clelie protiere portfolio 2010

36
Clelie Protiere selected work 2009 / 2010

Upload: clelie-protiere

Post on 19-Mar-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

selected work 2009 / 2010

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

Clelie Protiere selected work2009 / 2010

Page 2: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

Clelie Protiere / Architect

17/06/1985 / Saint Etienne / France99 rue Blomet / 75015 Paris

Tel: +33 6 69 95 89 79E mail: [email protected]

website: www.clelieprotiere.com

Page 3: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

Formation à l’Habilitation à la Maîtrise d’Oeuvre en son Nom Propre / Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Paris la Villette / ENSAPVwww.paris-lavillette.archi.fr

Diplôme d’Architecture / Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Versailles / ENSAV / professors: Julien Monfort, Djamel Klouchemention Very Goodwww.versailles.archi.fr

Master II of Architecture / ENSAV

Master I of Architecture / University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign / UIUCwww.arch.uiuc.edu

Licence of Architecture / ENSAV

Scientific Baccalauréat / Saint-Etienne / France

Association with Frederic Martinet (FMAU) to design a private house (120m²), Perpezac-le-Blanc, Francehttp://www.fmau.fr/

Winner of the “Prix BNP Paribas Real Estate des Espoirs de l’Architecture 2009” for the project &CO with Noa Peer.

Philippe Dubus Architectes / PHD / Parishttp://www.philippe-dubus.com/Formation HMONPCDD of 6 months / competiton of 77 social housings, Valenton, France / competiton of a mixed-used building, France / following-up of the construction site of 33 social housings, Tourcoing, France

Bourbouze et Graindorge Architectes / Parisbourbouze-graindorge.comCDD / 1 month / APS of 30 social housings, Aubervilliers, France

Michel Desvigne Paysagistes / MDP / ParisInternship / 5 months / participation in urbanism competitions (Paris La défense, Bordeaux Mériadeck, Bordeaux Rive Droite) / design Museum parc, Saint-Louis, USA, with David Chipperfield Architects / Masterplan of historic garden, Tervuren, Belgium, with Stephane Beel Architects

Hondelatte Laporte Architectes / HLA / Pariswww.hondelatte-laporte.comInternship / 4 months / competition of 50 dwellings at Issy les Moulineaux, France / DCE and private extention construction, Yvelines, France

languagesfrench / native languageenglish / fluent

computerAutocad / Adobe Photoshop / Adobe Illustrator / Adobe Indesign / Sketchup

EDUCATION

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

SKILLS

02 / 2009

2008

2007

2006

2003

2008

2007

since 10 / 2009

09 / 2009-03 / 2010

07 / 2009

05 / 2010

11 / 2009

Page 4: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

05/2010La Grange Nouvelle /Perpezac-le-Blanc / FranceDesign for a countryside house private clientwith Frédéric Martinet (FMAU)

The landscape of the project is both rural and agricultural. The cutting of the soil draws quite sim-ilar-sized hedge farmlands which are adapted to the topography and demands of the crops. These handy imperatives give an out-line to an undulating landscape underlined by bright hurdles.

Inside the enclosures, the frame, mainly composed of farms and their guest houses, gathers simple conglomerate geometri-cally-shaped volumes in a nar-row perimeter. The disposal and height of the buildings, on the first floor and in the roof space, bring a protection against the prevail-ing winds and a privileged solar exposition.

The project looks like a long prism similar to the size of the

surrounding barns. Its setting-up, close to the house of the neigh-bour, makes it less isolated. The L-shaped house shows that it’s only a residential building. To-gether with the newly-built barn, the whole site changes status. From an insular house, the per-ception of the agglomerate turns into a farm and its guest-houses corpus.

The materiality of the project is the one of a farm made of varied, perennial, simple surfaces.The architecture of the nearby village shows some half-timberings, white and calcareous stone walls and slate roofs. The project gets its inpsiration from this range of coulours and textures in order to build a specific and precise answer.

Page 5: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: View of the South Ouest side with the covered South terrasse and the seat-window. bottom: View ot the dining space and the kitchen

Page 6: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

view of the wood structure with the curved South terrasse and the interiors spaces organisation.

