colin scoble senior protection engineer - uk power networks

35
13/03/2020 1 Colin Scoble Senior Protection Engineer Centralised Protection & Control

Upload: others

Post on 19-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2017. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved113/03/2020 1

Colin ScobleSenior Protection Engineer

Centralised Protection & Control

2

Why do we need a Centralised Protection and control system Architecture?

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

How will we test and maintain our new Centralised Protection and Control systems?

Agenda

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

3

UK Power Networks metrics

Why do we need a Centralised Protection and control system Architecture?

Measure DataEnd customers 8.3MPeak demand 16GWEnergy distributed 85TWhUnderground electricity cables 138,000kmOverhead lines 46,000kmProtection relays 45,000ED1 totex allowance £6,029M

4

Growth inElectric Vehicles

• Over 300 electric buses in London by 2020

• 195,000 Plug-in vehicles sold in the UK, 31% on our networks

• UK EV registrations 53% year on year growth

• Over 19,000 public Charge points

Storage Market

• Over 1GW of accepted storage offers

• 1000 (18GW) formal enquiries since July 2015

• Two 50MW Batteries connected,

Growth in DG

• 9.1GW of DG connected, doubled in the last 5 years

• First Solar / Storage schemes with no subsidy support

• Over 200,000 distributed energy resources

Pace and scale of change continues to increase

Why do we need a Centralised Protection and control system Architecture?

5

No longer the “New World” this is our network

Why do we need a Centralised Protection and control system Architecture?

6

Protection development timeline

ELECTROMECH STATIC NUMERICAL CENTRALISED

Why do we need a Centralised Protection and control system Architecture?

7

Why do we need a Centralised Protection and control system Architecture?

With the changes in our network we have a much greater need for data rich substations to support smart grid technologies and Asset management

We need a technology that can be deployed rapidly in strategic locations to support our DSO strategy

The technology required needs to achieve greater TOTEX cost efficiency than current technologies

8

International Standards

ENA Standards

UKPN Standards

How we started the journey

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

9

Hardware Assessment

Environmental Assessment of hardware completed against ENA TS 48-5 and registered hardware version and firmware type

1.BS EN 60068-1, 2….2.BS EN 60255-21,26….3.BS EN 605294.BS EN 60834 e.t.c

Functional Assessment

Functional Assessment completed against relevant ENA TS 48-6 specification.

BS EN 60255-….

UKPN Type approval

Complete Assessment against specific application requirements e.g. 11kV Auto-Reclosing FeederProduce Standard data for approval such as standard application diagrams, settings, configurations, SCL Files

Identify Training

Identify training modules to brief Engineering staff on the new hardware and functional elements of the architecture

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Assessment process

10

Power Supply Version

Processor Version

Binary Input Card Version

Output Card Version

Communication card Version

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

Hardware Assessment

HARDWARE PLATFORM

11

ENA TS 48-6-2 Network Model

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

Functional Assessment

Functional Test Type

Operating characteristic accuracy Threshold test

Operating characteristic time Threshold test

Fault indications Event capture

Event recording Event capture

Settings transfer during fault Data stability

12

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

ENA TS 48-6-2 Network Model

Total of 107 fault cases

Functional Assessment

Test Type

1Ph-E Dynamic test

2Ph Dynamic test

2Ph-E Dynamic test

3Ph Dynamic test

Switch onto fault Dynamic test

Evolving faults Dynamic test

13

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

Functional Assessment

14

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

Functional Assessment

15

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

Advantages

Compliance with standards specified can be verified and compared with vendor reports submitted for Assessment Consistent Assessment method across different vendor assets on the networkCyber security patches can be verified through regression testing very quickly in a lab environment closing vulnerabilities quickly and efficientlyIEC 61850 data attributes from logical nodes can be confirmed during Assessment phaseNetwork model can be easily modified for project specific queries or investigations New functions or upgrades can be assessed before being deployed on the live network

Functional Assessment

IEC61850-9-2 SMVIEC61850-7-4 DA

16

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

SSD• SYSTEM

SPECIFICATION DESCRIPTION

ICD• IED CAPABILITY

DESCRIPTION

IID• INSTATIATED IED

DESCRIPTION

CID• CONFIGURED

IED DESCRIPTION

SCL

UKPN Type approval

IEC61850 ENGINEERING

IEC61850 SYSTEM BASED TESTING

IEC 61850 IED/STATION

ANALYSIS

UKPN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL

SPECIFICATIONS

UKPN TYPE APPROVAL

TOOLS

17

SPECIFIED INLINE WITH IEC61850-7-4:2010 EDITION 2

ANSI AND IEC STANDARDS FOR FLEXIBILITY

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval (SSD)

18

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval (SSD)

PLDF-PDIF

87L

*

DIFFERENTIAL LINE PROTECTION

STATUS INFORMATION

MEASURED AND METERED VALUES

Str (ACD)

Op (ACT)

DifAClc (WYE)RstA (WYE)

TmAst (CSD)

CONTROLSOpCntRs (INC)

SETTINGS

LinCapac (ASG)

LoSet (ASG)

MinOpTmms (ING)MaxOpTmms (ING)

HiSet (ASG)

RstMod (ENG)RsDITmms (ING)TmACrv (CURVE)

TmAChr33 (CSG)

IEC61850-7-4 SPEC

PLDF-PDIF

87L

*

DIFFERENTIAL LINE PROTECTION

STATUS INFORMATION

MEASURED AND METERED VALUES

Str (ACD)

Op (ACT)

DifAClc (WYE)RstA (WYE)

TmAst (CSD)

CONTROLSOpCntRs (INC)

SETTINGS

LinCapac (ASG)

LoSet (ASG)

MinOpTmms (ING)MaxOpTmms (ING)

HiSet (ASG)

RstMod (ENG)RsDITmms (ING)TmACrv (CURVE)

TmAChr33 (CSG)

UKPN SPEC

STATUS

MANDATORY

COLOUR KEY

OPTIONAL

CONDITIONAL

COLOUR

19

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval (SSD)

20

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval (SSD)

21

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval (SSD)

22

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval

23

UPDATE UKPN STANDARD LIBRARY

PUBLISH ENGINEERING APPROVAL

ARCHIVE Assessment REPORTS

Our approach to Assess, specify and design a Centralised Protection and Control system?

