clarke, r. j (2001) l951-03: 1 critical issues in information systems buss 951 seminar 3...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 1
Critical Issues in Information Systems
BUSS 951
Seminar 3Organisations
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 2
Agenda
Assignment 1ontology and epistemologyhypotheses and theoriesgeneral questions
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 4
Ontology & Epistemology
Epistemology: the theory of knowledge especially the critical study of its validity, methods and scope
Ontology: the set of entities presupposed by a theory
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 5
Hypotheses and Theories
Hypotheses are conjectures, speculations, or hunches, framed in such a way that it can tested
Result of a test often leads to a more refined hypotheses in a sense there is no formal difference between a
hypothesis and a theory theories are hypotheses that experiments have not yet
managed to refute and which seem to explain many facts about the world in one inclusive framework
theories like hypotheses are always provisional and the best ones can be surplanted eg. Newton’s theory of gravity contrasted with Einstein’s theory of relativity
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 7
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (1)
identifies two major perspectives in the social analysis of IS literature:systems rationalismsegmented institutionalism
tries to classify the “array of assumptions” informing the claims made about new computing technologies
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 8
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (2)
classification based on:recent empirical research of the use
and consequences of computing in organisations
classified according to conceptions of ‘social life’ in organisations
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 10
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (3)Systems Rationalism
emphasis on positive roles that computer based systems play in organisations (‘social life’)
examine new capabilities of computing technologies, or new areas of application
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 11
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (4)Systems Rationalism
assume: a consensus on major social goals relevant to computing use
develop synoptic accounts of social behaviour (brief summaries emphasising general points of agreement)
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 12
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (5)Systems Rationalism
efficiency foregrounded (economic or organisational)
computer use limited to individual computer users- individualism
What are the consequences of individualism?
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 13
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (6)Systems Rationalism
large variety of different types of ‘schools’:“the systems approach”managerial rationalismstructural analysis (within managerial rationalism)
What disciplines would ‘recognise’ or comply with a systems rationalist argument about technology?
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 14
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (7)Systems Rationalism
privaledge the interests of managers as more legitimate than subordinates
Managerial Rationalists try to ‘optimise’ organisations by using computing technology
What happens when organisations restructure?
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 15
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (8)Systems Rationalism
others (including IS developers) simply concentrate on what is done independent of the reasons for why it is done the way it is (apart from costs?)
Structural Analysts look at contextual reasons which might help select the right technology (slack resources, channels...)
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 16
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (9)Systems Rationalism
Human Relations analysts emphasise the role of technology in altering the quality of working life- assumes common goals exist
historically arose as a consequence of a reaction to Scientific Mgmt
but, HR still assumes you can get a best fit between technology & organisations-Liberal-Humanist Discourse
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 17
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (10)Systems Rationalism
Considerable differences between the schools in relation to agency
managerial rationalists assume conflicts can be solved by appeals to an administrative authority (managerial)
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 18
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (11)Systems Rationalism
Considerable differences between the schools in relation to goals
some assume common consensus understood equally by all (others don’t)
<Remember that goals are central to the application of systems thinking to organisations>
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 19
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (12)Systems Rationalism
Considerable differences between the schools in relation to decisions and by implications problems
some view decisions from a single rationality
others view managers (Simon) as having only a partial understanding at any point in time
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 21
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (13) Segmented Institutionalists
assume: broad scope for the use of computers
includes as many different members of organisations as possible (including clients, suppliers etc.)
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 22
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (14)Segmented Institutionalists
examine the consequences of computerized technology
don’t assume a consensus on goals and values in an organisation (intergroup conflict is just as likely as consensus)
privilege individual and group control over efficiency
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 23
Klings (1980) Taxonomy (15)Segmented Institutionalists
most reject ideas of ‘optimums’ or ‘equilibria’ applying to organisations at all
segmented institutionalists differ about how to understand ‘social life’ and the role of computing in organisations