climate impact of urban planning

Upload: irina-gaman

Post on 10-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    1/15

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)Published online 19 March 2008 in Wiley InterScience(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/joc.1680

    Investigating the climatic impact of urban planningstrategies through the use of regional climate modelling:

    a case study for Melbourne, Australia

    Andrew M. Coutts,* Jason Beringer and Nigel J. TapperSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, 3800, Australia

    ABSTRACT: Urban planning is a useful method for improving local climate and human health in cities through

    purposefully modifying urban land surface characteristics. This can reduce the potential risks of elevated city temperatures

    due to the urban heat island (UHI). Unfortunately, simple tools are not readily available for urban planners to assess the

    climatological impacts of various urban development scenarios. Urban modelling could be developed into such a tool to

    achieve this. This study attempts to design and evaluate a suitable tool for application in Melbourne, Australia. The Air

    Pollution Model (TAPM) was chosen to assess the impact of a long-term urban planning strategy on local climate and the

    above canopy UHI in Melbourne. Improvements were made to TAPM by increasing the number of urban land-use classes

    in the model and creating a higher resolution land cover database focused on housing density. This modified version of

    TAPM showed a good performance in replicating the surface energy balance compared with an observational flux tower

    site in suburban Melbourne during summer. TAPM simulated a mean maximum UHI intensity of 34 C at 2 a.m. in

    January. A future UHI scenario was then examined (year 2030) using an urban land cover database derived from plans

    in the Melbourne 2030 urban planning strategy. Results highlighted specific areas where planning intervention would be

    particularly useful to improve local climates, namely activity centres and growth areas. The appropriateness of the use of

    TAPM and climate models as a tool in urban planning is also discussed. Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

    KEY WORDS urban planning; urban climate; climate modelling; Melbourne; surface energy balance

    Received 18 August 2006; Revised 1 December 2007; Accepted 10 December 2007

    1. Introduction

    Unplanned and rapid urbanization in cities can often

    lead to negative environmental impacts, including mod-

    ifications to the local urban climate. The urban heat

    island (UHI) phenomenon is often evident in cities

    whereby urban areas are warmer than surrounding rural

    areas. UHIs may contribute towards elevated tempera-

    tures, which can be harmful for vulnerable urban resi-

    dents, particularly during summer and heat wave episodes

    (Rankin, 1959). Higher incidences of heat-related ill-

    nesses including heart disease and even mortality have

    been associated with elevated temperatures within urban

    areas. Those particularly at risk include the elderly, low-

    income earners, and residents in high density, older hous-

    ing stock with limited surrounding vegetation (Smoyer-

    Tomic et al., 2003). Fortunately, there is sufficient evi-

    dence to suggest that urban planning can be a useful

    method for improving local climate and human health

    (Jackson, 2003; Stone, 2005). In order to reduce negative

    climatological impacts, those involved in urban devel-

    opment and design must begin to incorporate climate

    knowledge into planning strategies.

    * Correspondence to: Andrew M. Coutts, School of Geography andEnvironmental Science, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton,Victoria, 3800, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

    UHIs form primarily because of high thermal heat

    capacity and heat storage of urban surfaces, added

    sources of heat from anthropogenic activities, and

    reduced evapotranspiration (Oke, 1988). Within the urban

    canopy (below maximum building height), urban geome-

    try is also important in controlling radiative exchanges

    between the walls and floor of urban canyons. Small

    sky view factors (SVF) and large height to width ratios

    trap radiative energy during the day and limit noctur-

    nal cooling. This leads to the development of peak UHI

    intensities during the night, as rural areas are allowed

    to cool uninhibited. Cloud amount and wind speed areimportant meteorological parameters as they affect long-

    wave cooling and ventilation, which serve as surrogate

    variables describing the relative roles of radiative and tur-

    bulent exchanges in and around the urban region (Morris

    and Simmonds, 2000).

    While the UHI phenomenon has been well documented

    in the climatological literature over the past few decades,

    few cities have developed comprehensive strategies to

    mitigate its intensity. Reasons for little consideration of

    climate related understanding in urban planning include

    a lack of knowledge, economic constraints, and com-

    munication problems (Eliasson, 2000). Added to thesereasons, planning tools are not often available for plan-

    ning authorities to assess the implications of projected

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    2/15

    1944 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    land-use change on local climate (Fehrenbach et al.,

    2001). According to Eliasson (2000), the development of

    such tools based on scientific research that can be incor-

    porated into the urban planning framework should be a

    challenge and focus for urban climatologists. However,

    one such tool that can address the issue of climate impacts

    of urban planning strategies, if adequately developed, isclimate modelling, both local and regional. Climate mod-

    elling that uses specific treatments at the urban surface

    can significantly help in determining the likely impacts of

    large scale urbanization on local climate and UHI devel-

    opment, improving weather forecasts, estimating energy

    consumption, and aiding in urban planning (Kusaka and

    Kimura, 2004).

    Information at all urban scales (global, regional, local,

    and microscale) can be highly beneficial for planners, but

    knowledge about climate at the city (regional) and neigh-

    bourhood (local) scale is specifically relevant as planning

    authorities influence/regulate features at this scale, such

    as heights of buildings. For climate models to be a usefultool in aiding sustainable urban planning, it is important

    that they are correctly able to simulate the urban climate

    at this scale. The urban surface is highly complex and

    models require additional inputs, and new and improved

    parameterizations, to accurately simulate the urban cli-

    mate (Zehnder, 2002). In particular, the high heat storage

    of urban landscapes associated with high thermal admit-

    tance and radiation trapping, as well as the added sources

    of anthropogenic heat, need to be incorporated. Tools like

    satellite imagery (such as MODIS) or databases of urban

    land-use and land classification (LULC), now provide

    finer spatial resolution of the high heterogeneity of urbancharacteristics (albedo, emissivity or heights of buildings)

    across cities as input databases for models (Dandou et al.,

    2005; Jin and Shepherd, 2005). While accuracy in mod-

    elling the urban climate is of prime importance, features

    such as ease of use and short running time should also

    be important factors, as urban planners require tools that

    incorporate such features.

    Recent work in regional scale modelling has seen the

    development of a number of urban models of varying

    degrees of complexity based on two types of param-

    eterization schemes. The first type of scheme involves

    simple modifications to existing land surface schemes

    by modifying or fabricating the parameters of theland surface to broadly behave like an urban surface,

    such as increasing roughness lengths and decreasing

    albedo (Atkinson, 2003). One simple parameterization

    scheme developed by Grimmond and Oke (2002) is called

    the Localscale Urban Meteorological Parameterization

    Scheme (LUMPS). Using net all-wave radiation, sim-

    ple information on surface cover and standard weather

    observations, turbulent and storage heat fluxes can be

    calculated through a series of linked equations. The equa-

    tions include the Objective Hysteresis Model (OHM),

    which uses net all-wave radiation and the surface prop-

    erties of the site to calculate heat storage (Grimmondet al., 1991. Taha (1999) used a bulk parameterization

    approach to better incorporate heat storage and more

    explicitly account for urban canopy layer fluxes, which

    also included the OHM. Similarly, Dandou et al. (2005)

    made modifications to the thermal part of the fifth-

    generation Penn state/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5)

    that incorporated the OHM. The model also included

    anthropogenic heating, while modifications were also

    made to the dynamical part of the model resulting inacceleration to the diffusion processes during unstable

    conditions.