Page 7: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: plan of the first floor with the swimming pool, medium: interior views bottom: view of the North facade

Page 8: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

03/2010

The Heterotropic Gallery / Austin / USAOpen Competition for a temporary Art gallerywith Noa Peer

The temporary heterotropic gallery is com-posed of a simple 10’x20’ rectangular base and ceiling (divided into 3) and 30 identical revolving shades. Each shade, sized 2’x11”, rotates on a central axis and is of bipartite nature – one side is made of white metal panel while the other is a mirror. Adjusting the position of the shades allows the artist to be the director of its mise en scene, composing microclimates within the exhibition space. The gallery embraces heterotropic climates that work like a tool of perception.

The gallery’s kaleidoscopic skin functions like a camouflage, confusing foreground and background. By looking carefully at the con-struction the spectators looks at the environ-ment around him. However, the skin can also generate microclimates within the gallery: when put on an asphalt road - the gallery’s climate turns gray, while surrouded by vege-tation – the climate becomes green and when floating on the river –the climate is blue.

Page 9: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top left: climates localisations, top middle: scenographies, top right: schematic plans, bottom: frontal view

Page 10: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

03/2010“An Open Relationship” / Henna / FinlandOpen Competition for an Eco-district of 20 000 peoplewith Daphnée Courthiade / Naik Lasherme / Noa Peer

What should be the starting point when planning a new town from a clean slate? The programme brief asks for a masterplan illustrating the town’s growth 20 years ahead. As much as a drawing can show a final vision of a town, it is inflexible and hardly adaptable to unpredictable events which can take place during its development. Typically the accom-plishment of a masterplan depends on the precise realisation of the built area form, fixed decades before. Furthermore, a masterplan, like a puzzle, separates the town into pro-grammatic zones which can only function as a whole. The quality of a town depends on the interactions between these programmatics areas, and the relations between the inhabit-ants with their environment.

Instead of thinking about the final masterplan, we decided to research the process to ensure these relations within time. We suggest defin-

ing a series of 6 parameters – levels of mix-ture, mass distribution, building regulation, space sharing, available square meter per person, energy dependence, as guiding lines for the town’s development.

These parameters, which are based on economic and environmental opportunities, establish the town’s futur life style and spatial qualities. This kind of approach, inspired from Maxwan’urban plan for Leidsch rijnt, allows a progressive evolution of space by permitting a participative negoctiation of the design dur-ing each step of the urban development.

These spatial and social components take into account the logic of economical, politi-cal, legislativ and administrative phenomena which determinate the town genesis. They create an invisible landscape of data formed by constraints and opportunities.

Page 11: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: total parameters plan, bottom: the 6 parameters with 1: level mixture, 2: mass distribution, 3: level of buildings regulation, 4: level of shareholding, 5: available personn space, 6: level of fossil energy dependance

1 2 3

4 5 6

Page 12: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

0 100 500 1000

eco_village center

station_town center

black box_energy line

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

Highway

Primary Road

Secondary road

Tertiary road_to be developed later

Train

Lines used for freight

Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines

Cycle ways_to be developed later

Pedestrian ways_to be developed later

Train station_Influence circles

500 m

1000 m

3000 m

Bus stop_Influence circles100 m

300 m

500 m

Light car station_car renting

pole 2

pole 3

pole 1

mobility plan over 5 years of Henna developpment with the bus Loop (in orange) and the 3 main poles of developpment

Page 13: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top left and right: aerial view and detail view of the pole 1, middle left and right: aerial view and detail view of the pole 3, bottom left and right: aerial view and detail view of the pole 2

Page 14: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

love shacks

nursing home & kindergarten

swimming pool & supermarket

farms

bloc upgrade

bloc upgrade 2

private houses

reuse factory

shacksauna

water

rain

biofuel

winter cereals and leguminous farm

Pulp mill

pulp mill

light cars

public transporatation

methanol fuel

methanol fuel

cellulose insulation

wood pulp

cellulose

forest

wood

paper mill

forestation

steam

powerelectricity

$$$

beforepulp mill

afterpulp mill + light cars

$$$

big-box revival

big box

recreation

wind turbines

spacepeople permeability

landscape

paper mill

power

$$$electricity

beforebig box

afterbig box + recreation + wind turbines

beforeshack

aftershack + sauna+ tree

housing bloc

mix

protect

collectvegetation

cellulose insulation

water

cooling

green pockets

commerce

mix

heat

vegetation

2+2=4

pulp mill

light cars

forest

forest

paper mill

big boxhouses

residential

farm

cellulose insulation

methanol fuel

methanol fuel

wood

organic and mineral nutrients

organic and mineral nutrients

organic waste

organic waste

organic waste

electricity

winter cereals and leguminous

fruits and vegetables

heat

electricity

retention basin(collective)

