Classical music - orchestral instruments H1

3rd sem. 4th sem. total time = average contact time per week ects time ects time ects

musician

instrument/accompaniment

70/30 20 70/30 20

music theory 3 150 3 150 6 solfège

60 4 60 4

practical harmony

20 4 20 4

creator / performer

ensembles: orchestra projects* plus:

120 12 120 12

chamber music**

30

30 orchestra playing

90 3 90 3

entrepreneur

portfolio

5

5 2 project weeks

+ modules year 2:

education (introductie to education)

2 individual study activities

reseacher

music world wide

75 3 75 3

classical music history 3 75

3

total credit points per semester 6 54 60

* appr. 4 projects per year ** P: 8 lessons/H: 16 lessons of 60 minutes per year per ensemble

Generic module title Main subject year 2 Specific module title Main subject oboe year 2 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal B Main phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

Purpose of the study in the main subject is to educate the student to become a mature, musically and technically developed musician, that can function in orchestras, ensembles, as soloist or as a teacher. The student will be taught a reflective attitude and an independent study method, under the guidance of the main subject teacher and the other accompanying teachers. This will make sure the student can obtain the necessary competencies and insight. The student must prepare for the high demands of the professional practice during the end of the study. The student masters all facets of oboe. The student knows all possibilities of the instrument and has knowledge of and insight in the repertoire in its historical context. Playing the altoboe is integral part of the oboe study.

Reference competencies 1, 6, 9, 11, 21 Learning outcomes • The student is able to study and execute three etudes

• The student can play a piece by heart • The student can build reeds (basic technique) • The student is able to play thirds in a fast pace • The student can play all scales • The student can play parts of the orchestra repertoire (also for altoboe)

Coordinating department KM Contact person Maarten Dekkers Language Dutch or English Work forms • Practical group lesson

• Individual practical lesson Teacher(s) Maarten Dekkers Entrance requirements Material/literature • Etudes: Singer, Luft, Salviani

• Repertoire: Mozart: Aria, J.C. Bach: Concerti, J.S. Bach: Concerto in F, Handel: Sonate in F, Couperin: Concerts, Dutilleux: Sonate, Kalliwoda: Morceau, Poulenc: Sonate, Donizetti: altoboeconcert.

• Orkestrepertoire: Beethoven: Symfonieën, Brahms: Vioolconcert, Tchaikovsky: 4e symfonie, Bizet: Symfonie in C, Stravinsky: Pulcinella, Bartók: Concert voor Orkest, Schumann: Romanzen, Debussy: La Mer

Exam Exam Exam description Main subject oboe year 2 Semester 2 Exam form Practical exam Content of the exam Reciting 1 etude, two pieces and orchestra repertoire Exam criteria • Controling the intonation of the instrument and good technique of the pulse

• The student solves technical problems increasingly in an independent way • Technical problems are not a disturbing factor in the performance anymore • Dynamics and structure of the performance are audible • The sound must be of good quality (a root color)

Exam duration 20 minutes Weight 1 Study credits 20 Number of attempts 2 Result scale 20 point, 0,5 – 10, in halves

Generic module title General Theory subjects year 2 Specific module title KM Music-theoretical education semester 3 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal B Main Phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

• The 8 modules Analysis, the first of which starts in the first semester of the propaedeutic phase, are intended to teach students basic analytical skills and give them inside into music processes in relation to various style periods. This series of modules also promote insight into music processes in general. The analysis modules are a preparation for the lecture-recital in the fourth year and also support the performance practice.

• The 4 modules Harmony, the first of which starts in the first semester of the propaedeutic phase, are intended to teach students basic knowledge about diatonic and enhance their insight into harmonic processes. At the same time, these modules support the analysis modules.

Reference competencies • 11, 19, 20 Learning outcomes • After having successfully completed the module Analysis 3, students are able

to analyse more thoroughly a homophonic work from the Classical and/or Romantic period.

• After having successfully completed the module Harmony 3, students are able to elaborate given four-voice basses and sopranos in which chromaticism and modulation play a prominent part. Also, students are able to harmonically analyse a work from the Baroque and Romantic period and produce a harmonic reduction of the analysed work.

