clean agent system designs

Upload: wermerm

Post on 01-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    1/63

    Clean Agent System DesignClean Agent System Design

    Eric Forssell and Scott HillEric Forssell and Scott Hill

    Hughes Associates, Inc.Hughes Associates, Inc.

    (410) 737(410) 737--86778677

    www.haifire.comwww.haifire.com

    NFPA World Fire Safety Congress & ExpoNFPA World Fire Safety Congress & Expo

    May 14, 2001May 14, 2001

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    2/63

    ObjectiveObjective

    Discuss specific issues affecting clean agentDiscuss specific issues affecting clean agentsystem design and system reliabilitysystem design and system reliability

    -- Extinguishing ConcentrationsExtinguishing Concentrations

    -- Safety/Design FactorsSafety/Design Factors-- Concentration/Exposure LimitsConcentration/Exposure Limits

    -- Design SoftwareDesign Software

    -- Thermal DecompositionThermal Decomposition

    -- Agent RetentionAgent Retention

    -- Enclosure Pressure and VentingEnclosure Pressure and Venting

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    3/63

    What are clean agents?What are clean agents?

    Definition: No residue or collateral damageDefinition: No residue or collateral damageresulting from discharge of agent.resulting from discharge of agent.

    Historically: Carbon dioxide and Halon 1301 wereHistorically: Carbon dioxide and Halon 1301 were

    the agents of choice. Ban on production of Halonthe agents of choice. Ban on production of Halon1301 due to contribution to stratospheric ozone1301 due to contribution to stratospheric ozone

    depletion.depletion.

    Current agents include a variety of halocarbon andCurrent agents include a variety of halocarbon and

    inert gasesinert gases

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    4/63

    ApplicationsApplications

    High system cost justified by high value ofHigh system cost justified by high value ofprotected space or protected equipment beingprotected space or protected equipment being

    mission/process criticalmission/process critical

    Typical applications: TelecommunicationsTypical applications: TelecommunicationsEquipment, Computer/Electronics Equipment,Equipment, Computer/Electronics Equipment,

    Control Rooms, Process Critical Equipment,Control Rooms, Process Critical Equipment,

    Shipboard and OffShipboard and Off--shore Machinery Roomsshore Machinery Rooms

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    5/63

    How do clean agents work?How do clean agents work?

    Increasing the heat capacity of the fireIncreasing the heat capacity of the fireenvironment, resulting in increased amounts ofenvironment, resulting in increased amounts of

    energy required to raise the temperature of theenergy required to raise the temperature of the

    incoming air to the flame temperature.incoming air to the flame temperature. Displacing oxygen, resulting in reduced heatDisplacing oxygen, resulting in reduced heat

    production.production.

    Undergoing endothermic (energy absorbing)Undergoing endothermic (energy absorbing)

    decomposition reactions in the presence of thedecomposition reactions in the presence of the

    flame.flame.

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    6/63

    Setting the DesignSetting the Design

    ConcentrationConcentration

    Establish the extinguishing concentrationEstablish the extinguishing concentration-- By test: Agent and fuel specificBy test: Agent and fuel specific

    Use appropriate safety factorUse appropriate safety factor

    Include any design factorsInclude any design factors

    DC = (EC * SF) + DFDC = (EC * SF) + DF

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    7/63

    ExtinguishingExtinguishing

    ConcentrationConcentration

    NFPA 2001, 2000 Edition:NFPA 2001, 2000 Edition:-- Class AClass A

    UL 2127 and UL 2166UL 2127 and UL 2166

    Wood crib in 100 mWood crib in 100 m33 enclosureenclosure

    Plastic fuel array in 100 mPlastic fuel array in 100 m33 enclosureenclosure

    -- Class BClass B Cup burnerCup burner

    Confirmed for a few fuels in larger scale tests (ULConfirmed for a few fuels in larger scale tests (UL

    and IMO)and IMO)

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    8/63

    Class A TestsClass A Tests

    UL 2127 and UL 2166UL 2127 and UL 2166-- 3 types of polymeric materials (PMMA, PP,3 types of polymeric materials (PMMA, PP,

    and ABS)and ABS)

