classroom management of a child with apd

38
By: Dr. Rebecca Lowe, Kate Tucker, Sara Gammill, Tyler Russell, Randa Walls C lassroom M anagement of a Child with Auditory P rocessing D isorder

Upload: kjmagnon

Post on 15-Jul-2015

166 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

By: Dr. Rebecca Lowe, Kate Tucker, Sara

Gammill, Tyler Russell, Randa Walls

Classroom Management of a Child with

Auditory Processing Disorder

WHAT IS MEANT BY AUDITORY

PROCESSING?

Katz, Stecker & Henderson (1992)

described central auditory processing as

"what we do with what we hear.“

ASHA 2005 TECH REPORT=

AUDITORY PROCESSING

(C) Auditory Processing = refers to the efficiency and effectiveness by which

the central nervous system utilizes auditory information.

How well the brain can process incoming auditory information.

ASHA’S

DEFINITION:

ASHA defines the Central auditory processes as: the auditory system mechanisms and processes responsible for the following

behavioral phenomena.

Sound localization and lateralization – where the sound is located

Auditory discrimination – ability in telling speech sounds apart

Bat vs bat bat vs pat same or different

Auditory pattern recognition – long vs short, high pitch vs low pitch

Temporal aspects of audition – snowdrift vs snow drift – timing aspects

Auditory performance with competing acoustic signals – ambient noise

Auditory performance with degraded signals – auditory closure

CAPD = refers to difficulties in the processing of auditory information in the CNS demonstrated by poor performance in one or more of

the above listed skills.

AUDITORY PROCESSING

DISORDER

(C) APD = a deficit in the neural

processing of auditory stimuli that is

not due to higher-order language,

cognitive, or related factors.

Although APD may co-exist with other

disorders - it is not a result of these

disorders.

• The failure to understand spoken language in a meaningful way without what is commonly considered a hearing loss is called an auditory processing problem .

• Other terms that have been used interchangeably include: Auditory Comprehension Deficit, Central Deafness, Central Auditory Processing Disorder, Word Deafness, and Auditory Perceptual Processing Dysfunction.

(Massaro, 1975; Kamhi, 2011; Understanding auditory, 2014)

Another way to explain….

• Myth #1: Auditory processing disorder is the same thing as being hard of

hearing. Fact: Most people with APD have no hearing loss. Speaking

loudly to them won’t help them understand what you’ve said.

• Myth #2: Auditory processing disorder is uncommon. Fact: Although

there is little research about APD, more is needed to determine how

common APD is.

• Myth #3: People with auditory processing disorder are not as intelligent

than their typically developing peers. Fact: Children with APD may score

lower on verbal IQ tests than their peers do, but does not mean that they

are not intelligent.

(Kamhia, 2011; Keith, 1981)

5 MYTHS ABOUT APD:

• Myth #4: Auditory processing disorder is another name for ADHD. Fact:

People with APD and ADHD may show similar symptoms, including being

easily distracted and inattentive. Many children diagnosed with APD may

also be diagnosed with ADHD.

• Myth #5: Children with auditory processing disorder are lazy and appear to

be rude. Fact: Kids with APD may appear to be ignoring others. Their

difficulty processing auditory information causes this behavior.

(Kamhia, 2011; Keith, 1981)

5 MYTHS ABOUT APD

CONTINUED:

“Ok, class, before you line up to go outside for recess, take your

homework out, and put it on your desk, then hang your backpack

up and line up in alphabetical order.

Bob hung his backpack up and was first in line.

EXAMPLE OF AUDITORY

PROCESSING DISORDER:

• Recurrent ear infections

• Middle ear fluid

• Pregnancy complications

• Labor and delivery complications

• Genetics

• Birth defects

• Lead, mercury and other environmental poisons and toxins

(Medwetsky, 2011; Witton, 2010)

POSSIBLE CAUSES OF APD:

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE

BEHAVIORAL

MANIFESTATIONS OF APD?

