon struc matoSource: Ada
Managem
Managem(UDD)
In patientsbe recommt in preveis no evide
There isymptomainal pain, by defecatare nauseaof patientstherapeutiwill becomdevelop co
Five agFig. 2):
A) High bSeveral ranventional sUDD, but is recommtomatic UDthe curren
B) AntibiotThe rationUDD is notchanges in
ontrtionn ordcrobal ris
mos
in. withecreaFecal impactionmicroperforation
Postinflammatoryhypersensitivity
Chronic symptomsPain, diarrhea, constipation
Development of diverticulo
Diverticulitis
Symptoms development in diverticular disease is probably reture, intestinal motility low grade inammation and postinampted from Humes and Spiller.3
ent of diverticular disease
ent of uncomplicated diverticular disease
with asymptomatic UDD,2 a high bre diet mayended because of its possible prophylactic bene-nting symptomatic UDD and complications. Therence that other drugs are useful in these patients.
could cproduction. Iantimiminimbe theposed.Rifaximlogue may dte this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Colonic dterol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.201
s more evidence on the benet of treatment intic UDD. The most frequent symptom is abdom-which may be exacerbated by eating and easedion or the passage of atus. Other symptoms, diarrhoea, constipation and bloating. Over 61%
with symptomatic UDD who are not taking anyc measure to prevent recurrence of symptomse symptomatic within 1 year, and about 4% willmplications.31
ents have been proposed for treatment (see
er diet or bulking agentsdomized controlled trials (RCT) and other inter-tudies evaluate the effect of bre in symptomaticwith inconsistent results.32---37 In any rate, breended in the prevention and treatment of symp-D, as well as in the prevention of ACD by most oft guidelines and position papers.11---15
ic therapyale for the use of antibiotics in symptomatic
clearly established. Recent studies suggest that gut microbiota (intestinal bacterial overgrowth)
faecal masThis antibprole.33,38
non-entericand the ristwo doubleof cyclic asymptoms and two meconcluded ing symptoof patientscompared The numbeplacebo to Summary, tbination of1 week eve
C) ProbiotiProbiotics asal gut odisease duCircular/longitudinalmuscle thickening
to complex interactions among genetic features,ry hypersensitivity.
ibute to symptoms development due to excessive of bowel gas through carbohydrate fermenta-er to avoid systematic effects, poorly absorbedials that act against enteric pathogens but havek of systematic toxicity or side effects seem tot appropriate antibiotics. Rifaximin has been pro-
Rifaximin is a non-systematic rifamycin ana- a broad spectrum of activity in vitro. Rifaximinse metabolic activity of bowel ora, increasingiverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.5.03.010
s, and may also eradicate bacterial overgrowth.iotic has a high safety and high tolerabilityPlasma level of rifaximin is minimum, therefore
pathogens are not exposed to selective pressurek of bacterial resistance is low.39 Three open and
blind RCTs40---44 have examined the effectivenessdministration of rifaximin and bre in reducingcompared with bre alone. A systematic reviewta-analysis have analysed these trials.44---46 Theythat combined treatment is effective in obtain-m relief at 1 year in patients with UDD. 35%
treated with bre alone were asymptomaticwith 64% in groups of combined treatment.r needed to treat was three for rifaximin vs.relieve symptom and nine to avoid complications.he best results have been obtained using a com-
soluble bre, such as glucomannan, and rifaximinry month.
csre live microorganisms that can restore commen-ra that may have been altered in diverticulare to stasis and reduced colonic transit time.47
-
Please ciGastroen
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 104 C.J. Gargallo Puyuelo et al.