    -- Difficult plastics to extinguishDifficult plastics to extinguish

    -- 4 sheet array4 sheet array

    -- Heptane or hot surface ignitionHeptane or hot surface ignition

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    9/63

    UL Class A TestUL Class A Test

    ArrangementArrangement

    305mm

    (12")

    89mm

    (3.5

    ")

    305mm

    (12")

    951mm(37.5")

    CinderBlock

    PolycarbonateBaffles

    Load CellDrip Tray

    Channel Iron FrameCovered With SteelSheet on Top and Two Sides

    AluminumAngle Frame

    3.2mm (1/8") Allthread RodFuel Support

    381mm (15")

    254mm (10")254mm (10")

    533mm

    (21")

    76mm(3")

    127mm(5")

    851mm

    (33.5

    ")

    32mm(1")

    LoadCell

    610 mm (24")

    203mm x 406mm x 9.53mm

    (8" x 16" x ")Plastic Sheet

    a

    12mm (")

    12

    mm

    (")

    Ignitor Pan

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    10/63

    Cup Burner ApparatusCup Burner Apparatus85 2 mm85 2 mm

    ChimneyChimney

    535 25 mm535 25 mm

    235 mm235 mm

    DiffuserDiffuser

    Fuel InletFuel Inlet Air/Agent InletAir/Agent Inlet

    E ti i hi C t tiE ti i hi C t ti

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    11/63

    Extinguishing ConcentrationExtinguishing Concentration

    Differences for HeptaneDifferences for Heptane

    Agent ISO Values Other ISO Burner

    Values

    Difference

    (%)

    IG-01 (Ar) 37.5 40.8 8.8

    IG-1 (N2) 33.6 30.2 11.3

    IG-541 33.8 31.9, 30.6 10.4

    IG-55 32.3

    FC-3110 5.9 5.3 11.3

    HFC-23 12 12.3 2.5

    HFC-227ea 6.6 6.6 0

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    12/63

    Effect of RadiativeEffect of Radiative

    FeedbackFeedback

    radq.

    TTFF11 (Bulk)(Bulk)

    radq.

    TTFF22(Bulk)(Bulk)

    TTFF22> T> TFF11

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    13/63

    ExtinguishingExtinguishing

    Concentration SummaryConcentration Summary

    Extinguishing concentration determined by testExtinguishing concentration determined by test-- Variability in testingVariability in testing

    Radiative feedback may affect extinguishingRadiative feedback may affect extinguishing

    concentrationconcentration-- LongLongpreburnpreburn timestimes

    -- Metal surfacesMetal surfaces

    Designer must determine how hazard relates to theDesigner must determine how hazard relates to the

    method for determining the extinguishingmethod for determining the extinguishing

    concentrationconcentration

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    14/63

    Safety FactorsSafety Factors

    NFPA 2001, 2000 EditionNFPA 2001, 2000 Edition-- 30%30%Class B, Manually activatedClass B, Manually activated

    -- 20%20%Class AClass A

    -- 10%10%InertingInerting

    -- Design FactorsDesign Factors

    ISO 14520, First Edition (August 2000):ISO 14520, First Edition (August 2000):-- 30%30%Class A and BClass A and B

    -- 10%10%InertingInerting

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    15/63

    Safety FactorsSafety Factors

    Design deficienciesDesign deficiencies Installation deficienciesInstallation deficiencies

    Uncertainty in extinguishing concentrationUncertainty in extinguishing concentration Special conditionsSpecial conditions

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    16/63

    Design FactorsDesign Factors

    Additional quantity of agentAdditional quantity of agent Intent is to increase system reliabilityIntent is to increase system reliability

    Account for specific conditionAccount for specific condition-- Number of teesNumber of tees-- Enclosure pressureEnclosure pressure

    -- Unclosable openingsUnclosable openings-- Enclosure and fuel geometryEnclosure and fuel geometry

    -- ObstructionsObstructions

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    17/63

    Prediction AccuracyPrediction Accuracy

    Halocarbons (UL 2166)Halocarbons (UL 2166)

    -- Mass 10% withMass 10% with

    standard deviation lessstandard deviation less

    than 5than 5

    -- Discharge time 1Discharge time 1

    secondsecond

    -- Nozzle pressure 10%

    Inert Gases (UL 2127)Inert Gases (UL 2127)