    The second type of parameterization scheme involves

    the inclusion of a separate urban canopy scheme to the

    land surface model by incorporating parameters to rep-

    resent canyon geometry and interactions between the

    walls, rooftops, and roads. A number of variations on

    this approach have been developed. Some characteristics

    of these included using the drag force approach to repre-

    sent the dynamic and turbulent effects of buildings and

    vegetation while the thermal modifications of the surface

    involve a 3D urban canopy (Dupont et al., 2004; Martilli

    et al., 2002). This approach calculates the surface tem-perature of each surface type by taking into account the

    interactions of shadowing and radiation trapping effects.

    Single level urban canopy models have also been devel-

    oped and incorporated into atmospheric models where

    the canopy model simulates turbulent fluxes into the

    atmosphere at the base of the atmospheric model, param-

    eterizing both the surface and the roughness sub-layer

    (Kusaka and Kimura, 2004; Masson, 2000). The Town

    Energy Balance model (TEB) is one such scheme and

    has been shown to simulate the surface energy balance

    and climate well compared with observations (Lemonsu

    et al., 2004; Masson et al., 2002). A good summary ofurban modelling approaches and developments can be

    found in Dandou et al. (2005).

    As a result of such modifications and developments,

    the ability of climate models to simulate the urban

    climate has improved, as has their appropriateness as

    a tool that may aid urban planning. For instance, Taha

    (1999) modelled effects of increased albedo for all the

    LULC types in Atlanta (increasing residential albedo

    from 0.16 to 0.29 etc.) and showed a decrease in the air

    temperature of about 0.5 C. Atkinson (2003) found that

    in London during the day, the albedo, anthropogenic heat,

    emissivity, SVF, thermal inertia and surface resistance to

    evaporation (SRE) all aided the formation of an UHI tovarying amounts of between 0.2 and 0.8 C. SRE was

    the most important factor increasing the UHI intensity

    during the day, while the roughness length decreased

    intensity. At night, the roughness length, emissivity, SVF

    and SRE aided UHI formation by 0.30.75 C, but the

    largest effect (2 C) came from anthropogenic heating

    (Atkinson, 2003). This kind of information is highly

    valuable to urban planners in developing policies for

    reducing negative climatic impacts to protect vulnerable

    urban dwellers from the risk of exposure to elevated heat

    conditions.

    Given the growing knowledge and capacity of urbanclimate modelling, this study attempts to investigate the

    role of climate modelling as a tool for use in urban

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    3/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1945

    planning and to design and evaluate a suitable tool for

    Melbourne, Australia. Through the use of a regional scale

    model, The Air Pollution Model (TAPM), the possible

    climatic impacts of a long-term urban planning strategy

    for Melbourne, were assessed. Future planning directions

    of the strategy aim at encouraging a more compact city

    by clustering and increasing the amount of housing inestablished urban areas. Continued urbanization follow-

    ing existing development patterns is likely to lead to an

    intensification of the UHI (Coutts et al., 2007b). Using

    a modified version of TAPM, we aimed to model the

    regional climate of Melbourne and its subsequent UHI.

    Modifications included an improved urban surface param-

    eterization and an improved land cover input database.

    Results will highlight to urban planners that the UHI is

    an issue that needs to be addressed and identify spe-

    cific areas/regions where planning intervention may be

    required. As well as assessing the impact of the urban

    planning strategy, we will comment on the use of regional

    scale modelling as a tool in urban planning.

    2. Methods

    2.1. The urban planning strategy for Melbourne,

    Australia

    The city of Melbourne, Australia is a rapidly growing city

    with an anticipated population increase of up to 1 million

    people by the year 2030, requiring the development

    of approximately 620 000 new households (Department

    of Sustainability and Environment, 2002). In 2002, the

    Victorian Government introduced a planning strategy toaccommodate this growth titled Melbourne 2030. The

    strategy seeks to achieve a more compact city through

    the development of activity centres (built up centres

    for business, shopping, working and leisure with forms

    of higher density housing) and the establishment of

    an urban growth boundary (Figure 1) (Department of

    Sustainability and Environment, 2002). The anticipated

    development of a more compact city, if not planned

    in an informed manner, could lead to an exacerbated

    UHI intensity. This will be compounded by increased hot

    weather and hazardous climatic conditions through global

    warming (IPCC, 2007), which will impact especially on

    vulnerable urban dwellers. Melbourne already shows anUHI signature, with a 20-year mean maximum UHI of

    2.68 C found at 6 a.m. (Morris et al., 2001). During

    summer, anti-cyclonic events often bring warm and dry

    North to Northeast airflow over Melbourne, and can

    send temperatures in excess of 35 C during the day,

    while mean early morning (6 a.m.) UHI intensity during

    these conditions has been observed at 3.56 C (Morris

    and Simmonds, 2000). These are mean UHI intensities,

    suggesting that under optimal conditions (clear skies

    and low winds) UHI intensity can be much higher. An

    automobile transect across Melbourne in 1992 showed

    a peak UHI intensity as high as 7.1

    C in the centralbusiness district (CBD) during the evening (9 p.m.)

    (Torok et al., 2001).

    Unplanned and hasty urban development could com-

    promise the overall goal of the Melbourne 2030 strategy,

    which aims to achieve a liveable, attractive and prosper-

    ous city. Cities that are low density and reliant on private

    car transport and strong zoning that separates housing,

    employment and services are unsustainable. Rather, a sus-

    tainable city is often described in the urban design liter-ature as compact, high density urban form and supported

    by a comprehensive transport network, which empha-

    sizes connectivity and mixed use developments at critical

    nodes (intersecting transport routes) (Mills, 2005). How-

    ever, this city model can encourage UHI development

    and compromise green-space, potentially threatening the

    environmental quality of the city (Pauleit et al., 2005).

    Melbourne 2030 aims for a sustainable city and the plan-

    ning strategy provided a good opportunity to investigate

    the use of regional climate modelling in assessing urban

    climate modifications resulting from land-use and plan-

    ning policies. Our approach consisted of two scenarios:

    (A) a simulation of the current urban climate and UHIintensity in Melbourne and (B) a year 2030 scenario of

    increased urbanization based on the Melbourne 2030 key

    directions to investigate likely future changes to urban

    climate.

