code of procedures for ultrasonic testing of … of procedures for ultrasonic...axle...

78
CODE OF PROCEDURES FOR ULTRASONIC TESTING OF AXLES AND WHEEL OF LARGE TRACK MACHINES

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • CODE OF PROCEDURES FOR ULTRASONIC TESTING

    OF

    AXLES AND WHEEL OF LARGE TRACK MACHINES

  • REFERENCES

    S.NO. MACHINE MODEL

    POSITION OF AXLE

    REPORT/DRAWING REFERRED

    RDSO LETTER NO.

    DATE OF ISSUE

    1. Unimat 08-275

    Axle UD62.4901 SP 1668/1676

    TM/HM/7

    15/22.01.2008

    2. UNIMAT 08-275-3S, DGS-62N, 09-3X and UNIMAT COMPACT M

    Axle WN02-120.184.1SP 1668/1676

    TM/HM/7

    15/22.01.2008

    3. RM80, FRM 80 and RM 76

    Axle 64.02.2249 TM/HM/7

    15/22.01.2008

    4. CSM (09-32) and DUOMATIC (08-32)

    Driving axle UD 62.3301 SP 1668/1676

    TM/HM/7

    15/22.01.2008

    5. Track Machine Wheels

    --- RDSO report no.IRS R-34-2003

    TM/HM/7 Vol.III

    02/06.6.2006

    6. UTV90TT (Phooltas)

    Powered axle

    M/s. Phooltas. TM/HM/7 Vol.III

    26/28.02.2007

    7. CSM (09-32)

    Satellite or Driving Bogie axle

    CPOH Drg. No. C-1411 CSM

    TM/HM/7

    07.2.2003

    8. DUOMATIC

    Driving axle IRTMTC Drg. No. D-1402 DUO-R1

    TM/HM/7

    07.2.2003

    9. UNIMAT

    Front driving axle

    CPOH Drg. No. UNI-1402

    TM/HM/7

    07.2.2003

    10. UNIMAT

    Rear driving axle

    CPOH Drg. No. UNI-1401

    TM/HM/7

    07.2.2003

    11. CSM (09-32)

    Running axle

    IRTMTC Drg. No. C-1406 CSM

    TM/HM/7

    07.2.2003

  • CONTENT

    S.NO. MACHINE MODEL POSITION OF AXLE PAGE NO.

    1. Unimat 08-275

    Axle 1-10

    2. UNIMAT 08-275-3S, DGS-62N, 09-3X and UNIMAT COMPACT M

    Axle 11-20

    3. RM80, FRM 80 and RM 76

    Axle 21-30

    4. CSM (09-32) and DUOMATIC (08-32)

    Driving axle 31-39

    5. Track Machine Wheels

    --- 40-46

    6. UTV90TT (Phooltas)

    Powered axle 47-61

    7. CSM (09-32)

    Satellite or Driving Bogie axle

    62-75

    8. DUOMATIC

    Driving axle 62-75

    9. UNIMAT

    Front driving axle 62-75

    10. UNIMAT

    Rear driving axle 62-75

    11. CSM (09-32)

    Running axle 62-75

  • Page 1 of 75

    CODE OF PROCEDURE OF ULTRASONIC TESTING OF TRACK

    MACHINE UD62.4901 SP. 1668/1676 AXLE FOR 08-275 OF M/s PLASSER

    INDIA Pvt. Ltd. IN SERVICE (TENTATIVE).

    1. SCOPE : To ensure safety and reliability of rolling stocks, axles are

    required to be examined periodically for presence of cracks. This

    code stipulates the testing procedure, calibration method and

    sensitivity setting for detection of cracks in Track Machine

    UD62.4901 SP. 1668/1676 Axle for 08-275 of M/s Plasser India Pvt.

    Ltd. in service.

    2. NORMATED REFERENCES: The following RDSO / IS standards contain

    provisions, which through reference in this text constitute provisions of

    this code of procedure. At the time of publication, the editions

    indicated were valid.

    Specification No. Title

    RDSO specification No.

    M&C/NDT/104/2000

    (Rev.1) April 2005

    or

    Technical specification for battery cum-

    mains operated ultrasonic flaw detector

    having memory calibration and 100 mm X

    80 mm screen.

    RDSO specification

    No.M&C/NDT/125/2004

    Portable digital ultrasonic flaw detector with

    A-scan storage.

    RDSO specification No.

    WD-17-MISC-92

    Soft grease

    IS:1628-1986

    Reaffirmed in Feb.1996

    Axle oil

    IS: 1875-1992 Carbon steel billets, blooms, slabs and bars

    for forging.

    IS:12666-1988

    Reaffirmed in 1993

    Methods for performance assessment of

    ultrasonic flaw detection equipment.

  • Page 2 of 75

    3. PROCEDURE OF EXAMINATION:

    3.1 Equipment and accessories to be employed:

    3.1.1 Equipment: Ultrasonic flaw detector approved by RDSO, Lucknow to

    RDSO specification No.M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April 2005 or

    No. M&C/NDT/125/2004 or any other ultrasonic flaw detector

    meeting RDSO specification No. M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April

    2005 or No. M&C/NDT/125/2004.

    3.1.2 Accessories : Far end scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics.

    Near end low angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 15/20 mm

    dia., Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with

    perspex wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 17.5o angle or

    angle probe of 17.50 .

    High angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with perspex

    wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 37 o

    angle or angle

    probe of 370 having dia. of curvature 140 +

    200 mm .

    3.1.3 Couplant: Soft grease or axle oil (medium) to RDSO specification No. WD-

    17- MISC-92 or IS :1628 (86) Reaffirmed in Feb. 96 .

    3.1.4 Standard bar : 50mm dia. x 500 mm long and 50mm dia. X 182 mm long

    steel bar to designation 45C8 of IS:1875 –1992 rolled/forged and

    normalized having grain size No.5 or finer to ASTM/E-10-39T.

    3.2 Personnel engaged in testing: Testing of Axles shall be done only by trained

    and certified personnel having valid RDSO certificate. Under no

    circumstances testing shall be carried out by any other personnel not

    meeting this requirement.

    3.3 Scanning techniques :

    3 .3.1 Far end scanning : This technique shall be used for testing the full length

    of the axle from gear end as well from free end .

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 250mm per main scale division of

    compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm

    dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable couplant.

    The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic

    coupling while proving from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected signals

    have been shown in Annexure.

  • Page 3 of 75

    3.3.2 Examination by Trace Delay Technique: This technique shall be employed to examine the axle in part of 500 mm each. This

    technique may be utilized for confirmation of the findings during

    Far End scanning.

    The expected signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.3 Near End - Low Angle Scanning: This technique is used for examination of fatigue cracks in the raised seat inner fillet area, which remains

    unscanned during far end scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 100 mm per main scale

    division for compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having

    15/20 mm dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable

    couplant. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper

    acoustic coupling while probing from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected

    signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.4 High Angle Scanning : This technique may be employed for confirmation of the findings during Near End Low Angle

    Scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50 mm per main scale division

    for shear wave with the help of 50 mm dia. X 182 mm long steel

    bar (since 5 X 182 = 910 mm longitudinal wave is equivalent to 5 X

    100 mm = 500 mm of shear wave).

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50mm per main scale division of

    shear wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm dia shall

    be placed on the body of the axle at a distance of 120 mm from wheel

    seat inner fillet with suitable couplant directing the central beam

    towards wheel seat inner fillet. The probe shall be given slight rotary

    movement for proper acoustic coupling. The expected signals have

    been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.5 Scale expansion: The analysis of oscillogram pattern having closely placed

    echoes may be simplified by expanding the relevant part of the

    pattern. This can be done with the scale expansion control provided

    in the machine.

    4. IMPORTANT NOTE :

    1. Prior to ultrasonic testing it may be ensured that the axle end faces are

    smooth for achieving proper acoustic coupling. If required, the end

    faces of the Axle should be properly smoothened by filing /emery

    finishing for achieving proper acoustic coupling.

