collecting and understanding interaction and analytics-based … iis-share.pdf · collecting and...
TRANSCRIPT
Collecting and Understanding Interaction and Analytics-Based Services for Your Customers
Amerigo De Vera, Customer Interaction Analytics Director, TSYS
the people of TSYS improve lives and businesses across the world with every payment transaction.
41 million times each day
$278 million
800,000
More than 3,000
$660 million
200+
1.2 million
40 million
30 million
5 1/2 years
Managed Services Facts & Figures
Total merchants supported
Seats in global contact centers
Total POS terminals supported
TSYS Managed Services clients
2012 client fraud loss savings
Amount processed through disputes/chargebacks
Total unique cardholders served
Total calls handled per year
Average length of client contract
Workforce
Analytics
Feedback
Performance
Agenda
Voice of the Customer
Case Studies
What is TSYS Voice of the Customer?
* Source: B. Temkin; Are you Listening to the Voice of the Customer, July 2007
Voice of the Customer “A systematic approach for incorporating the needs of customers into the design of customer experiences” *
Uses Systematic Approach
Uncovers Customer Need Gaps
Implements Experience Design
The Value
• After-call surveys
• CSAT trends
• Improved first-call resolution
• Identified customer dissatisfaction
• Business intelligence
• Measured campaign effectiveness
• Determined cause of customer defections
• Customers moved to greater self-service
TSYS Voice of the CustomerSM
A collection of insights and analysis to better understand customer needs and behaviors
Phone
Phone Survey
Social Media
Chat
Web
Intent Insight
Root Cause Analysis
0 25 75 100 Agent response
Service
Wait during call
Product
Categorization
20
40
60
80
Alert
Speech Analytics Emotion Detection Talk Over Analysis Call Flow Analysis Desktop Analytics
misinformed
second time I’m calling
that’s great
frustrating
Interaction Analytics
Impact
Real Time Impact
Capture
Analyze and Categorize Interactions To Reveal Satisfaction Insights
Workforce Driven
020406080
12:0
…1:
00…
2:00
…3:
00…
4:00
…5:
00…
6:00
…7:
00…
8:00
…9:
00…
10:0
…11
:0…
12:0
…1:
00…
2:00
…3:
00…
4:00
…5:
00…
6:00
…7:
00…
8:00
…9:
00…
10:0
…11
:0…
Consumer CRV Forecast vs. Received
ForecastReceived
• Analytics engine scans all “Transfer” calls
• Eliminates manually listening to every call for 7 days
• Over 10,000 minutes of call volume are used
• Methods have been validated over the years
Analytics System Efficiency
• Users see words and phrases on a recorded call • Don’t have to analyze full 10-minute call • Analysts can skip directly to a word or phrase • Number of hours spent reviewing root cause issues is reduced
Workforce Driven
• Completed 10,000 minute call sample analysis of Transfers • Upon observation, several issues were identified • The AHT for all calls is 9:56
• Warm transfers are the biggest issue
• Risk Agents remain on the phone too long
• Agent verification is taking too long
• One transaction on an account 20 times
• Agents having system issues
Call Observations
• Change policy/procedure
• Share information with the client
• Offer to handle overflow calls
• “Transfer in” calls immediately
• Conduct further analysis
Suggestive Actions
Workforce Driven
Transaction Dispute 27%
Warm Transfer 21%
Transfer In 15%
Merchant Error 9%
B/T 6%
System Issue 6%
Card Fee 4%
Dispute Inquiry 4%
Auth User Removal Policy 2%
Agent Error 2%
Repeat Caller 2% Transaction Policy
2%
0% 0%
Call Reasons
Customer Service
58% Merchant 25%
Internal 17%
Warm Transfer to
Analytics Categories
• Organizational lexicons listed above are most widely used
• All words/phrases in every lexicon category are customizable
Analytics Customer Effort
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Cou
nt
December November October
Call Type % of Category AHT Payment 40% 10:03 Website 18% 11:07 Transaction 13% 9:33 AHT for the Top 3 Call Types: 10:15
Below are the three top call types identified while trending customer effort for one month:
Analytics Customer Effort Hold and Transfers
October
Average Hold Time 238 Olympic Average Hold Time 231 Number of Calls with Hold Time
82
November
Average Hold Time 266 Olympic Average Hold Time 252
Number of Calls with Hold Time
47
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
December
Average Hold Time 232 Olympic Average Hold Time 227
Number of Calls with Hold Time
54
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800Overall
Average Hold Time 243 Olympic Average Hold Time 240
Number of Calls with Hold Time
183
180 200 220 240 260 280
October
November
December
Analytics Customer Effort - Voice of the Customer
• “You're the third person I talked to today and I verified my checking account number with the first two ladies and neither one of them caught that.” (Auto pay)
• “I tried to make my payment on the Internet but the website is having problems and won't pop up.” • “I just tried to make a payment through your telephone system and I don't know if it was accepted or not.”
