climate related institutional context … · dan perlindungan anak ... woc world ocean conference....
TRANSCRIPT
CLIMATE RELATED INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT ANALYSIS OFBANGKA BELITUNG ISLAND PROVINCE
Center for Climate Finance and Multilateral PolicyFiscal Policy Agency
Ministry of Finance Republic of Indonesia2016
FISCAL POLICY AGENCYMINISTRY OF FINANCE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
CLIMATE RELATEDINSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT ANALYSIS
BANGKA BELITUNG ISLAND PROVINCE OF INDONESIA
i
CLIMATE RELATEDINSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT ANALYSIS
BANGKA BELITUNG ISLAND PROVINCE OF INDONESIA
FISCAL POLICY AGENCYMINISTRY OF FINANCE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
iii
Table of Contents 1List Of Abbreviations 2
1 INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS........................................................................... 41.1 National Level CC Institutional Arrangements ................................... 4
1.1.1 National Level Institutions for CC Actions .............................. 41.1.2 Laws and Regulations Determining Local Government CC
Arrangements ........................................................................ 51.2 Sub-national Level CC Institutional Arrangement in Babel Province . 6
1.2.1 CC Mitigation in Babel Province ............................................. 61.2.2 CC Adaptation in Babel Province ............................................ 71.2.3 Other Institutions ................................................................... 8
1.3 CC Policy Coordination and Reporting in Babel Province ................... 81.3.1 Sub-national CC Coordination and Reporting ........................ 8
1.4 Sub-national Government Capacity Assessment ............................. 111.5 Institutional Findings ....................................................................... 12
2 INSTITUTIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... 14
Annex 1: Institutional Chapter Tables ............................................................... 15Annex 2: Capacity Assessment Methodology and Results ............................... 20Annex 3. Additional Information on planning and budgeting process ............. 28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iv
BAKORLUH Extension Coordinating Agency/ Badan Koordinator Penyuluhan
BAPPEDA Regional Development Planning Agency/ Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah
BAPPENAS National Development Planning Agency/ Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional
BIG Geospatial Information Agency/ Badan Informasi GeospasialBLHD Regional Environmental Agency/ Badan Lingkungan Hidup
DaerahBKF Fiscal Policy Agency/ Badan Kebijakan FiskalBKKBD PPPA Agency of Demographic and Family Planning Women
Empowerment and Children Protection / Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Daerah – Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak
BKP Food Security Agency/ Badan Ketahanan PanganBMKG Meteorology, Climate & Geophysics Agency/ Badan
Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan GeofisikaBNPB National Disaster Agency/ Badan Penanggulangan Bencana
NasionalBPBD Regional Disaster Agency/ Badan Penaggulangan Bencana
DaerahBPS Statistic Agency/ Badan Pusat StatistikBPPT Agency for Assesment & Application/ Badan Pengkajian dan
Penerapan TeknologiCC Climate ChangeCCPL Climate Change Programme LoanCTI Coral Triangle InitiativeCPEIR Climate Public Expenditure and Institution ReviewDG Directorate General/ Direktorat Jenderal
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
v
DKP Marine and Fishery Office/ Dinas Kelautan dan PerikananDNPI National Council for Climate Change/ Dewan Nasional
Perubahan IklimDPRD Sub-national Parliament/ Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat DaerahGHG Greenhouse GasGovR Governor RegulationHKTI National Farmer Group/ Himpunan Kerukunan Tani IndonesiaICCTF Indonesia Climate Change Trust FundIGIF Indonesia Green Investment FundKemenko PMK Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Culture/
Kementerian Koordinator Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan
KLHK Ministry of Environment and Forestry/ Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan
LAKIP Government Accountability and Performance/ Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
LAPAN The National Institute of Aeronautics and Space/ Lembaga Antariksa dan Penerbangan Nasional
LIPI Indonesian Institute of Sciences/ Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
LSM Civil Society Organization/ Lembaga Swadaya MasyarakatMDG Millennium Development GoalMOHA Ministry of Home Affairs/ Kementerian Dalam NegeriMOF Ministry of Finance/ Kementerian KeuanganPERTAMINA State oil and Gas Company/ Perusahaan Tambang Minyak
NegaraPLN State Electricity Enterprise/ Perusahaan Listrik NegaraPKPPIM Center for Climate Finance and Multilateral Policy / Pusat
Kebijakan Pembiayaan Perubahan Iklim dan MultilateralPPGL The Marine Geological Institute/ Pusat Penelitian dan
Pengembangan Geologi KelautanPR Presidential Regulation/ Peraturan PresidenProvR Provincial RegulationRAD-GRK Regional Action Plan for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reduction/ Rencana Aksi Daerah Penurunan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca
vi
RAN-API National Action Plan Climate Change Adaptation/ Rencana Aksi Nasional Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim
RAN-GRK National Action Plan for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction/ Rencana Aksi Nasional Penurunan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca
RPJM Medium Development Plant/ Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah
REDD+ Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation
SIDIK Vulnerability Index Informastion System/ Sistem Informasi Data Indeks Kerentanan
UNDP United Nation Development ProgrammeWALHI Friends of the Earth/ Wahana Lingkungan HidupWOC World Ocean Conference
11INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
2
3
1.1 NationalLevelCCInstitutionalArrangements
1.1.1 NationalLevelInstitutionsforCCActions
The National Council for Climate Change (DNPI) was assigned the coordinating role in delivering CC actions both for mitigation and adaptation under PR 46/2008. In addition, the REDD+ Agency (BP REDD+) was to ensure effective implementation of the mitigation actions plan.
The new government administration in 2014 has changed some of the structures governing CC. The environment and forestry sectors which were formerly separated, have been merged into a new Ministry of Environment and Forestry (PR 16/2015), and a new Directorate General (DG) of Climate Change Control created. The DNPI and REDD+ Agency were dissolved and incorporated under the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, specifically under the DG of Climate Change Control.
The following section maps the institutions in charge of reporting, coordinating, facilitating, implementing, or supporting the CC mitigation and adaptation actions. a. Reporting Institutions The Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs is responsible
to coordinate mitigation actions and to report to the President (RAN-GRK PR 61/2011). The Deputyship of Energy, Natural Resources and Environment is designated as the implementing entity (PR 08/2015).
InstitutionalAnalysis1
4
For CC adaptation action plans, the RAN-API designates the Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Culture1 to coordinate and report to the President. The PR 09/2015 deputes the deputyships of social vulnerability and disaster impact; poverty reduction and social protection; health enhancement; and empowerment of people, village, and areas as the implementing divisions.
The Secretary of each Coordinating Ministry should ensure the timeliness and quality of reporting to the President.
b. Facilitating and Coordinating Institutions The Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas)
and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry2 are responsible for facilitating both mitigation and adaptation actions under the RAN-GRK and RAN-API. The MOHA is in charge of facilitating both sets of actions at the sub-national level, i.e in provinces and districts. The Meteorology, Climate & Geophysics Agency (BMKG) also has a key support role in providing and facilitating CC data.
Within Bappenas, the Deputyship of Natural Resources and Environment is in charge of CC (PR 82/2007). And in the new Ministry of Environment and Forestry, PR 16/2015 has designated the Director General (DG) of Climate Change Control to ensure that the former roles of the DNPI and REDD+ are incorporated and applied on the ground.
There is no explicit function for CC or even for environmental issues stipulated in the PR 11/2015 on the organisation of MOHA. Only MOHA’s disaster management function is related directly to the CC adaptation actions. Other sub-departments of MOHA are in charge of coordinating sub-national governments in areas potentially relevant to CC,
1 The new name to replace the Coordinating Ministry for People’s Welfare of the former administration.
2 It still refers to the RAN-API which is replaced by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry under the new administration.
5
e.g. the DG of Spatial Administration Development, DG of Regional Development, and DG of Village Government.
c. Implementing Institutions A number of national institutions are designated as
implementing institutions in the RAN-GRK and the RAN-API (Annex 1, Table A3.3).
The Ministry of Finance (MOF) plays an important role as a supporting institutions for both mitigation and adaptation actions. It facilitates, supports and manages a range of financing instruments for CC mitigation and adaptation actions. The MOF has designated the Fiscal Policy Agency (BKF), through the Centre for Climate Finance and Multilateral Policy, to carry out research on financial schemes for climate change actions. The MoF has managed the World Bank/Japan/AFD Climate Change Programme Loan (CCPL), the DFID/AusAid Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF), the DFID/AFD Indonesia Green Investment Fund (IGIF) and some bilateral project support.
Other supporting institutions for adaptation actions, as stated in the RAN-API, are the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), the Agency for Assessment & Application of Technology (BPPT), the Geospatial Information agency (BIG), the National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN), and the Marine Geological Institute (PPGL).
1.1.2 Laws and Regulations Determining Local Government CCArrangements
The government administration system in Indonesia is heavily guided by Laws and regulations. Historically, every action has to be underpinned by a law or regulation. This has the benefit of providing certainty to those who work within the system in that everything an official does can be justified by such laws and regulation. But on the other hand, it can also stifle
6
initiative, innovation and risk taking. And this is likely to affect the behaviour of those in the system, making them more risk averse. However, Law 23/2014 (which replaced Law 32/2004) has recently introduced a clause which allows for more flexibility for sub-national governments. Chapter 21 of the Law stipulates that sub-national governments can undertake innovations where they enhance efficiency and productivity of basic service provision. Central government will monitor the performance of this innovation. Law 23/2014 on regional government constitutes the mother law for regulations which specify sub-national government functions. The national regulations that guide sub-national governments in respect of development planning and financial management, are shown in Annex 1, Table A3.1.
Law 23/2014 provides for sub-national government management across a wide range of devolved functions, some of which can potentially relate to CC, i.e. for public works and spatial management, water resources, waste treatment, drainage, settlements, buildings and environment; housing and residential areas; tranquility and protection of society, disaster management and social security, women empowerment and children protection, children and gender data systems, food security, environmental issues, population and family planning, marine and fishery, tourism, agriculture, forestry, energy and mineral resources, and industry.
At the ministerial level, there are a number of climate-relevant regulations (Annex 1, Table A3.2).
The Minister of Home Affairs has the responsibility to provide guidance for sub-national government annual and medium-term planning. The MOHA regulation 23/2013 which guides the preparation of the 2014 annual sub-national plans, has a specific instruction setting targets for GHG emissions reduction and the prevention of deforestation in sub-national annual plans.
