cisoa presentationv as of 03 08 2015 final
TRANSCRIPT
Customer ServiceCommunication, Collaboration, Partner Teach, Train, Educate
Business LeaderTechnical/Analytics/Business
IntelligenceArticulate Business Processes
Translate Innovative Solutions
StrategistLeading Change AgentProject/Program Management
Graduation/Transfer/Certificate = Student Success
WHAT IS… A CIO?1.
Different Skill SetCorporate CIO (increase revenue)
CCC CIO (balance FTES)
Management of Variables
State/Federal Regulations, Governing BoardBargaining Units (faculty, classified, student)Governance (shared, governance board, etc.)
Contrasting Factors Corporate CIO: more budget, less bureaucracy
CCC CISO: more bureaucracy, less budget Decision Point: Economic impact vs. Social Impact
What is Your Point?2.CCC vs. Cooperate
CIO
Cabrillo Community College District
Chabot-Las Positas Community College District
Contra Costa Community College District
Foothill-DeAnza Community College DistrictHartnell Community College District
Marin Community College District
Monterey Peninsula Community College District
Ohlone Community College District
Peralta Community College District
San Francisco Community College District
San Jose-Evergreen Community College District
San Mateo County Community College District
West Valley-Mission Community College District
Bay Area Community College Districts
Educational Services
Human Resources
Finance & Administratio
n
General Services
Information Technology
College Services
College Services
College Services
IT Service Environment
What do you want me to do?3.
Fix it - Fix it NowINSTRUCTIONAL , ADMINISTRATIVE, INFRASTRUCTURE
Blame Service UnitsBacklog of Service Tickets
Project Failure
Implement w/o Knowledge
Baseless Assumptions
Create long-term problems / re-work
InnovateHelp services unit develop business processes
Innovation
Project RiskOverworked Resources (conflict)
Create long-term problem (re-work)
EducateContinuous Improvement
Project ConstraintsTime vs. Budget vs.
Scope/QualityOrganizational Maturity
Budget
Time Quality
AssumptionsEnvironmental Factors
Start FinishProject Timeline
Scope
Help Develop Organizational Maturity
Start Finish
Project #2 Timeline
Start Finish
Project #3 Timeline
Organizational Maturity
Project #1 Timeline
Start Finish
1/3 of Implementation Time
Help Units w/Business Processes
Why is this important?4.Assessment of Blind Spots (IRE)
ResourcesHuman
Financial
ExecutionProject Management
InfrastructureHardware
Software
Identify, Determine, Realize, Devise, Implement
Student ID Conversion Project
C A LV I N M A D L O C K
Example Projects
Achieving Readiness for“Disruptive” Technology Changes
5.
Accreditation Standard III C Project
Project Network Upgrade Project
Student Financial Aid Project
Student ID Conversion Project
Problem:Address California SB 25 - Law on use of SSN
Challenge:• Prohibits publicly posting or
displaying• Prohibits printing on any card required
to access products or services• Prohibits encoding or embedding in
or on a card or document
Resolution:• Implemented in less then 72 hours
(without a glitch)
• Planned for one year
Accreditation Standard III C Project
Problem:Adhere to ACCJC Recommendation #2.dChallenge:• Administrative and Instructional computing should be equally addressed
• Dialogue must produced impartial priorities
• Provide transparency with implementations and budgetary needs for technology
Resolution:Satisfied ACCJC Requirement by the
development and execution of a Campus Computing Lifecycle Methodology (CCLM)
Accreditation Standard III C Project
Constituent GroupsSS, BCSED, LC, HR, A&R, MSE, IRES, ITS, Palmdale City, IMC, TE, Facilities, HS, FA, Bookstore, PE, AS, VAPA, OSD, etc…
step 1Need
Assessment(ITS)
step 2
Consolidate,Estimate, Scope
(ITS)
Prioritization(IT Committee)
step 3
Budget Request
(SPBC)
step 4
Schedule & Implement
(ITS)
step 5
Campus Computing Lifecycle Methodology (CCLM)
Project Network Upgrade Project
Problem:
Existing legacy network reached beyond end of lifeChallenge:Slow network traffic and sluggish file access with expired support contracts resulting in costly repairs and unpredictable uptime
Resolution:
Upgrade completed with less than 15 minute of unscheduled downtime. Utilized internal project management SDLM while partnering with sound trusted network migration vendor
PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
System Development Lifecycle Methodology
Step 1
Project Charter
Initialization & Planning
Business Process Overview
Project Work Plan
•Business Process & Requirements•Fit/Gap Report•Process Mapping
Quality Assurance (QA) Deliverable Report
(sign-off)
Step 2
Develop Preliminary Prototype
Prepare Technical Plan
Apply Functional Specifications
Develop Preliminary Test Plans
Quality Assurance (QA) Deliverable Report (sign-off)
Analysis & Design
Architect System Infrastructure
Technical Design/Plan
• Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)• Data Conversion• Customization/Retrofit/Construction• Detail Configuration & Setup
Expand Prototype
Develop Final Test Plan
• Build Test Scripts• Develop Training Material
Quality Assurance (QA) Deliverable Report (sign-off)
Step 3
Develop/Configure/Execute Test/Train/Monitor
Validate/Update Infrastructure
Conduct Testing Processes
• Unit Testing Process• Integration Testing Process• System Testing Process
Functional Testing Process Performance Testing Process
• User Acceptance Testing Process
Validate/Develop Cutover Plan
Provide End User Training & Documentation
Quality Assurance (QA) Deliverable Report (sign-off)
Step 4
Deploy/Optimize/Closeout
Develop Contingency Plan
Prepare Production Environment
Execute Deployment Plan
Validate Cutover (go/no-go)
Validate Cutover (go/no-go)
Quality Assurance (QA) Deliverable Report (sign-
off)
Deploy/Implement
Training & Knowledge Transfer
Warranty Period
Step 5
Student Financial Aid Project
Problem:Student Financial Aid module running on legacy end of life system
Challenge:Migrate from legacy system to existing ERP system after three failed attempts from previous administrations
Resolution:1st to implement student financial aid for multi-community college district in California utilizing Oracle/PeopleSoft. Nation wide search to partner with trusted vendor with capacity to deploy
Comparative Statistics
Pell Awards Disbursed Per Campus
Pell Awards Disbursed 9/5/2013
Pell Awards Disbursed 9/5/2014
% Change in Disbursement From
Prior Year
Alameda College 459 896 95%
Berkeley City College 560 1047 87%
Laney College 895 1829 104%
Merritt College 294 1032 251%
GRAND TOTAL 2208 4804 118%
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
896
1047
1829
1032
459
560
897
294
2013
2014
Alameda College
Berkeley City College
Laney College
Merritt College