climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict michael brzoska...

11
Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Upload: holly-oliver

Post on 18-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks

for violent conflict

Michael Brzoska

18. August 2014

Page 2: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Content

Climate change violent conflict risks •Theory•Empirical evidence•Particular vulnerabilities

Climate engineering violent conflict risks – •Solar radiation management•Carbon reduction management•Local precipitation management

Summary•By type of conflict•By level of conflict

Page 3: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate change conflict risks – Theory

-Mulitple possible channels, but also many buffers- Climate change as an additional stressor- Importance of institutions (governance, conflict management)- Relationship between extent of climate change and likelihood of violent conflict (degree of additional stress; viability of institutions)

Page 4: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Limited, controversial, evidence of statistical correlation between changes in climate change indicators and incidences of violence

- Stronger, but also controversial for changes in precipitation than temperature (levels, variation)- Stronger, but less researched, for lower levels of violence (personal, communal violence) than for higher levels of violence (civil wars, international wars)- Stronger, but not uniform, evidence, for historical than current periods

Climate change conflict risks –Empirical evidence

Page 5: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate change risks for violent conflict -Particular vulnerabilities

-Hot spots

- large climate change-related environmental effects (precipitation patterns, extreme weather events)- low income- high dependence on agriculture- weak institutions

- High-tension regions- high level of conflict (ethnic, resource use)- weak/overwhelmed institutions- perception of climate change as conflict driver

- Securitization/militarization of climate change- classifiction of effects of climate change as threat (migration, access to resources; responsibilities, distribution of costs)- focus of response on violent/military means

Page 6: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate engineering conflict risks – Global solar radiation management

• Militarized conflict over governance issues• Lack of agreement/coordination over

• level of temperature• decision-making• unilateral action• cost allocation

• focus of response on violent/military means

•Local and regional side-effects of climate engineering• Differential effects of srm in high-tension regions• perception of differential effects of climate engineering as conflict driver high level of conflict (ethnic, resource use)• weak/overwhelmed institutions• high level of conflict (ethnic, resource use)

Page 7: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate engineering –Carbon reduction management

•Localized measures with global effects but local/regional side-effects

•Enhanced weathering•Biochar•Afforestation•Ocean fertilization•CCS

Page 8: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

•Militarized conflict over governance issues• Conflict over side-effects of climate engineering measures in high-tension regions

• Effects of crm measures dependent on Consequences of resource use (e.g. land for afforestation) Degree of environmental degradation (e.g. ocean fertilization) High level of conflict (ethnic, resource use) Weak/overwhelmed institutions Perception of crm as conflict driver

Climate engineering conflict risks – Carbon reduction management

Page 9: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate engineering conflict risks – Local precipiation management

• Potential for direct military misuse

• Local and regional effects • Differential effects of precipitation management in high-tension regions• Deliberate use to the advantage of groups in conflict • Perception of differential effects of climate engineering as conflict driver • High level of conflict (ethnic, resource use)

Page 10: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

  Hot spots /localized measures

Differential side-effects in high-tension regions

Securitization/ Governance

Climate change + + + ++ + Solar radiation management

+ +++

Carbon reduction management

+(++)Dependent on resource use, environmental degradation

+ +

Local precipitation management

++ +++

Climate engineering violent conflict risks – summary by type of conflict

Page 11: Climate change and climate engineering – comparing the risks for violent conflict Michael Brzoska 18. August 2014

Climate change

Solar Radiation management

Carbon reduction management

Local precipitation management

Local level Likely Less likely Possible Possible

Civil wars Possible Less likely Possible Possible

Interstate war

Less likely Possible Possible Possible

Climate engineering violent conflict risks – Summary by level of conflict