7
Its guidance in 2014 also included emissions reductions and inventory. Given that the RAN-API was only issued in February 2014, the MOHA has not yet provided guidelines on what sub-national governments should do in relation to adaptation. Under its ministerial regulation 27/2014, MOHA has provided guidance only for sub-national governments to address CC impacts on coastal areas and small islands through appropriate protection and management measures.
1.2 Sub-nationalLevelCCInstitutionalArrangementinBabelProvince
1.2.1 CCMitigationinBabelProvince
Following the mandate of the national RAN-GRK (2011) for sub-national governments to establish GHG reduction action plans, the Babel Province Governor authorised the preparation of a Babel province action plan (RAD-GRK) in 2012 (GR No. 36/2012). The Babel RAD-GRK was formulated by a working group of government unit representatives selected and led by the regional development planning office (Bappeda) under the coordination of the Province Secretary. The resultant RAD-GRK was approved by the Governor and issued on 23 November 2012. The target sectors to reduce GHG emissions are the same six as in the RAN-GRK, namely agriculture, plantation, and livestock; forestry; energy; transportation; industry; and waste treatment. The RAD-GRK states that action plans should be implemented both at the province and in the districts. In practice, only the provincial RAD-GRK exists.
The Babel RAD-GRK has identified a number of organisations that are relevant for implementing GHG emissions reductions. It identifies institutions at provincial and district levels, both state and non-state in the six sectors. Annex 1, Table A3.4 lists the provincial units and non-state institutions that are planned to be involved in accordance with the RAD-GRK.
8
The RAD-GRK states that climate relevant government districts units should implement mitigation actions at the district level. It also states that the districts units should report to the Provincial Bappeda. Mitigation actions should be applied concurrently both in the province and districts. However, the RAD-GRK doesn’t specify a district government unit responsible for district reporting on mitigation. This introduces a lack of clarity in the districts as to their involvement in implementing the mitigation actions. Visits by the CPEIR team to two pilot districts confirmed that the districts units have a low level of understanding of mitigation actions and processes.
There are a number of weaknesses in the current Babel Province RAD-GRK. There is particular confusion over “mandatory” and “elective” mandates. In Law 23/2014, “mandatory” functions refer to functions of the Government which should be carried out by all sub-national governments. “Elective” functions relates to functions which are not compulsory to be carried out by sub-national governments but which can be carried out where appropriate to the circumstances of a province or district. See Fig A3.1 in Annex 1.
RAD-GRK categorises health and food security as elective functions, whereas Law 23/2014 on sub-national government stipulates those functions as mandatory. On the other hand, marine and fishery, agriculture, forestry, energy and mineral resources, industry, and trade functions are classified by RAD-GRK as mandatory, which are supposed to be elective functions based on the same law. Accordingly, the RAD-GRK does not provide clear instruction and direction to the provincial and district units to integrate CC actions as part of their tasks.
Four sub-national units are identified in the RAD-GRK, namely the Health Office, Marine and Fishery Office, Food Security Agency, and Statistics Agency (BPS), but without detailed explanation of the roles and responsibilities. Further, the Health office appears not to be relevant to reducing GHG emissions.
9
The Marine and Fishery Office (DKP) is mandated to carry out to mitigation actions in four non-related sectors, namely agriculture, forestry, transportation, and energy. Again there is no detail on specific roles and modus operandi. The Food Security Agency (BKP) is also delegated to reduce GHGs in the agriculture and forestry sectors. But the Food Security Agency (BKP) does not have tasks which relate to mitigation actions.
The RAD-GRK mandates the BPS provincial office to carry out mitigation actions though its role and function is not clear. It could play a service function role in providing GHG mitigation data though this role is designated to the Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) at the national level.
1.2.2 CCAdaptationinBabelProvince
The national RAN-API (2014) identified six provinces and nine districts/cities to pilot the preparation of provincial adaptation action plans (RAD-API) not including any in Babel Province. But the RAN-API also encouraged the other regions to develop their own adaptation strategies (RAD-API) in coordination with the MOHA.
Sub-national adaptation action plans should be built on an assessment of regional vulnerability, potential risks, and own resilience enhancement. This has not yet been done in Babel Province. CC adaptive programmes should embrace vulnerable groups including women and poor people. Moreover, regions such as Babel Province with its over-reliance on a single commodity (tin) face risks which could obstruct community resilience and the ability to develop alternative livelihoods against future CC shocks. So far, there have been no steps taken on preparing a RAD-API for Babel Province. However, there are a number of provincial regulations which could be used to support the preparation of a RAD-API and the enhancing of CC adaptive capacity. For more details, see Annex 1, Table A3.7.
10
With regard to adaptation to CC, since there is no specific regulation in Babel, the national RAN-API could be the starting point to identify which regional units are relevant to CC adaptation. Annex 1,Table A3.5 lists the sub-national units that are deemed relevant to enhancing resilience on adaptation issues with reference to RAN-API.
1.2.3 OtherInstitutions
Other institutions with potentially important roles to play in managing CC in Babel Province are listed below.1. Sub-national parliament. The sub-national parliaments have a key role in provincial
planning including approvals of the Medium-term Development Plans, Annual Government Action Plans, and annual budgets. It is important to have the provincial parliament involved in promoting CC actions.
2. Civil society organization. There are only a few CSOs in Babel and none of them is
working directly on the CC issue. Climate relevant CSOs are Friends of the Earth (Walhi), the Watershed Forum, the women and children group, the Babel Farmer Group (HKTI), and an NGO that works in the tourism sector. Walhi is the most prominent NGO often quoted by the local media in raising issues on environmental damage and livelihood impact.
3. Private sector. The RAD-GRK lists various private sector groups including
palm oil and other plantation companies, mining companies, mass-transport companies, the State Owned Tin Enterprise (PT. Timah), the Babel branch of the State Electricity Enterprise (PLN) and the Pertamina (state oil and gas company).
4. Academia/university. Only the University of Bangka Belitung is listed in the RAD-
GRK. A full listing is at Annex 1, Table A3.6.
11
1.3 CCPolicyCoordinationandReportinginBabelProvince
1.3.1 Sub-nationalCCCoordinationandReporting
CC Coordination within the Province The PR 41/2007 on sub-national organisation stipulates that heads of work units are responsible to the elected Governor through the Provincial Secretary. The Provincial Secretary is the most senior bureaucrat in the provincial government. These senior positions are to some degree political in nature because the Governor can decide who fills these positions. In practice, the Provincial Secretary will change with a change of Governor. The Provincial Secretary has the main responsibility for coordinating planning, budgeting, and programmes for the province. He also represents the Governor in the context of general bureaucratic relations.
The Provincial secretariat has three assistant secretaries, each managing about thirty divisions and sub-divisions. There are a total of 101 divisions and sub-divisions under the Secretariat. The large number constitutes a considerable coordination and capacity challenge particularly in view of the staff rotation policy which is applied in the Babel Province government. In relation to CC, strengthening the knowledge and awareness and building capacity of CC of the higher level officials in the Secretariat will be necessary moving forward.
Mitigation & Adaptation Coordination
On mitigation actions, the RAD-GRK states that the RAD-GRK Secretariat located in Bappeda has the responsibility for coordinating and reporting progress on GHG emission reductions to the Governor. For CC adaptation, given its role in coordinating provincial planning and budgeting, at the strategic level the Provincial Secretariat would be the institution to coordinate the adaptation strategy and to ensure the strategy can be internalised into the provincial planning and budgeting process.
12
Bappeda plays a main role in the sub-national planning process at the operational level. The RAD-GRK delegates to Bappeda the responsibility of providing the RAD-GRK secretariat. The RAD-GRK secretariat should facilitate and coordinate the provincial units and stakeholders, recalculate GHG emissions every year, identify targets and actions to be integrated into the medium-term development plan, publish results of GHG emissions, lessons learnt and awareness of mitigation actions, and conduct evaluation and adjustment when necessary of the mitigation plan.
With regard to the implementation of the RAD-GRK, a coordination team is supposed to be formed and chaired by the Provincial Secretary to monitor the implementation of RAD-GRK. It should consist of government and non-government representatives. This team has not yet been formed. In practice, the provincial Bappeda constitutes the key institution in leading RAD-GRK actions.
There are two levels of reporting, at the sub-national level and at the national level.
Mitigation Reporting within the Province The Babel RAD-GRK states that progress reports should be submitted annually by each work unit to Bappeda3. The report should comprise problem analysis, results of emissions calculations, analysis/evaluation of the results of sector and special policies, and results of implementation.
The provincial units who should report are in Annex 1, Table A3.8. The RAD-GRK specifies the institutions in charge of implementing mitigation actions. But reporting requirements are only stipulated (in RAD-GRK Chapter 5) for the forestry sector. RAD-GRK appoints the entities to lead for the agriculture, energy, and industry sectors; these are the Agriculture Plantation Livestock Office, Mining Energy Office, and Industry Trade Office respectively. RAD-GRK does not specify an entity in charge
3 See chapter 6 Babel RAD-GRK
13
of reporting on the waste sector. In practice, the provincial environmental agency (BLHD) has been appointed by Bappeda to report on mitigation progress in the waste sector. RAD-GRK monitoring and evaluation results and progress can be included in the provincial Report of Government Accountability and Performance (LAKIP). The report should be submitted by the Governor to the MOHA, copied to the MOF.
Mitigation Reporting to Central Government The Governor should submit the provincial mitigation progress report to the MOHA, the Minister/Head of Bappenas, and to the Minister of Environment and Forestry. Monitoring and evaluation should be carried out twice a year, at the end of the third quarter and the end of the fourth quarter. The interim report, which captures progress from the first until the third quarter, is reported in the second week of October. And the final report should be submitted in the second week of January.4
The MOHA reported that only three out of five mitigation sectors have reported from Babel Province since the RAD-GRK was introduced in 2012. Reports from energy and waste comprised 2010-2012 activity reports, while the transportation sector also provided a 2012 report. The forestry and agriculture sectors of have not reported at all.
TheOwnershipIssueforMitigationinBabelProvince Ownership and strong coordination are two requirements to enable the province and district/city to work together to implement the RAD-GRK. It is not clear at this stage that high level ownership has emerged to underpin and make effective either the RAD-GRK or the RAD-API processes, both at the provincial and district level.