    2.2. The air pollution model (TAPM) and urban

    modifications

    Selecting an appropriate model as a tool for urban climate

    impact assessment and use by urban planners is likely to

    depend on a number of parameters. The accuracy of the

    model must be sufficient to robustly simulate the urban

    climate yet not overly complex, computationally expen-sive, and should be user-friendly. Dandou et al. (2005)

    suggested that despite the simplicity of their bulk urban

    parameterization scheme, improvements in results were

    comparable with that produced by the complex canopy

    scheme of Martilli et al. (2002). The ease of use is likely

    to be important, and inputs of surface characteristics into

    the model should be simply described and readily avail-

    able, such as through easily obtainable data on types

    of surface cover, vegetation cover, albedo, mean build-

    ing height, anthropogenic heating, and dwelling density.

    TAPM (Hurley, 2005) was selected for this study as bene-

    fits included the ability to conduct year-long simulations;

    the ability to run simulations without surface observa-tional inputs; the ease of a PC-based interface for use in

    Windows operating systems; user-defined surface cover

    databases; and a range of methods for analysing outputs.

    Therefore, TAPM has the potential to be adopted as an

    urban planning tool.

    The meteorological component of TAPM is an incom-

    pressible, non-hydrostatic, primitive equation meteoro-

    logical model with a terrain following vertical coordi-

    nate for 3D simulations and a 3D nestable, eularian

    grid (Hurley, 2005). As described in Hurley (2005), the

    prognostic meteorological component solves approxima-

    tions to the fundamental fluid dynamics equations, andrather than requiring site specific observations, flows such

    as sea breezes and terrain flows are predicted against

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    4/15

    1946 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    Figure 1. The Melbourne 2030 compact city with the location of activity centres and the urban growth boundary (Department of Sustainability

    and Environment, 2003) (State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003). This figure is available in colour online at

    www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    a background of larger scale meteorology provided by

    global synoptic analysis. The vertical fluxes are rep-

    resented by a gradient diffusion approach, including a

    counter-gradient term for heat flux from turbulence terms

    determined by solving equations for turbulent kinetic

    energy and eddy dissipation rate. TAPM includes a soil-

    vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) scheme, which is

    used at the model surface, and a radiative flux parame-

    terization at both the model surface and at upper levels

    in the atmosphere.

    For urban land surfaces in TAPM, temperature andspecific humidity are calculated depending on the frac-

    tion of urban surface cover following similar approaches

    for non-urban surfaces, except that the surface properties

    (albedo, thermal conductivity) are given appropriate

    urban values. The anthropogenic heat flux is also included

    in the surface flux equations (Hurley, 2005). A number

    of validation studies and evaluations have been con-

    ducted on TAPM, including one in Melbourne (Hurley

    et al., 2003). For the period July 1997 to June 1998,

    model verification was completed using eight monitor-

    ing sites across Melbourne. Results showed that the 10-

    m winds and screen level temperature were predicted

    very well with a low average Root Mean Square Error(RMSE) and a high index of agreement (IOA) (Hur-

    ley et al., 2003). However, TAPM only incorporated a

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    5/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1947

    single homogeneous urban surface class for the entire

    urban region with single values for land surface parame-

    ters such as albedo and thermal conductivity derived from

    the literature.

    The surface energy balance is simulated in TAPM and

    considered fundamental to an understanding of boundary

    layer climates and is basic to an understanding of suchfeatures as thermodynamic behaviour of air and surface

    temperature and humidity, and the dynamics of local

    airflow (Oke, 1988). Hence, models need to be able to

    replicate the partitioning of available energy adequately

    in order to robustly simulate the resultant climate. The

    urban surface energy balance is given by (Oke, 1988):

    Q +QF = QH +QE +QS

    where Q is net radiation, QF is anthropogenic heating,

    QH is sensible heat flux, QE is the latent heat flux and

    QS

    is the storage heat flux.

    TAPM was modified to improve simulations of urban

    environments by incorporating four urban land surface

    types (low, medium and high density, and CBD) replac-

    ing the existing single urban surface. Surface parameters

    in TAPM for the medium density surface type were speci-

    fied using information from an observational site located

    in suburban Melbourne (Coutts et al., 2007b). The site

    was located in Preston, north of Melbourne (145047,

    374357) in a sprawling, moderately developed hous-

    ing area consisting largely of detached dwellings, typical

    of the Melbourne urban landscape (Figure 2). Site char-acterization showed a plan impervious surface cover of

    62%, which included a plan building area of 45% and had

    a mean height to width ratio of 0.42. Surface character-

    istics observed at the site included fraction of urban and

    vegetation cover (determined from aerial photography);

    mean building height; anthropogenic heat flux (deter-

    mined using population, energy, and transport databases);

    roughness length; and albedo (Table I) and were available

    as model input parameters.

    Surface energy balance measurements from the Pre-

    ston site were used to evaluate the performance of the

    model for simulated medium density housing in Preston.

    Observations were taken from instruments mounted on

    a tall tower at a height of 40 m using the eddy cor-

    relation technique (Baldocchi et al., 1988) to measure

    local scale fluxes (102 104 m) of sensible and latent

    Figure 2. The medium density observational study site in Preston, located north of Melbourne CBD. This figure is available in colour online atwww.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    Table I. The original urban surface characteristics from Preston are given along with the values assigned in the model for

    each level of urban density: fraction of urban cover u; albedo u; anthropogenic heat flux Au (W.m2); thermal conductivity

    ku (W.m1.K1); roughness length z0u (m); building height zH (m); fraction of non-urban area covered by vegetation f; leaf

    area index LAI; minimum stomatal resistance rsi (s1.m1).

    u u Au ku zou zH f LAI rsi

    Observed (Preston) 0.62 0.15 9 12 0.4 12

    TAPM (3.0.2) default 0.5 0.15 30 4.6 1 10 0.75 2 100

    Urban (low) 0.5 0.17 10 15 0.4 8 0.75 2 100

    Urban (medium) 0.65 0.15 15 25 0.6 12 0.75 2 100

    Urban (high) 0.8 0.13 20 40 0.8 16 0.75 2 100Urban (CBD) 0.95 0.1 40 60 2 100 0.75 2 100

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    6/15

    1948 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    heat and momentum. Radiation sensors measured each

    component of the radiation balance, giving net radiation.

    The storage heat flux was calculated as a residual of the

    energy balance equation. Observations of temperature,

    vapour pressure, wind speed, and friction velocity were

    also conducted. Model outputs matching the location of

    the Preston site were compared with the observed sur-face energy balance and meteorological parameters and

    provided information to evaluate how well TAPM repli-

    cated the surface energy balance and simulated the local

    urban climate at the observational site. This site was one

    of three urban flux sites operating at various times and

    locations in Melbourne during 2003 2004 (Coutts et al.,

    2007b).

    The urban land surface characteristics for Urban

    (medium) (Table I) were set to be very similar to the

    medium density observational site described (Preston).

