clelie protiere portfolio 2010
DESCRIPTION
selected work 2009 / 2010TRANSCRIPT
Clelie Protiere selected work2009 / 2010
Clelie Protiere / Architect
17/06/1985 / Saint Etienne / France99 rue Blomet / 75015 Paris
Tel: +33 6 69 95 89 79E mail: [email protected]
website: www.clelieprotiere.com
Formation à l’Habilitation à la Maîtrise d’Oeuvre en son Nom Propre / Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Paris la Villette / ENSAPVwww.paris-lavillette.archi.fr
Diplôme d’Architecture / Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Versailles / ENSAV / professors: Julien Monfort, Djamel Klouchemention Very Goodwww.versailles.archi.fr
Master II of Architecture / ENSAV
Master I of Architecture / University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign / UIUCwww.arch.uiuc.edu
Licence of Architecture / ENSAV
Scientific Baccalauréat / Saint-Etienne / France
Association with Frederic Martinet (FMAU) to design a private house (120m²), Perpezac-le-Blanc, Francehttp://www.fmau.fr/
Winner of the “Prix BNP Paribas Real Estate des Espoirs de l’Architecture 2009” for the project &CO with Noa Peer.
Philippe Dubus Architectes / PHD / Parishttp://www.philippe-dubus.com/Formation HMONPCDD of 6 months / competiton of 77 social housings, Valenton, France / competiton of a mixed-used building, France / following-up of the construction site of 33 social housings, Tourcoing, France
Bourbouze et Graindorge Architectes / Parisbourbouze-graindorge.comCDD / 1 month / APS of 30 social housings, Aubervilliers, France
Michel Desvigne Paysagistes / MDP / ParisInternship / 5 months / participation in urbanism competitions (Paris La défense, Bordeaux Mériadeck, Bordeaux Rive Droite) / design Museum parc, Saint-Louis, USA, with David Chipperfield Architects / Masterplan of historic garden, Tervuren, Belgium, with Stephane Beel Architects
Hondelatte Laporte Architectes / HLA / Pariswww.hondelatte-laporte.comInternship / 4 months / competition of 50 dwellings at Issy les Moulineaux, France / DCE and private extention construction, Yvelines, France
languagesfrench / native languageenglish / fluent
computerAutocad / Adobe Photoshop / Adobe Illustrator / Adobe Indesign / Sketchup
EDUCATION
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
SKILLS
02 / 2009
2008
2007
2006
2003
2008
2007
since 10 / 2009
09 / 2009-03 / 2010
07 / 2009
05 / 2010
11 / 2009
05/2010La Grange Nouvelle /Perpezac-le-Blanc / FranceDesign for a countryside house private clientwith Frédéric Martinet (FMAU)
The landscape of the project is both rural and agricultural. The cutting of the soil draws quite sim-ilar-sized hedge farmlands which are adapted to the topography and demands of the crops. These handy imperatives give an out-line to an undulating landscape underlined by bright hurdles.
Inside the enclosures, the frame, mainly composed of farms and their guest houses, gathers simple conglomerate geometri-cally-shaped volumes in a nar-row perimeter. The disposal and height of the buildings, on the first floor and in the roof space, bring a protection against the prevail-ing winds and a privileged solar exposition.
The project looks like a long prism similar to the size of the
surrounding barns. Its setting-up, close to the house of the neigh-bour, makes it less isolated. The L-shaped house shows that it’s only a residential building. To-gether with the newly-built barn, the whole site changes status. From an insular house, the per-ception of the agglomerate turns into a farm and its guest-houses corpus.