High fiber diet Lower the intraluminal pressure Prevent formation of additional diverticula
fr
Decrease metabolic activity of instinalbacterial flora
Mechanisms of action
r dis
Unfortunatuse in symand unconimproveme
Probioti5-aminosalducted thror combinappeared tUDD but thRCT publisboth cyclicparticularlfor maintasummary, tnot allow d
D) 5-ASA: MesalazineIn 2010, Greview thadiverticulabe effectieveryday mto preventnecessary placebo-coeffective iUDD.56 Alsa benet fon prevent
intaitic L
ichopermUncomplicateddiverticular
disease
Rifaximin
Probiotic
Mesalazine Mechanisms of action
Mechanisms of action
Mechanisms of action
Figure 2 Treatment of uncomplicated diverticula
ely, there are few data available about itsptomatic UDD and most of studies are smalltrolled. The majority of them show symptomsnt.48---50
cs have also studied in combination withicylate (5-ASA). Tursi and colleagues have con-
in maprobio
E) AntThe hite this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Colonic dterol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.201
ee RCTs comparing 5-ASA alone, probiotic aloneation therapy.51---53 Both 5-ASA and probioticso be effective for the prevention of symptomaticeir combination was better. A recent double-bindhed by this same scientic group concluded that
mesalazine and Lactobacillus casei subsp DG,y in combination, seem to be better than placeboining remission of symptomatic UDD.54 But, inhe poor study designs and small size of them doenitive conclusions.
mesalazine has anti-inammatory and antioxidant effects.atta et al.,55 published a Cochrane systematict evaluated the role of 5-ASA in patients withr disease. Authors concluded that 5-ASA mayve in the treatment of this disease and thatesalazine was better than cyclic administration
relapse. High quality well-designed RCTs areto conrm their observations. In fact, the rstntrolled double-blind trial found mesalazinen obtaining pain relief in patients with acuteo, there are two interesting RCTs that showedor mesalazine compared with rifaximin in termsing symptomatic recurrence and similar success
antispasmomight imprtion. But, t
F) Avoid NSeveral corisk factor ration anddevelop sy(RR: 1.5, Ccated divercompared tthis increaimpaired btranslocati
G) Levels oIt seems twith geogrMaguire et ies that shUV light extus) are aMore high recommenInhibition factors of inflammatory cascade andee redicalsAntioxidant effect
Decrease hydrogen and methane production Increase fecal mass Erradication of bacterial overgrowht
Competitive metabolic interations with pro-inflammatory organism Inhibiton of adherence and traslocaton ofpathogens Block activation of pro-inflammatorymolecules Inmunomodulation (innate and adaptative) Metabolic changes
ease. Mechanisms of action.
ning long-term remission compared with theactobacillus casei.53,57
linergic/antiespasmodic agentsotility of the colon in diverticulosis suggests thaniverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.5.03.010
dic agents such as dicyclomine and hyoscyamineove symptoms by decreasing muscular contrac-here are no RCTs that conrm this benet.
SAIDs treatmentntrolled studies have shown that NSAIDs are afor the development of symptoms, ACD, perfo-
bleeding.7,58---60 NSAID users have more risk tomptomatic diverticular diseases than non-usersI 95%: 1.1---2.1).58 And in patients with compli-ticular diseases there was a larger use of NSAIDso controls without disease. It was postulated thatsed risk was due to mucosal damage resulting inarrier function of the colonic mucosa allowingon of bacteria, which provoke inammation.
f vitamin Dhat the incidence of ACD has been associatedaphic and seasonal variation. Because of that,al. conducted two interesting observational stud-owed that lower levels of vitamin D and lowposure (UV exposure determines vitamin D sta-ssociated with signicantly higher risk of ACD.quality studies are necessary before making adation.61,62
-
Please ciGastroen
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 10Colonic diverticular disease 5
Acute colonic diverticulitis (ACD)
cm) : ivB plus
ey Ib
ute c
Treatmen
Although mtomatic, itdevelop annosis is notare indicatwithout sigin lower lC reactivediagnosis.6
tional strafollowed bis inconclutive approa50%. In 197which was ACD; stagecolic inamthe primaror retroperinammatistage IV, fa
TreatmentThe majorconservativOutpatientthe healthria for inp(include poral uids,severe combe sufcieinuencedusually rec
One of of uncompA recent
o msupprecoore,le. Pgns aemd retics
cepe, gn ofresced,
othantanou, client.tic
foodprovUcomplicated (ACD)
Inmunocompromised patient? Signs of generalized infection? Affected general condition? Severe comorbidity? Advanced age?