    The low, high, and CBD urban land surface characteris-

    tics were then assigned with reference to the values of

    Urban (medium) (Table I) using expert knowledge of theMelbourne urban landscape from the observational cam-

    paign (Coutts et al., 2007b) and other literature values.

    However, in order to replicate the storage capacity of

    a complex 3D urban surface in a one-dimensional sur-

    face scheme the thermal conductivity was substantially

    increased in the model. Using the value of a component

    material such as concrete in bulk model parameterizations

    does not capture the full influence of the heterogeneous

    urban landscape or the effects of the urban canopy. Sug-

    awara et al. (2001) created a thermal property param-

    eter (combining the product of specific heat and ther-

    mal conductivity) that better represented urban surfaces.This parameter was determined to be much larger than a

    homogenous surface type such as asphalt and concluded

    that the value should be a few times larger than the com-

    ponent material in bulk urban models that do not deal

    with canyon shape explicitly (Sugawara et al., 2001). In

    TAPM, the thermal conductivity value for the land sur-

    face was modified in order to match the storage heat

    flux results from TAPM with the observational results at

    the medium density site in Preston during January. The

    thermal conductivity needed to be increased well above

    realistic values before the surface began behaving simi-

    larly to a real urban surface, identifying the importance

    of canyon geometry in trapping and storing energy.

    2.3. Model configuration and database development

    Model scenarios for the current and year 2030 scenarios

    were performed for January during the Austral summer,

    as urban residents are exposed to higher ambient tempera-

    tures at this time. Large scale synoptic analyses were used

    to force the model between the periods 1997 and 2004.

    Synoptic scale forcing meteorology was provided from

    the 6-hourly Limited Area Prediction Systems (LAPS)

    (Puri et al., 1998) at a 0.75 grid spacing. These 8 years

    of January simulations were conducted so that modelleddifferences were due to land surface changes and not

    due to year-to-year climate variability. Moreover, the

    same forcing data were used for each experiment. The

    modified TAPM version 3.0.2 was configured with three

    nested grids of 110 110 horizontal points with the inner

    grid encompassing the Melbourne metropolitan area at a

    grid spacing of 1000 m centred at 1459E and 3759S.

    The middle and outer grid spacings were 3000 m and

    10 000 m, respectively, and 25 vertical grid levels wereselected with the highest level at 8000 m. Other databases

    of terrain height (9-s DEM), sea surface temperature and

    soil classification data, were also used in the scenarios

    (Hurley, 2005).

    In order to run the scenarios described, relevant

    land surface databases were developed at a suitable

    resolution for input into TAPM. For the current day

    scenario (Scenario A) a vegetation (land-use) database

    was obtained that provided recent vegetation cover (1988)

    (Geoscience Australia, 2003). In addition, a surface

    database of low, medium, and high density areas, as

    well as the CBD, was constructed. Information on census

    districts for the entire Melbourne metropolitan area werecollected (Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2001)

    and the dwelling density calculated for each district

    (dwellings per km2). This information was converted to

    mean dwelling density for 0.01 decimal degree grid cells

    (approximately 1 km). Plans for Melbourne 2030 aim to

    increase the average housing density significantly from

    1000 dwellings per km2 to an average of 1500 dwellings

    per km2 (Department of Sustainability and Environment,

    2002). Therefore, high density areas were deemed to be

    greater than 15 dwellings per hectare, medium density

    areas between 10 and 15 dwellings per hectare and low

    density areas less than 10 dwellings per hectare (thoughgreater than 1) (Figure 3). This database was overlain on

    the vegetation database and used as input into TAPM.

    The database for the Melbourne 2030 scenario (Sce-

    nario B) was based on the documents key directions

    as discussed earlier. Taking the current urban density

    database, the urban growth boundary was added and those

    areas not currently developed within the urban growth

    boundary were assigned to the low density class. The

    location of the proposed 26 Principal, 82 Major, and 10

    Specialized activity centres were then added, by assum-

    ing that the surrounding housing for a 1-km radius would

    be high density (within walking distance). Housing within

    another 1-km radius was anticipated to increase to at least

    medium density while existing high density housing areas

    and the CBD areas remained as such (Figure 3).

    3. Results and Discussion

    3.1. Evaluating TAPM against urban surface energy

    balance observations

    Using the new land surface database of the current Mel-

    bourne urban landscape, TAPM was run for the month

    of January and compared with the observations at the

    medium density observational site (Preston) (Figure 4).TAPM showed a good performance in replicating the

    diurnal course and monthly mean surface energy balance

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    7/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1949

    Figure 3. Land surface database of current density scenario A (left) and the Melbourne 2030 scenario B with the urban growth boundary (right).

    This figure is available in colour online at www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    Figure 4. Comparison of the observed (dashed line) and modelled (solid line) diurnal surface energy balance (observed height 40 m and model

    level 50 m) for location (145047, 374357) and corresponding grid point (043, 084) for the month of January 2004. Regression (fit) equations

    were Q (y = 1.032x + 58.626); QH (y = 1.137x + 30.017); QE (y = 0.789x + 18.819); QS (y = 0.833x + 14.007). This figure is available

    in colour online at www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    for the month of January 2004. The evaporative flux was

    replicated well by the model, only showing an overesti-

    mation in the afternoon. The storage heat flux was also

    well replicated, although some discrepancy was evident

    in both Q

    and QH. This is caused by an overestimationof incoming solar radiation due to the inability of the

    model to capture cloudy skies and poor air quality (which

    can reflect and scatter incoming short wave radiation),

    so monthly averages of Q were overestimated. This

    extra energy led to additional partitioning into QH. On

    the majority of the January days, the TAPM model per-

    formed well. The model also captured important featuresof urban energy balance partitioning (Figure 4). These

    included the hysteresis pattern in QS, showing a peak

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    8/15

    1950 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    approximately 12 h before the peak in Q. The peak

    was not as evident in the observations during this month

    as what was generally seen during the observational cam-

    paign (Coutts et al., 2007b). The asymmetry in QH was

    also evident with the peak occurring later in the after-

    noon. Importantly, both QH and QE remained positive

    into the evening, supported by heat storage release fromthe urban fabric, and remained slightly positive through-

    out the night.

    Despite the discrepancy in Q and QH, the model

    accurately simulated temperature, relative humidity, and

    wind speed (Figure 5). Slight discrepancies were seen

    in the diurnal temperature plot, with a reduced lag in

    temperature approaching its maximum and the nighttime

    temperatures were underestimated, due to underestima-

    tion of nighttime heat storage release. Table II gives the

    January 2004 monthly comparison of modelled meteoro-

    logical variables and their associated error for the model

    grid point corresponding with the measurement tower

    location, compiled following Willmott (1981). Statistical

    comparisons are also given for the surface energy balance

    components.

