city council committee meetings (1/27/2015)

8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)

1/23

LttQ /,

Q'f\\0 City of Troy

u ~

REVISED

NOTICE 1-23-20

15 TO

DD

COMMITTEE

TROY

CITY COUNCIL

COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE

COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY

HALL

100 S. MARKET STREET, TROY, OHIO

Tuesday, January 27, 2015, 5:00 P

Recreation Parks CommiHee

(Heath [Chm.],

Oda

Tremblay)

1 Provide a

recommendation to

Council

regarding

authorizing the Recreation Board

to enter

into

an

agreement with Crossroads Consulting Services

to

perform the feasibility study for a second

sheet

of

ice at Hobart Arena at a cost not

to

exceed 50,000.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015, 6:00

P

Community Economic Development CommiHee

Twiss

[Chm.], Kendall, Schweser)

1. Provide a

recommendation

to Council regarding

Ordinance

No. 0-1-2015, the rezoning of 40

parcels (former Hobart

Bros./ITW

factory site and parking lots) from M-2, Light Industrial District, to

OC- 1, Office Commercial District.

Other Committees/items may

be added.

1-21-2015

Rev. 1-23-2015

cc:

Council

Mayor

Mr. Titterington

Mr. Livingston

Mr. Stickel

Department

Heads

Chamber of

Commerce

Bd of

Education

media


2/23

RECRE TION

P RKS

COMMITTEE


3/23

~ t Q / ,

Qb\

City

of Troy

u ~

TO:

Mrs. Baker, President of Council

MEMORANDUM

Patrick E. J Titterington

-

...

100 S. Market Street

P. 0 Box 3003

Troy

, Ohio 45373

www

.

troyohio gov

phone:

937)

335-1725

fax:

937)

339-8601

patri ck. i ttering on @troyohio.

gov

FROM: Patrick E.

J.

Titterington, Director of Public Service and Safety

DATE: January

23,

2015

SUBJECT:

UTHORIZING GREEMENT WITH CROSSRO DS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR

FE SIBILITY STUDY FOR SECOND SHEET OF I E FOR HOB RT REN

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Recreation Board

be

authorized to enter into a professional services agreement with Crossroads

Consulting Services of Tampa, Florida to perform a Feasibility Study related to a second sheet of ice at the Hobart

Arena at a cost not to exceed $50,000.

BACKGROUND:

The July 28, 2014, report of the Committee of the Whole regarding the Riverfront Development Project, included

the recommendation of:

While not a matter of legislation, based on the interest in the stand-alone second sheet of ice option,

several members of Council asked that the 2015 budget include funds related to a feasibility study and a

study of the economic impact such a facility could bring to the Troy community, as well as exploring funding

partnerships.

$50,000 was included

in

the 2015 Hobart Arena Budget for that feasibility study. The Recreation Director has

recommended that the firm of Crossroads Consulting Services of Tampa, Florida be authorized to perform the

feasibility study. This

is

the firm that Council authorized to perform the Hobart Arena Study at the end of 2013 and,

as a part of the study, already has some information relating to a second sheet of ice. At the January 21 meeting of

the Recreation Board, the Board supported the recommendation of the Recreation Director and approved a motion

that the Recreation Board recommends that Troy City Council authorize the Board to enter into a professional

services agreement with Crossroads Consulting Services to perform a feasibility study related to a second sheet of

ice at a cost not to exceed $50,000. The scope of services will include a market demand analysis, profile an

inventory of ice rinks

in

the region, survey user groups and develop

an

estimate of usage, assess operating

impact, develop a financial pro forma and cost benefit analysis, and develop a conceptual design and cost analysis.

The feasibility study does not provide a final design or cost estimates based

on

that design. The estimated time

frame to perform the feasibility study

is

about four months.

REQUESTED ACTION:

It would be appreciated if you would assign to a Committee of Council considering legislation authorizing the

Recreation Board to enter into an agreement with Crossroads Consulting Services to perform the feasibility study

for a second sheet of ice at Hobart Arena at a cost not to exceed $50,000.

Cc: Mayor Beamish

K.

Siler

Recreation Board


4/23

COMMUNITY

E ONOMI

DEVELOPMENT

OMMITTEE


5/23

1st rd

CITY

OF

TROY, OHIO

ORDINANCE No _=

--=--1-=20.:..::: 15

- ===O=R=DI=N=A=NCE

CHANGING THE ZONING OF FORTY (40)

I

PARCELS

IN

THE CITY OF TROY, OHIO FROM M-2,

COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

I

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO OC-1, OFFICE-

I

WHEREAS, a request for zoning change was presented to the Planning

Commission

of

the City

of

Troy, Ohio, to rezone forty (40) parcels in the City

of

Troy,

abutting

N.

Elm Street, W. Water Street, W. Main Street, and

N.

Adams Street at the

site

of

the former Hobart Brothers factory and parking lots, and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City

of

Troy, Ohio, has reviewed

the plan and recommended approval, and

WHEREAS, at least thirty days notice of the public hearing

of

said change has

been provided in a newspaper

of

general circulation,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council

of

the City

of

Troy,

Oh

io

as follows:

SECTION 1: That the zoning be changed from M-2. Light Industrial District to

OC-

1

Office Commercial District, for the forty (40) parcels

of

real estate abutting

N.