  • Page 4 of 75

    2. In low angle and high angle scanning the onset of the signal in relation to the initial pulse is a function of the thickness of the perspex wedge

    at the probe index marking and the velocity of the ultrasonic wave in

    the perspex.

    3. If the thickness of the perspex wedge at the probe index marking is more than the one used for the preparation of this code, the onset of

    the signal is likely to shift towards right side of the standard position of

    the signal.

    4. It may be ensured that, calibration and sensitivity setting shall be

    carried out before ultrasonic testing of the axles.

    5. Various characteristics of the equipment and probes may be checked as

    per IS-12666 at least once a month.

    5. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE :

    (a) Axle found to produce flaw signal other than those standard signals as

    shown in the relevant trace patterns during scanning by Far End and

    Near End Low Angle Scanning techniques shall be withdrawn from

    service. Further confirmation of the defect may be carried out by Trace

    Delay & high angle scanning.

    (b) Axle found to produce signals as per the standard signals as given in

    the Annexure should be declared satisfactory.

    (c) During service, few standard signals may disappear due to change in the geometrical configuration of axle. This aspect may be kept in view.

    6. MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING:

    Axles found defective during ultrasonic examination described above

    should be subjected to magnetic particle examination after removal of

    the wheels, bearings etc. as the case may be. Record of magnetic

    particle examination and observations made shall be maintained in the

    register.

    7. RECORDING OF TEST DETAILS:

    Ultrasonic personnel conducting the test shall maintain a register

    indicating the complete details of axle identification, technique

    employed, observation made , code of procedure followed and his

    remarks. He should also record his observations on visual examination

    of the axles.

  • Page 5 of 75

    Annexure-I

    Theoretical calculations and relative positions of signals of axle of Tie

    Tamping Machine UD62.4901 SP 1668/1676 axle for 08-275 of Plasser India

    Pvt. Ltd. (Tentative).

    (A) FAR END SCANNING : 1 Main Scale Div. = 250 mm (compression wave)

    Probe: 20/25, 2.5 MHz

    From ‘X’ End:

    Sl

    No.

    DETAILS Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end. 2162 8.6

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2021 8.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1669 mm from probing end

    1942 7.8

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1669 mm from probing end

    1819 7.3

    5. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1669 mm from probing end

    1669 6.7

    6. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 594 2.4

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 1.9

    8. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 1.3

  • Page 6 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End Side:

    SL.

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end 2162 8.6

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2021 8.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    954 mm from probing end

    1227 4.9

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    954 mm from probing end

    1104 4.4

    5. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    954 mm from probing end

    954 3.8

    6. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 594 2.4

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 1.9

    8. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 1.3

    (B) TRACE DELAY SCANNING:

    From ‘X’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S.NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 6.4

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 9.4

  • Page 7 of 75

    500 mm- 1000 mm

    S. NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 94 1.9

    1000mm - 1500 mm NIL

    1500mm - 2000 mm:

    S.NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1669 mm from probing end

    169 3.4

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1669 mm from probing end

    319 6.4

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1669 mm from probing end

    442 8.8

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S.NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm)

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from journal fillet 21 0.4

    2. Direct reflection from axle end 162 3.2

    From ‘Y’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S.NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 6.4

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 9.4

  • Page 8 of 75

    500 mm - 1000 mm:

    S. NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 94 1.9

    2. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of 954

    mm from probing end

    454 9.1

    1000mm - 1500 mm:

    S.

    NO.

    DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of 954

    mm from probing end

    104 2.1

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of 954

    mm from probing end

    227 4.5

    1500mm - 2000 mm : NIL

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S.NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm)

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from journal fillet 21 0.4

    2. Direct reflection from axle end 162 3.2

  • Page 9 of 75

    (C) NEAR END LOW ANGLE SCANNING 1 Main Scale Div. = 50mm

    (Compressive Wave)

    Probe : 15/20mm, 2.5 MHz

    FROM ’X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 17.5, Central beam at 36mm from

    edge of axle)

    340 6.8

    HIGH ANGLE SCANNING: 1 Main Scale Div. = 50 mm (Shear wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm. , 2.5 MHz

    From ‘X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from gear seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 37 with dia. of curvature 140mm,

    Stand off distance 120 mm from wheel seat

    inner fillet.)

    194 3.9

  • Page 10 of 75

  • Page 11 of 75

    CODE OF PROCEDURE OF ULTRASONIC TESTING OF TRACK

    MACHINE WN02-120.184.1 SP 1. 1668/1676 AXLE FOR 08-275 3S, DGS-62,

    09-3X & UNIMAT COMPACT M OF M/s PLASSER INDIA Pvt. Ltd. IN

    SERVICE (TENTATIVE).

    1. SCOPE : To ensure safety and reliability of rolling stocks, axles are

    required to be examined periodically for presence of cracks. This

    code stipulates the testing procedure, calibration method and

    sensitivity setting for detection of cracks in Track Machine WN02-

    120.184.1 SP1. 1668/1676 AXLE FOR 08-275 3S, DGS-62, 09-3X &

    UNIMAT COMPACT M of M/s Plasser India Pvt. Ltd. in service.

    2. NORMATED REFERENCES: The following RDSO / IS standards contain

    provisions, which through reference in this text constitute provisions of

    this code of procedure. At the time of publication, the editions

    indicated were valid.

    Specification No. Title

    RDSO specification No.

    M&C/NDT/104/2000

    (Rev.1) April 2005

    or

    Technical specification for battery cum-

    mains operated ultrasonic flaw detector

    having memory calibration and 100 mm X

    80 mm screen.

    RDSO specification

    No.M&C/NDT/125/2004

    Portable digital ultrasonic flaw detector with

    A-scan storage.

    RDSO specification No.

    WD-17-MISC-92

    Soft grease

    IS:1628-1986

    Reaffirmed in Feb.1996

    Axle oil

    IS: 1875-1992 Carbon steel billets, blooms, slabs and bars

    for forging.

    IS:12666-1988

    Reaffirmed in 1993

    Methods for performance assessment of

    ultrasonic flaw detection equipment.

  • Page 12 of 75

    3. PROCEDURE OF EXAMINATION:

    3.1 Equipment and accessories to be employed:

    3.1.1 Equipment: Ultrasonic flaw detector approved by RDSO, Lucknow to

    RDSO specification No.M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April 2005 or

    No. M&C/NDT/125/2004 or any other ultrasonic flaw detector

    meeting RDSO specification No. M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April

    2005 or No. M&C/NDT/125/2004.

    3.1.2 Accessories : Far end scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics.

    Near end low angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 15/20 mm

    dia., Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with

    perspex wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 17.5o angle or

    angle probe of 17.50 .

    High angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with perspex

    wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 37 o

    angle or angle

    probe of 370 having dia. of curvature 160 +

    200 mm .

    3.1.3 Couplant: Soft grease or axle oil (medium) to RDSO specification No. WD-

    17- MISC-92 or IS :1628 (86) Reaffirmed in Feb. 96 .

    3.1.4 Standard bar : 50mm dia. x 500 mm long and 50mm dia. X 182 mm long

    steel bar to designation 45C8 of IS:1875 –1992 rolled/forged and

    normalized having grain size No.5 or finer to ASTM/E-10-39T.

    3.2 Personnel engaged in testing: Testing of Axles shall be done only by trained

    and certified personnel having valid RDSO certificate. Under no

    circumstances testing shall be carried out by any other personnel not

    meeting this requirement.

    3.3 Scanning techniques :

    3 .3.1 Far end scanning : This technique shall be used for testing the full

    length of the axle from gear end as well from free end .

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 250mm per main scale division of

    compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm

    dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable couplant.

    The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic

    coupling while proving from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected signals

    have been shown in Annexure.

  • Page 13 of 75

    3.3.2 Examination by Trace Delay Technique: This technique shall be

    employed to examine the axle in part of 500 mm each. This technique

    may be utilized for confirmation of the findings during Far End

    scanning.