So far, the RAD-GRK has been heavily top-down. It raises questions about the selection of activities included in the RAD-GRK to reduce the GHG emissions. Bearing in mind the limited
4 See link secretariat-rangrk.org
14
capacity of the province to collect data and evidence needed, the districts should be given the opportunity to review and provide feedback of RAD-GRK documents that have been prepared by the province.
In order to internalise the RAD-GRK into routine activities, CC actions should be integrated into the Province Medium Term Development Plan which will be revised during 2015, as well as into annual development plans.
Adaptation Coordinating Mechanisms between Central and Local GovernmentAccording to the RAN-API, the coordination mechanism between national and regional levels is as follows5.1. The Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and
Culture6 coordinates the implementation and monitoring of the RAN-API with the involvement of Ministers and Governors, and reports on its implementation progress to the President, at least once a year.
2. Minister of National Development Planning/Head of Bappenas coordinates the evaluation and review of the integrated RAN-API, and develops guidelines for the preparation of sub-national Action Plans for CC Adaptation or RAD-API.
3. The MOHA is responsible to facilitate the preparation of the sub-national level RAD-APIs together with the Minister of National Development Planning/Head of Bappenas and the Minister of Environment & Forestry7.
4. Ministries / Institutions act according to their functions to implement RAN-API so that it can be measured, reported on and verified in co-operation with international funding. They also monitor and report the implementation results regularly to the Head of Bappenas.
5 As cited from the RAN-API page 57-58. 6 The new name to replace the Coordinating Ministry for People’s Welfare of the former
administration.7 Given the new administration, Minister of Environment has been changed to Minister of
Environment and Forestry. The RAN-API uses the old nomenclature.
15
5. Provinces are expected to develop the Provincial Action Plan for CC Adaptation or RAD-API, in accordance with local development priorities and capacity of local budget and public. The Governor submits the RAD-API to the MoHA and Head of Bappenas to be integrated into national CC adaptation actions.
TheCoordinationChallenge Coordination is a main challenge in the implementation of CC actions considering the decentralized political structure and governance system that exists in Indonesia. Effective coordination is crucial to regulate the relations between national and sub-national governments. But coordination does not necessarily provide the authority for accountability. This is a weakness in implementation in the context of a decentralised system where plans and programme are introduced and encouraged from the centre, but where the accountability mechanism depends on self-assessment at the lower levels of administration.
Coordination problems exist at all government levels. Coordination ineffectiveness is caused mostly by lack of functional clarity and leadership and a silo institutional culture. In the case of CC, CC issues only can be solved by collaboration of a number of institutions. This is particularly because CC does not have an institution dedicated solely to managing CC. Without effective leadership and clarity of tasks and mandates division among institutions, the problems are unlikely to be solved effectively.
Coordinating with and Integrating CC Actions into Village Plans and Budgets Villages also prepare development plans as a basis for preparing the village budget (Law 6/2014). The document should be prepared by involving all communities in the village through the village development forum (Village Musrenbang). Village development plans feed into the district and provincial plans. Implementation can be financed by a combination of own budget and district and province budgets.
16
The Village Musrenbang is a mechanism to establish village medium-term development plan and annual village development plan. Unlike the higher level development plans which cover a five year-period, the village medium-term plans cover a six years period.
Villages are at the forefront of encountering CC exposure and vulnerability impacted by CC. Connecting villages to the SIDIK online system which provides village level data would help them to identify needs to encounter CC impact in the future.
Awareness raising and capacity building in relation to CC will be necessary for village councils and officials. Communities involved in the village planning and budgeting process should be made aware of CC issues to plan for CC in the future and to help improve village CC resilience.
1.4 Sub-nationalGovernmentCapacityAssessment
A capacity assessment was carried out by the CPEIR to gauge the enabling environment for the implementation of CC actions in Babel; and the knowledge and awareness of the work units to respond to CC. The assessment methodology comprised three dimensions, namely points of entry at the levels of enabling environment and organisation; core issues on institutional arrangements and knowledge/awareness; and functional capacities which consist of capacities to formulate policies and strategies, engage stakeholders, and budget and implement.
A quantitative approach was used to give a ranking for the assessment, as follows. 1 - No evidence of relevant capacity2 - Anecdotal evidence capacity3 - Partially developed capacity4 - Widespread, but not comprehensive, evidence of capacity5 - Fully developed capacity
17
The assessment results indicated that the capacity of Babel Province to implement CC actions is quite low. The highest score was for the provincial Environment Agency (BLHD) which scored 4 out of 5. Bappeda, Disaster Agency and Health Office scored 3 out of 5 and the other work units scored between 1.5 to 2.4. Details of the methodology and results are in Annex 2.
Some institutions, Bappeda, BLHD and Forestry Office, have integrated CC mitigation and adaptation actions explicitly into their strategic plans. Other organisations have CC relevant programmes without them being labelled explicitly as CC. Nevertheless, knowledge and awareness still needs to be enhanced for the public servants to get the CC implementation in line with their strategic plans and acquire and preserve CC knowledge within the institution.
1.5 InstitutionalFindings
General CC Institutional Arrangements A number of factors influence the performance of the provincial government administration system and the behaviour of officials who work within it.
The government administration system in Indonesia is heavily guided by laws and regulations. Accountability mechanisms in Babel Province are not completely effective in producing good quality planning outcomes. The decentralised system means that decision making and accountability responsibilities lie mainly with the provinces and districts where technical capacities are often limited.
Bappenas, KLHK, and MOHA are institutions whose roles facilitate and coordinate the CC actions. However, at the sub-national level, the MOHA is the key institution to advise sub-national governments to implement their RAD-GRKs and establish the sub-national adaptation strategy.
MOHA capacity to provide an oversight role, in particular on CC issues, is quite weak in terms of ensuring accountability and good quality
18
reporting from the sub-national level. Accountability mechanisms in practice are very light touch if they operate at all.
Innovations such as RAD-GRK, PBB and GBS can be made more effective through strengthening supervision and accountability processes. Frequent staff rotations between work units constrain achieving depth in the development of technical capacities.
Babel Province CC Institutional Arrangements The Provincial Secretary is the key position for coordinating and monitoring according to the RAD-GRK, but in practice Bappeda plays the main role in RAD-GRK implementation.
The Babel RAD-GRK has comprehensively identified institutions to implement and report on the mitigation actions. However, changes are needed to make the RAD-GRK more internally and externally consistent. The division of functions is not consistent with the law on sub-national government. The rationales behind some of the proposed arrangements are not clear. And the RAD-GRK doesn’t clearly specify the districts units and mechanism to coordinate, monitor and implement.
The RAD-GRK in Babel Province is not currently working effectively. There have been few coordination and monitoring meetings. The CC mitigation coordination team as mandated in the RAD GRK has not been established. At least two sectors of RAD GRK have not reported.
In terms of integrating CC actions into Village plans, Law 6/2014 stipulates that villages are to play a more autonomous role in preparing their own plans and budgets. Villages are at the forefront of confronting CC exposure and vulnerability. Hence their capacity to encounter CC should be enhanced.
KLHK is building an inventory and vulnerability index data system, the SIDIK online, which contains a number of vulnerability indicators that using village-based data. Connecting villages to the SIDIK online system would help them to identify needs to encounter CC impact in the future.
19
CCCoordinationIssues In the context of CC, CC issues only can be solved by collaboration of a number of institutions. This is particularly because there is no single institution solely dedicated to managing CC. Without effective leadership and clarity of tasks and mandates among institutions, these problems are less likely to be solved.
CCCapacityAssessment The capacity of Babel Province to implement CC actions is still low. Some arrangements in the form of regional regulations have been in place. These could be starting points to enhance the enabling environment for the Province. At the organisational level, some institutions have integrated CC mitigation and adaptation actions into their strategic plans. Nevertheless, knowledge and awareness still needs to be strengthened for public bodies to align CC implementation with their strategic plans and preserve CC knowledge within the institution.
20
212INSTITUTIONAL RECOMENDATIONS
22
23
MitigationandAdaptation
1. Include mitigation issues in MoHA regulations for sub-national development planning and budgeting. Action: MoHA.
2. Revise the RAD-GRK to provide clarity on tasks and functions in order to implement the mandates of the RAD-GRK consistently. Action: Provincial Secretary / Bappeda
3. Establish the CC mitigation coordination team as the oversight body for the implementation (as mandated in chapter 7), which consist of work units, private companies, and CSO. Action: Provincial Secretary / Bappeda
4. Consider how to strengthen role of Provincial Secretary to coordinate and monitor the implementation of CC activities. Action: Governor.
5. Ensure Bappeda and Environment Agency evaluate annually the emissions calculations. Action: Provincial Secretary.
6. Carry out CC awareness raising for village councils and officials. Communities involved in the village planning and budgeting process should be made aware about climate issues to enable good use of the village budget allocation which could improve the village CC resilience. Action: Bappeda or NGOs with support from UNDP.
7. Establish village links to the SIDIK online database system. It could help the village to identify needs to address CC impact in the future. Action: District Bappeda
8. Provide CC technical assistance and capacity building to all institutions involved in mitigation and adaptation. Action: Bappeda with support from UNDP.
CC Coordination9. Strengthen high level CC coordinating functions as stipulated in the Law on
sub-national government. Action: Provincial Secretary.
InstitutionalRecommendations2
24
10. Expand the tasks of the CC mitigation Coordination Team to include CC adaptation, under the Provincial Secretary. Action: Provincial Secretary.
11. Revise the Governor Regulation on tasks and functions of the sub-national units to add CC, given frequent staff rotation in order to retain institutional memory on CC actions. Action: Province Secretary.
25ANNEX
26
27
Annex1:InstitutionalChapterTables
Table A1.1: Laws and Regulations that Stipulate Regional DevelopmentPlanningandFinancialManagementProcesses- Law 23/2014 on regional government- Law 33/2004 on regional finance- GR 8/2008 on stages, procedures, monitoring & evaluation of regional
development plan.- GR 58/2005 on regional government financial management- GR 41/2007 on regional organisations.- GR 7/2008 on deconcentration and assignment tasks- MoHA Regulation 13/2006 on regional government financial management,
as revised with MoHA Regulation 59/2007 and 21/2011.- MoHA Regulation 54/2010 on regional planning.