Coordinating department KM Contact person Rijnhard Bokelmann Language Bilingual (Dutch/English) Work forms • Formal lecture

• Group-practical class • Study group

Teacher(s) Rijnhard Bokelmann, , Jan Jongbloed, Willem Tanke, Gustavo Trujillo Entrance requirements All modules MTV year 1 must have been concluded successfully. Material/literature • Leon Stein: Structure & Style

• Leon Stein: Anthology of Musical Forms • Charles Rosen: Sonata Forms • Robert Gauldin: Harmonic Practice in Tonal Music • Bernard Nelleke: Algemene Muziekleer (General Music Theory) • Ulrich Michels: Sesam Atlas van de Muziek • Readers and practice material provided by the conservatory

Exam Exam 2 Exam description Analysis 3 Semester 1 Exam form Theory – written exam Content of the exam • One week before the exam, students are presented with two polyphonic works

from the late-Classical and/or Baroque period, in preparation for the exam. Students are asked open questions about these works during the oral exam.

Exam criteria • The The answers given in the exam will be scored by using a standards and answer sheet that also lists the distribution of points over the questions.

Exam duration 2 hours Weight 50% Study credits 1.5 Number of attempts 2 Result scale 20 points, 0.5 – 10, in halves

Generic module title General Theory subjects year 2 Specific module title KM Music-theoretical education semester 4 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal B Main Phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

• The 8 modules Analysis, the first of which starts in the first semester of the propaedeutic phase, are intended to teach students basic analytical skills and give them inside into music processes in relation to various style periods. This series of modules also promote insight into music processes in general. The analysis modules are a preparation for the lecture-recital in the fourth year and also support the performance practice.

• The 4 modules Harmony, the first of which starts in the first semester of the propaedeutic phase, are intended to teach students basic knowledge about diatonic and enhance their insight into harmonic processes. At the same time, these modules support the analysis modules.

Reference competencies • 11, 19, 20 Learning outcomes • After having successfully completed the module Analysis 4, students are able

to analyse a symphonic work and/or a chamber music piece from the late-Classical and/or Romantic period.

• After having successfully completed the module Harmony 4, students are able to elaborate given four-voice basses and sopranos in which chromaticism, modulation and embellishing notes play a prominent part. Also, students must be able to harmonically analyse a work from the late 19th century and produce a harmonic reduction of the analysed work.

Coordinating department KM Contact person Rijnhard Bokelmann Language Bilingual (Dutch/English) Work forms • Formal lecture

• Group-practical class • Study group

Teacher(s) Rijnhard Bokelmann, Jan Jongbloed, Willem Tanke, Gustavo Trujillo Entrance requirements • For Analysis 4: Analysis 3

• For Harmony 4: Harmony 3 Material/literature • Leon Stein: Structure & Style

• Leon Stein: Anthology of Musical Forms • Charles Rosen: Sonata Forms • Robert Gauldin: Harmonic Practice in Tonal Music • Ulrich Michels: Sesam Atlas van de Muziek • Readers and practice material provided by the conservatory

Exam Exam 1 Exam description Harmony 4 Semester 2 Exam form Theory – assignment Content of the exam One week before the oral exam, students are giving a written Harmony assignment

about the material of the second semester of the first year. This assignment must be handed in during the oral exam. Also, the homework assignments of the second semester must be handed in during the exam. The assignments are discussed through oral questions.

Exam criteria In the exam, students must demonstrate sufficient skills, knowledge and insight with regard to the study material. The elaborations of the harmony exam are judged against a model elaboration. The assessment criterion is that the voicing or part writing must be correctly applied in the elaborations. A minimum of roughly 70% of the elaborations must be faultless.

Exam duration 10 minutes Weight 50% Study credits 1,5 Number of attempts 2

Opmerking [LR1]: Moet hier niet ook ‘oral exam’ bij staan, gezien de tekst onder ‘content’?