The materiality of the project is the one of a farm made of varied, perennial, simple surfaces.The architecture of the nearby village shows some half-timberings, white and calcareous stone walls and slate roofs. The project gets its inpsiration from this range of coulours and textures in order to build a specific and precise answer.
top: View of the South Ouest side with the covered South terrasse and the seat-window. bottom: View ot the dining space and the kitchen
view of the wood structure with the curved South terrasse and the interiors spaces organisation.
top: plan of the first floor with the swimming pool, medium: interior views bottom: view of the North facade
03/2010
The Heterotropic Gallery / Austin / USAOpen Competition for a temporary Art gallerywith Noa Peer
The temporary heterotropic gallery is com-posed of a simple 10’x20’ rectangular base and ceiling (divided into 3) and 30 identical revolving shades. Each shade, sized 2’x11”, rotates on a central axis and is of bipartite nature – one side is made of white metal panel while the other is a mirror. Adjusting the position of the shades allows the artist to be the director of its mise en scene, composing microclimates within the exhibition space. The gallery embraces heterotropic climates that work like a tool of perception.
The gallery’s kaleidoscopic skin functions like a camouflage, confusing foreground and background. By looking carefully at the con-struction the spectators looks at the environ-ment around him. However, the skin can also generate microclimates within the gallery: when put on an asphalt road - the gallery’s climate turns gray, while surrouded by vege-tation – the climate becomes green and when floating on the river –the climate is blue.
top left: climates localisations, top middle: scenographies, top right: schematic plans, bottom: frontal view
03/2010“An Open Relationship” / Henna / FinlandOpen Competition for an Eco-district of 20 000 peoplewith Daphnée Courthiade / Naik Lasherme / Noa Peer
What should be the starting point when planning a new town from a clean slate? The programme brief asks for a masterplan illustrating the town’s growth 20 years ahead. As much as a drawing can show a final vision of a town, it is inflexible and hardly adaptable to unpredictable events which can take place during its development. Typically the accom-plishment of a masterplan depends on the precise realisation of the built area form, fixed decades before. Furthermore, a masterplan, like a puzzle, separates the town into pro-grammatic zones which can only function as a whole. The quality of a town depends on the interactions between these programmatics areas, and the relations between the inhabit-ants with their environment.
Instead of thinking about the final masterplan, we decided to research the process to ensure these relations within time. We suggest defin-
ing a series of 6 parameters – levels of mix-ture, mass distribution, building regulation, space sharing, available square meter per person, energy dependence, as guiding lines for the town’s development.
These parameters, which are based on economic and environmental opportunities, establish the town’s futur life style and spatial qualities. This kind of approach, inspired from Maxwan’urban plan for Leidsch rijnt, allows a progressive evolution of space by permitting a participative negoctiation of the design dur-ing each step of the urban development.
These spatial and social components take into account the logic of economical, politi-cal, legislativ and administrative phenomena which determinate the town genesis. They create an invisible landscape of data formed by constraints and opportunities.
top: total parameters plan, bottom: the 6 parameters with 1: level mixture, 2: mass distribution, 3: level of buildings regulation, 4: level of shareholding, 5: available personn space, 6: level of fossil energy dependance
1 2 3
4 5 6
0 100 500 1000
eco_village center
station_town center
black box_energy line
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
Highway
Primary Road
Secondary road
Tertiary road_to be developed later
Train
Lines used for freight
Multimodal ring: heavy bus lines
Cycle ways_to be developed later
Pedestrian ways_to be developed later
Train station_Influence circles
500 m
1000 m
3000 m
Bus stop_Influence circles100 m
300 m
500 m
Light car station_car renting
pole 2
pole 3
pole 1
mobility plan over 5 years of Henna developpment with the bus Loop (in orange) and the 3 main poles of developpment