Small abcesses (50 mg/l, may be sufcient for the4,65 If imaging is indicated, probably, a condi-tegy with ultrasound as rst line technique andy computerized tomography (CT), if ultrasoundsive or doubtful, may represent the most effec-ch. The number of CT exams may be reduced by8, Hinchey et al. proposed a classication of ACD,modied later.66,67 It distinguishes ve stages of
0, clinically mild diverticulitis, stage I (a: peri-mation and b: abcess
-
Please ci nic dGastroen .201
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 106 C.J. Gargallo Puyuelo et al.
considered standard therapy for these patients. The choiceof operation is inuenced by patient conditions, operativendings and the surgeons experience. In critically illpatients with haemodynamic instability, Hartmanns proce-dure is recommended. However, in haemodynamically stablepatients, pcal diversio
Traditioendoscopy tal cancer.opinions. Rreview75---80
rather low.tive stratepatients wcious CT recommen
Managem
PreventionAfter one eACD, and aanother attreatment new episodA) High bhigh bre drences. Buhas had inatic reviewthat investACD.26,81 Scally avoiddiverticulutive study ACD. Thereshould be cessation opreventionB) Antibiotthat assessrence of ACa pathophyineffectivebe that a cyrial populapopulationimin. Howecyclic rifaxods of rem10.4% of paalone. Mora higher risBut, furtherecommensupport theC) Probiotirole of procari et al.of Lactoba
post diverticulitis colon stenosis. 88% of patients remainedasymptomatic for a period of 12 months.87 This observa-tional study was the rst that suggested a possible roleof probiotics in this setting. A more recent study evalu-ated combined treatment; balsalazide and VSL#3 (an eight
s pro com
3% ontics ut wSA.
ed thnfor
salaz et aal pNT2)cebotreatral d ontienor toery.
nded of cby rsed ant t risms.ent enigpse erm ( 0.05).52 In summary,seem to be effective in preventing recurrence ofell designed studies are lacking.
Several double-blind and open RCTs havee role of mesalazine in preventing recurrence oftunately most of them have not found a benetine over placebo in preventing recurrence.88---90
l. have recently published two interesting andhase 3 double-blind, placebo RCTs (PREVENT1 and
that also show that mesalazine is not superior in preventing recurrent ACD.91 Also the com-ment, 5-ASA plus rifaximin, has been evaluatedstudies. Trivedi and Das reviewed data from vee open-labelled study, collectively involving overts, and concluded that combination seems to be
rifaximin alone for preventing recurrent ACD.92
Until a few years ago elective surgery was rec- after two attacks of uncomplicated ACD or oneomplicated ACD to reduce morbidity and mor-ecurrence. But elective surgery also carries anrisk of morbi-mortality.93 Because of that, it isto weigh morbidity and mortality due to surgeryk of complicated recurrences and severity of
data show that natural history of ACD is muchn that thought in the past.73,94 The long term riskis more lower than previously believed, and therisks of subsequent emergency surgery (3---7%),) and stoma formation (0---4%) are also quite low.ence of multiple episodes did not increase the riskmplications. In 2009, Pittet et al.95 showed thats with rst ACD were urgent operated compared
in relapsing cases, and that the 30-day mortal- episode was also higher compared to recurrent
vs. 0%). As a matter of fact, the majority ofesenting with complicated ACD lack a history of.96 It is also proposed that recurrent ACD may pro-t perforation, possibly due to adhesion formationinammation.95 Therefore, a policy of electiveer ACD does not decrease the likelihood of fur-y (up to 3%) and does not fully protect against. On the other hand, improved diagnostics andmodalities have reduced the morbi-mortality ofd ACD. Because of these new data, The AmericanColon and Rectum Surgeons in their most recentecommend that elective sigmoid resection afterom ACD should be made on a case-by-case basis14
er that the number of previous episodes is not aator for the selection of candidates to electiveysicians should consider the medical condition
the patient, the frequency and severity of thend the presence of persistent symptoms after thede.14
y difcult to anticipate which cases of ACD will graded severity of rst episode of ACD seems to
-
Please ci ic dGastroen .201
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 10Colonic diverticular disease 7
be a predictor of an adverse natural history. Left side ACD,>5 cm of colon involved and a retroperitoneal abscess werepredictors of recurrence and must be taken into account.97
There is no consensus regarding whether young age (
-
Please ci nic dGastroen .201
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 108 C.J. Gargallo Puyuelo et al.
