• COBY HOOGKAMPPROJECT COORDINATION

• FOLKERT KUIPERSINTERREG COORDINATION

• ALBERT RUITERCONTROLLER FINANCIAL EXPERT

• IMAN HAMDOUNAPROJECT ASSISTENT

• ANNE DE VRIESPROJECTMANAGER

Subject Presentator

• INTRODUCTION

• PROJECT EWM

• CHANCES/CHALLENGES

• STRONG REGIONAL COHESION IN WASTE ACTIVITIES

• PROVINCE ORGANIZED MAIN PLAYERS WASTE FIELD

• FRISIAN WASTE ALLIANCE

PARTNERS IN THE FRISIAN WASTE ALLIANCE

AFVALSTURING FRYSLÂN NV

• MIX OF GOVERNMENT/COMPANIE

•ALL WASTE ACTIVITIES

VAN DER WIEL HOLDING BV

• METHANE RECOVERY

• INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

CARTESIUS INSTITUUT

• UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE

• SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

PROVENCE FRYSLAN

• ORGANISATION/COORDINATION

Directie

Welvaart en WelzijnRuimte, Infra-

structuur en WaterProvinciale Waterstaat

Landelijk Gebieden Milieu

Bedrijfsbureau

Cultuur, Taalen Onderwijs

Economie, Recr. & Toerisme

Zorg en Welzijn

Bedrijfsbureau

Beleidsontw.& Milieu

Bodem

LandelijkGebied

Milieuprojecten

Milieutoezicht

Bedrijfsbureau

Erfgoed, Wonen & Vernieuwing

Verkeer &Vervoer

Water

Bedrijfsbureau

Wegen

Vaarwegen

Vastgoed &Geo-informatie

Bruggen & Sluizen

District Dokkum

DistrictGorredijk

DistrictSneek

Concern- enBestuursonderst.

Bedrijfsbureau

Archief &Bibliotheek

Beleidsinfo &Cartografie

Bestuurszaken

FacilitairBedrijf

Financ. Planning& Control

Personeel &Organisatie

Mopark

Nortrail

Hanse Network for WFD

NS Rural

Farmers forNature

North Sea BioEnergie

Water City International II

Nolimp

Urban Water Cycle

Shared Space

FLOWS

Milieuver-gunningen

Ruimtelijke Plannen

Town Net

European Waste Management

Interreg-coördinatie prov.

prov. Lead Partner

prov. partner

The Province of Fryslân: Interreg projects

1- Province of Fryslân, Regional; public authority. Leeuwarden; The Netherlands.2- Afvalsturing Friesland N.V; Public equivalent body Leeuwarden; The Netherlands.3- South East England Regional Assembly; Regional public authority. Guildford; United Kingdom.4- PartneRing Adur and Worthing Services; local puplic authority. United Kingdom.5- Surrey Country Councel; local public authority; Kingston upon Thames; United Kingdom.6- Environment Agency; National public authority Worthing; United Kingdom.7- Recycling Institute; public equivalent body Edinburgh; United Kingdom.8- Polva City Government; local public authority Polva; Estonia.9- University of Debrecen Center for Environmental Management and Policy; Public equivalent body; Debrecen; Hungary.10- Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of Polish Academy of Sciences; public equivalent body; Krakow; Poland11- Waste Disposal Company Halle-Lochau; Public eqqivalent body; Dolnitz; Germany.12- Lag Appennino Genovese; Public equivalent body; Genova; Italy.

Partners

Objectives• Main objectives:• Develop innovative solutions for waste

disposal.• Realise environmental friendly and cost

effective regional waste management systems.

• Sub objectives:• New methods to decrease the amount of

waste.• New methods to increase the precentage of

waste collected seperately and reused.• Improved more cost effective organization

structures.• Introduce new strategies on regional sale.• Co-operation between the partners of the

project.• Developing a European partnership of

regional partners.• Overcome culture barries and build up a

sustainable environment.