    -- Volume of agent 10%Volume of agent 10%

    with standard deviationwith standard deviation

    less than 5less than 5

    -- Discharge time 10Discharge time 10

    secondsseconds

    -- Nozzle pressure 10%Nozzle pressure 10% Nozzle pressure 10%

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    18/63

    Tee Design FactorTee Design Factor

    For systems protecting multiple hazardsFor systems protecting multiple hazards For each hazardFor each hazard

    -- Start at point where pipe system enters theStart at point where pipe system enters the

    hazard and count the number of tees in the flowhazard and count the number of tees in the flow

    path back to the agent supplypath back to the agent supply

    -- also include any tee in the hazard that suppliesalso include any tee in the hazard that suppliesagent to another hazardagent to another hazard

    -- do not include manifold teesdo not include manifold tees

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    19/63

    Tee Design Factor (cont.)Tee Design Factor (cont.)

    Use the hazard with the highest tee countUse the hazard with the highest tee count Not necessary if system passes a dischargeNot necessary if system passes a discharge

    testtest

    P b bilit Di t ib ti fP b bilit Di t ib ti f

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    20/63

    Probability Distribution forProbability Distribution for

    Agent Mass for 2 to 20 TeesAgent Mass for 2 to 20 Tees

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45

    Normalized Mass

    RelativeProbability

    Experiment Standard Deviat ion = 0.0304

    2 Tees2 Tees

    20 Tees20 Tees

    4 Tees4 Tees

    Calculated Agent QuantityCalculated Agent Quantity

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    21/63

    Calculated Agent QuantityCalculated Agent Quantity

    Probability Distribution:Probability Distribution:

    A System with 8 Tees (Std. Dev. = 0.0608)A System with 8 Tees (Std. Dev. = 0.0608)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30

    Measured Agent Quantity (normalized by the predicted agent quantity)

    RelativeP

    robability

    99%

    1%

    WithoutWithout

    Additional AgentAdditional Agent

    WithWith

    Additional AgentAdditional Agent

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    22/63

    DESIGN FACTOR

    TEE COUNT

    HALOCARBON

    DESIGN FACTOR

    INERT GAS DESIGN

    FACTOR

    0-4 0.00 0.00

    5 0.01 0.00

    6 0.02 0.00

    7 0.03 0.00

    8 0.04 0.00

    9 0.05 0.01

    10 0.06 0.01

    11 0.07 0.02

    12 0.07 0.02

    13 0.08 0.03

    Design Factor for TeesDesign Factor for Tees

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    23/63

    ExampleExample

    Hazard 2Hazard 2

    Hazard 1Hazard 1

    Tee count of 8 teesTee count of 8 tees

    for Hazard 2for Hazard 2 4%4%

    additional agentadditional agent

    requiredrequired

    Alternate layout toAlternate layout to

    reduce tee count to 4reduce tee count to 4teestees no additionalno additional

    agent required.agent required.

    Hazard 1Hazard 1

    Hazard 2Hazard 2

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    24/63

    Enclosure Pressure DesignEnclosure Pressure Design

    FactorFactor

    Agent quantity must be adjusted if ambientAgent quantity must be adjusted if ambientenclosure pressure varies by more than 11enclosure pressure varies by more than 11

    percent from standard sea level pressurespercent from standard sea level pressures

    Pressure may be affected by factors otherPressure may be affected by factors other

    than elevationthan elevation

    -- Hyperbaric chambers, mines, facilities whereHyperbaric chambers, mines, facilities whereventilation fans are used to create artificiallyventilation fans are used to create artificially

    higher or lower pressureshigher or lower pressures

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    25/63

    Additional Design FactorsAdditional Design Factors

    Unclosable openingsUnclosable openings

    -- Compensate by adding agent and extending dischargeCompensate by adding agent and extending discharge

    timetime

    Enclosure and fuel geometryEnclosure and fuel geometry-- Unusual geometries are typically addressed throughUnusual geometries are typically addressed through

    nozzle placement and additional agentnozzle placement and additional agent

    -- FullFull--scale machinery space tests showed that for a largescale machinery space tests showed that for a largeenclosure with a complex obstructed geometry, agentenclosure with a complex obstructed geometry, agent

    concentrations varied 20% in the enclosureconcentrations varied 20% in the enclosure

