code 220 gsfc facilities master planning – a 2014 perspective date: march 19, 2015 presented by:...
TRANSCRIPT
Code 220GSFC Facilities Master Planning – A 2014 PerspectiveDate: March 19, 2015Presented by: Xzavior Hill
POC: Rick [email protected]
www.nasa.gov
Agenda
Agency Perspective
Goddard at a Glance
Master Planning-Facility Sustainability
2002 Master Plan - A Campus Framework: The Idea of Consolidation
Budget Impact and Response
2
Facility Master Planning from an Agency Perspective
3
Strategic TacticalUS Aerospace
Policy
Strategic Planning
Program Strategies
Mission Support
Strategies
Budgeting
Program Execution
Capital Investment
Program Plan
Program Alignment
NASA Center Master Plans similarly stretch the term.
Facilities Strategy
Agency Master Planning is far broader than common usage of the term master plan
Facility History
4
Key Challenge - Facility Risk: Share of NASA facilities assets under 40 years old
As asset ages rise and requirements evolve, NASA must renew the assets our programs need
Goddard at a Glance
5
Mission Comparison: Goddard/USAF
6Without going through Goddard!
You can’t go here… You can’t provide Air Power…
Without providing facilities!
GSFC Facilities Master Planning – Facility Suitability
• For the past two decades Goddard's main facilities challenges have been:
• Quality or Condition: Occupant requirements have risen and facilities readiness has declined with age
• Configuration: Like activities are not well distributed across a site
• Quantity or Capacity: Certain activities (such as launch at Wallops) have grown, others have dwindled
• In response to these challenges, GSFC developed aggressive, reasonably coherent Center Master plans.
7
2002 Master Plan - A Campus Framework: The Idea of Consolidation
8
Configuration
Strengthen adjacencies amongst activities Put like functions together
Draw the workforce closer together Condense the sight
Create places to work better with off-site partners Bring partners on or near the CenterMake divested assets available
ConditionCore competencies: Earth science, Space Science, science enabling technologies State-of-the-art Facilities
Program/project management & Institutional Support Industry Standard Facilities
CapacityOver 20 years the center projects a reduction of about 25% in workforce. Right size the Facilities
Optimize the Resources Designate some assets for partners
9
Earth Science
SpaceScience
Engineering
Prog./Proj. Mgmt.
Planning Principle: Create functional “neighborhoods” to improve performance and strengthen linkages
2002 Master Plan - A Campus Framework: The Idea of Consolidation
10
2002 Master Plan – Progress: Science and Program / Project Management re-location
BUILD NEW
RESTORE
DEMOLISH
Building 2 Demolition
New Flight Projects Bldg
Building 34 Recently Completed
Building 16 Demolition (Imminent)
11
2002 Master Plan – Progress: Institutional Re-location
BUILD NEW
RESTORE
DEMOLISH
Building 26 Restoration
New Logistics Facility
Building 16 Demolition (Imminent)
2010 Master Plan - Budget Impact
12
• Budget projections about 1/3 of planned values
• About 60% of the plan is no longer affordable
• Next 20 years will only enable first 5-7 years of 2010 plan
Budget Impact Response
13
• Center Funded Program Validation• Lines of Business Review• Reliability Centered Maintenance• Energy Reduction actions
• Interruption/Curtailment events• Teleworking• Controls Based Maintenance
• M.Y. & ROI programs used to recapitalize