CMPT 880/890Writing labs

OutlineIdentifying problems in paragraphsArgumentsWhat should be an argument and what shouldn’t?ClaimsReasonsEvidence

Finding problems in writingThe other key aspect of this thesis is availability. This is defined as how accessible an individual is. It is in many ways the other half of the natural interaction of awareness. While others are aware of you, you are available to them. In this context, it is the level of social interaction that you are capable of or willing to be a part of. Whereas awareness is the interpretation by others of data about you, availability relates more to the raw data (embodiment, location, activity) about you as an individual. Where awareness is the metaphor for the social status you provide, availability contains the semantic information that you present.

Finding problems in writingRead the paragraph and think about:

what is the topic of the paragraph?what is the argument?

what is the writer trying to accomplish in the paragraphinform or convince?if only inform, then why?

is the main point stated early? the ‘topic sentence’

do the sentences support the paragraph’s argument?what do the sentences themselves say?

and what expectations do they implicitly introduce?

Finding problems in writingThis change will allow us to better leverage our talent

base in an area where developmental roles are under way and strategically focuses us toward the upcoming Business System transition where Systems literacy and accuracy will be essential to maintain and to further improve service levels to our customer base going forward.

Finding problems in writingWithin our society, it has been shown that there is an individual. An individual with individual thoughts and actions. But who determines whether or not he is correct in their choices? Are our thoughts brain washed through the media with it’s hellish ideas or our closet friends that try to direct us in the right direction? No one may ever know what is right or wrong. So what is ethical relativism anyway? And who is behind all of the madness of ethical relativism? It has been said that relativist’s are believed to think that relativism is true. Ethical Relativism is of a mind to say that whatever one’s culture says is right is the right thing for him or her to do. One might conclude that the world we human beings live in is not without a variety of many different and diverse cultures with different cultural practices and hence different moralities. Studying ethics from a philosophical point of view, ethical relativist’s might conclude that your wasting your time just like philosophers have always wasted they’re time.

Finding problems in writingIn order to simplify the process of designing augmented interactions for WIMP interfaces, we present a conceptual framework that is based on a high-level view of a user’s interaction with a GUI. The framework has at its core the idea of an interaction, which we define as a combination of an object in the interface with one or more actions, each of which have a characteristic degree of freedom. Interactions are undertaken in service of a user task, and are supported by input mechanisms that provide the actual input data. In the following sections we describe each part of the framework in more detail, starting with the idea of an interaction.

Finding problems in writingIn June immense schools of small, silvery fish called capelin enter the hundreds of bays that dot the eastern coast of Newfoundland to perform a fascinating ceremony. The males and females separately approach the gravel beaches and are borne ashore in waves so laden with their bodies as to be virtual walls of fish. There, on the gravel, the females lay their eggs and the males fertilize them; then most of the fish die.

Arguments

What is an argument?

What is an argument?An attempt to convince the reader of somethingYou have ‘something to say,’ a point to makeMore than just statements of factsArguments are based on making claims

“Recency-based caches have lower fault rates than frequency-based caches”

“Halos help users understand the locations of off-screen objects of interest”

“Interpreting information visualizations is a substantial problem for colour-blind users”

A conversation with a skeptic“Recency-based caches have lower fault rates than

frequency-based caches”Oh really? Why do you say that?

“Halos help users understand the locations of off-screen objects of interest”Is that so? Convince me.

“Interpreting information visualizations is a substantial problem for colour-blind users”I don’t believe you.

The structure of an argumentClaimReason(s) for the claimEvidence for the reasons

It is important to understand the argument before you write the paragraph / paper!

Write the argument out in point form first!

Questions (for the writer)What is my claim?What reasons support my claim?What evidence supports my reasons?Do I acknowledge and respond to likely objections?What principle makes my reasons relevant to my claim?

What is a claim?A sentence that asserts something is true or false

e.g., “Lurkers are a drain on the resources of an online community”

The main claim of your paper is the claim that is supported by the entire papere.g., “Auditory cues reduce the time it takes users to

locate the mouse cursor”

What is a reason?A sentence supporting a claim

Answers the question “why?” after a claim“Awareness is an important design principle for distributed

groupware” [claim]“Why?”“Because awareness allows more efficient communication”

So, a reason is also a claim!and may be supported by another reasonbut at some point, the support will be evidence

What is evidence?Sentences that state facts, findings, or resultsThe actual dataSomething that can be measured or seen

“Fisheye views provide a better sense of context than traditional zoom views”

“Because they provide visibility of the entire dataset at all times”

“Here is a demonstration showing that they provide better visibility”

Sort out the partsTV violence can have harmful effects on childrenBecause those exposed to lots of TV tend to adopt the

values of what they seeConstant exposure to violent images makes children

unable to distinguish fantasy from realitySmith (1997) found that children ages 5-7 who

watched more than three hours of violent TV per day were 25% more likely to say that what they saw on television was really happening.

Responding to objections“But what about X?”You must anticipate your readers’ objections and

address them“I have solved problem Y”

“But is your solution feasible?”“But will your solution cost more money?”“But will it work in all cases?”“But will it cause more problems than it solves?”“But is it better than the current method of solving Y?”

Connecting reasons to claims“Health-care costs will continue to rise in the northern

hemisphere because of global warming”Huh? How does global warming have anything to do

with health-care costs?Your reason doesn’t support your claim

Warrants provide a general principle that establishes the relevance of your reason to your claim“When there are fewer hard freezes in a region,

subtropical insects and therefore subtropical diseases become more common, and these are very expensive to treat”

WarrantsThis general circumstance leads to This general consequence

This specific circumstance lets us infer This specific consequence

Global warming is reducing the number of hard freezes in the northern hemisphere

Health-care costs will rise in the northern hemisphere

Fewer hard freezes More expensive sub-tropical diseases

This is a good instance of thisThis is a good instance of this

Are warrants always necessary?Not alwaysIt depends on what your readers are likely to acceptMore controversial claims may need more reasons

Well-accepted claims may need no reasons“Everyone knows that …”

Reasons that are not obvious need warrants

The point is to think about your reader

ExampleAlthough tightly-coupled interaction is common in the real world, the precision timing and exact movements required for this degree of coordination are extremely difficult to achieve in distributed groupware. This is largely because of the presence of network delay: delay makes it difficult for people to coordinate their actions, because the visual information that shows what other people are doing arrives late, and the shared action quickly become disorganized. The interdependency and the fine granularity of tightly-coupled interaction makes this type of coordination sensitive to latencies as low as 100-200ms [2], which are still frequently seen in Internet applications.

ExerciseWrite a claim, reason(s), warrants, and evidence

about which programming language should be taught in first-year computer science classes

Include (for practice) all the elementsMake up the evidence (but make it sound believable)