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    26/63

    Additional Design FactorsAdditional Design Factors

    ObstructionsObstructions-- Obstructions such as ducts, cables, lightObstructions such as ducts, cables, light

    fixtures, etc. can block or impede agentfixtures, etc. can block or impede agent

    discharge which can affect mixingdischarge which can affect mixing-- Address with nozzle placement and/orAddress with nozzle placement and/or

    additional agentadditional agent

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    27/63

    Concentration/ExposureConcentration/Exposure

    LimitsLimits

    All efforts are made to avoid anyAll efforts are made to avoid anyunnecessary exposureunnecessary exposure

    -- Time delays allow for egress from areaTime delays allow for egress from area

    -- Warning signals inside and outside of enclosureWarning signals inside and outside of enclosure

    indicate system activationindicate system activation

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    28/63

    Concentration/ExposureConcentration/Exposure

    LimitsLimits

    For halocarbons, maximum safe exposureFor halocarbons, maximum safe exposurelimit determined by cardiac sensitizationlimit determined by cardiac sensitization

    -- Determined by testing with dogs stressed withDetermined by testing with dogs stressed with

    adrenalineadrenaline-- NOAELNOAEL --No Observable Adverse Effect LevelNo Observable Adverse Effect Level

    -- LOAELLOAEL -- Lowest Observable Adverse Effect LevelLowest Observable Adverse Effect Level

    -- PBPKPBPK -- PhysiologicallyPhysiologically--Based Pharmacokinetic, modelBased Pharmacokinetic, modelused to account for rate of uptake of agent into theused to account for rate of uptake of agent into the

    blood streamblood stream

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    29/63

    Concentration/ExposureConcentration/Exposure

    LimitsLimits

    For inert gases, maximum safe exposureFor inert gases, maximum safe exposurelimit determined by oxygen displacementlimit determined by oxygen displacement

    -- Oxygen concentration of 12% by volume approximatesOxygen concentration of 12% by volume approximates

    NOAEL type significanceNOAEL type significance-- Oxygen concentration of 10% by volume approximatesOxygen concentration of 10% by volume approximates

    LOAEL type significanceLOAEL type significance

    -- The PBPK model does not apply to inert gasesThe PBPK model does not apply to inert gases

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    30/63

    Maximum ConcentrationsMaximum Concentrations

    Normally occupied enclosuresNormally occupied enclosures-- Halocarbon agentsHalocarbon agents

    Up to NOAELUp to NOAEL

    Up to LOAEL with means to limit exposure to timeUp to LOAEL with means to limit exposure to timelimits from PBPK modellimits from PBPK model

    -- Inert gasesInert gases

    Up to 43% (12% oxygen) with means to limitUp to 43% (12% oxygen) with means to limit

    exposure to 5 minutesexposure to 5 minutes

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    31/63

    Maximum ConcentrationsMaximum Concentrations

    Normally unoccupied enclosuresNormally unoccupied enclosures-- Halocarbon agentsHalocarbon agents

    Up to 24% (16% oxygen) with means to limitUp to 24% (16% oxygen) with means to limit

    exposure to time limits from PBPK modelexposure to time limits from PBPK model

    -- Inert gasesInert gases

    Up to 52% (10% oxygen) with means to limitUp to 52% (10% oxygen) with means to limit

    exposure to 3 minutesexposure to 3 minutes

    Up to 62% (8% oxygen) with means to limitUp to 62% (8% oxygen) with means to limit

    exposure to 30 secondsexposure to 30 seconds

    What is the Purpose of FlowWhat is the Purpose of Flow

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    32/63

    What is the Purpose of FlowWhat is the Purpose of Flow

    Calculation Software?Calculation Software? Predict system discharge performance for designPredict system discharge performance for design

    purposespurposes-- Discharge time, nozzle pressure, nozzle agent quantityDischarge time, nozzle pressure, nozzle agent quantity

    -- Generally, systems are not discharge testedGenerally, systems are not discharge tested

    Insure system meets criteriaInsure system meets criteria-- NFPA 2001, Listing or approvalNFPA 2001, Listing or approval

    -- AHJ, OEMAHJ, OEM

    Software is a toolSoftware is a tool

    S l S tS l S t

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    33/63

    Sample SystemSample System

    P t ti f MiP t ti f Mi

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    34/63

    Protection from MisuseProtection from Misuse

    Initial listing/approval and followInitial listing/approval and follow--up serviceup service