Elm

Street,

W.

Water Street, W. Main Street, and

N.

Adams Street at the site

of

the former

Hobart Brothers factory and parking lots as shown on the Exhibit A attached hereto.

SECTION II: That this Ordinance shall be effective at the earliest date allowed by

law:

Adopted:.

_________

President

of

Council

Approved:_________

At test :

Clerk

of

Council

Mayor

j

i

i

---

---- --

-

-.

---

____/


6/23


7/23

.

. .

t Q / ,

Qt\\ City of Troy

u ~

MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

Mrs. Baker, President, Troy City Council

Sue Knight, for the Troy Planning Commission

December 11, 2014

REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REZONING

APPLICATION-

600

WEST

MAIN

STREET (40 PARCELS TOTAL) FROM TO M-2 LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO OC-1, OFFICE

COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; THE AREA

PROPOSED

TO BE REZONED CONSISTS OF TEN

PARCELS

LOCATED ALONG NORTH ELM STREET (BETWEEN WASHINGTON STREET

AND WEST

WATER

STREET ,

FIVE

PARCELS

LOCATED ALONG

THE

INTERSECTION OF WEST WATER

STREET

AND

ADAMS

STREET,

AND 25 PARCELS THAT ENCOMPASS THE 600 WEST

MAIN

STREET LOCATION.

On December 10, 2014, the Troy Planning Commission considered the rezoning of 40 parcels that make up the

former ITW/Hobart Brothers site,

with

the general address of 600 West Main Street, from the zoning

of

M-2, Light

Industrial District, to the zoning

of

OC-1, Office-Commercial District. The owner of the property

is

the Hobart

Brothers Company; the City of Troy is the applicant.

Ten parcels are located along North Elm Street (between Washington Street and West Water Street), five parcels

are located along the intersection of West Water Street and Adams Street,

and 25

parcels encompass the 600

West Main Street location.

The Commission had received a report of City staff, which was reviewed as part

of the

meeting discussion. A

copy

of

the packet provided

to

the Commission is attached.

It was commented at the meeting that the City reached out to the property owner for a rezoning of the area that

will complement the commercial district and respect the nearby residential uses. Staff reviewed with the

Commission that the proposed OC-lOffice-Commercial District zoning will

fit

best into this mixed use area, as OC-

1 zoning is designed to accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses consisting of groupings of

professional type uses, and the district is designed and intended

to

act

as

a buffer and is intended

to be

mapped

along major thoroughfares as a transitional area between nonresidential and residential uses. The OC-1 zoning

does not permit residential development in this district; however, it does allow residential uses on the second

story or above. Further, the OC-1 district limits commercial uses that are envisioned

to

prevent disruption to the

surrounding existing residential neighborhoods and the

OC-1

zoning will protect the surrounding residences from

the more intensive uses that are currently allowed in the M-2 zoning district. The Comprehensive Plan s Future

Land Use (Figure 14-2) shows this area

as

it

currently is (industrial) and the surrounding land uses to remain the

same, as a mix

of

commercial, government, residential and recreational

uses.

Retaining the industrial zoning does

not fit well

with

the adjoining mix of uses. Staff advised the Commission

of

the staff opinion

that

adjoining

properties will benefit from the positive impact

of

the proposed

OC-1

zoning as

it

permits the greatest flexibility

to the reuse

of

the property while complementing the existing commercial uses and protecting the surrounding

residential zoning districts. The owner concurs with the rezoning

to

OC-1.


8/23

MEMO

PAGE TWO

The Planning Commission determined

not to

hold a public hearing on this rezoning application.

By

unanimous vote, the Troy Planning Commission recommends to Troy City Council

th t

the rezoning request

identified as 600 West Main Street (40 parcels total) from to M-2, Light-Industrial District,

to

OC-1 Office

Commercial District,

be

approved, based on the findings

of

staff that:

The proposed rezoning

is

consistent

with

the Zoning Code s intent

to

separate incompatible land

uses;

The proposed rezoning will C


9/23

TO: Troy Planning Commission

FROM:

Planning staff

.

DATE: Decem

.

ber 1 _.2014.

SUBJECT:

Rezoning: 600 West Main Street Surrounding Properties

OWNER: Hobart Brothers Company

APPLICANT: City

of

Troy

BACKGROUND

The City of Troy has applied, on behalf of Hobart Brothers Company, for Planning

Commission to consider the rezoning of 40 parcels from the M-2 Light-Industrial District

to the OC-1 Office-Commercial District. A list

of

the parcels, as well as, a map

highlighting the parcels of the proposed rezoning has been attached to this report.

The area

of

the rezoning is broken into 10 parcels located along North Elm Street

(between Washington Street and West Water Street), five parcels along the intersection

of West Water Street and Adams Street, and 25 parcels that encompass the 600 West

Main Street location.

The surrounding zoning districts include B-2 General Business District to the south, a

mixture of B-2 General Business District and R-7 Multi-Family to the east, R-6 Two

Family Residential to the west, and M-2 Light-Industrial to the north.