Result scale 20 points, 0.5 – 10, in halves Exam Exam 2 Exam description Analysis 4 Semester 2 Exam form • Theory – written exam

• Theory – discussion Content of the exam • One week before the exam, students are presented with a large work from the

Romantic period and one piece that they play themselves, in preparation for the exam. Students are asked open questions about these works during the oral exam.

• Also, students take an oral exam about the works discussed in classes. Exam criteria • In the exam, students must demonstrate sufficient knowledge and skills with

regard to the study material. • In the exam, students must demonstrate insight into the overall structure,

phrasing, harmonic development and the melodic and rhythmic development of the works they studied in preparation.

Exam duration 20 minutes Weight 50% Study credits 1.5 Number of attempts 2 Result scale 20 points, 0.5 – 10, in halves

Generic module title General Theory subjects year 2 Specific module title KM Solfège year 2 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal B Main Phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

The subject Solfège consists of two modules that can be taken during the first two years of the study programme. Their goal is to develop the student’s imaginative powers in the area are of melody, rhythm, meter and harmony as well as the relationship between these components. This leads to an awareness of music processes which supports the main subject study. Enhancing the student’s auditive understanding also benefits the study of the other music-theoretical subjects.

Reference competencies 6, 11 Learning outcomes • sight-singing (solfège)

• executing rhythms • insight into the relationship between parts and the whole • developing a methodical approach

Coordinating department KM Contact person Rijnhard Bokelmann Language Dutch or English Work forms Group-practical classes Teacher(s) Frans de Berg Entrance requirements Having passed the entrance exam Material/literature • Pozzoli III-IV, solfège exercises until last ones

• Van der Horst, Time and rhythm part II Exam Exam Exam description Solfège year 2 Semester 2 Exam form Theory – practical theory Content of the exam The student must be able to:

• correctly execute rhythms with changes of meter • recognise harmonic changes • sing from sight • correct any mistakes

Exam criteria • are the meter changes correctly executed? • are the harmonic changes correctly identified? • are any mistakes corrected within the timeframe of the exam?

Exam duration 20 minutes Weight 1 Study credits 4 Number of attempts 2 Result scale 20 points, 0.5 – 10, in halves

Generic module title Practical Harmony year 2 Specific module title Minor Subject Piano with Main Subject Orchestral Instruments year 2 Code Osiris Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal D Propaedeutic Phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

While reading scores and playing the piano, students develop harmonic, analytical and interpretive thinking, which makes this subject an essential supporting element to the main subject. The modules help students to gain insight into complex music scores and make the content of the theoretical subjects more specific. Students learn to accompany others and how to reduce accompaniment parts. The repertoire is adjusted as closely as possible to the individual student’s level of development and his/her personal interests. The module consists of 32 classes of 20 minutes each and require 3 hours of self-study per week. In order to acquire adequate development, suppleness and skills, at least 12 solo and/or accompaniment pieces must be studied.

Reference competencies The minor supports competencies 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 21 Learning outcomes • Playing the piano with correct posture, solid technique and artistic expression.

• Being able to independently harmonise melodies and study accompaniments from the main subjects repertoire and play them in a technically appropriate manner.

• Becoming a helpful accompanist. Coordinating department Classical Music Contact person Martin Lekkerkerk Language Dutch; English (for non-Dutch speakers and during group activities) Work forms Individual practical lesson Teacher(s) Eli 't Hart, Martin Lekkerkerk, Irja Zeper, Annette Rogers Entrance requirements Successful passing of the module of semester 1 Material/literature Examples of solo repertoire (see also the description of the exam below):