    Acceptable hardware built inAcceptable hardware built in Error and Warning messagesError and Warning messages

    Trained and competent userTrained and competent user Review of the designReview of the design

    --

    AHJ/InsuranceAHJ/Insurance

    -- OwnerOwner

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    35/63

    Additional FeaturesAdditional Features

    Export pipe layout to Cad packagesExport pipe layout to Cad packages

    Ability to lock diameter for individual pipeAbility to lock diameter for individual pipe

    segmentssegments

    -- Particularly helpful with retrofitsParticularly helpful with retrofits

    Design specific helpDesign specific help

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    36/63

    Verification of FlowVerification of Flow

    Calculation MethodCalculation Method

    Series of discharge tests conducted to verifySeries of discharge tests conducted to verify

    predictionspredictions

    Tests also establish other system limitsTests also establish other system limits

    -- minimum and maximum orifice area ratiosminimum and maximum orifice area ratios-- tee types, orientations, and split ratiostee types, orientations, and split ratios

    -- maximum arrival time imbalancemaximum arrival time imbalance

    -- maximummaximum runoutrunout time imbalancetime imbalance

    -- maximum pipe volume to agent liquid/cylinder volumemaximum pipe volume to agent liquid/cylinder volume

    ratio (percent in pipe)ratio (percent in pipe)

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    37/63

    PrePre--Witness TestsWitness Tests

    3 and 4 nozzle tests3 and 4 nozzle tests

    Each test with multiple limits includedEach test with multiple limits included

    All limits hit at least onceAll limits hit at least once

    Submittal package put togetherSubmittal package put together

    -- software outputsoftware output

    -- asas--built drawingsbuilt drawings-- experimental dataexperimental data

    All tests must pass criteriaAll tests must pass criteria

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    38/63

    Witness TestsWitness Tests

    UL/FM presentUL/FM present

    2 of the pre2 of the pre--witness tests chosenwitness tests chosen

    -- ReRe--run the tests, results must be acceptablerun the tests, results must be acceptable

    At least three new blind tests are runAt least three new blind tests are run-- The limits for a test are chosenThe limits for a test are chosen

    -- The test is laid out on the computerThe test is laid out on the computer-- The system is constructed and the test runThe system is constructed and the test run

    -- All tests must pass criteriaAll tests must pass criteria

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    39/63

    Limits for a Witness TestLimits for a Witness Test

    Minimum fill densityMinimum fill density

    Maximum discharge timeMaximum discharge time

    Maximum run out time imbalanceMaximum run out time imbalance

    Minimum pipe flowrateMinimum pipe flowrate

    Minimum nozzle area ratioMinimum nozzle area ratio

    50:50 bull tee50:50 bull tee

    85:15 side tee85:15 side tee

    P t E ti i h t

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    40/63

    PostPost--ExtinguishmentExtinguishment

    Enclosure EnvironmentEnclosure Environment

    Thermal Decomposition ProductsThermal Decomposition Products

    -- For Halocarbon Agents, Halon 1301, FMFor Halocarbon Agents, Halon 1301, FM--200,200,

    FEFE--25, and FE25, and FE--13, production of HF is the13, production of HF is the

    primary concern.primary concern.-- For Inert Gas Agents, IGFor Inert Gas Agents, IG--100, IG100, IG--01, IG01, IG--55,55,

    IGIG--541 and CO2, there are no thermal541 and CO2, there are no thermal

    decomposition products formed.decomposition products formed.

    P tP t E ti i h tE ti i h t

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    41/63

    PostPost--ExtinguishmentExtinguishment

    Enclosure EnvironmentEnclosure Environment-- Resulting TDP concentration is dependentResulting TDP concentration is dependent

    upon:upon:

    Fire Size to Enclosure Volume Ratio.Fire Size to Enclosure Volume Ratio.

    Discharge Time.Discharge Time. Safety Factor (Utilizing higher than minimumSafety Factor (Utilizing higher than minimum

    concentration can reduce amount formed).concentration can reduce amount formed).