top left and right: aerial view and detail view of the pole 1, middle left and right: aerial view and detail view of the pole 3, bottom left and right: aerial view and detail view of the pole 2
love shacks
nursing home & kindergarten
swimming pool & supermarket
farms
bloc upgrade
bloc upgrade 2
private houses
reuse factory
shacksauna
water
rain
biofuel
winter cereals and leguminous farm
Pulp mill
pulp mill
light cars
public transporatation
methanol fuel
methanol fuel
cellulose insulation
wood pulp
cellulose
forest
wood
paper mill
forestation
steam
powerelectricity
$$$
beforepulp mill
afterpulp mill + light cars
$$$
big-box revival
big box
recreation
wind turbines
spacepeople permeability
landscape
paper mill
power
$$$electricity
beforebig box
afterbig box + recreation + wind turbines
beforeshack
aftershack + sauna+ tree
housing bloc
mix
protect
collectvegetation
cellulose insulation
water
cooling
green pockets
commerce
mix
heat
vegetation
2+2=4
pulp mill
light cars
forest
forest
paper mill
big boxhouses
residential
farm
cellulose insulation
methanol fuel
methanol fuel
wood
organic and mineral nutrients
organic and mineral nutrients
organic waste
organic waste
organic waste
electricity
winter cereals and leguminous
fruits and vegetables
heat
electricity
retention basin(collective)
gardens, parcs
rain water
irrigation
retaining
irrigation
local farmer’s market
electricity
forest
heat
maintenance
personal consumption
protect cellulose insulation
rain water
house
service water tank
vegetable garden
irrigation
retaining
huber MCB
retention basin(collective)
retaining
irrigation
heat
heatcoolingpersonal
consumption
local farmer’s market
rain water
service water tank
irrigation
local farmer’s market
retention basin (collective)
electricity
paper
wood pulp
water
water
water
paper
steam
$$$
$$$
reuse
used clothes
plastic bottles
wood boardswood boards
electronics
new clothes
plastic bowls
wood chairs
shelves
ethanol fuel
public transporatation
$$$
$$$
$$$
methanol fuel$$$
electricity
electricity
virtuous circle
top: plan of the center (pole 1) with the train station and the bus Loopbottom: view of the pole 1 with a residential co-operative on the first plan
11/2009
&COBnp Paribas Real Estate “Espoir de l’architecture 2009”Competition, First Prizewith Noa Peer
The question evoked by the compe-tition, implied, first of all, a thought worthy of each of the contemporary habits related to habitat and work. Be-fore bringing up how they interact, it is important to understand what these practices are and towards where they tend. It is a delicat topic as it relates to both the private sphere of domes-tic lifestyle but also the public one of the workplace. Reveal and confront these existing metropolitan situations will evoke this potential diversity. In the case of this competition, the test-ing ground was that of metropolitan Paris: the city in which we live, we work and stroll around every day.
The Haussmann block is a powerfull and recurring urban fabric composing the city’s landscape. In this project,
we were interested in its spatial unit along with its intrinsic qualities and weaknesses: its social diversity, great density, internal courtyard impover-ished of any functional usage and finally, the monofunctionality of most Parisian city blocks. As a result, we have designed &CO.
&CO is a fictional hyperbuilding-block contemplated according too 4 non-exhaustive principles that question, each in its own way, the changing customs and lifestyles of our society:1/ the mutualized spaces2/ the MetaCOurtyard or updating courtyard3/ mutating spaces or services on demand4/ non stop block
view of the mutable offices in connection with the running track
view of one the “black rooms” with its common terrace connecting offices and dwellings
top: transversale section, middle: longitudinale section (extract), bottom: fifth level (extract) with the shared gardens connecting to the dwellings
view of the offices’ shared kitchen linked to the leisure spaces
top: axonometry of the mixed-used plot building, bottom left: view of the studio’s shared spaces, bottom right: view of the Hub, a non stop work place on the street level
06/2009
“The Kanaleneiland’s Hills” / EUROPAN 10 / Utrecht, Netherlands
Open Competitionwith Bérénice Behaghel, Lisa Charron, Eugénie Naert
The Kanaleiland bars are remarkable. All of them. Thin, long, widely spaced, they play an important role in the surrounding public space. A space largely empty and uncertain. Grassy strips be-tween two roads, the open spaces are present in the most vulgarised form.