(BARAN, 2000)

Difficulty hearing in noisy situations or with competing messages

Difficulty following long conversations or lectures

Misunderstanding messages

Difficulty hearing conversations on the telephone

Difficulty learning a foreign language or challenging vocabulary words (or understanding foreigners’ accents)

Difficulty remembering spoken information (i.e., auditory memory deficits)

Difficulty taking notes

Difficulty following multi-step directions

Difficulty in directing, sustaining, or dividing auditory attention

Difficulty processing nonverbal information (e.g., poor musical and singing skills)

Difficulty learning songs, nursery rhymes

Sometimes have difficulty with reading, spelling and learning problems

SOME ACADEMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF

CHILDREN WHO HAVE APD?

APD may indirectly lead to academic difficulty that manifests with some of the following characteristics.

Baran (1999) identifies the following:

Poor expressive and receptive language abilities

Poor reading, writing, and spelling

Poor phonics and speech sound discrimination

Difficulty taking notes

Difficulty learning foreign languages

Weak short-term memory

Behavioral, psychological, and/or social problems resulting from poor language understanding and poor academic skills.

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iabuAiYZVxI

IDENTIFYING SYMPTOMS OF APD:

• Phonemes

• Rhyming

• Decoding words

• Poor auditory memory

(Medwetsky, 2001; Fey et al., 2012)

PROCESSING PROBLEMS THAT

MAY OCCUR:

• 1st Grade: When children are not learning letter-sound correspondence

• 4th Grade: When reading, writing, and lecture become more advanced and

less contextual (no pictures)

• 7th Grade: When reading and writing become less narrative (1sr person).

(Bellis, 1996)

TYPICAL GRADE LEVELS WHEN

AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER IS

IDENTIFIED:

• Children spend 45-60% of their day focused on listening, much of that

time in school.

• Classrooms are often noisy places, and children often have a harder time

than adults hearing speech in these noisy environments

• Proper intervention is necessary.

(Sirimanna, 2011; Bellis, 1996; Keith, 1981)

INTERVENTION NEEDED:

http://youtu.be/6F6fVGg7LLg

VIDEO FOR ONE INTERVENTION

SESSION OF APD:

• Students with a language or auditory processing disorder (APD) react to

changes in their environment differently.

• No two students have exactly the same deficits.

(Paul, 2008; Cacace & McFarland, 1998)

FACTS ABOUT APD:

• Allow for a longer response time

• Maintain a routine

• Write information on the board

• Use a cue word

• Maintain eye contact

• Repeat important information

• Use visual aids

• Encourage questions

(Kamhia, 2011; Walker et al., 2011; ASHA, 2004a)

ACCOMMODATE THE

ENVIRONMENT

• Preferential Seating: Seating the child in the front of the class is where he/she will have better visual reception of the area, which is where most teaching takes place.

• Reduce Background Noise: Make every effort to reduce and/or eliminate extraneous noise.

• Consider Your Distance: When an APD child is spoken to from a great distance (more than 5 feet), he/she will have difficulty comprehending what is said.

(Kamhia, 2011; Walker et al., 2011; Bellis, 2003)

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR SEATING

FOR STUDENTS WITH APD:

• Children with APD should be seated where they can see the teacher

without any difficulties and they are away from any distractions or noise.

• Everyone hears and understands better if you can see the speaker’s face.

• Being able to see the speaker is critical for the child with virtually any type

of APD.

• Do not assume the best seat in the class is always the front row.

(Kamhia, 2011; Walker et al., 2011; Bellis, 2003)

MODIFICATIONS FOR SEATING

CONTINUED:

• Reduce external visual and auditory distractions.

• A large display of posters or cluttered bulletin boards can be distracting.

• A study corral in the room may help.

• Ear plugs may be useful for distracting noise from a heater or air

conditioner, the pencil sharpener, or talking in the hallways.

(Kamhia, 2011; Fey et al., 2012; Walker et al., 2011)

MODIFICATIONS FOR SETTING:

• Consider The Acoustics: If the room has tiled floor and unfinished walls, there is a high probability a lot of echo will occur within the room.

• Obtain visual attention: Get eye contact from a APD child before talking to him/her. This can be done by simply touching him/her on the shoulder or using an auditory prompt (ie. Saying his/her name).

• Slow down speech: Too much information too quickly is difficult for a APD child to comprehend. State one idea at a time, and then pause so he/she can process the information, and then move onto the next idea.

• Make the child responsible for understanding: Encourage him to repeat back what he has heard to make certain he understands. Don’t embarrass him by having him prove it in front of the class, do it in a sidebar one-on-one .

(Kamhia, 2011; Walker et al., 2011)

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR

SETTING:

• Think before criticizing: If the child does not respond, or his/her response

is inappropriate, consider that he/she did not understand what you said.

• Simplify directions: Break multi-step directions into one or two parts

before proceeding to the next part of the directions.

• Provide additional written or visual material: Simple words and visual cues

that give him/her an idea of directions will help him/her keep up.

• Consider sensory issues

(Kamhia, 2011; Walker et al., 2011)

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR

SETTING CONTINUED:

• An FM system is a broadcast-type device that assists in filtering out background noise and delivering clearer spoken speech to the student.

• Personal FM systems, with a student wearing an earpiece and the teacher wearing a headpiece microphone, can be more effective in improving the sound-to-noise ratio and making it easier for a student to not miss any information.

(Johnston et al., 2009; ASHA 2002b; Rosenberg, 2002)

CONSIDER A FM SYSTEM:

• Gain the child’s attention before giving directions

• Speak slowly and clearly, but do not over exaggerate speech.

• Use simple, brief directions. Give directions in a logical, time-ordered

sequence.

• Use words that make the sequence clear, such as first, next, finally.

• Use visual aids and write instructions to supplement spoken information

(Bellis, 1996; Walker et al., 2011; Crandell & Smaldino, 2001)

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR

SPEAKING:

• Use mnemonics

• Repeat or rephrase information to your child

• Use graphic organizers

• Play games

• Listen to nature sounds and identify their location

• Learn to play the piano

• Teach active listening and whole body listening skills

(Sirimanna, 2011; Fredrick et al., 2012; Katz, 1983)

TIPS AND TECHNIQUES:

• Allow a “buddy system” that the child can use to check on homework

assignments or other instructions.

• Consider the use of tape recorders for some children who need a

repetition of directions, spelling words, or lectures.

• Provide pre-printed lecture notes or outlines to help the child listen

• Headphones help block out background noise that may interfere with the

brain processing information.

• Give children a tool to work out problems easily without the hassle of

pencils, paper and erasers.

(Sirimanna, 2011; Fredrick et al., 2012)

TIPS AND TECHNIQUES:

• Children with Auditory Processing Disorders have difficulties

distinguishing the sounds or phonemes in spoken words, especially those

in complex words and sentences.

• Children will not only have difficulty hearing the differences between

words that sound alike (think, thing, sink, thin), but they can also have

difficulty understanding the connections between those words and the

letters used to represent them.

• This is why children with Auditory Processing Difficulties often have

trouble with reading and spelling. Since they cannot hear the sound

distinctions between words, the rules linking sounds to letters and letter

groups can be hard for them to master.

(Chermak, Hall & Musiek, 1999; Walker et al., 2011; Jutras et al., 2007)

HOW DOES AUDITORY PROCESSING

AFFECT MY CHILD’S LEARNING?

• difficulties remembering information given

• language development

• comprehension

(Chermak, Hall & Musiek, 1999; Fredrick et al., 2012; Walker et al., 2011; Jutras et al., 2007)

HOW DOES AUDITORY PROCESSING

AFFECT A CHILD’S LEARNING?

CONTINUED

• Though a child with APD struggles with auditory processing, they often thrive when information is presented visually.

• Computer based education works well for APD students

Strong interactive graphics do two things:

1. Adds the 'glue' so that information sticks and

2. Allows children with APD to work independently

so they begin to build self confidence.

(Chermak, Hall & Musiek, 1999; Fredrick et al., 2012; Jutras et al., 2007)

HOW DO YOU TEACH A CHILD

WITH APD MOST EFFECTIVELY?

• Problems in the future with employment and education (Ebbels, 2014)

• Reduced communication function in social situations (Johnston et. al, 2009).

• Because of academic difficulties in adolescent population being overlooked, Speech-

Language Pathologist should help teachers and staff identify the difference between

poor academic performance and APD (Heine & Slone, 2008).