    The expected signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.3 Near End - Low Angle Scanning: This technique is used for

    examination of fatigue cracks in the raised seat inner fillet area, which

    remains unscanned during far end scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 100 mm per main scale division

    of compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 15/20 mm

    dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable couplant. The

    probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic coupling

    while probing from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected signals have been

    shown in Annexure.

    3.3.4 High Angle Scanning : This technique may be employed for

    confirmation of the findings during Near End Low Angle Scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50 mm per main scale division for

    shear wave with the help of 50 mm dia. X 182 mm long steel bar (since

    5 X 182 = 910 mm longitudinal wave is equivalent to 5 X 100 mm = 500

    mm of shear wave).

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50mm per main scale division of shear

    wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm dia shall be placed

    on the body of the axle at a distance of 130 mm from wheel seat inner fillet

    with suitable couplant directing the central beam towards wheel seat inner

    fillet. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic

    coupling. The expected signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.5 Scale expansion: The analysis of oscillogram pattern having closely placed

    echoes may be simplified by expanding the relevant part of the

    pattern. This can be done with the scale expansion control

    provided in the machine.

    4. IMPORTANT NOTE :

    1. Prior to ultrasonic testing it may be ensured that the axle end faces are

    smooth for achieving proper acoustic coupling. If required, the end faces of

    the Axle should be properly smoothened by filing /emery finishing for

    achieving proper acoustic coupling.

    2. In low angle and high angle scanning the onset of the signal in relation to the initial pulse is a function of the thickness of the perspex wedge at the

    probe index marking and the velocity of the ultrasonic wave in the perspex.

  • Page 14 of 75

    3. If the thickness of the perspex wedge at the probe index marking is more than the one used for the preparation of this code, the onset of

    the signal is likely to shift towards right side of the standard position of

    the signal.

    4. It may be ensured that, calibration and sensitivity setting shall be carried

    out before ultrasonic testing of the axles.

    5. Various characteristics of the equipment and probes may be checked as

    per IS-12666 at least once a month.

    5. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE:

    (a) Axle found to produce flaw signal other than those standard signals as

    shown in the relevant trace patterns during scanning by Far End and

    Near End Low Angle Scanning techniques shall be withdrawn from

    service. Further confirmation of the defect may be carried out by Trace

    Delay & high angle scanning.

    (b) Axle found to produce signals as per the standard signals as given in

    the Annexure should be declared satisfactory.

    (c) During service, few standard signals may disappear due to change in the

    geometrical configuration of axle. This aspect may be kept in view.

    6. MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING:

    Axles found defective during ultrasonic examination described above

    should be subjected to magnetic particle examination after removal of

    the wheels, bearings etc. as the case may be. Record of magnetic

    particle examination and observations made shall be maintained in the

    register.

    7. RECORDING OF TEST DETAILS:

    Ultrasonic personnel conducting the test shall maintain a register

    indicating the complete details of axle identification, technique

    employed, observation made , code of procedure followed and his

    remarks. He should also record his observations on visual examination

    of the axles.

  • Page 15 of 75

    Annexure-I

    Theoretical calculations and relative positions of signals of axle of Track

    Machine WN 02-120.184.1 SP1. 1668/1676 for 08-275 3S, DGS-62, 09-3X &

    UNIMAT COMPACT M of Plasser India Pvt. Ltd. (Tentative).

    (A) FAR END SCANNING : 1 Main Scale Div. = 250 mm (compression wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm, 2.5 MHz

    From ‘X’ End Side:

    SL .

    No.

    DETAILS Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end. 2162 8.6

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2021 8.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1212 mm from probing end

    1525 6.1

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1212 mm from probing end

    1384 5.5

    5. *Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance

    of 1212 mm from probing end

    1212 4.8

    6. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 634.5 2.5

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 493.5 2.0

    8. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321.5 1.3

  • Page 16 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End Side:

    SL.

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end 2162 8.6

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2021 8.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1428 mm from probing end

    1741 7.0

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1428 mm from probing end

    1600 6.4

    5. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1428 mm from probing end

    1428 5.7

    6. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 634.5 2.5

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 493.5 2.0

    8. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321.5 1.3

    (B) TRACE DELAY SCANNING:

    From ‘X’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S.NO. DETAILS DISTANCE

    (mm)

    SIGNAL

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321.5 6.4

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 493.5 9.9

    500 mm- 1000 mm

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 134.5 2.7

  • Page 17 of 75

    1000mm - 1500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1212 mm from probing end

    212 4.2

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1212 mm from probing end

    384 7.7

    1500mm - 2000 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1212 mm from probing end

    25 0.5

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from journal fillet 21 0.4

    2. Direct reflection from axle end 162 3.2

  • Page 18 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 6.4

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 9.4

    500 mm - 1000 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 134.5 2.7

    1000mm - 1500 mm:

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1428 mm from probing end

    428 8.6

    1500mm - 2000 mm :

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1428 mm from probing end

    100 2.0

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1428 mm from probing end

    241 4.8

  • Page 19 of 75

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from journal fillet 21 0.4

    2. Direct reflection from axle end 162 3.2

    (C) NEAR END LOW ANGLE SCANNING 1 Main Scale Div. = 50mm

    (Compressive Wave)

    Probe : 15/20mm, 2.5 MHz

    FROM ’X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 17.5, Central beam at 38 mm from

    edge of the axle)

    344 6.9

    HIGH ANGLE SCANNING: 1 Main Scale Div. = 50 mm (Shear wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm. , 2.5 MHz, Wedge 37

    From ‘X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 37 with dia. of curvature 160mm,

    Stand off distance 130 mm from wheel seat

    inner fillet.)

    224 4.5

  • Page 20 of 75

  • Page 21 of 75

    CODE OF PROCEDURE OF ULTRASONIC TESTING OF TRACK

    MACHINE 64.02.2249 AXLE FOR RM 80. FRM 80 & RM 76 OF M/s

    PLASSER INDIA Pvt. Ltd. IN SERVICE (TENTATIVE).

    1. SCOPE : To ensure safety and reliability of rolling stocks, axles are

    required to be examined periodically for presence of cracks. This

    code stipulates the testing procedure, calibration method and

    sensitivity setting for detection of cracks in Track Machine

    64.02.2249 Axle for RM 80. FRM 80 & RM 76 OF M/s Plasser India

    Pvt. Ltd. in service.

    2. NORMATED REFERENCES: The following RDSO / IS standards contain

    provisions, which through reference in this text constitute provisions of

    this code of procedure. At the time of publication, the editions

    indicated were valid.

    Specification No. Title

    RDSO specification No.

    M&C/NDT/104/2000

    (Rev.1) April 2005

    or

    Technical specification for battery cum-

    mains operated ultrasonic flaw detector

    having memory calibration and 100 mm X

    80 mm screen.

    RDSO specification

    No.M&C/NDT/125/2004

    Portable digital ultrasonic flaw detector with

    A-scan storage.

    RDSO specification No.

    WD-17-MISC-92

    Soft grease

    IS:1628-1986

    Reaffirmed in Feb.1996

    Axle oil

    IS: 1875-1992 Carbon steel billets, blooms, slabs and bars

    for forging.

    IS:12666-1988

    Reaffirmed in 1993

    Methods for performance assessment of

    ultrasonic flaw detection equipment.

  • Page 22 of 75

    3. PROCEDURE OF EXAMINATION:

    3.1 Equipment and accessories to be employed:

    3.1.1 Equipment: Ultrasonic flaw detector approved by RDSO, Lucknow to

    RDSO specification No.M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April 2005 or

    No. M&C/NDT/125/2004 or any other ultrasonic flaw detector

    meeting RDSO specification No. M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April

    2005 or No. M&C/NDT/125/2004.

    3.1.2 Accessories : Far end scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics.

    Near end low angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 15/20 mm

    dia., Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with

    perspex wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 17.5o angle or

    angle probe of 17.50 .

    High angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with perspex

    wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 37 o

    angle or angle

    probe of 370 having dia. of curvature 155 +

    200 mm .

    3.1.3 Couplant: Soft grease or axle oil (medium) to RDSO specification No. WD-

    17- MISC-92 or IS :1628 (86) Reaffirmed in Feb. 96 .