Source: Government of Indonesia
TableA1.2:MinisterialRegulationsRelevanttoClimateChangeatSub-nationalLevel
Relevant to CC mitigation actions
- Minister of Home Affairs (MoHA) Regulation 27/2014 on 2015 annual regional plan covers emission reduction and inventory as stated in the National Plan.
- MoHA Regulation 23/2013 on 2014 annual regional plan contains inventory of emissions, prevention of deforestation, flood, & forest-fire, emissions test;
- Minister of Public Work (MoPW) Regulation 11/PRT/M/2012 on National Action Plan on 2012-2020 CC mitigation and adaptation;
- Minister of Forestry (MoFor) Regulation 46/2014 on 2015 action plan, covers mitigation actions.
28
Relevant to CC adaptation actions
- MoHA Regulation 27/2014 on 2015 annual regional plan includes protection and management of coastal area and small islands to encounter climate change impact to follow up result of the World Ocean Conference (WOC) and Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI);
- MoHA Regulation 21/2011 on revision of MoHA Regulation 13/2006 which has included disaster financing scheme;
- MoHA Regulation 30/2010 on guidance of sea resources management;
- MoHA Regulation 33/2006 guidance for disaster mitigation;
- MoPW Regulation 11/PRT/M/2012 on National Action Plan on 2012-2020 CC mitigation and adaptation;
- Minister of Social (MoS) Regulation 128/2011 on Disaster Standby Village;
- Minister of Environment (MoEnv) Regulation 19/2012 on Climate Village Program.
TableA1.3:CCImplementingInstitutionsatNationalLevel
CCImplementingInstitutionsInaccordancewith
RAN-GRK RAN-API1. Ministry of Agriculture P P2. Ministry of Public Works and Housing P P3. Ministry of Environment and Forestry P P4. Ministry of Marine and Fishery P P5. National Disaster Agency (BNPB) P P6. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources P P7. Ministry of Transportation P P8. Ministry of Industry P P9. Ministry of Health P P10. Ministry of Social - P11. Ministry of Information and Communication - P12. Ministry of Defence - P13. Ministry of Research Technology, & Higher
Education- P
14. Ministry of Education and Culture - P15. Ministry of Women Empowerment & Children
Protection-
Source: RAN-GRK and RAN-API
29
TableA1.4:ProvincialLevelInstitutionstoReduceGHGEmissions(RAD-GRK)Sectorsof
GHGemissionsreductions
ProvincialUnits Non-stateinstitutions
1. Agriculture • Agriculture, Plantation, & Livestock office
• Forestry office• Bappeda• Regional Environmental
Agency (BLHD)• Marine & Fishery Office• Food Security Agency• Health Office • Extension Coordinating
Agency (Bakorluh)
• Indonesian Farmer Group of Babel (HKTI Prov Babel)
• Palm oil companies & other plantations companies in Babel
• Babel farmer group• Mining companies that run
CSR program
2. Forestry • Agriculture, Plantation, & Livestock office Forestry office
• Bappeda• BLHD • Public Work Office• Marine & Fishery Office• Food Security Agency• Tourism Office • Regional Secretariat: Legal
and Organization Division; General affairs & facility Division.
• Industry & Trade Office • Watershed Forum • Mangrove Works Group• Education Office • Mining & Energy Office • Team of reclamation &
rehabilitation management (under BLHD)
• Regional Police and other law enforcement officials (attorney & court)
• University/academia/school• Company/licence holder • NGO• Research institution• Youth and religion
organization
30
SectorsofGHGemissionsreductions
ProvincialUnits Non-stateinstitutions
3. Energy • Bappeda• Public Works Office• Transport office• Forestry office• Mining & Energy office• Agriculture office• Statistics Agency• Industry & Trade office
• National Electricity Company (PLN)
• Pertamina
4. Transportation • Bappeda• Public Works Office• Transport office• BLHD • Mining & Energy office• Agriculture office• Statistical agency• Industry & Trading office• Marine & Fishery Office
• Mass-transport companies
5. Industry • Bappeda• Public Works Office• Transport office• BLHD • Mining & Energy office• Statistical agency• Industry & Trading office• Marine & Fishery Office
• Gapeksindo Babel• SOE PT. Timah & private
companies in Babel• PLN Cab. Bangka Belitung• University of Bangka
Belitung /Academia
6. Waste • Bappeda• Public Works Office• BLHD • Statistical agency• Industry & Trading office• Marine & Fishery Office
• Women organization & Family Welfare Group (PKK)
• Youth Organization • Environmental NGO
Source: derived from tables in chapter III, IV, V of the RAD-GRK
31
TableA1.5:Sub-nationalUnitsforAdaptationActionsRegional Government Units
(SKPD)Type of resilience in which the institutions
relevant to involve 1 BAPPEDA Coordinating and supporting2 Agriculture, Plantation,
Livestock office Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security and energy security); global market resilience; coastal area & small islands resilience.
3 Forestry office Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security and energy security); ecosystem resilience; coastal area & small islands resilience.
4 Regional Environmental Agency (BLHD)
Livelihood resilience (sub-sector of health, settlement, and infrastructure); coastal area & small islands resilience.
5 Marine & Fishery Office Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security); livelihood resilience (sub-sector of settlements); ecosystem resilience; coastal area & small islands resilience.
6 Food Security Agency (BKP)
Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security).
7 Public Works office Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security and energy security); livelihood resilience (sub-sector of health; settlements; and infrastructure); coastal area & small islands resilience.
8 Mining & Energy office Economic resilience (sub-sector of energy security); livelihood resilience (sub-sector of settlements and infrastructure); coastal area & small islands resilience.
9 Industry & Trade office Economic resilience (global market resilience)10 Transportation office Livelihood resilience (sub-sector of settlements
and infrastructure); coastal area & small islands resilience.
11 Extension Coordinating Agency (Bakorluh)
Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security
12 Tourism and culture office -13 Education Office Livelihood resilience; coastal area & small islands
resilience.14 Local Disaster Agency Economic resilience (sub-sector of food security);
disaster resilience, livelihood resilience (sub-sector of health; settlements; and infrastructure); coastal area & small islands resilience.
32
Regional Government Units (SKPD)
Type of resilience in which the institutions relevant to involve
15 Health office livelihood resilience (sub-sector of health; and settlements)
16 Agency of Demographic and Family Planning Women Empowerment and Children Protection (BKKBD PPPA)
Ecosystem resilience
17 Social, Employment, & Transmigration Office
Livelihood resilience (sub-sector of settlements); coastal area & small islands resilience.
Source: derived from RAN-API.
TableA1.6:ListofNon-stateActorsPotentiallyInvolvedwiththeRAD-GRK.Sectors
Agriculture Forestry Energy Transportation Industry WasteIndonesian Farmer Group of Babel (HKTI Babel)
Palm oil companies & other plantations companies in Babel
Babel stock farmer group
Mining companies that run CSR program
University/academia/ school
Company/license holder
NGO
Research institution
Youth and religion organization
National Electricity Company, Pertamina
Mass-transport companies
Gapeksindo Babel
PT. Timah (SOE)
Private companies in Babel
PLN Cab. Bangka Belitung
UBB/academia
Women organization & Family Welfare Group (PKK)
Youth Organization
Environmental NGO
Source: CPEIR team
33
TableA1.7:ProvincialRegulationsRelevanttotheRAN-APIRegulations RelevancetotheRAN-API
ProvR 52/2011 on Action Plan for Acceleration of MDGs target achievement
- Livelihood resilience- Ecosystem resilience
ProvR 6/2012 on 2012-2017 Babel Medium Term Development Plan
- Livelihood resilience- Ecosystem resilience- Economic resilience- Specific region resilience
ProvR 2/2014 on Babel Spatial Plan - Livelihood resilience- Ecosystem resilience- Economic resilience
ProvR 4/2014 on regional disaster management - Livelihood resilience
GovR 35/2009 on eliminating malaria disease in the Babel province
- Livelihood resilience
GovR 29/2012 on Regional Action Plan of Gender Mainstreaming (PUG) and GovR 28/2012 on guidance of PUG
- Livelihood resilience
GovR 18/2012 on application and plan of Social Minimum Service Standard
- Livelihood resilience
GovR17/2012 on health insurance - Livelihood resilience
GovR 57/2013 and GovR 36/2014 on general guideline of SATAM EMAS (one billion rupiahs for one sub-district) program
- Economic resilience
GovR 40/2014 on formation of Tourism promotion agency
- Economic resilience
GovR 52/2014 on Food Reserves - Livelihood resilience
GovR 56/2014 on Forestry Plan 2014-2034 - Livelihood resilience- Ecosystem resilience
GovR 7/2014 on mining management - Ecosystem resilience- Economic resilience
Source: Provincial Government
34
TableA1.8:ProvincialUnitsResponsibleforMitigationReportingtoBappedaSector ProvincialUnits Description
Agriculture Agriculture, Plantation, Livestock Office
Not clearly stated , but the only entities responsible as stated in Chapter 4
Forestry Forestry Office Clearly stated to reportEnergy Mining & Energy Office Not clearly stated , but the only
entity to responsible as stated in Chapter 4
Transportation Transportation Office Not clearly stated , not the only entity to responsible.
Industry Industry & Trade Office Not clearly stated , but the only entity to be in charge as stated in Chapter 4
Waste Local Environmental Agency Not clearly stated , not the only entity to responsible.
Source: RAD-GRK
FigureA1.1GovernmentFunctions
Source: Law 23/2014 on Sub-national Government Functions.
35
Ann
ex2:C
apac
ityAsses
smen
tMetho
dology
and
Re
sults
TableA2
.1:Listo
fQue
stion
sand
Indicatorsfo
rCap
acity
Assessm
entM
easuremen
t
1.0En
ablin
gEn
vironm
entL
evel
Enab
ling
envi
ronm
ent
refe
rs t
o ‘e
nviro
nmen
tal
leve
l’ as
sess
men
t to
im
plem
ent
a hi
gh l
evel
pol
icie
s/re
gula
tions
of
regi
onal
go
vern
men
t, no
t an
insti
tutio
nal-s
peci
fic. I
n co
ntex
t of t
he B
abel
Pro
vinc
e, fo
r exa
mpl
e, so
me
wor
king
gro
ups a
re e
stab
lishe
d by
the
auth
oriti
es to
ena
blin
g th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of c
ross
sect
or p
olic
ies (
e.g.
wor
king
gro
up fo
r pov
erty
, MDG
s, g
ende
r mai
nstr
eam
ing,
et
c.).