    Changes in urban surface characteristics influence how

    net radiation is partitioned into each of the surface energy

    balance components, so the flux ratios and how they

    vary between density classes were of particular interest(Figure 6). Also, while the summer month (January) was

    of primary interest, there was also observational data

    available for a full year (Coutts et al., 2007b) and it

    was possible to see how well the model reproduced

    the partitioning of the urban surface energy balance

    seasonally (Figure 6). Therefore, TAPM was also run

    from August 2003 to July 2004 corresponding with the

    year-long observational study. Naturally, partitioning in

    January was good as the model parameters for the urban

    surface characteristics were adjusted to match this data,

    yet over the course of the year, the model did not

    capture QS and QH well. A reasonable replication

    Figure 5. Comparison of observed (left) and modelled (right) temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed (observed height 40 m, model level

    50 m) for location (145047, 374357) and corresponding grid point (043, 084) for the month of January 2004.

    Table II. Statistical comparison between variables for the observational location (145047, 374357) and corresponding model

    grid point (043, 084) for the month of January 2004 of temperature T (C); wind speed WS (m/s); specific humidity q (g/kg);

    friction velocity u (m/s); sensible heat flux QH (W.m2); latent heat flux QE (W.m

    2); and storage heat flux QS (W.m2).

    T WS q u Q QH QE QS

    n 744 744 744 744 744 744 744 744

    O 16.35 4.74 7.21 0.40 146.26 88.01 40.81 17.43

    P 16.00 4.27 6.93 0.44 209.58 130.06 51.00 28.52

    sO 3.76 2.33 1.73 0.21 267.22 116.34 45.58 127.61

    sP 4.03 1.92 1.38 0.23 307.93 151.91 47.88 131.87

    CORR 0.89 0.79 0.73 0.79 0.90 0.87 0.75 0.81

    RMSE 1.84 1.50 1.21 0.15 151.10 87.24 34.61 81.71

    RMSES 0.39 0.94 0.75 0.07 63.90 44.95 14.03 24.06

    RMSEU 1.80 1.17 0.95 0.13 136.92 74.76 31.64 78.09

    MAE 0.35 0.47 0.27 0.04 63.33 42.05 10.19 11.09

    d 0.94 0.86 0.83 0.87 0.93 0.89 0.85 0.89

    r2 0.80 0.63 0.53 0.63 0.80 0.76 0.56 0.65

    n, number of observations; O, observations; P, predicted values; sO sP, observed and predicted standard deviations; CORR, Pearman Correlation;

    RMSE, Root Mean Square Error; RMSES, Systematic RMSE; RMSEU, Unsystematic RMSE; d, Index of Agreement; r2, Coefficient of

    determination (Willmott, 1981).

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    9/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1951

    Figure 6. Mean monthly plots of daytime fractions of Q for each energy balance component and the Bowen Ratio. CBD, HIGH, MEDIUM, and

    LOW correspond to each of the urban classes and OBSERVATIONS correspond to the measured data from Preston. The Bowen Ratio (QH/QE)

    is not shown for the CBD as it was significantly higher (20).

    of observations for the evaporative fraction (QE/Q)

    was seen over the course of the year. Figure 6 also

    demonstrates the differences in partitioning of energy

    between each of the urban land surface classes in the

    model and shows that the influence of changing the landsurface values alters energy balance partitioning. The

    modelled data for these urban classes were not verified

    against any observations.

    Some differences in energy partitioning over the course

    of the year could result from a number of uncertain-

    ties. Actual deep soil volumetric moisture contents were

    not available to initialize the model and we found

    that there was a mismatch in the seasonal course of

    QE/Q between the observations and the model out-

    put (Figure 6). In the model, moisture contents were

    the lowest over the Austral summer months (Decem-

    ber February). Rainfall in Melbourne during Februaryand March 2004, however, was well below average, so it

    was likely that deep soil volumetric moisture contents

    were also below average at this time, leading to the

    reduced energy partitioning into QE. More accurate val-

    ues of monthly soil moisture content could improve this

    result. As expected, QE/Q decreased with increasing

    urban density as the vegetated surface cover was replacedwith greater impervious surface cover, restricting evapo-

    transpiration. Generally, the partitioning of energy into

    QE was acceptable over the course of the year and

    responded well to the changes in surface cover.

    The modelled Urban (medium) heat storage fraction

    (QS/Q) during the summer period generally showed

    a slight underestimation compared with the observations,

    but were much improved compared with earlier versions

    of TAPM. The substantial increases of the values for

    thermal conductivity in the model were large enough to

    capture the significant energy storage by the 3D urban

    landscape. Comparing each of the densities, the amountof heat storage increased with increasing density. How-

    ever, absorption of energy by the urban surface in the

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    10/15

    1952 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    model appeared to saturate (reach a maximum absorptive

    capacity) when increasing thermal conductivity. There-

    fore, despite the increasing thermal conductivity with

    urban density, the 1D land surface in the model did not

    capture the full influence of the 3D canyon morphology

    on heat storage.

    During winter, the land surface scheme did not repli-cate the high heat absorption (QS/Q

    ) by the urban

    fabric that was seen in the observations (Figure 6). In

    most Northern Hemisphere energy balance studies, a

    decrease in heat storage is seen during winter, following

    the reduction in Q, as well as added surface moisture

    for increased QE/Q (Grimmond, 1992), a pattern that

    TAPM did replicate. However, in this case, it may not

    be that TAPM inaccurately represented urban heat stor-

    age, but rather the uncertainty may lie in the observations.

    Spronken-Smith et al. (2006) found in Christchurch, New

    Zealand that under settled anti-cyclonic conditions, a

    strong inversion can occur that can severely restrict tur-

    bulent mixing and influence the above canopy flux mea-

    surements. As the observations in Melbourne calculated

    QS as a residual of the eddy correlation technique, it

    could be that the observational results over emphasize

    the importance of heat storage during stable wintertime

    conditions and is an area that requires further study.

    On account of the slightly underestimated QS/Q,

    the sensible heating fraction (QH/Q) during the sum-

    mertime for the Urban (medium) density was also slightly

    higher than observed. The partitioning of energy was very

    similar for each urban density during summer, though all

    sites were slightly higher than the observations. This is

    often why above canopy temperatures are similar acrossan urban area during the day, as higher density sites

    absorb more energy and QS/Q increases, restricting

    the availability for atmospheric heating, which sometimes

    aids Urban Cool Island (UCI) development in combina-

    tion with shading (Morris and Simmonds, 2000). The

    Bowen ratio (QH/QE) throughout the year was well

    replicated compared with Urban (medium) and increased

    with higher urban density (Figure 6). The Bowen ratio

    from the model results also preceded the observations

    again as a result of the lack of input data for the soil

    moisture content and the influence of this on QE.

    The model was not able to accurately replicate thepartitioning of energy outside of the summer months.

