collection and publication of precipitation data
DESCRIPTION
Collection and Publication of Precipitation Data. U.S. Geological Survey Tri-Agency Meeting Memphis, TN November 14-15, 2006. by Larry R. Bohman. Why USGS needed a policy…. Our data collection infrastructure is already in place! Uses:. Internal USGS flood operations - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
byby
Larry R. BohmanLarry R. Bohman
22
• Our data collection infrastructure is already in place!• Uses:
Why USGS needed a policy…Why USGS needed a policy…
• Not published before about 1990, but number of published sites has greatly increased and the number of gages displaying data over the Internet had shot through the roof!
– Internal USGS flood operations
– Real time flood warning networks
– Many others?
33
• Water Science Centers had been left to develop their own policies.
USGS Office of Surface Water USGS Office of Surface Water Technical Memorandum 2006.01Technical Memorandum 2006.01
• Result: policy/standards not consistent between WSCs or within a WSC over time
• OSW Technical Memo 2006.01 set in place December 28, 2005
• Sets minimum standards
44
…apply to sites where data is to be collected to NWS standards.
OSW Memo 2006.01 OSW Memo 2006.01 does notdoes not::
…cover other meteorological parameters or snowpack/snow depth measurement.
55
• Normally, daily values in our networks are published and available to anyone.
• Two “classes” of precipitation data:– Permanent – data subject to archival and
retrieval, must be QA/QC’d, and published in the annual data report. Calibration annually within specified criteria. Station analyses required.
– Temporary – data not intended for archival, publication, or later retrieval outside of USGS. Can be displayed for 31 days with a qualifier on the Internet.
Step 1 – Break USGS traditionStep 1 – Break USGS tradition
66
QA/QC• Every WSC that publishes
precipitation data must have a pertinent section in their Surface Water Quality Assurance Plan that details procedures to be used to collect, process, review, and archive the data.
Some internal issues…Some internal issues…
77
Documentation• Station description documents must
be developed and kept current for all sites (temporary or permanent).
• A separate station analysis (apart from streamflow) must be written each year for stations providing permanent data.
• Station visit notes must be kept and archived.
Some internal issues…Some internal issues…
88
Siting
• Avoid proximity to buildings or trees:
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
XX
450
300
X
IDEAL
99
Siting• Avoid windy sites.
Use wind shields only when >20% of annual precip falls in the form of snow.
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
Must consider vandalism…approximately 1% potential error introduced per 10 feet above ground
1010
Siting
• Avoid severely comprising conditions such as roadway splash or drip from vegetation or utility lines (do not publish).
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
1111
• No single type of instrument recommended for all conditions.
• Generally, tipping buckets with heaters are best, but if no AC power, a weighing bucket (spring, strain or wire strain) can be used.
Types of instrumentationTypes of instrumentation
1212
Recording interval
• The recording interval for gages providing permanent data will be 15 minutes or less.
• The interval for temporary gages can be established according to cooperator or WSC objectives.
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
1313
Station descriptions, naming, and numbering conventions
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
• A station description document will be maintained for both temporary and permanent rain gages.
• New rain gages will have separate 15-digit station numbers and names, even if associated with a streamflow gage
1414
Field procedures• 6-8 visits per year• Inspection form noting:
– 45-degree clearance– Funnel/screen conditions, level,
leaks, heater turned on or working and so forth
– Repairs made, tip tests– Calibrations made, if any– Site conditions, etc.
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
1515
Calibration procedures• Annually for permanent and temporary
gages using a 2-inch per hour nozzle (other intensity tests encouraged but not mandated).
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
• Remedial actions taken when:– PERMANENT: Errors exceed 5 percent (tipping bucket),
or 0.1 inch (weighing bucket)– TEMPORARY: Errors exceed 10 percent (tipping bucket),
or 0.2 inch (weighing bucket)
• Documented on a separate form and archived.
1616
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..Estimation of Missing or Erroneous Record
• Long periods with multiple events – Generally, period should be deleted and record classified as missing. If a complete record is needed, a widely accepted method (e.g. reciprocal-distance-squared equation, NWS) can be used.
• Short periods (up to 2 or 3 days) – Volume known but timing is uncertain. Use nearby gages to get daily distribution and mark estimated values with an “e” remark code.
1717
Data CorrectionsDiscouraged – usually insufficient data to
support how and when such corrections should be applied.
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
1818
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..Station Analysis
• A separate analysis narrative must be written each year for permanent data sites. Describes current equipment, problems noted, missing record, calibrations, estimate computations, extremes, comparisons with nearby stations, and any recommendations.
1919
Annual Data Report• Data used in interpretive investigations, distributed
formally to cooperators, or stored in the NWIS database must be quality-assured and published in the WSC’s annual data report.
• Monthly/annual sums only provided when record is complete.
• IDF statistics spanning more than one day are encouraged. Daily value extremes using ADAPS calendar days are discouraged.
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
2020
Annual Data Report (cont.)
• Qualification of records:– Describe site conditions that might assist user in
assessing data accuracy.– No quality ratings based on calibration test
results. An “e” flag is sufficient notice of missing or poor accuracy.
– >10 percent calibration errors (or 0.1-inch) – DO NOT PUBLISH
Other highlights…..Other highlights…..
2121
Internet display – permanent data• Obviously erroneous data should be
screened from public display using ADAPS threshold tools.
Other highlights…Other highlights…
2222
Internet display – permanent data• Threshold criteria
– Incremental precipitation: • Very High – just above max/recording interval (e.g. 3
in./15 min)• Very Low -- -0.01• Do not use rapid increase or decrease thresholds.
– Cumulative precipitation:• Very High and low – Set beyond range of counter• Very Rapid Increase – set to max possible rate in
inches/min., e.g., 0.2 inches/min = 3 inches in 15 minutes
Other highlights…Other highlights…
2323
Internet display – temporary data• Displayed for up to 31 days using same
screening thresholds as permanent data.• Standard disclaimer:
Other highlights…Other highlights…
The X-hour precipitation data for this station are temporary and will only be displayed for 31 days. Time series of X-hour or cumulative daily values will NOT be available for retrieval following the 31-day display period. Although the instrumentation is calibrated at least once/year, the temporary classification means that documented routine inspections and other quality assurance measures are not performed that would make the data acceptable for archival, retrieval, or future use in general scientific or interpretive studies.
2424
Supposed to have been done by end of 2006WY…
Full implementation date??Full implementation date??
2525
QQUUEESSTTIIOONNSS??