clean development mechanism of the kyoto protocol group j - matt bastyan, simon crook, joe payne,...

19
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Upload: christopher-hickey

Post on 28-Mar-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE

KYOTO PROTOCOL

Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula

Urry

Page 2: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Introduction

• Definition of the CDM• Section A: Types of projects (renewable,

buildings & afforestation/reforestation)• Section B: Standards & definitions• Conclusion

Page 3: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

DEFINITION ‘The purpose of the clean development mechanism shall be to assist Parties not included in Annex I in achieving

sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention, and to

assist Parties including Annex I in achieving compliance with their quantified emission

limitation and reduction commitments […].’ (UNFCCC, 1998)

Page 4: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Section A: Individual sectors

Project Mix of CDM (UNEP Risoe, 2010)

Page 5: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Afforestation & Reforestation

• 15% of global anthropogenic carbon emissions are from deforestation

• “forest” within CDM

Page 6: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

A/R Conclusions

• Barriers within A/R sector: – CDM policies and guidelines are unclear– Community based projects often over looked– Economic incentives favour profitable projects– Maximum crediting period of 21 years is not enough

for A/R projects– Carbon sequestration calculations ignore parts of

the forest carbon cycle

Page 7: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Renewable

• Including:– Hydropower– Geothermal– Wind power

Page 8: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Renewable Conclusions

• More projects under CDM than other sectors– Majority are hydropower (27%)

• Negatives associated with renewable sector:– Projects can cause large scale relocation– Financial investment is limited

Page 9: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Building sector

• 25-30% energy related CO2 emissions globally

• Low costs technologies and measures allow great potential for emissions reductions

• Few projects approved, therefore, emissions curbing is limited

Page 10: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Building Sector Conclusions

• Barriers within buildings sector:– Many small emissions sources– Technology specific measures – Lack of baseline and monitoring methodologies– Difficulty proving project additionality– Economic incentive too weak

Page 11: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Section B: Standards & definitions

Page 12: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Additionality

• Emissions ‘[...] by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity.’

(UNFCCC, 2002)

• Greenhouse gas emissions from the projects are lower than if the project did not take place

(Mendis & Openshaw, 2004)

Page 13: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Reasons for rejection

Page 14: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Sustainable development

• Underlining principle of CDM • ‘[…] meeting the needs of the

present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.’ (UN, 1987)

• Host countries define SD criteria (Marrakesh Accord, 2001)

Page 15: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Limitations for host countries

• Multiple definitions of key CDM requirements • Additionality favours existing technology, it is

a barrier to innovation• Competition to attract investment driving

down sustainable development standards– “Race to the bottom” (Sutter & Parreno, 2007)

Page 16: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Opportunities for financial institutions

• Major traders are speculators (Chan, 2009)

• Potential cost savings by using CERs instead of EUAs

• Oligopoly of DOEs– e.g. TUV SUD

• ‘green-washing’– e.g. BP, Shell,

CER €t-1 (15 Mar-26 Apr 2010)(Point Carbon, 2010)

Page 17: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Conclusion

• Projected reduction of 1,035mt CO2e by 2012 through CDM

But…• Untapped potential of CDM• CDM aims are overlooked• Corporate gain

not emission reduction not sustainable development

Page 18: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

Questions?

Page 19: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Group J - Matt Bastyan, Simon Crook, Joe Payne, Sarah Teverson, Michael Treiber, Paula Urry

ReferencesChan, M. (2009) Subprime carbon? Re-thinking the world’s largest new derivatives market, Friends of

the Earth, USAPoint Carbon. (2010). Carbon Market Daily. Retrieved April 26, 2010, from Point Carbon:

http://www.pointcarbon.com/news/cmd/1.1439103Sutter, C. & Parreno, J. (2007) Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its

sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects, Climatic Change, Vol. 84, pp. 75-90

UN (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11.12.1987 (Access date: 19.4.2010)

UNEP Risoe. (2010). CDM Pipeline Analysis and Database, March 1st 2010. Retrieved April 11, 2010, from UNEP Risoe Centre: Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development: http://cdm pipeline.org/

UNFCCC. (1998). Kyoto Protocol - Article 12 . Retrieved April 2010, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf#page=12

UNFCCC. (2001). The Marrakesh Accords. Retrieved April 2010, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: http://unfccc.int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf

UNFCCC (2002) Report of the Conference of the parties on its seventh session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001 – Part two: Action taken by the conference of the parties: http://unfccc/cp/2001/13/Add.2