DISCUSSION

The razing of the old Hobart Brothers building has left an opportunity for redevelopment

in the heart of our community. This area was once dominated by industrial uses but has

since grown into a mixture of commercial and residential uses. The City has reached out

to the property owner for a rezoning of the area that will complement the commercial

district and respect the nearby residential uses. A rezoning from the M-2 Light-Industrial

district to the OC-1 Office-Commercial district will fit harmoniously into this mixed use

area.

The Zoning Code describes the OC-1 Office-Commercial district as designed to

accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses consisting of groupings

of

professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic and

similar uses. This district is designed and intended to act as a buffer and is intended

to

be mapped along major thoroughfares as a transitional area between nonresidential and

residential uses. The OC-1 district does not permit residential development in this

district; however, it does allow residential uses on the second story or above.

The OC-1 district limits commercial uses that are envisioned to prevent disruption to the

surrounding existing residential neighborhoods and the rezoning will protect the

surrounding residences from the more intensive uses that are currently allowed in

theM

2 zoning district. Attached to this report are the permitted uses

s

described by the OC-1

zoning district and the M-2 zoning district


10/23

The Comprehensive Plan s Future Land Use (Figure 14-2) shows this area as it currently

is (industrial) and the surrounding land uses to remain the same,

as a mix of commercial,

government, residential and recreational uses. The industrial use does not fit well with

the adjoining mix ofuses.

t

is staffs opinion that adjoining properties will benefit from the positive impact of the

proposed rezoning. The proposed OC 1 district permits the greatest flexibility to the

reuse

of

the property while complementing the existing commercial uses and protecting

the surrounding residential zoning districts.

n reviewing a rezoning proposal, Section 1139.07 outlines the criteria on which to

base decisions:

A)

Whether the change in classification would be consistent with the intent nd purpose

of

his Zoning Code.

The proposed rezoning is consistent with Zoning Code. As described in the Zoning

Code, the purpose

of

the OC-1 District is to accommodate a mixture

of

office and

commercial uses and is designed and intended to act as a buffet. The OC-1 district is

intended to be mapped between nonresidential and residential uses.

B)

Whether the

proposed

amendment is made necessary because

of

changed or changing

conditions in the area affected, and,

i

o, the nature

o

uch changed or changing

conditions.

The proposed amendment is a result of the razing of the former Hobart Brother s building

which was used to house an industrial use. This provides an opportunity for

redevelopment in the downtown area

to

can promote commercial use but also respect the

surrounding residential neighborhoods.

C) Whether the uses that would be permitted on the property

i

t were reclassified

would

be

compatible with the uses permitted on other property in the immediate vicinity.

Commercial uses would be permitted on this property and is permitted on surrounding

commercial properties already in existence. The intent is to eliminate the intrusive

industrial uses and create a buffer for the adjoining commercial residential zoning

districts.

D) Whether adequate utility, sewer,

nd

water facilities,

nd ll

other needed public

services exist

or

can

be provided

to serve the uses that

would

be permitted on a property

i

t were reclassified.

All utilities are provided.


11/23

E) The amount

of

vacant land that currently has the same zoning classification as is

proposed or the subject property, particularly in the vicinity of he subject property, and

any special circumstances, in any, that make a substantial p rt of uch vacant land

unavailable for development.

In

the vicinity o the subject property, there is no available vacant land with the

OC 1

zoning classification.

F) Whether the proposed amendment would correct an error in the application of his

Zoning Code as applied t

the subject property.

Not applicable in this request.

PUBLIC HEARING

Due to the straight forward nature o the rezoning request and the fact that City Council is

required to hold a public hearing i the request proceeds on, staff does not feel that a

public hearing before the Planning Commission is warranted.

RECOMMENDATION

Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval o the

rezoning from the M-2 Light-Industrial Zoning district to the OC-1 Office-Commercial

district, based on the following:

The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Zoning Code s intent to separate

incompatible land uses; and

o The proposed rezoning will complement the existing commercial zoning districts

and provide flexibility for future development; and

o The OC-1 zoning district will act as a buffer from the surrounding commercial

zoning district to the surrounding residentially zoned neighborhoods.


12/23

Scheduled Planning Commission Meeting

(Held every 2nd and 4th Wednesday

of

the month at

3:30p

.m.)

Office Use Only

Date Filed

Date Requested:

Applicant(s) scheduled on the agenda will be notified

Accepted

by

Filing Fee Pd.

Receipt#

APPLICATION IS DUE TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO MEETING

APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENT

CITY OF TROY PLANNING COMMISSION

(MUST BE

lYPED

OR PRINTED LEGIBLY

IN

BLACK INK)

:

r

(READ SECTION 1139 OF THE ZONING CODE E F O ~ E COMPI,.ETING AP-PliCATION)

.

. .

'

.

.

An application for an amendment to the City of Troy, Ohio

o ~ i r i g

Code

t h ~ f

would .

i a r i ~ e

the. h i ~ g c i a ~ s l f i c a t i o n for

the property located at ~ J j

N.

(l' Bin 1/fetl .} iMVll'f (fk f ct/r .. . i. . . ..

( treet Address)

being lot number(s)

qo ff iiA } ro tt

from

(IJ- 1

to

0,-l

(P'rceldentincat ion Number) ( E x i s t t n g Z o n ~ Classification) ( P r o p o s ~ oning Classification).