• “When I view statements I get a blank screen. This is the only company I can't view statements from, if it was something with my computer it would be the same with all companies when I get e-statements with them.”
• “Every time when I want to go online to pay it won't let me pay.” • “I just registered online and it won't let me log in.”
• "Is my card working now?, 'cause I‘ve tired of calling every month.” • “I'm being charged an additional 17% on a fee when the fee is a purchase; I mean the fee is a
transfer transaction not a purchase.” (Balance Transfer Fee)
Payment
Website
Transaction
Analytics Customer Effort
Reason Agent Training Procedure/ Process Policy Coaching
Autopay Website – Payment IVR Payment-Debit Card Payment Information – 3rd Party Website – Statement Registration Decline Transaction Balance Transfer Fee Travel Notations Signature Card Rewards Redemption
Feedback Survey
NOTE: The Call Center Average Score calculation is based off all combined survey scores
88.5%
14%
55.0%
86.6%
11%
52.1%
87.3%
11%
56.3%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Call Center Average Score Call Center Response Rate Overall Estimated NPS
December November October
Feedback Survey Average Score/Rating per Question
100-90% = Superior 80-89% = Excellent 70-79% = Fair
91%
87% 86%
90%
88%
85% 84%
89% 88%
87%
85%
89%
80%
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
CustomerSatisfaction
CustomerRecommendation
Customer Effort First CallResolution
December November October
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.6
4.5
4.4 4.4
4.6
4.5 4.5
4.4
4.6
4
4.25
4.5
4.75
CustomerSatisfaction
CustomerRecommendation
Customer Effort First CallResolution
December November October
Average Score per Question Average Rating per Question
The Loyalty index comprises 3 questions: 1. Customer Satisfaction: Received an overall score of 91% 2. Customer Recommendation: Received an overall score of 87% 3. Customer Effort: Received an overall score of 86% Client received an overall combined Loyalty Score of : 88%
Customer Satisfaction and Customer Recommendation increased by 1, while Customer Effort and First Call Resolution stayed the same for the past three months.
The average median for all survey questions remain above 4.0.
Feedback Survey - First Call Resolution
91.0% Of feedback received on the day of their call, customers responded they will most likely NOT have to call back regarding the same issue. 91.0% is the combined score of Rating 5 & 4. November was 90.0% and October was 90.8%
76.0% Of feedback received on the day of their call, customers responded they will NOT have to call back regarding the same issue. 76.0% was from Rating 5 only. November was 77.7% and October was 76.5%
9.0% Of feedback received on the day of their call, customers responded they will most likely have to call back regarding the same issue. 9.0% was from Rating 3-1 combined. November was 10.0% and October was 9.2%
76% 77.7% 76.5%
15% 12.3% 14.3%
4% 4.1% 3.1% 2% 1.4% 1.7% 3% 4.5% 4.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
December November October
Rating 5: Extremely LikelyRating 4: Very LikelyRating 3: Moderately LikelyRating 2: Somewhat LikelyRating 1: Not at all Likely
Feedback Survey - Agent Performance
64%
17% 8% 12%
62%
17% 9%
13%
64%
17%
6% 13%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
90% and higher 80%-89% 70%-79% Below 70%
December November October
Overall Agent Performance Summary: • 66% scored 90 or higher, which is considered superior • 17% scored between 80 and 89, which is considered excellent • 8% scored between 70 and 79, which is considered fair • 12% scored below 70
Customer Service Agent Scoring
Feedback Survey Next Steps
Actions Taken
• Low agent performance scores coached
• Call-backs on warranted calls
• Recognize agents with top scores
• Recognize agents with most surveys
Analytics Case Study
©2013 Total System Services Inc ® Proprietary All rights reserved worldwide 22
Decrease Repeat Callers 7% average reduction in call volumes from previous year!
$317k Estimated Annual Savings!
Increase Customer E-Statement Adoption
22% increase in Credit Care payment and e-statement users for fiscal year!
$250K Estimated Annual Savings!
Customized Customer Interaction Footprint Improvement
Increase Self Service
Increase Website Usage Decrease Repeat Callers
Increase IVR Payments 11% increase in IVR payments
compared to same time previous year!
$375k Estimated Annual Savings!
Success is Measured by the Results!
Satisfaction Survey Case Study
©2013 Total System Services, Inc.® Proprietary. All rights reserved worldwide. 23
Creating A Net Promoter Score Foundation •Average financial sector Net Promoter Score 29% •Achieved score 20% above industry average
Credit Card Loyalty NPS of 49% Achieved!
Data Mining: The Value of the Customer Voice
Voice of the Customer (VoC) Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Understanding the Voice of the Customer
• 46% voiced superior service
• 12% response rate
88% Average Score For All Surveys!
Success is Measured by the Results!
Interaction Analytics / Social Media
• Capture/understand data
• Speech analytics
• Real-time customer surveys
• Customer base intelligence
• Improve operational effectiveness
• Increase customer loyalty
• Capture Voice of the Customer
• Net Promoter Score
Thank You! Questions?