Repertoire at a fitting and challenging level: at least step II. For instance: Kabalevski, D.: Jugendalbum; Mozart, W.A.: eenvoudige (kinder)stukken; Bach, J.S.: Notenbuchlein fur Anna Magdalena; Ibert, J.: Petite Suite en 15 images; Schumann, R.: Jugendalbum op. 68; Tsjaikovski, P.I.: Jugendalbum op. 39; Andriessen, J: Drie Dansen; binders at a basic level. Examples of harmony assignments: Assignments and/or handouts given by theory and piano teacher. Simpson: Keyboard Harmony and Improvisation Examples of accompaniment repertoire Binders such as 'My first concert' (flute, hoboe, etc.); (Pedagogical) repertoire, also arrangements, for the main subject, in consultation with the teacher; Jazz standards with chord symbols Examples of four-handed repertoire Weiner, L.: 3 kleine vierhändige Klavierstücke André, J.A..: six sonatinas op. 45 Haydn, J.: Deutsche Tänze Gurlitt, C. Der Anfänger op. 211 Schönmehl, M.: Jazz for two Part 1 Hellbach, D.: Piano for Two vol. 1

Exam Exam Exam description • a solo piece of at least 32 bars,

• a harmonisation created by the student, • one accompaniment of the main subject and • either a second solo or accompaniment, or a four-handed piece, from a light genre if

desired. Semester 2 Exam form Practical exam: performing rehearsed repertoire Content of the exam • feedback from the teacher

• group session with feedback from fellow students and a teacher (late-November, mid-February and late-May)

• reflection and self-reflection of video recordings of the student’s play • student concert (in June)

Exam criteria • technical level • control and finishing • expressive presentation • skills in playing together

Exam duration 15 minutes Weight 1 Study credits 2 Number of attempts 4 Result scale 20 points, 0.5 – 10, in halves

Generic module title Playing Together year 2 Specific module title Playing Together Orchestral Instruments and Harp year 2 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal D Main Phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

The module Playing Together Orchestral Instruments and Harp focuses mainly on the competencies ‘collaborative skills’ and ‘communication’ in a musical context. The subject Chamber Music is directly linked to the professional practice of students of orchestral instruments and harp. Besides the already mentioned social competencies, artistic competencies most definitely are addressed here too. The subject Orchestra Projects is specifically aimed at gaining experience in the practice of orchestra culture and concert stages.

Reference competencies 3-10 Learning outcomes Chamber Music:

• you demonstrate good skills in playing together (such as balance and musical communication)

• you demonstrate good tone quality • you demonstrate good intonation • you demonstrate good social communication (such as stage skills) Orchestra Projects: these modules are taken in all study years to gain experience in the practice of orchestra culture and concert stages, so that you know the general rules that orchestra musicians must follow. You will play in the projects that are part of your study schedule, usually four each year.

Coordinating department KM Contact person Erik Zwiep Language Dutch or English Work forms • Group practical lesson

• individual practical lesson Teacher(s) Chamber Music: Nancy Braithwaite, Sander Sittig, Henk Guittart, Jeroen den Herder,

Bart van de Roer, Bram van Sambeek, Tomi Shimon Orchestra Projects: depending on the project

Entrance requirements None Material/literature Depending on project Exam Exam 1 Exam description Orchestra Projects Semester 2 Exam form Attendance Content of the exam Throughout the year, the orchestra inspection checks the attendance records of all

students. Exam criteria • Attendance

• Discipline To be judged by the orchestra inspection.

Exam duration none Weight 1 Study credits 6 Number of attempts 2 Result scale Fail/Pass Exam Exam 2 Exam description Chamber Music Semester 2 Exam form Practical exam Content of the exam Performing the prepared composition Exam criteria • Functioning of the group throughout the year

• Technique, ensemble play, rhythm, intonation, tone production, balance and

knowledge of styles • Charisma • Attendance (100% mandatory) • Communicative skills • Professional attitude, musicality, artistry

Exam duration 30 minutes Weight 1 Study credits 3 Number of attempts 2 Result scale 20-points scale, in halves

Generic module title Genre- specific Subjects year 2 Specific module title Orchestral Play year 2 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal B Main Phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

The modules Orchestral Play are mandatory for students of the main subjects Orchestral Instruments or Harp. These modules are taken in the study years 1, 2 and 3, in order to gain experience in the practice of playing together within the group to which you belong. We distinguish between the following groups: low strings, high strings, woodwinds, brasses, harp and percussion.

Reference competencies 4-6, 8-10, 12 Learning outcomes • You know what general rules and musician in an orchestra should follow.