OWNER

Name

~ i k i - - - l o l ' b J ~ , ' - 4 1 - - k - - - : f 1 . . : . . . . 1 1 J r a ~ ~ f . . t , ' l l - ; r - - f - J ~ ~ ~ ~ F P i l - ' i ~ ~ . L - r -

Address - w - ~ - \ l - ' ( ) 1 1 _ _ . l r i ~ ' - ~ - - - ' f V l ~ { ) I ( U . , ~ ~'--4;J,_._-.;._

r.IF

City

State = = C ~ l . . : . . . . & < ~ J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~

Zip Code _ Y ~ - ~ - 7 - ' - ' 3 ' 7

PhoneNo.

Fax No.

Email

The applicant is the

/JJJhctiMtl

/lc pnj.

State th:: ' it tkSiof

the applicant)

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLL

OW

ING:

APPLICANT

Name

_ _ _ . . { t ~ ' ~ J y _ . . . . , G ~ 1 f - - - - . L . l o . f t U z , _ _ , _ V

Address _ _ _ _ . _ . } ( 1 ~ ( , _ _ 1

J ~ . _ [ V ) ~ l l . : . . . . . : l o o r ( R " ' - Q . . . ~ - - - ' - J .

C.IL..-h

City

- ~ . . r 4 1 U f r ~ - - - - - - - - -

State

____..a4-'u

Zip Code

- - - L ~ . L . . . : l p ~ 1 ; - 7 i ~ - - - - - -

Phone No. _ _ _ _ . . 3 : : . . . _ z c . . _ ~ 9'--' = - - - 7 ~ ~ 8 : : . _ . . _ 1

Fax No.

_:J.......:....r__ _ , _ ~ f ? . - "q ....f-1------

Email

of

the property, which is subject to this application.

1. The reasons for seeking a change in the zoning classification or zoning text: Attach as EXHIBIT A.

2.

The legal description of land proposed to be reclassified: Attach as EXHIBIT B ..

3. A site plan prepared by a registered engineer, surveyor or architect

in

duplicate drawn to such scale as to clearly

show:

a. The actual dimensions of the subject property according to the recorded plat of such property, lot

numbers, it's present zoning classification, existing and proposed uses: Attach as EXHIBIT

C .

b. The present zoning classification of all surrounding lands located within two hundred and fifty (250) feet

of the land proposed to be reclassified: Attach as EXHIBIT

D

..

c.

A list (see example)

of

the names, addresses, and lot numbers

of

the owners

of

property within a radius

of two hundred and fifty (250) feet from the parcel or parcels of land proposed to be reclassified:

Attach as EXHIBIT E

.

i.

Include one (1) copy

of

County Tax Maps

ii.

Include two (2) sets

of

mailing labels

4. 2 complete sets (Exhibits A-E) reproducible in a format no larger than

11

x17

5. Filing Fee

of

$150.00 made payable to the City of Troy

Page 1 of 2


13/23

I HEREBY

DEPOSE

AND SAY THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND

THE

STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN A

Tf iE EXHIBITS

PREPARED

BY ME AND TRANSMITTED H E R E _ W _ I T H 0 A i ~ r E ~ ~

_ R U . . . . . = ; i 2 1 = . : ~ -

~ ~ - - - - - - - -

L (Applicant Signatu

Subscribed and sworn to before me this j - day ~ C . 8 & , 8 , 20J :f:_

My Commission E x p i r e s ~ - f ~ . , J . . J

S

2 -D Z

,

1

1 , ,

(Month/Date/Year)

Pu

\ j ' ~ @ JAMES A. DANDO Notary Public

d

J

~ ~ ~ ~ \ * ~

lnandfortheStateofOhio

~ - 1 _ , _ _ - = : . .

....

- - . : : . . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - -

EMy

Commission

Expires Apr. 17 2017 (Notary Publ

Recorded in Miami County

{For Office Use

Only

Do Not Write Below This Line)

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS:

EXHIBIT A Reasons

for

Zoning Reclassification

-+-- - -

EXHIBIT B Legal Description

-+-- - -

EXHIBIT C Site Plan: lot dimensions, lot numbers, current zoning, exist ing and proposed uses

-+-- - -

EXHIBIT D Site Map with Zoning & Owners within 250 feet of parcel

EXHIBIT E Property Owners List within 250 feet of parcel

-+-- - -

Labels Two (2) Sets of Mailing Labels of Property Owners

Copies Fifteen (15) Complete Sets in a reproducible format 11 x17

Map(s) One (1) County Tax Map(s)

Filing Fee Check issued to City of Troy for 150.00

- + - - - : - - : - : : : - - . - - ~

Additional

Documentation

{List):

PLANNING COMMISSION DISPOSITION:

1

PUBLIC HEARING DATE

1

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL

CITY COUNCIL DISPOSITION:

1st Reading:

2 d:

3rd:

PUBLIC HEARING DATE

COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

Approved:

Denied: CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Ordinance Number:

Effective

Date:

Revised 10/25/11

Page 2 of 2


14/23

i i t i ~ 6 ~ o

l

f

d Pa trick E. J.

il f

le

il

hglon _

~ r ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

;

j

, D ir

ector of

Public S

ervice

Safety

il

1

00

S.