UKPN Type approval

24

ONLY MAINTAIN WHEN SYSTEM TELLS YOU CYBER SECURITY PATCH UPGRADES

How will we test and maintain our new Centralised Protection and Control systems?

25

SYSTEM TEST MODEL INJECTED QUANTITIES NETWORK PARAMETERS

How will we test and maintain our new Centralised Protection and Control systems?

26

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

GENERAL ARRANGEMENTDESIGN

CENTRALISED PROTECTION CUBICLE

RETROFIT SWITCHGEAR

27

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

SPENS G1B132/11(6.6)kV INCOMER

SPENS 1311(6.6)kV AUTO-

RECLOSING FEEDER

SPENS 1111(6.6)kV

INTERCONNECTOR FEEDER

SPENS 0911(6.6)kV NON-AUTO-RECLOSING FEEDER

SPENS 0711(6.6)kV AUTO-

RECLOSING FEEDER

SPENS 1211(6.6)kV AUTO-

RECLOSING FEEDER

SPENS 1011(6.6)kV NON-AUTO-RECLOSING FEEDER

SPENS 0811(6.6)kV

INTERCONNECTOR FEEDER

SPENS 0611(6.6)kV NON-AUTO-RECLOSING FEEDER

SSC600Main

UKPN Control Centre

HMI

DNP3

REF615

COM 600

SSC600Back Up

SPENS 0511(6.6)kV

INTERCONNECTOR FEEDER

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

REF615

SPENS G2B132/11(6.6)kV INCOMER

GEMU320

GEMU320

11kV Bus Section

SPENS 61REF615

28

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

HMI

SSC 600 CENTRALISED PROTECTION BACKUP

SSC 600 CENTRALISED PROTECTION MAIN

COM600 PROTOCOL GATEWAYSTATION GUARD STATION SCOUTMEINBERG M1000 GPS

TIMESYNCH

GPS RECEIVER

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 05172.24.5.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 07172.24.7.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 09172.24.9.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 11172.24.11.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 13172.24.13.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 06172.24.6.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 08172.24.8.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 10172.24.10.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 12172.24.12.29

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 61172.24.61.29

GE MU320 MERGING UNIT IED

SPENS 51172.24.51.26

GE RPV 311 DISTURBANCE/EVENT RECORDER

DANEO NETWORK ANALYZER

172.24.238.1

172.24.233.5 172.24.233.6

172.24.238.9NOTE 1 *

172.24.238.23

172.24.233.4

172.24.238.22172.24.238.7

SECONDARY INJECTION TEST SET

172.24.238.21

AFS677 MANAGED SWITCH MAIN

172.24.253.1

AFS677 MANAGED SWITCH BACKUP

172.24.254.1

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 51172.24.51.29

GE MU320 MERGING UNIT IED

SPENS 52172.24.52.26

REF 615 FEEDER MANAGEMENT IED

SPENS 52172.24.52.29

29

GT1LVPROTNPANEL

GT2LVPROTNPANEL

GT1/GT2AVC

PANEL

RTUPANEL

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

48V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

FDR1PROTNPANEL

GT1HVPROTNPANEL

FDR3PROTNPANEL

BUS SECTIONPROTNPANEL

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

48V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

132kV RELAY ROOM

11kV RELAY ROOM

GT2 HVPROTNPANEL

FDR2PROTNPANEL

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

30

GT1LVPROTNPANEL

GT2LVPROTNPANEL

GT1/GT2AVC

PANEL

RTUPANEL

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

48V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

FDR1PROTNPANEL

GT1HVPROTNPANEL

FDR3PROTNPANEL

BUS SECTIONPROTNPANEL

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

48V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

132kV RELAY ROOM

11kV RELAY ROOM

GT2 HVPROTNPANEL

FDR2PROTNPANEL

CENTRALPROTN/

CONTROL

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

31

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

132kV RELAY ROOM

11kV RELAY ROOM

CENTRALPROTN/

CONTROL

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

32

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

110V DCBATTERYSYSTEM

132kV RELAY ROOM

CENTRALPROTN/

CONTROL

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

33

The Centralised Protection and Control system and its benefits

NIA PROJECT - UNIFIED PROTECTION PROJECT

[email protected]

34

ConclusionsA new strategy on how we Assess a centralised protection and control system was required. This included an opportunity to align our specifications to the latest standards and communicate clearly to vendors

We identified opportunities to drastically reduce our substation footprint and reduce Engineering, Commissioning and maintenance time providing TOTEX cost efficiency benefits

Greater opportunities to complete full system testing prior to circuit transfers which reduces network risk and outage durations

Look to obtain additional funding in RIIO-ED2 (2023-2031) period to accelerate deployment of these systems

3513/03/2020 35

Thank youQuestions?