Main objectives:• Develop innovative solutions for waste disposal.• Realise environmental friendly and cost effective regional waste management systems.Sub objectives:• New methods to decrease the amount of waste & increase the precentage of waste collected seperately and reused.• Improved more cost effective organization structures & Introduce new strategies on regional sale.• Co-operation between the partners of the project & develop a European partnership.• Overcome culture barries and build up a sustainable environment.

Objectives

INTERREG PROJECTS

INTERREG III B (LEADPARTNER)

• NOLIMP (NORTH SEA REGIONAL LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE)

• MOPARK (MOBILITY & NATIONAL PARKS)

• SHARED SPACE (TRANSPORTATION)

• FARMERS FOR NATURE

• BIO ENERGY ( TESTING TECHNICS)

• WATERCITY INTERNATIONAL

• GROWING WASTE PRODUCTION

• DIFFERENT RULES LEAD TO DIFFERENT SOLUTION FOR DISPOSAL

• WASTE SEARCHES CHEAPEST WAYS; LANDFILLING

• TECHNOLOGICAL & ORGANISATIONAL EXPERIENC ARE NEEDED TO DEVELOP NEW SOLUTIONS

• INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION IS NEEDED FOR IMPROVEMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT .

Problem description

Objectives• Main objectives:• Develop innovative solutions for waste

disposal.• Realise environmental friendly and cost

effective regional waste management systems.

• Sub objectives:• New methods to decrease the amount of

waste.• New methods to increase the precentage of

waste collected seperately and reused.• Improved more cost effective organization

structures.• Introduce new strategies on regional sale.• Co-operation between the partners of the

project.• Developing a European partnership of

regional partners.• Overcome culture barries and build up a

sustainable environment.

Main objectives:• Develop innovative solutions for waste disposal.• Realise environmental friendly and cost effective regional waste management systems.

Sub objectives:• New methods to decrease the amount of waste & increase the precentage of waste collected seperately and reused.• Improved more cost effective organization structures & Introduce new strategies on regional sale.• Co-operation between the partners of the project & develop a European partnership.• Overcome culture barries and build up a sustainable environment.

Objectives

The four components in the project:

1- Overall Management and co-ordination:Province of Fryslân

2- Landfill and reuse: Waste Disposal Company Halle-Lochau

3- Separate collection: LAG Appennino Genovese

4- Organisation structure of Waste Management: Recycling Institute Edinburgh.

Three phases to ensure innovative improvements .

• 1- Each regoin will describe the important regional factors for the problem.

• 2- Each region will use input from the other regions to generate possible solutions for the defined problem.

• 3- Each region will work out one or two innovative solutions.

Phase 1 Each region will describe the important regional factors for the problem.

Phase 2Each region will use input from the other regions to generate possible solutions for the defined problem.

Phase 3Each region will work out one or two innovative solutions.

Three phases to ensure innovative improvements

Three phases to ensure innovative improvements .

• 1- Each regoin will describe the important regional factors for the problem.

• 2- Each region will use input from the other regions to generate possible solutions for the defined problem.

• 3- Each region will work out one or two innovative solutions.

•(FEASIBILITIES) STUDIES, APPLICATIONS;

- RECYCLING ACTIVITIES,

- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESMENT

- HANDLE PUBLIC RESISTANCE,

- IMPROVEMENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE FIELD OF 3 MAIN THEMES

- APPLICATION OF NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

-COSTS & BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO IMPROVE SEPARATE COLLECTION

- PLAN NEW RECYCLING ACTIVITIES AT LANDFILL

- DATABASE WITH REGIONAL INFORMATION

-

RESULTS

Communication• The partners will set up a

communication programme for the whole project.

• The results will be communicated between the partners .

• The brochures and articles will inform every interested person.

• Articles in specialist journal will inform interested people.

• The website will inform the partners, interested personen and organisations.