    3.1.4 Standard bar : 50mm dia. x 500 mm long and 50mm dia. X 182 mm long

    steel bar to designation 45C8 of IS:1875 –1992 rolled/forged and

    normalized having grain size No.5 or finer to ASTM/E-10-39T.

    3.2 Personnel engaged in testing: Testing of Axles shall be done only by trained

    and certified personnel having valid RDSO certificate. Under no

    circumstances testing shall be carried out by any other personnel not

    meeting this requirement.

    3.3 Scanning techniques :

    3 .3.1 Far end scanning : This technique shall be used for testing the full

    length of the axle from gear end as well from free end .

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 250mm per main scale division of

    compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm

    dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable couplant.

    The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic

    coupling while proving from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected signals

    have been shown in Annexure.

  • Page 23 of 75

    3.3.2 Examination by Trace Delay Technique: This technique shall be

    employed to examine the axle in part of 500 mm each. This technique

    may be utilized for confirmation of the findings during Far End

    scanning.

    The expected signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.3 Near End - Low Angle Scanning: This technique is used for

    examination of fatigue cracks in the raised seat inner fillet area,

    which remains unscanned during far end scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 100 mm per main scale

    division of compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having

    15/20 mm dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable

    couplant. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper

    acoustic coupling while probing from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected

    signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.4 High Angle Scanning : This technique may be employed for

    confirmation of the findings during Near End Low Angle

    Scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50 mm per main scale division

    for shear wave with the help of 50 mm dia. X 182 mm long steel

    bar (since 5 X 182 = 910 mm longitudinal wave is equivalent to 5 X

    100 mm = 500 mm of shear wave).

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50mm per main scale division of

    shear wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm dia shall

    be placed on the body of the axle at a distance of 132 mm from wheel

    seat inner fillet with suitable couplant directing the central beam

    towards wheel seat inner fillet. The probe shall be given slight rotary

    movement for proper acoustic coupling. The expected signals have

    been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.5 Scale expansion: The analysis of oscillogram pattern having closely placed

    echoes may be simplified by expanding the relevant part of the

    pattern. This can be done with the scale expansion control

    provided in the machine.

    4. IMPORTANT NOTE :

    1. Prior to ultrasonic testing it may be ensured that the axle end faces are

    smooth for achieving proper acoustic coupling. If required, the end

    faces of the Axle should be properly smoothened by filing /emery

    finishing for achieving proper acoustic coupling.

  • Page 24 of 75

    2. In low angle and high angle scanning the onset of the signal in relation

    to the initial pulse is a function of the thickness of the perspex wedge

    at the probe index marking and the velocity of the ultrasonic wave in

    the perspex.

    3. If the thickness of the perspex wedge at the probe index marking is more

    than the one used for the preparation of this code, the onset of the

    signal is likely to shift towards right side of the standard position of the

    signal.

    4. It may be ensured that, calibration and sensitivity setting shall be carried

    out before ultrasonic testing of the axles.

    5. Various characteristics of the equipment and probes may be checked as

    per IS-12666 at least once a month.

    5. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE:

    (a) Axle found to produce flaw signal other than those standard signals as

    shown in the relevant trace patterns during scanning by Far End and

    Near End Low Angle Scanning techniques shall be withdrawn from

    service. Further confirmation of the defect may be carried out by Trace

    Delay & high angle scanning.

    (b) Axle found to produce signals as per the standard signals as given in

    the Annexure should be declared satisfactory.

    (c) During service, few standard signals may disappear due to change in the

    geometrical configuration of axle. This aspect may be kept in view.

    6. MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING:

    Axles found defective during ultrasonic examination described above

    should be subjected to magnetic particle examination after removal of

    the wheels, bearings etc. as the case may be. Record of magnetic

    particle examination and observations made shall be maintained in the

    register.

    7. RECORDING OF TEST DETAILS:

    Ultrasonic personnel conducting the test shall maintain a register

    indicating the complete details of axle identification, technique

    employed, observation made , code of procedure followed and his

    remarks. He should also record his observations on visual examination

    of the axles.

  • Page 25 of 75

    Annexure-I

    Theoretical calculations and relative positions of signals of axle of Track

    Machine 64.02.2249 axle for RM80. FRM80 & RM 76 M/s Plasser India Pvt.

    Ltd. (Tentative).

    (A) FAR END SCANNING : 1 Main Scale Div. = 250 mm (compression wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm, 2.5 MHz

    From ‘X’ End Side:

    SL .

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end. 2211 8.8

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2098 8.4

    3. Direct reflection from wheel seat outer fillet 2032.5 8.1

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1377.5 mm from probing end

    1682 6.7

    5. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1377.5mm from probing end

    1545 6.2

    6. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1377.5mm from probing end

    1377.5 5.5

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 662 2.6

    8. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 525 2.1

    9. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 357.5 1.4

  • Page 26 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End Side:

    SL.

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end 2211 8.8

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2098 8.4

    3. Direct reflection from wheel seat outer fillet 2032.5 8.1

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1574.5 mm from probing end

    1879 7.5

    5. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1574.5 mm from probing end

    1742 7.0

    6. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1574.5mm from probing end

    1574.5 6.3

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 662 2.6

    8. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 525 2.1

    9. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 357.5 1.4

    (B) TRACE DELAY SCANNING:

    From ‘X’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 357.5 7.2

    500 mm- 1000 mm

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 25 0.5

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 162 3.2

  • Page 27 of 75

    1000mm - 1500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1377.5mm from probing end

    377.5 7.6

    1500mm - 2000 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1377.5 mm from probing end

    45 0.9

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1377.5 mm from probing end

    182 3.6

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat outer fillet 32.5 0.7

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 98 2.0

    3. Direct reflection from axle end 211 4.2

  • Page 28 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 357.5 7.2

    500 mm - 1000 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 25 0.5

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 162 3.2

    1000mm - 1500 mm: NIL

    1500mm - 2000 mm :

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1574.5 mm from probing end

    74.5 0.9

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1574.5 mm from probing end

    242 4.8

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1574.5 mm from probing end

    379 7.0

  • Page 29 of 75

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat outer fillet 32.5 0.7

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 98 2.0

    3. Direct reflection from axle end 211 4.2

    (C) NEAR END LOW ANGLE SCANNING 1 Main Scale Div. = 50mm

    (Compressive Wave)

    Probe : 15/20mm, 2.5 MHz

    FROM ’X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 17.5, Central beam at 28 mm from

    edge of the axle)

    380 7.6

    HIGH ANGLE SCANNING: 1 Main Scale Div. = 50 mm (Shear wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm. , 2.5 MHz

    From ‘X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 37 with dia. of curvature 155mm,

    Stand off distance 132 mm from wheel seat

    inner fillet.)

    216 4.3

  • Page 30 of 75

  • Page 31 of 75

    CODE OF PROCEDURE OF ULTRASONIC TESTING OF TRACK

    MACHINE UD62.3301 SP 1668/1676 (DRIVING) AXLE FOR 09-32 CSM &

    08-32 DUOMATIC OF M/s PLASSER INDIA Pvt. Ltd. IN SERVICE

    (TENTATIVE).

    1. SCOPE : To ensure safety and reliability of rolling stocks, axles are

    required to be examined periodically for presence of cracks. This

    code stipulates the testing procedure, calibration method and

    sensitivity setting for detection of cracks in Track Machine

    UD62.3301 SP 1668/1676 (Driving) Axle for 09-32 CSM & 08-32

    Duomatic of M/s PLASSER INDIA Pvt. Ltd. in service.

    2. NORMATED REFERENCES: The following RDSO / IS standards contain

    provisions, which through reference in this text constitute provisions of

    this code of procedure. At the time of publication, the editions

    indicated were valid.

    Specification No. Title

    RDSO specification No.

    M&C/NDT/104/2000

    (Rev.1) April 2005

    or

    Technical specification for battery cum-

    mains operated ultrasonic flaw detector

    having memory calibration and 100 mm X

    80 mm screen.

    RDSO specification

    No.M&C/NDT/125/2004

    Portable digital ultrasonic flaw detector with

    A-scan storage.