gardens, parcs

rain water

irrigation

retaining

irrigation

local farmer’s market

electricity

forest

heat

maintenance

personal consumption

protect cellulose insulation

rain water

house

service water tank

vegetable garden

irrigation

retaining

huber MCB

retention basin(collective)

retaining

irrigation

heat

heatcoolingpersonal

consumption

local farmer’s market

rain water

service water tank

irrigation

local farmer’s market

retention basin (collective)

electricity

paper

wood pulp

water

water

water

paper

steam

$$$

$$$

reuse

used clothes

plastic bottles

wood boardswood boards

electronics

new clothes

plastic bowls

wood chairs

shelves

ethanol fuel

public transporatation

$$$

$$$

$$$

methanol fuel$$$

electricity

electricity

virtuous circle

Page 15: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: plan of the center (pole 1) with the train station and the bus Loopbottom: view of the pole 1 with a residential co-operative on the first plan

Page 16: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

11/2009

&COBnp Paribas Real Estate “Espoir de l’architecture 2009”Competition, First Prizewith Noa Peer

The question evoked by the compe-tition, implied, first of all, a thought worthy of each of the contemporary habits related to habitat and work. Be-fore bringing up how they interact, it is important to understand what these practices are and towards where they tend. It is a delicat topic as it relates to both the private sphere of domes-tic lifestyle but also the public one of the workplace. Reveal and confront these existing metropolitan situations will evoke this potential diversity. In the case of this competition, the test-ing ground was that of metropolitan Paris: the city in which we live, we work and stroll around every day.

The Haussmann block is a powerfull and recurring urban fabric composing the city’s landscape. In this project,

we were interested in its spatial unit along with its intrinsic qualities and weaknesses: its social diversity, great density, internal courtyard impover-ished of any functional usage and finally, the monofunctionality of most Parisian city blocks. As a result, we have designed &CO.

&CO is a fictional hyperbuilding-block contemplated according too 4 non-exhaustive principles that question, each in its own way, the changing customs and lifestyles of our society:1/ the mutualized spaces2/ the MetaCOurtyard or updating courtyard3/ mutating spaces or services on demand4/ non stop block

Page 17: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

view of the mutable offices in connection with the running track

Page 18: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

view of one the “black rooms” with its common terrace connecting offices and dwellings

Page 19: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: transversale section, middle: longitudinale section (extract), bottom: fifth level (extract) with the shared gardens connecting to the dwellings

Page 20: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

view of the offices’ shared kitchen linked to the leisure spaces

Page 21: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: axonometry of the mixed-used plot building, bottom left: view of the studio’s shared spaces, bottom right: view of the Hub, a non stop work place on the street level

Page 22: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

06/2009

“The Kanaleneiland’s Hills” / EUROPAN 10 / Utrecht, Netherlands

Open Competitionwith Bérénice Behaghel, Lisa Charron, Eugénie Naert

The Kanaleiland bars are remarkable. All of them. Thin, long, widely spaced, they play an important role in the surrounding public space. A space largely empty and uncertain. Grassy strips be-tween two roads, the open spaces are present in the most vulgarised form.

Addition of a blanket of concentrated patio hous-es. Home with patios are grouped under a same sloped roof that becomes a new public space. This slope becomes part of the economic activity of the area; the angle allows effective rainwater management, which during heavy rain storms then becomes a floodable public space. The economic activity of the blanket responds to a more poetic activity which is that of the housing, because it’s spread and very flat, it has to adapt to the existing site. A strange collision is thus created between domestic uses created by the proximity of the flats and the vast surface spread. Untypical events are created through the collision of the existing flats and the new “geology” of the patio houses. Strange, poetic places will be born as domestic culture is projected in this formal, hybrid space.