1.1Institutio
nalarran
gemen
tIn
stitu
tiona
l arr
ange
men
ts re
fer t
o th
e po
licie
s, re
gula
tory
fram
ewor
k, p
roce
dure
s and
mec
hani
sm th
at a
pro
vinc
e ha
s in
plac
e to
le
gisla
te, p
lan,
man
age
and
impl
emen
t gen
der e
quity
, pov
erty
redu
ction
clim
ate
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns.
Gen
eral
Clim
atechan
gevulne
rability-specific
Clim
atechan
ge-
resilie
ntlivelih
oods
DisasterRiskRe
ducti
onAd
dressing
un
derly
ingcausesof
vulnerab
ility
Functio
nalcap
acities:
a.Formulati
ngpoliciesa
ndstrategy
Que
stion
:Do
aut
horiti
es h
ave
the
capa
city
to d
evel
op
clim
ate
chan
ge
polic
y an
d re
gula
tory
fr
amew
orks
and
mec
hani
sm?
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty t
o de
velo
p po
licie
s, r
egul
ation
, an
d m
echa
nism
for c
limat
e ch
ange
resil
ienc
e an
d di
sast
er ri
sk re
ducti
on?
36
Indi
cato
rsEx
isten
ce o
f str
ateg
ic, p
olic
y an
d re
gula
tory
fr
amew
ork
on
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
at
prov
ince
leve
l
Exist
ence
of
se
ctor
al
clim
ate
resil
ienc
e st
rate
gies
, pl
ans
or
polic
ies
for
clim
ate-
resil
ient
liv
elih
oods
su
ppor
t
a)
Exist
ence
of
lo
cal
disa
ster
ris
k m
anag
emen
t pl
an;
b)
Func
tiona
l ear
ly w
arni
ng
syst
ems i
n pl
ace
Exist
ence
of
stra
tegy
to
redu
ce vu
lner
abili
ty
b.Eng
agingstakeh
olde
rQ
uesti
on:
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty to
dev
elop
po
licy
and
regu
lato
ry fr
amew
ork
on c
limat
e ch
ange
(m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n)
that
en
sure
mul
ti-st
akeh
olde
r par
ticip
ation
?
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty t
o de
velo
p po
licy
and
regu
lato
ry
fram
ewor
k on
clim
ate-
resil
ienc
e, d
isast
er ri
sk re
ducti
on, a
nd vu
lner
abili
ty
that
ens
ure
mul
ti-st
akeh
olde
r par
ticip
ation
?
Indi
cato
rsEx
isten
ce
and
effec
tiven
ess
of
dial
ogue
am
ong
insti
tutio
ns t
o di
scus
s fo
rmul
ation
an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n re
late
d po
licie
s
Loca
l pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s are
par
ticip
ator
y
Qua
lity
and
freq
uenc
y of
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns
dial
ogue
be
twee
n st
akeh
olde
rs
Wom
en a
nd o
ther
mar
gina
lized
gro
ups
that
are
vul
nera
ble
to c
limat
e ch
ange
hav
e a
voic
e in
the
loca
l pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s
Clar
ity o
f m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n po
licy
fram
ewor
k fr
om/t
o st
akeh
olde
rsCl
arity
of
polic
y fr
amew
orks
of
clim
ate
resil
ienc
e an
d di
sast
er r
isk
redu
ction
and
its s
take
hold
er e
ngag
emen
t
c.Bud
get,man
agean
dIm
plem
ent
Que
stion
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty to
tran
slate
pol
icy
and
regu
lato
ry fr
amew
orks
on
CC m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n in
to
allo
catio
ns in
the
budg
et a
nd im
plem
ent t
hem
?In
dica
tors
Alig
nmen
t of p
olic
y an
d re
gula
tion
with
bud
get a
nd p
rogr
ams
37
1.2Kn
owledg
ean
dAw
aren
ess
Know
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess
refe
r to
the
cre
ation
and
abs
orpti
on o
f inf
orm
ation
and
exp
ertis
e to
war
ds e
ffecti
ve o
f dev
elop
men
t of
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns a
nd re
late
d to
gen
der e
quity
and
pov
erty
redu
ction
s. W
hat p
eopl
e kn
ow a
nd a
re a
war
e of
un
derp
ins t
heir
capa
citie
s and
hen
ce c
apac
ity o
n cl
imat
e ch
ange
acti
ons d
evel
opm
ent.
Gen
eral
Clim
atevu
lnerab
ility-spe
cific
Clim
ate-resilie
nt
livelihoo
dsDisasterRiskRe
ducti
onAd
dressing
un
derly
ingcausesof
vulnerab
ility
Functio
nalC
apacities
a.FormulatePo
liciesa
ndStrateg
ies
Que
stion
- Do
au
thor
ities
ha
ve
the
capa
city
to
fo
rmul
ate
polic
ies
and
st
rate
gies
to
ac
hiev
e th
eir
visio
n on
clim
ate
chan
ge
actio
ns,
incl
udin
g fo
r cl
imat
e kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
s gen
erati
on?
- Do
aut
horiti
es h
ave
capa
city
to
mon
itor,
anal
yze
and
diss
emin
ate
info
rmati
on o
n cu
rren
t and
futu
re c
limat
e ris
ks
- Do
au
thor
ities
ha
ve
the
capa
city
to
un
ders
tand
cl
imat
e ris
ks
and
prom
ote
adap
tato
in
stra
tegi
es
- Do
auth
oriti
es h
ave
the
capa
city
to
resp
ond
to
disa
ster
s?
- Do
auth
oriti
es
have
th
e ca
paci
ty to
dev
elop
st
rate
gy fo
r hou
seho
lds
to h
ave
secu
re s
helte
r in
cl
imat
e/di
sast
er-
vuln
erab
le a
rea?
- Do
aut
horiti
es h
ave
the
capa
city
to
deve
lop
stra
tegi
es
for h
ouse
hold
s to
have
pro
tect
ed
rese
rves
of f
ood
and
agric
ultu
ral
inpu
ts?
- Do
aut
horiti
es
have
the
capa
city
to
dev
elop
ear
ly
war
ning
syst
em fo
r cl
imat
e ha
zard
? -
hous
ehol
ds?
38
- Do
aut
horiti
es
have
the
capa
city
to
mob
ilize
peo
ple
to e
scap
e da
nger
in
the
even
t of
clim
ate
haza
rds?
- Do
aut
horiti
es h
ave
the
capa
city
to
prov
ide
soci
al a
nd
econ
omic
safe
ty
nets
pro
gram
to
vuln
erab
leb.Eng
ageStakeh
olde
rsQ
uesti
on
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty t
o en
gage
st
akeh
olde
r th
roug
hout
th
e pr
oces
s of
de
velo
ping
cl
imat
e (m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n) p
olic
ies a
nd tr
aini
ng to
pro
mot
e kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
s gen
erati
on?
Do
auth
oriti
es
have
th
e ca
paci
ty to
eng
age
with
an
d de
velo
p pe
ople
’s kn
owle
dge
and
skill
s to
dev
elop
ad
equa
te
adap
tatio
n st
rate
gies
?
Do
auth
oriti
es
enga
ge
stak
ehol
der
in
disa
ster
ris
k m
anag
emen
t?
Do
auth
oriti
es
have
th
e ca
paci
ty to
eng
age
peop
le to
hav
e ac
cess
to
sea
sona
l fo
reca
sts
and
othe
r cl
imat
e in
form
ation
?
Indi
cato
rsEx
isten
ce o
f a p
latfo
rm fo
r mul
ti-st
akeh
olde
r en
gage
men
t on
cl
imat
e po
licie
s fo
r pr
omoti
ng a
war
enes
s, tr
aini
ng a
nd le
arni
ng.
Exist
ence
of m
ulti-
stak
ehol
der e
ngag
emen
t on
resp
ectiv
e cl
imat
e vu
lner
abili
ty-s
peci
fic is
sues
39
c.Bud
get,man
agean
dIm
plem
ent
Que
stion
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty to
mob
ilize
an
d m
anag
e th
e ne
cess
ary
reso
urce
s to
tr
ansla
te th
eir k
now
ledg
e in
to C
C m
itiga
tion
polic
ies a
nd st
rate
gies
?
Do
auth
oriti
es
have
th
e ca
paci
ty
and
reso
urce
s to
pl
an
and
impl
emen
t CC
ad
apta
tion
activ
ities
Do
auth
oriti
es
have
ca
paci
ty a
nd r
esou
rces
to
pla
n an
d im
plem
ent
disa
ster
risk
red
uctio
ns
activ
ities
Do
auth
oriti
es
have
ca
paci
ty
and
reso
urce
s to
pl
an
and
impl
emen
t vu
lner
abili
ty-s
peci
fic
activ
ities
Do a
utho
rities
hav
e th
e ca
paci
ty to
man
age
the
budg
et r
elat
ed w
ith C
C an
d co
ordi
nate
do
nor c
ontr
ibuti
ons?
Indi
cato
rsEx
tent
to w
hich
pol
icie
s and
pro
gram
s mee
t tar
gets
with
in th
e tim
efra
me
Avai
labi
lity
and
size
of th
e bu
dget
env
elop
e fo
r clim
ate
chan
ge p
rogr
ams
Exist
ence
of a
ded
icat
ed u
nit f
or b
udge
tary
man
agem
ent a
nd o
vers
ight
40
2.0Organ
izatio
nalLevel
At o
rgan
izatio
nal l
evel
, gen
der r
espo
nsiv
e, p
over
ty se
nsiti
ve c
limat
e ch
ange
link
to se
vera
l pro
vinc
ial a
genc
ies a
nd o
ffice
s, n
amel
y:
1) R
egio
nal P
lann
ing
Agen
cy (B
APPE
DA);
2) R
egio
nal E
nviro
nmen
t Age
ncy
(BLH
D); 3
) For
estr
y O
ffice
; 4) M
inin
g an
d En
ergy
Offi
ce; 5
) Ag
ricul
ture
, Pla
ntati
on, L
ives
tock
Offi
ce; 6
) Mar
ine
and
Fish
ery
Offi
ce; 7
) Hea
lth O
ffice
; 8) P
ublic
Wor
k O
ffice
; 8) I
ndus
try
and
Trad
e O
ffice
; 9) T
rans
port
ation
Offi
ce 1
0) R
egio
nal D
isast
er A
genc
y (B
PBD)
.2.1Institutio
nalA
rran
gemen
tsIn
stitu
tiona
l arr
ange
men
ts re
fer t
o th
e po
licie
s, re
gulo
ry fr
amew
ork,
pro
cedu
res a
nd m
echa
nism
that
the
prov
ince
has
in p
lace
to
legi
slate
, pla
n, m
anag
e an
d im
plem
ent o
f gen
der e
quity
, pov
erty
redu
ction
clim
ate
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns.