    RDSO specification No.

    WD-17-MISC-92

    Soft grease

    IS:1628-1986

    Reaffirmed in Feb.1996

    Axle oil

    IS: 1875-1992 Carbon steel billets, blooms, slabs and bars

    for forging.

    IS:12666-1988

    Reaffirmed in 1993

    Methods for performance assessment of

    ultrasonic flaw detection equipment.

  • Page 32 of 75

    3. PROCEDURE OF EXAMINATION:

    3.1 Equipment and accessories to be employed:

    3.1.1 Equipment: Ultrasonic flaw detector approved by RDSO, Lucknow to

    RDSO specification No.M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April 2005 or

    No. M&C/NDT/125/2004 or any other ultrasonic flaw detector

    meeting RDSO specification No. M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April

    2005 or No. M&C/NDT/125/2004.

    3.1.2 Accessories : Far end scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics.

    Near end low angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 15/20 mm

    dia., Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with

    perspex wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 17.5o angle or

    angle probe of 17.50 .

    High angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with perspex

    wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 37 o

    angle or angle

    probe of 370 having dia. of curvature 144 +

    200 mm .

    3.1.3 Couplant: Soft grease or axle oil (medium) to RDSO specification No. WD-

    17- MISC-92 or IS :1628 (86) Reaffirmed in Feb. 96 .

    3.1.4 Standard bar : 50mm dia. x 500 mm long and 50mm dia. X 182 mm long

    steel bar to designation 45C8 of IS:1875 –1992 rolled/forged and

    normalized having grain size No.5 or finer to ASTM/E-10-39T.

    3.2 Personnel engaged in testing: Testing of Axles shall be done only by trained

    and certified personnel having valid RDSO certificate. Under no

    circumstances testing shall be carried out by any other personnel not

    meeting this requirement.

    3.3 Scanning techniques :

    3.3.1 Far end scanning : This technique shall be used for testing the full length

    of the axle from gear end as well from free end .

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 250mm per main scale division of

    compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm dia shall

    be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable couplant. The probe shall

    be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic coupling while proving

    from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected signals have been shown in Annexure.

  • Page 33 of 75

    3.3.2 Examination by Trace Delay Technique: This technique shall be

    employed to examine the axle in part of 500 mm each. This

    technique may be utilized for confirmation of the findings during

    Far End scanning.

    The expected signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.3 Near End - Low Angle Scanning: This technique is used for

    examination of fatigue cracks in the raised seat inner fillet area,

    which remains unscanned during far end scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 100 mm per main scale

    division

    of compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 15/20

    mm dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable

    couplant. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper

    acoustic coupling while probing from ‘X’ end & ‘Y’ end. The expected

    signals have been shown in Annexure.

    3.3.4 High Angle Scanning : This technique may be employed for

    confirmation of the findings during Near End Low Angle

    Scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50 mm per main scale division

    for shear wave with the help of 50 mm dia. X 182 mm long steel bar

    (since 5 X 182 = 910 mm longitudinal wave is equivalent to 5 X 100

    mm = 500 mm of shear wave).

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50mm per main scale division of

    shear wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm dia shall be

    placed on the body of the axle at a distance of 132 mm from wheel seat

    inner fillet with suitable couplant directing the central beam towards

    wheel seat inner fillet. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement

    for proper acoustic coupling. The expected signals have been shown in

    Annexure.

    3.3.5 Scale expansion: The analysis of oscillogram pattern having closely placed

    echoes may be simplified by expanding the relevant part of the

    pattern. This can be done with the scale expansion control provided

    in the machine.

    4. IMPORTANT NOTE :

    1. Prior to ultrasonic testing it may be ensured that the axle end faces are

    smooth for achieving proper acoustic coupling. If required, the end

    faces of the Axle should be properly smoothened by filing /emery

    finishing for achieving proper acoustic coupling.

  • Page 34 of 75

    2. In low angle and high angle scanning the onset of the signal in relation

    to the initial pulse is a function of the thickness of the perspex wedge

    at the probe index marking and the velocity of the ultrasonic wave in

    the perspex.

    3. If the thickness of the perspex wedge at the probe index marking is more

    than the one used for the preparation of this code, the onset of the

    signal is likely to shift towards right side of the standard position of the

    signal.

    4. It may be ensured that, calibration and sensitivity setting shall be carried

    out before ultrasonic testing of the axles.

    5. Various characteristics of the equipment and probes may be checked as

    per IS-12666 at least once a month.

    5. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE:

    (a) Axle found to produce flaw signal other than those standard signals as

    shown in the relevant trace patterns during scanning by Far End and

    Near End Low Angle Scanning techniques shall be withdrawn from

    service. Further confirmation of the defect may be carried out by Trace

    Delay & high angle scanning.

    (b) Axle found to produce signals as per the standard signals as given in

    the Annexure should be declared satisfactory.

    (c) During service, few standard signals may disappear due to change in the

    geometrical configuration of axle. This aspect may be kept in view.

    6. MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING:

    Axles found defective during ultrasonic examination described above

    should be subjected to magnetic particle examination after removal of

    the wheels, bearings etc. as the case may be. Record of magnetic

    particle examination and observations made shall be maintained in the

    register.

    7. RECORDING OF TEST DETAILS:

    Ultrasonic personnel conducting the test shall maintain a register

    indicating the complete details of axle identification, technique

    employed, observation made , code of procedure followed and his

    remarks. He should also record his observations on visual examination

    of the axles.

  • Page 35 of 75

    Annexure-I

    Theoretical calculations and relative positions of signals of axle of Tie

    Tamping Machine UD62.3301 SP 1668/1676 (Driving) for 09-32 CSM & 08-32

    Duomatic of M/s Plasser India Pvt. Ltd. (Tentative).

    (A)FAR END SCANNING : 1 Main Scale Div. = 250 mm (compression wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm, 2.5 MHz

    From ‘X’ End Side:

    SL .

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end. 2162 8.6

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2021 8.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    1690 6.8

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    1567 6.3

    5. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    1417 5.7

    6. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1185 mm from probing end

    1481 5.9

    7. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1185 mm from probing end

    1347.5 5.4

    8. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1185 mm from probing end

    1185 4.7

    9. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 594 2.4

    10. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 1.9

    11. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 1.3

  • Page 36 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End Side:

    SL.

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end 2162 8.6

    2. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2021 8.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1206 mm from probing end

    1479 5.9

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1206 mm from probing end

    1356 5.4

    5. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1206 mm from probing end

    1206 4.8

    6. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 594 2.4

    7. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 1.9

    8. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 1.3

    (B) TRACE DELAY SCANNING:

    From ‘X’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 6.4

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 9.4

    500 mm- 1000 mm

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 94 1.9

  • Page 37 of 75

    1000mm - 1500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1206 mm from probing end

    206 4.1

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1206 mm from probing end

    356 7.1

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1206 mm from probing end

    479 9.6

    1500mm - 2000 mm: NIL

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from journal fillet 21 0.4

    2. Direct reflection from axle end 162 3.2

  • Page 38 of 75

    From ‘Y’ End: ( 1 main scale div. = 50 mm)

    0-500 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 321 6.4

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 471 9.4

    500 mm - 1000 mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 94 1.9

    1000mm - 1500 mm:

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1185 mm from probing end

    185 3.7

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1185 mm from probing end

    347.5 7.0

    3. Direct reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    417 8.3

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1185 mm from probing end

    481 9.6

    1500mm - 2000 mm :

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    367 7.3

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    490 9.8

  • Page 39 of 75

    2000mm - 2500 mm:

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from journal fillet 21 0.4

    2. Direct reflection from axle end 162 3.2

    (C) NEAR END LOW ANGLE SCANNING 1 Main Scale Div. = 50mm

    (Compressive Wave)

    Probe : 15/20mm, 2.5 MHz

    FROM ’X’ & ‘Y’ END SIDE :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 17.5, Central beam at 38 mm from

    edge of the axle)

    340 6.8

    HIGH ANGLE SCANNING: 1 Main Scale Div. = 50 mm (Shear wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm. , 2.5 MHz., Wedge 37

    From ‘X’ & ‘Y’ END :

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal Echo

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 37 with dia. of curvature 144mm,

    Stand off distance 144 mm from wheel seat

    inner fillet.)

