coil concept and design for ncsx
DESCRIPTION
Coil Concept and Design for NCSX. S. P. Hirshman, June 3, 1999 on behalf of the NCSX coil team. NCSX Coil Team Members. Art Brooks, Don Monticello and Neil Pomphrey Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Coil cutting, plasma reconstruction (VMEC, PIES), Flexibility (Curopt) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Coil Concept and Design for NCSX
S. P. Hirshman, June 3, 1999
on behalf of the NCSX coil team
NCSX Coil Team Members
• Art Brooks, Don Monticello and Neil Pomphrey– Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory– Coil cutting, plasma reconstruction (VMEC, PIES), Flexibility (Curopt)
• William (“Buff”) Miner, Jr. and Prashant Valanju– Fusion Research Center– The University of Texas at Austin– SVD current optimization, GA coil cutting
• Steve Hirshman– Oak Ridge National Laboratory– Logistical support
Coil Design Activity for NCSX
• Identification of critical design goals– Physics, engineering constraints
• Development of computation tools– Advanced algorithms (Gen.Alg., CurOpt)
• Application to c82 preliminary design– status of target criteria and coil topology
• Flexibility and start-up considerations
C82 Coil Reference Design: Critical Goals
• Physics– Maintain QA-ness (NC transport) and kink
stability at < = 4% for reconstructed surfaces
• Engineering (maintain reconstructability)– limit jmax < 15 kA/cm2 at |B| = 1.2T (RBT = 1.65)
– reduce number of coils (cost)– maximize coil-to-coil separation (machining)
c82 Coil Design Process
PlasmaBoundary
NESCOIL
SVD Scan: Min (jmax)
Plasma-Coil Sep.(18 cm.)
Choose Candidate Coil Contours
Genetic Algorithm: Select Optimum Subset of Coils
Engineering Constraints jmax, coil-coil separtion
Reconstruction
“Fine Tuning”
Coil Designers MUST Serve Two Masters
PHYSICS ENGINEERING
Progress Toward Candidate NCSX Coils
• At Previous PAC– current sheet solutions - looked promising– discrete coils reconstructed for an impractically
large number (> 30) per period– current density acceptable for c10– plasma-coil minimum separation was NOT
uniformly maintained by winding surface
NCSX Candidate Coils (cont’d)
• Present Status:– finite coil designs (< 30 per period) for c82
• Designs exist with 16 - 20 coils (per period)
• “Good” reconstruction of flux surfaces
• jmax < 15 kA/cm2 (< 12 in some cases -> improved flat top, high |B|)
– winding surface - plasma distance (18 cm) – improved kink-stability in reconstructions
Emergence of c82 Candidate Coil Designs
(all designs: <a> = 42 cm, 18 cm. plasma-coil separation, B = 1.2 T)
C82 Case Description Coils Per Jmax Berr -% Surface Deviation Kink Eigenvalue QA-ness measureID Period (kA/cm**2) (ave., max) cm (av., max) (/Target value) (chi-sq/chi-sqTarget)
RECONSTRUCTION INFO --> 121 Equal Current 26 14.7 .95, 7.0 .47, 2.1 9 1.5 (s=.5), 1.0 (s=.8)
A. Brooks: Hand Tuning
4064 Lo-Jmax 20 11.9 1.2, 6.3 3.3, 8.9 (--------)EF-10% adjusted VF 1.0, 3.8 5 2.0 (s=.5), 1.3 (s=.8)
4321 Target Jmax 20 15.8 .95, 5.0 .73, 2.6 6 1.5 (s=.5), 1.1 (s=.8)
Latest GA Lo-# coils 16 14.4 1.1, 4.8"Miner" Miracle (further reduction anticipated)
C82 26-coil/period Design
Coil Cutting Developments
• Rapid Singular Value Decomposition– (SVD) scanning for Valanju minima of jmax
• eliminate small eigenvalues resulting from Least Squares fit of B-field
• NESCOIL current sheet: basis for discrete coils
• Reconstruction recovery of kink stability– the Pomphrey tweak
• Genetic Algorithm– application to cutting discrete coils
Jmax reduction comparison c82 vs. c93
c82.f88 svd scan (Berr target)Best at 121: Berr=0.6%, Jmax=.83
0.8316
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
100 110 120 130 140
number of svd weights kept out of 144
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2<Berr>
jMax
c93.f1010 svd scan (Berr target)Best at 196: Berr=0.22%, Jmax=.81
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
180 190 200 210 220
number of svd weights kept out of 220
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2<Berr>
jMax
Reconstruction with c82 Coils
• Geometric reconstruction– NESCOIL -> coils -> VMEC (free-bdy) ->
surfaces: assess displacement from target
• Physics reconstruction– Calculate of kink stability, QA-ness
• PIES reconstruction (in progress)– Existence of 3D flux surfaces
• basis for stability/transport calculations
Geometric Reconstruction
• c82 case 121 (26 coils/period)– started from lowest Valanju minimum
• SVD weights retained = 121
– very low displacement error– reconstruction: looks “good” to the eye
– jmax (14.7 kA/cm2) even lower than target requirement
Physics Reconstruction for c82 (121/26 coils)