Mark

et Street, P.

0

Box 3003

~ t U J n .

Troy,

Ohio

45373-7303

:S.:?;::J c.;

::: p h

one:

(937) 335-1725/fax: (937) 339-860 I

t i t t e r i n g t o n t r o y o h i o g o v

November 25,2014

Mr. Rodney L. Jones

Director

of

Real Estate and Controller

lllinois Tool Works, Inc.

3600

West Lake Avenue

Glenview, IL

60026-1215

Dear Mr. Jones:

To follow up with our conversation last week, the City ofTroy is interested in initiating the rezoning of he

parcels that collectively make

up

the site

of

the former Dlinois Tool Works ITW)/Hobart Brothers

manufacturing facility at 600 West Main Street. Those

31

parcels a map

of

which is attached hereto) are

currently zoned

M 2

Light Industrial District, which as you know is not compatible

with

the surrowuiing

properties and uses. The City desires to rezone those parcels to OC-1 Office Commercial District,

which

would allow compatible uses, as evidenced

y

the list ofPrincipal Permitted Uses that is also attached.

I am requesting your signature below to demonstrate that ITW does not object to the City rezoning those

parcels. Please note that the rezoning process will be completed y the City ofTroy at no cost to ITW.

Sincerely,

Patrick E.

J.

Titterington

Director ofPublic Service and Safety

Illinois Tool Works does not object

t

the City of Troy Ohio initiating t its

sole cost the rezoning

of

he properties identified on the attached map.

attachments

cc:

Michael

L.

Beamish, Mayor

Jim Livingston, Law Director

Jim Dando, Development Director

J.C. Wallace, CEO/President, Troy Development Council

ate


15/23


16/23


17/23

Exhibit A


18/23

OC-1 Principal Permitted Uses

Accountant s office.

Adult Family Home.

Apparel stores - retail sales.

Architect s office.

Art galleries and museums.

Artist, sculptor and composer studios.

Attorney s office.

Automobile parking garages.

Automobile parking lots.

Banks and financial institutions.

Barber and beauty shops.

Bed and breakfast.

Business, civic, fraternal association and labor meeting rooms .

Business and technical schools.

Day-care centers.

Drug stores - retail sales.

Engineer s office.

Family Home

Florists.

Food stores - retail sales.

Foster Family Home.

Gift shops.

Government buildings, structures,

or

premises

Health studios and clubs.

Insurance agent s office.

Jewelry- retail sales.

Libraries.

Medical and dental laboratories.

Medical and dental office/clinic.

Mortuaries and funeral parlors.

Newsstand

retail sales.

Nursing homes.

Photo studios.

Private clubs.

Professional Offices not otherwise mentioned.

Public parks, playgrounds and community centers.

Public utility.

Real estate broker s office.

Residential use on second story or above.

Retail and service uses.

Schools

primary, intermediate and

secondary

publ ic or private.

Seamstress and tailor.

Veterinary office -

o

boarding.

M-2

Principal

Permitted Uses

Agricultural implement sales and service.

Agricultural uses.

Auction sales.

Automobile fuel dispensing station.

Automobile parking garages.

Automobile parking lots.

Automobile repair garages - including body work.

Bakeries - wholesale sales.

Beverage distributors and bottling plants.

Printing, publishing, binding and typesetting

plants.

Private clubs.

Public utility.

Railroad stations, depots, train yards,

classification yards and team tracks.

Research and engineering laboratories.

Sales offices and service centers.

Sawing and planning mills.

Sexually oriented business.

Sign painting and manufacture.

Bone, canvas, cellophane, clay, cloth, cork, feathers, felt - Stone products processing and manufacturing.

manufacturing , assembling, compounding,

or

treatment (or any

Building material sales and storage facilities .

Carpentry shops.

Cash advance businesses.

Cement block and formed products manufacturing.

Cold storage plants.

Commercial greenhouses and nurseries.

Contractor sales, storage and equipment yards .

Crematoriums (pet and human).

Dairy and food product processing and packaging .

Driver training schools (trucks).

Dry cleaning - commercial.

Electrical and electronic products, components and equipment -

manufacturing, assemblinp; or repair.

Equipment rental services, including cars, trucks and trailers .

Exterminating services.

Fiber, fur, glass, hair, hom, leather, paper, plastics, rubber, precious or

semi-precious stone or metal, sheet metal, shell, textiles , tobacco, wax,

Food brokers - retail, wholesale and storage without processing.

Frozen food lockers.

Garden stores.

Government buildings, structures, or premises used exclusively be

federal, state, county, township,

or

municipal p;ovemments for public

Government buildings, structures, or premises used exclusively by

federal. state, county. township or municipal governments for public

Heating, A/C, electric and plumbing sales, service and repair.

Liquid fuel, petroleum products, petroleum, and volatile oils - bulk

storage stations in accordance with Section 1143.18(g) hereof.

Machine shops, tool and die shops.

Machinery and heavy equipment rental, sales and storage.

Manufacturing, assembling or repair of medical, dental, optical and

similar precision instruments

or

appliances .

Meat processing and packaging, exclusive of slaughtering.

Medical and dental laboratories.