    However, as TAPM was replicating the partitioning of

    energy and meteorological parameters at the surface rea-

    sonably well in January, it can be used for the scenarios

    described with a good degree of confidence. While a

    crude method of parameterizing the model to behave

    more like an urban surface was used, and direct validation

    was not completed on the energy balance partitioning,

    the model has vastly improved on the performance of

    TAPM version 2.0 before the modifications were made

    (data not shown). Additionally, the model was only eval-

    uated for the medium density urban class, so there maybe limitations in the models applicability to other urban

    density classes. The lack of an urban canopy scheme

    could also limit the models capacity to accurately repli-

    cate urban heat storage across density classes. There is

    obvious scope for a specific urban parameterization in

    TAPM.

    3.2. Modelling UHI intensity and the impact of

    Melbourne 2030

    TAPM was configured as described in Section 2.3 and

    run for eight Januaries from 1997 to 2004 to provide an

    ensemble average for current summertime conditions and

    then again for the 2030 planning scenario. The current

    scenario (A) showed a mean nighttime (0200) UHI of

    approximately 34 C in the CBD, reducing as distance

    from the CBD increased (Figure 7(a)). Variability was

    high with anomalous warmer and cooler areas seen across

    the metropolitan area corresponding with urban density

    class. The modelled UHI intensity was similar in range

    to those previously observed in Melbourne (Morris and

    Simmonds, 2000; Morris et al., 2001). During the day

    (1400) the current Scenario (A) screen level UHI was notas intense as at 0200, but still showed an UHI intensity

    of 12 C, with temperatures being more uniform across

    the region (Figure 7(b)). The CBD was not warmer than

    the surrounding urban area. Temperatures away from the

    coast to the north and east of Port Phillip Bay showed

    higher values as a result of mesoscale airflows and a

    regional sea breeze. During the night, the lower wind

    speeds reduced the influence of the regional flows and the

    urban density more strongly controlled the development

    of the UHI. The modelled UHI also varied with synoptic

    conditions that supported maximum UHI development

    under conditions of anti-cyclonic highs centred just eastof Melbourne, low wind speeds and cloudless skies

    (Morris and Simmonds, 2000). The Melbourne 2030

    scenario (B) revealed a slightly modified UHI pattern

    from the current scenario (A) (Figure 7(c) and (d)).

    While the maximum intensity of the UHI did not increase,

    the areal extent of elevated temperatures expanded. The

    nighttime UHI reduced in its spatial variability, becoming

    more uniform across the urban area similar to that of the

    daytime UHI.

    Analysing the difference in screen level tempera-

    ture between the current and Melbourne 2030 scenarios

    allows specific areas of significant warming to be iden-

    tified and is what urban planners are most interested in.The extent of change in the UHI resulting from planning

    strategies shows areas that are particularly vulnerable.

    This information can be used for improved planning deci-

    sions. The greatest temperature increases during night-

    time maximum UHI intensity (Figure 8) were seen in

    areas where development replaced pasture land and in

    new activity centres. Temperatures in other areas of Mel-

    bourne also appeared to respond significantly to increases

    in housing density especially along the edge of the current

    urban-rural boundary. Some of these areas are located

    along transport links and growth areas designated for

    concentrated expansion as outlined in Melbourne 2030.While these areas are likely to show the greatest increase

    in temperatures in 2030, temperatures were only seen to

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    11/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1953

    Figure 7. Spatial variability in mean screen level temperatures for the Melbourne area at 02 : 00 (2 a.m.) and 14 : 00 (2 p.m.) h for each scenario:

    A Current development at 02 : 00 (a) and 14 : 00 (b); B Melbourne 2030 planned development at 02 : 00 (c) and 14 : 00 (d). This figure is

    available in colour online at www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    increase to levels currently seen within the CBD. Initia-

    tives that can help reduce temperature increases can be

    more easily incorporated into newly developing regions,

    rather than in existing urban development. Therefore,these growth areas and new or minimally developed exist-

    ing activity centres could provide excellent opportunities

    for UHI mitigation strategies to be put in place.

    During the day, some portions of Melbourne to the

    west and north showed elevated temperatures following

    the planned development (Figure 9). Interestingly, during

    the day a large fraction of the urban area, mainly where

    development increases from low to higher densities, actu-

    ally showed a very slight decrease (largely insignificant)

    in temperature due to the increased heat storage limiting

    the amount of energy available for atmospheric heating

    and reducing temperatures. The areas of greatest tempera-ture increase were the planned growth areas where devel-

    opment will replace existing natural landscapes. While it

    may seem that these mean temperatures are not high,

    during periods in summer of extreme heat, temperatures

    can be much higher. While higher nighttime tempera-

    tures from restricted nocturnal cooling in urban areas maynot seem like a significant problem, extended periods of

    warmer temperatures can limit nighttime recovery from

    daily heat stress. Inland activity centres that do not feel

    the effects of the cooling sea breeze would especially

    benefit from UHI mitigation measures.

    The planned increase in urban density through the

    establishment of an urban growth boundary and the

    development of activity centres in Melbourne will likely

    lead to a more intense UHI during the night, while during

    the day this is less significant. Coutts et al. (2007b) in

    their observational study in Melbourne found that during

    the summer across three urban sites of varying urbandensity, all sites showed a mean daytime Bowen ratio

    of over 2 and the daily Bowen ratio was sometimes

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    12/15

    1954 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    Figure 8. Change in mean nighttime (02 : 00) screen level temperature change from the current urban development, to that proposed by the

    Melbourne 2030 planning strategy. Areas within the contours are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. This figure is available in

    colour online at www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    Figure 9. Change in mean daytime (14 : 00) screen level temperature from the current urban development, to that proposed by the Melbourne

    2030 planning strategy. Areas within the contours are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. This figure is available in colour

    online at www.interscience.wiley.com/ijoc

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    13/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1955

    in excess of 5. The increase in Bowen ratios with

    increasing urban density modelled in this study were

    not found in the observational results as evaporative

    fluxes were very similar across all housing densities

    despite varying vegetation cover. This was a result of

    poor moisture availability in response to water restrictions

    when observations were conducted (Coutts et al., 2007b).Therefore during the summer, the entire Melbourne

    region experienced warm, dry and hence unfavourable

    climatic conditions. Adoption of the Melbourne 2030

    strategy is not likely to increase Bowen ratios across

    the city significantly, but there will be an extension of

    warm and dry conditions over longer periods of the

    day as well as an extension of the seasonal exposure to

    unfavourable conditions along with an increased spatial

    extent, especially if water restrictions remain tight.

    In this study, the effect of heat trapping and storage in

    the urban environment was replicated in the simulations

    by significantly increasing the thermal conductivity. The

    3D nature and complexity of the urban landscape wasnot explicitly included in the model, unlike new urban

    canopy schemes. As a result, the model could not deliver

    within-canopy temperatures, which could possibly be

    greater than the modelled temperatures in this study.