• Quasi-Axisymmetry is well-maintained
• Kink is initially unstable
• Restoration of Kink Stability– An example of synergy between the physics
and the coil groups– the Pomphrey tweak
Restoration of Kink Stability (cont’d)
• Physics identified significance of matching indentation and “wings” at v=– Outboard pusher/puller coils were modestly re-
energized (by 10%) to recover kink stability– Application suggests a viable experimental
knob for “tweaking” the plasma configuration
Genetic Algorithm: Cutting Discrete Coils for c82
• GA: an efficient way to find an optimized subset of coils– pick Ncoil coils out of Ncontour contours (obtained
from NESCOIL, where Ncoil << Ncontour)
– contour selection based on minimizing physics and engineering criteria:
• Berror, Jmax, minimum coil-to-coil separation
– rapid 2D analysis tool (cf. 3D ONSET)
C82 Coil Cutting: A Slide Show
• The following slide show demonstrates the GA application for coil-cutting– first, locate Berror minimum (may be global)
– vary weights on Jmax
– obtain optimized low and moderate current states
• This “chromosome quartet” is composed in B. Miner...
Genetic Algorithm for Coil SelectionDiscrete Potential Contour Evolution
Initial conditions:
Current sheet Berror = .2%
98 coils generated from 60 contour levels.
GA selects the “optimal” 20 coils per period which yield a joint minimum in Berror and Jmax.
Toroidal angle / (2)
Poloidal angle / (2)
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection (initial zero weighting on Jmax)
Generation = 0001
Berror = .0090
Jmax = (coils too close to estimate…)
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection (lowest Berror state with coils)
Generation = 0236
Berror = .0041
Jmax =
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection (weight on Jmax turned on)
Generation = 1003
Berror = .0120
Jmax = est.
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 1025
Berror = .0079
Jmax = est.
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 1127
Berror = .0122
Jmax = 18.69
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 1105
Berror = .0119
Jmax = 18.37
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 1318
Berror = .0095
Jmax = 20.68
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 2795
Berror = .0090
Jmax = 20.47
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection (first big decrease in Jmax)
Generation = 3043
Berror = .0120
Jmax = 11.78
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 4001
Berror = .0123
Jmax = 11.86
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection
Generation = 4064
Berror = .0123
Jmax = 11.85
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection(decreased weighting of Jmax)
Generation = 4074
Berror = .0095
Jmax = 15.78
Genetic Algorithm for Coil Selection (final moderate jmax state)
Generation = 4321
Berror = .0094
Jmax = 15.75
Reconstruction for Low jmax c82(EF-10, VF correction):
kink restabilization likely
NCSX Start-up:Coil Issues
• Three “distinct” plasma states that coils must be capable of supporting– Vacuum start-up
• zero current, zero beta
– Start of flattop • full current, low beta
– End of flattop• full current, full beta: reference design point
NCSX Flexibility:Coil Issues
• Coils must have flexibility to produce– good vacuum surfaces
• in spite of low iota, resonances => stochasticity
– good surfaces at reference state• kink, QA-ness assessed assuming good surfaces
– kink stability and confinement for a range of profiles (pressure, current) around the reference state
Tools for Start-up Assessment• In Vacuum
– Cary-Hanson code (resonance suppression)
– AVAC
• In Vacuum or Finite Beta– Couple Curopt code (Brooks and Pomphrey) to output
from PIES - get internal (plasma) |B|mn spectrum, not just on surface - and target specific resonances for suppression
• Determine whether c82 coils have the re-quired flexibility to restore plasma volume
Vacuum Field Line Plots from fixed boundary
Vacuum Field Line Plots from d18.3.121.16 coil set with re-optimized currents
Tools for Robustness (flexibility) Assessment of c82
• Curopt code– couple with physics group to analyze stability,
QA-ness of neighboring states as pressure, current profiles vary
– compute currents in fixed c82 coils that most nearly generate these desired states
– repeat standard reconstruction analysis• Free boundary VMEC analysis (Mike Z.)
Future Tasks for Coil Group
• Finish c82 low J, low coil number calculations
• Look at c93: even lower J possible => greater experimental flexibility
• Work with physics, experimental teams to formulate flexibility, start-up implications for coils
Coil Designers SUCCESSFULLY Serve Two
Masters
PHYSICS ENGINEERING