• The main documents of the project will be translated into the language of the participating region

• Brochure• Articles• Seminars• Translation• Annual meetings• Excurions• Reports• Newsletter• Website

Communication

Problem description• High amount of production and

consumption lead to growing waste production in all European countries.

• Waste is disposed of by landfilling in most European countries.

• The rules in European countries differ, some waste companies choose acheap solutions which not always friendly for the disposal.

• Technological and organisational experiences is needed to develop and find new solutions of waste management.

Contribution to the objectives of the Interreg IIIC Programme

• Exchange about waste disposal .

• Plans for innovation on the issues of landfill and reuse.

• Separate collection and cost effective organisations structures for management.

• Co-operation among regions from different Interreg zones on waste management.

• Website that provides the partners the opportunity to collect information about development.

• Exchange about waste disposal .• Plans for innovation on the issues of landfill and reuse.• Separate collection and Cost effective organisations structures for management.• Co-operation among regions from different Interreg zones on waste management.

Contribution to the objectives of the Interreg IIIC Programme

Coordination and management

• Asteering Group: Consists of two members of each partner.

• The lead partner is Fryslân:

• Wil provide aproject secretariat, project manager, project officer and financial controller.

• Is responsible for the overall project activities.

• Wil stimulate the partners to keep in contact with each other.

• Lead partner contacts wil cover all project activities and stimulate the project progress.

Province Fryslan (lead partner) provides:

• project secretariat, project manager, project officer and financial controller.

• Is responsible for the overall project activities.

• stimulates the partners to keep in contact with each other & the project progress.

Co-ordination and management

Budget and duration

The total budget:€ 1.377.272,00

ERDF funding : €

843.654,00

National funding: € 533.618,00

Budget and duration

Management Organisation € 289.210Landfill & Reuse € 299.452Separate Collection € 457.184Waste management € 331.426

Total budget: € 1.377.272

ERDF funding; € 843.654

National funding: € 533.618,-

The project starts in July 2004,& finish in April 2007.

Budget and duration

The total budget:€ 1.377.272,00

ERDF funding : €

843.654,00

National funding: € 533.618,00

Budget for each component

1- Overall Management and co-ordination:Province of Fryslân € 290.000 (21 %)

2- Landfill and reuse: Waste Disposal Company Halle-Lochau€ 300.000 (21,7%)

3- Separate collection: LAG Appennino Genovese€ 457.000 (33,2%)

4- Organisation structure of Waste Management: Recycling Institute Edinburgh.

€ 330.000 (33,2%)

CHANCES/CHALLANGES

• EUROPEAN POLICY/RULES

• DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS

• INTERREG IV

• EU RULES LANDFILL DIRECTIVE

• LANDFILL BAN (FOR RECYCLING WASTE)

• TAX LANDFILLING

EUROPEAN POLICY/RULES

• Is 34% of EU budget

• About 50-50 between current and new Member States

• More than ¾ of the budget for regions and Member States lagging behind in development

• important subjects • innovation and the knowledge society• environment and risk prevention

COHESION REPORT

Norwich

SneekEmden

Stockton-on-Tees/Middlesbrough

Göteborg

Malmö

Leeuwarden

Skien/Porsgrunn

Odense

COHESION REPORT EU (February 2004)

•presents proposals for reformed cohesion policy after 2007

• EU budget 2000-2006 € 108.5 billion PER YEAR for EU25, € 37 billion for structural actions

•Financial Perspectives 2007-2013€ 146.4 billion PER YEAR for EU27, € 48 billion for structural actions

Water City International – City of Leeuwarden

WCI-I WCI-II investments now

Euro 150.000 2.2 miljoen 17 miljoen

the snowball-effect

INTERREG III C EWM

• FINISHED APRIL 2007

RESULTS • FEASIBILITY STUDIES• PLANS INNOVATIVE ACTION &PILOTS

INTERREG IV

• PREPARATION OF PROJECTS 2007

• APPLICATION ROUND starts 1/1/2008

UNITED WE SOLVE WASTE PROBLEMS