• You have gained experience in playing together within a group Coordinating department KM Contact person Erik Zwiep Language Dutch or English Work forms Group practical lesson Teacher(s) Same as the subject teacher(s) Entrance requirements Material/literature Orchestral repertoire as chosen by the main subject teachers Exam Exam Exam description Orchestral Play year 2 Semester 2 Exam form Practical exam Content of the exam • Part of the solo concert with piano accompaniment

• Two mandatory orchestra excerpts • One orchestra excerpts prima vista

Exam criteria The committee, consisting of two teachers, judges whether the exam was passed with sufficient results. This must be evident from having mastered parts of the orchestral repertoire.

Exam duration 15 minutes Weight 1 Study credits 3 Number of attempts 2 Result scale Pass/Fail

Generic module title Portfolio year 2 Specific module title Portfolio year 2 Code Osiris Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal B Main phase Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

General: The portfolio is a module that contains several activities. Some activities are organized by Codarts (such as the project weeks), other activities are designed by the student (individual study activities) Both types of activities have an common that they are focused on orientation on making informed choices in study and professional practice. They confront the student with different aspects of the art profession, both with regards to the different professional roles and other art disciplines. This broad orientation on the art profession stimulates the student to reflect on his own ambitions and profile and to translate this into concrete choices during and after study. The Portfolio year 2 consists of four elements:

• Individual study activities, (56 hours, or 2 ec) • Project week 1 • Project week 2 • Introduction to edcuation

Individual study activities (ISA’s) Isa’s are activities designed and performed by the student, such as participation in extra ensembles, own ensembles outside of Codarts, workshops, courses, etc. The ISA’s stimulate the self-directed or authentic learning. The ISA must answer to a fixed set of criteria. The ISA

• Is executed on initiative of the student • Is supported by a learning question • Is aimed at a desired result • Gives a broader perspective or a deepened understanding • Has a relation to the broader context of the art profession

At the start of the study year the student discusses his ISA plans with his study coach and writes his account of the executed activities in an ISA report at the of the year. (see below under Exam 1.) Deadline for handing in the report is 15 June. Deadline for the retry is 25 August. Project weeks Every year two project weeks are organized. At least one of these weeks has a department transcending character in the sense that students of different departments and disciplines participate in joined projects. Form and theme vary per project week. During the project week the student is given the opportunity to get acquainted with disciplines/ genres/ aspects of the professional practice that were still unknown to him. When a student has attended the project(s) to which he was assigned, he obtains a positive result. Students that have not sufficiently attended the project(s) will have to do an substituting assignment (see below under Exam 2) Introduction to education In this course students are introduced to the (new) aspects of the teaching profession in the modern day music practice. Students will take part in the practical Edu day and will follow the course Introduction to methodology. During the Edu day the students will take part in several workshops that are related to the current music education practice. The student will get acquainted with aspects and possibilities of the teaching practice that he has not heard of before. The course focuses on themes that are geared to the students’ perception of the music practice. We will talk about own (first) learning experiences and inspiring examples, study techniques and didactical aspects. Student will prepare a lesson for a fellow student, be taught by a fellow student and observe teaching situations. The number of lessons, the form and the themes

that are covered, differs per department. Reference competencies ISA’s: 20, 21

Project weeks: 3, 5, 13, 15, 19 Introduction to education: 5, 19, 22, 23

Learning outcomes ISA’s: Learning outcome is presented by the student Projectweeks/Health & Performance day: the project weeks serve as an orientation on several aspects of the art profession. Broadening of perspective and gain new experiences are the main goal. There are no pre-set learning goals that are tested at the end of the module. Introduction to education: The education day serves as orientation on the possibilities of the teaching profession. Gaining new ideas and experiences are the main goal. No learning goals will be tested at the end of the day. The introduction to methodology gives an introduction to the different approaches in methodology and didactics of instrumental lessons. The student has taken note of this.