Metal products, excluding structural steel and foundry products or

product from previously prepared materials manufacturing,

Moving and storage companies.

Musical instruments - manufacturing, assembling or repair.

Novelties, toys and rubber products - manufacturing, assembling or

repair.

Pawn shops.

Pharmaceutical products, including cosmetics, toiletries and perfumes,

but excluding the manufacture of soap from raw materials or products

Pool Halls.

Tattoo parlors.

Truck fuel dispensing stations.

Truck repair facility.

Truck sales and service.

Truck washing facility.

Trucking and motor freight terminals.

Watches and clocks, including clock operated

devices - manufacturing, assembling

or

repair.

Water filtration plants and pumping stations.

Wholesale houses, warehouse and other storage

facilities


19/23

OC1 Office Commercial District us s not permitted in

t he M 2 Zoning District

Accountan

t

s office.

Adult Family

Home

.

Apparel stores - retail sales.

Architect s office.

Art

galleries and museums.

Artist, sculptor and composer studios.

Attorney s office.

Banks and financial institutions.

Barber and beauty shops.

Bed

and breakfast.

Business, civic, fraternal association and labor meeting rooms .

Business and technical schools.

Day-care centers.

Drug stores - retail sales.

Engineer s office.

Family Home

Florists.

Food stores - retail sales.

Foster Family Home

.

Gift shops.

Health studios and clubs.

Insurance agent s office.

Jewelry- retail sales.

Libraries.

Medical and dental office/clinic.

Mortuaries and funeral parlors.

Newsstand-

retail sales.

Nursing homes.

Photo studios.

Professional Offices not otherwise mentioned

Public parks, playgrounds and community centers.

Real estate broker s office.

Res idential use on second story

or

above.

Retail and service uses.

Schools - primary, intermediate and

secondary-

public or private.

Seamstress and tailor.

Veterinary office - no boarding.

M 2 LightIndustrial District us s not permitted in the OC

1 Zoning District

Agricultural implement sales and service.

Agricultural uses.

Auction sales.

Automobile fuel dispensing station.

Automobile repair garages - including body work

Bakeries - wholesale sales.

Beverage distributors and bottling plants .

Pharmaceutical products, including cosmetics, toiletries

and perfumes. but excluding the manufacture of soap from

Pool Halls.

Printing, publishing, binding and typesetting plants.

Railroad stations, depots, train yards, classification yards

and team tracks.

Research and engineering laboratories.

Sales offices and service centers.

Sawing an d planning mills.

Bone

, canvas, ceUophane, clay, cloth, cork, feathers, felt - Sexually oriented business.

manufacturing. assembling. compounding,

or

treatment (or any

Building material sales and storage facilities.

Carpentry shops.

Cash advance businesses.

Cement block and formed products manufacturing.

Cold storage plants.

Commercial greenhouses and nurseries.

Contractor sales, storage and equipment yards.

Crematoriums (pet and human).

Dairy and food product processing and packaging.

Driver training schools (trucks).

Dry cleaning

-commercial

.

Electrical and electronic products, components and equipment -

manufacturing, assembling

or

repair.

Equipment rental services, including cars, trucks and trailers.

Exterminating services.

Fiber, fur, glass, hair, hom, leather, paper, plastics, rubber, precious

or

semi-precious stone

or metal

sheet metal.

she

. textiles. tobacco.

Food brokers - retail, wholesale and storage without processing.

Frozen food lockers.

Garden stores.

Heating,

NC

electric and plumbing sales, service and repair.

Liquid

f u ~

petroleum products, petroleum, and volatile oils - bulk

storage stations in accordance with Section 1143.18(g) hereof.

Machine shops, tool and die shops.

Machinery and heavy equipment rental, sales and storage.

Manufacturing, assembling

or

repair

of

medical,

e n ~

optical and

similar precision instruments

or

appliances.

Meat processing and packaging, exclusive of slaughtering.

Metal products, excluding structural steel and foundry products or

product from previously prepared materials - manufacturing,

Moving and storage companies.

Musical instruments - manufacturing, assembling or repair.

Novelties, toys and rubber products - manufacturing, assembling

or

repair.

Pawn shops.

Sign painting and manufacture.

Stone products processing and manufacturing.

Tattoo parlors.

Truck fuel dispensing stations.

Truck repair facility.

Truck sales and service.

Truck washing facility.

Trucking and motor freight terminals.

Watches and clocks, including clock operated devices -

manufacturing. assembling or repair.

Water

filtration plants and pumping stations.

Wholesale houses, warehouse and other storage facilities


20/23

LIST OF P RCELS SSOCI TED WITH REZONING OF HOBART PROPERTY ON WEST

MAIN STREET

: No.