Functio
nalcap
acities
a.Assessa
situati
onand
defi
nem
anda
teQ
uesti
onDo
es t
he o
rgan
izatio
n ha
ve t
he c
apac
ity t
o fr
ame,
man
age,
and
inte
rpre
t a
com
preh
ensiv
e an
alys
is of
the
po
licy
on c
llim
ate
chan
ge a
nd re
late
d to
gen
der e
quity
and
pov
erty
redu
ction
?
Indi
cato
rsQ
ualit
y of
ana
lysis
of e
nviro
nmen
t infl
uenc
es a
nd th
eir r
elati
ve d
egre
e of
impa
ct o
n th
e or
gani
zatio
nEx
isten
ce o
f cle
ar ‘r
ules
of t
he g
ame’
that
est
ablis
h le
gitim
ate
polic
y pr
oces
ses o
f miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
b.FormulatePo
liciesa
ndstrategies
Que
stion
Does
the
orga
niza
tion
have
the
capa
city
to d
evel
op p
olic
ies a
nd m
echa
nism
on
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
and
rela
ted
to g
ende
r equ
ity a
nd p
over
ty re
ducti
on th
at p
rovi
de a
con
siste
nt re
fere
nce
for o
pera
tions
?
Indi
cato
rsEx
isten
ce o
f st
rate
gic
guid
elin
es a
nd m
echa
nism
on
miti
gatio
n, a
dapt
ation
, ge
nder
equ
ity a
nd p
over
ty
redu
ction
c.Eng
ageStakeh
olde
rsQ
uesti
onDo
es th
e or
gani
zatio
n ha
ve th
e ca
paci
ty to
dev
elop
pol
icie
s an
d m
echa
nism
on
clim
ate
chan
ge th
at e
nsur
e m
ulti-
stak
ehol
der p
artic
ipati
on?
Indi
cato
rEx
isten
ce o
f dia
logu
e m
echa
nism
bet
wee
n th
e or
gani
zatio
n an
d re
leva
nt st
akeh
olde
rs to
disc
uss
form
ulati
on
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
clim
ate
actio
ns, g
ende
r mai
nstr
eam
ing,
and
pov
erty
redu
ction
Clar
ity o
f the
org
aniza
tion’
s pol
icy
to st
akeh
olde
rs o
f sta
te a
nd n
on-s
tate
41
d.Bud
get,Man
agean
dIm
plem
ent
Que
stion
Does
the
org
aniza
tion
have
the
cap
acity
to
deve
lop
polic
ies
and
mec
hani
sm t
o in
tegr
ate
clim
ate
chan
ge,
gend
er e
quity
and
pov
erty
redu
ction
in b
udge
ting
proc
ess a
nd im
plem
enta
tion?
Indi
cato
rsEx
tent
to w
hich
clim
ate
chan
ge, g
ende
r equ
ity a
nd p
over
ty re
ducti
on a
ction
s are
allo
cate
d in
bud
get
2.2Kn
owledg
ean
daw
aren
ess
Know
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess r
efer
to th
e cr
eatio
n an
d ab
sorb
tion
of in
form
ation
and
exp
ertis
e to
war
ds e
ffecti
ve o
f dev
elop
men
t of
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns a
nd re
late
d to
gen
der e
quity
and
pov
erty
redu
ction
s. W
hat p
eopl
e kn
ow a
nd a
war
e un
derp
ins
thei
r cap
aciti
es a
nd h
ence
cap
acity
on
clim
ate
chan
ge a
ction
s dev
elop
men
t.
Functio
nalC
apacities
a.Formulatepo
liciesa
ndstrategies
Que
stion
Does
the
orga
niza
tion
have
the
capa
city
to fo
rmul
ate
stra
tegi
es fo
r kno
wle
dge
and
awar
enes
s ge
nera
tion
on
clim
ate
chan
ge a
ction
s?In
dica
tor
Exist
ence
and
qua
lity
of d
evel
opm
ent s
trat
egy
for c
limat
e kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
sb.Eng
ageStakeh
olde
rsQ
uesti
onDo
es th
e or
gani
zatio
n ha
ve th
e ca
paci
ty to
eng
age
stak
ehol
ders
for k
now
ledg
e ge
nera
tion
on c
limat
e ch
ange
th
roug
h ed
ucati
on, t
rain
ing,
and
lear
ning
?
Indi
cato
r Ex
isten
ce a
nd q
ualit
y of
a sp
ace
to d
iscus
s the
kno
wle
dge
and
awar
enes
s of c
limat
e ch
ange
acti
ons
c.Bud
get,man
agean
dim
plem
ent
Que
stion
Does
the
orga
niza
tion
have
the
capa
city
to m
anag
e th
e re
sour
ces
need
ed to
impl
emen
t the
ir kn
owle
dge
on
clim
ate
chan
ge?
Indi
cato
r Ex
isten
ce o
f bud
get a
nd e
xten
t to
whi
ch th
e kn
owle
dge
of c
limat
e ch
ange
is b
eing
impl
emen
ted
42
TableA2
.2:R
esulto
fthe
CCCa
pacityAssessm
enta
tEna
blingEn
vironm
entL
evelin
Bab
elFu
nctio
nal
Capa
city
Insti
tutio
nal A
rran
gem
ents
Know
ledg
e a
nd A
war
enes
sRa
nk
Desc
riptio
nRa
nk
Desc
riptio
nFo
rmul
ate
polic
ies a
nd
stra
tegi
es
2.5
In o
rder
to
com
ply
with
the
PR
61/2
011
on t
he
RAN
GRK
, th
e pr
ovin
ce h
as i
ssue
d RA
D GR
K co
ntai
ns q
ualit
y of
ana
lysis
to
redu
cing
the
GHG
em
issio
ns b
ased
on
BAU
and
pro
ject
ed ca
lcul
ation
of
em
issio
ns.
Ther
e is
no C
C ad
apta
tion
stra
tegy
due
to li
mite
d gu
idan
ce a
nd la
ck o
f kn
owle
dge
of v
ulne
rabi
lity
expo
sure
of C
C in
Bab
el. H
owev
er, s
ome
regi
onal
re
gula
tions
cou
ld b
e st
artin
g po
ints
to
esta
blish
ad
apta
tion
stra
tegy
in th
e fu
ture
.N
o ex
isten
ce
of
anal
ysis
of
clim
ate-
resil
ient
an
alys
is.
No
exist
ence
of
anal
ysis
of c
limat
e-vu
lner
abili
ty.
The
loca
l aut
horiti
es h
ave
acce
ss t
o di
sast
er r
isk
info
rmati
on f
rom
the
Nati
onal
Disa
ster
Age
ncy.
Is
suan
ce o
f new
ly P
rovi
ncia
l Reg
ulati
on 4
/201
4 on
re
gion
al d
isast
er m
anag
emen
t sho
ws t
he c
apac
ity
to fo
rmul
ate
stra
tegy
to re
duce
disa
ster
risk
. Som
e qu
ality
and
freq
uenc
y ac
tiviti
es t
aken
to
resp
ond
disa
ster
s, b
ut n
one
are
spec
ific
to C
C.
2Th
e au
thor
ity d
oesn
’t in
clud
e th
e RA
D GR
K in
to
the
mid
-term
dev
elop
men
t pl
an (
RPJM
D).
Onl
y a
few
of
the
regi
onal
uni
ts h
ave
know
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess
abou
t th
e GH
G em
issio
ns r
educ
tions
. O
nly
the
regi
onal
en
viro
nmen
tal
agen
cy
has
know
ledg
e on
the
CC a
dapt
ation
. Th
e lo
w k
now
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess
is m
ostly
be
caus
e of
fre
quen
cy o
f st
aff r
otati
on,
limite
d kn
owle
dge
tran
sfer
with
in th
e in
stitu
tion,
and
lack
of
dat
a m
anag
emen
t. Th
ere
is no
evi
denc
e on
diss
emin
ating
info
rmati
on
on cl
imat
e ris
ks. T
he p
rovi
nce
does
n’t h
ave
syst
em
to g
ener
ate
the
CC k
now
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess.
An
ea
rly
war
ning
sy
stem
fo
r ge
nera
l ha
zard
, in
clud
ing
clim
ate
haza
rd,
is sh
own
in t
he f
orm
of
ex
isten
ce
of
disa
ster
st
andb
y vi
llage
s an
d di
sast
er r
apid
res
pons
e te
am.
How
ever
lac
k of
co
ordi
natio
n an
d bu
dget
mak
es d
ifficu
lties
to
dist
ribut
e kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
s to
bro
ader
ta
rget
s. T
here
is a
str
ateg
ic p
lan
for
food
sec
urity
un
der t
he re
gion
al fo
od se
curit
y ag
ency
.
43
Func
tiona
l Ca
paci
tyIn
stitu
tiona
l Arr
ange
men
tsKn
owle
dge
and
Aw
aren
ess
Rank
De
scrip
tion
Rank
De
scrip
tion
Enga
ge
stak
ehol
der
1.50
As st
ated
in th
e RA
D GR
K th
at th
e Go
vern
or sh
ould
fo
rm a
coo
rdin
ating
team
to e
ngag
e st
akeh
olde
rs
in i
mpl
emen
ting
the
RAD
GRK,
but
no
furt
her
deci
sion
issue
d by
the
hea
d of
pro
vinc
e. N
one
for
adap
tatio
n ac
tions
. Th
e re
gion
al
plan
ning
pr
oces
s ha
s be
en p
artic
ipat
ory
thro
ugh
syst
em o
f de
velo
pmen
t pl
an f
orum
(M
usre
nban
g). W
omen
an
d ot
her m
argi
naliz
ed g
roup
s hav
e a
voic
e in
loca
l pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss, b
ut le
ss b
eing
acc
omm
odat
ed.
