city council december 20, 2011 planning

54
City Council December 20, 2011

Upload: city-of-san-angelo-texas

Post on 14-Dec-2014

176 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

City CouncilDecember 20, 2011

Page 2: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Zone Change

Z 11-19: Maranatha Church

• Z 11-19, a request for approval of a zone change from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District to Low Rise Multi-family Residential (RM-1) District on the following property:

• 80 East 18th Street, on the northwest corner of East 18th Street and Henderson Street, specifically the Lasker Addition, Block 29, Lot 9, in north central San Angelo.

11 notifications were sent, 6 received in opposition

Page 3: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Zoning Map

Page 4: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Aerial Map

Page 5: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 6: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if any

Page 7: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

LOOKING NORTH AT SUBJECT PROPERTY

Page 8: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

LOOKING NORTHEAST ACROSS HENDERSON – COMMERCIAL ZONING

Page 9: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

LOOKING EAST ACROSS HENDERSON AT NEARBY CHURCH (NOT PROPONENT)

Page 10: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

LOOKING SOUTH AT ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD FROM 18TH/HENDERSON

Page 11: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 12: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

History & Background• Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District;

• Small vacant apartment buildings (2);

• Legal nonconformity has expired;

• North: RS-2 & CGWest: RS-2South: RS-2East: RS-2 & CG/CH

Page 13: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

History & Background• E 18th & Henderson Streets are “local”;

• “Group living” not allowed in current zoning;

• Includes dormitories, boarding houses, assisted living facilities, group homes for disabled;

• Proposed zoning differences – increased FAR and minimum lot size – current structures meet both;

Page 14: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for Recommendation• Fits with Vision Plan Map – “neighborhood”;

• Fits with Comp Plan principles:• “Neighborhoods, in order to be sustainable, should

have a diversity of residential products & affordability levels.”

• “Neighborhood connectivity” – proximity to major collector;

• “Promote better transition between commercial & residential”;

Page 15: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for RecommendationIn conforming to the Comprehensive Plan, this request meets the following criteria as outlined in ordinance:

• Reflects Development Patterns;• Meets Community Need;• Compatible with Plans & Policies;• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance;• Compatible with Surrounding Area.

Page 16: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Staff Recommendation• City staff recommends approving the zone change as

presented;

• Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 1;

Page 17: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Zone Change

Z 11-20 Norman Dierschke

• Subject: a request for approval of a Zone Change from Single Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN).

• Property: 3902 Coliseum Drive, specifically occupying Mather Addition No. 2, S 50’ of W. 139.4’ of Block 1, in northern San Angelo.

15 notifications were sent out, 0 received in favor or opposition

Page 18: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 19: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Zoning Map

Page 20: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Aerial Map

Page 21: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 22: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING AT SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM COLIESUM DRIVE

Page 23: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING NORTH DOWN COLISEUM DRIVE TOWARDS COLISEUM FACILITIES

Page 24: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING EAST DOWN 39TH STREET AT ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD

Page 25: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING SOUTH FROM INTERSECTION OF COLISEUM & NORTH CHADBOURNE

Page 26: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING WEST ACROSS COLISEUM AT NEARBY COMMERCIAL USES

Page 27: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

History & Background• Single-Family Residential (RS-1);

• Vacant laundromat facility;

• Key intersection at southwest corner of one of three largest residential areas of the city;

• CN zoning intended to serve a larger neighborhood & provide a transition into such a neighborhood;

Page 28: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for Recommendation• Fits with Vision Plan - “neighborhood”;

• Lot located at a strategic entry point;

• Located at a major intersection (Coliseum – collector, N Chadbourne – arterial);

Page 29: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for Recommendation• Fits with Comp Plan principles:

• “Promote better transition between nearby commercial & residential use”;

• Require an intermediate buffer separating commercial land from neighborhoods;

• “Promote a mix of various uses at key intersections to encourage necessary infill”;

Page 30: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Staff Recommendation• City staff recommends approving this zone change;

• Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval;

Page 31: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for RecommendationIn conforming to the Comprehensive Plan, this request meets the following criteria as outlined in ordinance:

• Reflects Development Patterns;• Meets Community Need;• Compatible with Plans & Policies;• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance;• Compatible with Surrounding Area.

Page 32: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Zone Change

Z 11-22 SAISD

• Request for a zone change from Single Family Residential (RS-1) to High Rise Multi-Family Residence (RM-2)

• 323 Penrose Street on the southwest corner of Penrose Street

and Fort McKavett Road, specifically occupying 3 Acres from the G. Blum Survey A-0059 S-0166, in eastern San Angelo

40 notifications were sent, 5 received in favor, 0 in opposition.

Page 33: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Proponents map

Page 34: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 35: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Zoning Map

Page 36: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Aerial Map

Page 37: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 38: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING NORTH FROM INTERSECTION OF FT MCKAVETT ROAD & PENROSE

Page 39: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING WEST DOWN PENROSE AT NEIGHBORHOOD

Page 40: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING WEST AT SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM FT MCKAVETT

Page 41: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING SOUTH DOWN FT MCKAVETT ROAD AT NEIGHBORHOOD

Page 42: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING WEST AT NEARBY NEIGHBORHOOD & GREER ST

Page 43: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Map of notifications received if anyLOOKING WEST AT SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM MARGIE ST

Page 44: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

History & Background• Elementary School;

• School use allowed by CU 11-17, which allows for a school at this location;

• However, zone change will create a more appropriate designation that will allow substantial lot coverage;

• With proposed construction, this facility will exceed the allowed lot coverage in RS-1;

Page 45: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

History & Background• RM-2 districts allow up to 100% lot coverage, whereas

RS-1 only allows 40%;

• Staff is proactively working with SAISD to assess zoning of all school properties;

• This change will ensure a great deal of room to continue growing in the future without issue;

Page 46: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for Recommendation• Fits with Vision Plan - “neighborhood”;

• Lot located at a strategic entry point;

• Compatible with existing uses and area – schools are essential parts of a neighborhood;

• Buffer between Air Force Base and RS-1 zoning;

• Consistent with development patterns.

Page 47: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Analysis – Basis for RecommendationIn conforming to the Comprehensive Plan, this request meets the following criteria as outlined in ordinance:

• Reflects Development Patterns;• Meets Community Need;• Compatible with Plans & Policies;• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance;• Compatible with Surrounding Area.

Page 48: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Staff Recommendation• City staff recommends approval;

• Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval;

Page 49: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Downtown Development District• After examining a number of downtown-related

districts, the DDC recommends that the boundaries for the DDD be amended;

• July 26th – Commission asked for information about other districts in the downtown area;

Page 50: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Downtown Development District• August 22nd - consensus that the current boundaries of

the DDD should be expanded to include all property within each of the already-established districts;

• Suggested that boundaries be expanded to include some areas east of Main Street, south of Washington, and north of Houston Harte;

Page 51: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Downtown Development District• Oct 6th - Commission directed staff to prepare a new

and improved boundary;• Areas that were presented as part of other districts

should be included;• Two areas in Main Street District but not currently

included in the Downtown Development District: to the southwest of downtown and to the southeast.

• Include corridors of N Bryant, N Chadbourne, and N Main to West 14th Street; these act as “gateways” and bring traffic downtown.

Page 52: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

Downtown Development District• Nov 30th - staff presented a final map incorporating all

the suggestions from the previous discussions;

• At this time, the DDC unanimously approved the changes.

Page 53: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning
Page 54: City Council December 20, 2011 Planning

City CouncilDecember 20, 2011