    100 3.0

  • Page 40 of 75

    METHOD OF ULTRASONIC TESTING & ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR LOCOMOTIVE WHEELS

    (RDSO Report No.IRS R–34-2003

    (TO BE USED FOR WHEELS OF LARGE TRACK MACHINES ALSO)

    For detecting internal discontinuities in the rim and the hub of the wheel, ultrasonic inspection shall be carried out by following the procedure shown below and by using equipment which complies with the following requirements. Reference standard used for sensitivity setting shall be from wheels conforming to this standard. The surface finish of probing face shall be in accordance with the relevant wheel drawing. Ultrasonic inspection shall be performed after final thermal and machining operations.

    A-1 ULTRASONIC TESTING ON WHEEL RIM

    The rims of the wheels will be checked through ultrasonic inspection to detect the defects at two orientations.

    i) Defect parallel to the rim face (axial testing)

    ii) Defect parallel to the running tread (radial testing)

    A-1-1 AXIAL TESTING

    All wheels will be subjected to ultrasonic testing of rim through probing axially along the rim face to defect any flaw having orientation parallel to the rim face.

    A-1-1-1 Equipment:

    A-1-1-1-1 Automatic ultrasonic testing equipment shall be used. The instrument shall have a pulse echo transmitter and receiver and shall have an operating frequency range of 2 to 5 MHz. The manufacturer shall have on-line test facility to inspect 100% wheels. For determination of final rejection, manual ultrasonic equipments approved by the purchaser may be employed.

    A-1-1-1-2 The transducers shall be of normal (o degree) type comprising of high sensitivity Piezo electric ceramic crystal operating at 2 to 2.5 MHz frequency and of 18-20 mm diameter.

    A-1-1-1-3 An automatic flaw system shall be used in conjunction with the ultrasonic instrumentation to facilitate flaw indication beyond acceptable level.

  • Page 41 of 75

    A-1-1-1-4 An immersion or contact type testing technique shall be used in automatic on-line testing. For manual testing of suspect wheels a suitable couplant shall be used between the test surface and

    the transducer. In case of dispute in respect of couplant the decision of the inspecting officer shall be final and binding.

    A-1-1-1-5 Calibration block 50mm x 50mm x 50mm block of steel to grade 45C8 of IS:1875.

    A-1-1-1-6 Standard reference piece shall be from a portion of the wheel having a 3 mm diameter flat bottom hole drilled perpendicular to the rim face and to a depth of 25 + 2mm at the mid thickness of the rim (see fig. 4.1).

    A-1-1-1-7 Alternate reference piece: Alternate reference piece shall be from a portion of the wheel having a small diameter hole of dia 3 mm drilled at a distance from the testing surface equal to the depth of the hole indicated in A-1.1.1.6 (see fig. 4.2). The instrument shall be adjusted to give an equal test value to that of

    a 3 mm diameter flat bottom hole.

    A - 1.1.2 Calibration

    A-1.1.2.1 Time base: Set the time base of ultrasonic flaw detector using 0 degree longitudinal wave with the help of calibration block as mentioned in para A-1.1.1.5. Three multiple echoes will be observed.

    A-1.1.2.2 Sensitivity setting: Sensitivity setting shall be done with the help of standard wheel piece (see fig. 4.1). Gain level should be adjusted to produce 60% height from the reference standard as mentioned in para A-1.1.1.6.

    A-1.1.2.3 Alternatively sensitivity setting shall be done with the help of an alternate reference piece as mentioned in para A-1.1.1.7 (see

    fig. 4.2) and shall be used only with the specific approval of the purchaser.

    A-1.1.2.4 Reference standard for the inspection of heat-treated wheels shall be fabricated from heat-treated wheels.

    A - 1.1.3 Scanning:

    A-1.1.3.1 Wheels shall be inspected axially from either the out side or inside rim face by automatic scanning see figs. 4.1 and 4.2. For determining acceptance or otherwise, probing from both sides may be carried out.

  • Page 42 of 75

    A-1.1.3.2 The speed of scanning shall permit efficient detection of the reference standard discontinuities.

    A - 1.1.4 Rejection criteria:

    A-1.1.4.1 Any wheel with a flaw indication equal to or larger than 60% of the full scale height shall be rejected. If more than 1 defect of amplitude 20% or above are observed, the wheel shall be rejected. If two defects of amplitude 20% or above are observed, and if these defects are closer than 50 mm the wheel shall be rejected.

    A-1.1.4.2 Ultrasonic indications that result from wheel geometry or spurious signal shall not be valid cause for rejection. The judgement of the inspecting officer shall be final and binding in this respect.

    A-1.1.4.3 The final disposal of rejection of wheels may be determined by manual resting of disputed areas. The surface finish of rim of reference standard will be almost same as that of wheels tested manually by contract probing.

    A - 1.2 RADIAL TESTING:

    All wheels will be subjected to ultrasonic testing of rim through probing circumferentially along the treat surface to detect any flaw having orientation parallel to the tread surface.

    A -1.2.1 Equipment:

    A-1.2.1.1 Equipment shall be same as described in clause A-1.1.1.

    A-1.2.1.2 Calibration Block: 50x50x50mm block of steel to grade 45C8 of IS:1875.

    A-1.2.1.3 Standard reference piece:

    Reference piece will be from a portion of new wheel having 3 mm diameter flat bottom hole drilled from opposite to tread surface (see fig.5) to depth of 20mm.

    A - 1.2.2 Calibration:

    A-1.2.2.1 Time Base: Set the time base of ultrasonic flaw detector using O degree longitudinal wave with the help of calibration block as mentioned in para A.1.2.1.2. Three multiple echoes will be observed.

  • Page 43 of 75

    A-1.2.2.2 Sensitivity setting: Sensitivity setting shall be done with the help of standard wheel piece as mentioned in para A-1.2.1.3 (see fig.5). Probing shall be done from the tread opposite to flat

    bottom hole and the gain level shall be adjusted to produce an echo of 60% height of vertical scale of CRT. This gain level shall be reference gain for acceptance or otherwise for the wheel.

    A - 1.2.3 Scanning :

    Increase the gain level by 6dB over and above the gain level described at para A-1.2.2.2. Apply couplant on the tread surface, place the probe on this face and scan entire circumference on the wheel in case of contact type automatic scanning equipment. For immersion type of equipment, the wave propagation shall be through the liquid used for immersing the wheel. No back echo will appear. Care shall be taken during probing to cover full width of the tread. In case a flaw

    signal is observed reduce the gain by 6 db.

    A-1.2.4 Rejection criteria:

    Any wheel with a flaw indication equal to or larger than 60% of the full scale height shall be rejected. If more than 3 defects of amplitude 20% or above are observed, the wheel shall be rejected. If two defects of amplitude 20% or above are observed, and if these defects are closer than 50 mm, the wheel shall be rejected.

    A-1.2.5 The final disposal of rejection of wheels may be determined by manual testing of disputed areas. The surface finish of tread of reference standard will be almost same as that of wheels tested manually by contact probing.

    A. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING ON WHEEL HUB

    Only such wheels, which pass ultrasonic test for the rim, shall be subjected to ultrasonic testing of hub.

    A - 2.1 Equipment:

    Equipment shall be the same as used for ultrasonic testing of the rim portion of the wheels, suitably calibrated for hub thickness. However, manual testing of hub will be permitted.

  • Page 44 of 75

    For hub testing, the back wall echo shall be adjusted to full screen height using a wheel hub free from internal discontinuities.

    Surface finish of reference piece shall be similar to wheels

    tested if manual testing is resorted to.

    A-2.2 Rejection criteria:

    A-2.2.1 Any wheel with a flaw indication equal to or larger than 60% of the full scale height shall be rejected. If more than 3 defects of amplitudes less than 60% are observed, the wheel shall be rejected. If two defects of amplitudes less than 60% are observed, and if these defects are closer than 50mm, the wheel shall be rejected.