    E.W.Forssell, et al, An Evaluation of the International Maritime Organizations Gaseous Agent Test Protocol,

    Fire Technology, 2001

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    42/63

    Fire Size to Room Volume Ratio (kW/m3)

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

    HFConcentra

    tion(ppm)

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    Approximate HF Production Correlation

    (5%)(12 %) Ansul (12 %) NAFGT

    (7%)

    (8.5%) (9%)

    (8.6%) K-F (8.6%) M/S-F

    (8.6%) Chemetron

    (3.7%)

    (7.9%)

    (6.2%)

    (14.4%)

    (6.2%)

    (7.9%)

    (14.4%)

    (7.2%)

    (13.2%)(5%)

    (7.0%)

    (6.0%)

    (16%)

    Agent

    Halon 1301NAF-SIII

    CEA-410

    CEA-308

    FM-200

    FE-13

    IMO Protocol (500 m3) (1.2 m

    3) (28 m

    3)

    NASAUSCG (526 m

    3)

    (8.8%)

    (5%)

    (7.6%)

    (12%)

    NRC (121 m3)

    gy

    P tP t E ti i h tE ti i h t

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    43/63

    PostPost--ExtinguishmentExtinguishment

    Enclosure EnvironmentEnclosure Environment-- Primarily hazard is to personnel as equipment isPrimarily hazard is to personnel as equipment is

    generally more tolerant than humans to exposuresgenerally more tolerant than humans to exposures

    -- Dangerous Toxic Loading,Dangerous Toxic Loading, DTLHumanDTLHuman, representing, representing

    the threshold for life threatening exposures estimatedthe threshold for life threatening exposures estimated

    byby MeldrumMeldrum as 12,000as 12,000ppmppm--minutes or an exposure tominutes or an exposure to12001200ppmppm HF for 10 minutes.HF for 10 minutes.

    MeldrumMeldrum, M., Toxicology of Substances in Relation to Major, M., Toxicology of Substances in Relation to Major

    Hazards: Hydrogen Fluoride, Health and Safety ExecutiveHazards: Hydrogen Fluoride, Health and Safety Executive(HSE) Information Centre, Sheffield S37HQ, England, 1993.(HSE) Information Centre, Sheffield S37HQ, England, 1993.

    -- Early detection and fast suppression key to limitingEarly detection and fast suppression key to limiting

    effects.effects.

    H a z a r d a s s e s s m e n t o f H F c o n c e n t ra t io n s

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    44/63

    d u r in g G L C C E D P t e s tin g

    E x p o s u r e T im e ( m in )

    0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0

    Average

    HFConcentration(ppm

    )

    0

    1 0 0 0

    2 0 0 0

    3 0 0 0

    4 0 0 0

    5 0 0 0

    M a g T a p e ( c )M a g T a p e ( o )

    P a p e r ( T L )

    P a p e r ( B L )

    C ir c u i t B o a r d

    W ir e /n - H e p t a n e

    L C5 0

    G u i n e a P ig

    R a t

    R a t

    R a t

    M o n k e y

    R a t

    M o u s e

    E s t im a t e d L C 5 0 , M a m m a l

    E s t im a te d D T L , H u m a n

    [ H u g h e s A s s o c ia t e s , I n c ., "H a z a r d A s s e s s m e n t o f T h e r m a l D e c o m p o s it io n P r o d u c ts o f F M - 2 0 0T M

    in E l e c tr o n i c s a n d D a t a P r o c e s s i n g F a c i li ti e s ", H u g h e s A s s o c i a te s , I n c . , 1 9 9 5 ]

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    45/63

    Agent RetentionAgent Retention Allows for time to deal with persistentAllows for time to deal with persistent

    ignition sources and for hot surfaces to coolignition sources and for hot surfaces to cooldown. Particularly important whendown. Particularly important when

    automatic shutdown is not part of activationautomatic shutdown is not part of activationsequence.sequence.

    Common cause of discharge test failures.Common cause of discharge test failures.

    No hard answer for how long is enoughNo hard answer for how long is enough(case by case).(case by case).