Page 23: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: concept and section, middle left: concept image of the South and North plot, mid-dle right: North plan at 1m high, bottom: North plan at 3m high and 7m high

Page 24: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

05/2009En attendant Versailles /Versailles / FranceENSAV Competition for the redesign of the Place des Manègeswith Noa Peer

The project’s site –place des Manèges – has no distinct spatial qualities. It is a trnasitions space crossed by thousand of tourists going from the train station to visit the chateau and back, surrounded by plain restaurants and souvenir shop. Highly touristic spot, it couldd only stay that way. The project does’nt pre-tend in giving the square back to the people of Versailles but aims towards its major population –the tourists. They come for a day visits at the Chateau and its majectic gardens through the traversable Maneges square –that become a place of passage in the meantime while waiting to see the monuments...

The place is monochrome, somple, uniform. The project reinterpret the “jardin à la fran-çaise” – its monumentality and originality. Its elements - Le Bosquet, Les Topiaires, Les Statues and La Fontaine are being alternated, revised, reinterpreted and frozen throughout the project’site.

Page 25: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top left: view of the “Fontain”, middle left: view of the “Stairs”, bottom left: view of the “Allée des Topières”, right: concept

Page 26: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

180 x 150 /Bagnolet / FranceENSAV Diploma / professors: Julien Monfort, Djamel Klouchemention Very Good

The esplanade above the concrete slab, belongs to the joint owners. Each month, they pay charges for it.Although it is officially private, it is of public use.

Dimensions : 180 m x 150 m. Each joint own-er has 29 m² of this space,the equivalent of a big parisian studio flat to his feet. Officialy. But where are theyexactly? In the South, right under the wind and the sun? In the North, under the damp shadow of the F building? In the West with the view on the Eiffel tower and the interchange on the M3? These 29 m² are virtual in fact. The esplanade belongs to each owner. The esplanade belongs to everyone. Everything can be imagined. Nothing hap-pens. Empty, it looks tired. Let’s take back the sale contract, let’s rede-fine more precisely a proper space for each flat on the esplanade. Let’s divide it into 630, the number of flats in the jointly owned build-ings. Once the traffic areas deducted, a roof , four walls, 13 m² on the ground and 13 m² of top terrace are left. Let’s invade the 3 hect-

02/2009

ares of the esplandes by these small spaces to the point of asphyxia in some places...

The slab is a beautiful machin. Here a filing local, there a chinese catholic temple... This underground which seems to grow under our feet,fuels generously the collectiv imaginaryof the inhabitants. Whatever, these warehouses are here, work with their own economy. Let’s keep them. Let’s keep the interior streets. Give them, by a better design, a better perfor-mance.

The relation with the « landscape” reduced,are transfer on the rooftops of the buildings, in specific programms in relation with the sky like a “swing field”, a climb wall, a “skyspace” ... To the slab economy responds the poetic activity of the sky. This poetic en-ters itself in a economic form. The exceptional situation of the rooftops permits to increase the intensity of ordinary equipments (swings, climbwall...) impoverished and under-estimate in their capacity to generate happiness.

Page 27: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

esplanade view with the micro-architectures and the micro-climats roof-rooms

Page 28: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

view of the “micro-climates roof-rooms” along the Tropical place

Page 29: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

plan of the esplanade (extract) with the buildings halls entrances

Page 30: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: roof-rooms climatisation plan bottom: roof plan (extract)

Page 31: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

1,2, 3: views of the roof buildings, 3: view of the Mediterranean place, 4: interior view of the slab, 5: View of the Ouest entrance ramp on the esplanade

Page 32: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

05/2008The Museum Art Contemporary Park / Saint Louis / USA

Michel Desvigne, Paris

design

Page 33: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

top: plan and section of the principal concret plinth, bottom: plan of the plinths

Page 34: clelie protiere portfolio 2010

09/2009 70 Social Housings / Valenton / FrancePhilippe Dubus Architecte, Paris

Competition design

02/2010Mixte-used Building in an Eco District / Bourges / FrancePhilippe Dubus Architecte, ParisCompetition design

07/200930 Social Housings / Aubervilliers / France

Bourbouze Graindorge Architectes, ParisAPS design

Professionnal experiences

Page 35: clelie protiere portfolio 2010
Page 36: clelie protiere portfolio 2010