    A-2.2.2 Where there is a partial suppression of the back echo and flaw echo is also absent the back echo shall not be less than 30% of the full screen height without change of testing parameters.

    MARKING: Wheel conforming to the above ultrasonic stipulations shall be

    stencilled ‘UT’ on the back plate with red colour paint using characters at least 25 mm in height or at such locations as may be shown on the drawing or specified by the purchaser.

  • Page 45 of 75

  • Page 46 of 75

  • Page 47 of 75

    CODE OF PROCEDURE OF ULTRASONIC TESTING FOR AXLE

    (POWERED) TO M/s PHOOLTAS TAMPER Pvt. Ltd., PATNA’s DRG. No.

    UTV1-01 02/00 REV. 0 IN SERVICE (TENTATIVE).

    1. SCOPE : To ensure safety and reliability of rolling stocks, axles are

    required to be examined periodically for presence of cracks. This code stipulates

    the testing procedure, calibration method and sensitivity setting for detection of in

    service cracks of Axle (Powered) to M/s Phooltas Tamper Pvt. Ltd., Patna’s Drg.

    No. UTV1-01 02/00 REV.0.

    2. NORMATED REFERENCES: The following RDSO / IS standards contain

    provisions, which through reference in this text constitute provisions of

    this code of procedure. At the time of publication, the editions

    indicated were valid.

    Specification No. Title

    RDSO specification No.

    M&C/NDT/104/2000

    (Rev.1) April 2005

    or

    Technical specification for battery cum-

    mains operated ultrasonic flaw detector

    having memory calibration and 100 mm X

    80 mm screen.

    RDSO specification

    No.M&C/NDT/125/2004

    Portable digital ultrasonic flaw detector with

    A-scan storage.

    RDSO specification No.

    WD-17-MISC-92

    Soft grease

    IS:1628-1986

    Reaffirmed in Feb.1996

    Axle oil

    IS: 1875-1992 Carbon steel billets, blooms, slabs and bars

    for forging.

    IS:12666-1988

    Reaffirmed in 1993

    Methods for performance assessment of

    ultrasonic flaw detection equipment.

  • Page 48 of 75

    3. PROCEDURE OF EXAMINATION:

    3.1 Equipment and accessories to be employed:

    3.1.1 Equipment: Ultrasonic flaw detector approved by RDSO, Lucknow to

    RDSO specification No.M&C/NDT/104/2000 (Rev.1) April 2005 or

    No. M&C/NDT/125/2004, July’2004 or any other ultrasonic flaw

    detector meeting RDSO specification No. M&C/NDT/104/2000

    (Rev.1) April 2005 or No. M&C/NDT/125/2004, July’2004.

    3.1.2 Accessories : Far end scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics.

    Near end low angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 15/20 mm

    dia., Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with

    perspex wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 15o angle or

    angle probe of 150 .

    High angle scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia.,

    Lead zirconate titanate or crystal of similar characteristics with perspex

    wedge capable of producing ultrasonic wave at 37.5 o

    angle or angle

    probe of 37.50 angle having dia. of curvature 176 +

    200 mm .

    3.1.3 Couplant: Soft grease or axle oil (medium) to RDSO specification No. WD-

    17- MISC-92 or IS :1628 (86) Reaffirmed in Feb. 96 .

    3.1.4 Standard bar : 50mm dia. x 500 mm long and 50mm dia. X 182 mm long

    steel bar to designation 45C8 of IS:1875 –1992 rolled/forged and

    normalized having grain size No.5 or finer to ASTM/E-10-39T.

    3.2 Personnel engaged in testing: Testing of Axles shall be done only by trained

    and certified personnel having valid RDSO certificate. Under no

    circumstances testing shall be carried out by any other personnel not

    meeting this requirement.

    3.3 Scanning techniques :

    3.3.1 Far end scanning : This technique shall be used for testing the full length

    of the axle from both the ends.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 250mm per main scale division of

    compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having 20/25 mm

    dia shall be placed on the clean axle end faces with suitable couplant.

    The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic

    coupling.

  • Page 49 of 75

    3.3.2 Examination by Trace Delay Technique: This technique shall be

    employed to examine the axle in part of 500 mm each. This

    technique may be utilized for confirmation of the findings during

    Far End scanning.

    3.3.3 Near End - Low Angle Scanning: This technique is used for

    examination of fatigue cracks if any, in the raised wheel seat inner

    fillet area, which remains unscanned during far end scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 100 mm per main scale

    division of compression wave. The normal probe of 2.5 MHz having

    15/20 mm dia fitted with a Perspex wedge capable of producing

    ultrasonic wave at 150 or angle probe of 15

    0 shall be placed on the axle

    end face directing the central beam towards the wheel seat inner fillet.

    The same procedure shall be followed for both the ends scanning.

    3.3.4 High Angle Scanning : This technique may be employed for

    confirmation of the findings during Near End Low Angle

    Scanning.

    The time scale shall be calibrated to 50 mm per main scale division

    for shear wave with the help of 50 mm dia. X 182 mm long steel

    bar (since 5 X 182 = 910 mm longitudinal wave is equivalent to 5 X

    100 mm = 500 mm of shear wave).

    High angle scanning is carried out from the body of the axle. The time

    scale shall be calibrated to 50mm per main scale division of shear

    wave with the help of 50mm dia. x 182 mm long steel bar ( since 5x

    182mm = 910 mm longitudinal wave is equivalent to 5 x 100 mm =

    500 mm of shear wave. A normal probe 20/25 mm dia fitted with

    Perspex wedge of 37.50 or angle probe of 37.5

    0 having dia of

    curvature 176 + 20

    0 mm shall be placed on the axle end facedirecting

    the central beam towards the wheel seat inner fillet. The same

    procedure shall be followed for both the ends scanningshall be placed

    on the body of the axle at a distance of 132 mm from wheel seat inner

    fillet with suitable couplant directing the central beam towards wheel

    seat inner fillet. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for

    proper acoustic coupling. The expected signals have been shown in

    Annexure.

    3.3.5 Scale expansion: The analysis of oscillogram pattern having closely placed

    echoes may be simplified by expanding the relevant part of the

    pattern. This can be done with the scale expansion control

    provided in the machine.

  • Page 50 of 75

    4. IMPORTANT NOTE :

    1. Prior to ultrasonic testing it may be ensured that the axle end faces are

    smooth for achieving proper acoustic coupling. If required, the end

    faces of the Axle should be properly smoothened by filing /emery

    finishing for achieving proper acoustic coupling.

    2. In low angle and high angle scanning the onset of the signal in relation

    to the initial pulse is a function of the thickness of the perspex wedge

    at the probe index marking and the velocity of the ultrasonic wave in

    the perspex.

    3. Various characteristics of the equipment and probes may be checked as

    per IS-12666 at least once a month.

    5. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE:

    (a) Axle found to produce flaw signal other than those standard signals as

    shown in Annexure ‘A’ during scanning by Far End and Near End

    Low Angle Scanning techniques shall be withdrawn from service.

    Further confirmation of the defect may be carried out by Trace Delay

    Annexure ‘B’ or high angle scanning technique Annexure ‘A’ as the

    case may be.

    (b) Axle found to produce signals as per the standard signals as given in

    the Annexure ‘A’ by Far End and Near End Low Angle Scanning

    technique should be declared satisfactory.

    (c) During service, few standard signals may disappear due to change in the

    geometrical configuration of axle. This aspect may be kept in view.

    6. MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING:

    Axles found defective during ultrasonic examination described above

    should be subjected to magnetic particle examination after removal of

    the wheels, bearings etc. as the case may be. Record of magnetic

    particle examination and observations made shall be maintained in the

    register.

    7. RECORDING OF TEST DETAILS:

    Ultrasonic personnel conducting the test shall maintain a register

    indicating the complete details of axle identification, technique

    employed, observation made , code of procedure followed and his

    remarks. He should also record his observations on visual examination

    of the axles.