No
parti
cula
r ci
rcul
ar l
etter
add
ress
es a
kin
d of
affi
rmati
ve a
ction
. Th
ere’
s no
t ye
t an
ini
tiativ
e fo
r de
velo
ping
pol
icy
of c
limat
e re
silie
nce
and
invo
lvin
g st
akeh
olde
rs in
its p
roce
ss.
2Th
e pr
ovin
ce
has
enga
ged
stak
ehol
ders
in
es
tabl
ishin
g th
e RA
D GR
K, b
ut n
o ev
iden
ce o
n in
itiati
ng a
dapt
ation
stra
tegy
. Unf
ortu
nate
ly, th
ere
is no
furt
her
follo
w-u
p on
impl
emen
ting
the
RAD
GRK
that
eng
ages
sta
keho
lder
s. T
he p
rovi
nce
was
su
ppos
ed to
form
a c
oord
inati
ng te
am o
f var
ious
st
akeh
olde
rs, w
hich
no
exist
unti
l now
. The
re is
no
evid
ence
that
the
prov
ince
has
cap
acity
to e
ngag
e pe
ople
to
deve
lop
know
ledg
e on
CC
adap
tatio
n st
rate
gy.
Rega
rdin
g di
sast
er
risk
man
agem
ent
ther
e ar
e st
orie
s of
rec
ruiti
ng v
olun
teer
s an
d bu
ildin
g th
eir
capa
city
pro
vide
d by
Soc
ial O
ffice
, in
depe
nden
t org
aniza
tions
, and
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l. Co
rres
pond
to
acce
ss t
o se
ason
al f
orec
ast
and
clim
ate
info
rmati
on,
ther
e is
a fe
w a
necd
otes
th
at f
arm
ers
and
fishe
rmen
cou
ld a
cces
s su
ch
info
rmati
on.
Budg
et,
man
age,
an
d im
plem
ent
2.00
Very
few
bud
gete
d pr
ogra
ms
that
are
in li
ne t
o th
e RA
D GR
K. S
ome
budg
eted
pro
gram
s ca
n be
cl
assifi
ed to
ada
ptati
on a
ction
s, h
owev
er b
ecau
se
adap
tatio
n st
rate
gy h
asn’
t bee
n dr
awn
up, n
one
of
them
is d
efine
d as
CC
resil
ienc
e.
1.50
Disc
ussio
ns a
nd in
terv
iew
s w
ith th
e re
gion
al u
nits
sh
owed
that
the
prov
ince
has
ver
y lo
w k
now
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess o
n cl
imat
e ch
ange
and
risk
s cau
sed
by cl
imat
e, h
ence
ver
y lim
ited
capa
city
to m
obili
ze
and
man
age
the
nece
ssar
y re
sour
ces
for
clim
ate
chan
ge a
ction
s. A
ccor
ding
ly, t
here
are
ver
y fe
w
prog
ram
s th
at m
eet
the
CC a
ction
s, v
ery
smal
l siz
e of
the
bud
get
enve
lope
for
clim
ate
chan
ge
prog
ram
s, a
nd n
o ex
isten
ce o
f a d
edic
ated
uni
t for
bu
dget
ary
man
agem
ent a
nd o
vers
ight
.2.
132.
14
44
TableA2
.3:R
esulto
fthe
CCCa
pacityAssessm
enta
tOrgan
izatio
nalLevelin
Bab
el8
Inst
itutio
ns
Ass
essm
ent o
f Fun
ctio
nal C
apac
ityIn
stitu
tiona
l Arr
ange
men
tsKn
owle
dge
and
Aw
aren
ess
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Rank
Des
crip
tion
BAPP
EDA
3.75
Its f
unct
ions
are
coo
rdin
atin
g, i
nteg
ratin
g an
d sy
nchr
oniz
ing
deve
lopm
ent p
lann
ing,
incl
udin
g in
corp
orat
e th
e RA
D G
RK a
nd i
nitia
te t
he C
C ad
apta
tion
stra
tegy
int
o th
e pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss.
Ther
e ar
e w
ides
prea
d is
sues
on
the
CC m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n in
clud
ed i
n its
str
ateg
ic p
lan,
al
thou
gh s
ome
of t
hem
are
not
cle
arly
defi
ned
as C
C ac
tions
. St
akeh
olde
r pa
rtic
ipat
ions
are
pa
rt o
f dev
elop
men
t pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s at
larg
e.
2.67
Ove
rall
as
agen
cy
who
sh
ould
co
ordi
nate
de
velo
pmen
t pl
anni
ng,
this
ag
ency
st
ill
has
limite
d kn
owle
dge
on
CC
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns.
The
RAD
G
RK
was
es
tabl
ishe
d un
der
its
coor
dina
tion
by
the
RAD
GRK
wor
king
gro
up. H
owev
er, n
o fu
rthe
r st
akeh
olde
r m
eetin
gs a
fter
its
issu
ance
and
no
evid
ence
on
annu
al c
alcu
latio
ns o
f th
e G
HG
em
issi
ons
redu
ctio
n.
Envi
ronm
enta
l Ag
ency
(BLH
D)
4.00
The
BLH
D’s
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an c
lear
ly d
efine
s CC
as
one
of m
ain
indi
cato
rs.
Ther
e ar
e w
ides
prea
d ac
tiviti
es o
n th
e CC
miti
gatio
n an
d ad
apta
tion
actio
ns.
Som
e st
akeh
olde
r pa
rtic
ipat
ions
ar
e cl
early
defi
ned
in s
ome
CC re
leva
nt p
rogr
ams.
4.00
The
agen
cy h
as w
ides
prea
d kn
owle
dge
on C
C m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n ac
tions
and
pro
vide
s te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce o
n th
e G
HG
em
issi
ons
to
othe
r in
stitu
tions
and
dis
tric
ts a
nd li
mite
d on
ad
apta
tion
issu
es.
8 T
he a
sses
smen
t res
ults
are
take
n fr
om co
mbi
natio
n of
the
resp
ectiv
e in
stitu
tions
’ sel
f-ass
essm
ent a
nd th
e CP
EIR
team
’s as
sess
men
t. Th
e se
lf-as
sess
men
t was
car
ried
out i
n th
e m
ini-w
orks
hop
in th
e Sa
ntika
Hot
el, C
entr
al B
angk
a on
May
19-
20, 2
015.
The
CPE
IR te
am’s
asse
ssm
ent i
s ba
sed
mai
nly
on th
e 20
12-2
017
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an (R
enst
ra) o
f res
pecti
ve in
stitu
tions
, pre
viou
s int
ervi
ews d
urin
g vi
sits,
and
a fe
w m
edia
revi
ews.
Th
e as
sess
men
t fra
mew
ork
can
be se
en in
ann
ex 5
.1.
45
Inst
itutio
ns
Ass
essm
ent o
f Fun
ctio
nal C
apac
ityIn
stitu
tiona
l Arr
ange
men
tsKn
owle
dge
and
Aw
aren
ess
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Fore
stry
Offi
ce3.
00Its
Str
ateg
ic P
lan
has c
lear
ly st
ated
CC
miti
gatio
n &
ad
apat
atio
n ac
tions
. Th
e G
HG
em
issi
ons
redu
ctio
n ta
rget
13%
in 2
020
is s
tate
d as
one
of
indi
cato
rs. T
he R
AD
GRK
pro
gram
for t
he fo
rest
ry
sect
or h
as b
een
alig
ned
with
the
Str
ateg
ic P
lan
alth
ough
som
e of
the
pro
gram
s ha
ve d
iffer
ent
targ
ets.
The
CC a
dapt
atio
n ac
tions
incl
uded
the
stra
tegi
c pl
an, e
.g. c
onse
rvat
ion
prog
ram
s an
d m
onito
ring
for
prot
ecte
d fo
rest
. St
akeh
olde
r en
gage
men
t is
pa
rt
of
prog
ram
s of
fo
rest
co
nser
vatio
n, e
co-t
ouris
m a
nd e
nviro
nmen
tal
serv
ices
.
1.67
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
and
evi
denc
e re
leva
nt t
o CC
kno
wle
dge
and
awar
enes
s. So
me
prog
ram
s ha
ve c
lear
ly a
ddre
ssed
CC
rele
vanc
e ac
tiviti
es.
Min
ing
&
Ener
gy O
ffice
2.00
Ther
e ar
e so
me
stra
tegi
es o
f re
leva
nce
to C
C ac
tions
but
not
CC
spec
ific,
e.g
. ex-
min
ing
land
re
clam
atio
n &
re
habi
litat
ion,
pow
er p
lant
of
sola
r an
d m
icro
hyd
ro. I
ts m
onito
ring
targ
et is
ve
ry li
mite
d co
mpa
red
to th
e nu
mbe
r of m
inin
g ar
ea e
xist
. Th
e RA
D G
RK i
sn’t
incl
uded
in
its
stra
tegi
c pl
an. T
here
is n
o m
echa
nism
to e
ngag
e st
akeh
olde
r to
impl
emen
t its
pro
gram
s.
1.67
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
and
evi
denc
e re
leva
nt t
o CC
kno
wle
dge
and
awar
enes
s. So
me
prog
ram
s ha
ve c
lear
ly a
ddre
ssed
CC
rele
vanc
e ac
tiviti
es.
Agric
ultu
re,
Plan
tatio
n,
& L
ives
tock
O
ffice
2.00
Ther
e ar
e so
me
stra
tegi
es o
f re
leva
nce
to C
C ac
tions
but
not
CC
spec
ific
and
not a
ligne
d to
the
RAD
GRK
. Str
ateg
y of
sta
keho
lder
par
ticip
atio
n ex
ist b
ut it
isn’
t rel
evan
t to
CC.
1.33
It ha
sn’t
been
und
erst
ood
that
CC
phen
omen
on
affec
t to
agr
icul
ture
. Lo
w c
apac
ity t
o en
gage
st
akeh
olde
rs t
o ge
nera
te a
war
enes
s re
late
d to
cl
imat
e as
pect
.
46
Inst
itutio
ns
Ass
essm
ent o
f Fun
ctio
nal C
apac
ityIn
stitu
tiona
l Arr
ange
men
tsKn
owle
dge
and
Aw
aren
ess
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Mar
ine
&
Fish
ery
Offi
ce2.
