climate change analysis
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
1/34
Climate Presentation
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
2/34
Water Resources Of Pakistan
Present Position
Indus River System annual average inflows are 137.87
MAF [Long Term Average (1922 2009)]
Large variability in annual water inflows, varied
between 98.54 MAF and 218.1 MAF
About 70 - 80% of Indus River System inflows
originating from melting of snow and glaciers
With increase in Population, Pakistan is becoming a
water stressed country. From 5650m/cap water
available in 1951 to about 1000 m/ cap in 2010.
2
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
3/34
Climate Change Studies in WAPDA Eminent Professor from Stanford University Dr.
Wescoat in Collaboration with WAPDA studied
Impact on the flows of River Indus due to ClimateChange 1991.
UBC Watershed Model was used to generate future
flow scenarios This study using GISS and GFDL Models predicted
3.2C and 4.7C increase in temperature respectively
shown change in total annual inflows by 11% - 16% ..( Dr. J. Wescoat, 1991)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
4/34
CHANGES IN TOTAL RIVER INFLOWS UNDER VARIOUSCLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS (MAF)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
ChangesinRiver
Flows
(MAF)
+ 2C + No CHGP +2C -20% P +2C +20%P GISS +30%P GFDL +20%P
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
5/34
Climate Change Impacts on Weather
Wet Season rainfall could increase by 5% -50% by year 2070, with an associateddoubling in the frequency of high intensityrainfall events. (CSIRO study)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
6/34
2020s 2050s 2080s
Temperature Change T(C)
Northern
Pakistan1.41 0.13 3.09 0.29 5.32 0.53
SouthernPakistan 1.04 0.11 2.47 0.14 4.33 0.28
Precipitation Change P(%)
NorthernPakistan
5.15 1.87 6.20 3.87 6.06 6.15
Southern
Pakistan18.83 4.76 20.24 10.15 28.30 11.73
Climate Change Projections for Pakistan
Based on IPCC Scenario A2 Ensemble of 6 GCMs
Source: Climatology Section in GCISC*
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
7/34
Climate Change over Pakistan Past & Future
During last century , average annual temperature overPakistan increased by 0.6C
Temperature increased over Northern Pakistan washigher than over Southern Pakistan (0.8C versus 0.5C)
It is predicted that average temperature over Pakistanwill increase in the range of
1.3 1.5 C by 2020,
2.5 2.8 C by 2050 and
3.9 4.4 C by 2080 (GCISC , GCM ensemble results)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
8/34
Climate Change over Pakistan Past & Future
Precipitation is projected to increaseslightly in summer and decrease in
winter with no significant change inannual precipitation
It is projected that climate change willincrease the variability of monsoon rainsand enhance the frequency and severity
of extreme events such as floods anddroughts
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
9/34
Major Climate Change related Concerns
Increased variability of monsoons
Uncertainty about the fate of Upper IndusBasin glaciers and future water availabilityfrom them
Increased risks of Flood and Droughts Severe water and heat stressed conditions in
arid and semi arid regions, leading to reduced
agriculture productivity and powergeneration
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
10/34
Major Climate Change related Concerns
Increased upstream intrusion of saline water
in Indus Delta, adversely affecting coastalagriculture, mangroves and breeding ground
for fish
Threat to coastal areas, including the city ofKarachi, due to sea level rise and increased
cyclonic activity due to higher sea surfacetemperatures
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
11/34
Upper Indus Basin Glaciers
11
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
12/34
Conflicting Reports on HKH Glacier Status
Although the glaciers all over the world are found to be receding over thepast century, those in the HKH region are reported to be receding fasterthan in any other part of the world and fears have been expressed that ifthe present rate of recession continues, the HKH glaciers might disappear
by 2035 (Rees and Collins 2004, WWF 2005, IPCC 2007) IPCC has recently retracted its statement about the rate of recession anddate of disappearance of Himalaya glaciers (IPCC 2010)
Batura glacier is retreating significantly in recent years (Shroder andBishop 1999)
Some of the Karakoram glaciers are surging rather than receding (Hewitt2005)
There is some uncertainty about the temporal
behaviour of Karakoram glaciers which have notbeen studied in detail because of their difficultterrain and steep slopes
12
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
13/34
World Bank Report 2005
13
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
14/34
Tarbela Average Decadal Flows
62.98
61.03
58.37
63.85
58.13
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1961-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1999 1999-2009
Inflow
Volumes(maf)
Avg = 61.482 maf
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
15/34
15
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
16/34
Upper Indus Basin Study Area
WESTER
NKARAKO
RAMS
16
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
17/34
Climate Change Studies in WAPDA
Recently in 2008 a study focusing on the UpperIndus Basin 40 Years river flows trend was carried
out. Results and conclusions from the studies are:
Significant rising summer flows trend from the
Karakoram eastern tributaries indicate warmer
summers and glaciers recession in this region.
Significant falling summer flows trend from theKarakoram western tributaries indicate cooling
summers and stable or growing glaciers in this
region.