Parcel

Owner

P r o ~ e r t ~ d d r e s s

.. MaiUngAddress

LandUse

. Acr

1

008 003610

HOB RT BROTHERS

CO

600W MAIN ST 600 W MAIN ST TROY

OH

45373

330 2.9

2

008 003380

HOB RT BROTHERS

CO

ADAMSST

D MS T TROY

OH 45373

330 0.0

3

008 004950

HOB RT

BROTHERS CO ELM

ST ELM STTROY OH 45373

330

0.1

4

008 004960

HOB RT BROTHERS

CO

ELMST

ELM ST

TROY

OH 45373

330

0.3

5

008 004980

HOB RT

BROTHERS CO ELM

ST ElM ST

TROY

OH 45373

330

0.0

6

008 004990

HOB RT BROTHERS

CO

ELM ST ELM STTROY OH 45373

330 0.1

7

008 005010 HOB RT BROTHERS

CO

ELM

ST

ELM

ST TROY OH

45373

330

0.1

8

008 005020

HOB RT

BROTHERS CO ELM

ST

ELM

ST TROY OH

45373

330

0.1

9

008 005030

HOB RT

BROTHERS

CO

ELM

ST ELM ST

TROY

OH 45373

330

0.1

10

008 005040 HOB RT BROTHERS CO

ELM

ST

ELM ST

TROY OH

45373

330

0.1

11

008 005060

HOB RT

BROTHERS CO

ELM ST ELM STTROY OH

45373

330

0.0

12

008 005070

HOB RT BROTHERS

CO ELM ST

ELM ST TROY OH 45373

330

0.1

13

008 005075 HOB RT BROTHERS CO

ELM

ST

ELM ST

TROY OH

45373

330 .

0.2

14 008 005080

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

ElM ST

ElM

STTROYOH 45373

330 0.2

15

008 003370 HOB RT

BROTHERS

CO

J CKSON ST J CKSON ST TROY OH 45373

330 0

16

008 091220

HOB RT BROTHERS CO WMAINST MAIN STTROYOH 45373

330

0.7

17 008 005090

HOB RT

BROTHERS

CO

N ElM ST

N ElM ST TROY OH 45373

330

0.1

18 008 005100

HOB RT

BROTHERS

CO

N

ElM

ST

N ElM STTROY

OH

45373 330 0.1

19


CO N ElM ST N ElM STTROY OH 45373

330 0.1

20


CO N ElM ST N ElM ST TROY

OH

45373

330

0.2

21


CO N ElM

ST

N ElM ST TROY

OH

45373

320

0.2

22

008 008490

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

N ElM ST N ElM ST TROY

OH

45373

330 0.2

23

008 008500

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

N ElM

ST N ElM

ST

TROY

OH

45373

330 0.2

24

008 :004940

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

WMAINST

W MAIN STTROYOH 45373

330

.0.11

25

008 Q04955 HOB RT BROTHERS CO

WMAINST

400 ETR D SQ TROY OH 45373

330 0.48

26 008 003350

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

WATERST

W TER STTROY

OH

45373

330

0

27

008 003390

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

WATERST

W TER ST TROY OH 45373

330 0.08

28

008 003410

HOB RT

BROTHERS CO WATERST

W TER

STTROY OH 45373

330 0

29 008 003600 HOB RT BROTHERS

CO WATERST

W TER STTROY OH

45373

330 0.59

30 008 004995

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

WATERST

400 ETR D SQ TROY OH 45373

330 0.49

31

008 005050

HOB RT BROTHERS CO

WATERST

W TER STTROY OH 45373

330 0.04

TOT

L

CRES 8.65

Note:

List does not include 9 unidentified parcels numbers

located

within the address

of

600

W

Main St.


21/23

December

10

2014

A meeting of the Troy Planning Commission was held Wednesday, December 10 2014, at 3:30p.m. in

second floor conference room, City Hall, Vice-Chairman Thomas Force presiding. Also present were

membe

Mahan, Titterington, Johnson, McGarry, and Beamish; Planning Staff T Davis, S Brandon and D Puckett.

The minutes of the November 12, 2014 meeting were approved.

REZONING REQUEST - 600 WEST MAIN STREET (40 PARCELS TOTAL) FROM TO M-2. LIG

INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. TO OC-1, OFFICE-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; THE AREA PROPOSED TO

REZONED CONSISTS OF TEN PARCELS LOCATED ALONG NORTH ELM STREET (BETWE

WASHINGTON STREET AND WEST WATER STREET). FIVE PARCELS LOCATED ALONG T

INTERSECTION

OF

WEST WATER STREET AND ADAMS STREET, AND 25 PARCELS THAT ENCOMPA

THE 600 WEST MAIN STREET LOCATION; OWNER IS HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY; APPLICANT

CITY OF TROY. Mr. Davis commented that the City of Troy on behalf of Hobart Brothers Company has reques

the rezoning of 40 parcels from the M-2 Light-Industrial District to the OC-1 Office-Commercial District; the repor

staff (attached to original minutes) includes a list of the parcels (nine of which do not have parcels number due

prior replat and being built over), a map highlighting the parcels of the proposed rezoning; and information relate

the allowed uses under both zoning categories. It

is

noted that this includes the location of the recently demolish

Hobart Brothers/ITW factory complex that carried the address of 600 West Main Street. He further reported that

surrounding zoning districts include B-2 General Business District

to

the south, a mixture of B-2 General Busin

District and R-7 Multi-Family to the east, R-6 Two-Family Residential to the west, and M-2 Light-Industrial to

north; the razing of the old Hobart Brothers building has left an opportunity for redevelopment

in

the heart of

community; this area was once dominated by industrial uses but has since grown into a mixture of commercial a

residential uses, the City has reached out to the property owner for a rezoning of the area that will complement

commercial district and respect the nearby residential uses; a rezoning from the M-2 Light-Industrial district

to

OC-1

Office-Commercial district will fit harmoniously into this mixed use area; the Zoning Code describes the OC