    Modelled screen level temperatures were also slightly

    underestimated during the evening and night due to an

    underestimation of the slow release of heat stored in

    the urban fabric due to complex canyon morphology

    (including walls). Finally, the Melbourne 2030 scenario

    (B) only accounts for climatic impacts from land cover

    change. Mean global temperatures over the last 100 years

    (1906 2005; 100-year linear trend) have increased by0.74 C (0.18 C) largely as a result of carbon dioxide

    (CO2) emissions (IPCC, 2007), so projected global

    temperature rises (0.2 C per decade for the next two

    decades (IPCC, 2007)) coupled with heating from further

    urban development will lead to further increases in urban

    temperatures. Also, the frequency of extreme warm days

    and nights has increased since 1961 (Plummer et al.,

    1999). Urban areas themselves are a significant source of

    CO2 mostly from vehicles emissions with local annual

    emissions from urban Melbourne as high as 84.9 t

    CO2 ha1 y1 (Coutts et al., 2007a). Urban planning

    measures such as energy-efficient buildings and increased

    public transport use would help contribute to combating

    greenhouse gas emissions.

    4. Conclusions

    Simulations of the changes in climate resulting from the

    proposed land cover changes identified in the directions

    of the Melbourne 2030 plan showed that continued

    increases in density would result in an increased intensity

    of the nighttime Melbourne UHI. Growth areas and

    particular activity centres were predicted to have the

    greatest temperature increases. During the day, the impactof changes in urban development was not seen to

    increase the peak daytime temperature due to increased

    storage limiting the amount of sensible heating of the

    atmosphere. Yet, existing urban climates during summer

    days can already be unfavourable with high Bowen

    ratios regularly observed across varying densities of the

    city (Coutts et al., 2007b). These results demonstrate

    the utility of regional scale climate modelling as a

    tool for climate impact assessment and show the abilityto determine likely climate modifications from simple

    land-use changes based on planning directions. The

    use of TAPM for the Melbourne urban landscape was

    adequate for January, and identified that continued urban

    development in Melbourne could lead to higher diurnal

    exposure to warmer temperatures. Modelling results such

    as these are an excellent way to present and convey

    information and issues to environmental planners.

    Planning in urban areas to ameliorate, and limit the

    development of degraded local climates has been known

    for decades (Aron, 1984; Oke, 1984; Oke, 2005), yet pol-

    icy development in this area is still lacking despite calls

    for improvements. The concept of sustainable settlementsis recognized within Melbourne 2030 with initiatives

    such as those under the direction of A greener city,

    including reducing the impacts of storm-water on bays

    and catchments, and the management of water resources

    (Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2002).

    Melbourne 2030 currently notes concern for issues such

    as global warming and a livable city but an assessment

    of the impact of a more compact city on climate had not

    been undertaken. Our analysis should persuade the devel-

    opment of new policies for UHI mitigation by planners.

    This work may be opportune since the Melbourne 2030

    plan is due for review in 2007. Some initiatives alreadyexist that aid in reducing UHI intensity include energy-

    efficient buildings and encouraging a shift in travel from

    private vehicles to public transport, which will reduce

    anthropogenic heat emissions. While this is good, a com-

    prehensive UHI mitigation strategy for Melbourne is

    required and it is hoped that this study will prompt the

    Melbourne 2030 planning group to act and encourage the

    implementation of UHI mitigation initiatives. It would be

    a great opportunity for the Victorian Government, who

    wish to lead by example in environmental management

    (Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2002).

    Regional scale modelling of urban climate is a pow-

    erful tool and the use of TAPM as a model for usein urban planning has both benefits and shortfalls. As

    TAPM is now set up for Melbourne, further summertime

    scenarios could be conducted to investigate the poten-

    tial of mitigation strategies such as alterations in surface

    albedo or the effect of increasing vegetation cover. Also,

    any type of urban spatial configuration at the neighbour-

    hood scale could also be easily modelled. This study has

    demonstrated the potential for TAPM to become a rig-

    orous model for use in urban planning. However, much

    improvement is still required before it could be com-

    monly used. Operating the model for other Australian

    or international cities may not be feasible without somemodification of surface parameters (requiring local field

    observations) or development of new parameterizations.

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    14/15

    1956 A. M. COUTTS ET AL.

    Also, as the winter performance of the model was poor,

    further improvements to TAPM would be required before

    it could be used as a year round urban climate model

    for climate impact assessment or forecasting. On account

    of the high spatial resolution used in these scenarios,

    compute time was long and could be improved on high-

    performance machines.TAPM does not currently have any urban canopy

    scheme and so does not explicitly resolve canyon geom-

    etry effects and hence there is a lot of room for improve-

    ments through new urban parameterizations. This high-

    lights the need for further developments in urban climate

    modelling within the Australian modelling community,

    especially as the focus on extreme temperatures in urban

    regions grows. The inclusion of an urban canopy scheme

    would also then permit modelling of diurnal tempera-

    ture scenarios, rather than just the monthly averages for

    January presented here. A complex urban canopy model

    with the simplicity and ease of use of TAPM would bean ideal product. The UHI was predicted well compared

    with previous observed ranges of UHI intensity. Future

    work could also involve coupling TAPM with a water

    use model such as Aquacycle (Mitchell et al., 2001),

    which could allow investigation of climate interaction

    with human water consumption and irrigation, which is

    very important (and ever growing in importance), in the

    Melbourne urban landscape.

    Despite the ease of use of the PC-based TAPM,

    substantial resources are required to both understand

    and run the model, and to develop the urban databases

    for their application in the simulations. The potentialoperation of climate models directly by urban planners

    may be unachievable currently and therefore climate

    impact studies of urban development scenarios are best

    out-sourced to urban climatologists. While continued

    model improvements and validation are still needed, even

    the best urban climate model would need to be run by

    those who know how to use it. An inter-disciplinary

    and team-based approach is imperative in order for

    this to be effective (Oke, 2005). As a result, planners

    and climatologists must work together utilizing their

    full knowledge and allowing the development of more

    accurate urban climate predictions.

    Acknowledgements

    Thanks to Peter Hurley for assistance and the conduction

    of modifications to the model. Thanks to Peter Wallace of

    P. G. Wallace Communications for permission of the use

    of the communications tower for the field observations

    and to Christopher Barker for assistance in setting up

    and maintenance of the towers and equipment. The loan

    of instrumentation by Lindsay Hutley (Charles DarwinUniversity) and Russell Jaycock (James Cook University)

    is also greatly appreciated.

    References

    Aron J. 1984. Climatic consciousnessa conscious change in theAustralian architectural environment. Energy and Buildings 7:7175.

    Atkinson BW. 2003. Numerical modeling of Urban heat-islandintensity. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 109: 285310.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2001. 2001 Census, Australia.Baldocchi DD, Hicks BB, Meyers TP. 1988. Measuring biosphere-

    atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with microm-eteorological methods (in special feature: gas exchange in a newdimension). Ecology 69: 1331 1340.

    Coutts AM, Beringer J, Tapper NJ. 2007a. Characteristics influencingthe variability of urban CO2 fluxes in Melbourne, Australia. Atmospheric Environment 41: 51 62.