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    46/63

    Agent RetentionAgent RetentionThe time, T, for the interface to descend to anyThe time, T, for the interface to descend to any

    level, H, in the enclosure, is:level, H, in the enclosure, is:

    T=2AT=2Aenclencl[(K[(K33HHenclencl))0.50.5--(K(K33H)H)0.50.5]/K]/K33FFAACCDDAALeakLeak

    wherewhere

    KK33=2g(p=2g(pmixmix--ppairair)/[p)/[pmixmix+p+pairair(F(FAA/(1.0/(1.0--FFAA))]))]

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    47/63

    Agent RetentionAgent Retention

    Agent retention or holding time usuallyAgent retention or holding time usually

    based upon final interface height equal tobased upon final interface height equal to

    highest (lowest for nitrogen) combustiblehighest (lowest for nitrogen) combustible

    material in enclosure.material in enclosure.

    Agent Retention Time in 10x10x10 ft Enclosure

    with FA=0.5, Highest Combustible at 7.5 ft or

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    48/63

    g

    Lowest Combustible at 2.5 ft for Nitrogen

    Leakage Area (ft2)

    0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00

    AgentRetentionTime(minutes)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20 5% Halon 13018.7% FM-200

    16.8% FE-13

    11.7% FE-25

    40.3% Inergen (IG-541)

    54.6% Argon (IG-01)

    45.5% Argonite (IG-55)

    36.4% CO240.3% Nitrogen (IG-100)

    Agent Retention Time in 10x10x10 ft Enclosure

    with FA=0.5, Highest Combustible at 7.5 ft

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    49/63

    Leakage Area (ft2

    )

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

    AgentReten

    tionTime(minu

    tes)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    5% Halon 13018.7% FM-200

    16.8% FE-13

    11.7% FE-25

    40.3% Inergen (IG-541)

    54.6% Argon (IG-01)

    45.5% Argonite (IG-55)

    36.4% CO2

    40.3% Nitrogen (IG-100)

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    50/63

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

    VentingVenting

    The experienced enclosure pressureThe experienced enclosure pressure

    depends upon the following factors:depends upon the following factors:

    -- Total leakage area.Total leakage area.

    -- Design concentration.Design concentration.

    -- Rate of agent addition (discharge time).Rate of agent addition (discharge time).

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    51/63

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

    VentingVenting For agents stored as a liquid, Halon 1301,For agents stored as a liquid, Halon 1301,

    FMFM--200, FE200, FE--25, and FE25, and FE--13, the enclosure13, the enclosureundergoes two pressure pulses.undergoes two pressure pulses.

    -- The first pulse is negative and is due to theThe first pulse is negative and is due to thequick reduction in enclosure temperaturequick reduction in enclosure temperaturecaused by the vaporization of the agent in thecaused by the vaporization of the agent in the

    enclosure.enclosure.-- The second pulse is positive, caused by theThe second pulse is positive, caused by the

    volume of the added agent.volume of the added agent.

    8% FM-200TM

    Discharge with 226 cm2

    (35 in2) Leak in 85 m

    3(3000 FT

    3) Enclosure

    Enclosure Pressures

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    52/63

    8% FM-200 Discharge with 226 cm (35 in ) Leak in 85 m (3000 FT ) Enclosure

    [Great Lakes Chemical Corporation, 1997]

    CylinderActuation

    NozzleLiquidRun-Out

    TotalDischarge

    Time (sec)

    15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    Pre

    ssure(iwc)

    -1.50

    -1.25

    -1.00

    -0.75

    -0.50

    -0.25

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    Pre

    ssure(Pa)

    -350

    -300

    -250

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -500

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    Leakage Area per Enclosure Volume (in2/ft

    3)

    0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.015

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    53/63

    Enclosure Pressures During FM-200TM

    Testing

    [M. Robin, "Investigation of the Pressure Dynam ics of FM-200 System Discharges",Presented at 1997 Halon Options Technical W orking Conference, Albuquerque, NM, May 1997]

    En

    closurePressure

    (iwc)

    -3.0

    -2.5

    -2.0

    -1.5

    -1.0

    -0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    EnclosurePressure

    (Pa)

    -700

    -600

    -500

    -400

    -300

    -200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    Leakage Area per Enclosure Volume (cm2/m

    3)

    1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3

    7% Cinder Block

    8% Cinder Block

    9% Cinder Block

    7% Gypsum

    8% Gypsum

    9% Gypsum

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    54/63

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

    VentingVenting

    For agents stored as a compressed vapor,For agents stored as a compressed vapor,

    IGIG--01, IG01, IG--100, IG100, IG--55, IG55, IG--541, the541, the

    enclosure undergoes a single pressure pulse.enclosure undergoes a single pressure pulse.