14. Rafferty J, Shellito P, Hyman NH, Buie W. Recommendationsof the standard committee, ASCRS practice parameters forsigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:939---44.
15. Murphy T, Hunt RH, Fried M. World gastroenterology organiza-tion pr
16. Peery Shaukaassocia2013;1
17. Peery Aet al. Adivertic
18. Wedel UJ, et neuroptroente
19. BassottZambeand gli2005;5
20. Mattii Let al. Ain colopatient
21. BottneJH, Bealtered1753---6
22. SimpsoSpiller systemNeurog
23. AldooriMJ, Cothe ris1995;3
24. TuruneP, KruucompliJ Surg.
25. Strate aspirinfor div2011;1
26. Humesuse andpopula
27. MurphyWGO p
28. West AGastroe
29. Humesment omortalstudy. G
30. LetarteGagn ular disResultsRectum
31. Quigleydiverticdisorde
32. Papi Cease: i(Suppl.
33. Brodribwith a
34. Ornstein MH, Littlewood ER, Baird IM, Fowler J, North WR,Cox AG. Are bre supplements really necessary in diverticulardisease of the colon? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981;282:1629---30.
35. Brodribb AJ, Humphreys DM. Diverticular disease: three stud-s. Par
1976inter
trea72;2umlese. Jarpigic: p05;5mentfaximithoulecc
et aorly icate07;1pi C
symlon. udy Gpi C,eatmmultarmatella, et ated d03;1Inc nato
patie07;2tellalonicl. 200anch
al. Managearmarula ent 10;2ic P, Z
symlon. niba
Lactmptoular 11;5miki
al. Pbel strsi Ad/orn of lon. ursi lsala
maiicate07;2te this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Coloterol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep
actice guidelines: diverticular disease; 2007. p. 1---16.AF, Sandler RS, Ahnen DJ, Galanko JA, Holm AN,t A, et al. Constipation and a low-ber diet are notted with diverticulosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.1:1622---7.F, Barrett PR, Park D, Rogers AJ, Galanko JA, Martin CF,
high-ber diet does not protect against asymptomaticulosis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142, 266.e1---272.e1.T, Busing V, Heinrichs G, Nohroudi K, Bruch HP, Roblickal. Diverticular disease is associated with an entericathy as revealed by morphometric analysis. Neurogas-rol Motil. 2010;22:407---14, e93---e94.i G, Battaglia E, Bellone G, Dughera L, Fisogni S,lli C, et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal, enteric nerves,al cells in colonic diverticular disease. J Clin Pathol.8:973---7., Ippolito C, Segnani C, Battolla B, Colucci R, Dol AN,ltered expression pattern of molecular factors involvednic smooth muscle: an immunohistochemical study ins with diverticular disease. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e57023.r M, Barrenschee M, Hellwig I, Harde J, Egbertscker T, et al. The enteric serotoninergic system is
in impatients with diverticular disease. Gut. 2013;62:2.n J, Sundler F, Humes DJ, Jenkins D, Scholeeld JH,RC. Post inammatory damage to the enteric nervous
in diverticular disease and its relationship to symptoms.astroenterol Motil. 2009;21:847---58.
WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Ascherio A, Stampferlditz GA. Prospective study of physical activity andk of symptomatic diverticular disease in men. Gut.6:276---82.n P, Wikstrm H, Carpelan-Holmstrm M, Kairaluomana O, Scheinin T. Smoking increases the incidence ofcated diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Scand
2010;99:14---7.LL, Liu YL, Huang ES, Giovannucci EL, Chan AT. Use of
or nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs increases riskerticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Gastroenterology.40:1427---33.