  • Page 51 of 75

    Annexure- A

    Theoretical calculations and relative positions of signals for axle (powered) of

    M/s Phooltas Tamper Pvt. Ltd. Patna’s to Drg. No. UTVI-01 02/00 Rev.0 in

    service (Tentative).

    (B) FAR END SCANNING : 1 Main Scale Div. = 250 mm (compression wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm, 2.5 MHz

    Probing from Gear End Side:

    SL .

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end. 2390 9.6

    2. Delayed reflection from journal fillet 2376.5 9.5

    3. Delayed reflection from Wheel seat outer fillet 2294 9.2

    4. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2229 8.9

    5. Direct reflection from Wheel seat outer fillet 2125 8.5

    6. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1587 mm from probing end

    1911 7.6

    7. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    1767 7.0

    8. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1587mm from probing end

    1765 7.0

    9. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    1609.5 6.4

    10. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1587 mm from probing end

    1587 6.3

    11. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1417mm from probing end

    1417 5.7

    12. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 1393 5.6

  • Page 52 of 75

    13. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 1246 5.0

    14. Direct reflection from Gear seat fillet 1067 4.3

    15. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 778 3.1

    16. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 633 2.5

    17. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 456 1.8

    18. Delayed reflection from near end Groove 375.3 1.5

    19. Delayed reflection from near end Groove 162.5 1.0

    20. Direct reflection from near end Groove 125 0.5

    PROBING FROM FREE END SIDE:

    SL .

    No.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (Div.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end. 2390 9.6

    2. Delayed reflection from journal fillet 2376.5 9.5

    3. Delayed reflection from Wheel seat outer fillet 2294 9.2

    4. Direct reflection from journal fillet 2229 8.9

    5. Direct reflection from Wheel seat outer fillet 2125 8.5

    6. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1593 mm from probing end

    1917 7.7

    7. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1593 mm from probing end

    1771 7.1

    8. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 1679 6.7

    9. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1593 mm from probing end

    1593 6.4

    10. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 1532 6.1

    11. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    998 mm from probing end

    1348 5.4

    12. Direct reflection from Gear seat fillet 1353 5.4

  • Page 53 of 75

    13. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    998 mm from probing end

    1190.5 4.8

    14. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    998 mm from probing end

    998 4.0

    15. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 778 3.1

    16. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 633 2.5

    17. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 456 1.8

    18. Delayed reflection from near end Groove 375.3 1.5

    19. Delayed reflection from near end Groove 162.5 1.0

    20. Direct reflection from near end Groove 125 0.5

  • Page 54 of 75

    (B) NEAR END LOW ANGLE SCANNING 1 Main Scale Div. = 100 mm

    (Compressive Wave)

    Probe : 15/20mm, 2.5 MHz

    PROBING FROM BOTH ENDS:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.

    (Wedge : 15, Central beam at 30 mm from edge)

    472 4.7

    (C) HIGH ANGLE SCANNING: 1 Main Scale Div. = 50 mm (Shear wave)

    Probe: 20/25mm. , 2.5 MHz

    PROBING FROM BOTH ENDS:

    S. NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (div.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet.(Wedge :

    37.5 having dia of curvature 176mm or more, Stand

    off distance 134 mm from wheel seat inner fillet.)

    224 4.5

  • Page 55 of 75

    Annexure ‘B’

    (D) Trace Delay Scanning: 1 main scale div. = 50 mm (compressive wave)

    Probe: 15/20 mm, 2.5 MHz

    PROBING FROM GEAR END SIDE:

    (0-500) mm

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 456 9.1

    2. Delayed reflection from near end groove 375.3 7.5

    3. Delayed reflection from near end groove 162.5 3.2

    4. Direct reflection from near end groove 125 2.5

    (500 mm- 1000) mm

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 278 5.5

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 133 2.7

    (1000mm – 1500) mm

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1417 mm from probing end

    417 8.3

    2. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 393 7.9

    3. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 246 5.9

    4. Direct reflection from Gear seat fillet 67 1.3

  • Page 56 of 75

    (1500 – 2000) mm

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1587 mm from probing end

    411 8.2

    2. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1417mm from probing end

    267 5.3

    3. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1587 mm from probing end

    265 5.3

    4. Delayed reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1417mm from probing end

    109.5 2.2

    5. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    1587mm from probing end

    87 1.7

    (2000 – 2500) mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end 390 7.8

    2. Delayed reflection from journal fillet 376.5 7.5

    3. Delayed reflection from wheal seat outer fillet 294 5.9

    4. Direct reflection from journal fillet 229 4.6

    5. Direct reflection from wheal seat outer fillet 125 2.5

  • Page 57 of 75

    PROBING FROM FREE END SIDE:

    (0 - 500) mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 456 9.1

    2. Delayed reflection from near end groove 375.3 7.5

    3. Delayed reflection from near end groove 162.5 3.2

    4. Direct reflection from near end groove 125 2.5

    (500 - 1000) mm:

    S. NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from a fillet at a distance of

    998 mm from probing end

    498 9.9

    2. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 278 5.6

    3. Delayed reflection from wheel seat inner fillet 133 2.7

    (1000 – 1500) mm:

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from gear seat fillet 353 7.0

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    998 mm from probing end

    348 7.0

    3. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    998 mm from probing end

    190.5 3.8

  • Page 58 of 75

    (1500 – 2000) mm :

    S.

    NO.

    Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1593 mm from probing end

    417 8.3

    2. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1593 mm from probing end

    271 5.4

    3. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 179 3.6

    4. Delayed reflection from fillet at a distance of

    1593 mm from probing end

    93 1.9

    5. Delayed reflection from Gear seat fillet 32 0.6

    (2000 – 2500) mm:

    S.NO. Details Distance

    (mm)

    Signal

    (divn.)

    1. Direct reflection from axle end 390 7.8

    2. Delayed reflection from journal fillet 376.5 7.5

    3. Delayed reflection from Wheel seat outer fillet 294 5.9

    4. Direct reflection from journal fillet 229 4.6

    5. Direct reflection from Wheel seat outer fillet 125 2.5

  • Page 59 of 75

  • Page 60 of 75

  • Page 61 of 75

  • Page 62 of 75

    Testing Procedure and Equipment used for Ultrasonic testing of the following Tie Tamping Machine axles in service:

    1. CSM SATELLITE Or Driving Bogie axle to CPOH Drg. No. C-1411

    CSM

    2. Driving axle DUOMATIC to IRTMTC Drg. No. D-1402 DUO-R1

    3. Driving axle front of Unimat to CPOH Drg. No. UNI-1402

    4. Driving axle Rear of Unimat to CPOH Drg. No. UNI-1401

    5. Running axle CSM to IRTMTC Drg. No. C-1406 CSM

    Equipment and accessories recommended:

    Equipment : Any Ultrasonic Flaw Detector approved by RDSO, Lucknow (specn. No.M&C/NDT/104/2000).

    Accessories:

    Probes and Wedges:

    Far – end Scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia Of lead zirconate titanate or similar crystal. Low Angle Scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 15/20 mm dia Of lead zirconate titanate crystal with Perspex wedge 17.5°. High Angle Scanning : Normal probe of 2.5 MHz, 20/25 mm dia Of lead zirconate titanate crystal with Perspex wedge 37°, 140 mm Diameter of curvature for scanning wheel seat inner filler both for Free End and Gear End side.

    Couplant : A suitable couplant like soft grease or Axle Oil (medium) shall

    be used.

    Calibration Bar : Round bars 50 mmx500 mm long and 50mm x 182mm

    long are applicable. The round bars shall confirm to designation 45C8 of IS 1875 1992, rolled/forged and normalised. The grain size shall be ASTM 5 or finer when determined according to ASTM E – 19-39 T. Testing Procedure : Far End Scanning : This technique shall be used for testing the full length

    of the axle. The time scale shall be calibrated to 250 mm per main scale division of compression wave. The probe shall be placed on the cleaned axle end face with suitable couplant. The probe shall be given slight rotary movement for proper acoustic coupling. Some stray signals may appear near the initial echo due t