75Its
st
rate
gic
plan
ha
s st
ated
to
us
e pr
o-su
stai
nabi
lity
appr
oach
fo
r re
cove
ry
and
pres
erva
tion
of
the
mar
ine
envi
ronm
ent,
coas
tal
and
smal
l is
land
s, an
d m
itiga
tion
and
adap
tatio
n to
clim
ate
chan
ge.
Enga
ging
st
akeh
olde
rs a
re p
lann
ed th
roug
h pr
ogra
ms l
ike
coas
tal c
omm
unity
em
pow
erm
ent
and
supp
ort
to fi
sher
men
, whi
ch m
ore
for C
C ad
apta
tion.
2.00
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
on
gene
ratin
g sp
ecifi
c CC
re
late
d aw
aren
ess,
alth
ough
ther
e ar
e st
rate
gies
on
com
mun
ity e
mpo
wer
men
t in
coa
stal
are
a an
d sm
all i
slan
ds, w
hich
rele
vant
to C
C. S
trat
egy
to
enga
ge
stak
ehol
ders
do
esn’
t sp
ecifi
cally
st
ate
CC re
late
d, n
onet
hele
ss it
’s re
leva
nt to
CC
adap
tatio
ns.
Som
e pr
ogra
ms
have
add
ress
ed
resi
lienc
e of
liv
elih
ood
and
coas
tal
and
smal
l is
land
s, th
ough
not
spe
cific
to C
C.H
ealth
Offi
ce3.
00Its
stra
tegi
c pl
an h
as in
clud
ed th
e CC
ada
ptat
ion;
al
thou
gh C
C ad
apta
tion
isn’
t sp
ecifi
cally
sta
ted
in i
ts p
rogr
ams.
The
regu
latio
n on
alle
viat
ing
mal
aria
pro
vide
s a
basi
s to
redu
ce v
ulne
rabi
lity,
w
hich
is in
line
with
MD
Gs
targ
et to
ach
ieve
0%
m
alar
ia i
n 20
20.
Stak
ehol
ders
wer
e in
volv
ed
in f
orm
ulat
ing
the
stra
tegi
c pl
an.
Its s
trat
egic
pl
an h
ave
cove
red
prog
ram
s re
leva
nt t
o CC
vu
lner
abili
ty su
ch a
s alle
viat
ing
mal
aria
, den
gue,
di
arrh
ea;
and
com
mun
ity
empo
wer
men
t to
co
mba
t the
dis
ease
s.
3.00
The
office
has
suffi
cien
t kn
owle
dge
on h
ealth
vu
lner
abili
ty
impa
cted
by
CC
, i.e
. m
alar
ia,
deng
ue,
and
diar
rhea
an
d en
viro
nmen
tal
dam
ages
. It
has
som
e CC
ad
apta
tion
diss
emin
atio
n pr
ogra
ms,
alth
ough
no
t sp
ecifi
cally
st
ated
as
CC
ac
tions
. So
me
allo
catio
ns
have
ad
dres
sed
CC
rele
vant
pr
ogra
ms.
Publ
ic W
ork
Offi
ce2.
00Th
ere
are
som
e st
rate
gies
of
rele
vanc
e to
CC
actio
ns b
ut n
ot C
C sp
ecifi
c, e
.g. i
rrig
atio
n, c
lean
w
ater
fa
cilit
y,
river
dr
edgi
ng.
The
RAD
G
RK
isn’
t in
clud
ed i
n its
str
ateg
ic p
lan.
The
re i
s no
st
rate
gy to
eng
age
stak
ehol
der t
o im
plem
ent i
ts
prog
ram
s.
1.33
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
and
evi
denc
e re
leva
nt
to C
C kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
s. H
owev
er,
som
e pr
ogra
ms
have
add
ress
ed C
C re
leva
nce
activ
ities
. Tho
se p
rogr
ams
none
thel
ess
shou
ld
be
re-a
sses
sed
to
get
clar
ity
whe
ther
ar
e re
leva
nt to
CC.
47
Inst
itutio
ns
Ass
essm
ent o
f Fun
ctio
nal C
apac
ityIn
stitu
tiona
l Arr
ange
men
tsKn
owle
dge
and
Aw
aren
ess
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Rank
Des
crip
tion
Indu
stry
&
Trad
e O
ffice
2.00
Ther
e is
no
CC a
ctio
n in
the
RA
D G
RK in
clud
ed
in
its
stra
tegi
c pl
an.
Ther
e ar
e ve
ry
limite
d pr
ogra
ms
rele
vant
to
CC
ad
apta
tion,
e.
g.
faci
litat
ion
for
fishi
ng
indu
stry
. St
rate
gy
to
enga
ge s
take
hold
ers
isn’
t rel
evan
t to
CC.
1.33
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
and
evi
denc
e re
leva
nt
to C
C kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
s. H
owev
er,
som
e pr
ogra
ms
have
add
ress
ed C
C re
leva
nce
activ
ities
. Tho
se p
rogr
ams
none
thel
ess
shou
ld
be
re-a
sses
sed
to
get
clar
ity
whe
ther
ar
e re
leva
nt to
CC.
Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Offi
ce2.
00Th
ere
is C
C ac
tion
in t
he R
AD
GRK
incl
uded
in
its s
trat
egic
pla
n. T
he C
C re
leva
nt is
spe
cific
onl
y to
red
uce
priv
ate
cars
em
issi
ons.
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
to e
ngag
e st
akeh
olde
rs.
1.33
Ther
e is
no
stra
tegy
and
evi
denc
e re
leva
nt
to C
C kn
owle
dge
and
awar
enes
s. H
owev
er,
som
e pr
ogra
ms
have
add
ress
ed C
C re
leva
nce
activ
ities
. Tho
se p
rogr
ams
none
thel
ess
shou
ld
be
re-a
sses
sed
to
get
clar
ity
whe
ther
ar
e re
leva
nt to
CC.
D
isas
ter
Agen
cy (B
PBD
)3.
00Th
e lo
cal
regu
latio
n an
d st
rate
gic
plan
hav
e el
abor
ated
di
sast
er
risk
redu
ctio
n,
incl
udin
g flo
od,
stro
ng
win
d,
and
land
slid
e w
hich
pr
esum
ably
im
pact
ed b
y CC
. Its
str
ateg
ic p
lan
has
clea
rly
stat
ed
enga
ging
st
akeh
olde
rs,
nam
ely
stra
tegy
to
enco
urag
e co
mm
unity
to
unde
rsta
nd d
isas
ter r
isk
redu
ctio
n.
3.00
The
office
ha
s su
ffici
ent
know
ledg
e an
d aw
aren
ess
on d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent,
incl
udin
g di
sast
er p
resu
mab
ly c
ause
d by
CC.
The
re a
re
rele
vant
pr
ogra
ms
to
enga
ge
stak
ehol
ders
, e.
g. p
rovi
sion
of
supp
ort
for
the
stak
ehol
der’s
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
and
inno
vatio
n to
impl
emen
t the
di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t. Th
e ba
rrie
r is
lim
ited
fund
.
48
Annex3.AdditionalInformationonplanningandbudgetingprocess
The annual planning and budgeting process provides another channel for the integration of CC. The stages to incorporate CC actions could be either during the preparation of the provincial/district work plans in February/March or the provincial/district units’ forum (Forum SKPD) in March. The CC knowledge, awareness and capacity of the Regional Planning Office (Bappeda) and the relevant work units will need to be enhanced for this to be done effectively.
An overview of the budget cycle and its calendar is presented at figure below.
FigureA3.1NationalandSub-nationalBudgetCycle
Source: Visualised from Government Regulation No.8/2008
THIS INITIATIVE IS SUPPORTED BY:
Ministry of Finance, Republic of IndonesiaFiscal Policy Agency Gedung RM Notohamiprodjo Jl. Dr Wahidin Raya No. 1 Jakarta, Indonesia Tel: +62-‐21 34831676 hMp://www.fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/pkppim
UNDP Indonesia – Environment Unit Menara Thamrin 8–9th Floor Jl. MH Thamrin Kav. 3 Jakarta 10250 Tel: +62-‐21-‐2980 2300Fax: +62-‐21-‐3983 8941hMp://www.id.undp.org
United NaEons Development Programme
UN Environment Asia and the Pacific Office 2nd Floor, Black A, UN Building Rajdamern Avenue, Bangkok 10200 Email: [email protected] Tel: +662 288 2314 Fax: +66-‐2-‐2803829 hMp://www.unep.org
United NaEons Environment Programme
United Na_ons Development Programme (UNDP) Bangkok Regional Hub (BRH) 3rd Floor United Na_ons Service Building Rajdamern Non Avenue, Bangkok 10200, Thailand Email: [email protected] Tel: +66 (0)2 304 9100 Fax: +66 (0)2 280 2700 hMp://www.climatefinance-‐developmenteffec_veness.org
Governance of Climate Change Finance Team
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
European Union UK Department for Interna_onal Development
Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Coopera_onNorwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
THIS INITIATIVE IS SUPPORTED BY:
Ministry of Finance, Republic of IndonesiaFiscal Policy Agency Gedung RM Notohamiprodjo Jl. Dr Wahidin Raya No. 1 Jakarta, Indonesia Tel: +62-‐21 34831676 hMp://www.fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/pkppim
UNDP Indonesia – Environment Unit Menara Thamrin 8–9th Floor Jl. MH Thamrin Kav. 3 Jakarta 10250 Tel: +62-‐21-‐2980 2300Fax: +62-‐21-‐3983 8941hMp://www.id.undp.org
United NaEons Development Programme
UN Environment Asia and the Pacific Office 2nd Floor, Black A, UN Building Rajdamern Avenue, Bangkok 10200 Email: [email protected] Tel: +662 288 2314 Fax: +66-‐2-‐2803829 hMp://www.unep.org
United NaEons Environment Programme
United Na_ons Development Programme (UNDP) Bangkok Regional Hub (BRH) 3rd Floor United Na_ons Service Building Rajdamern Non Avenue, Bangkok 10200, Thailand Email: [email protected] Tel: +66 (0)2 304 9100 Fax: +66 (0)2 280 2700 hMp://www.climatefinance-‐developmenteffec_veness.org
Governance of Climate Change Finance Team
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
European Union UK Department for Interna_onal Development
Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Coopera_onNorwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
CENTER FOR CLIMATE FINANCE AND MULTILATERAL POLICYFISCAL POLICY AGENCYMINISTRY OF FINANCE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA