classical’and’recurrentnovae’are’ … · 2014. 1. 29. · !lasts about 1 year and radiates...
TRANSCRIPT
Classical and Recurrent Novae are Planetary Nebulae in Fast Forward
AND Their Ejecta are Neither Spherical
Nor Uniformly Filled Sumner Starrfield ASU Steve Shore Pisa
(no grad student or postdoc was harmed in this study-‐ yet)
Conclusions (just in case I get cut off early) 1) A nova outburst occurs in a binary system and is inherently asymmetric
2) The outburst properKes depend on the viewing angle (pole on or equatorial).
3) Most studies have assumed that Classical and Recurrent Novae ejected gases are spherical and expanding in a Hubble flow (velocity increasing with radius)
4) But high resoluKon imaging shows that the material is far from spherical. (HST, Spitzer, LBT, VLT)
5) Spectroscopic studies show that the material is probably expanding in bi-‐polar jets or flows
6) The Maximum Magnitude Rate of Decline relaKonship (MMRD) is commonly used to obtain distances to Classical (or Recurrent) Novae
7) It assumes a single relaKonship between the peak brightness and rate of decline
8) This cannot be true because there are 5 parameters that affect the properKes of the outburst.
9) Therefore, using it to get the distance to a single nova is wrong
M Lasts about 1 year and radiates ~1045 ergs M Peak Luminosity ~ LEdd exceeds LEdd in the fastest novae. M Ejects about 1028 to 1029 gm (QU Vul ejected about 1030 gm) M Ejects at speeds from ~300 km/sec to 7000 km/sec (QU Vul) M Abundances of ejected gases far from solar M Helium is always enriched M Two composition classes:
M Carbon-Oxygen Oxygen-Neon (Lots of Neon) M A Class of novae that is not ejecting any hydrogen -mostly He and C
M V445 Pup M One recent CN occurred inside a Planetary Nebula Shell
THE CLASSICAL NOVA OUTBURST Degenerate Dwarfs Behaving Badly:
Where Does the Explosion Occur?
We Follow the Light Curve:
Days
(Outburst occurs on a Grad student or Post Doc Kme scale NOT tenured professors {like PNe})
Log
Brig
htne
ss
Novae Do Not All Evolve in the Same Way:
Nova Del 2013 the 4th nova detected in γ-‐rays by FERMI/LAT No sign of dust formaKon as of November 1, 2013:
The first CO nova to be seen as a Super Soh Source (Kim Page et al.)
Kim Page et al. (Nov 1, 2013) [counts below 0.5 keV]
The Evolving Radio Remnant of RS Oph in 2006
(O’Brien, Bode et al., 2006, Nature) VLBI observaKons – O’Brien et al. 2006, Nature
Remember 1985?
Day 77
Three epochs of VLBI imaging 6 cm
18 cm
Day 13.8
Day 13.8 Day 20.5 Day 28.7
Day 28.7 Day 21.5
Expanding ring
VLBA EVN VLBA
O’Brien et al 2006
A model
Early
Late
SyntheKc images
As the source expands the overlying free-‐free absorpKon is reduced and it becomes symmetrical. O’Brien et al 2006
V1280 Sco – a deep dust forming CO Nova Chesneau et al. [not seen in soh X-‐rays]
!"#$%&'($)*+,-$./&$!"#$%&'(')* * %+* ,--.* /'0* 12345* 67"#* +%&8* 899'8(')* (89"):;* 6%* 0'* '<$'96"%+8:* =%(* #'&'(8:* ('8#%+#>* "6#*8998('+6*0("?76+'##* @('8$7"+?*ABC2.*86*D8<"DEDF5* 67'*&'(;* #:%G*'&%:E6"%+* @"+$('8#"+?* =:E<*)E("+?* 6'+*)8;#**67'+*('D8"+"+?*0("?76*86*8::*G8&':'+?67#*=%(*+%G*H*;'8(#F*8+)*67'*:8(?'*8D%E+6*%=*)E#6*$('86')2*
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
M+* ,--[5* ^OT]* 8+)* AM\MS* %0#'(&86"%+* G'('* %068"+')* 6786* ('&'8:')* 8* #6("W"+?* 0"9%:8(* +'0E:8* G7%#'*'<98+#"%+* G8#* 67'+* ('?E:8(:;* D%+"6%(')* 0'6G''+* ,--[* 8+)* ,-UU* @T7'#+'8E* '6* 8:2* #E0D"66')F2* L7'*'<98+#"%+* %=* 67'* +'0E:8* "+* 67'*D8X%(* 8<"#* )"('$6"%+* "#* -2C[V-2-CD8#* )8;YU5* 8* &8:E'* $:%#'* 67'* '#6"D86'*=(%D*AKLM*D'8#E('D'+6#2*Q;*$78+$'5*D%#6*%=*67'*08#':"+'#*E#')*=%(*67'*AKLM*%0#'(&86"%+#*G'('*$:%#':;*8:"?+')*G"67*67'*D8X%(*8<"#*)"('$6"%+2*L7'*)"D'+#"%+#*%=*67'*+'0E:8*G"::*0'*-2[C_*<*-24U_*"+*`E+2*,-UC*8+)*67'*"+$:"+86"%+*"#*9(%080:;*:8(?'2*P%#6*%=*67'*)E#6*#''D#*6%*('#")'*"+*67'*$89#*%=*67'*+'0E:85*8+)*6%*)86'*+%*$:'8(*'D"##"%+*"#*%0#'(&')*+'8(*67'*'JE86%("8:*9:8+'2*\"?+86E('#*%=*7;)(%?'+86')*$8(0%+*$%D9%E+)#*G'('*%0#'(&')*"+*67'*"+=(8(')*@\"6W%*'6*8:2*,--[F2**
*********** *
!"#$%&'()*&+&,-.-&/012345&6748&0/79"&36$704"8&04&:;4"&-<=<&,04>"2$"8&13?32@A&1"4$27?&@3;21"&@;6$271$"85.&B09C$%&DEFEB&0/79"&36$704"8&04&6;2@$&/38"&,@C32$&"GH3@;2"@5&7$&I.JK&/01234&04&:;4"&-<==.&L3$$3/%&27M&0/79".&NH%&8"134>3?>"8&,)C"@4"7;&"$&7?.&@;6/0$$"85.&
*************************************************************U*7669>NNGGG2'#%2%(?N9E0:"$N+'G#N'#%-3,,N**
A nova ejects ~10 to 100 Earth masses (1028 gm to 1029 gm)
at speeds from 300 km/sec to 7000 km/sec
GK Per (1901) V1974 Cyg (1992) DQ Her (1934)
V1974 Cyg on Day 464 (leh) and Day 723 (right) Spectra Modeled on the Boqom
V1974 Cyg taken with HST/NICMOS on 10 Feb 1998 Long axis diameter about 1”
Krauqer et al. 2002
V1974 Cyg (1992) taken with MODS on the LBT Oct 31, 2013
Long axis diameter about 5”
Wagner, Starrfield, et al. 2014, in prep
V445 Pup (2000)
It may be a SN Ia progenitor: SN Ia provide a fraction of the iron group
elements in the Solar System; And are useful in Cosmology
SN Ia show neither H or He in their spectra At any time
Ejected only H and He
Wagner and Starrfield
V445 Puppis -‐ Discovered in 2000 -‐ imaged with AcKve OpKcs
No Hydrogen detected in the ejected gases -‐ mostly helium and carbon
White Dwarf accreKng from a Hydrogen Deficient Carbon star
FH Ser HST WFPC2 imaging Gill and O’Brien MN
Nova Mon 2012: Model spectral profile on the leh: Pseudo image taken from the profile on the right
(Shore et al. 2013)
Why should you worry about the MMRD?
It is used to determine distances to single novae when it is a staKsKcal relaKonship
In fact, an important parameter is the
Viewing angle.
1995ApJ...452..704D
Della Valle and Livio
ApJ 1995
M31 and LMC Novae
Kasliwal et al. 2011: M31 and M82 Novae from the PTF
On What Do the Peak Luminosity and Rate of Decline (expansion speed) Depend?
1. The White Dwarf Mass: The higher the WD mass the smaller the amount of accreted
and ejected mass. So the expanding gases go opKcally thin more rapidly
2. The White Dwarf Luminosity: The more luminous the WD -‐ the more rapidly the accreKng material reaches the TNR: so less mass is accreted.
3. The Rate of Mass AccreKon: The higher the rate of mass accreKon, the more energy is liberated in the accreted layers and the more rapid the rise to the TNR.
4. The ComposiKon: 12C is the most reacKve of the CNO elements. ONe novae have less carbon and can accrete more material than CO novae. We also need to be concerned about mixing of accreted and WD core material. What is the composiKon of the material being transferred by the secondary?
5. The Viewing angle: Following a pole-‐on explosion will give different properKes than an edge on explosion and any inclinaKon angle in between.
ABSTRACT
HST RS Oph
Bode et al, 2007.
HST T Pyxidis
Shara et al, 1997.
(a) (c) simulation: i = 90
(b)
simulation: i = 0
10 AU
simulation: i = 0(d)
10 AU
-18
-20
log
<den
sity
gcm
-3>
This figure shows us esKmaKng the CO emission from CNe in outburst using SPH modeling and then running the results through the LIME radiaKve transfer code and the CASA simulator. These results show that the ALMA observaKons will allow us to obtain the velocity structure and improve the determinaKons of the mass of the ejected gases. Knowing the velocity and mass we can then esKmate the white dwarf mass and determine if the white dwarf is growing or losing mass as a result of the outburst.
From Shazrene Mohamed’s Talk –with thanks
Conclusions:
1. Classical and Recurrent Novae are Binaries 2. They have survived Common Envelope EvoluKon 3. There are two composiKon classes: CO and ONe 4. The shaping of the ejecta occurs almost immediately 5. The ejecta are asymmetric and their observed shape
may, in some cases, depend on how we are viewing the ejecta
6. The ejected gases start off as hot, adiabaKcally cool unKl neutral, and then are slowly ionized again by the hot White Dwarf –on Kme scales of WEEKS (not centuries)
Classical and Recurrent Nova ejecta
are neither Spherical
Nor Uniformly filled
Novae Hate Theorists