DJ, Fleming KM, Spiller RC West J. Concurrent drug the risk of perforated colonic diverticular disease: a
tion-based case---control study. Gut. 2011;60:219---24. T, Hunt RH, Fried M, Krabshuis JH. Diverticular disease.ractice guidelines; 2007.B, Losada M. The pathology of diverticulosis coli. J Clinnterol. 2004;38 (Suppl. 1):S11---6.
DJ, West J. Role of acute diverticulitis in the develop-f complicated colonic diverticular disease and 1-yearity after diagnosis in the UK: population-based cohortut. 2012;61:95---100.
F, Hallet J, Drolet S, Charles Grgoire R, Bouchard A,JP, et al. Laparoscopic emergency surgery for divertic-ease that failed medical treatment: a valuable option?
of a retrospective comparative cohort study. Dis Colon. 2013;56:1395---402.
EMM. Gut microbiota, inammation and symptomaticular disease. New insights into an old and neglectedr. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:127---9., Koch M, Capurso L. Management of diverticular dis-s there room for rifaximin? Chemotherapy. 2005;51
1):110---4.b AJ. Treatment of symptomatic diverticular diseasehigh-bre diet. Lancet. 1977;1:664---6.
ieJ.
36. Pain19
37. Plea
38. Scot20
39. PiRiw
40. CoF,popl20
41. PaoncoSt
42. PatrA Ph
43. LaMca20
44. Droin20
45. Lacoto
46. BietmPh
47. Nam20
48. Frinco
49. Anofsytic20
50. Laetla
51. Tuansioco
52. TBainpl20iverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.5.03.010
t I --- relation to other disorders and bre intake. Br Med;1:424---5.
NS, Almeida AZ, Colebourne KW. Unprocessed brantment of diverticular disease of the colon. Br Med J.:137---40.y PF, Francis B. Dietary management of diverticular dis-
Am Diet Assoc. 1973;63:527---30.nato C, Pelosini I. Rifaximin, a poorly absorbed antibi-harmacology and clinical potential. Chemotherapy.1 (Suppl. 1):36---66.el M, Lembo A, Chey WD, Zakko S, Ringel Y, Yu J, et al.in therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndromet constipation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:22---32.hia A, Vestito A, Pasqui F, Mazzella G, Roda E, Pistoial. Efcacy of long term cyclic administration of theabsorbed antibiotic Rifaximin in symptomatic, uncom-d colonic diverticular disease. World J Gastroenterol.3:264---9., Ciaco A, Koch M, Capurso L. Efcacy of rifaximinptoms of uncomplicated diverticular disease of theA pilot multicentre open trial. Diverticular Diseaseroup. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1992;24:452---6.
Ciaco A, Koch M, Capurso L. Efcacy of rifaximin in theent of symptomatic diverticular disease of the colon.icentre double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Alimentcol Ther. 1995;9:33---9.
G, Pimpo MT, Sottili S, Zippi M, Viscido A, Chiaramontel. Rifaximin improves symptoms of acquired uncompli-iverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis.
8:55---62.R, Pomerri F, Vettorato MG, Dal Pont E, Di Leo V, Fer-A, et al. Interaction between rifaximin and dietary brents with diverticular disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
5:771---9. G. Scarpignato C Rifaximin in the management of
diverticular disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepa-9;3:585---659.
i M, Festa V, Moretti A, Ciaco A, Mangone M, Tornatore V,eta-analysis: long-term therapy with rifaximin in thement of uncomplicated diverticular disease. Alimentcol Ther. 2011;33:902---10.N, Marshall JK. Role of probiotics in manage-
of diverticular disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol.5:1827---30.avoral M. The effect of non-pathogenic Escherichia coliptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of theEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:313---5.le B, Maconi G, Lahner E, De Giorgi F, Cuomo R. Efcacyobacillus paracasei sub. paracasei F19 on abdominalms in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diver-disease: a pilot study. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol.