Coördinating department Muziek (JPW+KM) Contact person Renske Wassink Language Dutch/ English Work forms ISA’s: individual coaching by study coach

Projectweken: differs per project Introducation on education: lecture/ seminar

Teacher(s) ISA’s: n.a. Projectweken: differs per project week Introductie op educatie: differs per section

Entrance requirements None Material/literature N.a. Exam Exam 1 Exam description ISA’s Semester 2 Exam form ISA Content of the exam Isa evaluation report in the standards ISA format. If applicable, add programme booklet/

flyer/ audiovisual material. The report covers the following aspects: motivation, description of the activity, learning outcome, evaluation of the activity, time investment.

Exam criteria • Validity: relevance for music studies • Size of the evaluation report: 1 to 2 pages A4 (Calibri 11) • Sufficient explanation of motivation • Detailed and clear description of the activity • Is the desired learning outcome achieved? • Sufficient reflection on the activity • Sufficient time investment (28 hours per ec)

Exam duration N.a. Weight 40%

Study credits 2

Number of attempts 2

Result scale Pass/ Not sufficient

Exam Exam 2 Exam description Project week 1 Semester 1 Exam form Attendance (with the use of attendance list) Content of the exam The result (pass/not sufficient) is based on attendance. Students that have not sufficiently

attended the project(s) will have to do an substituting assignment (see below under Exam 2). Substituting assignment:

• The substituting assignment for the project week has the form of extra Individual Study Activities. The writes an account of these activities in a

report, according to the standard Isa procedure (same format, deadline, handing in at study coach)

• The substituting activities should cover at least 28 hours. • Every project week has a theme. The extra ISA’s will have to take this theme

into account. The manager of the department sees to it that with the design of the project week the theme is translated to a clear framework for the substituting assignment. When the different departments/ programmes have different themes, this will be translated into the substituting assignment.

• The theme for the substitution for the second (inter-departmental) project week will be equal for all departments.

• The theme for the substituting assignment will be communicated within two weeks after the project week or as soon it is known which students did not attend.

• When a students has only followed parts of the project week, these hours may be included in the report of the substituting assignment.

Exam criteria Attendance of minimum 75%.

This means that of a project of 8 daily periods, you may miss 2 periods. Of a project of 4 daily periods, you may miss 1.

Exam duration N.a. Weight 20% Study credits 1 Number of attempts 2 Result scale Pass/ Not sufficient

Exam Exam 3 Exam description Project week 2 Semester 2 Exam form Attendance (with the use of attendance list) Content of the exam See Project week 1 Exam criteria Attendance of minimum 75%.

This means that of a project of 8 daily periods, you may miss 2 periods. Of a project of 4 daily periods, you may miss 1.

Exam duration N.a. Weight 20% Study credits 1 Number of attempts 2 Result scale Pass/ Not sufficient

Exam Exam 4 Exam description Introduction to education Semester 2 Exam form Edu day: deelname Attendance (with the use of attendance list)

Course Introduction to methodology : Theory – assignment (report) Content of the exam Edu day: the result (pass/not sufficient) is based on attendance. Students that have not

attended the Edu day will have to do an substituting assignment. The course Introduction to methodology will be concluded by handing in a number of assignments (form and theme differ per department) and a written report about the covered topics.

Exam criteria - The assignments are executed according to the instructions - The report contains reflection on the lessons that were given, received and observed.

Exam duration n.a. Weight 20% Study credits 1 Number of attempts 2 Result scale Pass/ Not sufficient

Generic module title Music World Wide Specific module title Music World Wide Code Osiris Course type Cursus Year Jaar 1 (DM), Jaar 2 (JPW/KM) Exam goal D Propedeuse Bachelor (DM), B Hoofdfase Bachelor (JPW/KM) Content/relation to professional practice