    Coutts AM, Beringer J, Tapper NJ. 2007b. Impact of increasing urbandensity on local climate: spatial and temporal variations in thesurface energy balance in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of AppliedMeteorology 46: 477493.

    Dandou A, Tombrou M, Akylas E, Soulakellis N, Bossioli E. 2005.Development and evaluation of an urban parameterization schemein the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Journal ofGeophysical Research-Atmospheres 110: 10102.

    Department of Sustainability and Environment. 2002. Melbourne 2030:Planning for Sustainable Growth, State of Victoria, 192.

    Department of Sustainability and Environment. 2003. Page 1 ofAddendum: Figure of Activity Centers and Principle PublicTransport Network 2003 Only, State of Victoria, 2.

    Dupont S, Otte TL, Ching JKS. 2004. Simulation of meteorologicalfields within and above urban and rural canopies with a mesoscalemodel (MM5). Boundary-Layer Meteorology 113: 111158.

    Eliasson I. 2000. The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 48: 31 44.

    Fehrenbach U, Scherer D, Parlow E. 2001. Automated classification ofplanning objectives for the consideration of climate and air qualityin urban and regional planning for the example of the region ofBasel/Switzerland. Atmospheric Environment 35: 5605 5615.

    Geoscience Australia. 2003. Vegetation Post-European Settlement,1988. National Mapping Division.

    Grimmond CSB. 1992. The suburban energy balance: methodologicalconsiderations and results for a mid-latitude west coast city underwinter and spring conditions. International Journal of Climatology

    12: 481497.Grimmond CSB, Oke TR. 2002. Turbulent heat fluxes in urban areas:

    observations and a local-scale urban meteorological parameterizationscheme (LUMPS). Journal of Applied Meteorology 41: 792810.

    Grimmond CSB, Cleugh HA, Oke TR. 1991. An objective urban heat-storage model and its comparison with other schemes. Atmospheric Environment Part B-Urban Atmosphere 25: 311326.

    Hurley PJ. 2005. CSIRO Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No.71, 54.

    Hurley P, Manins P, Lee S, Boyle R, Ng YL, Dewundege P. 2003.Year-long, high-resolution, urban airshed modeling: verification ofTAPM predictions of smog and particles in Melbourne, Australia. Atmospheric Environment 37: 1899 1910.

    IPCC. 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to theFourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange, Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M,

    Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). Cambridge University Press:Cambridge and New York.

    Jackson LE. 2003. The relationship of urban design to human healthand condition. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 191200.

    Jin M, Shepherd JM. 2005. Inclusion of urban landscape in a climatemodelHow can satellite data help? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 86: 681689.

    Kusaka H, Kimura F. 2004. Coupling a single-layer urban canopymodel with a simple atmospheric model: impact on urban heatisland simulation for an idealized case. Journal of the MeteorologicalSociety of Japan 82: 67 80.

    Lemonsu A, Grimmond CSB, Masson V. 2004. Modeling the surfaceenergy balance of the core of an old Mediterranean city: Marseille. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43: 312327.

    Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW. 2002. An urban surfaceexchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Boundary-LayerMeteorology 104: 261304.

    Masson V. 2000. A physically-based scheme for the urban energybudget in atmospheric models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 94:357397.

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc

  • 8/8/2019 Climate Impact of Urban Planning

    15/15

    URBAN PLANNING AND CLIMATE IN MELBOURNE 1957

    Masson V, Grimmond CSB, Oke TR. 2002. Evaluation of the TownEnergy Balance (TEB) scheme with direct measurements fromdry districts in two cities. Journal of Applied Meteorology 41:10111026.

    Mills G. 2005. Progress toward sustainable settlements: a role for urbanclimatology. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 84: 6976.

    Mitchell VG, Mein RG, McMahon TA. 2001. Journal of environmentalmodeling and software. Modeling the Urban Water Cycle 16:615629.

    Morris CJG, Simmonds I. 2000. Associations between varyingmagnitudes of the urban heat island and the synoptic climatologyin Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Climatology 20:19311954.

    Morris CJG, Simmonds I, Plummer N. 2001. Quantification of theinfluences of wind and cloud on the nocturnal urban heat islandof a large city. Journal of Applied Meteorology 40: 169182.

    Oke TR. 1984. Towards a prescription for the greater use of climaticprinciples in settlement planning. Energy and Buildings 7: 110.

    Oke TR. 1988. The Urban energy balance. Progress in PhysicalGeography 12: 471508.

    Oke TR. 2005. Towards better scientific communication in urbanclimate. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 84: 179190.

    Pauleit S, Ennos AR, Golding Y. 2005. Modeling the environmentalimpacts of urban land use and land cover changea study inMerseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 71: 295310.

    Plummer N, Salinger MJ, Nicholls N, Suppiah R, Hennessy KJ,Leighton RM, Trewin B, Page CM, Lough JM. 1999. Changes inclimate extremes over the Australian region and New Zealand duringthe twentieth century. Climatic Change 42: 183202.

    Puri K, Dietachmayer GS, Mills GA, Davidson NE, Bowen RA,Logan LW. 1998. The new BMRC limited area prediction system,LAPS. Australian Meteorological Magazine 47: 203223.

    Rankin DW. 1959. Mortality associated with heat wave conditionsin the Melbourne metropolitan area, January and February, 1959. Australian Meteorological Magazine 26: 96 98.

    Smoyer-Tomic KE, Kuhn R, Hudson A. 2003. Heat Wave Hazards: anoverview of heat Wave impacts in Canada. Natural Hazards 28:463485.

    Spronken-Smith RA, Kossmann M, Zawar-Reza P. 2006. Where doesall the energy go? Surface energy partitioning in suburbanChristchurch under stable wintertime conditions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 84: 137150.

    Stone B. 2005. Urban heat and air pollutionan emerging role forplanners in the climate change debate. Journal of the AmericanPlanning Association 71: 13 25.

    Sugawara H, Narita K, Mikami T. 2001. Estimation of effectivethermal property parameter on a heterogeneous Urban surface. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 79: 1169 1181.

    Taha H. 1999. Modifying a mesoscale meteorological model to betterincorporate urban heat storage: A bulk-parameterization approach. Journal of Applied Meteorology 38: 466.

    Torok SJ, Morris CJG, Skinner C, Plummer N. 2001. Urban heat islandfeatures of southeast Australian towns. Australian MeteorologicalMagazine 50: 113.

    Willmott CJ. 1981. On the validation of models. Physical Geography2: 184194.

    Zehnder JA. 2002. Simple modifications to improve fifth-generation

    Pennsylvania State University-National Center for AtmosphericResearch Mesoscale Model performance for the Phoenix,Arizona, metropolitan area. Journal of Applied Meteorology 41:971979.

    Copyright 2008 Royal Meteorological Society Int. J. Climatol. 28: 19431957 (2008)

    DOI: 10.1002/joc