IMPACT ON CHILD WITH APD IF

NOT IMPLEMENTED:

• Sounds At Home- $6.99

• Auditory Memory Ride- $19.99

• School of Multiple Step Directions- $18.99

• Keyword Understanding-$8.99

• Storybuilder for IPad-$7.99

IPAD APPS FOR APD:

• 100% Listening

• 50 Quick Play Listening Games

• The Auditory Processing Game

• Barnaby’s Burrow-Auditory Processing Game

GAMES FOR CHILDREN WITH

APD:

Only an Audiologist can make a diagnosis of APD.

There is no one specific treatment approach for all children with APD.

Just because a child has APD does not mean they will exhibit learning, language, or communication deficits.

(Understanding auditory, 2014)

KEY POINTS TO CONSIDER

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2002b). Guidelines for fitting and monitoring FM systems. Rockville, MD: Author.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2004a). Guidelines for addressing acoustics in educational settings. Rockville, MD: Author.

Bellis, T. J. (1996). Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: From science to practice. Singular Publishing.

Bellis, T. J. (2003). Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: From science to practice (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Learning.

Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1998). Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged Children: A critical review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(2), 355-373.

Chermak, G. D., Hall 3rd, J. W., & Musiek, F. E. (1999). Differential diagnosis and management of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10(6), 289-303.

Crandell, C. & Smaldino, J. (2001). Improving classroom acoustics: Utilizing hearing-assistive technology and communication strategies in the educational setting. Classroom Acoustics: Understanding Barriers to Learning. Volta Review, 101, 47-62

Ebbels, S. (2014). Effectiveness of intervention for grammar in school-aged children with primary language impairments: A review of the evidence. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 7-40.

Fey, M. E., Kamhi, A. G., Richard, G. J., Nippold, M., & Schwarz, I. (2012). Auditory training

REFERENCES

Frederick J., G., Diedesch, A. C., Kubli, L. R., Walden, T. C., Folmer, R. L., Lewis, S., & Leek, M. R. (2012). Performance on tests of central auditory processing by individuals exposed to high-intensity blasts. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 49(7),1005-1024.

Heine, C., & Slone, M. (2008). The impact of mild central auditory processing disorder on school performance during adolescence. Journal of School Health, 78, 405-407.

Johnston, K. N., John, A. B., Kreisman, N. V., Hall III, J. W., Crandell, C. C., (2009). Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD). International Journal of Audiology, 48(6), 371-383.

Jutras, B., Loubert, M., Dupuis, J. L., Marcoux, C., Dumont, V., & Baril, M. (2007). Applicability of central auditory processing disorder models. American Journal of Audiology, 16(2), 100-106.

Katz, J. (1983). Phonemic synthesis. In E. Laskey & J. Katz (Eds.), Central auditory processing disorders: Problems of speech, langauge, and learning (pp. 269-272). Baltimore: University Park Press.

Kamhia, A. G. (2011). What speech-language pathologists need to know about auditory processing disorder. Language, Speech & Hearing Services In Schools, 42(3), 265-272.

Keith, R. W. (Ed.). (1981). Central auditory and language disorders in children . San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.

Massaro, D. (1975). Understanding Language: An information-processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Medwetsky, L. (2011). Spoken language processing model: Bridging auditory and language processing to guide assessment and intervention. Language, Speech & Hearing Services In Schools , 42(3), 286-296.

REFERENCES

Paul, R. (2008). Auditory processing disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 208-209.

Rosenberg, G. (2002). Classroom acoustics and personal FM technology in management of auditory processing disorder. Seminars in Hearing, 23(4), 309-318.

Sirimanna, T. (2011). Auditory processing disorder. Special Educational Needs: A Guide for Inclusive Practice, 82.

Understanding auditory processing disorders in children (2014). Retrieved July 20, 2014, from http://www.asha.org/public/hearing/Understanding-Auditory-Processing-Disorders-in-Children/

Walker, K. M., Brown, D. K., Scarff, C., Watson, C., Muir, P., & Phillips, D. P. (2011). Temporal processing performance, reading performance, and auditory processing disorder in learning-impaired children and controls. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, 35(1), 6-17.

Witton, C. (2010). Childhood auditory processing disorder as a developmental disorder: The case for a multi-professional approach to diagnosis and management. International Journal of Audiology, 49(2), 83-87.

REFERENCES