    -- Maximum enclosure pressure corresponding toMaximum enclosure pressure corresponding tothe maximum rate of agent addition.the maximum rate of agent addition.

    -- Easier to predict as the significance of the heatEasier to predict as the significance of the heat

    transfer from the compartment boundaries istransfer from the compartment boundaries is

    reduced.reduced.

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    55/63

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

    VentingVenting With detailed flow predictions andWith detailed flow predictions and

    enclosure details, the experienced enclosureenclosure details, the experienced enclosure

    pressure can be predicted with anpressure can be predicted with an

    appropriate equation of state.appropriate equation of state.

    System Pressures

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    56/63

    Time (sec)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

    Pressure(psig)

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200

    Exp-Manifold

    Exp-Nozzle

    Pred-Cylinder

    Pred-Node1

    Pred-Manifold

    Pred-Nozzle

    Enclosure Pressure

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    57/63

    Time (sec)

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Enclosur

    ePressure(iwc

    )

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    Measured

    Predicted

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    58/63

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

    VentingVenting Without detailed flow predictions, theWithout detailed flow predictions, the

    enclosure pressure can be found from anenclosure pressure can be found from an

    orifice equation and an assumptionorifice equation and an assumption

    regarding the peak agent flow rate.regarding the peak agent flow rate. DPDPenclencl=[Q=[Qagent,maxagent,max/(CdA/(CdALeakLeak(2g/p(2g/pmixmixg)g)

    0.50.5)])]22

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    59/63

    Enclosure Pressure andEnclosure Pressure and

    VentingVenting Enclosure StrengthEnclosure Strength

    -- Varies with type of construction, but is lessVaries with type of construction, but is less

    than you might think. 2than you might think. 2 iwciwc (500 Pa) is a(500 Pa) is a

    conservative value.conservative value.-- Venting is required if developed pressure isVenting is required if developed pressure is

    greater than what can be tolerated.greater than what can be tolerated.

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    60/63

    SummarySummary Extinguishing concentrations are determined byExtinguishing concentrations are determined by

    test and are agent and fuel specific. Need totest and are agent and fuel specific. Need tounderstand how protected hazard relates to testunderstand how protected hazard relates to test

    fuels.fuels.

    2000 edition of NFPA 2001 includes an increased2000 edition of NFPA 2001 includes an increased

    safety factor (30%) for Class B and manuallysafety factor (30%) for Class B and manually

    activated systems.activated systems. ISO 14520 requires a 30% safety factor for ClassISO 14520 requires a 30% safety factor for Class

    A and B hazards.A and B hazards.

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    61/63

    SummarySummary For some systems/applications the minimumFor some systems/applications the minimum

    safety factor may not be appropriate. Thesafety factor may not be appropriate. Thedesigner must understand and account for thedesigner must understand and account for theissues that affect system reliability.issues that affect system reliability.

    NFPA 2001 allows halocarbon concentrationsNFPA 2001 allows halocarbon concentrationsabove the NOAEL if means are provided to limitabove the NOAEL if means are provided to limitthe exposure time to those determined using thethe exposure time to those determined using the

    PBPK model.PBPK model. Software that has been thoroughly tested andSoftware that has been thoroughly tested and

    validated is essential.validated is essential.

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    62/63

    SummarySummary Early detection and fast suppression are the key toEarly detection and fast suppression are the key to

    limiting production of thermal decompositionlimiting production of thermal decompositionproducts.products.

    Agent retention time is dependent on agentAgent retention time is dependent on agent

    concentration, total leakage area, and leakconcentration, total leakage area, and leakdistribution.distribution.

    There is no hard answer for how long the retentionThere is no hard answer for how long the retention

    time needs to be.time needs to be.

  • 8/9/2019 Clean Agent System Designs

    63/63

    SummarySummary Developed enclosure pressures depend on theDeveloped enclosure pressures depend on the

    agent, design concentration, leakage area, andagent, design concentration, leakage area, anddischarge time.discharge time.

    Venting is required if the developed pressureVenting is required if the developed pressure

    exceeds the enclosure strength.exceeds the enclosure strength.