The Music World Wide module consists of weekly lectures on different music cultures from all over the world, given by experts – musicians and musicologists and aims to convey an initial understanding of the music culture; Some of the teachers work in the different Codarts music departments, and others are guest teachers from outside. Semester 1 concentrates on ‘Inventions’ – musical themes such as modality/tonality, harmony and rhythm, and Semester 2 focuses on music genres worldwide. Music cultures which use a modal system such as the raga of Indian classical music and the makam of Turkish music are introduced, and the development of harmony in Western music is also examined. Different rhythmic concepts and systems are explained, such as polyrhythm, tala (Indian music), and the rhythms of Turkish and Arabic music. Flamenco and Argentinian tango are also outlined. Various musics such as Indonesian/Balinese gamelan, mbira music fom Zimbabwe, Brazilian vocal and Klezmer are presented, and the history of jazz is discussed. The lectures are interactive with video and audio excerpts, live music demonstrations, question and answer, learning a short piece from the music, depending on the different teachers and their methods. Reader handouts are provided on paper and/or digitally; these as well as music excerpts are available for consultation on the student website N@tschool. As part of this module two coaching sessions will take place, to help the student prepare for the final assignment, consisting of a Media Review. During these coaching sessions students will be taught the basic principles of source research.

Reference competencies 13, 15, 17 Learning outcomes • “Intermusical competency”, the ability to recognise and describe different music

cultures on the basis of the parameters presented (rhythm, harmony, modality/tonality),

• The student chooses a topic from the Music world wide lectures and is able to find relevant sources on this topic,

• The student is able to independently investigate different sources and write a media review about three sources,

Coördinating department DM Contact person Jane Harvey Language Dutch/ English (2 seperate groups) Work forms Lecture Teacher(s) Guest teachers, different per topic Entrance requirements Entrance audition passed Material/literature • Digital reader handouts and audio extracts on the N@tschool website

• Codarts Library Exam Exam Exam description Music world wide Semester 2 Exam form Theorie - in te leveren opdracht Content of the exam Written Assignment to be handed in. Exam criteria • Attendance: minimum 70% of the lessons. Under this percentage, assignment cannot

be submitted. If under 50%, the course has to be followed again. If attendance is 50-70%, 10 extra lessons need to be followed. The assignment may be handed in when all extra lessons are completed (the next year).

• Understanding of chosen topic demonstrated in media review on 3 sources: - The selection should be coherent and relevant for the topic - The students’ text should be original - Discussion of the information should be relevant for the question presented in

the introductory paragraph

- The layout, format and references should follow the rules and APA style guide - Texts should be written in English or Dutch

Exam duration n.a. Weight 1 Study credits 3 Number of attempts 2 Result scale 20 point, 0,5 – 10, rounded off in halves

Generic module title General Theory Classes Year 2 Specific module title KM Music History 3 Code Osiris Code (16) Course type Course Year Year 2 Exam goal Bachelor Content/relation to professional practice

Music History 3 discusses the music and cultural history of Romanticism and late-Romanticism (1810-1910). The module presents a historical overview of the music of this period against the background of its cultural context, using audio fragments, scores and visualisations.

Reference competencies 2,5,7,12,15, 21 Learning outcomes After having successfully completed this module, students will have a historic insight into

the music of Romanticism and late-Romanticism and will have mastered the conceptual framework relevant to this period. They are able to name and distinguish between the various types and styles of music of those times, both by ear and by reading scores.

Coordinating department KM Contact person Marcel Zijlstra Language Bilingual (Dutch/English) Work forms • Lectures

• Workgroup • Presentations

Teacher(s) Marcel Zijlstra Entrance requirements KM Music History 1 and 2 Material/literature • Donald Grout, Claude Palisca: Een geschiedenis van de Westerse Muziek (NL)

• Donald Grout, Claude Palisca, A History of Western Music (8th ed.) (EN) Exam Exam 1 Exam description Music History 3 Semester 1 Exam form • Presentation

• Written Exam Content of the exam In the presentation, students must demonstrate that they are able to handle the

concepts and notions of the period concerned and to explain these to others, on the basis of their own literature studies and general analysis of the music.

The ‘open book’ exam tests historical insight and understanding, as well as the ability to effectively apply the relevant conceptual framework.

Exam criteria In the exam, students must demonstrate to possess sufficient knowledge and skills in relation to the studied material.

Exam duration 75 minutes Weight 100% Study credits 3 Number of attempts 2 20 points, 0,5 – 10, in halves