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
18/34
River Indus at Tarbela - Annual Flows Trend
y = -0.0531x + 62.086
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
6
1-62
6
3-64
6
5-66
6
7-68
6
9-70
7
1-72
7
3-74
7
5-76
7
7-78
7
9-80
8
1-82
8
3-84
8
5-86
8
7-88
8
9-90
9
1-92
9
3-94
9
5-96
9
7-98
99-
2000
200
1-02
200
3-04
200
5-06
200
7-08
InflowsV
olume(MAF)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
19/34
River Indus at Kachura Eastern Karakorams
July
(Significant Rising Trend; Mann - Kendall Sig. Level= 98%)
y = 0.0628x + 6.1059
45
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Years
FlowV
olum
e(m
af)
19
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
20/34
River Indus at Kachura Eastern Karakoram
August
( Significant Trend at Mann - Kendall 97.4% Sig. Level )
y = 0.0443x + 6.0162
45
6
7
8
9
10
11
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Period (years)
Flow
Volum
e
(m
illion
acre
feet)
20
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
21/34
River Gilgit at Alam Bridge Western Karakoram
July
( Moderate Falling Trend; Mann - Kendall Sig. Level = 77% )
y = -0.0202x + 4.9132
3.03.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Years
Flow
Volum
e
m
af
21
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
22/34
River Gilgit at Alam Bridge Western Karakoram
August
( Significant Trend at Mann - Kendall 98.5% Sig. Level)
y = -0.039x + 4.7412
2.02.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Period (years)
F
lowV
olum
e
(m
af)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
23/34
River Hunza at Dainyour Western Karakorams
July
(Significant Falling Trend; Mann - Kendall Sig. Level = 98%)
y = -0.0361x + 3.1346
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1993
1995
1997
Years
F
low
Volume
m
af
23
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
24/34
River Hunza at Dainyour Western Karakoram
August( Significant Trend at Mann - Kendall 99.1% Sig. Level)
y = -0.0419x + 3.1628
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1993
1995
1997
Period (years)
Flow
Volum
e
(miilion
acre
fee
t)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
25/34
River Indus at Partab Bridge - July (1962 - 2005)
Man - Kendall Significance Level = 74%y = 0.0244x + 11.715
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
196
2
196
4
196
6
196
8
197
0
197
2
197
4
197
6
197
8
198
0
198
2
198
4
198
6
198
8
199
0
199
2
199
4
199
6
199
8
200
0
200
2
200
4
Flow
s(
m
af)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
26/34
Indus at Partab Bridge
August
( Significant Trend at Mann - Kendall 75.8% Sig. Leve)
y = -0.0155x + 11.809
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.012.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Period (years)
FlowV
olume(maf)
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
27/34
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
28/34
Rising and Falling Trends observed in the Monthly Energy (Degree Days)of Upper Indus Basin High Altitude Weather Stations During 19952009
UIB
Stations
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Khunjerab Z Z Z Z R R F F F R Z Z
Ziarat Z Z R F R R F F F F R Z
Naltar R R R N R R F F F N N R
Yasin Z Z R R R R F F F R R Z
Ushkore R R R R R R N F F N R F
Hushey R R R R R R F N F F R R
Rama Z Z R F R R F F F F N Z
Rattu R R R N R R F F F N F R
Deosai Z Z Z F R R F F F R Z Z
Burzil Z Z Z R R R F F F R Z Z
R = Rising Trend ; F = Falling Trend ; N = No Trend; Z = Zero Degree Days
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
29/34
Trend of Available Glacier Melt Energy at DCP Station Burzil (4000 masl)
(Total Degree Days during Jul; Aug; Sep. Mann-Kendal Sig. Lvl = 91%)
y = -5.2653x + 648.73
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
DegreeDays
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
30/34
Trend of Available Glacier Melt Energy at DCP Station Naltar (2800 masl)(Total Degre e Days during Jul; Aug; Sep. Mann-Kendal Sig. Lvl. = 91%)
y = -6.2368x + 1469
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
DegreeDays
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
31/34
Trend of Available Glacier Melt Energy at DCP Station Khunjerab (4710 masl)(Total Degree Days during Jul; Aug; Sep. Mann-Kendal Sig. Lvl = 95%)
y = -6.7162x + 432.12
250
300
350
400
450
500
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Degr
eeDays
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
32/34
WAPDA Future Plans
Establishment of Glacier Monitoring Research Centre
Study the Climate Change impacts on UIBCryoshpere and Forecast Long-Term water
availability from Upper Indus Basin Monitor Upper Indus Basin Glaciers
Conduct Mass-Balance studies for five selected
glaciers in four years and Carryout Mapping and Monitoring of more than 50
UIB glacier snouts
Training of its staff in using modern concepts,techniques and tools for water resources planningand management
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
33/34
Other Concerns
WAPDA has planned its major Reservoirs andHydropower Projects in Upper Indus Basin.
For their safety and optimum operationfollowing measures are required:
Net work to monitor Floods from rains
Network for monitoring and management ofGLOFs
Set up to monitor and manage land slides
Sedimentation estimation and managementProgram
-
7/29/2019 Climate change analysis
34/34
Thanks