7:13---22.P, Tsuchiya J, Pathak S, Okura R, Solimene U, Jain S,robiotics in diverticular disease of the colon: an openudy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:31---6., Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM, Elisei W. Mesalazine
Lactobacillus casei in maintaining long-term remis-symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of theHepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:916---20.A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM, Elisei W, Aiello F.zide and/or high-potency probiotic mixture (VSL#3)ntaining remission after attack of acute, uncom-d diverticulitis of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis.2:1103---18.
-
Please ci ic dGastroen .201
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 10Colonic diverticular disease 9
53. Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Elisei W, Picchio M, Forti G, PianeseG, et al. Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine and/or probi-otics in maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicateddiverticular disease --- a double-blind, randomised, placebo-contro
54. Tursi Aand/ortomatiprospeterol. 2
55. Gatta et al. Edisease
56. Kruis WR, Muefalk grcolon -2013;3
57. CompaGM, Iorrecurremonth
58. Gravanrole ofrom u2013;1
59. Doyle GE, et aat max1999;1
60. AldoorUse ofdrugs: ticular
61. Maguirserum of dive
62. Maguirciationadmiss
63. Schoetproblem
64. AndewH. Howposal f
65. Lamrigen J, BdiagnoDis Col
66. Hinchediverti
67. Wasvarpitaliza1999;6
68. ShabanuncomRev. 20
69. Moya Sorianoof outpColopr
70. EtzioniMA. Oupredict
71. AndewWilt Gtreatm2013;3
72. Ambrosetti P, Chautems R, Soravia C, Peiris-Waser N, TerrierF. Long-term outcome of mesocolic and pelvic diverticularabscesses of the left colon: a prospective study of 73 cases.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:787---91.
nda G Comentrute dnes Svertican de, Sch
the more45---5hat A
coloorld Jestwollowi11;98hmilovin Iverticce. Ju KCallaceagnosndei VF,
diagic literris
verticrate rn, aar disbbinnshiplorecllo Aancer dise10;19coni
ent oute d11;54nas Aaximone tudy. Daccarrm tvertic93;15ollmaatorter aoenterente
et antionlot don. Inrsi Aeatm14;31te this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Colonterol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep
lled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:741---51., Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM, Elisei W. Mesalazine
Lactobacillus casei in preventing recurrence of symp-c uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon: active, randomized, open-label study. J Clin Gastroen-006;40:312---6.
L, Vakil N, Vaira D, Pilotto A, Curlo M, Comparato G,fcacy of 5-ASA in the treatment of colonic diverticular. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:113---9., Meier E, Schumacher M, Mickisch O, Greinwaldller R. Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine (Salo-anules) for uncomplicated diverticular disease of the-- a placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.7:680---90.rato G, Fanigliulo L, Cavallaro LG, Aragona G, Cavestroi V, et al. Prevention of complications and symptomaticnces in diverticular disease with mesalazine: a 12-follow-up. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:2934---41.te G, Yahia S. Medical inuences, surgical outcomes:f common medications on the risk of perforationntreated diverticular disease. World J Gastroenterol.9:5947---52., Furey S, Berlin R, Cooper S, Jayawardena S, Ashrafl. Gastrointestinal safety and tolerance of ibuprofenimum over-the-counter dose. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.3:897---906.i WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Wing AL, Willett WC.
acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inammatorya prospective study and the risk of symptomatic diver-
disease in men. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:255---60.e LH, Song M, Strate LE, Giovannucci EL, Chan AT. Higherlevels of vitamin D are associated with a reduced riskrticulitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1631---5.e LH, Song M, Strate LL, Giovannucci EL, Chan AT. Asso-
of geographic and seasonal variation with diverticulitisions. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:74---7.z DJ. Diverticular disease of the colon: a century-old. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:703---9.
eg CS, Knobben L, Hendriks JC, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor to diagnose acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: pro-or a clinical scoring system. Ann Surg. 2011;253:940---6.s W, van Randen A, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Winkelha-ossuyt PM, et al. A clinical decision rule to establish the
sis of acute diverticulitis at the emergency department.on Rectum. 2010;53:896---904.y EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK. Treatment of perforatedcular disease of the colon. Adv Surg. 1978;12:85---109.y H, Turfah F, Kadro O, Beauregard W. Same hos-tion resection for acute diverticulitis. Am Surg.5:632---5.zadeh DM, Wille-Jrgensen P. Antibiotics forplicated diverticulitis. Cochrane Database Syst12;11:CD009092.P, Arroyo A, Prez-Legaz J, Serrano P, Candela F,-Irigaray L, et al. Applicability, safety and efciencyatient treatment in uncomplicated diverticulitis. Techoctol. 2012;16:301---7.