Addition of a blanket of concentrated patio hous-es. Home with patios are grouped under a same sloped roof that becomes a new public space. This slope becomes part of the economic activity of the area; the angle allows effective rainwater management, which during heavy rain storms then becomes a floodable public space. The economic activity of the blanket responds to a more poetic activity which is that of the housing, because it’s spread and very flat, it has to adapt to the existing site. A strange collision is thus created between domestic uses created by the proximity of the flats and the vast surface spread. Untypical events are created through the collision of the existing flats and the new “geology” of the patio houses. Strange, poetic places will be born as domestic culture is projected in this formal, hybrid space.
top: concept and section, middle left: concept image of the South and North plot, mid-dle right: North plan at 1m high, bottom: North plan at 3m high and 7m high
05/2009En attendant Versailles /Versailles / FranceENSAV Competition for the redesign of the Place des Manègeswith Noa Peer
The project’s site –place des Manèges – has no distinct spatial qualities. It is a trnasitions space crossed by thousand of tourists going from the train station to visit the chateau and back, surrounded by plain restaurants and souvenir shop. Highly touristic spot, it couldd only stay that way. The project does’nt pre-tend in giving the square back to the people of Versailles but aims towards its major population –the tourists. They come for a day visits at the Chateau and its majectic gardens through the traversable Maneges square –that become a place of passage in the meantime while waiting to see the monuments...
The place is monochrome, somple, uniform. The project reinterpret the “jardin à la fran-çaise” – its monumentality and originality. Its elements - Le Bosquet, Les Topiaires, Les Statues and La Fontaine are being alternated, revised, reinterpreted and frozen throughout the project’site.
top left: view of the “Fontain”, middle left: view of the “Stairs”, bottom left: view of the “Allée des Topières”, right: concept
180 x 150 /Bagnolet / FranceENSAV Diploma / professors: Julien Monfort, Djamel Klouchemention Very Good
The esplanade above the concrete slab, belongs to the joint owners. Each month, they pay charges for it.Although it is officially private, it is of public use.
Dimensions : 180 m x 150 m. Each joint own-er has 29 m² of this space,the equivalent of a big parisian studio flat to his feet. Officialy. But where are theyexactly? In the South, right under the wind and the sun? In the North, under the damp shadow of the F building? In the West with the view on the Eiffel tower and the interchange on the M3? These 29 m² are virtual in fact. The esplanade belongs to each owner. The esplanade belongs to everyone. Everything can be imagined. Nothing hap-pens. Empty, it looks tired. Let’s take back the sale contract, let’s rede-fine more precisely a proper space for each flat on the esplanade. Let’s divide it into 630, the number of flats in the jointly owned build-ings. Once the traffic areas deducted, a roof , four walls, 13 m² on the ground and 13 m² of top terrace are left. Let’s invade the 3 hect-
02/2009
ares of the esplandes by these small spaces to the point of asphyxia in some places...
The slab is a beautiful machin. Here a filing local, there a chinese catholic temple... This underground which seems to grow under our feet,fuels generously the collectiv imaginaryof the inhabitants. Whatever, these warehouses are here, work with their own economy. Let’s keep them. Let’s keep the interior streets. Give them, by a better design, a better perfor-mance.
The relation with the « landscape” reduced,are transfer on the rooftops of the buildings, in specific programms in relation with the sky like a “swing field”, a climb wall, a “skyspace” ... To the slab economy responds the poetic activity of the sky. This poetic en-ters itself in a economic form. The exceptional situation of the rooftops permits to increase the intensity of ordinary equipments (swings, climbwall...) impoverished and under-estimate in their capacity to generate happiness.
esplanade view with the micro-architectures and the micro-climats roof-rooms
view of the “micro-climates roof-rooms” along the Tropical place
plan of the esplanade (extract) with the buildings halls entrances
top: roof-rooms climatisation plan bottom: roof plan (extract)
1,2, 3: views of the roof buildings, 3: view of the Mediterranean place, 4: interior view of the slab, 5: View of the Ouest entrance ramp on the esplanade
05/2008The Museum Art Contemporary Park / Saint Louis / USA
Michel Desvigne, Paris
design
top: plan and section of the principal concret plinth, bottom: plan of the plinths
09/2009 70 Social Housings / Valenton / FrancePhilippe Dubus Architecte, Paris
Competition design
02/2010Mixte-used Building in an Eco District / Bourges / FrancePhilippe Dubus Architecte, ParisCompetition design
07/200930 Social Housings / Aubervilliers / France
Bourbouze Graindorge Architectes, ParisAPS design
Professionnal experiences