Office-Commercial district as designed to accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses consisting

groupings

of

professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic and similar use

this district

is

designed and intended to act as a buffer and is intended to

be

mapped along major thoroughfares

a transitional area between nonresidential and residential uses; the OC-1 district does not permit residen

development in this district; however, it does allow residential uses on the second story or above; the OC-1 dist

limits commercial uses that are envisioned to prevent disruption to the surrounding existing residen

neighborhoods and the rezoning will protect the surrounding residences from the more intensive uses that

currently allowed

in

the M-2 zoning district; the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use (Figure 14-2) shows t

area as

it

currently

is

(industrial) and the surrounding land uses

to

remain the same,

as

a mix of commerc

government, residential and recreational uses; the industrial use does not fit well with the adjoining mix of uses; a

it

is

staff's opinion that adjoining properties will benefit from the positive impact of the proposed rezoning as

proposed OC-1 district permits the greatest flexibility to the reuse of the property while complementing the exist

commercial uses and protecting the surrounding residential zoning districts. Regarding the Section 1139

outlines the criteria on which

to

base decisions, staff reported:


22/23

A)

Whether the change

in

classification would be consistent with

the

intent and purpose of this Zoning Code

The proposed rezoning is consistent with Zoning Code.

As

described in

th

Zoning Code, the purpose of the

OC 1

District

is

to accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses and is designed and intended to a

as a buffet. The OC 1 district is intended to be mapped between nonresidential and residential uses.

B)

Whether the proposed amendment is made necessary because

of

changed or changing conditions in the

area affected, and, if

so

the nature

of

such changed

or

changing conditions.

The proposed amendment

is

a result of the razing of the former Hobart Brother s building which was used

to

house an industrial

use.

This provides

an

opportunity for redevelopment in the downtown area to can promo

commercial use but also respect the surrounding residential neighborhoods.

C) Whether the uses that would be permitted on the property if t were reclassif ied would be compatible with

the uses permitted on other property in the immediate vicinity.

Commercial uses would

be

permitted on this property and is permitted on surrounding commercial properties

already

in

existence. The intent

is

to eliminate the intrusive industrial uses and create a buffer for the adjoini

commercial residential zoning districts.

D) Whether adequate utility, sewer, and water facilities, and all other needed public services exist or can be

provided

to

serve the uses that would be permitted on a property if t were reclassified.

All utilities are provided.

E)

The

amount

of

vacant land that currently has the same zoning classification as is proposed for the subjec

property, particularly in the vicinity of he subject property, and any special circumstances, in any, that make

substantial part ofsuch vacant land unavailable for development.

In

the vicinity of the subject property, there is no available vacant land with the

OC 1

zoning classification.

F) Whether the proposed amendment would correct an error in the application of this Zoning Code s applie

to the subject property.

Not applicable

in

this request.

Staff did not recommend a public hearing be held by the Commission due to the straightforward nature o

the rezoning request and the fact that City Council is required to hold a public hearing if the request proceeds on.

Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning from the M-2 Lig

Industrial Zoning district to the

OC 1

Office-Commercial district, based on the following:

o The proposed rezoning

is

consistent with the Zoning Code s intent to separate incompatible land uses; an

o The proposed rezoning will complement the existing commercial zoning districts and provide flexibility

future development; and

o The OC 1 zoning district will act as a buffer from the surrounding commercial zoning district to

surrounding residentially zoned neighborhoods.

Discussion: Mr. Force asked about the Troy Lumber Property, located adjacent to the site of the propos

rezoning, and was advised that Mr. Goodall, owner of Troy Lumber, now owns that site; that he was contac

about being included

in

the rezoning and advised that while

he

supported the redevelopment of the site, at this ti

he did not want

to

include his property in the area proposed to be rezoned.

In

response to Mayor Beamish, it w

stated that as

OC 1

allows residential units

on

a second floor, this could

be

a benefit for the land

to be

m

marketable and the OR zoning permits uses that may

be

more disruptive to the neighborhood. Mr. McGarry stat

he was pleased to see that the city is taking the initiative on this rezoning proposal.


23/23

PUBLIC HEARING: A motion was made by Mayor Beamish, seconded by Mrs. Mahan, that the Plan

Commission not holds a public hearing, noting that one will

be

held by Council.

MOTION PASSED, UNANIMOUS VOT

REZONING REQUEST: A motion was made by

Mr.

McGarry, seconded by Mrs. Johnson, that

Planning Commission recommends to Troy City Council that the rezoning request identified as 600 West M

Street (40 parcels total) from

to

M-2, Light-Industrial District, to OC-1 Office-Commercial District,

be

appro

based on the findings

o

staff that:

The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Zoning Code s intent

to

separate incompatible land uses; a

The proposed rezoning will complement the existing commercial zoning districts and provide flexibility

future development; and

o The OC-1 zoning district will act as a buffer from the surrounding commercial zoning district to

surrounding residentially zoned neighborhoods.

MOTION PASSED, UNANIMOUS VOT

city council committee meetings (1/27/2015)

Documents