DA, Chiu VY, Cannom RR, Burchette RJ, Haigh PI, Abbastpatient treatment of acute diverticulitis: rates andors of failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:861---5.eg CS, Mulder IM, Felt-Bersma RJ, Verbon A, van derJ, van Goor H, et al. Guidelines of diagnostics andent of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dig Surg.0:278---92.
73. Bionticac
74. Jadi
75. VJHofa 11
76. LaofW
77. Wfo20
78. ScLedien
79. LaWdico
80. SaCTat
81. Modi
82. Stcoul
83. DotioCo
84. ZuFrla20
85. Mamac20
86. Larifalst
87. Gitedi19
88. Sttigaftr
89. PaB,vepitio
90. Tutr20iverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.5.03.010
A, Arezzo A, Serventi A, Bonelli L, Italian Study Groupplicated Diverticulosis (GISDIC), Facchini M, et al. Mul-e observational study of the natural history of left-sidediverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2012;99:276---85., Meagher A, Frizelle FA. Elective surgery after acuteulitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:133---42.
Wall BJM, Reuling EMBP, Consten ECJ, van Grinsvenwartz MP, Broeders IA, et al. Endoscopic evaluationcolon after an episode of diverticulitis: a call for
selective approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:0., Yanai H, Sakhnini E, Menachem Y, Bar-Meir S. Role
noscopy in patients with persistent acute diverticulitis. Gastroenterol. 2008;14:2763---6.od DA, Eglinton TW, Frizelle FA. Routine colonoscopyng acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Br J Surg.:1630---4.vitz-Weiss H, Yalunin E, Boaz M, Sehayek-Shabbat V,
, Chervinski A, et al. Does a colonoscopy after acuteulitis affect its management? A single-center experi-
Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:317---20., Spilsbury K, Farooque Y, Kariyawasam SB, Owen RG,
MH, et al. Is colonoscopy still mandatory after a CTis of left-sided diverticulitis: can colorectal cancer bently excluded? Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1265---70.Velayos F, Neuhaus J, Westphalen AC. Colonoscopy afternosis of diverticulitis to exclude colon cancer: a system-rature review. Radiology. 2012;263:383---90.
AM, Regenbogen SE, Hardiman KM, Hendren S. Sigmoidulitis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:287---97.
LL, Liu YL, Syngal S, Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL. Nut,nd popcorn consumption and the incidence of divertic-ease. JAMA. 2008;300:907---14.s C, Defontgalland D, Duthie G, Wattchow DA. The rela-
of obesity to the complications of diverticular disease.tal Dis. 2006;8:37---40., Hassan C, Maconi G, Manes G, Tammaro G, De
sco V, et al. Cyclic antibiotic therapy for diverticu-ase: a critical reappraisal. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis.:295---302.
G, Barbara G, Bosetti C, Cuomo R, Annibale B. Treat-f diverticular disease of the colon and prevention ofiverticulitis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum.:1326---38., Ponce J, Bignamini A, Mearin F. One year intermittentin plus bre supplementation vs. bre supplementationo prevent diverticulitis recurrence: a proof-of-conceptig Liver Dis. 2013;45:104---9.i S, Tronci S, Falconieri M, Ferrieri A. Long-reatment with rifaximin and lactobacilli in post-ulitic stenoses of the colon. Riv Eur Sci Med Farmacol.:29---34.n N, Magowan S, Shanahan F, Quigley EM, DIVA Inves-
Group. A randomized controlled study of mesalaminecute diverticulitis: results of the DIVA trial. J Clin Gas-rol. 2013;47:621---9.
F, Bargiggia S, Prada A, Bortoli A, Giacosa A, Germanl. Intermittent treatment with mesalazine in the pre-
of diverticulitis recurrence: a randomised multicentreuble-blind placebo-controlled study of 24-month dura-t J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1423---31.. Efcacy, safety, and applicability of outpatientent for diverticulitis. Drug Healthc Patient Saf.:29---36.
-
Please ci nic dGastroen .201
ARTICLE IN PRESS+ModelGASTRO-884; No. of Pages 1010 C.J. Gargallo Puyuelo et al.
91. Raskin JB, Kamm MA, Jamal MM, Mrquez J, Melzer E,Schoen RE, et al. Mesalamine did not prevent recurrentdiverticulitis in phase 3 controlled trials. Gastroenterology.2014;147:793---802.
92. Trivedi CD, Das KM, NDSG. Emerging therapies for diverticulardisease of the colon. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:1145---51.
93. Collins D, Winter DC. Elective resection for diverticu-lar disease: an evidence-based review. World J Surg.2008;32:2429---33.
94. Eglinton T, Nguyen T, Raniga S, Dixon L, Dobbs B, Frizelle FA.Patterns of recurrence in patients with acute diverticulitis. BrJ Surg. 2010;97:952---7.
95. Pittet O, Kotzampassakis N, Schmidt S, Denys A, DemartinesN, Calmes JM. Recurrent left colonic diverticulitis episodes:more severe than the initial diverticulitis? World J Surg.2009;33:547---52.
96. Lorimer JW. Is prophylactic resection valid as an indica-tion for elective surgery in diverticular disease? Can J Surg.1997;40:445---8.
97. Hall JF, Roberts PL, Ricciardi R, Read T, Scheirey C, WaldC, et al. Long-term follow-up after an initial episode of
diverticulitis: what are the predictors of recurrence. Dis ColonRectum. 2011;54:283---8.
98. Klarenbeek BR, Samuels M, van der Wal MA, van der PeetDL, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA. Indications for elective sig-moid resection in diverticular disease. Ann Surg. 2010;251:670---4.
99. Biondo S, Borao JL, Kreisler E, Golda T, Millan M, Frago R, et al.Recurrence and virulence of colonic diverticulitis in immuno-compromised patients. Am J Surg. 2012;204:172---9.
100. Woods RJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Weakley FL.Internal stulas in diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum.1988;31:591---6.
101. McBeath RB, Schiff M Jr, Allen V, Bottaccini MR, Miller JI, EhrethJT. A 12-year experience with enterovesical stulas. Urology.1994;44:661---5.
102. Tamim WZ, Ghellai A, Counihan TC, Swanson RS, Colby JM,Sweeney WB. Experience with endoluminal colonic wall stentsfor the management of large bowel obstruction for benign andmalignant disease. Arch Surg. 2000;135:434---8.
103. Freeman HJ. Segmental colitis associated with diverticulosissyndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6442---3.te this article in press as: Gargallo Puyuelo CJ, et al. Coloterol Hepatol. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohepiverticular disease. Treatment and prevention.5.03.010
Colonic diverticular disease. Treatment and preventionIntroductionPhysiopathology and symptom developmentManagement of diverticular diseaseManagement of uncomplicated diverticular disease (UDD)A) High fiber diet or bulking agentsB) Antibiotic therapyRifaximin
C) ProbioticsD) 5-ASA: mesalazineE) Anticholinergic/antiespasmodic agentsF) Avoid NSAIDs treatmentG) Levels of vitamin D
Treatment of acute colonic diverticulitis (ACD)Treatment of uncomplicated ACD (Hinchey stage 0 or Ia)Treatment of complicated ACD (Hinchey stage Ib to IV)ACD Hinchey Ib or II: abcessACD Hinchey III or IV: purulent or faecal peritonitis
Management following an episode of ACDPrevention of recurrent ACDA) High fiber dietB) AntibioticsC) ProbioticsD) 5-ASAE) Surgery
Treatment of sequelaeA) FistulaB) Obstruction
Management of segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis
ConclusionsAuthors contributionsConflict of interestReferences